The aim of this study is to identify processes, examine insights, and develop a theory on the concept of mentorship among deans of Nursing colleges in Region IV-A. Data collection was through semi-structured interviews using aide-memoire. Audio recording and note-taking were done for the data accuracy. Validation was utilized by performing re-interview and through observation to the same KI. Data analysis done was cool and warm, along with the execution of expert analysis, guided by the procedures and phases of Strauss and Corbin.1 The mentor–mentee relationship resulted in 4 phases: Searching, Engaging, Trialing, and Shaping (S.E.T.S.), which details how mentorship exists and engenders the ideal working environment. These phases characterize the most definite relationship between the mentors and mentees, specifically the deans and their faculty members. This study further ignites desirable effects and outcomes holistically and to enhance more mentorship style and how a mentee will transcend positively.
El factor de impacto mide la media del número de citaciones recibidas en un año por trabajos publicados en la publicación durante los dos años anteriores.
© Clarivate Analytics, Journal Citation Reports 2025
SJR es una prestigiosa métrica basada en la idea de que todas las citaciones no son iguales. SJR usa un algoritmo similar al page rank de Google; es una medida cuantitativa y cualitativa al impacto de una publicación.
Ver másSNIP permite comparar el impacto de revistas de diferentes campos temáticos, corrigiendo las diferencias en la probabilidad de ser citado que existe entre revistas de distintas materias.
Ver más



