metricas

Radiología

Sugerencias
Radiología Embolización de arterias prostáticas en la hiperplasia benigna de la próstata...
Información de la revista
Vol. 62. Núm. 3.
Páginas 165-248 (Mayo - Junio 2020)
Cita
Cita
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
4086
Vol. 62. Núm. 3.
Páginas 165-248 (Mayo - Junio 2020)
Original

Embolización de arterias prostáticas en la hiperplasia benigna de la próstata en pacientes no quirúrgicos

Embolisation of prostate arteries in benign prostatic hyperplasia in non-surgical patients
Visitas
4086
R. Monreala, C. Roblesb, M. Sánchez-Casadoc, J.J. Ciampia, M. López-Guerrerod, R.J. Ruíz-Salmerónb, C. Lanciegoa,
Autor para correspondencia
clanciego@gmail.com

Autor para correspondencia.
a Unidad de Radiología Intervencionista, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, España
b Servicio Endovascular, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, España
c UCI-Bioestadística, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, España
d Servicio de Urología, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Resumen
Objetivo

Presentar los resultados de un estudio multidisciplinar de dos hospitales terciarios, junto a los servicios de urología, sobre 102 pacientes consecutivos no candidatos a cirugía tratados durante más de 6 años, en los que se realizó embolización de arterias prostáticas para el tratamiento de la hiperplasia benigna.

Material y métodos

Desde diciembre de 2012 a febrero de 2019, 102 pacientes con síntomas de hiperplasia benigna de la próstata (HBP) no candidatos a cirugía o que la rechazaron explícitamente, con una edad media de 73,9 años (rango 47,5-94,5), fueron sometidos a embolización prostática. Se llevó a cabo un seguimiento de estos a través de cuestionarios sobre la sintomatología urinaria, función sexual e impacto en la calidad de vida, así como la medición del volumen prostático, uroflujometría y antígeno prostático específico (PSA) al mes, 3 y 6 meses y al año del procedimiento.

Resultados

La técnica fue exitosa en un 96% de los pacientes (76,2% bilateral y 19,8% unilateral). El tiempo de duración media del procedimiento fue de 92 minutos y el de radioscopia, de 35,2 minutos. Se demostraron cambios estadísticamente significativos (p<0,05) en el PSA, el flujo urinario pico (Qmáx), el cuestionario QoL (Quality of life) y el International Index of Erectile Function (IPSS). El PSA disminuyó un 58% a los 3 meses respecto al valor inicial. Asimismo, el Qmáx aumentó de manera significativa en un 63% al tercer mes tras la embolización. Se obtuvo una mejoría significativa en los test QoL e IPSS, con una disminución de 3,7 puntos y 13,5 puntos de media, respectivamente, al año de seguimiento. El volumen prostático mostró una disminución no estadísticamente significativa al año, tras el tratamiento. Se han recogido una serie de complicaciones menores, que en ningún caso requirieron ingreso hospitalario.

Conclusiones

La embolización prostática para el tratamiento de la HPB demostró ser una técnica eficaz y segura en pacientes no candidatos a cirugía.

Palabras clave:
Próstata
Hiperplasia benigna de la próstata
Embolización
Radiología intervencionista
Abstract
Objective

To present the results of a multidisciplinary study of two tertiary hospitals, together with urology services, on 102 consecutive patients not candidates for surgery treated for more than 6 years, in whom prostatic arteries were embolised for the treatment of benign hyperplasia.

Material and methods

From December 2012 to February 2019, 102 patients with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) not candidates for surgery or who explicitly rejected surgery, with an average age of 73.9 years (range 47.5-94.5), underwent prostatic artery embolisation. The patients were followed up by questionnaires on urinary symptoms, sexual function and impact on quality of life, as well as measurement of prostate volume, uroflowmetry and prostate specific antigen (PSA) at one, 3 and 6 months and one year following the procedure.

Results

The technique was successful in 96% of patients (76.2% bilateral and 19.8% unilateral). The mean duration of the procedure was 92minutes and of the radioscopy 35.2minutes. Statistically significant changes were demonstrated (p <.05) in PSA, peak urinary flow, QoL (quality of life) questionnaire and the International Index of Erectile Function (IPSS). PSA had reduced by 58% from baseline at 3 months. Similarly, the Qmax had increased significantly by 63% in the third month following embolisation. A significant improvement in the QoL and IPSS tests was achieved, with a reduction of 3.7 points and a mean 13.5 points, respectively, at one year's follow-up. Prostate volume showed a non-statistically significant decrease at follow-up of one year following treatment. A series of minor complications was collected, no case of which required hospital admission.

Conclusions

Prostatic embolisation for the treatment of BPH proved an effective and safe technique in patients who were not candidates for surgery.

Keywords:
Prostate
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
Embolisation
Interventional radiology

Artículo

Opciones para acceder a los textos completos de la publicación Radiología
Suscriptor
Suscriptor de la revista

Si ya tiene sus datos de acceso, clique aquí.

Si olvidó su clave de acceso puede recuperarla clicando aquí y seleccionando la opción "He olvidado mi contraseña".
Comprar
Comprar acceso al artículo

Comprando el artículo el PDF del mismo podrá ser descargado

Comprar ahora
Contactar
Teléfono para suscripciones e incidencias
De lunes a viernes de 9h a 18h (GMT+1) excepto los meses de julio y agosto que será de 9 a 15h
Llamadas desde España
932 415 960
Llamadas desde fuera de España
+34 932 415 960
E-mail
Bibliografía
[1]
K.T. McVary, C.G. Roehrborn, A.L. Avins, M.J. Barry, R.C. Bruskewitz, R.F. Donnell, et al.
Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
J Urol., 18 (2011), pp. 1793-1803
[2]
J.S. DeMeritt, F.F. Elmasri, M.P. Esposito, G.S. Rosenberg.
Relief of benign prostatic hyperplasia-related bladder outlet obstruction after transarterial polyvinyl alcohol prostate embolization.
J Vasc Interv Radiol., 11 (2000), pp. 767-770
[3]
F. Sun, F.M. Sánchez, V. Crisóstomo, J.R. Lima, L. Luis, V. García-Martínez, et al.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia: transcatheter arterial embolization as potential treatment--preliminary study in pigs.
Radiology., 246 (2008), pp. 783-789
[4]
G.S. Jeon, J.H. Won, B.M. Lee, J.H. Kim, H.S. Ahn, E.J. Lee, et al.
The effect of transarterial prostate embolization in hormone-induced benign prostatic hyperplasia in dogs: a pilot study.
J Vasc Interv Radiol., 20 (2009), pp. 384-390
[5]
Y.A. Gao, Y. Huang, R. Zhang, Y.D. Yang, Q. Zhang, M. Hou, et al.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia: prostatic arterial embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate--a prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial.
Radiology., 270 (2014), pp. 920-928
[6]
F.C. Carnevale, A. Iscaife, E.M. Yoshinaga, A.M. Moreira, A.A. Antunes, M. Srougi.
Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) Versus Original and PErFecTED Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): Preliminary Results of a Single Center, Prospective Urodynamic-Controlled Analysis.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 39 (2016), pp. 44-52
[7]
A. Uflacker, Z.J. Haskal, T. Bilhim, J. Patrie, T. Huber, J.M. Pisco.
Meta-Analysis of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
J Vasc Interv Radiol., 27 (2016), pp. 1686-1697
[8]
S. Feng, Y. Tian, W. Liu, Z. Li, T. Deng, H. Li, et al.
Prostatic Arterial Embolization Treating Moderate-to-Severe Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Related to Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 40 (2017), pp. 22-32
[9]
M. Kuang, A. Vu, S. Athreya.
