metricas
covid
Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio Ventilated facade system: A review
Journal Information
Visits
7158
Vol. 64. Issue 3.
(May - June 2025)
Full text access
Ventilated facade system: A review
Sistema de fachada ventilada: una revisión
Visits
7158
Sara Medeiros dos Santos Pizzatto, Fernando Pizzatto, Fabiano Raupp-Pereira, Sabrina Arcaro, Elidio Angioletto, Oscar Rubem Klegues Montedo
Corresponding author
okm@unesc.net

Corresponding author.
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência e Engenharia de Materiais – PPGCEM, Laboratório de Cerâmica Técnica – CerTec, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense – UNESC, Criciúma (SC), Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (22)
Show moreShow less
Tables (3)
Table 1. Main characteristics present in each definition of the ventilated facade system available in the literature.
Tables
Table 2. Description of the main technical standards applied to the ventilated facade systems.
Tables
Table 3. Thermal performance of the VFS.
Tables
Show moreShow less
Abstract

A ventilated facade can be understood as a cladding system fixed to the external wall of the building using mechanical anchor points. The ventilated facade, in addition to its aesthetic effect, improves the thermal (thermal comfort), acoustic and energy efficiency performance of the building. The ventilated facade (or facade) system (VFS) is a construction alternative using non-adhered industrialised elements. Its use has increased substantially in recent years and it has been chosen by architects as a suitable solution for retrofitting existing buildings and for buildings to be built. It is an envelope solution that is suitable for a variety of building types, climates and design configurations. The influence of VFS on the thermal, energy and acoustic performance of buildings is a current topic of research and can be characterised as a sustainable solution in the construction industry. The aim of this article is to present the state of the art of current literature on the application of VFS technologies, in terms of thermal, energy and acoustic analysis, the performance of different coatings applied, fixing systems and the advantages and disadvantages of the system, in order to provide guidelines for future studies and projects.

Keywords:
Building systems
Facades
Ventilated facade
Performance
Review
Resumen

Una fachada ventilada puede entenderse como un sistema de revestimiento fijado a la pared exterior del edificio mediante puntos de anclaje mecánicos. La fachada ventilada, además de su efecto estético, mejora las prestaciones térmicas (comodidad térmica), acústicas y de eficiencia energética del edificio. El sistema de fachada ventilada (o fachada) (SFV) es una alternativa constructiva que utiliza elementos industrializados no adheridos. Su uso se ha incrementado sustancialmente en los últimos años, y ha sido elegido por los arquitectos como una solución adecuada para la rehabilitación de edificios existentes, y para edificios por construir. Es una solución de envolvente adecuada para una gran variedad de tipos de edificios, climas y configuraciones de diseño. La influencia del SFV en el rendimiento térmico, energético y acústico de los edificios es un tema actual de investigación, y puede caracterizarse como una solución sostenible en el sector de la construcción. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar el estado actual de la literatura sobre la aplicación de las tecnologías del SFV, en términos de análisis térmico, energético y acústico, el rendimiento de los diferentes revestimientos aplicados, los sistemas de fijación y las ventajas e inconvenientes del sistema, con el fin de proporcionar directrices para futuros estudios y proyectos.

Palabras clave:
Sistemas de construcción
Fachadas
Fachada ventilada
Rendimiento
Revisión
Full Text
Introduction

Architecture is constantly evolving, adapting to the cultural and technological trends experienced over time. As a result, there is a need to develop new solutions for building systems and overcome challenges in design, construction and operations, especially in the case of facades and especially in relation to performance. The facade is one of the building's basic elements. For architecture, the facade of a building, in addition to its aesthetic effect, is also important due to its impact on energy efficiency [1] and represents the link between external environmental factors and the internal demands of users [2]. Facade cladding systems have a significant effect on the performance and durability of buildings, contributing to watertightness, property valuation and aesthetic finish [3]. In addition, it determines user satisfaction in relation to perceived serviceability and safety under operational conditions, offering basic requirements related to water non-permeability, fire resistance and overall structural performance [4].

Conventional facades with adhered coatings have a high incidence of pathologies [5] and delays in completion. Weathering processes, deterioration of materials, problems with humidity, resulting in wear and tear of joints and seals, corrosion of metal parts, degradation of insulation and conditions of use reduce the facade's performance over time [6]. The conventional building skin facades are also known for presenting numerous problems, such as glare, especially in buildings with a high glazing layer located in hot climate regions, and reduced thermal comfort, resulting in increased energy consumption through the use of air conditioning units [7].

The facade has evolved in complexity over time, encompassing functionality and high performance [6]. In addition, it usually avoids the presence of moisture in the walls of buildings that causes deterioration of materials and impacts on human health [8]. Design and application of new facade concepts are fundamental and must be able to provide security, mitigation of air and water infiltration, thermal and acoustic insulation, solar control, natural lighting, glare control, pleasing aesthetics and, at the same time, minimise energy demand [6,9].

Buildings represent the main energy demand in many countries. Thus, the generation and use of green energy, sustainable energy solutions, responsible building systems and reducing carbon emissions have become important issues that have been debated frequently in recent years by government and non-government leaders [10], and can be associated with new elements of construction, especially VFS.

Sustainable development requires the creation of innovative facades that can harmonise the relationship between people and the natural environment [1], with a focus on smart facades in the architectural sector [11]. These facades combine resources, materials and technologies that alter their properties with changes in climate and/or occupancy, with the aim of maintaining the occupant's internal comfort while being subject to minimal energy demand [12]. These factors (resources, materials and technology) have fostered the evolution of complex multi-layer facade constructions with components designed to fulfil specific functions. Intelligent facades facilitate dynamic adaptation to changing environmental conditions. The result of this evolution in facade technology is the availability of high-performance products and materials [6]. An example of an innovative facade is the double-skin facade. According to Pomponi et al. [13], a double-skin facade is a hybrid system made up of the building's own facade, which constitutes the inner skin, and a glazed outer skin. The two layers are separated by an air cavity with fixed or controllable inlets and outlets. Unlike sealed buildings, the double-skin facades do not create a definitive barrier between the internal conditions of the building and the external environment. In order to reduce the energy demand of buildings and improve the aesthetic appearance, different types of double-skin facade have now been specified as a building envelope, as a change in the priorities by which modern buildings are constructed has taken place over the years. Nowadays, the creation of a sustainable working environment, with human comfort and energy efficiency, has been considered a high priority in construction and has gained emphasis and prominence [14] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Number of papers published per year related to the terms “Ventilated Facade” and “Ventilated Facade”.

A ventilated wall is a double-skin envelope, but differs in its construction and operating mode [14]. The main purpose of the double-skin facade is to utilise solar radiation during the season when the building needs heating [15]. The outer layer of the double-skin facade is generally made up of transparent elements and there are ventilation openings in the outer layer and inner wall; in this way, external air is circulated by opening air into the interior of the building [14]. In the case of ventilated facades, the main objective is to dissipate the heat generated by solar heating by means of the stack effect in the cavity [15]. They are opaque; only the outer layer has openings. Therefore, external air circulation is achieved through the air space between the outer layer and the inner wall [14]. Fig. 2 shows a picture of a building containing a ventilated facade with porcelain tiles.

Fig. 2.

Shopping JK Iguatemi, São Paulo, SP – Brazil. Building characterized by the use of a ventilated facade with porcelain tiles.

Source: Eliane [16].

Architecture, as well as the construction sector, has shown a special interest in ventilated facades in recent years [2,5,17]. The use of the ventilated facade system (VFS) offers a variety of external claddings and the possibility of selecting a wide range of materials, colours and cladding sizes [2]. They are based on a special type of envelope, where a second layer (or skin) is placed in front of a normal building façade [17]. Improvements to building envelope layers have a high potential to increase the energy performance of the building, especially in summer [17,18] and can improve the acoustic characteristics and day lighting inside the building [17]. The performance of the building envelope must guarantee thermal comfort in internal environments, as well as limiting energy consumption and waste, satisfying environmental and technological requirements [15].

Currently, it is possible to identify a notable number of studies and articles related to “ventilated envelopes”, mainly centred on investigating the main characteristics that affect the building's energy performance [2,19]. There are several studies related to the double-skin facade, photovoltaic integrated building, solar chimney and facade solar collectors [2,5,20–24]. In some cases, VFS is combined with building-integrated photovoltaic panels or thermal collectors [25].

Studies on VFS are limited [2,5], including reviews on the subject. For example, the review by Ibañez-Puy et al. [2] included information from different studies carried out that address the thermal and energy performance of VFS in recent years, while the review by De Gracia et al. [17] covered an overview of different types of numerical modelling to describe the thermal response of VFS. However, VFS has evolved greatly in recent years.

Therefore, this review, carried out from 2002 to 2024, aims to provide a comprehensive set of information on VFS for architects, engineers and researchers, bringing together the various definitions of the system over time, addressing historical aspects related to the evolution of the system, the various existing typologies, the classification and description of the system, the efficiencies and deficiencies and the architectural aspects, emphasising the thermal performance and innovations of the system.

Definitions

The use of ventilated structures in buildings has been a widely used solution in contemporary architecture.

According to Herzog, “it is meaningful to speak of the building envelope as a ‘skin’ and not just a ‘protection’, something that ‘breathes’, that reacts to the climate and environmental conditions between inside and outside, similar to humans” [26].

There are many definitions of the ventilated facade system. It came about with the aim of having an enveloping layer that combined the aesthetic point of view with an application of value [26].

The ventilated facade concept is derived from the curtain wall system, with an air chamber, which can have open or watertight joints [5]. Both systems are characterised by being a non-adhered system installed using metal inserts or a metal substructure with an air chamber [10,27]. What differentiates them is that, in the case of VFS, the air in this chamber is constantly renewed by an upward flow of air. Therefore, every ventilated facade is considered a curtain wall, but not the other way round.

Huang et al. [28] reported that a curtain wall is characterised by any building wall in any type of material that does not support superimposed vertical loads, i.e., an unsupported wall. The curtain wall provides aesthetic, environmental and structural functions in order to achieve the closure of the structure necessary for the safety, comfort and functionality of users. Due to technological developments in manufacturing and construction, over the years glass and steel panels have been produced at reduced cost for the construction of lightweight and aesthetically popular facades in modern buildings, especially tall and historic ones. Today, glass has become the most popular type of facade.

According to Boafo et al. [10], a curtain wall is a prefabricated facade, made up of glass and panels of various materials, which completely or partially surrounds a metal building structure, forming a barrier against the weather. The curtain walls are anchored to the slabs of the building, hanging like a curtain, are non-load-bearing and are designed to span several floors. The curtain wall system is a set of glass units, opaque panel units and connecting metal structures or joints. The curtain wall can have different appearances, but are characterised by being closely spaced vertical and horizontal uprights, i.e., metal structure overlaid with glass, metal or composite panels.

The ventilated facade is a double-skin facade, which is industrialised in the concept of a multi-layer composed of two opaque layers and a ventilation channel between them [5].

The new ventilation concepts of VFS are characterized as the so-called double-skin facades [29], which have appropriate openings on the external facade and regular windows on the facade bounded by the building. The installation of a second transparent facade at the front of the building with horizontal ventilation grilles makes it possible to reduce the effects of pressure fluctuations and facilitate natural ventilation.

According to Safer et al. [30], the double-skin facade is a special type of envelope in which a second skin, usually made of transparent glass, is placed in front of a regular building facade. The empty space in the middle is called a channel. This is ventilated naturally, mechanically or using a hybrid system, which is intended to reduce overheating problems in summer and contribute to energy savings in winter.

Ding et al. [31] stated that the double-skin facade is made up of an external facade, which is usually made of glass and offers weather protection and improved acoustic insulation against external noise, an intermediate space and an internal facade. The air in the intermediate space is heated by solar radiation. With openings in the facades, the air flow through the intermediate space is activated by the chimney effect.

There are many synonyms for ventilated facade, for example active facade, double envelope, rainscreen or double-skin facade (DSF) [25], also called smart facades due to their energy-saving potential [32].

The conventional double facade is effective at reducing heat demand, but has limitations when it comes to reducing cooling demand. Therefore, in order to improve overall energy performance, the double facade can be modified [33].

The VFS, which is a double-skin facade, can be combined with photovoltaic panels integrated into the construction and over the last 15 years has become a growing and important architectural element in buildings [9]. Vertical installation takes the form of a double-skin facade with photovoltaic panels facing south or west [34]. Combining photovoltaic systems with a double facade can reduce energy demand and can be called an integrated photovoltaic building. The possibility of adding a water system to the cavity of the double facade can absorb a potential amount of heat, achieving the goal of reducing cooling demand and maintaining thermal comfort [33].

The possibility of varying different types of glass in the composition of the double facade, such as low-emissivity (low-E), electrochromic (EC) and thermochromic (TC) glass, can be altered in order to improve the energy and thermal performance of double facades [33].

Ventilated facades can be called opaque ventilated facade (OVF). This is a type of facade that absorbs solar energy and transfers it to the ventilation system [35].

The term open joint ventilated facades (OJVF) can also be used [25]. The open joint ventilated facades are a special type of ventilated facade, double envelope, double skin, advanced integrated facade or lightweight facade. There is no general agreement on a proper name for these facade typologies [36]. The OJVF is a building system that is widely used as an element to protect against solar radiation, so it is important to characterise the natural phenomena of convection [37].

These facades are marked by localised discontinuities at the joints, which makes the flow much more complex, inhomogeneous and asymmetrical [38]. The outer layer is usually specified with ceramic material [39] or metal [40].

There are various definitions of the ventilated facade system available in the literature. Table 1 summarizes the main characteristics of each existing definition.

Table 1.

Main characteristics present in each definition of the ventilated facade system available in the literature.

Work  Main characteristics 
Agathokleous and Kalogirou [9]  Two parallel slabs separated by a gap with an upward air flow between them as double skin ventilated facades (DSVF). 
De Masi et al. [41]  Typically made up of an external wall, on which a layer of insulation material is fixed, and a cladding system; between these an open-air chamber is created.The chimney effect determines the thermo-hygrometric behaviour of a ventilated facade. 
For Sánchez et al. [25]  Ventilated facades with opaque cladding (OVF) can be represented by the use of a continuous insulation layer adjacent to the internal wall and a protective external layer, formed by a cladding mechanically fixed to the wall, creating a naturally ventilated duct.The term “ventilated facade” is more appropriate for opaque building elements. 
Müller and Alarcon [27]  Characterised by the existence of ventilation in an air chamber, which causes the air to flow upwards due to its heating inside the chamber.Pressure differences inside the air chamber caused by the action of the wind also contribute to ventilation. 
Suárez et al. [36]  The open-joint ventilated facade (OJVF) is a way of making the external closure; a metal structure is fixed to the masonry wall, which acts as a support.The external tiles (ceramic, metal, stone, etc.) are mounted on this structure, creating an air chamber between this layer and the main wall.The small gaps left between the tiles are called “open joints” that allow the facade to be ventilated effectively. 
Giancola et al. [38]  Ventilated facades use a system generally made up of a continuous insulating layer applied to the wall of the building, while another layer is fixed to the building using mechanical fixing systems.There is a naturally ventilated chamber between the two layers. 
Balocco [42]  Multifunctional thermodynamic system used to associate the external characteristics of the facade with the passive behaviour of the building.The air duct can be independent or integrated with other systems.These systems can be heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC). 
Gratia and de Herde [43]  There is a pressure difference in double facades.The air chamber is in contact with the outside air through openings at the top and bottom, so that pressure equalisation takes place.The colder and denser outside air forces its way into the air chamber, raising the pressure at the bottom and causing the air to rise through the chamber and be expelled at the top. 
Patania et al. [44]  Consists of an external cladding with a structure attached to the wall of the building, an insulating material and a metal structure that supports the cladding and the insulating material.The air flow, due to the pressure difference inside the ventilated duct, transfers heat by natural convection. 
Gonçalves and Lopes [45]  Characterised by the existence of an aluminium or stainless-steel structure, fixed to the building's sealing wall at an average distance of between 10 and 15cm.The facade's finishing material (ceramic tiles or glass) is applied over this structure, forming a complete second skin on the building.This structural design creates an air chamber between the building wall and the facade cladding. 
Stazi et al. [46]  External cladding system fixed to the building using mechanical fixing points.There are four functional layers: the external cladding, the ventilation chamber, the continuous insulating layer and the internal wall. 
Rahiminejad and Khovalyg [47]  Three main layers that make up the ventilated wall: a wall close to the inside of the building, a cladding exposed to the open air and an air chamber formed between the two walls.The ventilated air chamber has two openings, an inlet and an outlet, to allow air to flow from the bottom to the top. 

Thus, considering the different point of view showed in Table 1, a ventilated facade system may be considered to be an aesthetical double parallel wall enclosing a chamber that, due to a pressure difference between the exterior and interior of the chamber, promotes an upward air flow to promote thermal and acoustic insulation of the building.

Brief history

VFS is a multi-layer cladding system originally developed in northern European countries [2,26]. As mentioned before, VFS is a system derived from the curtain wall. The curtain wall facades have been adopted all over the world as a characteristic sign of modern architecture [10]. The first fully glazed curtain wall structure dates from 1851. The Crystal Palace in London was designed by Sir Joseph Paxton. The building was an enormous glass and iron exhibition hall [10]. It consisted of a complex network of iron bars supporting transparent glass walls. The main body of the building was 563m long and 124m wide; the height of the central transept was 33m, with a total area of around 92,000m2[48]. The introduction of this architectural typology was prompted by the need to reduce the wall's footprint, construction time and the weight of the structure; this results in material and transport savings, structural flexibility, improved natural lighting, architectural layout flexibility and structural economy and independence [10].

