was read the article
array:24 [ "pii" => "S2387020619303122" "issn" => "23870206" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medcle.2019.02.026" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2019-08-16" "aid" => "4787" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U.. All rights reserved" "copyrightAnyo" => "2019" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "sco" "cita" => "Med Clin. 2019;153:165-8" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S002577531930137X" "issn" => "00257753" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medcli.2019.02.006" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2019-08-16" "aid" => "4787" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U." "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "sco" "cita" => "Med Clin. 2019;153:165-8" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 5 "HTML" => 5 ] "es" => array:10 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Artículo especial</span>" "titulo" => "Revisiones panorámicas. Otra forma de revisión de la literatura" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "165" "paginaFinal" => "168" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Scoping reviews. Another way of literature review" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Isabel Ruiz-Perez, Dafina Petrova" "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Isabel" "apellidos" => "Ruiz-Perez" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Dafina" "apellidos" => "Petrova" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2387020619303122" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medcle.2019.02.026" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2387020619303122?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S002577531930137X?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/00257753/0000015300000004/v1_201908010644/S002577531930137X/v1_201908010644/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2387020619303110" "issn" => "23870206" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medcle.2019.06.010" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2019-08-16" "aid" => "4777" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U." "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "pgl" "cita" => "Med Clin. 2019;153:169-77" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Consensus statement</span>" "titulo" => "Recommendations for the detection, diagnosis and follow-up of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in primary and hospital care" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "169" "paginaFinal" => "177" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Recomendaciones para la detección, diagnóstico y seguimiento de los pacientes con enfermedad por hígado graso no alcohólico en atención primaria y hospitalaria" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1547 "Ancho" => 2015 "Tamanyo" => 244507 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Algorithm for the detection and evaluation of NAFLD in primary care. 1: risk factors, obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, metabolic syndrome. 2: patients with fatty liver on ultrasound performed for any reason. FIB-4: Fibrosis 4 score; FLI: Fatty Liver Index; NFS: NAFLD fibrosis score.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Llorenç Caballeria, Salvador Augustin, Teresa Broquetas, Rosa Maria Morillas, Mercè Vergara, Silvia Virolés, Maria Rosa Hernández, Isabel Serra, Alberto Goday, Lluis Vila, Antonio Siso-Almirall, Rosa Solans, Jose Manuel Fernández-Real, Jose Antonio Carrión, Isabel Graupera, Pere Ginès" "autores" => array:16 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Llorenç" "apellidos" => "Caballeria" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Salvador" "apellidos" => "Augustin" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Teresa" "apellidos" => "Broquetas" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rosa Maria" "apellidos" => "Morillas" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Mercè" "apellidos" => "Vergara" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Silvia" "apellidos" => "Virolés" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Maria Rosa" "apellidos" => "Hernández" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Isabel" "apellidos" => "Serra" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Alberto" "apellidos" => "Goday" ] 9 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Lluis" "apellidos" => "Vila" ] 10 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Antonio" "apellidos" => "Siso-Almirall" ] 11 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rosa" "apellidos" => "Solans" ] 12 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jose Manuel" "apellidos" => "Fernández-Real" ] 13 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jose Antonio" "apellidos" => "Carrión" ] 14 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Isabel" "apellidos" => "Graupera" ] 15 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Pere" "apellidos" => "Ginès" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0025775319301241" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medcli.2019.01.030" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0025775319301241?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2387020619303110?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/23870206/0000015300000004/v1_201908170832/S2387020619303110/v1_201908170832/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2387020619303146" "issn" => "23870206" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medcle.2019.06.011" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2019-08-16" "aid" => "4824" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U." "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "rev" "cita" => "Med Clin. 2019;153:157-64" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Review</span>" "titulo" => "Relationship of human papillomavirus with diseases of the oral cavity" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "157" "paginaFinal" => "164" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "El virus del papiloma humano y su relación con la patología de la cavidad oral" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 788 "Ancho" => 2208 "Tamanyo" => 90244 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0005" "detalle" => "Fig. " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Comparative diagram showing normal deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication versus the mechanism of the human papilloma virus in the oncogenic process.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Núria Boguñá, Laia Capdevila, Enric Jané-Salas" "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Núria" "apellidos" => "Boguñá" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Laia" "apellidos" => "Capdevila" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Enric" "apellidos" => "Jané-Salas" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0025775319302350" "doi" => "10.1016/j.medcli.2019.02.027" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0025775319302350?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2387020619303146?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/23870206/0000015300000004/v1_201908170832/S2387020619303146/v1_201908170832/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:16 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Special article</span>" "titulo" => "Scoping reviews. Another way of literature review" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "165" "paginaFinal" => "168" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Isabel Ruiz-Perez, Dafina Petrova" "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Isabel" "apellidos" => "Ruiz-Perez" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "isabel.ruiz.easp@juntadeandalucia.es" ] "referencia" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] 3 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Dafina" "apellidos" => "Petrova" "referencia" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, Granada, Spain" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "IbS. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Granada, Spain" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Revisiones panorámicas. Otra forma de revisión de la literatura" ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0005">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In 2009, Grant and Booth identified up to 14 different types of literature reviews, from the narrative review to the most current <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">umbrella review</span><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> and stated that many of these types of reviews do not have an accurate methodology nor are they mutually exclusive. One of the most recent forms of synthesis of the literature are the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">scoping reviews</span>, which show a spectacular growth in number of publications: more than 1000 articles published in 2018 in MedLine while, in 2010, there were only 50 published. Almost 75% of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">scoping reviews</span> address health-related issues<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> and, at present, updates or methodological articles on knowledge about <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">scoping reviews</span> continue to be published, its objectives continue to be subject of debate and a standard methodology continues being sought.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3–5</span></a></p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">These publications are but the consequence and/or need to reduce uncertainty for authors and readers regarding <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">scoping reviews</span>. These can be defined as a “preliminary assessment of the volume of information available on a subject”,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> in other words, the extension, range and nature of the information about a phenomenon, although the different labels used: <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">mapping reviews</span>, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">systematic scoping review</span> or <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">scoping study</span><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> already adds to the confusion. The translation of this term into the Spanish language leads to the use of different terminologies, such as “scoping reviews”, “reviews on the scope of evidence”, “exploratory systematic reviews”, etc.; in view of the disparity, the term <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">scoping review</span> has been incorporated in the title of the articles published in Spanish. In the absence of consensus, in this article we chose to use the term “Panoramic Review” (literal translation) to refer to a Scoping Review (ScR).</p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The lack of uniformity around ScR also reaches its objectives, methodology and applicability.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> Levac collects up to 7 different definitions and objectives for ScR according to different authors.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> From “a preliminary evaluation of the potential volume and scope of the literature to be researched” to “exploratory studies that systematically identify the available literature on a subject” or “review to identify key concepts, theories and deficiencies in research”. The debates and/or inconsistencies around ScR can be summarized in the following questions. In the continuum of the literature review spectrum: Where are the ScR positioned? What are its limits? What are its fields of applicability? Can we call them exploratory reviews? Systematic? and the most recent adjective, Fast?</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">For some authors, a ScR is considered as part of a continuous review process whose ultimate goal is to perform a complete systematic review (SLR). For many others, a ScR is perceived as a method in itself, leading to the publication and dissemination of research results in a particular subject. ScR<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> are rare in Spain, most of them are published in international journals<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> and few of them address the aforementioned methodological debates. This article aims to bring readers closer to ScR, their strengths and weaknesses, mainly analysing the differences between systematic literature reviews (SLR) and ScRs. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a> summarizes those differences including the “narrative review”.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Differences in questions and/or objectives</span><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Unlike SLRs, which address “specific questions” in “specific populations”, ScR allow us to study not only “aetiologies”, “risk factors” or outcomes in the studies, but aspects related to the design, with the frameworks or theoretical models, in certain aspects of the populations, etc. It can thus raise more complex or different issues whose response goes beyond the simple consideration of what is or what is not effective.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a> The formulation of the question has a more qualitative “aspect”, a consequence of more complex and multidimensional questions, compatible with the current state of knowledge. Thus, ScR may have different objectives: to make a map of the key concepts that sustain a research area; clarify concept definitions and/or the conceptual limits of a subject; differentiate according to designs; according to methodological approaches (quantitative and/or qualitative). A ScR can focus on one or both of these objectives as a whole.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> Examples of possible ScR questions are included in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Differences in applicability</span><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Another differentiating and controversial point in relation to the ScR is the consideration that these studies are only applicable to more emerging knowledge areas versus knowledge areas with greater evidence, which should be approached with a SLR.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> In this sense, ScR could help to identify the appropriate parameters of a review (define the target population, intervention, comparison groups and/or outcomes), all known as “PICO strategy” to identify the possible volume of a SLR and the cost of it. But, depending on the objectives that are formulated, ScR can address areas with a greater wealth of literature, but very fragmented and diverse, or very focused on specific aspects. This will be the case of ScR that address the review of SLR (scoping reviews on systematic literature reviews).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12</span></a></p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">On the other hand, ScR tend to have a less clinical and more sociological approach, helping future research rather than helping with current treatments or policies, because, among other things, its methodology places little emphasis on the methodological quality of the studies.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> However, the broader approach of the information to be sought, does allow to make certain types of decisions, for example: which research area or which population should benefit from more resources.</p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Differences in methodologies</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The first methodological development proposal regarding ScR was made in 2005 by Arksey and O’Malley<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> describing 6 stages: [1] identification of research questions: generally broad; [2] identification of relevant studies: as broad as possible; [3] selection of studies: establishing inclusion/exclusion criteria; [4] mapping of data: mapping and classification of information according to the main issues and subjects; [5] collect, summarize and report the results: descriptive and/or numeric summary of the data and a thematic analysis, and [6] expert consultation exercise: optional additional step to involve key stakeholders and validate the results of the study. Subsequently, Levac<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> and the Joanna Briggs Institute<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a> made contributions to each of the stages to improve the clarity and rigour of the review process, for example: expansion of the inclusion criteria (types of participants, concepts or context), standardized data extraction, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">data charting</span> (show the results by means of graphs, according to the inclusion criteria) and implications for practice, research and/or policies.</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">ScR are more flexible in terms of methodology, since it can be reviewed during the process according to the outcomes found (e.g., according to homogeneity) and the researchers’ own criteria, and it is common to consider different types of studies (e.g., interventional, observational and qualitative in the same review). In general, these reviews allow synthesizing information from a quantitative, qualitative or mixed point of view,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> although the quantitative synthesis of the data and the evaluation of the methodological quality of the studies is more the exception than the rule.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a></p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">“Stage 6” is a specific stage of ScR that was initially considered optional but now recommended by some authors to be mandatory, although most published ScR do not include the recommended expert consultation.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Guidelines for making and publishing scoping reviews</span><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Given the existing controversies and unawareness, different guidelines have been published in recent years to prepare and publish a ScR. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a> shows a series of guidelines whose reading is recommended before starting a ScR.</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In 2011 the Cochrane Public Health Group<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> gave differentiating guidelines between an SLR and an ScR, directing the latter towards a first step in performing a SLR. The review by Pham et al. on ScR concluded that these differed not only in terms of the objective or methodologies, but also in the detail of the reports and/or articles.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> This is why the Equator network has recently published an extension of the PRISMA checklist to include ScR (PRISMA-ScR).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0165"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a> This checklist can serve as a detailed guide for researchers who plan to perform a ScR.</p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The truth is that with the publication of this checklist, it is intended that ScR can be reproduced without losing its flexibility (e.g.: the search strategy must be described, and the decisions made must be stated/justified). It also raises the possibility of incorporating a methodological quality assessment if this makes sense given the research question, which leaves the possibility of performing more powerful ScR, with more direct practice and policy implications.</p><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">However, this methodological rigour and the exhaustiveness of the report move ScR away from “fast reviews” that aim to produce immediate recommendations to inform policy makers and others involved.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0170"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> There are several methodologies in terms of fast reviews, but what they have in common is the possibility of skipping some parts of the rigorous SLR protocol in order to provide the fastest information.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> However, a ScR on an emerging issue close in time (e.g. Zika virus) may require a literature search that covers a small number of years and therefore could respond to this urgent need in a fast and rigorous way.</p><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Although it may seem otherwise, a good ScR may require more time, coordination and/or effort to complete than a SLR, because of the broader research questions and the corresponding larger number of articles that will need to be reviewed; for the need/opportunity to adapt the protocol based on the outcomes and, lastly, for having to consult with an expert panel.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">Conclusions</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">ScR can be of various types and perhaps that is why there is no clear and comprehensive definition. ScR can be more complex than SLRs since they can have different objectives and methodologies and the team's good judgement in choosing the methodology is even more relevant. Some authors believe that the amount of SLR being published is so vast, that sometimes their information is redundant<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0180"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a> and for this reason, the contribution made by the ScR to the scientific community or to other possible parties involved (policy makers, patients, etc.) should be considered.</p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Taking into account the current diversity, other better-defined subtypes of ScR may emerge in the future, thus preserving the flexibility of this methodology. A well-made and timely ScR can be the reference reading in a certain field of research for many years.</p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Authorship</span><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Isabel Ruiz-Perez proposed and designed this study. Dafina Petrova and Isabel Ruiz-Perez wrote the article and reviewed the different versions of it.</p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Conflict of interests</span><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:9 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Differences in questions and/or objectives" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Differences in applicability" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Differences in methodologies" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Guidelines for making and publishing scoping reviews" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Authorship" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Conflict of interests" ] 8 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2019-01-08" "fechaAceptado" => "2019-02-06" "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Please cite this article as: Ruiz-Perez I, Petrova D. Revisiones panorámicas. Otra forma de revisión de la literatura. Med Clin (Barc). 2019;153:165–168.</p>" ] ] "multimedia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at1" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">RS: systematic reviews; ScR: scoping reviews.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Systematic reviews \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Scoping reviews \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Narrative reviews \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Objective \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Research question \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Specific, focused on a specific effect or phenomenon \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Broad, can include multiple aspects \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">It can be specific or broad \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Possible approaches \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Describe the international evidenceIdentify and report a field of investigation on future researchConfirm if current practice is adequate/estimate the efficacy of treatments, etc.Identify and analyze conflicting outcomesAnalyze variations in the effects of interest or other heterogeneity in a systematic wayPrepare statements to guide decision making \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Identify and analyze knowledge gapsReport to a systematic reviewIdentify the types of evidence available in a field of researchClarify concepts or key definitions in the literatureAnalyze how a particular subject or field is investigated \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">It can be any of those listed for SR and ScR \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Methodology \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">A priori</span> review protocol \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Well defined and reproducible search strategy; revised by pairs \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">A priori</span> well-defined inclusion criteria \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes, but they could be generated or modified post hoc \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Standardized and detailed data extraction \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes, but it is not mandatory \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Methodological quality evaluation of the evidence \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No, but it could be done if it's relevant \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Synthesis of the data \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Quantitative in most cases \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Qualitative in most cases, but can also be quantitative if relevant \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Exclusively qualitative \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Results \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Contribution from Panel of experts and other interested parties (e.g., patients) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Direct implications for current practice \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No, in most cases \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Implications for future research \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Tools \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PRISMA guidelines to execute and report on the results of the review \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">A priori</span> registration in PROSPERO \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Yes \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No, but can pre-register in other general databases (e.g., <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Open Science Framework</span>) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Does not require pre-registration \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Cochrane educational materials \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Various books and tutorials for RS and meta-analysis: training.cochrane.org \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Specific Cochrane training for ScR: <span class="elsevierStyleInterRef" id="intr0005" href="https://training.cochrane.org/resource/scoping-reviews-what-they-are-and-how-you-can-do-them">https://training.cochrane.org/resource/scoping-reviews-what-they-are-and-how-you-can-do-them</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Not available \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2103636.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Differences between systematic reviews, scoping reviews and narrative reviews.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at2" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Examples of scoping review questions</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Sanz-Lorente M, Wanden-Berghe C, Castejón-Bolea R, Sanz-Valero J. Web 2.0 tools in the prevention of curable sexually transmitted diseases: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e113<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Cáceres-Matos R, Gil-García E, Barrientos-Trigo S, Molina E, Porcel-Gálvez AM. Consequences of chronic pain in childhood and adolescence. Gac Sanit. 2018; in press: <span class="elsevierStyleInterRef" id="intr0010" href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.11.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.11.007</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Saavedra-Mitjans M, Ferrand É, Garin N, Bussières JF. Role and impact of pharmacists in Spain: a scoping review. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018;40:1430–42<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Rafferty E, Gagnon HL, Farag M, Waldner CL. Economic evaluations of vaccines in Canada: a scoping review. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017;15:7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleVsp" style="height:0.5px"></span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Recommended readings before making a scoping review</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t"><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method. 2005;8:19–32<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Armstrong R, Hall BJ, Doyle J, Waters E. ‘Scoping the scope’ of a Cochrane review. J Pub Health. 2011;33:147–50<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Soares C, Khalil H, Parker D. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2103635.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Examples of published scoping review questions and a short list of the most important readings before performing a scoping review.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0015" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:18 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "M.J. Grant" 1 => "A. Booth" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Health Info Libr J" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "26" "paginaInicial" => "91" "paginaFinal" => "108" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19490148" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.T. Pham" 1 => "A. Rajić" 2 => "J.D. Greig" 3 => "J.M. Sargeant" 4 => "A. Papadopoulos" 5 => "S.A. McEwen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/jrsm.1123" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Res Synth Methods" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "371" "paginaFinal" => "385" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26052958" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0105" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.C. Tricco" 1 => "W. Zarin" 2 => "M. Ghassemi" 3 => "V. Nincic" 4 => "E. Lillie" 5 => "M.J. Page" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.014" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Clin Epidemiol" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "96" "paginaInicial" => "133" "paginaFinal" => "142" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29103958" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0110" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "Z. Munn" 1 => "M.D.J. Peters" 2 => "C. Stern" 3 => "C. Tufanaru" 4 => "A. McArthur" 5 => "E. Aromataris" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "BMC Med Res Methodol" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "18" "paginaInicial" => "143" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30453902" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0115" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "L. Strifler" 1 => "R. Cardoso" 2 => "J. McGowan" 3 => "E. Cogo" 4 => "V. Nincic" 5 => "P.A. Khan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.04.008" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Clin Epidemiol" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "100" "paginaInicial" => "92" "paginaFinal" => "102" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29660481" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0120" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Opening-up the definition of systematic literature review: the plurality of worldviews, methodologies and methods for reviews and syntheses" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "P. Pluye" 1 => "Q.N. Hong" 2 => "P.L. Bush" 3 => "I. Vedel" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.033" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Clin Epidemiol" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "73" "paginaInicial" => "2" "paginaFinal" => "5" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26898706" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0125" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.C. Tricco" 1 => "E. Lillie" 2 => "W. Zarin" 3 => "K. O’Brien" 4 => "H. Colquhoun" 5 => "M. Kastner" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "BMC Med Res Methodol" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "16" "paginaInicial" => "15" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26857112" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0130" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Scoping studies: advancing the methodology" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D. Levac" 1 => "H. Colquhoun" 2 => "K.K. O’Brien" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/1748-5908-5-69" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Implement Sci" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "69" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20854677" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0135" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Intersectorality and social participation as coping policies for health inequities-worldwide" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "R.C. Fiorati" 1 => "R.A. Arcêncio" 2 => "J. Segura del Pozo" 3 => "M. Ramasco-Gutiérrez" 4 => "P. Serrano-Gallardo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Gac Sanit" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "32" "paginaInicial" => "304" "paginaFinal" => "314" ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0140" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Impact, economic evaluation, and sustainability of integrated vector management in urban settings to prevent vector-borne diseases: a scoping review" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J. Marcos-Marcos" 1 => "A. Olry de Labry-Lima" 2 => "S. Toro-Cardenas" 3 => "M. Lacasaña" 4 => "S. Degroote" 5 => "V. Ridde" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/s40249-018-0464-x" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Infect Dis Poverty" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "7" "paginaInicial" => "83" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30173675" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0145" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Reviewers’ manual 2015. Methodology for JBI scoping reviews" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "The Joanna Briggs Institute" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:3 [ "fecha" => "2015" "editorial" => "The Joanna Briggs Institute" "editorialLocalizacion" => "Adelaide" ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0150" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Lorenc" 1 => "G. Feder" 2 => "H. MacPherson" 3 => "P. Little" 4 => "S.W. Mercer" 5 => "D. Sharp" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020222" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "BMJ Open" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "8" "paginaInicial" => "e020222" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327397" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "H. Arksey" 1 => "L. O’Malley" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int J Soc Res Methodol" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "8" "paginaInicial" => "19" "paginaFinal" => "32" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "‘Scoping the scope’ of a Cochrane review" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "R. Armstrong" 1 => "B.J. Hall" 2 => "J. Doyle" 3 => "E. Waters" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Public Health" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "33" "paginaInicial" => "147" "paginaFinal" => "150" ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0165" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.C. Tricco" 1 => "E. Lillie" 2 => "W. Zarin" 3 => "K.K. O’Brien" 4 => "H. Colquhoun" 5 => "D. Levac" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.7326/M18-0850" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Intern Med" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "169" "paginaInicial" => "467" "paginaFinal" => "473" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30178033" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0170" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A scoping review of rapid review methods" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.C. Tricco" 1 => "J. Antony" 2 => "W. Zarin" 3 => "L. Strifler" 4 => "M. Ghassemi" 5 => "J. Ivory" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "BMC Med" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "13" "paginaInicial" => "224" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26377409" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "S. Khangura" 1 => "K. Konnyu" 2 => "R. Cushman" 3 => "J. Grimshaw" 4 => "D. Moher" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/2046-4053-1-10" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Syst Rev" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "10" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587960" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0180" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta analyses" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "J.P. Ioannidis" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/1468-0009.12210" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Milbank Q" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "94" "paginaInicial" => "485" "paginaFinal" => "514" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27620683" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/23870206/0000015300000004/v1_201908170832/S2387020619303122/v1_201908170832/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "44145" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Special article" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/23870206/0000015300000004/v1_201908170832/S2387020619303122/v1_201908170832/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2387020619303122?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2023 March | 2 | 2 | 4 |