Buscar en
Revista Iberoamericana de Micología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Iberoamericana de Micología Candida norvegensis fungemia in a liver transplant recipient
Información de la revista
Vol. 32. Núm. 2.
Páginas 115-117 (Abril - Junio 2015)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
4168
Vol. 32. Núm. 2.
Páginas 115-117 (Abril - Junio 2015)
Note
Acceso a texto completo
Candida norvegensis fungemia in a liver transplant recipient
Fungemia por Candida norvegensis en un receptor de trasplante hepático
Visitas
4168
Gemma Sanclementea, Francesc Marcob, Carlos Cerveraa, Irma Hoyoa, Jordi Colmeneroc, Cristina Pitartb, Manuel Almelab, Miquel Navasac, Asunción Morenoa,
Autor para correspondencia
amoreno@clinic.ub.es

Corresponding author.
a Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain
b Department of Microbiology, “Centre Diagnòstic Biomèdic” (CDB), Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain
c Department of Hepatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Abstract
Background

The incidence of candidemia due to non-Candida albicans Candida species has been progressively increasing in recent years. The use of fluconazole as antifungal prophylaxis has been described as a risk factor for the development of infections by fluconazole resistant Candida strains. We report a case of Candida norvegensis bloodstream infection in a liver transplant recipient.

Case report

A 61-year-old man, who received a third liver allograft and became worse with the onset of ischemic cholangiopathy and recurrent episodes of cholangitis, was admitted to our hospital due to the development of intra-abdominal abscesses. He received multiple antibiotic schemes, and after 3 months he was discharged, maintaining parenteral antibiotic at home. While he was on fluconazole prophylaxis, a breakthrough candidemia due to C. norvegensis occurred. In vitro susceptibilities of the isolate to several antifungal agents were as follows: amphotericin B MIC 0.5mg/l, flucytosine 64mg/l, fluconazole 64mg/l, itraconazole 4mg/l, voriconazole 0.75mg/l, and caspofungin 0.047mg/l. He was treated with anidulafungin with resolution of candidemia.

Conclusions

The use of fluconazole for antifungal prophylaxis may lead to the emergence of fluconazole-resistant Candida infections, with C. norvegensis being a possible emerging pathogen in organ transplant recipients.

Keywords:
Candida norvegensis
Fungemia
Liver transplant
Fluconazole
Resumen
Antecedentes

En los últimos años ha aumentado la incidencia de candidemia causada por especies del género Candida distintas de Candida albicans. Se ha descrito el uso de profilaxis antifúngica con fluconazol como factor de riesgo para el desarrollo de infecciones por cepas de Candida resistentes a este antifúngico. Se describe un caso de fungemia por Candida norvegensis en un receptor de un trasplante hepático.

Caso clínico

Un varón de 61 años, receptor de un tercer trasplante hepático que se complica con una colangiopatía isquémica y episodios de colangitis de repetición, ingresó en nuestro hospital por presentar abscesos intraabdominales. Recibió múltiples esquemas antibióticos y, tras 3 meses de ingreso, se dio de alta manteniendo un tratamiento antibiótico parenteral en domicilio. Mientras recibía profilaxis con fluconazol, desarrolló una candidemia de brecha por C. norvegensis. Los valores de CMI in vitro del aislamiento para algunos antifúngicos fueron los siguientes: anfotericina B 0,5mg/l, flucitosina 64mg/l, fluconazol 64mg/l, itraconazol 4mg/l, voriconazol 0,75mg/l y caspofungina 0,047mg/l. El paciente recibió tratamiento con anidulafungina, con resolución de la candidemia.

Conclusiones

El uso de fluconazol como profilaxis antifúngica puede conllevar la aparición de infecciones por especies de Candida resistentes a este antifúngico, siendo C. norvegensis un posible patógeno emergente en pacientes receptores de un órgano sólido.

Palabras clave:
Candida norvegensis
Fungemia
Trasplante hepático
Fluconazol
Texto completo

Candida is the leading cause of invasive fungal infection in organ transplant recipients.20 The main risk factors for invasive candidiasis in liver transplant recipients are previous use of broad spectrum antibiotics, the need of post-transplant dialysis and retransplantation.27 Recent studies show a trend toward an increasing incidence of infections caused by non-Candida albicans Candida species, and this seems to be related to the use of prophylaxis with fluconazole.13Candida norvegensis is an unusual pathogen, with high rates of fluconazole resistance, and it has been described as a potential pathogen in immunocompromised patients. Herein, we describe a case of C. norvegensis fungemia in a liver transplant patient under fluconazole prophylaxis successfully treated with anidulafungin.

Case report

In June 2008, a 61-year-old man underwent liver transplantation because of an end-stage liver disease caused by hepatitis C and B viruses coinfection and hepatocellular carcinoma. During the surgical procedure, hepatic artery thrombosis was found but it was not possible to completely recanalize the artery. Immunosuppressive scheme included tacrolimus, mofetil mycophenolate and prednisone. In February 2009 he was diagnosed with ischemic cholangiopathy. An arteriography did not show additional vascular complications. Since diagnosis the patient presented recurrent episodes of acute cholangitis. In April 2009, a hepaticojejunostomy was performed, but cholestasis persisted. Two months later the patient underwent a second liver transplantation. The postoperative course was complicated with surgical site bleeding, requiring liver packing and multiple blood transfusions. Because of the primary graft dysfunction, the patient received a third liver transplantation 7 days later. During the surgical procedure he developed hepatic artery thrombosis. In the post-transplant period he presented multiple episodes of acute cholangitis secondary to ischemic cholangiopathy.

In November 2009 he was admitted to the hospital because of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecium cholangitis. Initial treatment included meropenem, vancomycin, amikacin and prophylactic fluconazole (at a dose of 100mg/d). During admission he developed multiple liver abscesses that required percutaneous drainage. Several blood cultures grew multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. faecium, Enterococcus faecalis and extended-spectrum betalactamase producing E. coli. He received multiple antibiotic regimens depending on the susceptibilities of the isolates (including vancomycin, ceftazidime, amikacin, metronidazole, fosfomycin, colistin, doripenem, meropenem, ampicillin, teicoplanin and piperacillin/tazobactam). In February 2010, as liver abscesses persisted, he was proposed to receive prolonged treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin in our outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program. As broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy was administered, prophylactic fluconazole was maintained during outpatient antibiotic treatment.

Two weeks after hospital discharge, the fever reappeared and breakthrough candidemia due to C. norvegensis was diagnosed. Blood cultures were processed by the BACTEC 9240 system (Becton-Dickinson, MD, USA). The method used for the identification of the Candida strain was MALDI-TOF MS.16,25 The patient was hemodynamically stable and with good general status. Intravenous anidulafungin treatment (200mg loading dose and thereafter 100mg/d) was started in the first 36h after the extraction of blood cultures and the patient was not readmitted to hospital. In vitro susceptibilities of the isolate to several antifungal agents, determined by CLSI microdilution method, were as follows: amphotericin B MIC 0.5mg/l, flucytosine 64mg/l, fluconazole 64mg/l, itraconazole 4mg/l; voriconazole 0.75mg/l and caspofungin 0.047mg/l, so the treatment with anidulafungin was maintained. The patient became afebrile and blood cultures performed 48h after starting the antifungal treatment were negative. Anidulafungin was maintained for 14 days. After the resolution of candidemia the patient developed progressive ascites and peripheral edema and was readmitted to the hospital. Persistence of liver abscess was seen on abdominal ultrasonogram. Blood cultures were negative. Despite intravenous antibiotics, the patient's general condition worsened. He died 40 days after hospital admission due to end-stage liver disease and multiorgan failure.

Discussion

Candida is an increasing cause of bloodstream infections, being the fourth microorganism to be isolated frequently in blood cultures in the United States29 and the seventh cause of nosocomial infection in our center.19 The increasing risk of invasive candidiasis may be explained by a rise in the use of invasive procedures, intravenous catheters, total parenteral nutrition and broad spectrum antibiotics.12 Although C. albicans is the most common single species identified, the incidence of non-C. albicans candidemia has been progressively increasing.12,19

Solid organ transplant recipients are at risk to develop invasive fungal infection due to a combination of aggressive surgery and requirement of immunosuppressive therapy. The incidence of fungal infection varies depending on the transplanted organ, being highest in small bowel transplantation (40–59%) and lowest in renal recipients (1–14%).9,20 Invasive candidiasis in organ transplant recipients is associated with candidemia in more than half of the episodes.20 In our country, candidemia represents 8% of all cases of bloodstream infections in organ transplant recipients,17 with 46% of them caused by species with potential fluconazole resistance (Candida krusei and Candida glabrata).

C. norvegensis was first isolated in Norway from the sputum of three patients with asthma in 1954.6 The first described clinically relevant infection by this pathogen was in a renal transplant recipient who developed C. norvegensis peritonitis associated with the use of peritoneal dialysis.18 Since then, scarce cases of C. norvegensis infections have been described, most of them in patients with malignancies or HIV infection.11,14,26 A recent study reported that the rate of isolation of C. norvegensis has increased by 5–10-folds during the last 10 years.24 In the same study the susceptibility of C. norvegensis to fluconazole and voriconazole was tested, with 41% of the isolates being resistant to fluconazole and 91.5% susceptible to voriconazole, although an increased percentage of voriconazole-resistant strains has been observed during the last years. Although the level of evidence is very low due to infrequent descriptions of infection in humans, amphotericin B has been considered the treatment of choice for C. norvegensis infections.15 However, the associated toxicity of amphotericin B could limit its use in solid organ transplant recipients. Several studies have demonstrated susceptibility of C. norvegensis to echinocandins.2,5,28 Although our patient died due to end-stage liver disease and other complications, C. norvegensis fungemia was successfully cleared with intravenous anidulafungin. In our patient, the in vitro susceptibility of C. norvegensis to echinocandins was tested only for caspofungin. When yeasts were isolated in blood cultures, and before having an identification of the species, a treatment with anidulafungin was prescribed because the patient was receiving fluconazole as prophylaxis. Although antifungal in vitro tests were not performed to establish the MIC value to anidulafungin, as the patient was doing well under this therapeutic regimen we maintained the same treatment. Previous reports have described that all three echinocandins have similar MICs against the majority of Candida species.8,23 However, the MIC correlation between the three echinocandins has not been studied in C. norvegensis. In addition to the good response to treatment, we decided to maintain anidulafungin because while caspofungin decreases the concentration of tacrolimus, anidulafungin and micafungin have fewer interactions with immunosuppressants.8

Non-C. albicans candidal infections represent an emerging problem in immunosuppressed patients in general and in organ transplant recipients in particular. The broad use of fluconazole for antifungal prophylaxis may lead to an increase in fluconazole-resistant Candida infections,17 with C. norvegensis as a possible emerging pathogen in organ transplant recipients. In the case we report, the patient received fluconazole as prophylaxis due to the multiple history of abdominal surgery, the need for a central venous catheter, and the use of broad spectrum antibiotics during a long period of time, all of them being risk factors for the development of candidemia.3 There are some studies that have analyzed the efficacy of fluconazole prophylaxis in patients at high risk for invasive candidiasis, especially surgical and critically ill patients. The majority of them used a dose of 400mg per day, but one study describes a reduction of invasive fungal infections using a dose of 100mg per day.1,7,10,22 There are no studies comparing different doses of fluconazole for prophylaxis. European guidelines currently recommend the dose of 400mg/day for prophylaxis in non-neutropenic adults.4 For antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant patients at high risk of invasive candidiasis, the IDSA guidelines recommend fluconazole at a dose between 200 and 400mg.21 However, the interaction of fluconazole with calcineurin inhibitors limits the safety of high-dose fluconazole prophylaxis in this subgroup of patients.

In conclusion, C. norvegensis must be taken into account as a possible emergent pathogen in organ transplant patients receiving prophylaxis with fluconazole.

Conflict of interest

Nothing to declare.

References
[1]
A.Z. Ables, N.A. Blumer, G.T. Valainis, M.T. Godenick, D.K. Kajdasz, Y.Y. Palesch.
Fluconazole prophylaxis of severe Candida infection in trauma and postsurgical patients: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Inf Dis Clin Prac, 9 (2000), pp. 169-175
[2]
S. Arikan, B. Sancak, G. Hascelik.
In vitro activity of caspofungin compared to amphotericin B, fluconazole and itraconazole against Candida strains isolated in a Turkish University Hospital.
Med Mycol, 43 (2005), pp. 171-178
[3]
H.M. Blumberg, W.R. Jarvis, J.M. Soucie, J.E. Edwards, J.E. Patterson, M.A. Pfaller, et al.
Risk factors for candidal bloodstream infections in surgical intensive care unit patients: the NEMIS prospective multicenter study.
Clin Infect Dis, 33 (2001), pp. 177-266
[4]
O.A. Cornely, M. Bassetti, T. Calandra, J. Garbino, B.J. Kullberg, O. Lortholary, for the ESCMID Fungal Infection Study Group (EFISG), et al.
ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients.
Clin Microbiol Infect, 18 (2012), pp. 19-37
[5]
M. Cuenca-Estrella, A. Gomez-Lopez, E. Mellado, A. Monzon, M.J. Buitrago, J.L. Rodriguez-Tudela.
Activity profile in vitro of micafungin against Spanish clinical isolates of common and emerging species of yeasts and molds.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 53 (2009), pp. 2192-2195
[6]
E. Dietrichson.
Study of a Norwegian collection of yeasts.
Ann Parasitol Hum Comp, 29 (1954), pp. 460-498
[7]
P. Eggimann, P. Francioli, J. Bille, R. Schneider, M. Wu, G. Chapuis, et al.
Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents intra-abdominal candidiasis in high-risk surgical patients.
Crit Care Med, 27 (1999), pp. 1066-1072
[8]
G. Eschenauer, D.D. DePestel, P.L. Carver.
Comparison of echinocandin antifungals.
Ther Clin Risk Manag, 3 (2007), pp. 71-97
[9]
S. Gabardi, D.W. Kubiak, A.K. Chandraker, S.G. Tullius.
Invasive fungal infections and antifungal therapies in solid organ transplant recipients.
Transpl Int, 20 (2007), pp. 993-1015
[10]
J. Garbino, D.P. Lew, J.A. Romand, S. Hugonnet, R. Auckenthaler, D. Pittet.
Prevention of severe Candida infections in nonneutropenic, high-risk, critically ill patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial in patients treated by selective digestive decontamination.
Intensive Care Med, 28 (2002), pp. 1708-1717
[11]
S.V. Hood, C.B. Moore, D.W. Denning.
Isolation of Candida norvegensis from clinical specimens: four case reports.
Clin Infect Dis, 23 (1996), pp. 1185-1187
[12]
D.L. Horn, D. Neofytos, E.J. Anaissie, J.A. Fishman, W.J. Steinbach, A.J. Olyaei, et al.
Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 2019 patients: data from the prospective antifungal therapy alliance registry.
Clin Infect Dis, 48 (2009), pp. 1695-1703
[13]
S. Husain, J. Tollemar, E.A. Dominguez, K. Baumgarten, A. Humar, D.L. Paterson, et al.
Changes in the spectrum and risk factors for invasive candidiasis in liver transplant recipients: prospective, multicenter, case-controlled study.
Transplantation, 75 (2003), pp. 2023-2029
[14]
N. Kiraz, O.M. Akay, Y. Sen, V. Aslan, Y. Akgun, Z. Gulbas.
Candida norvegensis fungaemia in a neutropenic patient with acute non-lymphoblastic leukaemia.
[15]
V. Krcmery, A.J. Barnes.
Non-albicans Candida spp. causing fungaemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance.
J Hosp Infect, 50 (2002), pp. 243-260
[16]
C. Lacroix, A. Gicquel, B. Sendid, J. Meyer, I. Accoceberry, N. François, et al.
Evaluation of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems for the identification of Candida species.
Clin Microbiol Infect, (2013),
[17]
A. Moreno, C. Cervera, J. Gavaldá, M. Rovira, R. de la Cámara, I. Jarque, et al.
Bloodstream infections among transplant recipients: results of a nationwide surveillance in Spain.
Am J Transplant, 7 (2007), pp. 2579-2586
[18]
H. Nielsen, J. Stenderup, B. Bruun, J. Ladefoged.
Candida norvegensis peritonitis and invasive disease in a patient on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
J Clin Microbiol, 28 (1990), pp. 1664-1665
[19]
M. Ortega, F. Marco, A. Soriano, M. Almela, J.A. Martínez, J. López, et al.
Candida species bloodstream infection: epidemiology and outcome in a single institution from 1991 to 2008.
J Hosp Infect, 77 (2011), pp. 157-161
[20]
P.G. Pappas, B.D. Alexander, D.R. Andes, S. Hadley, C.A. Kauffman, A. Freifeld, et al.
Invasive fungal infections among organ transplant recipients: results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) Database.
Clin Infect Dis, 50 (2010), pp. 1101-1111
[21]
P.G. Pappas, C.A. Kauffman, D. Andes, D.K. Benjamin, T.F. Calandra, J.E. Edwards, et al.
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Clin Infect Dis, 48 (2009), pp. 503-535
[22]
R.K. Pelz, C.W. Hendrix, S.M. Swoboda, M. Diener-West, W.G. Merz, J. Hammond, et al.
Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of fluconazole to prevent candidal infections in critically ill surgical patients.
Ann Surg, 233 (2001), pp. 542-548
[23]
M.A. Pfaller, L. Boyken, R.J. Hollis, J. Kroeger, S.A. Messer, S. Tendolkar, et al.
In vitro susceptibility of invasive isolates of Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin: six years of global surveillance.
J Clin Microbiol, 46 (2008), pp. 150-156
[24]
M.A. Pfaller, D.J. Diekema, D.L. Gibbs, V.A. Newell, D. Ellis, V. Tullio, et al.
Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2007: a 10.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida species to fluconazole and voriconazole as determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion.
J Clin Microbiol, 48 (2010), pp. 1366-1377
[25]
G. Pulcrano, D.V. Iula, A. Vollaro, A. Tucci, M. Cerullo, M. Esposito, et al.
Rapid and reliable MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry identification of Candida non-albicans isolates from bloodstream infections.
J Microbiol Methods, 94 (2013), pp. 262-266
[26]
P. Sandven, K. Nilsen, A. Digranes, T. Yjade, J. Lassen.
Candida norvegensis: a fluconazole-resistant species.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 41 (1997), pp. 1375-1376
[27]
F.P. Silveira, S. Husain.
Fungal infections in solid organ transplantation.
Med Mycol, 45 (2007), pp. 305-320
[28]
T. Sugita, K. Takeo, M. Ohkusu, E. Virtudazo, M. Takashima, E. Asako, et al.
Fluconazole-resistant pathogens Candida inconspicua and C. norvegensis: DNA sequence diversity of the rRNA intergenic spacer region, antifungal drug susceptibility, and extracellular enzyme production.
Microbiol Immunol, 48 (2004), pp. 761-766
[29]
H. Wisplinghoff, T. Bischoff, S.M. Tallent, H. Seifert, R.P. Wenzel, M.B. Edmond.
Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study.
Clin Infect Dis, 39 (2004), pp. 309-317
Copyright © 2013. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.riam.2023.06.001
No mostrar más