However, curtain wall facades are examples of unventilated double-skin constructions. In 1849, Jean-Baptiste Jobard, director of the Brussels Industrial Museum, described the earliest citation of a mechanically ventilated multi-skin facade. He stated that the winter warm air should circulate between two panes of glass, while in summer the air should be cool [49].

Another early example of a double-skin facade was made by the American botanist Edward Morse. He developed what could be the first working multiple walls. His observations of the heating process of dark curtains led him to build a solar wall in 1882 [50].

The first double-skin facade installed in a real building was seen in Giengen, Germany in 1903 [51,52]. Richard Steiff designed a toy factory for his father [50], with an architectural typology that allows external ventilation of the cavity, thus being considered one of the first examples of a naturally ventilated multi-skin façade [49]. The double skin was installed taking into account the strong winds and cold climate of the region and the intention to maximise natural daylight [51]. The architectural typology adopted proved to be efficient and two extensions were built in 1904 and 1908 using the same double-skin system [50]; however, for both extensions, there was a change in material. For the first building, steel was used for the structure and for the extensions, wood was used for budgetary reasons. All the buildings are still in use [53].

In 1904, the Post Office Savings Bank was built in Vienna, Austria [50]. The building was designed by Otto Wagner, winner of the Post Office Savings Bank competition. The building was constructed in two phases from 1904 to 1912 (the year of completion) and has a double-skinned skylight in the bank's main hall [53], which is still in use by the same owner [50].

The great modernist architect Charles-Edouard Jeanneret-Gris, better known as Le Corbusier, put a lot of effort into projects of this type [50]. At the beginning of the 20th century, Le Corbusier used projects with double facades, such as Centrosoyus (1928) in Moscow, La Cité de Refuge (1929) and Immeuble Clarté (1930) in Paris [53]. The architect pointed to the ability of ventilated double facades to mediate in a controlled manner the variation of the external climate as the main benefit, calling it the Mur neutralizant concept [54], in which Le Corbusier claimed that heat transmission losses and gains would disappear through the circulation of air in the envelope cavity. The architect did not realise that the circulating air required energy to be heated or cooled. The idea was abandoned due to inefficiency and high costs. Le Corbusier carried out some experiments at the Saint Gobain glass company [49].

The double-skin facade was introduced in the early 1900s, but little progress was made until the 1990s [55].

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, mechanically ventilated facades began to be implemented in buildings, mainly in Europe, as a reflection of the energy crises of 1973 and 1979. The main objective was to reduce losses in winter and minimise solar gains in summer. Energy efficiency and thermal comfort ceased to be a problem exclusive to Nordic countries with cold climates [49].

Giancola et al. [38] stated that natural ventilated walls have become an established technology, resulting from spontaneous architectural construction techniques, which involve the use of natural materials attached to wooden supports, which in turn are mechanically fixed to the building. The aim of this technique was mainly to use it to protect the external surface of the wall from rain.

In the 1990s, growing environmental concerns, both from a technical and political point of view, began to influence architectural design, making green buildings seen as a good image for corporate architecture [53].

In recent years, double-skin facades have become a growing architectural element [9]. This system is currently used in several countries, where companies exploit this market and have the technology to implement the system.

In Brazil, this system is still not widespread; the first works using this system were carried out in 2000 [56], but the country has the technology to develop an appropriate VFS system for use in the country [27].

Thus, since the nineteen centuries in the northern European countries, VFS has been used as an aesthetic and thermal insulation solution for modern buildings around the world. However, its function has been meeting another application, as will be discussed in the following.

Typologies of the ventilated facade system

The use of intelligent facades is a crucial criterion for the development of environmentally benign built environments [57].

The thermal, energy and acoustic performance of VFS depends on a number of specific external parameters [2]. Implications of external environmental conditions and design decisions, i.e. the properties of facade components and the building itself, directly influence facade performance [2,36]. It is important to customise facade design according to specific local climatic conditions. The facade should be designed to cope with situations with the lowest possible energy consumption. Commonly, the facade configuration should be designed considering the most unfavourable season [2].

Various types of VFS have been studied, according to different criteria in terms of:

  • (i)

    type and size of the channels;

  • (ii)

    factors linked to the site, such as solar radiation, wind direction, exposure and speed, temperature [2] and exposure [40], which determine the site's microclimate;

  • (iii)

    type of external cladding, such as the characteristics of the materials next to the channel and of the inner layer [25], the material of the external panel, the distribution and position of the openings, the radiating properties of the external panel; and

  • (iv)

    the size and shape of the space between the wall and the external panel [32]. In the case of low wind speeds (<0.5m/s), the greater the temperature gradient, the more cooling by the buoyancy-driven effect is achieved [2].

Climatic conditions do not change constantly. Therefore, an important simplification can be assumed. For summer, consider sunny days and high temperatures, and for winter, cloudy days and low temperatures [2].

In regions with high levels of solar radiation, VFS keeps the temperature of the internal layer of buildings at a temperature close to ambient, due to the significant reduction in the impact of incident radiation on the internal environment. When ventilated walls, facades and roofs are well designed, they can help to considerably reduce summer thermal loads due to direct solar radiation [58].

With regard to the design decision, consideration should be given to the material of the outer layer, the joints, the specific design (geometry), the materials [2], the width and height of the ventilation channel, the type of external cladding, the characteristics of the materials that are placed adjacent to the channel and the material of the inner layer [40], in addition to the geometry and thermal characteristics [36]. These parameters can be chosen according to each project [2].

Many parameters have an impact on the system's behaviour and the building's energy budget and can be divided into two main categories [46]:

  • (a)

    external boundary conditions. A ventilated facade is a type of facade that absorbs solar energy and transfers it to the ventilation system. Therefore, the ventilation load of the heating system can be reduced in winter [35]. The energy savings of this system depend heavily on climatic variables, such as the geographical location of the building and especially the solar radiation on the facade, the ambient temperature and the wind speed [35,46];

  • (b)

    design choices related to the dimensions (width and height of the ventilation gap), external cladding material and configuration of the joints, which can be open or closed [46]. In the case of a continuous external panel or with closed joints between the panels, ventilation is possible due to the openings at the bottom and top of the air chamber. When the joints are open, they allow outside air to enter and exit the cavity along the wall. In these cases, the joints deal with various expansions caused by temperature changes [5].

Regarding the external panel, facades can be divided into three groups: sealed cavity facade, facade with closed joints and with open grilles (at the top and bottom) and facade with open joints and open grilles [32]. Sealed cavity facades are those in which the air cavity and the outside air are not connected. Closed-joint facades with open grilles are those in which the cavity is in contact with the outside air and there is air flow through the cavity. Facades with open joints and open grilles represent the most common construction. The model with closed joints and open grilles is simpler than the model with open joints and grilles and can therefore be used to describe both situations [58].

There are two types of external cladding on ventilated facades: continuous, with closed joints, or discontinuous, with open joints [38]. In continuous or closed-joint ventilated facades, the upward flow is continuous, homogeneous and symmetrical along the wall [2,38,44]. In open-joint ventilated facades, the flow is discontinuous and is marked by discontinuities located at the joints, making the flow complex, inhomogeneous and asymmetrical [2,21,38]. This type of facade allows external air to enter and leave the cavity along the wall. Apart from aesthetic and constructive reasons, the main interest in open-joint ventilated facades is their ability to reduce thermal cooling loads. This occurs through the buoyancy effect induced by solar radiation inside the ventilated cavity, where air enters and exits freely through the joints [21].

The outer panels are separated by horizontal and vertical joints in order to resolve expansions caused by temperature changes. This effect is the result of solar radiation and the resulting convection inside the cavity. The flow of rising air creates a ventilation effect that helps to remove heat from the facade (Giancola et al. [38]). Open joints influence air velocity. The higher the air velocity in the ventilated facade, the greater the cooling effect [2]. Therefore, to minimise heat loss during the winter, smaller openings should be chosen. If the aim is to increase the ventilation rate to prevent overheating, it is advisable to use larger openings. The cooling effect also increases with height [41].

The configuration of the joints (geometric factors) in the external skin of the ventilated facade, with the presence of ventilation joints, which can be open or closed, influences the performance of the VFS [41,59]. There is a consensus that larger and larger joint openings help to reduce heat loss in winter and prevent overheating in summer [60].

The internal wall, with basic thermal insulation and watertightness properties, is mostly made of solid materials, such as concrete or masonry, and covered with insulating materials [60].

Among the types of double-skin facade, there is a simple and interesting alternative for utilising solar radiation in a building. Both solid layers are opaque. The outer layer is used to absorb solar energy and transfer some of it to the air in the gap. The inner layer acts as an insulation layer, avoiding the risk of overheating in the summer, while some of the solar energy can be used to heat the ventilation air in the winter. These are the opaque ventilated facades (OVF) [35].

Sánchez et al. [25] analysed the influence of the characteristics of the materials adjacent to the channel and the material of the inner layer.

So, the several different existing types of VFS are a resulting of the external parameters (temperature, air velocity, among many others), climate conditions (solar radiation level, unexpected climatic events, for example), design characteristics (aesthetic, kind of materials, geometric factors, for example), among others, that cause a direct impact in the thermal and acoustic performance of the building.

Classifications of ventilated facades

When it comes to ventilated facades, there is no agreement on their proper name. This type of building facade solution can be categorised according to different criteria. According to Suárez et al. [36], the International Energy Agency classifies advanced integrated facades according to the type of ventilation, the air path and the configuration of the facade, mainly related to the materials used. Some of the characteristics analysed are the properties of the facade components and the building itself, such as geometric, physical, thermal and optical properties, energy performance and control optimisation.

It is common knowledge that the main benefit of VFS is heat dissipation. This feature arises from the outer cladding absorbing the incident solar radiation and the ventilation conducted by natural convection in the ventilated cavity. The inner layer of the system acts as an insulator for the building. There is also a conducted buoyancy effect in the ventilated cavity, which pushes hot air out of the system, allowing cold air to enter the interior [61]. Fig. 3 shows the entry of cold air and the exit of hot air through the ventilated air chamber, the so-called chimney effect.

Fig. 3.

Chimney effect in the ventilated facade system.

The differences between the densities of the outside and inside air, caused by different temperatures and humidity levels, cause thrust forces to occur. The removal of hot air from the facade also occurs due to the forces exerted by the wind [61,62].

According to Pujadas-Gispert et al. [61], the characteristics reported among the functions of ventilated facades are: the external facade will absorb the incident solar radiation, the heat will be distributed by convection in the ventilated cavities and air fluctuations will be generated between the slabs and the external cladding due to the temperature difference, which will push the hot air out and allow cooler air to enter, providing a natural upward air current through the ventilated layer.

There is a high level of congruence between the characteristics of building envelope layers and the visual, acoustic and thermal comfort of interior spaces [57].

Thus, the classification of VFS includes the type of ventilation, the air path and the configuration of the facade, aimed to heat dissipation. The type of the used materials assumes an important role in this classification beyond the properties of the building itself (thermal property and energy performance, for example).

Descriptions of the ventilated facade system

When it comes to the compositional elements, the VFS generally consists of a rear wall, also called the inner panel, on which a layer of insulating material is placed, and a cladding system that creates an open-air gap, also called a ventilated air chamber between the insulated wall and the outside environment [41,44], as shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Detail of a ventilated facade system.

The interior panel, also called the supporting wall, is a confined masonry wall supported by the building's load-bearing structure. It serves as the base for the system's metal substructure. The inner panel is generally made up of solid materials such as bricks and concrete and covered with insulating materials [63]. The inner layer acts as building insulation [2].

The thermal insulation is a continuous layer over the entire height of the support. Closed pore insulation such as polyurethane foam is usually used, but open pore insulation such as mineral wool, expanded polystyrene (EPS) and extruded polystyrene (XPS) can be used [63].

The ventilated air chamber acts as a thermal buffer. It reduces heat loss during cold days, unwanted heat gain during hot days and thermal discomfort caused by asymmetrical thermal radiation [64]. Its main function is to remove excess heat and humidity accumulated in the chamber by convection and to prevent rainwater from passing into the building, draining off what can infiltrate. The behaviour of the ventilation channel can vary depending on the reciprocal positions of the thermal insulation and the inertial mass [40]. The purpose of this cavity, which is created between the internal and external environments, is to positively exploit natural ventilation, solar radiation and thermal insulation [15].

The “chimney effect” that occurs in the air chamber is excellent during the summer, saving energy and solving durability problems due to atmospheric agents and aggressive solar radiation [39,65]. This effect is also effective in winter [39,66]. The ventilated air cavity increases the transfer of heat and humidity between the internal and external parts, and helps to make the building envelope more efficient [63].

In the air chamber there is continuous ventilation in the vertical direction. The intensity of the chimney effect depends on the temperature difference between the internal and external air and the height of the internal air column [43]. The cavity must be designed in such a way as to reduce pressure losses along the channel [41]. It is possible to achieve a sensible heat cooling effect due to solar radiation when the width of the chimney air cavity is greater than 7cm [42], but the average thickness is typically 10–15cm [2]. Energy savings tend to increase as the width of the air duct increases up to a maximum of 15cm [66], although acceptable performances can be achieved with air cavity widths between 10 and 24cm [59]. It is important to emphasise that an increase in the width of the ventilated air chamber leads to an increase in construction complexity, resulting in high costs related to the execution of the work [2]. The work of Lin, Song and Chu [60] showed that the width of the chamber is a characteristic that significantly affects performance in winter, but this is not the case in summer. The 20cm wide chamber provided the most robust airflow rate for the open-joint ventilated facade in summer, leading to a considerable reduction in thermal load, especially with intensive solar radiation. In winter, the chamber offered the best and most reliable insulation performance for a closed-joint facade without air vents.

The height of the chamber is an important parameter for convective thermal performance [8]. The cooling effect increases with the height of the chamber in relation to ground level [39]. Higher chamber heights are recommended in order to increase the drive pressure difference for ventilation [8]. Air temperature differences in ventilated air chambers of greater heights are considerably greater, favouring air flow [39]. Facades at lower heights receive a greater share of the radiation reflected from the ground and are less influenced by the action of the wind [40,41]. According to Zöllner, Winter and Viskanta [29], in built-up buildings, the gap distance between the transparent facade varies from 0.3 to 1.5m and considering a typical storey height of around 4m, this results in a box window height/internal facade distance ratio, H/S, of between around 3 and 15.

The fixing system consists of vertical aluminium profiles and stainless-steel metal inserts. The external cladding or outer panel is made up of large-format modular panels in various types of material. It defines the external image of the building while configuring the ventilated air chamber. The joints in these plates can remain open and allow outside air to enter and leave the cavity along the entire wall, as well as combating expansions caused by temperature changes [2]. In some applications, the joints between the plates are closed or the outer skin is continuous. For these cases, ventilation occurs due to openings at the bottom and top of the cladding [2]. According to Lin, Song and Chu [60], the factor that most interferes with performance in summer and winter is the opening rate of the surface joint. This is due to the way in which the joint opening ratio of the outer skin affects the ventilation mechanism of the air chamber and the solar irradiation reaching the inner wall surface. In terms of thermal performance, these factors have opposite impacts. In summer, the increase in joint openings will allow outside air to enter and leave the chamber along the entire wall in order to dissipate the accumulated heat; however, the increase in unwanted solar heat also reaches the inner wall through the openings. In winter, the ventilation/irradiation relationship is also present, but it behaves in the opposite way. The intensity of solar heat reaches the surface of the wall through the openings, but is eliminated due to the chamber's improved ventilation.

When it comes to the external panel material, low thermal conductivity (k), high density (ρ) and high specific heat values (cp) are recommended [41,44].

The (external) finish colour has a significant impact on the heat transfer rates of a VFS in summer. The adoption of materials with low solar radiation absorption coefficients is recommended [60]. According to Lin, Song and Chu [60], in summer, the impact of the colour of the external cladding is the second most significant factor, second only to the rate of joint opening. Light colours applied to external cladding can reduce daytime heat gain while increasing the night-time cooling effect in summer, lowering daily heat transfer rates compared to dark colours.

In summary, it is clear that the chimney effect is the main phenomena related to the air flow that causes the thermal insulation in the VFS. The temperature difference between the internal and external air and the height of the internal air assumes a critical role. Moreover, the drive pressure difference for ventilation is improved at higher chamber heights, favouring air flow and the maintenance of higher air temperature differences. Although there is no consensus among authors regarding the ideal dimensions of the cavity to obtain the best chimney effect, the width of the chimney air cavity can be considered to be typically between 10 and 15cm to guarantee the best energy savings.

Materials used as coverings

VFS has seen an expansion in use due to the possibility of hosting different types of cladding, allowing architects to explore a wide variety of facade combinations [19]. The materials used in building envelopes play an important role in terms of sustainability, taking into account the energy performance of the facade. Materials influence indoor thermal comfort; insulation is used for heating as well as cooling in order to save energy [67].

There are various types of materials used to make up the cladding of the ventilated facade system (Figs. 5–7). This classification will determine the system's fixing system.

Fig. 5.

Copa Star Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, RJ – Brazil. Ventilated facade composed of porcelain tiles.

Source: Eliane [16].

Fig. 6.

Ripagaina Park residential building, Pamplona, Navarra – Spain. Ventilated facade made of aluminum composite material.

Source: Alu-Stock Lontana Group [68].

Fig. 7.

Alquería Market in Dos Hermanas – Seville. Ventilated facade made of polymer concrete.

Source: Ulma [69].

The behaviour of the facade is different depending on the external cladding material used [32]. The outer layer acts mainly as a radiation filter [2]. The materials currently used in the construction industry consist of modular panels with a variety of cladding options, available in metal, ceramic or composite materials [2,5], precast concrete, glass or aluminium [58] and even stone, aluminium composite panels, phenolic boards, cementitious boards, extruded ceramics and wood [25]. Translucent glass, ceramic/porcelain materials, opaque metal or photovoltaic modules are the most common to be used [32]. The cladding can be made of a thin metal, such as zinc-titanium [40].

Facades with outer cladding in reflective materials, such as special steels and titanium alloys, greatly reduce the influence of solar radiation and should be considered as an alternative to ventilated facades [66].

The application of a thicker solid material is also present in VFS, such as brick, ceramics and cement, and can be permeable or watertight [40].

Ceramic materials are reinforced with a composite consisting of a fibreglass mesh and polymer resin adhered to the ceramic plate. The combination of these components aims to guarantee the safety of the material after installation, preventing the release of fragments of the ceramic material in the event of a fracture of the ceramic coating [56].

The selection of materials to be applied in VFS can significantly reduce the environmental impact of buildings (Pujadas-Gispert et al. [61]). Considering the concept of sustainability and versatility, bio-based materials are being considered as promising resources for 21st century buildings and are highly valued [70]. Bio-based materials have a smaller environmental footprint than steel, glass and concrete. Bio-based materials can be produced on site in an environmentally friendly way and have low transport costs. They are renewable and reusable [61]. An example of this type of material is wood, which is a suitable material for the facade interface of the enveloping layer, such as the floors, walls and roof between the interior and exterior of the building, due to its low thermal conductivity [71]. However, these materials have some disadvantages, such as dimensional and thermal instability, low mechanical strength over time, low resistance to biotic and abiotic degradation processes and low fire resistance [61,70].

So, a large number of different types of cladding has allowing architects to design a wide variety of facade combinations, involving metallic materials as steel and aluminium, ceramic materials as precast concrete, glass, stone, porcelain, cementitious boards, extruded ceramics, polymeric materials, natural (as wood) or synthetic (phenolic boards), composite materials and, more recently, photovoltaic modules.

Fastening systems

The VFS fixing system is made up of a metal substructure that allows the installation of cladding plates that are mechanically fixed.

The substructure can be made from aluminium [16]. The cladding is fixed with stainless steel screws. Four concealed fixing systems are used: metal inserts, stick, shackerley and clamp:

  • Metal inserts: this system consists of vertical profiles and point metal inserts. The vertical profiles are installed using anchors, which are fixed to the base of the building with anchor bolts. The metal inserts have fixing pins, which are inserted into the cladding, as shown in Fig. 8;

    Fig. 8.

    Detail of the fixing system with metal inserts – ELIANETEC.

    Source: Eliane [16].

  • Stick: this system consists of an auxiliary substructure made up of profiles, anchors and anchor bolts. The cladding is glued with structural sealant to a frame made up of aluminium profiles. The frame has clips that help it to be fixed to the structure, which is made up of profiles called columns and rafters, previously installed on the facade, as shown in Fig. 9;

    Fig. 9.

    Detail of the Stick fixing system – ELIANETEC.

    Source: Eliane [16].

  • Shackerley: this system consists of anchors, horizontal and vertical profiles, and expansion bolts, which are inserted into the back of the cladding and anchor bolts, fixed to the base of the building, as shown in Fig. 10;

    Fig. 10.

    Detail of the shackerley – ELIANETEC fixing system.

    Source: Eliane [16].

  • Clamp: the cladding is fixed using metal clamps, fitted into slots that are fixed into the cladding. The fasteners are not exposed on the surface of the cladding. The system consists of a substructure with vertical profiles, fixed by means of anchors at the base of the building, as shown in Fig. 11.

    Fig. 11.

    Detail of the ELIANETEC clamp fixing system. Fonte: Eliane [16].

As a visible system, staples are used. The fasteners remain exposed on the surface of the cladding. The cladding is fixed by means of metal clips without the need to make slots or holes in the cladding. The system consists of a substructure with vertical profiles, fixed by means of anchors to the base of the building.

Hilti [72] specifies aluminium framing systems. The solutions are quick and adaptable. The systems adapt to all types of panels. The systems include the anchoring system for fixing to concrete, the anchoring system for fixing to masonry and the screw fixing to concrete:

  • Anchoring system for fixing in concrete: HRD plastic dowels are used in this application. However, whenever conditions are favourable, HUS3 screw anchors are used, which offer greater productivity and can withstand greater loads than traditional dowels;

  • Anchoring system for fixing to masonry: this system is used for solid and perforated brickwork. HRD plastic dowels are the appropriate solution when the forces to be withstood are low. To withstand greater forces, the preference is for HIT-HY 270 and HIT-HY 170 injection chemicals, which are used with HIT-V threaded rods and HIT-SC modular perforated sleeves;

  • Screw anchoring in concrete: screw anchoring is used to fix discontinuous coatings only in cases where the mechanical characteristics of the concrete are known.

Portobello [73] uses an aluminium composite structure, weighing approximately 3.5kg/m2, with screws coated with microceramic and polymer adhesive. The Lungo, Magna and Pendeo systems are used:

  • Lungo system: this is the main system and is designed for standard-sized porcelain tiles. The porcelain tiles are suspended on horizontal profiles and fixed as if they were frames, allowing easy removal for access or maintenance, as shown in Fig. 12;

    Fig. 12.

    Lungo system fixing detail.

    Source: Portobello [73].

  • Magna system: designed to fix thin porcelain tiles to an aluminium structure, withstanding wind pressure and allowing for expansion and movement. The adhesive used has a resistance of 21kg/cm2, as shown in Fig. 13;

    Fig. 13.

    Detail of the Magna system fixing.

    Source: Portobello [73].

  • Pendeo system: designed for products in a specific line, the Lamina Line, which are 300cm×100cm slabs and 3.5mm thick. The porcelain tile is adhered to a support and reinforcement substructure and then installed on the aluminium structure. It was developed for large slabs, as shown in Fig. 14.

    Fig. 14.

    Fixing detail of the Pendeo system.

    Source: Portobello [73].

Although different fixing systems can be found, a metal structure is typically the main support element of the VFS. Stainless steel screws are used to fix the cladding on this structure. The fixing system still uses metal inserts, stick, shackerley and clamp.

ETAG 034 [74] is a European standard that provides guidelines for the European technical assessment of ventilated facade building systems. This guideline covers kits for vertical external wall claddings consisting of an external cladding, mechanically attached to a structure, which is fixed to the external wall of buildings. These claddings are non-structural elements and do not contribute to the stability of the wall on which they are installed. These elements contribute to the durability of the works. The cladding kit consists of an external cladding and defined fixing devices. The cladding is mechanically fixed to the wall using a substructure. Walls are made of masonry (clay, concrete or stone), concrete (cast on site or as prefabricated panels), wood or metal structure. There is an air space between the cladding elements and the external wall. According to the regulations, the air ventilation space must be at least 20mm, which can be reduced locally to 5–10mm depending on the cladding and substructure, as long as it is checked that it does not affect the ventilation function.

The cladding elements are fixed to the external wall by means of a substructure, with wood or metal material (steel, stainless steel or aluminium). Cladding elements are made of wood panels, plastic, fibre-reinforced cement, concrete, metal, laminated panels, stone, ceramics, among other types. These cladding elements are usually assembled according to a detailed technical design, in accordance with the product's technical descriptions.

Through the mechanical design, the cladding is differentiated according to the fastening methods. The standard provides examples of possible materials to be used as cladding elements and fixings, which are referred to as families. The standard presents eight families (A to H) of cladding kits. Other cladding kits can be evaluated based on a similar analysis of these families. Figs. 15–22 were taken from the ETAG 034 standard and illustrate the fixing method for the main families of cladding elements and fixings.

Fig. 15.

Cladding kit mechanically fixed to the substructure using nails, screws, rivets, among others.

Source: ETAG 034 [74].

Fig. 16.

Cladding kit mechanically fastened to the substructure, whereby the fastening is made by means of an undercut hole and anchored by mechanical interlocking.

Source: ETAG 034 [74].

Fig. 17.

Cladding kit with cladding elements fixed to a horizontal grid of metal rails, bolted to a vertical substructure.

Source: ETAG 034 [74].

Fig. 18.

Cladding kit with cladding elements, integrated into the adjacent elements by means of interlocking at the top and bottom, fixed to the substructure by mechanical fixings positioned on the upper edge and masked by the edge of the upper elements.

Source: ETAG 034 [74].

Fig. 19.

Cladding kit with cladding elements fixed to the substructure by means of mechanical fixings positioned on the upper edge and masked by the upper edge.

Source: ETAG 034 [74].

Fig. 20.

Cladding kit with cladding elements mechanically fixed to the substructure by 4 clips (minimum) or metal rails.

Source: ETAG 034 [74].

Fig. 21.

Cladding made up of elements suspended from the substructure.

Source: ETAG 034 [74].

Fig. 22.

Suspended cladding kit.

Source: ETAG 034 [74].

Architectural aspects

The word facade is derived from French and literally means “front” or “face” [1].

Building facades are classified into two categories: glazed facades and opaque facades. Glazed facades are made of transparent or translucent materials, such as glass. Opaque facades are made of solid layers, such as masonry, concrete and stone [67].

The facade of a building is the most visible element and defines the aesthetic appearance, the identity of the building and its architectural expressions. It serves as a physical barrier and an interface between inside and outside and is constantly exposed to meteorological variations, which directly and indirectly affect users’ indoor comfort conditions, such as solar radiation, wind action and large temperature differences [75].

The facade has the ability to function as a protective element or regulator against the strong fluctuations of the external climate [76].

The facade, which is the main component of the building's envelope and which limits the external and internal environments, has an impact on the environmental conditions of internal spaces, on the thermal performance of buildings and, subsequently, on user satisfaction [57]. According to Mirrahimi et al. [77], when drawing up a facade project, a series of parameters must be taken into account, such as the location (orientation and climatic conditions), the shape (width, length and height), the material of the external walls, roofs, glazed areas, natural ventilation, the thermal comfort required by the occupants and external shading. The facade is where some of the most significant heat exchanges between the building and the environment take place, which is why it is an important aspect of a good project aimed at improving a building's thermal performance [37].

Zero-energy building design has become a priority for architects and researchers related to architectural engineering and building physics [78]. In this way, architects and engineers must make important decisions at an early stage of building design, with a view to the final impacts of the construction on the overall energy performance and internal comfort conditions of the buildings [67].

For architecture and engineering, the facade of a building is divided into two parts. The solid part refers to the stable and opaque structural elements, such as solid walls, while the void part refers to the light and transparent structural elements, such as glass, windows and doors. The harmony of these parts can give different appearances to a building [1], as well as being associated with the comfort and well-being of users inside the building. Solid and empty parts need different treatments for sound penetration, lighting, sunlight, air flow and visual penetration for users [1].

Some parameters should be associated with the process of developing a building's facade design [75]:

  • Control of solar utilisation: the comfort level of users is associated with the solar radiation allowed into the building, which directly influences the internal temperature of the building;

  • Natural ventilation: the building skin can control the natural exchange and circulation of air in order to minimise the use of heating and air-conditioning systems;

  • Natural vs artificial lighting: a suitable combination of natural and artificial light is the main objective for minimising energy consumption. The entry of natural light into the space, through the opening of windows and doors in the walls of a building, and shading systems are the main components of any envelope, as they influence internal lighting and the well-being of the user. The challenge is to let daylight in as deeply as possible, reducing overall energy consumption and keeping the individual visual sensation comfortable;

  • View to the outside: through openings in the walls, there is a psychological visual connection between users and the outside;

  • Heat control: a building's thermal performance is directly associated with controlling the flow of heat between the interior and exterior;

  • Moisture control: the building's skin deals with two types of moisture, rainwater and condensation. Rain exposes the facade to external humidity and condensation is formed on cold surfaces inside the room when there is a sudden temperature oscillation between the inside and outside of the building room due to insufficient envelope insulation;

  • Noise: acoustic insulation is a fundamental factor in the performance of a facade, as it is subject to external noise.

Facades are fundamental elements for internal lighting, internal thermal environments and the utilisation and control of solar energy [1]. Contemporary architecture is not limited to the use of materials or surface finishes, but results in a wide variety of materials and their articulations [4].

Today, bioclimatic architecture has become one of the most promising alternatives for reducing energy consumption in buildings and, consequently, reducing the environmental damage that fossil fuels are causing worldwide [79]. Sustainable development requires the creation of innovative facades. The sun provides abundant energy to the earth and it is essential to consider the impact of sunlight on facades and whether it should be reflected, absorbed or reused [1].

Smart facades, as an innovative integrated component of the building envelope, have been developed to correct all the disadvantages of current facades [57]. They are seen as a multiple functional element to reconcile conflicting needs such as heating, cooling, ventilation and lighting [80]. Among the types of intelligent facades are double facades, double-glazed facades, ventilated facades, kinetic facades and solar facades [57]. Curtain walls have also become a popular type of facade. In countries such as China, for example, the curtain facade is architecturally designed by the architect who is not normally involved in the structural design [28].

The design of ventilated facades is not a new topic; however, in recent years, the implementation of ventilated facades in buildings has been the subject of widespread application, especially when low energy consumption has become a priority in building design. VFS attracts architects and engineers for aesthetic reasons, its performance in sound insulation and also for improving the indoor environment [58].

Solar heating and cooling technologies can be driven by solar thermal energy. Solar thermal heating technologies use passive or active solar energy to collect solar radiation and transform the energy into usable heat. Passive refers to the design of the building envelope [20].

The need for energy conservation and sustainable design in buildings is causing new interest in passive solar systems [55,81]. A passive building is one in which the internal environment is regulated not by the operation of mechanical heating and cooling systems, but by the structure and architectural design of the building and its components [55].

According to Marinosci et al. [59], the architect and/or engineer must optimise the natural contribution of heat transfer within the cavity in order to achieve favourable performances from the ventilated walls; the temperature difference between the air and the walls induced by solar radiation and the forced convection component is associated with the wind that pushes external air into the cavity via the grilles at the bottom of the cavity. In order to increase air flow through the cavity, pressure losses along the cavity must be reduced. This can be achieved by eliminating the ventilation grilles at the ends of the cavity and avoiding the low thickness of the cavity. The radiative contribution of long waves (e.g., infrared radiation) inside the cavity must be minimised.

Among the passive solutions, the double-skin facade is attractive and promising [55,81]. The ventilated facade is a double-skin facade and its main architectural feature is its transparency, allowing contact with the building's surroundings and the fact that it lets in a lot of light during the day. The attractive aesthetic value is much sought after by architects, builders and owners [7].

Thus, the design of a VFS currently involves engineering and architectural elements to attempt much more than thermal comfort, such as control of the solar radiation, natural ventilation, a suitable combination of natural and artificial light, view to the outside and acoustic insulation. Such elements promote technical, economic and aesthetic gains.

Technical standards

The purpose of technical standards is to experimentally evaluate facades, as well as to conceptualise and define guidelines for designing the system, among other relevant aspects. Table 2 summarizes the description of the main technical standards.

Table 2.

Description of the main technical standards applied to the ventilated facade systems.