A Systematic Review of Prostatic Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 40 (2017), pp. 655-663
[10]
F.C. Carnevale, A.A. Antunes, J.M. da Motta Leal Filho, L.M. de Oliveira Cerri, R.H. Baroni, A.S. Marcelino, et al.
Prostatic artery embolization as a primary treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia: preliminary results in two patients.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 33 (2010), pp. 355-361
[11]
J. Pisco, L. Campos Pinheiro, T. Bilhim, M. Duarte, H. Rio Tinto, L. Fernandes, et al.
Prostatic arterial embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: short- and intermediate-term results.
Radiology., 266 (2013), pp. 668-677
[12]
F.C. Carnevale, A.A. Antunes.
Prostatic artery embolization for enlarged prostates due to benign prostatic hyperplasia How I do it.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 36 (2013), pp. 1452-1463
[13]
S. Bagla, C.P. Martin, A. Van Breda, M.J. Sheridan, K.M. Streling, D. Papdouris, et al.
Early Results from a United States Trial of Prostate Artery Embolization in the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: J Vasc Interv Radiol., 25 (2014), pp. 47-52
[14]
A.M. de Assis, A.M. Moreira, V.C. de Paula Rodrigues, S.H. Harward, A.A. Antunes, M. Srougi, et al.
Pelvic Arterial Anatomy Relevant to Prostatic Artery Embolisation and Proposal for Angiographic Classification.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 38 (2015), pp. 855-861
[15]
N. Kisilevzky, R. García-Mónaco, O. Paralta.
Embolización prostática: un nuevo campo de actuación de la radiología intervencionista.
Rev Argent Radiol., 78 (2014), pp. 99-110
[16]
D. Dindo, N. Demartines, P.A. Clavien.
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.
[17]
B.K. Somani, N. Hacking, T. Bryant, J. Coyne, D. Flowers, M. Harris, et al.
Prostate artery Embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).
BJUI., 114 (2014), pp. 639-640
[18]
S. Feng, Y. Tian, W. Liu, Z. Li, T. Deng, H. Li, et al.
Prostatic arterial embolization treating moderate-to-severe LUTS related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 40 (2016), pp. 22-32
[19]
J.S. Pyo, W.J. Cho.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of prostatic artery embolization for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Clin Radiol., 72 (2017), pp. 16-22
[20]
J.M. Pisco, H. Rio Tinto, L. Campos Pinheiro, T. Bilhim, M. Duarte, L. Fernandes, et al.
Embolisation of prostatic arteries as treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign hyperplasia: results of short- and mid-term follow-up.
Eur Radiol., 23 (2013), pp. 2561-2572
[21]
Q. Li, F. Duan, M.Q. Wang, G.D. Zhang, K. Yuan.
Prostatic arterial embolization with small sized particles for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to large benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Preliminary results.
Chin Med J., 128 (2015), pp. 2072-2077
[22]
R. Garcia-Monaco, L. Garategui, N. Kizilevsky, O. Peralta, P. Rodriguez, J. Palacios-Jaraquemada.
Human cadaveric specimen study of the prostatic arterial anatomy: implications for arterial embolization.
J Vasc Interv Radiol., 25 (2014), pp. 315-322
[23]
T. Bilhim, J.M. Pisco, H. Rio Tinto, L. Fernandes, L.C. Pinheiro, A. Furtado, et al.
Prostatic arterial supply: anatomic and imaging findings relevant for selective arterial embolization.
J Vasc Interv Radiol., 23 (2012), pp. 1403-1415
[24]
T. Bilhim, J. Pisco, H. Rio Tinto, L. Fernandes, L. Campos Pinheiro, M. Duarte, et al.
Unilateral versus bilateral prostatic arterial embolization for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with prostate enlargement.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 36 (2013), pp. 403-411
[25]
S. Bagla, K.S. Rholl, K.M. Sterling, A. van Breda, D. Papadouris, J.M. Cooper, et al.
Utility of cone-beam CT imaging in prostatic artery embolization.
