x

¿Aún no está registrado?

Cree su cuenta. Regístrese en Elsevier y obtendrá: información relevante, máxima actualización y promociones exclusivas.

Registrarme ahora
Solicitud de permisos - Ayuda - - Regístrese - Teléfono 902 888 740
Buscar en

Indexada en:

Base de Datos sobre Literatura Latinoamericana en Ciencias de la Salud (LILACS), Internacional Serial Data System; Periódica-Índice de Revistas Latinoamericanas en Ciencias-CICH-UNAM; Bibliomex Salud; Ulrich´s International Directory; and Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC Data Bases), siicsalud.
Rev Med Hosp Gen Mex 2017;80:228-32 - DOI: 10.1016/j.hgmx.2016.10.002
Original Article
Mediastinitis, a model of care. Experience in the General Hospital of Mexico over 34 years (1982–2016)
Mediastinitis, un modelo de atención. Experiencia en el Hospital General de México en 34 años (1982-2016)
F.P. Navarro-Reynosoa,b,, , B. Vargas-Abregoa, A. Pérez-Romoa, R. Cicero-Sabidoa,c
a Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery Department, General Hospital of Mexico “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”, Mexico City, Mexico
b Secretary of Federal Health, Mexico City, Mexico
c Medicine Faculty, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
Recibido 01 septiembre 2016, Aceptado 03 octubre 2016
Abstract
Background

Mediastinitis is a potentially fatal condition. In addition to timely diagnosis, its prognosis depends on an early and systematic approach.

Objective

To describe the results of mediastinitis treatment over a period of 34 years in a teaching hospital, its evolution and the current model of care.

Materials and methods

Cross-sectional, retrospective and descriptive study of patients with mediastinitis admitted from 1 June 1982 to 30 July 2016. The analysed variables were demographic, classification and aetiology of mediastinitis, comorbidities, complications, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay and mortality.

Results

1880 patients were included of which 1496 (79.6%) were men. The mean age was 39.4±17.8 years. According to the classification of Endo, 603 (32.1%) corresponded to type I and 1277 (67.9%) to types IIA and IIB. According to the aetiology, in 910 cases the origin was odontogenic (48.4%), 526 due to retropharyngeal abscess (28%), 147 secondary to submandibular abscess (7.8%), 49 due to cervical lymphadenectomy (2.6%), 36 due to pharyngeal trauma (1.9%), 14 due to post-intubation tracheal rupture (0.7%) and 198 were of undetermined origin (10.6%). Mediastinotomy with right thoracotomy was performed in 86% and mediastinotomy with left thoracotomy was performed in 14%. Simultaneous tracheostomy was performed in 83% of cases, standardising this procedure since 2005. Mortality varied between periods and was 50% in 1982–1992, 41% in 1992–2001, 35% in 2002–2011 and 17% in 2012–2016.

Conclusion

Along with the standardisation of the management of mediastinitis, a fall in mortality from this cause has been observed over the years. The maturity of the proposed model of care is a result of, among other things, medical and scientific advances and the experience gained in this pathology over more than three decades.

Resumen
Antecedente

La mediastinitis es un padecimiento potencialmente fatal. Además del diagnóstico oportuno el pronóstico dependerá de un abordaje sistemático temprano.

Objetivo

Describir los resultados del tratamiento de la mediastinitis en un periodo de 34 años en un hospital escuela, su evolución y el modelo de atención vigente.

Material y métodos

Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y transversal de pacientes con mediastinitis ingresados del 1 de junio de 1982 al 30 de julio de 2016. Las variables que se analizan son demográficas, clasificación y etiología de la mediastinitis, comorbilidades, complicaciones, días de estancia en hospital y en terapia intensiva y mortalidad.

Resultados

Se incluye a 1880 pacientes de los cuales 1496 (79.6%) fueron hombres. La edad promedio fue de 39.4±17.8 años. Según la clasificación de Endo, 603 (32.1%) correspondieron al tipo I y 1277 (67.9%) a los tipos IIA y IIB. Según la etiología, en 910 casos fue de origen ondotogénico (48.4%), 526 por absceso retrofaríngeo (28%), 147 secundarios a absceso submandibular (7.8%), 49 a linfadenectomía cervical (2.6%), 36 a trauma faríngeo (1.9%), 14 a ruptura traqueal postintubación (0.7%) y 198 de origen indeterminado (10.6%). Se realizó mediastinotomía con toracotomía derecha en 86% y con toracotomia izquierda en 14%. La traqueostomía simultánea se realizó en el 83% de los casos, estandarizándose desde el año 2005. La mortalidad varió por periodos siendo de 50% en 1982 a 1992, de 41% en 1992 a 2001, de 35% en 2002 a 2011 y de 17% en 2012 a 2016.