Standard  Description 
ASTM E 631-93a [83]  It defines the curtain facade as a “non-adhered exterior wall that is securely supported by structural members of the building”. 
ASTM E 283 standard [84]  It describes the test method applicable to external windows, curtain walls and doors to measure only the leakage associated with the assembly and not the installation.During the tests, temperature and humidity throughout the specimen must be kept constant; the rate of air leakage through external windows, curtain walls and doors should be under specified pressure differences in the specimen. 
ASTM E 330 [85]  It determines the standard test method for structural performance of external windows, doors, skylights and curtain walls by uniformly distributed static air pressure difference using a test chamber.This test method is applicable to curtain wall assemblies including, but not limited to, metal, glass, masonry and stone components. 
ASTM E 331 [86]  It deals with the assessment of water pressure resistance.This standard determines the standard test method for water penetration of exterior windows, skylights, doors and curtain walls by uniform static air pressure difference.Water is applied to the outer face and exposed edges simultaneously with a uniform static air pressure on the outer face greater than the pressure on the inner face. 
EN 13830:2015 [87]  It specifies the requirements of curtain wall kit intended for use as a building envelope to provide weather resistance, safety in use and energy saving and heat retention and provides test methods, assessment, calculation and conformity criteria of the related performances.It specifies procedures for a facade performance classification by means of experimental tests. The main test procedure includes air permeability, airtightness, serviceability/wind load resistance, air permeability, water vapour permeability, thermal transmittance and airborne sound insulation. 
ETAG 034 [74]  ETAG documents are issued and applied when standards do not cover specific areas.ETAG 034 puts in place performance requirements and test and assessment methods for cladding systems, corresponding to the areas of mechanical strength and stability, fire safety, hygiene, health and the environment, safety in use, noise protection, energy saving and heat retention, durability aspects and ease of service.It is divided into two parts [88]:(1) Part 1: Ventilated cladding kits comprising cladding components and associated fixings; and(2) Part 2: Cladding kits comprising cladding components, associated fixings, substructure and possible insulation layer. 
UNI 11018:2003 [89]  It defines that the ventilated facade is a type of advanced barrier facade (“Facciate a Schermo Avanzato”). It is an opaque facade wall in which the external cladding is made up of various materials or shapes and dry-mounted.The ventilated facade is designed so that the air present in the chamber can flow out via a chimney effect, either naturally or artificially.However, this standard does not address the issue of mechanical degradation over time [90]
DIN 18516-1 [91]  It applies to ventilated external wall cladding with and without substructure, including fasteners, connections and anchors. It defines planning, design and execution principles for permanent constructions.It establishes considerations in relation to design, acting loads, volumetric variations, the execution of the ventilated facade system and the carrying out of tests.The requirements for the design and execution of a ventilated facade system with natural stone slabs or concrete slabs are laid down in DIN 18516-3 [92] and DIN 18516-5 [93]
DIN 18516-3 [92]  It stablishes the requirements and design of external wall cladding and ventilated for natural stone.In conjunction with DIN 18516-1, it regulates the use of natural stone slabs with nominal thicknesses ≥30mm for ventilated external wall cladding. 
DIN 18516-5 [93]  It specifies the requirements and design for concrete block slabs, their fixing and anchoring, as well as calculation and design. In addition, specifications are made for joint formation. 
ISO/TS 17870-3:2023 [94]  It provides guidelines for the installation of large-format porcelain tiles and panels by means of mechanical fixings to support structures, especially on ventilated facades. 

In Brazil, there are no specific standards or regulatory documents that specify the elements that make up the ventilated facade system, which define guidelines for designing, building and maintaining cladding systems; there is no performance assessment regarding safety, habitability, durability and maintenance [82].

Existing standardised approaches include the Brazilian standard ABNT NBR 10821-1 – Frames for buildings – Part 1: External and internal frames – Floor terminology [95], in which the curtain wall facade system is defined as being interconnected and structured frames, with a sealing function, that form a continuous system, developing in the direction of the height and/or width of the building facade, without interruption, for at least two floors. ABNT NBR 10821-2 – Frames for buildings – Part 2: External frames – Requirements and classification [96] specifies the performance requirements for frames for buildings, regardless of the type of material. This standard provides some requirements and assessment methods for structural performance (wind loads) and durability that can be adopted for ventilated cladding systems [27].

Thus, considering the complexity of the ventilated facade systems, for example the used materials and the configurations, the technical standards cannot cover all the relevant aspects related to the performance of the facades as acoustic insulation.

Advantages and disadvantages

Currently, the civil construction sector is concerned about energy efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions [97]. It is, directly or indirectly, the first pillar for the application of technologies aimed at reducing energy waste [15]. VFS is a type of facade system that offers sustainability benefits, the main reason for its popularity being the ease and speed of installation, the rehabilitation of buildings, making it a highly competitive system [98].

According to the literature, VFS present the following advantages compared to conventional facades:

  • ability to reduce heat transfer through the building envelope in summer conditions, as well as preventing the risk of condensation and infiltration in winter caused by wind and rain, thus increasing the durability of the façade [19];

  • building's energy performance, as well as internal comfort and the quality of the internal environment [5,18,36,57,60,63,99]. Besides, poor performance of building materials as an insulation layer can be corrected by the use of VFS [63];

  • aesthetic purposes, guiding the envelope design process [19,60]. This system has become popular with architects because almost any colour and shape can be adopted [21,57];

  • easier maintenance. The incidence of pathologies on conventional cladding facades often necessitates industrialised element alternatives such as VFSs, which feature a dry construction method that is simple, fast and easy to build; this makes them competitive [5,21], due to their simplicity in implementation (Diallo et al. [100]);

  • flexibility and adaptability can be cited as significant attributes for this type of facade, which can be customised to any preferred shape and colour (Ghaffarianhoseini [57]);

  • retrofitting of old buildings. This system offers aesthetic improvements to buildings, both new and refurbished [21,36], and is widely used in the renovation of buildings, in the absence of rules relating to historical-architectural preservation [21,66];

  • reduction of moisture problems within the building envelope by ventilation: rain penetration, frost damage, decay, corrosion, mould growth and discolouration of building materials [5,21,57,60,63,97,99], particularly with regard to the modernization of old buildings [47];

  • minimisation of construction-related problems due to its industrialised components and better assembly control [2];

  • acoustic performance can be improved by VFS [43,63], since the air cavity acts as additional acoustic insulation;

  • ventilated structures can also be extremely useful for installing photovoltaic panels in order to increase their cooling and, consequently, their thermal efficiency [58].

Among the difficulties in implementing the ventilated facade system, the high price and investment cost are considerably higher than those of a traditional simple façade [7]. Besides, VFS need [45,101]:

  • qualified and trained labour;

  • specifications for installation, i.e., the need for a specific detailed project;

  • specific accessories;

  • changes in management and production processes.

Moreover, assessing the performance of ventilated facades is difficult due to the lack of software tools capable of fully evaluating the thermal performance of opaque ventilated facades [101]. There is typically a lack of data on the thermal and energy behaviour of the ventilated facade, specifically a lack of data on the envelope temperature. However, for existing buildings, the performance of a ventilated facade can be assessed using on-site measurements [61].

Thus, as can be seen in the literature, there are many advantages to using ventilated facade systems; however, there are also a series of challenges to be overcome, such as the high installation cost.

Thermal performance

Climate comfort is the most important biological requirement of human beings. Conditions are defined as those in which more than 80% of users feel satisfied. Thus, in order to guarantee the continued health and productivity of users, climatic comfort conditions must be provided in a building [102]. Nowadays, people spend most of their time indoors, such as homes, offices, schools, factories and shopping centres. Numerous studies have been carried out by researchers and architects in order to establish design guidelines with the aim of idealising indoor environments that meet indoor environmental quality requirements [57].

It is well known that energy consumption is a concern all over the world and the civil construction sector is one of the biggest contributors to this consumption [18] and the emission of greenhouse gases [103]. The main elements with the highest energy consumption in buildings are heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems, as they are the internal climate controls that regulate humidity and temperature in order to provide thermal comfort and indoor air quality [20].

The International Energy Agency indicates that residential and commercial buildings are responsible for around 32% of global energy consumption and almost 10% of CO2 emissions related to energy consumption [5]. The building sector is responsible for almost 40% of total CO2 energy-related emissions and 36% of final energy use worldwide [61].

In line with global policies, buildings have significant potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions [57]. Indoor heating is the main energy demand of buildings in cold countries and air conditioning is one of the main contributors to peak electricity demand in countries where the climate is hot [20]. In Brazil, buildings consume 50% of the electricity used in the country [104].

In recent years, there has been growing interest in sustainable building envelopes in order to reduce the impact of building development on the environment [52]. Interest in the use of sustainability systems is therefore widespread. The building envelope directly influences the annual energy consumption and, consequently, the operating costs for heating, cooling and humidity control of internal spaces [62]. Thus, these systems cover energy consumption factors, life cycle analysis and overall building performance [57].

The building envelope separates the internal space from the external environment, changing the amount of heat flow through itself [102]. In the case of the ventilated facade system with open joints, solar radiation on the outer cladding heats it up and activates convection inside the air chamber, generating ventilation as an upward air current that enters and leaves the cavity through the open joints. When this current leaves the chamber through the upper openings, it removes thermal energy. In this way, the temperature of the masonry wall and the flow of heat into the building are reduced, reducing the energy needed for air conditioning [36]. Thus, the envelope is the basic determining factor of the internal climate and the demand for supplementary mechanical energy [102].

When it comes to thermal comfort inside buildings, heating systems must provide or collect and store solar heat and retain heat inside the building [62]. Conversely, cooling systems must provide cool air or protect the building from direct solar radiation and improve air ventilation [20]. Thus, they can help to reduce energy requirements for heating, ventilation and cooling, while maintaining adequate indoor temperature and humidity comfort [36].

The envelope has the greatest impact on the overall energy consumption of the building [2,102]. Advanced facades, involving double facade technologies, have attracted increasing attention due to their thermal insulation performance [105].

There are various types of envelopes designed to improve the thermal and energy performance of buildings [58]. Exterior building elements, such as facades, can function as passive solar energy systems and act as barriers between external and internal conditions.

With the widespread development of intelligent facade design, it is possible to state that the integration of double-sided facades, double-glazed facades and ventilated facades, as well as kinetic facades (architectural facades that change dynamically, i.e. facades with moving surfaces [106] and solar facades) can make a significant contribution to reducing energy consumption, the building's energy and environmental performance, enriching the user's visual and thermal comfort and ultimately reducing environmental risks [57,58].

The building envelope and the period of operation of the heating system are important parameters that affect the total heating energy consumption in the building [102]. Room heating or cooling systems are related to the climatic condition of the location [20]. The thermal performance of VFS depends on the composition and thermal performance of the layers, the insulation status of the interior facade, the height and width of the air gap, the type of ventilation, sun exposure and wind conditions [60,107]. However, thermal comfort conditions do not only depend on external environmental factors, but also on architectural parameters and guidelines and design elements, such as the position and orientation of the building, facade materials, shading devices, type and location of windows and roof shape [57].

However, it is important to state that the internal comfort of users must be sufficient without there being any mechanical heating in the building, for the system to be considered a passive heating system. Climatic comfort conditions cannot be met by the passive heating system alone at any given time of the year. If a supplementary heating system is required for the building, the amount of energy that will be used in the system is a function of the thermal performance of the passive heating system [102].

VFS is efficient in summer as well as in winter [5,46,61,62]. VFS is a solution used to reduce energy needs in summer, as the greatest cost (energy) benefits are found in hot regions [5,41,63]. In summer, the thermal gradient between the upper and lower openings, driven by buoyancy and wind forces, activates air flow. This allows the heated air in the ventilation chamber to be expelled through the outlet opening, reducing heat transfer to the interior [46]. Energy savings increase with the intensity of solar radiation [41,66]. The higher the solar radiation, the more efficient ventilated facades become in terms of energy savings that can achieves more than 40% in summer [66].

Currently, in southern European locations, the main interest in VFS lies in its ability to reduce cooling thermal loads [2]. In winter, the ventilation gap of the VFS acts as a thermal buffer that accumulates heat and dampens the temperature difference between inside and outside, reducing transmission losses [63]. The VFS also has a positive effect on the thermal resistance of the wall [63,108].

When comparing traditional systems with VFS, the literature recognises the energy savings associated with VFS. However, the number of studies pertaining to the impact of VFS during winter is low [2], as shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Thermal performance of the VFS.

Work  Results and conclusions 
Gratia and de Herde [43] simulated natural ventilation in double-skin facades using TAS software, a CADD system in a medium-sized office building under various sunny conditions, taking into account the impact of the orientation of the double-skin, the impact of the wind orientation and the degree of wind protection.  The effectiveness of a double-skin cannot be drawn on the basis of a thermal study alone. Climate data and location also influenced the results.If the VFS was orientated to the south and not ventilated, the temperature would reach:• 47°C with no shading devices;• 52°C with shading devices.When the sun is shining, it is very important to ensure effective ventilation, as the decisive factors are the orientation of the double skin and the heat released as a result of absorption by the shading areas. The stack effect and the wind pressure in the building are a function of the direction of the air flow and the air exchange rate in the area. 
Stazi et al. [39] evaluated the actual thermal performance of a ventilated facade using external clay cladding in a temperate Mediterranean climate  On sunny days, external surface temperatures, temperatures in the air cavity and air velocity in the air chamber are higher for the 12m wall. At night, lower temperatures are found for the various layers of the wall.Air velocity and air flow values increase considerably when the ventilation chimney is doubled.Walls facing east and west reach higher temperatures due to solar radiation in the early and late hours of the day, as it hits the wall at a low angle.VFS with solid opaque external cladding perform well in a Mediterranean climate.A larger ventilation channel and facing south should be chosen, as it performs better in terms of air velocity and flow values. 
Stazi et al. [40] investigated the thermo-physical performance of VFS, checking the effects of the sunlight exposure parameter  There is a strong relationship between the internal–external air temperature difference and air flow; the wind pressure influences the air flow of the lower walls, but not affect the performance of the upper walls.The lower walls are more influenced by the presence of wind and only in the case of high-speed winds do they outperform the upper walls.The maximum values, recorded at different times of the day, ranged from 50 to 56°C.For the internal surface temperatures, in all three studied cases the values were between 25 and 28°C.The effect of exposure to sunlight influences the performance of the ventilated facade: greater thermal performance for the east-facing wall in the morning and greater for the south- and west-facing walls during the rest of the day, with a benefit in the night-time cooling effect for the west-facing wall.The type of external cladding and the characteristics of the materials that are placed next to the channel influence the onset time of the stack effect. 
Santa Cruz Astorqui and Porras-Amores [112] studied the feasibility of adding a second air chamber parallel to the existing one  The architectural design of conventional building envelope systems tends to offer an improvement in the energy and comfort performance of the building.The proposed system allows for an increase in efficiency of 38% in the summer period and 333% in the winter period, compared to the VFS with a closed joint air chamber.A vertical thermal gradient (from the bottom to the top of the facade) of ≈14°C in the conventional VFS and only ≈5°C in the proposed ventilated facade system, a reduction of 65%.In terms of cost, the increase was estimated at around 43€/m2 of facade for a 12m high building, which represents an increase of 24.8% on the cost of the conventional system. 
Fantucci et al. [19] evaluated the thermal performance of a newly developed VFS based on hollow clay coating technology  Facade configuration and design features significantly affect the ability of opaque ventilated facades to minimise solar heat loads on the wall (between ∼30 and 70%) compared to an unventilated facade.The colour of the external surface is the characteristic that most affects energy performance in summer: light bright colours are preferable compared to dark colours.The reduction in daily heat loads compared to a reference unventilated brick facade was 80 and 31% respectively for the light and dark facade.The height of the facade has a significant impact on the air speed, which increases from 0.40 to 0.68m/s, going from 237 to 456cm of facade height, with an increase of almost 70%. However, the impact on reducing the daily thermal load (DTL) is limited, at around 2.5%.The outside air temperature is the climatic parameter that strongly affects summer energy performance. 
Gagliano and Aneli [97] compared the thermal behaviour of a conventional ventilated facade and an opaque ventilated facade.  The thermal behaviour of both the conventional unventilated facade and the opaque ventilated facade strongly depends on their exposure and wind state.During the day, the external surface temperatures of the opaque ventilated facade are up to 20°C lower than the conventional unventilated facade.At night, the opaque ventilated facade keeps surface temperatures higher on the internal wall compared to the conventional unventilated facade, thus reducing the risk of condensation.In winter, the opaque ventilated facade guarantees energy savings of 20% for the east and west facades in windy conditions and 50% for the south facade in calm wind conditions. In summer, the opaque ventilated facade guarantees almost constant energy savings, ranging from 40 to 50% depending on the orientation of the facade and the wind conditions. 
Pujadas-Gispert et al. [61] reported on the design, construction and thermal performance evaluation of a ventilated facade built according to the principles of a circular economy, using bio-based materials  The energy consumption to control the indoor ambient temperature was reduced; therefore, the facade obtained from renewable and recyclable resources contributed to the sustainability of the flat.The airflow (including wind), shading and insulation provided by the layers of the ventilated facade contributed to heat dissipation during the day.The ventilated facade preserved the internal temperature of the flat during the night and mitigated the effect of external temperatures inside the flat. 
Stazi et al. [46] investigated how different materials and thermal masses can impact on the performance of ventilated facades with narrow cavities, measuring the variation in terms of heat flow and ventilation efficiency  A solid external cladding using hollow bricks more effectively mitigated the average surface temperatures, both external and internal, with values of −2 and −1°C in summer and −3 and −0.5°C in winter, when compared to the lightweight solution with a plastered OSB panel.The insertion of a thermal mass in the outer layer increased the air velocity in the chamber, increasing the chimney effect. 
De Masi et al. [63] analysed the thermo-hygrometric behaviour in winter in order to account for heat loss and control humidity in an open-joint ventilated facade designed to be environmentally sustainable  A solar radiation incident on the wall between 700 and 800W/m2 and a outside temperature during the sunny period between 12 and 20°C lead to a maximum increase in air temperature throughout the cavity.For the designed configuration, the air temperature increased by 5.0°C/m after 1h of maximum incident solar radiation.In winter, in humid and rainy weather, the predominant effect is insulation and ventilation does not increase heat loss. 
Pizzatto et al. [113] developed a porous ceramic tile using waste glass and lime slurry for use on a ventilated facade  The use of porous ceramic slabs in the system developed reduced the temperature inside the structure by 7.5% compared to the test with a commercial slab.The use of porous ceramic slabs can provide greater thermal insulation inside the building from the outside.The porous ceramic tiles obtained are potential candidates to work as thermal insulators with properties suitable for application in ventilated facades. 
Pizzatto et al. [114], using the highest performance specimens obtained by Pizzatto et al. [115], studied the thermal behaviour of ventilated facade in comparison with a commercial porcelain tile as a reference material  The VFS made up of the studied porous ceramic tiles produced a greater reduction in temperature between the outside environment and the inside of a representative building box (ΔT) of 65.7°C, when compared to the VFS made up of commercial porcelain tiles (ΔT=56.0°C) and when simulated with a traditional facade (ΔT=49.1°C).The temperature inside the box using the porous VFS decreased more than 16°C in comparison with the conventional VFS and almost 10°C in relation to the commercial VFS. 
Yu et al. presented a review on the development of facade-based building integrated photovoltaic-thermal (BIPVT) and focused on solar system designs integrated with building facades and their influence on electricity generation, thermal performance of photovoltaic cells and energy consumption of buildings for space heating and cooling  The advantages and disadvantages of various projects and future research directions were described and discussed.The results of the review are useful for researchers and engineers to select appropriate BIPVT projects for the application of renewable energy in buildings. 
Soudian and Berardi [116] designed a climate-responsive facade system that was evaluated through experimental tests  A significant impact of solar radiation was obtained, which required a constant time adjustment in the operation of the facade fans.A facade can pre-condition fresh air, acting as a decentralised ventilation module, can achieve a high heat recovery efficiency of 81%. 
Picallo-Perez and Sala-Lizarraga [117] analysed ventilated facades using the first and second laws of thermodynamics  The internal energy variation of the facade is broken down according to its layers.In terms of energy, the sandwich insulation layer has the greatest influence (99.45% of the total variation), but in terms of exergy, on the other hand, the metal sheet affects the majority (83.66%).It is clear that the behaviour of the ventilated facade is 44% better in a exergy point of view.The metal sheet affects this behaviour the most (83.66%). 
Mangkuto et al. [118] sought to determine the ideal orientation for building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) on tropical building facades  The highest annual energy yield was in the northern orientation, providing 179–186kWh (95% prediction interval) per year, followed by the west (159–163kWh), south (156–161kWh) and east (146–164kWh).The south orientation was considered optimal for placing the BIPV panel on the facade of the prototype on site. 
Nagdeve et al. [119] carried out a real-time study to evaluate the effect of indirect green facade systems on the glazed facade to assess thermal comfort in the composite climate of India  Temperatures on the south-west-facing green facades were up to 8.1°C lower than the respective temperatures on the bare facade.In summer, night-time temperatures for the vegetated facade were up to 5.1°C higher than for the base facade.No significant insulating effect was observed in the cold season.The greatest reduction was observed between 2 and 6 pm, implying a relationship with the high solar radiation during these time periods in the south-west orientation.As a result of lower airgap and external surface temperatures, the internal surface temperature was also lower by up to 8.6°C; however, there is no significant reduction in the temperature of the interior space compared to the bare facade situation.Although the green facade had the function of lowering the building's temperatures, it also increased the relative humidity, making for an uncomfortable interior.Installing a green facade with more than 150mm of distance between the vegetation system and the facade surface is ideal in New Delhi's composite climate. 
Reffat and Ezzat [120] investigated the impacts of design configurations, including positions, dimensions, orientations, PV (photovoltaic) areas and movement options in order to track the sun on increasing the amount of renewable energy generated  The use of dual-axis mobile PV achieved high amounts of renewable energy generated, of 53, 39 and 33% compared to fixed PV at the optimum tilt angle and connected to the north, south and east and west facades, respectively.The highest amount of renewable energy generated is 417.7kWh/m2 and achieved using horizontal axis tracking PV on solid surfaces and windows on the east facade.Other tested scenarios: 405kWh/m2 using horizontal axis tracking PV on solid surfaces or windows on the east facade, 400kWh/m2 using horizontal axis tracking PV on solid surfaces and windows on the south facade and 388kWh/m2 using horizontal axis tracking PV on solid walls on the east and south facades. 
Sigi Kumar et al. [121] presented a comparison of the performance of coconut shell insulation and green facade in order to mitigate the addition of ambient heat in hot and humid climates prevalent on the south coast of India  The dry coconut mat had a heat mitigation potential of around 41.5%, while the wet coconut mat had 36.3%. It was only 6.2% for the green facade due to its inefficiency in rejecting heat during the non-sunny period.The heat mitigation potential of the green facade can be increased to 40.3% when a coconut fibre mat is added.It was also found that the coconut mat can reduce heat addition to the wall and reject heat to the environment due to its porous nature (24.5%). 
Zhangabay et al. [122] proposed new energy-saving facade constructions with closed horizontal openings by using the ANSYS environment and the finite element method  A decrease in the volume of the insulating material by 31.3% resulted in a reduction in the thermal resistance value for all external temperature values, i.e., at the absolute minimum by 26.3%, at the absolute maximum temperature by 26.4% and at the average temperature in April (the first month after the end of the heating period) by 26.5%.A similar decrease was also observed when comparing facade structures with heat-reflecting screens: a 24.8% reduction in absolute minimum temperature, a 24.8% reduction in absolute maximum temperature and a 24.1% reduction in average temperature in the first month after the end of the heating period (April).The results of the research can be used in the design and construction of buildings to reduce consumption and save energy. 
Catto Lucchino and Goia [123] proposed a multi-domain model-based control (MBC) algorithm for an adaptive facade concept based on a flexible double skin facade (DSF)  The energy and environmental performance were within the selected comfort criteria for all domains for >80% of occupied time, while simultaneously obtaining an energy reduction of up to 70% compared to more traditional approaches.The new system showed a potential of 11% reduction in primary energy consumption compared to a traditional renovation, in which the facade was insulated, the windows were replaced and a balanced ventilation system was installed.The concept has the potential to become an alternative to traditional school renovation if the facade faces south. 
Schaffer et al. [124] investigated the performance of I-DIFFER under different boundary conditions using BPS  I-DIFFER can compete with the traditional renovation approach for all the orientations investigated, with the exception of north, and leads to superior results for south orientations.For the classroom facade to be favourable, a facade must have high thermal mass with low reflectance.For the east, however, I-DIFFER was found to have a higher PE demand for higher occupant densities (25 occupants) than the worst traditional refurbishment.I-DIFFER can be confirmed as a competitive alternative to a traditional renovation and contributes to improving not only energy efficiency, but also the indoor environmental quality (IEQ) of schools. 
Soutullo et al. [111] compared a conventional building with a bioclimatic building, built in the 1960s and 2008, respectively  The bioclimatic building recorded lower amplitudes for internal temperatures than the conventional building.The behaviour of the bioclimatic building was close to the summer thermal comfort range and the temperature variation of the bioclimatic offices was more stable compared to the conventional ones.In the summer, there was a cooling of 1.5°C for conventional offices, while in the bioclimatic building the reduction was 1.8°C. In winter, the reduction was 1.4°C for conventional offices and almost zero in the bioclimatic building.The overall primary energy consumption of the conventional building was 23.8kWh/m2 from heating systems, 25.1kWh/m2 from cooling systems and 75.7kWh/m2 from lighting systems. For the bioclimatic building, the overall primary energy consumption was 5.6kWh/m2 from heating systems, 11.9kWh/m2 from cooling systems and 63.3kWh/m2 from lighting systems. Therefore, overall primary energy consumption was reduced from 124.6kWh/m2 in a conventional building to 80.8kWh/m2 in a bioclimatic building. 
Colinart et al. [99] monitored, for two years, a building built in 1959 renovated (in 2015) with prefabricated ventilated facade elements  The average internal surface temperature was 17.5°C, the external surface temperature recorded an average value of 8.1°C and the average heat flux density was −1.21W/m2.There were no significant damp-related pathologies in the retrofitted building envelope.The analysis revealed that the moisture content should not vary significantly and so the risk of mould growth should be very limited.Hygrothermal comfort was achieved most of the time during classes and the CO2 concentration exceeded the critical limits every day. 
Ascione et al. [15] studied the envelope of several buildings, as it is the main subsystem through which energy losses occur between the interior and exterior environments  One of the most important challenges was the implementation of eco-sustainable solutions, such as the improvement and innovation of a high-efficiency transparent photovoltaic system.All the advantages obtained and discussed in this review suggest that these technologies, which are currently not very widespread in the construction market, could become a future opportunity to investigate. 
Ghaffarianhoseini [57] analysed the application of the BIM methodology, with an emphasis on quantitative analysis and investigation of the thermal performance of buildings containing VFS  BIM-based simulations of the building envelope can help predict the energy consumption of buildings, resulting in corresponding energy savings.Various energy modelling and simulation software have been developed for analysing building energy performance and, in particular, the effects of facades, including ASHRAE 90, DOE-2, MIT Design Advisor, Energy Plus, among others. 
Azkorra-Larrinaga et al. [98] studied a stochastic differential equation model to be used to evaluate the cooling requirements of an open ventilated facade. An analysis was carried out to assess how different characteristics of the main facade affect performance, such as solar absorption coefficient, thermal resistance and convection coefficient.  The open ventilated facade minimized solar heat loads by 67% compared to non-passive bare wall facades, which were used as a reference.For the effective absorptivity of the solutions analysed (0.70 for the bare facade and 0.36 for the ventilated facade), the passive cooling strategies can be included for ventilated facades.In the case of the ventilated facade, the reduction is 48% compared to the reference situation.The positive energy-saving effect of the ventilated facade were 6.22W/(m2K) for the bare facade and 16.32W/(m2K) for the open ventilated facade.It could be concluded that the open ventilated facade system studied has a favourable thermal performance in the hot season, as it allows for a reduction in the cooling needs of buildings. 

Thus, according to the literature, thermal performance of VFS is a biological, environmental, and economic issue, which depends on different aspects, such as the composition and thermal performance of the layers, the insulation status of the interior facade, the height and width of the air gap, the type of ventilation, sun exposure and wind conditions, among others. Due to the complexity of the interaction among these factors, there is no consensus on the conditions that best describe the thermal behaviour of a VFS.

Solar systems on facades

Climate change is a current phenomenon and has a direct impact on people's daily lives [144]. Buildings account for a third of global energy consumption and a quarter of CO2 emissions worldwide and are seen as contributors to climate change [145]. From this perspective, new facade systems such as adsorption cooling facades (ACFS) play an important role in reducing CO2 emissions and contributing to the energy efficiency of buildings [146].

Li et al. [146] studied an adsorption-based solar facade cooling system (ACFS, adsorption cooling facade system) that was created at the University of Stuttgart. This system combines adsorption cooling systems with the architecture of high-rise building facades. The system uses the solar energy captured by the facade to feed the adsorption process, providing efficient and sustainable cooling to the building's internal environments. The aim of the work is to identify the appropriate adsorbent for use in ACFS systems. The authors carried out a classification using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method among 293 adsorbents, evaluating a number of criteria, including: non-toxicity and being environmentally friendly, low cost, long useful life and good cycle stability, low regeneration temperature and high adsorption capacity and low adsorption enthalpy. After screening, the work obtained 10 promising adsorbents. The performance of these 10 adsorbents was analysed using numerical simulation models and sensitivity analysis of the DA equation parameters. Finally, the study concludes that materials such as silica gel Type A++, Type 2560, Siogel and molecular sieve AQSOA-FAM-Z02 have lower maximum adsorbent temperatures of 1.5–9.3°C and increase solar cooling efficiency (SCE) by 25–27% compared to the reference adsorbent Zeolite 13X. However, the authors point out that relevant improvements in performance require integrated research, taking into account the choice of material, system design and operating conditions, as well as the choice of adsorbent.

The study of Barone et al. [147] consisted of exploring the use of DSF with integrated active solar systems in Mediterranean countries, with the aim of finding a viable and suitable solution for the energy-efficient renovation of the building stock and the analysis extends to the influence of the separation distance between the building facade and the DSF structure. The study was carried out by means of parametric analysis, using the TRNSYS and MatLab software tools, to comprehensively explore the potential of DSFs with integrated active solar systems. Double-skin facades (DSFs) with integrated PVs is a building envelope system with two layers of materials separated by an air gap. The outer layer is incorporated with solar panels. The aim is to harness solar energy for electricity generation, and to provide additional thermal insulation and environmental control benefits. The analysis was based on a three-storey building positioned with its long side facing east to west. The overall dimensions of the building are 30m long, 14m wide and 18m high. The simulations were tested using two different quantities of photovoltaic panels, 75 and 150 photovoltaic panels, and eleven different DSF gap depth dimensions were tested, ranging from 0.5 to 10.0m, since the main objective was to evaluate the potential of different gap sizes as architectural solutions. According to the results, it can be concluded that the use of DSFs in buildings saves energy without the need to add insulation to the building, and can therefore be sustainable. The results show that a DSF with a depth of less than 7.0m produces a reduction in heating demands ranging from −5.49 to −0.82%. However, the study emphasizes that when it comes to cooling loads, the use of DSFs with a depth greater than 6.0m presents significantly greater advantages, becoming a potential for energy-efficient cooling solutions. The results also show that the depth of the air cavity inside the DSF influences the electrical performance of the integrated photovoltaic panels. Increased depth is correlated with improved efficiency of the photovoltaic panel, resulting in higher electricity production. The study highlights that the feasibility of building such cavities depends on architectural designs and engineering solutions and that these considerations are important for optimizing energy performance and reducing carbon emissions in existing buildings.

Barone et al. [148] pointed out that in recent decades, there has been a significant increase in scientific literature on the integration of renewable energy sources in various economic sectors. Considering this, the use of renewable energy sources (RES) in the construction sector has become important. The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution to the heating and cooling energy needs of three facade systems (conventional double facade system (DF), building-integrated photovoltaic double facade system (BIPV DF) and building-integrated photovoltaic/thermal double facade system (BIPV/T DF)) in a one-bedroom studio housing module. The commercial software DesignBuilder was used to model the energy systems. Dynamic simulations were carried out using the EnergyPlus building energy simulation software for a representative climate zone in the south-eastern Mediterranean. For the analysis of the three systems, they were employed and applied to a sample thermal zone, and the cavity space framed by the double facade was considered as a balcony space. A parametric analysis was carried out. Six different cavity depths were tested, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25 and 1.50m. The depth of the cavity was also examined as to the extent to which it could be used as a semi-open balcony space, an extension of the living space. The space is characterized as being a living space of the studio apartment (zone 1), and the thermal zone examined in zone 2 is the external balcony space, also known as the cavity space between the double facade system and the glass doors of the studio. The space comprises a layout with dimensions of 6.50m×4.25m, 3.00m high and an area of 27.6m2. The results showed that as the depth of the cavity increased, so did the thermal heating loads. However, in relation to the cooling thermal loads, as the depth of the cavity increased, the cooling thermal loads decreased. The conclusion reached is that the shading effect influenced the results. As the depth of the cavity increases, the shading effect also increases, which means that during the winter period not enough solar radiation enters the internal spaces. It is therefore possible to state that greater thermal loads in the form of heating must be supplied to the module. In summer, there is less solar gain due to the shading effect, so cooling loads decrease and less thermal load must be extracted from the module. A parametric analysis was also carried out and the exact size of the cavity was calculated. A cavity depth of 1.00m was defined, since at this depth the thermal loads are not as high as at a greater depth, and it can also be used as a balcony space, since 0.25–0.75m would not be architecturally suitable. In the conventional DF system, the results indicate that for the cavity space to have the minimum primary energy requirements and be used as a balcony space, the cavity depth should be set at 1.00m. In the case of the BIPV DF and for the BIPV/T DF, the ideal cavity depth was calculated to be 0.97m and could be used as a balcony space as well. The results showed that the energy performance was −51.03kWh/m2 year for the BIPV DF system and −77.93kWh/m2 year for the BIPV/T DF system. The results showed that by adding a conventional DF system it is not possible to reduce energy needs. However, with the implementation of a BIPV system and a BIPV/T DF system, it is possible to reduce energy needs.

Miscellaneous

The use of VFS is a useful application in many different sectors.

VFS is a perfect solution for residential buildings, not only for new buildings, but also for retrofitting [2], as in the case of restoration and renovation of old buildings [26]. Extending the useful life of the building can reduce waste generation and the depletion of natural resources. The reasons for building demolition are related to the lack of adequacy of the construction to current needs and the lack of maintenance of various non-structural components. Throughout the world, a large part of the existing building stock is inefficient and inadequate from a thermal and energy point of view, as well as with regard to current needs for thermal, hygrometric, visual and acoustic comfort, healthiness and accessibility [15]. In order to increase the useful life of the building, taking into account future occupation, technology and climatic conditions, it is important to concentrate the building elements with the shortest useful life, i.e., facade systems separated from the central structure of the building, for example.

In this way, it helps with technical upgrades with minimal disruption to the building and increases the chances of building refurbishment compared to building demolition [109].

The civil construction industry is currently facing a number of challenges, including poor energy performance in existing buildings [107]. Building retrofitting has been widely investigated in recent years due to its crucial role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption [110]. This is mainly because in Europe, the continent where VFS became widespread, the building stock prior to the 1970s was characterised by buildings with poor or non-existent insulation in walls and/or roofs; single glazing was used, which increases the overall heat transfer coefficient of the building components. These buildings have no energy performance criteria or sustainable construction policies. Many of these buildings still have central heating systems installed with low-efficiency fossil fuel boilers [111].

Monitoring activities play an important role; with this, it is possible to predict the effect of a variety of types of retrofitting actions that respect the strict performance criteria established by the new energy regulations and to compare the different conformations of the outer envelope layer in order to be used in the design of new buildings [65].

Retrofitting seeks solutions based on transforming the concept of the enveloping layer by implementing responsive building components, i.e., creating technologies capable of exploiting natural resources to convert energy and protect the internal environment. Taking technological and architectural experimentation into account, the building envelope has evolved from an element characterised only as a protective barrier to a complex system of filters, capable of causing interactions between the internal and external environments [15].

In line with the significant improvement in energy performance in old buildings, the application of VFS has become the subject of studies and has proved to be advantageous.

The rapid advance of building design, construction and maintenance technologies has the potential to improve the performance of the building facades that define the landscape of modern cities. All the developments of the contemporary era and occupants’ desire for high levels of comfort are becoming a major challenge for architects and engineers at the time of design and execution. The advancement of the building information modelling (BIM) methodology makes it possible to include building facade components with optimised energy performance. The aim is to promote innovative construction technologies that act to optimise the energy performance of the building, as well as improving interior conditions while maintaining the aesthetic dimension [67].

As computer resources are currently being used in the energy simulation process, the BIM – building information modelling – methodology has been used in the energy simulation process in order to assess the cost-benefit of implementing VFS.

According to Ryu and Park [125], the traditional energy simulation method has disadvantages because it takes time and effort to put the architectural information into the energy simulation software. This method features entering architectural information using numerical data or making a two-dimensional model using a user interface integrated into simulation software. BIM is a rising technology in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry and has been applied to various research topics, involving various aspects such as project planning, structural design, facilities management, among other stages of construction [126]. The introduction of BIM has made it possible to obtain a three-dimensional model and, in this way, the actual time needed to model architectural geometries has been reduced [125]. BIM is contributing to the growing demand for energy efficiency and the AEC industry is demanding rapid energy modernisation of the existing building stock [126].

BIM incorporates the functions needed to model the life cycle of a building [127]; it is the development and use of a software data model used to document the design of a building and also simulate its construction and operation [125], providing the basis for new construction capabilities, design, modifications and relationships of the team involved in the development [127]. One of the areas that makes use of this BIM information is analysing building performance [125]. Various building performance simulation software programmes integrate BIM data, such as Green Building Studio, Ecotect, Vasari Project, VE, among others. This integration makes them excellent decision-making tools for designing a high-energy building [125].

The VFS has become the focus of research in different areas of research and activity.

Sarmadi and Mahdavinejad [128] investigated facade design patterns with satisfactory performance in order to promote daylight glare control, the possibility of natural ventilation and control of facade energy transfer. The proposal is to use glass in part of the facade to facilitate visibility and the possibility of natural ventilation. Furthermore, in the studies in which microalgae were used as a daylight glare controller, they were limited. Therefore, we sought to measure the ideal position and concentration of this material as an architectural element from the point of view of optimal visibility, sufficient natural light in the space and glare control in large offices. To this end, the research presents a combined curtain facade model made up of algae panels and electrochromic glasses elements suitable for expansive surface facades and a deep, large-scale plan with a mezzanine. Three categories of curtain wall were simulated and analysed: all-algae, all-glass, and combined glass and microalgae. The results showed that, commonly, the characteristics for designing curtain wall facades in large open-plan office buildings; the best performance is for the combined facade with top panels with a concentration of 50–60%, which allow enough natural light to pass through.

Prosperi et al. [129] investigated the damage response of unreinforced masonry (URM) facades on foundations subjected to ground settlement using numerical models. The models depicted the non-linear constitutive behaviour of both masonry, scattered cracking, soil-foundation interaction, and non-linear interface elements. The effect of different building characteristics such as masonry material, length to height ratio (L/H) geometry, wall thickness, number and size of openings and different types of strip foundations (reinforced and unreinforced concrete) was examined. Eight settlement methods were applied to the models, including symmetrical and asymmetrical profiles, while angular distortion was used to measure their intensity. The results showed that as damage increased, the facade tended to be more flexible, accommodating the imposed settlement deformations better, than facades on reinforced concrete strip foundations; on average, they showed lower levels of damage compared to masonry facades, than facades with L/H less than or equal to 1. They showed cracks of, on average, a maximum of 1mm, with no subsequent progression of damage, even for high values of applied angular distortion (such as 0.1 or 1/10) and that, on the contrary, some of the facades with L/H greater than 1 showed cracks equal to or greater than 5mm for applied angular distortion of 0.35‰ (or 1/2833).

Zhao et al. [130] proposed the concept of equivalent ambient temperature to quantify the long-wave radiation emitted by other buildings and surrounding trees. The energy balance of the building facade affects the accuracy of the building's energy forecast. A detailed radiation transfer model was developed in order to assess the energy balance of longwave radiation from building facades. In addition, the analysis of meteorological parameters revealed that air temperature and solar radiation are important parameters that determine the environment's ability to emit longwave radiation. The accuracy of the longwave radiation calculation was 71.4% higher in the simplified SVF model than in the original model. These findings have implications for building energy forecasting and energy efficiency projects, as they provide a more accurate method for calculating the longwave radiation energy balance of building facades. Such analyses are important for assessing the adverse effects of excessive heat radiation on the built environment due to increased ambient temperatures and human comfort.

Kahramanoğlu and Çakici Alp [131] presented the design of a responsive facade model based on origami principles, which aim to increase visual comfort for building occupants. The simulations were carried out in Istanbul, which has a Mediterranean climate, and compared to a base scenario without a facade module. The model features kinetic elements that reduce solar heat gain while maintaining visual comfort. In this way, the project considered not only the impact of the sun on the facade, but also the position of the occupants, which can change over time. The simulation results for the base case and the proposed origami-based module were evaluated separately for each user at the specified dates and times. The values indicated that the amount of daylight entering the reference room, exceeding the required levels, has decreased. Compared to the base case, the average value of daylight autonomy measures increased from 51.7 to 69.7% in the proposed origami-based responsive facade module, while the amount of useful daylight illuminance increased from 61.0 to 80.8%. Satisfactory results for improving daylight performance on the facade were obtained, since the aim was to obtain the best utilisation of daylight without impairing visibility.

Kizilörenli and Maden [132] have developed alternative responsive facade systems based on semi-regular, triangular and hexagonal mosaics. Responsive facades can reduce a building's energy consumption and control daylight and natural ventilation in order to improve user comfort. The aim was to increase user comfort by keeping the annual sunlight exposure value below 10% and the useful daylight luminosity at an optimum level. Based on the data, it was observed that the proposed facade systems can provide the desired level of natural light and the preferred visual comfort in different configurations with the preferred mosaic patterns. Even if the number of panels varies, the proposed systems have a positive effect on controlling daylight and the preferred conditions for users and the amount of daylight in the interior space was balanced in all cases, despite the type of pattern changed.

Tao et al. [133] investigated forced convection heat transfer on the facade of a single multi-storey building with balconies using steady-state 3D RANS CFD simulations. The balconies can alter the flow pattern near the facade of the building, affecting the convective heat transfer coefficient of the facades. The model is validated by a reduced-scale wind tunnel experiment and used to conduct simulations with high-resolution grids. The results showed that, with the presence of balconies, the average convective heat transfer coefficient (CHTC) of the surface was reduced by around 17.5% on the windward facade, while on the leeward facade it was reduced by 35.2%. When the balcony height was varied from 0.5 to 1.5m, the average surface CHTC decreased by up to 39, 49 and 50% on the leeward facade and the internal surfaces of the windward and leeward balconies, respectively. However, balcony depth and length have relatively non-significant effects on the average surface CHTC of building facades and balcony surfaces. The results of this study would facilitate the calculation of cooling and heating loads for buildings with balconies. The difference in the average CHTC obtained from the correlations and simulations was less than 6%.

Tabadkani et al. [134] combined a simulation-based methodology with fuzzy logic and a genetic algorithm in order to personalise facade modules based on occupants’ visual discomfort conditions. The results confirmed that increasing freedom of control through personalisation, considering glare, daylight and vision as criteria, can satisfy occupants from 83 to 100%. In addition, the proposed facade personalisation structure can improve visual comfort compared to two typical automated venetian blind controls, over four representative weeks, and revealed that a multi-objective control mechanism was needed as a response to the multidimensional and conflicting desires of users in a shared space. The personalised control satisfied both users with closely differing preferences over 92% of the time, which suggested a valuable approach for future studies. The results raised the awareness of facade designers and engineers, building facility managers and project stakeholders with useful information to successfully extend the current study application to personalised control systems.

Luna-Navarro et al. [135] evaluated dynamic automated facades and manually operated facades to try to answer whether dynamic automated facades with user override (semi-automated) can outperform manually operated facades in terms of multi-domain occupant satisfaction. The work included monitoring the quality of the indoor environment, occupant satisfaction, interaction and discomfort in a real office space in two different scenarios: one, aimed at maximising access to natural light and outdoor views while mitigating glare, in which the facade blinds were controlled automatically, and another in which the facade blinds were controlled manually by the occupants. The results showed that when the facade was controlled by a semi-automated strategy, occupant satisfaction was higher, especially in the thermal environment, despite occupants reporting a greater number of discomfort events due to the lack of natural light and access to external views. The presented results listed some limitations that condition its applicability, such as some differences in the external climatic conditions between the scenarios assessed and a small number of volunteers (11 people). However, to increase occupant acceptance, better glare prediction is needed to avoid visual discomfort and maximise daylight and vision.

Falcão Socoloski et al. [136] evaluated the influence of different cardinal directions considering temperature and rain humidity for the facades of buildings made of solid ceramic bricks or 6-hole blocks covered with cement mortar, located in the city of Santa Maria, Brazil. The climatic agents were analysed using hygrothermal simulations carried out with WUFI® Pro 6.5 software and, for each solar orientation, the TII (thermal intensity index) and RIF (rain impact factor) were determined, taking into account the intensity of humidity due to precipitation. Based on the results, it could be concluded that the TII and RIF for the external mortar cladding indicated that the substrate (solid ceramic brick or 6-hole block) did not significantly influence the results. This lack of influence of the substrate on the temperature and humidity of the external layer (external mortar) can be positive for carrying out inspections and surveys on facades and subsequently drawing up damage maps, especially when there is not enough information on the materials used in the construction or when it is not possible to take samples and perform destructive tests. Solar orientation was identified as significant in the TII and RIF results. The results indicated that the composition of the wall substrate, with solid ceramic bricks or 6-hole blocks, had no impact of the temperature and humidity of the rain on the external coating of the facade mortars. The results were satisfactory, allowing us to understand the hygrothermal behaviour of vertical sealing systems. However, the results differed according to the cardinal orientations considered.

Zagubień and Wolniewicz [137] presented the capabilities and application ranges of a newly designed portable device (a test bench) for measuring sound waves reflected from the facade of a building. The test bench was used in measurements to determine the validity of the −3 and −5.7dB correction recommended by the ISO 1996-2 standard, depending on the location of the microphone on the building facade. In many countries, the ISO 1996-2 standard is a guideline on how to measure and evaluate the acoustic environment. The test bench developed can be used to monitor environmental noise, as well as to validate the software used to develop noise maps. Depending on the width of the passageways. The results obtained in the tests carried out confirmed the previous findings of many researchers. The actual differences between the sound levels measured on the facade of the building were lower than those proposed in the ISO 1996-2 standard. At no point did the measurement results come close to the correction of −3dB for the distance of 1m from the building facade and −5.7dB for the location of the microphone on the building facade. The authors were aware that locating the microphone at a distance of 3.0m from the building facade does not offer free sound field conditions.

In the literature, it is possible to find some research attributing wind as the main theme in facade studies.

Król et al. [138] presented experimental measurements of air flow through different types of facade openings. A mock-up of a facade with replaceable openings was built. A set of anemometers placed behind each opening recorded the air velocity distribution for three incident wind speeds. The results confirmed that the amount of air at the entrance strongly depends on the type of opening, the wind speed and direction and, for adjustable windows, the position of the window frame. In addition, the amount of air flowing into the building will be affected by the angle at which the wind enters the facade of the building.

Najafi Ziarani et al. [139] presented a detailed analysis of unilateral wind-dominant natural ventilation using a validated LES numerical model. The focus of the investigations centred around the presence of parallel flow close to the building facade and the effect this has on the flow structure in the opening, as well as on the internal secondary flow. The general characteristics of the local air flow at the opening and inside the room were strongly associated with the flow near the facade in single-sided natural ventilation systems (SSV). The results showed that a jet of air from the mixing layer is the main flow structure in the opening. Comparisons between ventilation rates for openings at different positions on the building facade have demonstrated the importance of the role of opening pressure in one-way natural ventilation.

Some research related to fire safety with a focus on facade treatment is covered in the literature.

Lugaresi et al. [140] presented a review of the mechanical behaviour of facades in fire situations and their failure mechanisms. Facade system failure can occur due to different mechanisms; it can be induced by thermal degradation of mechanical properties and thermal expansion. Mechanical failure can cause parts of the facade to fall. Depending on its size, the falling part can become an obstacle to evacuation and firefighting activities or can have even greater consequences for safety. The article lists the different support systems, including curtain walls, that are essential for maintaining integrity. It compares the mechanical and thermal properties that influence the failure of non-combustible components such as stone, concrete, metal and glass panels, and discusses the behaviour of typical connections. Based on the research, it can be concluded that the fire behaviour of typical facade support systems, such as light steel railings and frames, and typical facade connections is very limited. The collapse of heavy stone panels must be avoided; for this, the effect of high temperature on the breaking load of dowel connections must be understood. Deformation of the metal frame and failure of metal brackets are mechanisms that need to be explored.

Zhang et al. [141] investigated the evolution of the facade flame height for fires in poorly ventilated compartments with triangular openings limited by a vertical wall. The results revealed that the vertical wall hardly affected the temperature of the hot gas inside the compartment, meaning that the vertical wall hardly alters the state of combustion inside the compartment with a triangular opening. The height of the facade flame increases when the distance between the facade wall and the vertical wall is less than a critical value. Based on the balance of momentum and buoyancy in the opening, a characteristic length L3 was proposed to describe the effect of a vertical wall. With a proposed correction factor κ related to the characteristic length L3 and the distance between two walls D, a new global model was developed to predict the facade flame height for triangular opening with and without vertical wall. This work extended the knowledge about the danger of fires in compartments involving triangular openings to cases with vertically facing walls.

In order to characterize the dynamics of fire propagation, Mendez et al. [142] carried out a parametric experimental study on a ventilated facade using a medium-scale test bench consisting of a non-combustible cladding wall and a combustible wall, varying the flame height, the heat flux incident on the wall of the non-combustible cavity, the given oxygen consumption, the cavity widths (50, 100 and 150mm) and the cladding materials (ACP-PE, aluminium composite panel with polyethylene core, ACP-FR, aluminium composite panel with polyethylene composite core and fire retardant, PF, phenolic insulating foam, and PIR, a polyurethane-based polyisocyanurate foam). The results show that there is a strong relationship between the height of the flame and the rate of heat release during the growth phase of the fire. As the cavity width was reduced, the time to failure of the encapsulation and subsequent ignition of the cladding material core decreased, as heat transfer to the walls was improved. Considering the interaction of the materials used in the facade and their geometry for the design of facade assemblies taking into account the fire performance of the system is of paramount importance. Increased heat transfer to the opposite wall was identified with all materials, which could lead to external heat fluxes above the critical heat flux for ignition of various combustible cladding materials. The results also demonstrated that the material performance observed at bench scale may fail to capture the performance in heat transfer and flame propagation scenarios observed at system scale.

Dong et al. [33] reviewed three potential risks typical of double facades, such as overheating, structural and fire risks, and analysed their manifestations, influencing factors and possible mitigations. The double facade is a passive renewable technique that is widely used due to its ability to reduce energy consumption by improving natural ventilation. The simultaneous occurrence of night-time insulation requirements and daytime overheating risks in a single day is a building concern that is often ignored [143]. It is crucial to consider the relevance of the thermal performance of double facades to safety. It is important to consider not only their energy performance, but also their application scenarios and the corresponding areas of risk. From the review, it was possible to conclude that by optimizing the design parameters (e.g. cavity depth) of the double facade or by adding additional components, the risk of overheating can be mitigated. Overheating is the most common risk in double facades, and the risk is greatest in hot areas or on sunny days, due to direct sunlight and inadequate ventilation, whereby the temperature of the cavity can rise from 10 to 30°C up to 80°C. Wind-induced vibrations, earthquakes or impacts from explosions are the causes of the second risk, structural damage to the double facade. Structural risk is an unavoidable element for buildings. The higher the building, the greater the wind loads to which it is subjected. Appropriate building shapes and ventilation sizes can improve airflow in and out of the double facade and reduce wind-induced vibrations. Perforated facades can be used to mitigate wind loads or, in cases of strong shocks, dampers can be used to minimize excessive movement of the double façade [33].

The cavities in the double facade present the potential risk of fire spreading in the event of a fire. The heat and smoke from a fire have complex coupling effects on the structures of the double facade, propagating along the cavity and causing flames to spread and glass to crack. Optimizing the design parameters of the double facade and adding perforated plates and refractory glass can reduce the risk of fire [33].

Final considerations

This review brought together in a single document a range of information characterising the ventilated facade system. It has reviewed the architectural and historical aspects of the system, the requirements that influence thermal performance and presented the advantages and disadvantages of this system; it has presented the definitions given by various authors over time, described the system characterising all its construction elements, reported the main types of coatings applied and the fixing system. It also described the main regulations that are attributed to the system and reported on the various studies and innovations in the literature, among other important requirements dealt with in the article.

As strategies for the sustainable development of cities to combat climate change, this review also discussed the growing awareness of improving the energy performance of buildings using VFS. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in sustainable building envelopes to reduce the impact of building development on the environment. Much of the research reviewed has emphasised the need for sustainable building facades, with the aim of achieving energy performance and also user habitability, i.e., interior comfort, well-being and satisfaction of those who pass through and enjoy the physical space.

Since the nineteen centuries in the northern European countries, the ventilated facade system (VFS) has been used as an aesthetic and thermal insulation solution for modern buildings around the world.

A ventilated facade system may be considered to be an aesthetical double parallel wall enclosing a chamber that, due to a pressure difference between the exterior and interior of the chamber, promotes an upward air flow to promote thermal and acoustic insulation of the building.

There are many advantages to using ventilated facade systems; however, there are also a series of challenges to be overcome, such as the high installation cost.

The several different existing types of VFS are a resulting of the external parameters (temperature, air velocity, among many others), climate conditions (solar radiation level, unexpected climatic events, for example), design characteristics (aesthetic, kind of materials, geometric factors, for example), among others, that cause a direct impact in the thermal and acoustic performance of the building.

The large number of different types of cladding has allowing architects to design a wide variety of facade combinations, involving metallic materials as steel and aluminium, ceramic materials as precast concrete, glass, stone, porcelain, cementitious boards, extruded ceramics, polymeric materials, natural (as wood) or synthetic (phenolic boards), composite materials and, more recently, photovoltaic modules.

The design of a VFS currently involves engineering and architectural elements to attempt much more than thermal comfort, such as control of the solar radiation, natural ventilation, a suitable combination of natural and artificial light, view to the outside and acoustic insulation. Such elements promote technical, economic and aesthetic gains.

The chimney effect is the main phenomena related to the air flow that causes the thermal insulation in the VFS. The temperature difference between the internal and external air and the height of the internal air assumes a critical role. Moreover, the drive pressure difference for ventilation is improved at higher chamber heights, favouring air flow and the maintenance of higher air temperature differences.

Thermal performance of VFS is a biological, environmental, and economic issue, which depends on different aspects, such as the composition and thermal performance of the layers, the insulation status of the interior facade, the height and width of the air gap, the type of ventilation, sun exposure and wind conditions, among others. Due to the complexity of the interaction among these factors, there is no consensus on the conditions that best describe the thermal behaviour of a VFS.

There is a lack of knowledge related to acoustic insulation in the system, showing potential of investigation.

Finally, the implementation of the system in the building influences various aspects, such as aesthetics, comfort and user performance. It is a promising system, which is increasingly evolving and allows for a variety of materials in its applicability.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Sara Medeiros dos Santos Pizzatto: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original draft preparation.

Fernando Otávio Pizzatto: Writing – Reviewing and Editing.

Fabiano Raupp Pereira: Writing – Reviewing and Editing.

Elídio Angioletto: Validation, Writing – Reviewing and Editing.

Sabrina Arcaro: Validation, Writing – Reviewing and Editing.

Oscar Rubem Klegues Montedo: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Reviewing and editing, Project administration.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to Foundation for the Support of Research and Innovation of the State of Santa Catarina (FAPESC/Brazil, process n. 1595/2021) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq/Brazil, process n. 306897/2022-9, 307702/2022-7, and 310328/2020-9) for the financial support to this work.

