metricas

Medicina Clínica

Sugerencias
Medicina Clínica Patient and public involvement in registered non-pharmacological non-commercial ...
Información de la revista
Cita
Cita
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Special article

Patient and public involvement in registered non-pharmacological non-commercial Spanish trials completed in 2009–2024: A systematic review

Participación de la ciudadanía en ensayos registrados no farmacológicos no comerciales españoles y completados en 2009-2024: revisión sistemática
Visitas
596
Rafael Dal-Réa,
Autor para correspondencia
rafael.dalre@quironsalud.es

Corresponding author.
, Elena García-Méndezb
a Epidemiology Unit, Health Research Institute-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
b Technical Secretariat, Research Ethics Committee (CEIm), La Paz University Hospital, Health Research Institute La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas

Artículo

Opciones para acceder a los textos completos de la publicación Medicina Clínica
Suscriptor
Suscriptor de la revista

Si ya tiene sus datos de acceso, clique aquí.

Si olvidó su clave de acceso puede recuperarla clicando aquí y seleccionando la opción "He olvidado mi contraseña".
Comprar
Comprar acceso al artículo

Comprando el artículo el PDF del mismo podrá ser descargado

Comprar ahora
Contactar
Teléfono para suscripciones e incidencias
De lunes a viernes de 9h a 18h (GMT+1) excepto los meses de julio y agosto que será de 9 a 15h
Llamadas desde España
932 415 960
Llamadas desde fuera de España
+34 932 415 960
E-mail
References
[1]
B. Hanley, A. Truesdale, A. King, D. Elbourne, I. Chalmers.
Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey.
[2]
S. Staniszewska.
Patient and public involvement in health services and health research: a brief overview of evidence, policy and activity.
J Res Nurs, 14 (2009), pp. 295-298
[3]
M.J. Goldfarb, C. Bechtel, Q. Capers IV, A. Velasco, J.A. Dodson, J.L. Jackson, et al.
Engaging families in adult cardiovascular care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
J Am Heart Assoc, 11 (2022), pp. e025859
[4]
Increasing patient, public involvement in clinical research.
Lancet Health Long, 5 (2024), pp. e83
[5]
K.L. Shaw, M.J. Calvert, P. Borrow, E. Chakera, R. Chakraverty, S.E. Hughes, et al.
Integrating patient and public involvement and engagement in translational medicine.
[6]
National Institute for Health Research. Resources and training for public involvement. Available from: https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/.
[7]
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Available from: https://www.pcori.org/.
[8]
M.S.Y. Biddle, A. Gibson, D. Evans.
Attitudes and approaches to patient and public involvement across Europe: a systematic review.
Health Soc Care Comm, 29 (2021), pp. 18-27
[9]
J.P. Domecq, G. Prutsky, T. Elraiyah, Z. Wang, M. Nabhan, N. Shippe, et al.
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.
BMC Health Serv Res, 14 (2014), pp. 89
[10]
N. Benizri, S. Hallot, K. Burns, M. Goldfarb.
Patient and family representation in randomized clinical trials published in 3 medical and surgical journals. A systematic review.
JAMA Netw Open, 5 (2022), pp. e2230858
[11]
C. De Angelis, J.M. Drazen, F.A. Frizelle, C. Haug, J. Hoey, R. Horton, et al.
Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
[12]
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki.
Ethical principles for medial research involving human participants. Helsinki, (2024),
[13]
World Health Organization. ICTRP. Trial registration. Available from: https://www.who.int/clinical-trials-registry-platform/network/trial-registration.
[14]
R. Dal-Ré, R. Banzi, I.A. Cristea, C. Fernández-de-las-Casas, L.G. Hemkens, P. Janiaud, et al.
Using the phases of clinical development of medicines to describe clinical trials assessing other interventions is widespread but not useful.
J Clin Epidemiol, 161 (2023), pp. 157-163
[15]
H.P. Soares, S. Daniels, A. Kumar, M. Clarke, C. Scott, S. Swann, et al.
Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.
[16]
K.E. Dengso, S.T. Lindholm, S.F. Herling, M. Pedersen, K.H. Norskov, M.O. Collet, et al.
Patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research: a scoping review of contemporary practice.
Res Involv Engagem, 9 (2023), pp. 72
[17]
L.P. Forsythe, K.L. Carman, V. Szydlowski, L. Fayish, L. Davidson, D.H. Hickman, et al.
Patient engagement in research: early findings from the patient-centered outcomes research institute.
Health Aff (Millwood), 3 (2019), pp. 359-367
[18]
M. Husson, A. Dechartres, B. Ramjdee, M. Diverres, T. Zejli, M. L’Henaff, et al.
Patient and public involvement is suboptimal in randomized controlled trials addressing a chronic condition.
J Clin Epidemiol, 160 (2023), pp. 71-82
[19]
I. Lang, A. King, G. Jenkins, K. Boddy, Z. Khan, K. Liabo.
How common is patient and public involvement (PPI)? Cross-sectional analysis of frequency of PPI reporting in health research papers and associations with methods, funding sources and other factors.
BMJ Open, 12 (2022), pp. e063356
[20]
S. Estrup, E. Baror, C.B. Mortensen, C.T. Anthon, E. Crescioli, M.B.N. Kjaer, et al.
Patient and public involvement in contemporary large intensive care trials: A meta-epidemiological study.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 67 (2023), pp. 256-264
[21]
S.G. Nicholls, A.A. Al-Jaishi, H. Niznick, K. Carroll, M.T. Madani, K.D. Peak, et al.
Health equity considerations in pragmatic trials in Alzheimer's and dementia disease: results from a methodological review.
Alzheimer's Dement, 15 (2023), pp. e12392
[22]
T.M. Zirnsak, A.H. Ng, C. Brasier, R. Gray.
Public involvement in Australian clinical trials: a systematic review.
Clin Trials, 21 (2024), pp. 507-515
[23]
A.W. Karlsson, A.K. Sorensen, K. Borgesen, K.E. Behrens, T. Andersen, M.L. Kidholm, et al.
Roles, outcomes, and enablers within research partnerships: a rapid review of the literature on patient and public involvement and engagement in health research.
Res Involv Engagem, 9 (2023), pp. 43
[24]
G. Fox, M.M. Lalu, T. Sabloff, S.G. Nicholls, M. Smith, D. Stacey, et al.
Recognizing patient partner contributions to health research: a systematic review of reported practices.
Res Involv Engagem, 9 (2023), pp. 80
[25]
S.M. Vanderhout, M. Bhalla, A. Van, D.A. Fergusson, B.K. Potter, A. Karoly, et al.
The impact of patient and family engagement in child health research: a scoping review.
J Pediatr, 253 (2023), pp. 115-128
[26]
A.W. Chan, I. Boutron, S. Hopewell, D. Moher, K.F. Schulz, G.S. Collins, et al.
SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomized trials.
[27]
S. Hopewell, A.-W. Chan, G.S. Collins, A. Hróbjartsson, D. Moher, K.F. Schulz, et al.
CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials.
[28]
R. Dal-Ré, E. García-Méndez, I. Mahillo-Fernández.
Features and results availability of non-commercial Spanish COVID-19 trials: a systematic review of clinical trial registers and corresponding literature.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 81 (2025), pp. 429-439
[29]
E. Doble, S. Walker, A. Price, K. Abbasi.
More medical journals must work in partnership with patients and the public.
BMJ, 386 (2024), pp. q1463
[30]
J. Brennan, M.T.C. Poon, E. Christopher, O. Fulton, C. Porteous, P. Brennan.
Reporting of PPI and the MCID in phase III/IV randomised controlled trials—a systematic review.
[31]
O. Zvonareva, C. Cravet, D.P. Richards.
Practices of patient engagement in drug development: a systematic scoping review.
Res Involv Engagem, 8 (2022), pp. 29
[32]
M. Mavris, A.F. Helms, N. Bere.
Engaging patients in medicines regulation: a tale of two agencies.
Nat Rev Drug Discov, 18 (2019), pp. 885-886
asdasdasd
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
Material suplementario