Conclusión

A la par de una estandarización en el manejo de la mediastinitis, se observa un descenso en la mortalidad por esta causa con el pasar de los años. La madurez del modelo de atención que se propone responde entre otros a avances médico-científicos y a la experiencia acumulada en esta patología en más de tres décadas.

Keywords
Mediastinitis, Thoracic surgery, Emergency surgery, Neck abscess
Palabras clave
Mediastinitis, Cirugía de tórax, Cirugía de urgencia, Absceso de cuello
Background

The mediastinum is a closed compartment that contains vital structures such as the heart, the great vessels, trachea and bronchi. Inflammation of the connective tissue that surrounds these structures, known as mediastinitis, is the result of various factors and has a reported mortality rate of between 12% and 47%,1,2 with a better prognosis when a systematic approach is used that includes timely identification, confirmation and surgery. In its acute form, despite being considered a rare condition, mediastinitis is becoming more frequent in our field, and is a phenomenon that is apparently linked to the increase in the prevalence of chronic diseases. Scientific literature on the topic remains limited and largely consists of a series of cases.3 In the Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery Department of the General Hospital of Mexico, between 30 and 50 patients are treated every year for this illness. As this is considered to be a serious health problem, the systematisation and protocolisation of its management is necessary. This study aims to describe the results of the treatment of mediastinitis over a period of 34 years, its characteristics, risk factors, complications and progression, along with the current model of care at our site.

Materials and methodsStudy type

Retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional.

Patients and site

All patients that were admitted to hospital in Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery with a diagnosis of mediastinitis were enrolled. The General Hospital of Mexico is a public hospital with 1143 beds during the period between 1 June 1986 to 30 July 2016.

Variables of interest

The variables analysed were obtained directly from the Department's clinical and radiological files and computed databases of patients diagnosed with mediastinitis during the study period. Mediastinitis was classified according to the criteria of Endo,4 and, in the case of patients with descending necrotising mediastinitis (DNM), compliance with the diagnostic criteria of Estrera was also verified,5 with retrospective classification for cases that presented themselves prior to these classifications. The variables of interest were demographic, classification and aetiology of mediastinitis, comorbidities, complications, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay and mortality.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used. Quantitative variables are expressed in arithmetic means±standard deviation and qualitative variables in numbers and percentages.

Current model of care for mediastinitis

Includes the emergency surgical approach with posterolateral thoracotomy in layers. Once the thoracotomy has been performed, the lungs can be accessed if there are adhesions and a sample of pleural fluid is taken if there is any. In cases of DNM, the retrovisceral space connecting the neck with the mediastinum is examined in the first instance while dissecting the different structures. Then the retrosternal space connecting both hemithoraces is examined, and later the pretracheal, retroesophageal and preaortic spaces are dissected, ensuring that the azygos vein is properly released and allowing free drainage. Should this not be possible the vein should be ligated and cut. Once dissection of the mediastinum is complete, it is washed with a lukewarm sterile solution mixed with hydrogen peroxide to a ratio of 50:1, and two right chest tubes and one left are placed, which, depending on drainage, will be removed one at a time. In the case of DNM, management includes prior drainage of neck abscesses in the same surgery undertaken by the Otorhinolaryngology Department.

Results

A total of 1880 patients diagnosed with mediastinitis were included of which 1496 (79.6%) were men. The mean age was 39.4±17.8 years. Demographic characteristics, comorbidity, and the classification and aetiology of mediastinitis are shown in Table 1. Time to progression from the onset of the illness to hospital admission was on average 8.5±2.5 days. Approximately 78% of patients received some form of medical treatment prior to their arrival at hospital (mostly oral antibiotics). The average time from arrival at hospital to surgery was 6h. The radiological findings upon admission were: mediastinal widening (in 100% of cases), pneumomediastinum (93%), mediastinal abscess (25%), and a combination of these findings in 80% of cases. A chest CT scan was performed in all patients, which confirmed the findings of the chest X-ray. In cases of DNM, a pre- and postsurgical diagnosis was made according to the criteria of Estrera.5 Out of the total patients, mediastinotomy with right thoracotomy was performed in 86% and mediastinotomy with left thoracotomy was performed in 14%, a decision based on the clinical/radiological assessment of the cases. Time to removal of chest tubes varied from 7 to 45 days. Simultaneous tracheostomy was performed in 83% of cases, with this procedure being standardised since 2005. The bacteria isolated in positive cultures are shown in Table 2. Postsurgical morbidity rate was 3.77%. Postoperative complications are shown in Table 3. Mortality varied between periods and was 50% in 1982–1992, 41% in 1992–2001, 35% in 2002–2011 and 17% in 2012–2016 (see Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the patients included.

  n=1880
Male gender (%)  1496  79.6% 
Age in years, mean±SD  39.4±17.8
Comorbidity
Diabetes mellitus  1222  65% 
Obesity (BMI >30kg/m2), %  752  40% 
HIV-positive  57  3% 
Classification of endo (%)
Type I  603  32.1% 
Types IIA and IIB  1277  67.9% 
Aetiology (%)
Odontogenic  910  48.4% 
Retropharyngeal abscess  527  28.0% 
Undetermined  198  10.5% 
Submandibular abscess  147  7.8% 
Cervical lymphadenectomy  49  2.6% 
Pharyngeal trauma  36  1.9% 
Post-intubation tracheal rupture  14  0.7% 
Mechanical ventilation following surgery  1654  88.0% 
Duration of mechanical ventilation (in days), mean±standard deviation  6.0±2.5
Length of ICU stay (in days), mean±SD  21.3±14.3
Length of hospital stay (in days), mean±SD  32.3±16.5

SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; ICU, intensive care unit.

Table 2.

Bacteria isolated in positive cultures.

Acinetobacter baumannii 
Bacteroides fragilis 
Candida albicans 
Enterobacter cloacae 
Escherichia coli 
Fusobacterium sp. 
Klebsiella pneumoniae 
Peptococcus sp. 
Peptostreptococcus 
Proteus mirabilis 
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 
Staphylocccus aureus 
Staphylococcus epidermidis 
Table 3.

Postoperative complications.

  (n=) 
Necrosis of the cervical skin requiring plasty (grafting of the skin)  38  2.02 
Fibrosing mediastinitis without tracheal or vascular compression  19  1.01 
Bronchopleural fistula  0.43 
Fibrosing mediastinitis with vascular construction  0.05 
Purulent pericarditis  0.16 
Cutaneous/thoracic fistula  0.10 
Total  71  3.77 
Figure 1.
(0.07MB).

The declining trend in mortality at the hospital among patients treated for mediastinitis in the study period.

Discussion

Considered a rare condition, mediastinitis most frequently occurs in the postoperative period following sternotomy for cardiac surgery; it often arises from oesophageal perforation and DNM (severe oropharyngeal infection spreading to the thorax).2 Mediastinitis can be secondary to trauma to the central airway, cervical lymphadenitis and, to a lesser degree, the origin may be undetermined.6,3 The series of cases presented (the largest series of cases known to the authors to date) predominantly included patients with DNM and a smaller proportion of cases that were secondary to tracheal rupture of undetermined origin, which is explained due to the fact that in our hospital cardiac surgery patients and those with oesophageal perforation are mostly admitted to the cardiology and gastrosurgery departments, respectively.

As this is a serious disease with a high mortality rate, it is necessary to learn more from the case studies and standardise protocols for mediastinitis that will lead to better clinical outcomes. In the first instance, we note that this is an illness that affects young male adults with a male-female ratio of 4:1, similar to that already reported.3 The most common comorbidity was diabetes mellitus, a chronic disease that has been linked to the development of DNM7,8 and for this reason it is a risk factor for death due to this cause.9 Obesity has also proven to be a risk factor for the development of poststernotomy mediastinitis.10 Considering a significant proportion of the patients included (40%) had a body mass index of >30kg/m2, obesity could also play a role in influencing the development of mediastinitis of other origins, namely DNM. Deu-Martín et al.9 were also unable to find a delay in diagnosis/treatment of over 72h as a predictor of mortality; however, in the group of patients that was analysed, the delay in seeking medical attention was considerably lengthy, around eight days on average, with more than three-quarters of the patients having received some form of medical treatment. Despite the limited resources of public hospitals, time from diagnosis to surgery, which was 6h on average, is similar to that reported in other case series11; as it is considered to be an emergency surgical indication, mediastinitis, along with other thoracic surgical indications at our site, has been proven to have a better prognosis compared to surgical emergencies in areas other than the thorax.12

