Información del artículo
Artículo
Opciones para acceder a los textos completos de la publicación Medicina Clínica
Suscriptor
Comprar
Contactar
Teléfono para suscripciones e incidencias
De lunes a viernes de 9h a 18h (GMT+1) excepto los meses de julio y agosto que será de 9 a 15h
Llamadas desde España
932 415 960
Llamadas desde fuera de España
+34 932 415 960
E-mail
Bibliografía
[1]
S.Y. Guraya, R.I. Norman, K.I. Khoshhal, S.S. Guraya, A. Forgione.
Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies.
Pak J Med Sci, 32 (2016), pp. 1562-1567
[2]
M. Pulido Mestre.
Reflexiones sobre la autoría de las publicaciones científicas.
Educiones Gráficas Rey, S.L, (2018),
[3]
D.G. Katritsis.
Journal impact factor: Widely used, misused and abused.
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev, 8 (2019), pp. 153-155
[4]
J. Neuberger, C. Counsell.
Impact factors: uses and abuses.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 14 (2002), pp. 209-211
[5]
C.K. Ranjan.
Bibliometric indices of scientific journals: Time to overcome the obsession and think beyond the impact factor.
Med J Armed Forces India, 73 (2017), pp. 175-177
[6]
R. Phogat, B.C. Manjunath, B. Sabbarwal, A. Bhatnagar, Reena, D. Anand.
Misconduct in biomedical research: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 13 (2023), pp. 185-193
[7]
M.A. Deshmukh, A.S. Dodamani, M.R. Khairnar, R.G. Naik.
Research misconduct: A neglected plague.
Indian J Public Health, 61 (2017), pp. 33-36
[8]
S.L. George.
Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: Prevalence and causal factors.
Int J Clin Oncol, 21 (2016), pp. 15-21
[9]
T.J. Liesegang.
The continued movement for open access to peer-reviewed literature.
Am J Ophthalmol, 156 (2013), pp. 423-432
[10]
S.A. Elmore, E.H. Weston.
Predatory journals: What they are and how to avoid them.
Toxicol Pathol, 48 (2020), pp. 607-610
[11]
R. Hackett, S. Kelly.
The continuing challenge of paper-mills to publishing in the biological sciences.
Biol Open, 11 (2022), pp. bio059428
[12]
J. Christopher.
The raw truth about paper mills.
FEBS Lett, 595 (2021), pp. 1751-1757
[13]
J. Christopher.
Systematic fabrication of scientific images revealed.
FEBS Lett, 592 (2018), pp. 3027-3029
[14]
J.A. Byrne, J. Christopher.
Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century-how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?.
FEBS Lett, 594 (2020), pp. 583-589
[15]
S. Heck, F. Bianchini, N.Y. Souren, C. Wilhelm, Y. Ohl, C. Plass.
Fake data, paper mills, and their authors: The International Journal of Cancer reacts to this threat to scientific integrity.
Int J Cancer, 149 (2021), pp. 492-493
[16]
I. Pérez-Neri, C. Pineda, H. Sandoval.
Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: A rapid scoping review.
Clin Rheumatol, 41 (2022), pp. 2241-2248
[17]
C. Candal-Pedreira, J.S. Ross, A. Ruano-Ravina, D.S. Egilman, E. Fernández, M. Pérez-Ríos.
Retracted papers originating from paper mills: Cross sectional study.
BMJ, 379 (2022), pp. e071517
[18]
Day A. Searching for misconduct and paper mills in peer review comments. 9th International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication. [accessed 11 Feb 2024] Available from: https://peerreviewcongress.org/abstract/searching-for-misconduct-and-paper-mills-in-peer-review-comments/
[19]
COPE & STM. Paper Mills - Research report from COPE & STM - English. ht&&tps://doi.org/10.24318/jtbG8IHL©2022 Committee on Publication Ethics (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Version 1: June 2022 [accessed 11 Feb 2024] Available from: https://publicationethics.org/sites/default/files/paper-mills-cope-stm-research-report.pdf
