Buscar en
Cuadernos de Economía
Toda la web
Inicio Cuadernos de Economía The determinants of the choice of exchange rate regimes in Latin America: a mixe...
Información de la revista
Vol. 34. Núm. 95.
Páginas 55-61 (Mayo - Agosto 2011)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 34. Núm. 95.
Páginas 55-61 (Mayo - Agosto 2011)
Acceso a texto completo
The determinants of the choice of exchange rate regimes in Latin America: a mixed multinomial logit approach
Determinantes de la elección del régimen cambiario en América Latina: una aproximación a un modelo logit multinomial mixto
Visitas
1381
Pedro Álvarez Ondinaa, José Luis Pérez Riverob,
Autor para correspondencia
jrivero@uniovi.es

Corresponding author.
, Saúl de Vicente Queijeirob, María Rosalía Vicente Cuervob
a Departamento de Investigación de Bankia, Madrid, Spain
b Departamento de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Oviedo, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Abstract

The choice of the exchange rate regime is one of the most significant monetary policy decisions that any economic authority has to make nowadays. Indeed, there have been many studies from a theoretical and empirical point of view, but the only common conclusion would be the lack of consensus. In the past this topic has been modeled by binary probit or cross-sectional multinomial logit models, both of which have weaknesses in the assumptions of the choices. In this paper, such issue is faced by means of a panel mixed multinomial logit model, which allows for substitution pattern among the three types of exchange rate regimes: fixed, intermediate, and flexible. Three types of choice determinants are explored: those stated by the Optimum Currency Area (OCA) theory, types of shocks and vulnerability to currency crises, using a sample of 21 Latin American countries over the period 1980–2004.

Keywords:
Exchange Rate Regime
Optimum Currency Area
Currency Crisis
Mixed multinomial logit model
Resumen

La elección del régimen cambiario constituye una de las decisiones de política económica más relevantes a las que se enfrentan las autoridades monetarias de cualquier país. Existe una amplia literatura, tanto teórica como empírica, cuyo principal resultado es la falta de consenso acerca de los determinantes de la elección del régimen cambiario. Tradicionalmente, este problema se había tratado mediante modelos probit binarios o modelos logit multinomiales de corte transversal, presentando ambos debilidades en la estimación. En este artículo, esta cuestión se afronta mediante un modelo logit multinomial con datos de panel que permite la correlación de los errores en el tiempo, así como una mayor flexibilidad en la elección de las alternativas. Se analizan tres tipos de determinantes en la elección de régimen cambiario: aquellos que se derivan de la teoría de las Áreas Monetarias Óptimas, los relativos a los tipos de shocks y los que se refieren a la propensión a las crisis cambiarias, utilizando una muestra de 21 países de América Latina para el periodo 1980–2004.

Palabras clave:
Regímenes Cambiarios
Áreas Monetarias Óptimas
Crisis Cambiarias
Logit multinomial mixto
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[Álvarez Ondina and Pérez Rivero, 2007]
P. Álvarez Ondina, J.L. Pérez Rivero, S. De Vicente Queijeiro, M.R. Vicente Cuervo.
¿Por qué los países fijan el tipo de cambio? Applied Economic Department Working Papers.
University of Oviedo, (2007),
[Barro and Gordon, 1983]
R. Barro, D.B. Gordon.
Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy.
Journal of Monetary Economics, 12 (1983), pp. 101-121
[Calvo and Reinhart, 2002]
G.A Calvo, C.M. Reinhart.
Fear of floating.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (2002), pp. 379-408
[Calvo, 1998]
G.A. Calvo.
Capital flows and capital-market crises: the simple economics of sudden stops.
Journal of Applied Economics, 1 (1998), pp. 35-54
[Carmignani et al., 2008]
F. Carmignani, E. Colombo, P. Tirelli.
Exploring different views of exchange rate regime choice.
Journal of International Money and Finance, 27 (2008), pp. 1177-1197
[Collins, 1996]
S.M. Collins.
On becoming more flexible: exchange rate regimes in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Journal of Development Economics, 51 (1996), pp. 117-138
[Dreyer, 1978]
J.S. Dreyer.
Determinants of exchange-rate regimes for currencies of developing countries: some preliminary results.
World Development, 6 (1978), pp. 437-445
[Edwards, 1996]
Edwards, S., 1996. The determinants of the choice between fixed and flexible exchange-rate regimes. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper No. 5756.
[Eichengreen and Hausmann, 2003]
Eichengreen, B., Hausmann, R., 2003. Original sin: the road to redemption. En: Eichengreen, B., Hausmann, R. (Eds). Debt denomination and financial instability in emerging market economics.
[Eichengreen, 1994]
B. Eichengreen.
International monetary arrangements for the 21st century.
The Brooking Institution, (1994),
[Giovazzi and Pagano, 1988]
F. Giovazzi, M. Pagano.
The advantage of trying one's hands: EMS discipline and Central Bank credibility.
European Economic Review, 32 (1988), pp. 1055-1082
[Heller, 1978]
R.H. Heller.
Determinants of exchange rate practices.
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 10 (1978), pp. 309-321
[Hensher and Greene, 2003]
D.A. Hensher, W.H. Greene.
The mixed logit model: the state of practice.
Transportation, 30 (2003), pp. 133-176
[IMF, 2004]
IMF.
Classification of exchange rate arrangements and monetary policy frameworks.
International Monetary Fund, (2004),
[Juhn and Mauro, 2002]
Juhn, G., Mauro, P., 2002. Long-run determinants of exchange regimes: a simple sensitivity analysis. International Monetary Fund. Working paper WP/02/104.
[Leblang, 1999]
D. Leblang.
Domestic political institutions and exchange rate commitments in the developing world.
International Studies Quarterly, 43 (1999), pp. 599-620
[Levy-Yeyati and Sturzenegger, 2003]
E. Levy-Yeyati, F. Sturzenegger.
A de facto classification of exchange rate regimes: a methodological note.
American Economic Review 93, (2003),
[Levy-Yeyati et al., 2010]
E. Levy-Yeyati, F. Sturzenegger, I. Reggio.
On the endogeneity of exchange rate regimes.
European Economic Review, 54 (2010), pp. 659-677
[Melvin, 1985]
M. Melvin.
The choice of and exchange rate system and macroeconomic stability, Journal of Money.
Credit and Banking, 17 (1985), pp. 467-478
[Méon and Rizzo, 2002]
P.G. Méon, J.M. Rizzo.
The viability of fixed exchange rate commitments: does politics matter?. A theoretical and empirical investigation ULB Institutional Repository 2013/8392.
Université Libre de Bruxelles, (2002),
[Mundell, 1961]
R.A. Mundell.
A theory of optimum currency areas.
The American Economic Review, 51 (1961), pp. 657-665
[Poole, 1970]
W. Poole.
Optimal choice of monetary policy instruments in a simple stochastic macro model.
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (1970), pp. 197-216
[Reinhart and Rogoff, 2003]
C.H. Reinhart, K.S. Rogoff.
The modern history of exchange rate arrangements: a reinterpretation.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics CXIX, (2003), pp. 1-48
[Rose, 2011]
A. Rose.
exchange rate regimes in the modern era: fixed, floating, and flaky.
CEPR Discussion Papers, (2011), pp. 7987
[Savvides, 1993]
A. Savvides.
Pegging the exchange rate and the choice of a standard by LDCs: a joint formulation.
Journal of Economic Development, 18 (1993), pp. 107-125
[Von Hagen and Zhou, 2007]
J. Von Hagen, J. Zhou.
The choice of exchange rate regime in developing countries: a multinational panel analysis.
Journal of International Money and Finance, 26 (2007), pp. 1071-1094
[Wong, 2005]
A. Wong.
Exchange rate arrangements in the low-income countries: a panel mixed logit analysis.
University of California-Berkeley, (2005),
Copyright © 2011. Asociación Cuadernos de Economía
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas