Información del artículo
Suplemento especial
Este artículo forma parte de:
Vol. 31. Núm S2
4th International Conference for Global Health (ICGH) in conjunction with the 7th Asian International Conference in Humanized Health Care (AIC-HHC)
Más datosAbstract
Gynecological cancer is one of the cancer types, which is deadly cancer among women. Chemotherapy is one of the medical treatment options to kill cancer cells. This study aimed to identify the effect of “DORLAN” Health Education on physical and sexual problems of gynecological cancer patients. Quasi-experimental pre-post-test with control group was used in this study. A sample of 94 women who were undergoing chemotherapy. Data collection was performed using demographic data questionnaires, a FACT-G questionnaire, a Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W) questionnaire, and a Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) questionnaire. The results of this study showed that the “DORLAN” Health Education Package significantly influenced the physical and sexual problems of gynecological cancer patients. “DORLAN” Health Education Package has a significant influence to solve the physical and sexual problems of women under chemotherapy treatment.
Keywords:
Gynecological cancer
Chemotherapy
Side effects chemotherapy
Health education
Artículo
Opciones para acceder a los textos completos de la publicación Enfermería Clínica
Suscriptor
Comprar
Contactar
Teléfono para suscripciones e incidencias
De lunes a viernes de 9h a 18h (GMT+1) excepto los meses de julio y agosto que será de 9 a 15h
Llamadas desde España
932 415 960
Llamadas desde fuera de España
+34 932 415 960
E-mail
References
[1]
L. Lin, L. Yan, Y. Liu, F. Yuan, H. Li, J. Ni.
Incidence and death in 29 cancer groups in 2017 and trend analysis from 1990 to 2017 from the Global Burden of Disease Study.
J Hematol Oncol, 12 (2019), pp. 96
[2]
H.K. Chan, S. Ismail.
Side effects of chemotherapy among cancer patients in a Malaysian general hospital: experiences, perceptions and informational needs from clinical pharmacists.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15 (2014), pp. 5305-5309
[3]
M. Dewi.
Sebaran kanker di Indonesia, riset kesehatan dasar 2007.
Indonesian J Cancer, 11 (2017), pp. 1-8
[4]
R.H. Putri.
Kualitas hidup pasien kanker ginekologi yang menjalani terapi.
Aisyah: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 2 (2017), pp. 69-74
[5]
A.J. Hayder, S.J. Mohammed.
Effectiveness of an education program on nurses’ knowledge concerning side effect of chemotherapy in Baghdad Teaching Hospitals.
Indian J Public Health Res Dev, 9 (2018), pp. 1086-1091
[6]
G.W. Audrina, P. Purhadi, H. Purwanto.
Faktor-Faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat keberhasilan pemberian kemoterapi pada pasien penderita kanker payudara di RSUD Dr. Soetomo dengan menggunakan regresi logistik ordinal.
Jurnal Sains dan Seni ITS, 3 (2014), pp. D36-D41
[7]
L.R. Schover, M. van der Kaaij, E. van Dorst, C. Creutzberg, E. Huyghe, C.E. Kiserud.
Sexual dysfunction and infertility as late effects of cancer treatment.
EJC Suppl, 12 (2014), pp. 41-53
[8]
A.M.R. El-Nemer, M.I.I. El-Zafrani, H.E.S.M. El-Sayed, O.H.M.M. Saadoon.
Utilization of a self-care educational program for alleviating chemotherapy induced physical side effects.
J Cancer Treat Res, 3 (2015), pp. 8-16
[9]
R.B. Valenti.
Chemotherapy education for patients with cancer: a literature review.
Clin J Oncol Nurs, 18 (2014), pp. 637-640
[10]
A.R. Alhamss, S.A.B. El-Dien, I.H. Elshaer.
Health promotion program among breast cancer clients receiving chemotherapy in South Governorates in Gaza.
Eur J Bus Manage, 6 (2014), pp. 129-139
[11]
Cella D. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System [Internet]. Florida: FACIT.org; c2010. Available from: https://www.facit.org/facitorg/questionnaires [cited].
[12]
C. Meston, P. Trapnell.
Development and validation of a five-factor sexual satisfaction and distress scale for women: The Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W).
J Sex Med, 2 (2005), pp. 66-81
[13]
G.D. Zimet, S.S. Powell, G.K. Farley, S. Werkman, K.A. Berkoff.
Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support.
J Pers Assess, 55 (1990), pp. 610-617
[14]
G.S. Hobbs, M.B. Landrum, N.K. Arora, P.A. Ganz, M. van Ryn, J.C. Weeks, et al.
The role of families in decisions regarding cancer treatments.
Cancer, 121 (2015), pp. 1079-1087
[15]
N. Dahiya, A.S. Acharya, D. Bachani, D. Sharma, S. Gupta, K. Haresh, et al.
Quality of life of patients with advanced cervical cancer before and after chemoradiotherapy.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 17 (2016), pp. 3095-3099
[16]
C. Sandsund, R. Towers, K. Thomas, R. Tigue, A. Lalji, A. Fernandes, et al.
Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomized controlled trial using mixed methods.
BMJ Support Palliat Care, 10 (2020), pp. e16
[17]
M.R.J. Salakari, T. Surakka, R. Nurminen, L. Pylkkänen.
Effects of rehabilitation among patients with advances cancer: a systematic review.
Acta Oncol (Madr), 54 (2015), pp. 618-628
[18]
M. Matzo, C. Graham, C.L. Troup, B. Ferrell.
Development of a patient education resource for women with gynecologic cancers.
Clin J Oncol Nurs, 18 (2014), pp. 343-348
[19]
C. Stabile, S. Goldfarb, R.E. Baser, D.J. Goldfrank, N.R. Abu-Rustum, R.R. Barakat, et al.
Sexual health needs and educational intervention preferences for women with cancer.
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 165 (2017), pp. 77-84
[20]
A. Blouet, M. Zinger, O. Capitain, S. Landry, H. Bourgeois, V.T. Seegers, et al.
Sexual quality of life evaluation after treatment among women with breast cancer under 35 years old.
Support Care Cancer, 27 (2019), pp. 879-885