References
[1]
C.-M. Lai, S. Hokoi.
Solar façades: a review.
Build. Environ., 91 (2015), pp. 152-165
[2]
M. Ibañez-Puy, M. Vidaurre-Arbizu, J.A. Sacristán-Fernández, C. Martín-Gómez.
Opaque ventilated façades: thermal and energy performance review.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 79 (2017), pp. 180-191
[3]
L.F.B. da Silva, E. Thomaz, L.A. de Oliveira.
Ventilated cladding systems: structural and drainability performance criteria.
Ambient. Constr., 18 (2018), pp. 341-358
[4]
C. Bedon, D. Honfi, K.V. Machalická, M. Eliášová, M. Vokáč, M. Kozłowski, T. Wüest, F. Santos, N.W. Portal.
Structural characterisation of adaptive facades in Europe – Part II: Validity of conventional experimental testing methods and key issues.
J. Build. Eng., 25 (2019), pp. 100797
[5]
A.C.F. Maciel, M.T. Carvalho.
Operational energy of opaque ventilated façades in Brazil.
J. Build. Eng., 25 (2019), pp. 100775
[6]
A. Martinez, M. Patterson, A. Carlson, D. Noble.
Fundamentals in façade retrofit practice.
Proc. Eng., 118 (2015), pp. 934-941
[7]
M.A. Shameri, M.A. Alghoul, K. Sopian, M.F.M. Zain, O. Elayeb.
Perspectives of double skin façade systems in buildings and energy saving.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 15 (2011), pp. 1468-1475
[8]
D. Davidovic, J. Srebric, E.F.P. Burnett.
Modeling convective drying of ventilated wall chambers in building enclosures.
Int. J. Therm. Sci., 45 (2006), pp. 180-189
[9]
R.A. Agathokleous, S.A. Kalogirou.
Double skin facades (DSF) and building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV): a review of configurations and heat transfer characteristics.
Renew. Energy, 89 (2016), pp. 743-756
[10]
F.E. Boafo, J.-H. Kim, J.-G. Ahn, S.-M. Kim, J.-T. Kim.
Slim curtain wall spandrel integrated with vacuum insulation panel: a state-of-the-art review and future opportunities.
J. Build. Eng., 42 (2021), pp. 102445
[11]
S. Habibi, O.P. Valladares, D.M. Peña.
Sustainability performance by ten representative intelligent Façade technologies: a systematic review.
Sust. Energy Technol. Assess., 52 (2022), pp. 102001
[12]
H. Alkhatib, P. Lemarchand, B. Norton, D.T.J. O'Sullivan.
Deployment and control of adaptive building facades for energy generation, thermal insulation, ventilation and daylighting: a review.
Appl. Therm. Eng., 185 (2021), pp. 116331
[13]
F. Pomponi, P.A.E. Piroozfar, R. Southall, P. Ashton, E.R.P. Farr.
Energy performance of double-skin façades in temperate climates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 54 (2016), pp. 1525-1536
[14]
P. Seferis, P. Strachan, A. Dimoudi, A. Androutsopoulos.
Investigation of the performance of a ventilated wall.
Energy Build., 43 (2011), pp. 2167-2178
[15]
F. Ascione, N. Bianco, T. Iovane, M. Mastellone, G.M. Mauro.
The evolution of building energy retrofit via double-skin and responsive façades: a review.
Sol. Energy, 224 (2021), pp. 703-717
[16]
Eliane.
Eliane Tec.
(2023),
[17]
A. De Gracia, A. Castell, L. Navarro, E. Oró, L.F. Cabeza.
Numerical modelling of ventilated facades: a review.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 22 (2013), pp. 539-549
[18]
A.C. Fernandes Maciel, M.T. Carvalho.
Methodology used to investigate the energy savings of opaque ventilated façades in residential buildings in Brazil.
MethodsX, 8 (2021), pp. 101227
[19]
S. Fantucci, V. Serra, C. Carbonaro.
An experimental sensitivity analysis on the summer thermal performance of an opaque ventilated façade.
Energy Build., 225 (2020), pp. 110354
[20]
H.-Y. Chan, S.B. Riffat, J. Zhu.
Review of passive solar heating and cooling technologies.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 14 (2010), pp. 781-789
[21]
C. Sanjuan, M.J. Suárez, M. González, J. Pistono, E. Blanco.
Energy performance of an open-joint ventilated façade compared with a conventional sealed cavity façade.
Sol. Energy, 85 (2011), pp. 1851-1863
[22]
S. Aneli, R. Arena, G. Tina, A. Gagliano.
Assessment of Thermal Behaviour of Bifacial Ventilated Photovoltaic Facades Through Both Fluid Dynamic and Experimental Analyses.
[23]
G.M. Tina, F.B. Scavo, S. Aneli, A. Gagliano.
Assessment of the electrical and thermal performances of building integrated bifacial photovoltaic modules.
J. Clean. Prod., 313 (2021), pp. 127906
[24]
A. Gagliano, S. Aneli, F. Nocera.
Analysis of the performance of a building solar thermal facade (BSTF) for domestic hot water production.
Renew. Energy, 142 (2019), pp. 511-526
[25]
M.N. Sánchez, E. Giancola, M.J. Suárez, E. Blanco, M.R. Heras.
Experimental evaluation of the airflow behaviour in horizontal and vertical open joint ventilated facades using Stereo-PIV.
Renew. Energy, 109 (2017), pp. 613-623
[26]
A. Gagliano, F. Patania, A. Ferlito, F. Nocera, A. Galesi.
Computational fluid dynamic simulations of natural convection in ventilated facades.
Evaporation, Condensation and Heat Transfer, InTech, (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/19817
[27]
A. Müller, O.E. Alarcon.
Desenvolvimento de um sistema de fachada ventilada com placas cerâmicas de grês porcelanato voltado para a construção civil do Brasil.
Cerâmica, 51 (2005), pp. 354-361
[28]
B. Huang, S. Chen, W. Lu, K.M. Mosalam.
Seismic demand and experimental evaluation of the nonstructural building curtain wall: a review.
Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 100 (2017), pp. 16-33
[29]
A. Zöllner, E.R.F. Winter, R. Viskanta.
Experimental studies of combined heat transfer in turbulent mixed convection fluid flows in double-skin-façades.
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 45 (2002), pp. 4401-4408
[30]
N. Safer, M. Woloszyn, J.J. Roux.
Three-dimensional simulation with a CFD tool of the airflow phenomena in single floor double-skin facade equipped with a venetian blind.
Sol. Energy, 79 (2005), pp. 193-203
[31]
W. Ding, Y. Hasemi, T. Yamada.
Natural ventilation performance of a double-skin façade with a solar chimney.
Energy Build., 37 (2005), pp. 411-418
[32]
V.M. Soto Francés, E.J. Sarabia Escriva, J.M. Pinazo Ojer, E. Bannier, V. Cantavella Soler, G. Silva Moreno.
Modeling of ventilated façades for energy building simulation software.
Energy Build., 65 (2013), pp. 419-428
[33]
Q. Dong, X. Zhao, Y. Song, J. Qi, L. Shi.
Determining the potential risks of naturally ventilated double skin façades.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 191 (2024), pp. 114064
[34]
O. Zogou, H. Stapountzis.
Experimental validation of an improved concept of building integrated photovoltaic panels.
Renew. Energy, 36 (2011), pp. 3488-3498
[35]
F. Peci López, M. Ruiz de Adana Santiago.
Sensitivity study of an opaque ventilated façade in the winter season in different climate zones in Spain.
Renew. Energy, 75 (2015), pp. 524-533
[36]
M.J. Suárez, C. Sanjuan, A.J. Gutiérrez, J. Pistono, E. Blanco.
Energy evaluation of an horizontal open joint ventilated façade.
Appl. Therm. Eng., 37 (2012), pp. 302-313
[37]
M.N. Sánchez, C. Sanjuan, M.J. Suárez, M.R. Heras.
Experimental assessment of the performance of open joint ventilated façades with buoyancy-driven airflow.
Sol. Energy, 91 (2013), pp. 131-144
[38]
E. Giancola, C. Sanjuan, E. Blanco, M.R. Heras.
Experimental assessment and modelling of the performance of an open joint ventilated façade during actual operating conditions in Mediterranean climate.
Energy Build., 54 (2012), pp. 363-375
[39]
F. Stazi, F. Tomassoni, A. Vegliò, C. Di Perna.
Experimental evaluation of ventilated walls with an external clay cladding.
Renew. Energy, 36 (2011), pp. 3373-3385
[40]
F. Stazi, A. Vegliò, C. Di Perna.
Experimental assessment of a zinc–titanium ventilated façade in a Mediterranean climate.
Energy Build., 69 (2014), pp. 525-534
[41]
R.F. De Masi, V. Festa, S. Ruggiero, G.P. Vanoli.
Environmentally friendly opaque ventilated façade for wall retrofit: one year of in-field analysis in Mediterranean climate.
Sol. Energy, 228 (2021), pp. 495-515
[42]
C. Balocco.
A simple model to study ventilated facades energy performance.
Energy Build., 34 (2002), pp. 469-475
[43]
E. Gratia, A. De Herde.
Natural ventilation in a double-skin facade.
Energy Build., 36 (2004), pp. 137-146
[44]
F. Patania, A. Gagliano, F. Nocera, A. Ferlito, A. Galesi.
Thermofluid-dynamic analysis of ventilated facades.
Energy Build., 42 (2010), pp. 1148-1155
[45]
A. Gonçalves, R. Lopes.
Analysis of the system of ventilated facades in residential buildings.
J. Exact Sci., 21 (2019), pp. 5-11
[46]
F. Stazi, G. Ulpiani, M. Pergolini, C. Di Perna, M. D’Orazio.
The role of wall layers properties on the thermal performance of ventilated facades: experimental investigation on narrow-cavity design.
Energy Build., 209 (2020), pp. 109622
[47]
M. Rahiminejad, D. Khovalyg.
Review on ventilation rates in the ventilated air-spaces behind common wall assemblies with external cladding.
Build. Environ., 190 (2021), pp. 107538
[48]
O.E.d.E. Britannica.
“Palácio de Cristal”. Enciclopédia Britânica.
(2021),
[49]
D. Saelens.
Energy Performance Assessments of Single Storey Multiple-skin Facades.
Catholic University of Leuven, (2002),
[50]
O. Kalyanova.
Double-Skin Facade – Modelling and Experimental Investigations of Thermal Performance (DCE thesis).
Aalborg University, (2008),
[51]
A. Ghaffarianhoseini, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, U. Berardi, J. Tookey, D.H.W. Li, S. Kariminia.
Exploring the advantages and challenges of double-skin façades (DSFs).
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 60 (2016), pp. 1052-1065
[52]
S. Preet, J. Mathur, S. Mathur.
Influence of geometric design parameters of double skin façade on its thermal and fluid dynamics behavior: a comprehensive review.
Sol. Energy, 236 (2022), pp. 249-279
[53]
H. Poirazis.
Double Skin Façades for Office Buildings, Literature Review.
(2004), pp. 1-196
[54]
T.M. Góes, C.D.N. Amorim, C.F. e Silva.
Fachadas duplas: desempenho termoenergético de alternativas de projeto em edifícios comerciais no contexto climático de brasília.
Gestão Do Ambiente Construído, Atena Editora, (2020), pp. 1-20 http://dx.doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.0092019021
[55]
S. Barbosa, K. Ip.
Perspectives of double skin façades for naturally ventilated buildings: a review.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 40 (2014), pp. 1019-1029
[56]
A. Ribeiro, H. Mariot, E. Angioletto, A. De Noni Junior.
Fire exposure behavior of epoxy reinforced with jute fiber applied to ceramic tiles for a ventilated facade system.
[57]
A. GhaffarianHoseini.
Intelligent facades in low-energy buildings.
Br. J. Environ. Clim. Change, 2 (2013), pp. 437-464
[58]
C. Marinosci, P.A. Strachan, G. Semprini, G.L. Morini.
Empirical validation and modelling of a naturally ventilated rainscreen façade building.
Energy Build., 43 (2011), pp. 853-863
[59]
C. Marinosci, G. Semprini, G.L. Morini.
Experimental analysis of the summer thermal performances of a naturally ventilated rainscreen façade building.
Energy Build., 72 (2014), pp. 280-287
[60]
Z. Lin, Y. Song, Y. Chu.
An experimental study of the summer and winter thermal performance of an opaque ventilated facade in cold zone of China.
Build. Environ., 218 (2022), pp. 109108
[61]
E. Pujadas-Gispert, M.F.S. Alsailani, K.C.A. van Dijk, A.D.K. Rozema, J.P. ten Hoope, C.C. Korevaar, S.P.G. Moonen (Faas).
Design, construction, and thermal performance evaluation of an innovative bio-based ventilated façade.
Front. Archit. Res., 9 (2020), pp. 681-696
[62]
A. Gagliano, F. Nocera, S. Aneli.
Thermodynamic analysis of ventilated façades under different wind conditions in summer period.
Energy Build., 122 (2016), pp. 131-139
[63]
R.F. De Masi, S. Ruggiero, G.P. Vanoli.
Hygro-thermal performance of an opaque ventilated façade with recycled materials during wintertime.
Energy Build., 245 (2021), pp. 110994
[64]
T.E. Jiru, F. Haghighat.
Modeling ventilated double skin façade – a zonal approach.
Energy Build., 40 (2008), pp. 1567-1576
[65]
F. Stazi, C. Di Perna, P. Munafò.
Durability of 20-year-old external insulation and assessment of various types of retrofitting to meet new energy regulations.
Energy Build., 41 (2009), pp. 721-731
[66]
M. Ciampi, F. Leccese, G. Tuoni.
Ventilated facades energy performance in summer cooling of buildings.
Sol. Energy, 75 (2003), pp. 491-502
[67]
E. Halawa, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, A. Ghaffarianhoseini, J. Trombley, N. Hassan, M. Baig, S.Y. Yusoff, M. Azzam Ismail.
A review on energy conscious designs of building façades in hot and humid climates: lessons for (and from) Kuala Lumpur and Darwin.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 82 (2018), pp. 2147-2161
[68]
Alu-Stock Lontana Group.
Residencial Ripagaina Park.
(2025),
[69]
ULMA.
Mercado “La Alquería” em Sevilha, com Fachada Ventilada ULMA.
(2025),
[70]
A. Sandak, J. Sandak, M. Brzezicki, A. Kutnar.
Bio-based Building Skin.
[71]
A. Tapparo.
Engineered Wood Glass Combination – Innovative Glazing Façade System.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19797.73445
[72]
Hilti.
Enquadramentos de fachadas ventiladas – Hilti Portugal.
(2023),
[73]
Portobello.
Fachadas Ventiladas.
(2023),
[74]
Organização Europeia de Aprovações Técnicas.
ETAG 034 – Diretriz para Aprovação Técnica Europeia de Kits para Revestimentos de Paredes Externas.
(2012),
[75]
A. Tabadkani, A. Roetzel, H.X. Li, A. Tsangrassoulis.
Design approaches and typologies of adaptive facades: a review.
Autom. Constr., 121 (2021), pp. 103450
[76]
S. Yazdi Bahri, M. Alier Forment, A. Sanchez Riera, F. Bagheri Moghaddam, M.J. Casañ Guerrero, A.M. Llorens Garcia.
A literature review on thermal comfort performance of parametric façades.
Energy Rep., 8 (2022), pp. 120-128
[77]
S. Mirrahimi, M.F. Mohamed, L.C. Haw, N.L.N. Ibrahim, W.F.M. Yusoff, A. Aflaki.
The effect of building envelope on the thermal comfort and energy saving for high-rise buildings in hot–humid climate.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 53 (2016), pp. 1508-1519
[78]
L. Wang, J. Gwilliam, P. Jones.
Case study of zero energy house design in UK.
Energy Build., 41 (2009), pp. 1215-1222
[79]
G. Quesada, D. Rousse, Y. Dutil, M. Badache, S. Hallé.
A comprehensive review of solar facades. Transparent and translucent solar facades.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 16 (2012), pp. 2643-2651
[80]
I. Cetiner, E. Özkan.
An approach for the evaluation of energy and cost efficiency of glass façades.
Energy Build., 37 (2005), pp. 673-684
[81]
J. Zhou, Y. Chen.
A review on applying ventilated double-skin facade to buildings in hot-summer and cold-winter zone in China.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 14 (2010), pp. 1321-1328
[82]
L.F.B. da Silva, E. Thomaz, L.A. de Oliveira.
Ventilated cladding systems: structural and drainability performance criteria.
Ambient. Constr., 18 (2018), pp. 341-358
[83]
American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM E 631-93a: Standard Terminology of Building Constructions.
[84]
American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM E 283 – Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen.
(2012),
[85]
American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM E 330 – Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Exterior Windows, Doors, Skylights and Curtain Walls by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference.
(2014),
[86]
American Society for Testing and Materials.
ASTM E 331 – Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference.
(2016),
[87]
Norme E uropéenne.
EN 13830: 2015 – Parede cortina – Norma do produto.
(2015),
[88]
EOTA – Organização Europeia de Aprovações Técnicas.
ETAGs (arquivo)|EOTA.
(2022),
[89]
Ente Nazionale Italiano Di Unificazione.
UNI 11018: Rivestimenti e sistemi di ancoraggio per facciate ventilate a montaggio meccanico – Istruzioni per la progettazione, l’esecuzione e la manutenzione – Rivestimenti lapidei e ceramic.
(2003),
[90]
F. Bazzocchi, S. Bertagni, C. Ciacci, E. Colonna, V. Di Naso.
Mechanical characterisation of a low-thickness ceramic tile cladding subject to ageing phenomena.
J. Build. Eng., 29 (2020), pp. 101105
[91]
Deutsches Institut für Normung.
DIN 18516-1: 2010 – Revestimento externo da parede, ventilado – Parte 1: Requisitos, princípios de teste.
(2010),
[92]
Deutsches Institut für Normung.
DIN 18516-3: 2021 – Revestimento externo da parede, ventilado – Parte 3: Pedra natural – Requisitos.
(2021),
[93]
Deutsches Institut für Normung.
DIN 18516-5: 2021 – Revestimento externo da parede, ventilado – Parte 5: Bloco de concreto, Requisitos, Design.
(2021),
[94]
International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
ISO/TS 17870-3:2023 é “Ceramic Tiles – Installation – Part 3: Installation of Large Format Porcelain Tiles and Panels by Mechanical Means onto a Supporting Structure”, Geneva.
(2023),
[95]
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas.
ABNT NBR 10821-1: 2017 – Esquadrias para Edificações – Parte 1: Esquadrias externas e internas – Terminologia, Rio de Janeiro.
(2017),
[96]
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas.
ABNT NBR 10821-2: 2017 – Esquadrias para Edificações – Parte 2: Esquadrias externas – Requisitos e classificação.
(2017),
[97]
A. Gagliano, S. Aneli.
Analysis of the energy performance of an opaque ventilated façade under winter and summer weather conditions.
Sol. Energy, 205 (2020), pp. 531-544
[98]
Z. Azkorra-Larrinaga, N. Romero-Anton, K. Martin-Escudero, G. Lopez-Ruiz, C. Giraldo-Soto.
Comparative summer thermal performance analysis between open ventilated facade and modular living wall.
Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 53 (2024), pp. 103919
[99]
T. Colinart, M. Bendouma, P. Glouannec.
Building renovation with prefabricated ventilated façade element: a case study.
Energy Build., 186 (2019), pp. 221-229
[100]
T.M.O. Diallo, X. Zhao, A. Dugue, P. Bonnamy, F. Javier Miguel, A. Martinez, T. Theodosiou, J.-S. Liu, N. Brown.
Numerical investigation of the energy performance of an opaque ventilated façade system employing a smart modular heat recovery unit and a latent heat thermal energy system.
Appl. Energy, 205 (2017), pp. 130-152
[101]
E. Naboni.
Seminar Notes Ventilated Opaque Walls Ventilated Opaque Walls – A Performance Simulation Method and Assessment of Simulated Performance.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Environmental Energy Technologies Division, (2007), pp. 1-10
[102]
G. Manioğlu, Z. Yılmaz.
Economic evaluation of the building envelope and operation period of heating system in terms of thermal comfort.
Energy Build., 38 (2006), pp. 266-272
[103]
A. Allouhi, Y. El Fouih, T. Kousksou, A. Jamil, Y. Zeraouli, Y. Mourad.
Energy consumption and efficiency in buildings: current status and future trends.
J. Clean. Prod., 109 (2015), pp. 118-130
[104]
PROCELINFO.
Centro Brasileiro de Informação de Eficiência Energética – Selo Procel Edificações.
(2021),
[105]
J. Peng, L. Lu, H. Yang.
An experimental study of the thermal performance of a novel photovoltaic double-skin facade in Hong Kong.
Sol. Energy, 97 (2013), pp. 293-304
[106]
L. Cao.
O que são fachadas cinéticas na Arquitetura? “What are Kinetic Facades in Architecture?.
ArchDaily Brasil, (2019),
[107]
S. Sarihi, F. Mehdizadeh Saradj, M. Faizi.
A critical review of façade retrofit measures for minimizing heating and cooling demand in existing buildings.
Sustain. Cities Soc., 64 (2021), pp. 102525
[108]
J. Yu, J. Yang, C. Xiong.
Study of dynamic thermal performance of hollow block ventilated wall.
Renew. Energy, 84 (2015), pp. 145-151
[109]
M. van Roosmalen, A. Herrmann, A. Kumar.
A review of prefabricated self-sufficient facades with integrated decentralised HVAC and renewable energy generation and storage.
Energy Build., 248 (2021), pp. 111107
[110]
S.S. Castro, M.J. Suárez López, D.G. Menéndez, E.B. Marigorta.
Decision matrix methodology for retrofitting techniques of existing buildings.
J. Clean. Prod., 240 (2019), pp. 118153
[111]
S. Soutullo, M.N. Sánchez, R. Enríquez, R. Olmedo, M.J. Jiménez, M.R. Heras.
Comparative thermal study between conventional and bioclimatic office buildings.
Build. Environ., 105 (2016), pp. 95-103
[112]
J. Santa Cruz Astorqui, C. Porras-Amores.
Ventilated Façade with double chamber and flow control device.
Energy Build., 149 (2017), pp. 471-482
[113]
F.O. Pizzatto, S.M.S. Pizzatto, S. Arcaro, O.R.K. Montedo, E. Junca.
Análise de desempenho de placas cerâmicas porosas obtidas com resíduo de vidro e lama de cal para aplicação em fachadas ventiladas.
Cerâmica, 67 (2021), pp. 388-398
[114]
S.M. dos, S. Pizzatto, F.O. Pizzatto, E. Angioletto, S. Arcaro, E. Junca, O.R. Klegues Montedo.
Thermal evaluation of the use of porous ceramic plates on ventilated façades – part II: thermal behavior.
Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 18 (2021), pp. 1734-1742
[115]
S.M.S. Pizzatto, F.O. Pizzatto, E. Angioletto, S. Arcaro, E. Junca, O.R.K. Montedo.
Thermal evaluation of the use of porous ceramic plates on ventilated façades – Part I: effect of composition and firing temperature on porosity and bending strength.
Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 18 (2021), pp. 2169-2177
[116]
S. Soudian, U. Berardi.
Experimental performance evaluation of a climate-responsive ventilated building façade.
J. Build. Eng., 61 (2022), pp. 105233
[117]
A. Picallo-Perez, J.M. Sala-Lizarraga.
Energy and exergy analysis of an experimental ventilated façade.
Energy Build., 280 (2023), pp. 112737
[118]
R.A. Mangkuto, D.N.A.T. Tresna, I.M. Hermawan, J. Pradipta, N. Jamala, B. Paramita, Atthaillah, Experiment and simulation to determine the optimum orientation of building-integrated photovoltaic on tropical building facades considering annual daylight performance and energy yield, Energy Built Environ. 5 (2023) 414–425, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBENV.2023.01.002.
[119]
S.S. Nagdeve, S. Manchanda, A. Dewan.
Thermal performance of indirect green façade in composite climate of India.
Build. Environ., 230 (2023), pp. 109998
[120]
R.M. Reffat, R. Ezzat.
Impacts of design configurations and movements of PV attached to building facades on increasing generated renewable energy.
Sol. Energy, 252 (2023), pp. 50-71
[121]
T.S. Sigi Kumar, K.A. Shafi, R.J. Thomas, J. Mohammed.
Experimental evaluation of the thermal performance of coir mat and green facade as wall insulation in a tropical climate.
Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog., 40 (2023), pp. 101757
[122]
N. Zhangabay, A. Tagybayev, A. Utelbayeva, S. Buganova, A. Tolganbayev, G. Tulesheva, A. Jumabayev, A. Kolesnikov, M. Kambarov, K. Imanaliyev, P. Kozlov.
Analysis of the influence of thermal insulation material on the thermal resistance of new facade structures with horizontal air channels.
Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 18 (2023), pp. e02026
[123]
E. Catto Lucchino, F. Goia.
Multi-domain model-based control of an adaptive façade based on a flexible double skin system.
Energy Build., 285 (2023), pp. 112881
[124]
M. Schaffer, L.A. Bugenings, O.K. Larsen, C. Zhang.
Exploring the potential of combining diffuse ceiling and double-skin facade for school renovations.
Build. Environ., 235 (2023), pp. 110199
[125]
H.-S. Ryu, K.-S. Park.
A study on the LEED energy simulation process using BIM.
Sustainability, 8 (2016), pp. 138
[126]
L. Sanhudo, N.M.M. Ramos, J. Poças Martins, R.M.S.F. Almeida, E. Barreira, M.L. Simões, V. Cardoso.
Building information modeling for energy retrofitting – a review.
Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 89 (2018), pp. 249-260
[127]
C. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, K. Liston.
Manual de BIM: Um Guia de Modelagem da Informação da Construção para Arquitetos, Engenheiros, Gerentes, Construtores e Incorporadores.
1st ed., (2013),
[128]
H. Sarmadi, M. Mahdavinejad.
A designerly approach to algae-based large open office curtain wall Façades to integrated visual comfort and daylight efficiency.
Sol. Energy, 251 (2023), pp. 350-365
[129]
A. Prosperi, M. Longo, P.A. Korswagen, M. Korff, J.G. Rots.
Sensitivity modelling with objective damage assessment of unreinforced masonry façades undergoing different subsidence settlement patterns.
Eng. Struct., 286 (2023), pp. 116113
[130]
C. Zhao, L. Zhang, Y. Zhang.
Exploring the effect of longwave radiation exchange on the energy balance of building façades in subtropical regions.
Build. Environ., 233 (2023), pp. 110096
[131]
B. Kahramanoğlu, N. Çakıcı Alp.
Enhancing visual comfort with Miura-ori-based responsive facade model.
J. Build. Eng., 69 (2023), pp. 106241
[132]
E. Kızılorenli, F. Maden, Modular responsive facade proposals based on semi-regular and demi-regular tessellation: daylighting and visual comfort, Front. Archit. Res. 12 (2023) 601–612, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOAR.2023.02.005.
[133]
S. Tao, N. Yu, Z. Ai, K. Zhao, F. Jiang.
Investigation of convective heat transfer at the facade with balconies for a multi-story building.
J. Build. Eng., 63 (2023), pp. 105420
[134]
A. Tabadkani, A. Nikkhah Dehnavi, F. Mostafavi, H.G. Naeini.
Targeting modular adaptive façade personalization in a shared office space using fuzzy logic and genetic optimization.
J. Build. Eng., 69 (2023), pp. 106118
[135]
A. Luna-Navarro, G. Lori, D. Callewaert, M. Overend.
Semi-automated vs manually controlled dynamic facades: assessment through a field study on multi-domain occupant satisfaction.
Energy Build., 286 (2023), pp. 112912
[136]
R. Falcão Socoloski, J.D. Bersch, M. Guerra, A. Borges Masuero.
The influence of temperature and rain moisture in mortar facades obtained through hygrothermal simulation.
Constr. Build. Mater., 370 (2023), pp. 130587
[137]
A. Zagubień, K. Wolniewicz.
Development and validation of a portable test stand for sound measurement near the building façade.
Measurement, 214 (2023), pp. 112856
[138]
M. Król, A. Król, P. Koper, J. Bielawski, G. Krajewski, W. Węgrzyński.
Wind driven natural flow through the different types of openings on the façade – an experimental investigation.
J. Build. Eng., 71 (2023), pp. 106491
[139]
N. Najafi Ziarani, M.J. Cook, F. Freidooni, P.D. O'Sullivan.
The role of near-façade flow in wind-dominant single-sided natural ventilation for an isolated three-storey building: an LES study.
Build. Environ., 235 (2023), pp. 110210
[140]
F. Lugaresi, P. Kotsovinos, P. Lenk, G. Rein.
Review of the mechanical failure of non-combustible facade systems in fire.
Constr. Build. Mater., 361 (2022), pp. 129506
[141]
Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, L. Chen, G. Zhou, H. Tao, L. Zhou, H. Yang.
Effect of vertical facing wall on facade flame height of under-ventilated compartment fire with triangular opening.
Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog., 38 (2023), pp. 101667
[142]
J.E. Mendez, M.S. McLaggan, D. Lange.
Upward flame spread behaviour of cladding materials on a medium-scale ventilated façade experimental setup with a single combustible wall.
Fire Saf. J., 142 (2024), pp. 104020
[143]
R. Yang, D. Li, M. Arıcı, S.L. Salazar, C. Zhang, Q. Fu, X. Yang, Q. Zheng.
Thermal performance of an innovative double-skin ventilated façade with multistep-encapsulated PCM integration.
J. Energy Storage, 73 (2023), pp. 109121
[144]
R.B. Jackson, C. Le Quéré, R.M. Andrew, J.G. Canadell, J.I. Korsbakken, Z. Liu, G.P. Peters, B. Zheng.
Global energy growth is outpacing decarbonization.
Environ. Res. Lett., 13 (2018), pp. 120401
[145]
M. González-Torres, L. Pérez-Lombard, J.F. Coronel, I.R. Maestre, D. Yan.
A review on buildings energy information: Trends, end-uses, fuels and drivers.
Energy Rep., 8 (2022), pp. 626-637
[146]
Q. Li, O. Boeckmann, M. Schaefer.
Systematic screening and evaluation for an optimal adsorbent in a facade-integrated adsorption-based solar cooling system for high-rise buildings.
Energy, 310 (2024), pp. 133092
[147]
G. Barone, I. Vardopoulos, S. Attia, C. Vassiliades.
Optimizing energy-efficient building renovation: Integrating double-skin façades with solar systems in the Mediterranean landscape.
Energy Rep., 12 (2024), pp. 2933-2945
[148]
G. Barone, C. Vassiliades, C. Elia, A. Savvides, S. Kalogirou.
Design optimization of a solar system integrated double-skin façade for a clustered housing unit.
Renew. Energy, 215 (2023), pp. 119023
Copyright © 2025. The Authors
Download PDF
Article options
Tools