J Vasc Interv Radiol., 24 (2013), pp. 1603-1607
[26]
H. Rio Tinto, J. Martins Pisco, T. Bilhim, M. Duarte, L. Fernandes, J. Pereira, et al.
Prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: short and medium follow-up.
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol., 15 (2012), pp. 290-293
[27]
J.M. Pisco, L.C. Pinheiro, T. Bilhim, M. Duarte, J.R. Mendes, A.G. Oliveira.
Prostatic arterial embolization to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia.
J Vasc Interv Radiol., 22 (2011), pp. 11-19
[28]
M.Q. Wang, L.P. Guo, G.D. Zhang, K. Yuan, K. Li, F. Duan, et al.
Prostatic arterial embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to large (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of midterm follow-up from Chinese population.
[29]
F.C. Carnevale, J.M. da Motta-Leal-Filho, A.A. Antunes, R.H. Baroni, A.S. Marcelino, et al.
Quality of life and clinical symptom improvement support prostatic artery embolization for patients with acute urinary retention caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia.
J Vasc Interv Radiol., 24 (2013), pp. 535-542
[30]
D. Kurbatov, G.I. Russo, A. Lepetukhin, S. Dubsky, I. Sitkin, G. Morgia, et al.
Prostatic artery embolization for prostate volumen greater than 80cm3: results from a sngle.center prospecty study.
[31]
A. Rampoldi, F. Barbosa, S. Secco, C. Migliorisi, A. Galfano, G. Prestini, et al.
Prostatic Artery Embolization as an Alternative to Indwelling Bladder Catheterization to Manage Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Poor Surgical Candidates.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 40 (2017), pp. 530-536
[32]
A.M. Assis, A.M. Moreira, V.C. de Paula Rodrigues, E.M. Yoshinaga, A.A. Antunes, S.H. Harward, et al.
Prostatic artery embolization for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with prostates> 90g: a prospective single-center study.
J Vasc Interv Radiol., 26 (2015), pp. 87-93
[33]
A.A. Antunes, F.C. Carnevale, J.M. da Motta Leal Filho, E.M. Yoshinaga, L.M. Cerri, R.H. Baroni, et al.
Clinical, laboratorial, and urodynamic findings of prostatic artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. A prospective single-center pilot study.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 36 (2013), pp. 978-986
[34]
A. Gregorio, L.A. Andreo, R. Ferrero.
Embolización de arterias prostáticas en pacientes con sonda vesical permanente: experiencia inicial en diceciocho casos.
Intervencionismo., 17 (2017), pp. 53-59
[35]
S. Bathia, V.K. Sinha, B.R. Kava, C. Gómez, M.P.H. Harward, S. Punnen, et al.
Efficacy of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Catheter-dependent patients with large prostate sizes and High Comorbidity Scores.
J Vasc Interv Radiol., 29 (2018), pp. 78-84
[36]
S.C. Yu, C.C. Cho, E. Hung, P.K. Fung-Chiu, C.H. Yee, C.F. Ng.
Prostatic Artery Embolization for Complete Urinary Outflow Obstruction due to Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 40 (2017), pp. 33-40
[37]
J.M. Pisco, T. Bilhim, L.C. Pinheiro, L. Fernandes, J. Pereira, N.V. Costa, et al.
Medium- and Long-Term Outcome of Prostate Artery Embolization for Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results in 630 Patients.
J Vasc Interv Radiol., 27 (2016), pp. 1115-1122
[38]
D. Abt, L. Hechelhammer, G. Mülhaupt, S. Markart, S. Güsewell, T.M. Kessler, et al.
Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus tranurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial.
[39]
A. Ray, J. Powell, M. Speakman, N.T. Longfotd, R. DasGupta, T. Bryant, et al.
Efficacy and safety of Prostate Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: an observational study and propensity-matched comparison with tranurethral resection of the prostate (the UK-ROPE study).
BJU Int., 122 (2018), pp. 270-282
asdasdasd
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas