x

Política de cookies

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso.

Más información
Solicitud de permisos - Ayuda - - Regístrese - Teléfono 902 888 740
Buscar en

Indexada en:

PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Biological Abstracts, Artemisa, Biosis, Healthstar, Pascal, Índice de revistas mexicanas de investigación científica y tecnológica, (CONACYT), Cancerlit, Toxfile, Free Medical Journals, Bibliorama, Inside Conferences, Compendex, Geobase, Scopus, ISI-Master Journal List, Latindex, MD Consult Core Service (Elsevier), OCLC (A Worldwide library cooperative), Periódica (Índice de Revistas Latinoamericanas en Ciencias), SIIC (Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica), Ulrich/s International Directory, Biosis Toxicology, Embase Alert.

Métricas

  • CiteScore 2017: 0,34
    Leer más
  • SCImago Journal Rank (SJR):0,193
  • Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP):0,182
Arch Cardiol Mex 2018;88:171-7 - DOI: 10.1016/j.acmx.2017.02.008
Clinic Research
Effectiveness of natriuretic peptide-guided treatment of chronic heart failure. A meta-analysis
Efectividad del tratamiento guiado por el péptido natriurético para la insuficiencia cardiaca crónica. Meta-análisis
Ana-Estela Gamiño-Arroyoa,, , Francisco-Javier Prado-Galbarrob,c,d, Sonia García-Pérezd,e, Carlos Sánchez-Piedrad
a Unidad de Infectología, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Ciudad de México, Mexico
b Centro de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Ciudad de México, Mexico
c Unidad de Salud Reproductiva, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
d Agencia Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
e Unidad de investigación, Red Española de Investigación de Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
Recibido 20 diciembre 2016, Aceptado 27 febrero 2017
Abstract
Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of natriuretic peptide (NP)-guided therapy compared to clinically-guided therapy in reducing mortality and hospital admissions in chronic heart failure (HF) patients.

Methods

Randomised clinical trials (RCT) were selected through a systematic review. Four meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes of overall mortality, HF-related mortality, overall hospital admissions, and HF-related hospital admissions. Heterogeneity between studies and publication bias were also assessed.

Results

Nine RCTs were found with a total of 1914 patients. NP-guided therapy significantly reduced overall mortality and HF-related hospital admissions. No significant results were found for HF-related mortality and overall hospital admissions. Some clinical heterogeneity regarding interventions performed was found between studies. Publication bias was found for HF-related and overall hospital admissions.

Conclusions

NP-guided therapy seems to improve outcomes compared to clinically-guided therapy. However, heterogeneity found between interventions might reduce the generalisation of these results. Specific interventions of the clinical trials should be examined when making recommendations regarding NP-guided therapy.

Resumen
Objetivo

Evaluar la eficacia de la terapia guiada por el péptido natriurético (PN) en comparación con la terapia guiada clínicamente para reducir la mortalidad y la hospitalización de la insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) crónica.

Métodos

Los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados fueron seleccionados a través de una revisión sistemática. Cuatro metaanálisis se realizaron para los resultados de mortalidad general, mortalidad por IC, hospitalización general y la hospitalización por IC. Se evaluó la heterogeneidad entre los estudios y el sesgo de publicación.

Resultados

Nueve ensayos clínicos aleatorizados se encontraron con un total de 1,914 pacientes. La terapia guiada con el PN reduce significativamente la mortalidad general y la hospitalización por IC. No se encontraron resultados significativos para la mortalidad por IC y la hospitalización general. El sesgo de publicación se encontró para las hospitalizaciones por IC y globales.

Conclusiones

La terapia guiada por PN parece mejorar los resultados en comparación con la terapia guiada clínicamente. Sin embargo, la heterogeneidad encontrada entre las intervenciones podría reducir la generalización de estos resultados. Las intervenciones específicas de los ensayos clínicos deben ser analizadas al hacer recomendaciones con respecto a la terapia de guiada por PN.

Keywords
Heart failure, Natriuretic peptide, Meta-analysis, Therapy, NT-proBNP, Mexico
Palabras clave
Insuficiencia cardiaca, Péptido natriurético, Metaanálisis, Terapia, NT-proBNP, México
Introduction

Chronic heart failure (HF) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates.1 The availability of a wide range of treatments (including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, and spironolactone), is not still enough to improve outcomes.2 An incorrect dose titration can lead to a poor response to HF treatment.

Natriuretic peptides (NP) are biomarkers of endoventricular myocardial strain associated with the progression of HF.3–5 In the last decade, some studies have tried to show the potential of both B-type Natriuretic Peptides (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-pro BNP) plasma concentration as valid indicators to drive HF treatment.6,7 These biomarkers are proposed as parameters able to lead dose titration in HF patients. Multiple studies have compared whether NP-guided management could improve results compared with usual strategy based on assessment of clinical status.

NP biomarkers have well recognized applicability in diagnosis and prognosis of HF.2,7,8 However, their use to guide therapy titration is not as accepted. The ACCF/AHA guideline reports that the reduction of mortality and hospitalization of HF patients through NP monitoring is not well established. It considers reasonable to monitor NP in order to achieve optimal therapeutic doses only in select clinically euvolemic patients followed in well-structured management programs.8 NICE recommends that NP monitoring is considered in some patients; for example, those with problematic dose titration and patients admitted to hospital.7

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether NP-guided therapy, compared to clinically guided therapy, improves clinical results in HF patients. Meta-analyses of the available evidence were performed for four outcomes: overall mortality, HF-related mortality, overall hospitalization, and HF-related hospitalization; including the most recent clinical trials.

Materials and methodsData search

A computerized search was performed between 2000 and 2014 using biomedical databases Cochrane, Medline, EMBASE, with the keywords “Natriuretic Peptide, Brain” AND “Heart Failure”. Searches were performed using Mesh terms and free text in order to find the, non-indexed, most recent publications. Gray literature was searched on the database clinicaltrials.gov. A manual search was performed from the references of selected studies. Whenever possible, limits were used for language: Spanish and English; and type of study: randomized clinical trials (RCT).

Study selection

Study selection was done by pairs, resolving disagreements by consensus. Included studies were those answering the question: “The modification of drug therapy in HF patients based on the NP monitoring, compared to clinically-guided therapy, is effective in reducing the frequency of mortality and hospitalization events?”.

The exclusion criteria for selecting articles were: language (other than English or Spanish); publication type (other than RCT); not answering the outlined question; and those studies which did not report any of the outcomes defined or which did not report the outcomes as absolute number of patients.

Data extraction

Data extraction was done by pairs, resolving disagreements by consensus. The outcomes extracted were overall mortality, HF-related mortality, overall hospitalization, and HF-related hospitalization provided as absolute numbers of patients.

Statistical analysis

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated for each individual trial from the absolute numbers reported for the outcomes under evaluation: overall mortality, HF-related mortality, overall hospitalization, HF-related hospitalization.

Pooled OR and 95% CI were calculated for each of the four outcomes. The limit for statistical significance was set at p0.05. Heterogeneity was studied through the Cochran Q test and I2 statistic. For the Q test p-value of 0.10 was taken as the limit of significance.9I2 was classified into low (25–50%), medium (51–75%) and high (<75%) heterogeneity. When significant heterogeneity was not found, the studies were combined using fixed models using the Mantel-Haenszel. When heterogeneity was detected, random effects models (DerSimonian-Laird method) were used. Forest Plot graphs were used to represent the effectiveness of the intervention compared to the control group, in terms of OR.

Publication bias was assessed by Funnel plots and Begg and Egger methods.

Data were analyzed using STATA (version 11.0, Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

ResultsStudy selection and characteristics of included trials

Initially, 1213 articles were identified of possible relevance to the study, of which 27 were analyzed in full text to decide their eligibility. Finally, 9 articles were included in the systematic review and meta-analyses10–18 (Fig. 1). The mean follow up was 11.9±6.1. The total number of patients was 1914 with mean age of 70.0±4.8, being men 55.9% (Table 1).

Figure 1.
(0.23MB).

Flow-chart. Literature search and selection of articles.

Table 1.

Characteristics of clinical trials and patients included.

  Groupa  Troughton16  Anguita17  Da Silva10  STARS BNP15  TIME-CHF11  PRIMA14  SIGNAL-HF13  UPSTEP12  PROTECT18 
Year    2000  2000  2005  2007  2009  2010  2010  2011  2011 
Follow-up time mean (months)    9.5  16  15  18  24  12  10 
N33  30  21  110  251  174  126  147  75 
36  30  20  110  248  171  124  132  76 
Age mean (SD)68  70 (8)  64.5  66 (6)  76 (7)  71.6 (12)  77 (8)  71.6 (9.7)  63 (14.5) 
72  69 (12)  65.6  65 (5)  77 (8)  72.8 (12)  77 (8)  70.1 (10)  63.5 (13.5) 
Men, n (%)26 (78)  20 (67)  7 (33.3)  62 (56.4)  171 (68.1)  79 (45.4)  42 (34)  107 (40)  66 (88.2) 
27 (75)  21 (70)  7 (35)  65 (59.1)  156 (62.9)  69 (40.4)  42 (34)  96 (36)  64 (84.2) 
LVEF %, average (SD)28%  44 (18)  23.8 (8.8)  31.8% (8.4)  29.8 (7.7)  34.9% (13.7)  33% (7)  84% (<30)  28% (8.7) 
26%  46 (18)  20.9 (9.2)  29.9% (7.7)  29.7 (7.9)  36.7% (14.8)  33% (7)  76% (<30)  25.9% (8.3) 
BNP, pg/mL average (SD)  57 (77)  502 (411)  –        808.2 (676.1)   
  65 (97)  702 (410)  –        898.9 (915.3)   
NT-pro BNP, pg/mL, median (IQR)217        3998 (2075–7220)  2936  2661    2344 
251        4657 (2455–7520)  2961  2429    1946 
a

I, intervention group; C, control group.

Heterogeneity

The Cochran Q test and I2 statistic detected significant heterogeneity or the outcomes of HF-related mortality and HF-related hospitalization; therefore, random effects models were used. Meta-analyses for overall mortality and overall hospitalization were performed using fixed effects models.

Outcomes analysesOverall mortality

Seven studies provided data on overall mortality.11–17 The mortality risk decreased significantly in patients under NP-guided therapy (OR, 0.733, 95% CI, 0.568 to 0.946, p=0.017, I2=0%). Only one study reported an OR above 1; however this effect was not statistically significant and the study represented a very small weight (1.88%)17 (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.
(0.16MB).

Individual OR and meta-analysis/Funnel plot of publication bias for overall mortality.

Begg's (p-value=0.881) and Egger's (p-value=0.718) tests and funnel plot (Fig. 2) showed a low publication bias for this outcome.

HF-related mortality

Three studies provided data on mortality associated with HF.10,12,15 The difference in mortality risk between groups was not statistically significant; neither globally (OR, 0.699, 95% CI, 0.26–1.89, p=0.479, I2=42.5%), nor for any of the studies individually (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.
(0.18MB).

Individual OR and meta-analysis/Funnel plot of publication bias for HF-related mortality.

Begg's (p-value=0.602) and Egger's (p-value=0.441) tests and funnel plot (Fig. 3) showed a low publication bias for this outcome.

Overall hospitalizations

Five studies reported information on this outcome.6,10–12,15 The risk of hospitalization did not decreased significantly in the group with NP-guided therapy (OR, 0.801, 95% CI, 0.622–1.033, p=0.087, I2=0%). None of the studies reported statistically significant results either (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.
(0.16MB).

Individual OR and meta-analysis/Funnel plot of publication bias for overall hospitalization.

Begg's (p-value=0.014) and Egger's (p-value=0.025) tests and funnel plot (Fig. 4) showed a significant publication bias for this outcome.

HF-related hospitalization

Four studies were included for this outcome.12,15,17,18 The risk of hospitalization associated with HF decreased significantly in the group with NP-guided therapy (OR, 0.530, 95% CI, 0.287–0.979, p=0.043; I2=67.1%). Two of the studies evaluated found statistically significant results for this outcome.15,18 Only one clinical trial reported an OR above 1; however this effect was not statistically significant and the study represented a very low (16.86%) weight17 (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.
(0.17MB).

Individual OR and meta-analysis/Funnel plot of publication bias for HF-related hospitalization.

Begg's (p-value=1) and Egger's (p-value=0.957) tests and funnel plot (Fig. 5) showed a significant publication bias for this outcome.

Discussion

The present study found that NP-guided therapy for HF management decreases overall mortality and HF-related hospitalization. These findings met results from previous meta-analyses.19–21 Only for overall mortality, one of the previous studies did not report differences between NP monitoring and conventional clinically guided management, although results were close to significance.21

This study did not show a significant effect of NP-guided management on HF-related mortality and all-cause hospitalization. Again, the same result was obtained by another meta-analysis evaluating all-cause hospitalization.19 None of the previous meta-analysis evaluated the outcome HF-related mortality.

Considering the primary evidence, only two of the clinical trials included in the meta-analyses showed a significant positive effect for NP-guided management, decreasing HF-related hospitalization.15,18 The rest of the studies did not have statistically significant results for any of the outcomes evaluated; although, there was a general trend favoring NP-guided management.

The main limitation of the present study comes from the clinical heterogeneity found in the primary evidence. Even when controlling for statistical heterogeneity, it might happen that similar results come from clinically different interventions. For example, some of the studies evaluated specifically NT-pro BNP biomarkers11,13,14,16,18; whilst, others looked at BNP-guided therapy.10,12,15,17 NT-pro BNP has been reported to be more effective than BNP-guided therapy.19 Another difference across interventions was that some study protocols established to intensify drug therapy to reach NP concentrations below a certain level (different for each study)11,12,15–17; whilst, others changed therapy according to clinical factors, NP levels, and physicians criteria; but, without establishing a threshold of this type.10,13,14

Another limitation arises from the difficulty of blinding physicians and patients for these interventions. This lack of blinding in most of the studies might overestimate the positive results found for NP-guided management. Also, taking into account that patients in the intervention group have more frequent visits to health care professionals, it is not straightforward to attribute the intervention effect to the NP monitoring rather than to a more stretch control of the patients.

This study did not include three of the clinical trials considered in previous meta-analyses because they not reported results as absolute number of patients for the outcomes under this assessment.22–24

Guided management of HF patients through NP monitoring seems to have a clinical benefit represented as mortality and hospitalization reductions. However, given the clinical heterogeneity found between the studies, these results should be examined cautiously and take into account the specific interventions perform for each study.

Ethical disclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Funding

None declared.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1
K.K. Ho,J.L. Pinsky,W.B. Kannel
The epidemiology of heart failure: the Framingham Study
J Am Coll Cardiol, 22 (1993), pp. 6A-13A
2
J.J.V. McMurray,S. Adamopoulos,S.D. Anker
ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC
Eur J Heart Fail, 14 (2012), pp. 803-869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfs105
3
A.J. De Bold,K.K. Ma,Y. Zhang
The physiological and pathophysiological modulation of the endocrine function of the heart
Can J Physiol Pharmacol, 79 (2001), pp. 705-714
4
B.A. Groenning,I. Raymond,P.R. Hildebrandt
Diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of left ventricular systolic heart failure by plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentrations in a large sample of the general population
Heart Br Card Soc, 90 (2004), pp. 297-303
5
M.F. McGrath,M.L.K. de Bold,A.J. de Bold
The endocrine function of the heart
Trends Endocrinol Metab TEM, 16 (2005), pp. 469-477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2005.10.007
6
M. Packer
Should B-type natriuretic peptide be measured routinely to guide the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure?
7
National Clinical Guideline Centre
Chronic heart failure: the management of chronic heart failure in adults in primary and secondary care
National Clinical Guideline Centre, (2010)
8
C.W. Yancy,M. Jessup,B. Bozkurt
ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure
J Am Coll Cardiol, 62 (2013), pp. e147-e239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019
9
J.P.T. Higgins,S.G. Thompson,J.J. Deeks
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
10
L. Beck-da-Silva,A. de Bold,M. Fraser
BNP-guided therapy not better than expert's clinical assessment for beta-blocker titration in patients with heart failure
Congest Heart Fail Greenwich Conn, 11 (2005), pp. 248-253
quiz 254–255
11
M. Pfisterer,P. Buser,H. Rickli
BNP-guided vs symptom-guided heart failure therapy: the Trial of Intensified vs Standard Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF) randomized trial
JAMA, 301 (2009), pp. 383-392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.2
12
P. Karlström,U. Alehagen,K. Boman
Brain natriuretic peptide-guided treatment does not improve morbidity and mortality in extensively treated patients with chronic heart failure: responders to treatment have a significantly better outcome
Eur J Heart Fail, 13 (2011), pp. 1096-1103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfr078
13
H. Persson,H. Erntell,B. Eriksson
Improved pharmacological therapy of chronic heart failure in primary care: a randomized Study of NT-proBNP Guided Management of Heart Failure–SIGNAL-HF (Swedish Intervention study–Guidelines and NT-proBNP AnaLysis in Heart Failure)
Eur J Heart Fail, 12 (2010), pp. 1300-1308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfq169
14
L.W.M. Eurlings,P.E.J. van Pol,W.E. Kok
Management of chronic heart failure guided by individual N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide targets: results of the PRIMA (Can PRo-brain-natriuretic peptide guided therapy of chronic heart failure IMprove heart fAilure morbidity and mortality?) study
J Am Coll Cardiol, 56 (2010), pp. 2090-2100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.030
15
P. Jourdain,G. Jondeau,F. Funck
Plasma brain natriuretic peptide-guided therapy to improve outcome in heart failure: the STARS-BNP Multicenter Study
J Am Coll Cardiol, 49 (2007), pp. 1733-1739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.081
16
R.W. Troughton,C.M. Frampton,T.G. Yandle
Treatment of heart failure guided by plasma aminoterminal brain natriuretic peptide (N-BNP) concentrations
Lancet, 355 (2000), pp. 1126-1130
17
M. Anguita,F. Esteban,J.C. Castillo
Usefulness of brain natriuretic peptide levels, as compared with usual clinical control, for the treatment monitoring of patients with heart failure
Med Clin (Barc), 135 (2010), pp. 435-440
18
J.L. Januzzi Jr.,S.U. Rehman,A.A. Mohammed
Use of amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide to guide outpatient therapy of patients with chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction
J Am Coll Cardiol, 58 (2011), pp. 1881-1889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.072
19
G. Savarese,B. Trimarco,S. Dellegrottaglie
Natriuretic peptide-guided therapy in chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of 2,686 patients in 12 randomized trials
20
P. Li,Y. Luo,Y.-M. Chen
B-type natriuretic peptide-guided chronic heart failure therapy: a meta-analysis of 11 randomised controlled trials
Heart Lung Circ, 22 (2013), pp. 852-860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2013.03.077
21
R.W. Troughton,C.M. Frampton,H.-P. Brunner-La Rocca
Effect of B-type natriuretic peptide-guided treatment of chronic heart failure on total mortality and hospitalization: an individual patient meta-analysis
Eur Heart J, 35 (2014), pp. 1559-1567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu090
22
M.R. Shah,R.M. Califf,A. Nohria
The STARBRITE trial: a randomized, pilot study of B-type natriuretic peptide-guided therapy in patients with advanced heart failure
23
J.G. Lainchbury,R.W. Troughton,K.M. Strangman
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide-guided treatment for chronic heart failure: results from the BATTLESCARRED (NT-proBNP-Assisted Treatment To Lessen Serial Cardiac Readmissions and Death) trial
J Am Coll Cardiol, 55 (2009), pp. 53-60 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.095
24
R. Berger,D. Moertl,S. Peter
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide-guided, intensive patient management in addition to multidisciplinary care in chronic heart failure a 3-arm, prospective, randomized pilot study
J Am Coll Cardiol, 55 (2010), pp. 645-653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.078
Corresponding author at: Calle Dr. Márquez 162, Colonia Doctores, Delegación Cuauhtémoc, 06720 Ciudad de México, CDMX, México. (Ana-Estela Gamiño-Arroyo analetse@gmail.com)
Copyright © 2017. Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez