Regístrese
Buscar en
Enfermería Clínica
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermería Clínica Supportive care needs and quality of life of patients with gynecological cancer ...
Información de la revista
Vol. 28. Núm. S1.
1st International Nursing Scholars Congress. Depok (Indonesia), 15-16 November 2016
Páginas 222-226 (Febrero - Junio 2018)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
511
Vol. 28. Núm. S1.
1st International Nursing Scholars Congress. Depok (Indonesia), 15-16 November 2016
Páginas 222-226 (Febrero - Junio 2018)
DOI: 10.1016/S1130-8621(18)30072-X
Acceso a texto completo
Supportive care needs and quality of life of patients with gynecological cancer undergoing therapy
Visitas
...
Riska Hediya Putria, Yati Afiyantib,
Autor para correspondencia
yatikris@ui.ac.id

Corresponding author.
, Titin Ungsianikb, Ariesta Milantib
a STIKes Aisyah Pringsewu Lampung, Indonesia
b Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (3)
Table 1. Characteristics of the respondents (n=153).
Table 2. Unmet supportive care needs (n=153).
Table 3. Relationship between the need for supportive services and quality of life (n=153).
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract
Objective

To identify the relationship of unmet supportive care needs with quality of life of patients with gynecological cancer undergoing therapy.

Method

This study used a cross-sectional design. A total of 153 patients with gynecological cancer undergoing therapy were recruited using consecutive sampling methods. The participants completed the questionnaire of Supportive Care Needs Survey to identify their supportive care needs, EORTC-QLQ 30 to assess their general quality of life, and EORTC-QLQ-CX 24 or - OV 28 to determine cancer-specific quality of life in cervical cancer and ovarian cancer, respectively.

Results

Most of the participants (96.1%) reported their unmet needs of supportive care predominantly in the physical domain (80.4%). Unmet supportive care needs were found to be statistically significantly related to quality of life in the global health, functional, and symptom domains (p value 1=0.003, p value 2=<0.001, and p value 3= 0.001; r1=-0.235, r2=0.306, and r3=0.268, respectively).

Conclusions

Patients with gynecological cancer needs various supportive care during treatment. These supportive care needs should be identified early at the time of diagnosis and continued throughout the disease and treatment trajectory to the survivorship point. Otherwise, unmet supportive care needs may lead to a low quality of life.

Keywords:
Supportive care needs
Quality of life
Gynecological cancer
Texto completo
Introduction

Gynecological cancer remains one of the most prevalent cancers in women. According to the data released by Globocan in 2012, cervical cancer and ovarian cancer are the two gynecological cancers with the highest occurrence in Indonesia. The incidence rates of cervical cancer and ovarian cancer are 17.3 and 8.4, respectively, among 100,000 women per year1.

The effects of cancer pathology and its treatments are so poignant and multidimensional that supportive care is highly needed. For example, impaired physical function is usually associated with symptoms of distress, both of which may bring issues on daily activities and eventually result in unmet supportive care needs2. This seemingly vicious cycle should be anticipated by the early identification of supportive care needs in cancer patients, so that the quality of life (QOL) of cancer patients would be improved.

Supportive care needs refer to the management of cancer symptoms and side effects, empowering of patients’ adaptability and coping, optimization of understanding and information on decision making, and minimizing of body deficiencies3. Supportive care needs are broad in dimension, ranging from physical to sexual4.

QOL is an important goal in the treatment of cancer. Concerns about the physical, psychological, body image disturbance, and symptoms that can cause distress should be anticipated to improve the QOL of cancer patients. A previous study in Indonesia found that the QOL of cancer patients decreased after chemotherapy5. Improving the QOL of cancer patients during treatment improves their adherence to cancer care and treatment and strengthens their ability to overcome cancer-related symptoms or complaints6.

To reach the QOL at its most favorable level, strong supportive care service is the key2,6. Quality nursing care should meet this aim not only to address the accompanying symptoms of cancer and its treatments but also to increase patient satisfaction.

The identification of supportive care support for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy remains an uncommon practice in Indonesia. Supportive care service mostly addresses cancer survivors and overlooks those currently suffering from cancer7,8. To encourage action in providing supportive care for gynecological cancer patients during therapy, more solid evidence is needed to examine how supportive care needs relates to the QOL of gynecological cancer patients undergoing therapy, thus explaining the objective of this study. In this article, we present a part of a large study with emphasis on the association between supportive care needs and QOL.

Method

This work was a cross-sectional correlation study. The sample comprised 153 patients with cervical cancer and ovarian cancer undergoing treatment at two central hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia, from May to June 2016. The respondents were selected through the consecutive sampling method. The number of the sample was calculated using the cross-sectional sample size formula9, with the standard deviation taken from a prior relevant study10.

We used Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34) to measure the need for supportive services. This questionnaire consists of 34 question items under five domains: physical, psychological, supportive care, health system and information, and sexuality11. This tool had a validity score of 0.302-0.792 and a reliability score of 0.933. The QOL was measured using the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Q-C30 (EORTC QLQ-30), Quality of Life Questionnaire Module Cervical Cancer (EORTC QLQ-CX 24), and Quality of Life Questionnaire ovary Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OV28). These instruments underwent forward translation from English to Bahasa Indonesia by an academic language center and an expert panel review. All questionnaires were piloted for validity and reliability testing among 30 respondents in a different setting.

Ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, and Dharmais Cancer Hospital. We adhered to ethical principles, including the right to self-determination, anonymity and confidentiality, and protection from discomfort and harm.

Results

The demographic characteristics of the respondents are presented in Table 1. The table shows that most respondents were 55 years and below, worked as housewives, and were of a low socioeconomic status, as shown in their family income rate. More than half of the respondents were diagnosed with stages I and II cervical cancer, with less than a year of cancer treatment.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the respondents (n=153).

Variable  n (%) 
Age
≤ 55 years  118 (77.1) 
> 55 years  35 (22.9) 
Education
Basic education (elementary, junior high school)  108 (70.9) 
Higher education (senior high school, college)  45 (29.1) 
Occupation
Housewife  126 (82.4) 
Employee  27 (17.6) 
Income
< minimum family income rate  93 (60.8) 
≥ minimum family income rate  60 (39.2) 
Cycle of chemotherapy
1-weekly  52 (40.6) 
3-weekly  76 (59.4) 
Cancer type
Cervical cancer  99 (64.7) 
Ovarian cancer  54 (35.3) 
Cancer stage
Early stage (stage I and II)  104 (68) 
End-stage (stage III and IV)  49 (32) 
Time of therapy
≤ 1 year  141 (92.2) 
> 1 year  12 (7.8) 
Therapy type
Single  95 (62.1) 
Combination  58 (37.9) 

The unmet supportive care needs of the respondents are summarized in Table 2. The highest unmet need was identified as the physical domain (80.4%) and the lowest was sexuality.

Table 2.

Unmet supportive care needs (n=153).

Variable  n (%) 
Supportive care needs
No need  6 (3.9) 
Unmet need  147 (96.1) 
Physical and daily living
No need  30 (19.6) 
Unmet need  123 (80.4) 
Psychological
No need  43 (28.1) 
Unmet need  110 (71.9) 
Patient care and support
No need  39 (25.5) 
Unmet need  114 (74.5) 
Health system and information
No need  45 (29.4) 
Unmet need  108 (70.6) 
Sexuality
No need  99 (64.7) 
Unmet need  54 (35.3) 

Table 3 presents the bivariate analysis that determines the relationship between the need for supportive services and the QOL of gynecological cancer patients undergoing therapy.

Table 3.

Relationship between the need for supportive services and quality of life (n=153).

VariableAnalysis
Mean (SD)  p value (correlation coefficient) 
Global quality of life
General health status  67.65 (19.02)  0.003 (−0.235) 
Functional  73.89 (14.99)  < 0.001* (0.306) 
Physical function  63.83 (21.93)   
Function role  59.91 (24.22)   
Emotional function  83.60 (15.86)   
Cognitive function  88.34 (18.54)   
Social function  76.47 (20.73)   
Symptom  28.89 (15.06)  < 0.001* (0.268) 
Fatigue  44.59 (19.41)   
Nausea and vomiting  23.31 (23.90)   
Pain  39.32 (25.84)   
Difficulty in breathing  17.43 (24.80)   
Insomnia  46.62 (37.33)   
Loss of appetite  43.36 (29.14)   
Constipation  21.13 (36.42)   
Diarrhea  71.24 (23.89)   
Financial difficulties  16.99 (21.67)   
Quality of life: cervical cancer     
Functional  79.50 (14.15)  0.162 (−0.142) 
Self-image  68.33 (41.69)   
Sexual activity  66.67 (27.21)   
Sexual pleasure  50.00 (19.24)   
Sexual function  93.75 (4.16)   
Symptom  34.55 (10.44)  0.669 (0.043) 
Experienced symptoms  36.26 (7.42)   
Lymphedema  8.33 (16.67)   
Peripheral neuropathy  58.33 (41.94)   
Menopause symptoms  23.56 (27.46)   
Sexual anxiety  75.00 (16.67)   
Quality of life: ovarian cancer
Functional  79.69 (10.25)  0.895 (−0.018) 
Self-image  79.32 (17.11)   
Sexuality  93.82 (17.22)   
Behavior to treatment  69.75 (16.64)   
Symptom  27.29 (9.7)  0.587 (0.076) 
Digestive symptoms  21.87 (11.46)   
Peripheral neuropathy  36.62 (22.59)   
Menopause symptoms  19.44 (15.77)   
Other chemotherapy effects  25.18 (13.37)   
Hair loss  44.44 (28.22)   

SD, standard deviation.

*

p value < 0.05.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate a relationship between unmet supportive care needs and the global QOL in the domains of global health, functional, and symptoms in patients with gynecological cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Conversely, no significant association was found when the QOL was measured specifically against cervical cancer and ovarian cancer QOL. A consistent result was reported by a previous study assessing a similar hypothesis in a different cancer population12. The present study affirms the previous finding that patients with more unmet supportive care needs are more likely to have lower QOL.

The QOL of cervical cancer patients is affected by general health status and good relationships between the patients and healthcare professionals13. Cervical cancer patients receiving chemotherapy may experience a number of side effects, such as pain, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and poor appetite, and they affect the QOL of these patients14. Poor management of the treatment's side effects and inadequate self-care negatively affect the QOL of patients6,15. Increasing the QOL of cancer patients during therapy increases patient compliance with the treatment and contributes to their self-efficacy6.

Similar to patients with cervical cancer, ovarian cancer patients also struggle with their interrelated physical and emotional changes, such as anxiety or depression, which may deteriorate their QOL. Simultaneous interactions worsen the existing symptoms and lead to other symptoms16.

In this study, unmet supportive care needs in the physical domain were found to be strongly related to the QOL of the patients. This finding is consistent with that of Effendy et al7, who found that physical problems constituted the most dominant unmet need in Indonesian patients with advanced cancer. An earlier study among Chinese patients also showed a similar result17. The physical symptoms commonly experienced by cancer patients undergoing therapy include decreased appetite, change in the taste of food, hair loss, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue18. Patients need support to cope with these physical symptoms to improve their condition and QOL.

Psychological health status also contributes to the QOL of patients undergoing treatment for cervical cancer19. In their study on supportive care needs, psychosocial status, and QOL of survivors of gynecological cancers, Hodgkinson et al. found that psychological distress is a predictor of unmet supportive care needs and low QOL20. Therefore, cancer patients undergoing therapy need emotional support to cope with their anxiety, sadness, and fear during the process of diagnosis and treatment21. Patients need reassurance and motivation to remain optimistic throughout their cancer experience18.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by the Directorate of the Research and Community Service, Universitas Indonesia.

References
[1]
J. Ferlay, E. Steliarova-Foucher, J. Lortet-Tieulent, S. Rosso, J.W.W. Coebergh, H. Comber, et al.
Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012.
Eur J Cancer., 49 (2013), pp. 1374-1403
[2]
M.N. Liao, S.C. Chen, S.C. Chen, Y.C. Lin, Y.H. Hsu, H.C. Hung, et al.
Changes and predictors of unmet supportive care needs in Taiwanese women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Oncol Nurs Forum., 39 (2012), pp. E380-E389
[3]
R. Maguire, G. Kotronoulas, M. Simpson, C. Paterson.
A systematic review of the supportive care needs of women living with and beyond cervical cancer.
Gynecol Oncol., 136 (2015), pp. 478-490
[4]
M. Minstrell, T. Winzenberg, N. Rankin, C. Hughes, J. Walker.
Supportive care of rural women with breast cancer in Tasmania Australia: changing needs over time.
Psychooncology., 17 (2008), pp. 58-65
[5]
D.A. Perwitasari, J. Atthobari, I. Dwiprahasto, M. Hakimi, H. Gelderblom, H. Putter, et al.
Translation and validation of EORTC QLQ-C30 into Indonesian version for cancer patients in Indonesia.
Jpn J Clin Oncol., 41 (2011), pp. 519-529
[6]
Z. Bayram, Z. Durna, S. Akin.
Quality of life during chemotherapy and satisfaction with nursing care in Turkish breast cancer patients.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)., 23 (2014), pp. 675-684
[7]
C. Effendy, K. Vissers, B.H. Osse, S. Tejawinata, M. Vernooij-Dassen, Y. Engels.
Comparison of problems and unmet needs of patients with advanced cancer in a European country and an Asian country.
Pain Pract., 15 (2015), pp. 433-440
[8]
C. Effendy.
The quality of palliative care for patients with cancer in Indonesia.
Institutes of the Radboud University Medical Center, (2015),
[9]
Dahlan S. Besar sampel dan cara pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian kedokteran dan kesehatan [Sample size and sampling method in medical and health studies]. Jakarta: Salemba Medika; 2009.
[10]
Amatya B, Khan F, Ng L, Galea M, Amatya B, Khan F, et al. Supportive Care Needs following Cancer Treatment: A Comparison of Breast and Brain Cancer in an Australian Cohort. ISRN Rehabil. 2014;2014:1-10. Available at: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2014/945472/.
[11]
B. Bonevski, R. Sanson-Fisher, A. Girgis, L. Burton, P. Cook, A. Boyes, et al.
Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer.
Cancer., 88 (2000), pp. 217-225
[12]
A. Smith, M. King, P. Butow, T. Luckett, P. Grimison, G. Toner, et al.
The prevalence and correlates of supportive care needs in testicular cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study.
Psychooncology., 22 (2013), pp. 2557-2564
[13]
K.T. Ashing Giwa, J.W. Lim, J. Tang.
Surviving cervical cancer: does health-related quality of life influence survival?.
Gynecol Oncol., 118 (2010), pp. 35-42
[14]
G.C. Du Toit, M. Kidd.
Prospective Quality of Life Study of South African Women Undergoing Treatment for Advanced-stage Cervical Cancer.
Clin Ther., 37 (2015), pp. 2324-2331
[15]
G. Cramarossa, E. Chow, L. Zhang, G. Bedard, L. Zeng, A. Sahgal, et al.
Predictive factors for overall quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.
Support Care Cancer., 21 (2013), pp. 1709-1716
[16]
K.H. Hwang, O.H. Cho, Y.S. Yoo.
Symptom clusters of ovarian cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, and their emotional status and quality of life.
Eur J Oncol Nurs., 21 (2016), pp. 215-222
[17]
W.K. So, D.Y. Leung, S.S. Ho, E.T. Lai, J.W. Sit, C.W. Chan.
Associations between social support, prevalent symptoms and health-related quality of life in Chinese women undergoing treatment for breast cancer: a cross-sectional study using structural equation modelling.
Eur J Oncol Nurs., 17 (2013), pp. 442-448
[18]
V.L. Beesley, E.G. Eakin, S. Steginga, J. Aitken, J. Dunn, D. Battistutta.
Unmet needs of gynaecological cancer survivors: implications for developing community support services.
Psychooncology., 17 (2008), pp. 392-400
[19]
K. Osann, S. Hsieh, E.L. Nelson, B.J. Monk, D. Chase, D. Cella, et al.
Factors associated with poor quality of life among cervical cancer survivors: Implications for clinical care and clinical trials.
Gynecol Oncol., 135 (2014), pp. 266-272
[20]
K. Hodgkinson, P. Butow, A. Fuchs, G.E. Hunt, A. Stenlake, K.M. Hobbs, et al.
Long-term survival from gynecologic cancer: Psychosocial outcomes, supportive care needs and positive outcomes.
Gynecol Oncol., 104 (2007), pp. 381-389
[21]
P.N. Butow, M.A. Price, M.L. Bell, P.M. Webb, A. Defazio, M. Friedlander.
Caring for women with ovarian cancer in the last year of life: A longitudinal study of caregiver quality of life, distress and unmet needs.
Gynecol Oncol., 132 (2014), pp. 690-697
Copyright © 2018. Elsevier España, S.L.U.. All rights reserved
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

es en pt
Política de cookies Cookies policy Política de cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.