Although early intervention is considered to be an indicator of a good prognosis, there is currently no consensus as to the way in which to approach mediastinitis from a surgical point of view. There are groups that propose different approaches such as the technique of selection according to results (generally in small case series). The most described approaches are the transcervical,11,13 posterolateral thoracotomy,14,15 anterolateral thoracotomy16 and median sternotomy3 approaches, the transthoracic approach,6,17,18 and those of thoracoscopy and mediastinoscopy1,19 and variations or combinations of the techniques described18,20–23 with or without adjuvant treatments such as the use of a hyperbaric chamber24 or vacuum devices.25 One of the biggest controversies continues to be the treatment of mediastinitis, which is limited to the superior mediastinum above the tracheal carina2,26,27 in which there are those that advocate a conservative approach. Our stance is to opt for a thoracotomy from the outset.

The proposed model of care (right posterolateral thoracotomy in layers, connecting both hemithoraces through the retrosternal space, dissection and washing of the mediastinum, placing two endopleural tubes in the right hemithorax and one in the left, and where necessary, prior cervical drainage with cervico-mediastinal retrovisceral access) has been in place since 2005 at our site and with good results. Early tracheotomy during initial surgery appears to be a promising strategy14 that is associated with better results. We have observed that the mortality rate for mediastinitis at our site has decreased on par with the global trend.28,29 The phenomenon of the decrease in mortality at this institution may well be a result of the protocolisation of the approach, medical and scientific advances that include broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic therapy, management protocols in intensive care units, ongoing monitoring by medical specialists at these units and technological advances in organ support,30,31 as well as early recognition and surgical treatment20,32 among other things.

One of the greatest advantages of the study that we are presenting is the number of patients included and the period that the study covers; however, at the moment its retrospective nature limits it to describing only a few variables in detail. While the proposed model of care has shown good results at our site, the validation of same requires a more stringent design that can compare groups that have been subject to different techniques.

Conclusions

Mediastinitis continues to be a serious condition with a high mortality rate. To date, there is no consensus regarding the best surgical technique for its treatment. In our experience, along with the standardisation of the management of mediastinitis, we have observed a fall in mortality from this cause over the years. The maturity of the proposed model of care is a result of, among other things, medical and scientific advances and the experience gained in this pathology over more than three decades.

Ethical disclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to the drafting of this manuscript.

References
1
H. Ishinaga,K. Otsu,H. Sakaida
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis from deep neck infection
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 270 (2013), pp. 1463-1466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2182-5
2
P. Martínez Vallina,D. Espinosa Jiménez,L. Hernández Pérez
Mediastinitis
Arch Bronconeumol, 47 (2011), pp. 32-36 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-2896(11)70019-9
3
L.M. Cirino,F.M. Elias,J.L. Almeida
Descending mediastinitis: a review
Sao Paulo Med J, 124 (2006), pp. 285-290
4
S. Endo,F. Murayama,T. Hasegawa
Guideline of surgical management based on diffusion of descending necrotizing mediastinitis
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 47 (1999), pp. 14-19
5
A.S. Estrera,M.J. Landay,J.M. Grisham
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 157 (1983), pp. 545-552
6
H. Alsoub,K.C. Chacko
Descending necrotising mediastinitis
Postgrad Med J, 71 (1995), pp. 98-101
7
M.E. Ramírez Martínez,J.F. Peña García,J.A. Marín Méndez
Absceso profundo de cuello, un reto terapéutico
Cir Gen, 26 (2004), pp. 282-285
8
W.L. Dajer-Fadel,C. Ibarra-Pérez,L.D. Sánchez-Velázquez
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis below the tracheal carina
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 22 (2014), pp. 176-182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0218492313485589
9
M. Deu-Martín,M. Saez-Barba,I. López Sanz
Mortality risk factors in descending necrotizing mediastinitis
Arch Bronconeumol, 46 (2010), pp. 182-187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2010.01.008
10
J.E. Molina,R.S. Lew,K.J. Hyland
Postoperative sternal dehiscence in obese patients: incidence and prevention
Ann Thorac Surg, 78 (2004), pp. 912-917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.03.038
11
G.J. Kocher,B. Hoksch,M. Caversaccio
Diffuse descending necrotizing mediastinitis: surgical therapy and outcome in a single-centre series
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 42 (2012), pp. e66-e72 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezs385
12
P. Álvarez-Maldonado,A. Pérez-Rosales,C. Núñez-Pérez Redondo
Cirugía de urgencia torácica versus no torácica. Resultados en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Respiratorios
Rev Asoc Mex Med Crit Ter Int, 3 (2015), pp. 133-137
13
X. Guan,W.J. Zhang,X. Liang
Optimal surgical options for descending necrotizing mediastinitis of the anterior mediastinum
Cell Biochem Biophys, 70 (2014), pp. 109-114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12013-014-9865-z
14
R.A. Pérez,R.G. Cueto,R.G. de la Escosura
Mediastinitis necrosante descendente. Resultados del tratamiento médico-quirúrgico en 17 casos
Gac Méd Méx, 3 (2003), pp. 199-204
15
P. Macrí,M.F. Jiménez,N. Novoa
A descriptive analysis of a series of patients diagnosed with acute mediastinitis
Arch Bronconeumol, 39 (2003), pp. 428-430
16
B.M. Buchholz,A. Kania,M. Kaminski
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: treatment concept with focus on thoracic surgery
17
M.J. Corsten,F.M. Shamji,P.F. Odell
Optimal treatment of descending necrotising mediastinitis
Thorax, 52 (1997), pp. 702-708
18
C.I. Bayarri Lara,S. Sevilla López,A. Sánchez-Palencia Ramos
Surgical management of descending necrotizing mediastinitis
19
J. D’Cunha,M. James,M.B. Antonoff
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: a modified algorithmic approach to define a new standard of care
Surg Infect (Larchmt), 14 (2013), pp. 525-531
20
T. Wakahara,Y. Tanaka,Y. Maniwa
Successful management of descending necrotizing mediastinitis
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 19 (2011), pp. 228-231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0218492311408641
21
A. Sandner,J. Börgermann
Update on necrotizing mediastinitis: causes, approaches to management, and outcomes
Curr Infect Dis Rep, 13 (2011), pp. 278-286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11908-011-0174-z
22
Y. Nakamori,S. Fujimi,H. Ogura
Conventional open surgery versus percutaneous catheter drainage in the treatment of cervical necrotizing fasciitis and descending necrotizing mediastinitis
Am J Roentgenol, 182 (2004), pp. 1443-1449
23
Y. Inoue,M. Gika,K. Nozawa
Optimum drainage method in descending necrotizing mediastinitis
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 4 (2005), pp. 189-192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2004.105395
24
M. De Feo,M. Vicchio,P. Santè
Evolution in the treatment of mediastinitis: single-center experience
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 19 (2011), pp. 39-43 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0218492310395789
25
Y.T. Liew,E.Y. Lim,A.B. Zulkiflee
Severe descending necrotizing mediastinitis: vacuum-assisted dressing did wonder
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, (2016),
[Epub ahead of print] PMID: 27016203 Mar 25
26
G.J. Ridder,W. Maier,S. Kinzer
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: contemporary trends in etiology, diagnosis, management, and outcome
27
Y. Sumi,H. Ogura,Y. Nakamori
Nonoperative catheter management for cervical necrotizing fasciitis with and without descending necrotizing mediastinitis
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 134 (2008), pp. 750-756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.134.7.750
28
H.M. Prado-Calleros,E. Jiménez-Fuentes,I. Jiménez-Escobar
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: systematic review on its treatment in the last 6 years, 75 years after its description
Head Neck, 38 (2016), pp. E2275-E2283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.24183
29
O. Aliu,R.J. Diaz-Garcia,L. Zhong
Mortality trends and the effects of débridement timing in the management of mediastinitis in the United States, 1998 to 2010
Plast Reconstr Surg, 134 (2014), pp. 457e-463e http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000422
30
M. Krüger,S. Decker,J.P. Schneider
Surgical treatment of acute mediastinitis
31
P. Álvarez-Maldonado,A. Pérez-Rosales,G. Cueto-Robledo
Clinical performance and resource utilisation of a respiratory intensive care unit. Analysis of five years of clinical activity
Rev Med Hosp Gen Méx, 79 (2016), pp. 144-149
32
A. Sandner,J. Börgermann,S. Kösling
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: early detection and radical surgery are crucial
J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 65 (2007), pp. 794-800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.075
Corresponding author at: Servicio de Neumología y Cirugía de Tórax, Hospital General de México “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”, Dr. Balmis 148, C.P. 06726, Mexico City, Mexico. (F.P. Navarro-Reynoso franciscopnavarro@yahoo.com.mx)
Copyright © 2016. Sociedad Médica del Hospital General de México