Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica Characterization, antifungal susceptibility and virulence of Candida parapsilosi...
Información de la revista
Vol. 41. Núm. 2.
Páginas 99-102 (Febrero 2023)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
519
Vol. 41. Núm. 2.
Páginas 99-102 (Febrero 2023)
Brief report
Acceso a texto completo
Characterization, antifungal susceptibility and virulence of Candida parapsilosis complex isolates in a tertiary hospital in Cantabria, Northern Spain
Caracterización, sensibilidad antifúngica y virulencia de aislamientos del complejo Candida parapsilosis en un hospital terciario en Cantabria, norte de España
Visitas
519
Carlos Ruiz de Alegría Puiga,
Autor para correspondencia
carlosrdap@hotmail.com

Corresponding author.
, María del Sol García Merinoa, Ana De Malet Pintos-Fonsecaa, Jesús Agüero Balbína,b
a Microbiology Service, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
b Department of Molecular Biology, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Contenido relaccionado
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2023;41:67-910.1016/j.eimc.2022.09.005
María Teresa Martín-Gómez, Mireia Puig-Asensio
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (1)
Abstract
Introduction

The correct identification of the species within the Candida parapsilosis complex has become relevant due to the resistance of Candida metapsilosis to antifungals. We describe the characteristics of the Candida parapsilosis complex isolates, with respect to antifungal resistance and biofilm formation.

Methods

We perform a descriptive cross-sectional study in 30 strains, collected in a tertiary hospital. All strains, were identified by Vitek2, Vitek-MS™ systems and by ITS sequencing. The antifungal susceptibility profile was obtained with Sensititre™ panels, while biomass production and metabolic activity were quantified by means of crystal violet and XTT reduction assay, respectively.

Results

There was a 100% correlation between Vitek-MS™ and ITS sequencing. All isolates were susceptible to the nine antifungals tested. The metabolic activity and biomass production tests did not show any difference among the subtypes.

Conclusions

The Vitek-MS™ system provides acceptable identification. We did not find significant differences neither in azole resistance nor in biofilm formation.

Keywords:
Candida parapsilosis
Candida orthopsilosis
Candida metapsilosis
MALDI-TOF MS
Biofilm
Resumen
Introducción

La correcta identificación del complejo Candida parasilopsis es relevante debido a la resistencia antifúngica de Candida metasilopsis. Describimos las características de aislados del complejo Candida parapsilosis respecto a la resistencia antifúngica y formación de biopelícula.

Métodos

Se realiza un estudio descriptivo transversal de 30 cepas recolectadas en un hospital terciario. Todas se identificaron por los sistemas Vitek2, MALDI-TOF MS Vitek-MSTM y por secuenciación de las regiones ITS. La sensibilidad antifúngica se realizó con paneles SensititreTM. Para la producción de biomasa y la actividad metabólica se emplearon la medición de cristal violeta y el ensayo de reducción de XTT, respectivamente.

Resultados

Hubo una correlación del 100% entre Vitek-MSTM y la secuencia de ITS. Todos los aislados fueron sensibles a los 9 antifúngicos evaluados. Los ensayos de actividad metabólica y producción de biomasa no arrojaron diferencias entre los subtipos.

Conclusiones

El sistema Vitek-MSTM proporciona una identificación aceptable. No encontramos diferencias significativas ni en la resistencia a azoles ni en la formación de biopelículas.

Palabras clave:
Candida parapsilosis
Candida orthopsilosis
Candida metapsilosis
MALDI-TOF MS™
Biopelícula
Texto completo
Introduction

Candida parapsilosis complex is becoming one of the emerging causes of candidaemia in the world, being the second or third cause of candidaemia, after Candida albicans.1C. parapsilosis complex is well known as a cause of nosocomial infection, particularly in neonates and especially associated with intravascular devices and parenteral nutrition.2

Roy and Meyer in 1998 confirmed, with DNA relatedness and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analyses, different genotypes within the C. parapsilosis group, separating them into three subtypes I–III.3 It was Tavanti et al., in 2005, who called the three groups C. parapsilosis sensu stricto (I), Candida orthopsilosis (II), and Candida metapsilosis (III).4 Until recently, the commercial systems did not differentiate these groups, making it necessary to carry out a restriction analysis of polymorphisms in the alcohol dehydrogenase (SADH) gene to differentiate them, common in the three species, also proposed by Tavanti in 2007.5 In 2008, Lockhart et al. added a new subtype to this complex, Lodderomyces elongisporus.6 The matrix-assisted laser desorption/isolation-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) technique can identify the four subtypes.

The percentage of Candida orthopsilosis (5.1–6.5%) and Candida metapsilosis (1.5–1.8%) subtypes compared to C. parapsilosis sensu stricto is low in the larger series.6,7 In Spain, although this percentage was 8.2% and 1.1% respectively in 2011,8 in our hospital these percentages are 4.21% for C. metapsilosis and 1.05% for C. orthopsilosis.9

Antifungal susceptibility profiles of the C. parapsilosis species complex reveals only slight differences between the three Candida subspecies, which has suggested that their routine discrimination is not necessary for the clinical laboratory.10 But very few isolates have been compared in those studies.

Taking into account the above, in this study we carried out a characterization of our C.parapsilosis species complex isolates in order to: (i) look for phenotypical differences; (ii) check the suitability of MALDI-TOF for identification, (iii) test the antifungal susceptibility, and (iv) assay the biofilm formation.

Methods

Candidaspp. strains. Twelve C. metapsilosis and eight C. orthopsilosis clinical strains, collected between 2005 and 2019 in the Microbiology Department of the University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain, were chosen. For the global study, a collection of 10 Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto strains, obtained from blood cultures during the same period, were also added to the analysis.

The eight C. orthopsilosis strains were collected from: blood cultures (3), urine, external ear exudate (1) and biopsy (1). The 12C. metapsilosis strains were collected from: blood cultures (8), external ear exudate (1), vaginal exudate (1), induced sputum (1) and tracheal aspirate (1).

Phenotypic automated system. The Vitek®2 with AST-YS8 identification cards (bioMérieux, Marcy-I’Etoile, France) were used for the analysis according to the manufacturer's instructions.

MALDI-TOF MS Vitek-MS™ system (bioMérieux, Marcy-I’Etoile, France). Identification of strains was performed following manufacturer's recommendations. Measurement was performed with a Vitek-MS™ instrument supported by SARAMIS MS-IVD v3.0, and v3.2 databases (Anagnos Tee GMBH, BioMérieux).

Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS). The ITS region was amplified with primers described previously by White el al.11 The sequences of the isolates were compared with those deposited in the GenBank database using BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

Antifungal susceptibility test. The antifungigrams were performed with Sensititre™ YeastOne YO10 (TREK Diagnostic Systems, East Grinstead, United Kingdom), following the manufacturer's recommendations. Antimicrobial susceptibility was analyzed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI-M59).

Static biofilm formation assays. Assays were performed in 96-well polystyrene plates, as previously reported.12 Finally, we filled two plates with samples in triplicate for the two assays and incubated them at 37°C for 24h.

Crystal violet biofilm inhibition assay. Biomass formation was quantified after staining with crystal violet (125μL 0.1%) and extracting the crystal violet with acetic acid (125μL 30%). Absorbance was measured at 550nm using a microplate reader (Tecan Microplate Reader, Infinite 200 PRO, Männedorf, Switzerland). Strains were tested in triplicate and classified according to Marcos-Zambrano et al.13 score as low biofilm forming (LBF; <0.44), moderate biofilm forming (MBF; 0.44–1.17), and high biofilm forming (HBF; >1.17).

XTT reduction assay. To quantify biofilm metabolic activity, the reduction of 2.3-Bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT) was measured in the other plate.14 The optical density (OD) value at 490nm was measured using a microplate reader (Tecan Microplate Reader, Infinite 200 PRO, Männedorf, Switzerland). Strains were tested in triplicate and classified based on their metabolic activity using the XTT reduction assay as low metabolic activity (LMA; <0.097), moderate metabolic activity (MMA; 0.097–0.2), and high metabolic activity (HMA; >0.2).13

Data analysis. The statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS computer software (IBM SPSS Version 20.0). The analysis of differences, in antifungal susceptibility and biofilm formation patterns among subspecies, were evaluated using non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results

MALDI-TOF Vitek-MS™, with v3.2 library version, identified correctly all the isolates with a crude agreement of 100% (20/20) compared to the sequencing. Only some of these strains were analyzed by v3.0 library version, where C. metapsilosis was not included, so it misidentified 44.4% (4/9) of the isolations as C. orthopsilosis and 55.5% (5/9) as C. parapsilosis, while C. orthopsilosis were all correctly identified, 100% (7/7).

Vitek2 didn’t include these species in the database, so the strains were identified only at the species complex level. In an in-depth analysis of AST-YS8 cards in the C. orthopsilosis group 75% (6/8), 87.5% (7/8) and 87.5% (7/8) of the strains turned positive in L-lisine aramidase, D-melobiose assimilation and D-sorbose assimilation, respectively, while only 1% turned positive in C. parapsilosis sensu stricto group and none in C. metapsilosis group. Also, in C. parapsilosis sensu stricto group, tirosin arilamidase became positive in 70% (7/10) of the strains while only in 16.6% (2/12) and 12.5% (1/8) became positive in C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis groups, respectively.

The results of antifungal susceptibility tests confirmed that all isolates were susceptible to the nine antifungals tested. We found significant differences in the susceptibility to fluconazole of C. metapsilosis with respect to C. parapsilopsis (p<0.01). In contrast, we did not find significant differences in susceptibility between C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis (p=0.14) (Fig. 1A). The strains were equally susceptible to amphotericin B showing a slightly higher MICs for micafungin and anidulafungin.

Fig. 1.

Fluconazole and echinocandins MIC distribution for the twenty studied Candida isolations.

(0,28MB).

We observed statistically significant differences for micafungin in C. parapsilosis sensu stricto in relation with C. metapsilosis (p<0.01) but not in C. parapsilosis sensu stricto regarding C. orthopsilosis (p=0.06). On the other hand, the difference in susceptibility to anidulafungin was statistically significant in C. parapsilosis sensu stricto with regard to C. metapsilosis (p<0.01). Conversely, differences between C. parapsilosis sensu stricto and C. orthopsilosis were not statistically significant (p=0.078). In fact, C. metapsilosis showed lower MICs (Fig. 1B–D).

We found statistically significant differences between C. parapsilosis sensu stricto and C. metapsilosis (p<0.01). Conversely, the metabolic activity of the strains was not useful to distinguish the species from each other (Table 1).

Table 1.

Strains of Candida parapsilosis complex classified according to the degree of biomass production and metabolic activity.

  Biomass productionMetabolic activity
  LBF (<0.44 OD)  MBF (0.44–1.17 OD)  HBF (>1.17 OD)  LMA (<0.09 OD)  MMA (0.09–0.2 OD)  HMA (>0.2 OD) 
C. orthopsilosis (8)  2 (25%)  4 (50%)  2 (25%)  7 (87.5%)  1 (12.5%) 
C. methapsilosis (12)  2 (16.7%)  8 (66.6%)  2 (16.7%)  1 (8.4%)  9 (75%)  2 (16.6%) 
C. parapsilosis sensu stricto (10)  4 (40%)  2 (20%)  4 (40%)  4 (40%)  6 (60%) 
n=30  8 (26.7%)  14 (46.6%)  8 (26.7%)  1 (3.4%)  20 (66.6%)  9 (30%) 

*LBF: low biofilm former, MBF: medium biofilm former, HBF: high biofilm former, LMA: low metabolic activity, MMA: medium metabolic activity, HMA: high metabolic activity, OD: optical density.

Discussion

Although identification of clinical isolates of C. parapsilosis complex belonging to the subtypes C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis cannot be accomplished following phenotypic systems,15 the results of this study, allow to update the databases of these systems, since not all microbiological laboratories have access to MALDI-TOF systems.

On the other hand, although currently there are very few reported clinical isolates of the two subtypes considered here, this is expected to change with the implementation of new identification systems, such as with the latest version of MALDI-TOF database. This will influence the determination of the real prevalence and incidence, probably increasing the magnitude of the latter with respect to the prevalence.

We can confirm the moderate or high production capacity of biofilm production of the complex in our strains, as previously reported,13 as well as a slightly higher metabolic activity in the C. parapsilosis sensu stricto group (Table 1).

Finally, we consider desirable the identification of the three subtypes, both for epidemiological surveillance and for the different susceptibility patterns to fluconazole, anidulafungin and micafungin. In our strains, we found C. metapsilosis more resistant than C. parapsilopsis sensu estricto as previously reported,5 but not in C. orthopsilosis, in contrast to de Toro et al.10 Currently there is no scientific evidence that does not justify the use of fluconazole in C. metapsilosis, but it is worth highlighting the little information available on the epidemiological distribution and resistance of the C. parapsilosis complex. Otherwise, all the strains were equally susceptible to flucytosine in contrast to other authors.5 Finally, the MICs of amphotericin B and echinocandins were lower against C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis than those against C. parapsilosis sensu stricto as in previous studies.6,10

Transparency declarations

All authors have nothing to declare. This study has not been financially supported by any Diagnostic/Pharmaceutical company.

Ethical approval

Not applicable

Funding

This study was supported by Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013–2016, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/0007).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Alain Ocampo Sosa and Dr. Israel Nieto Gañan for reviewing and correcting the manuscript.

References
[1]
E. Kazak, H. Akın, B. Ener, D. Sığırlı, Ö. Özkan, E. Gürcüoğlu, et al.
An investigation of Candida species isolated from blood cultures during 17 years in a university hospital.
Mycoses, 57 (2014), pp. 623-629
[2]
J.J. Weems Jr., M.E. Chamberland, J. Ward, M. Willy, A.A. Padhye, S.L. Solomon.
Candida parapsilosis fungemia associated with parenteral nutrition and contaminated blood pressure transducers.
J Clin Microbiol, 25 (1987), pp. 1029-1032
[3]
B. Roy, S.A. Meyer.
Confirmation of the distinct genotype groups within the form species Candida parapsilosis.
J Clin Microbiol, 36 (1998), pp. 216-218
[4]
A. Tavanti, A.D. Davidson, N.A. Gow, M.C. Maiden, F.C. Odds.
Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis groups II and III.
J Clin Microbiol, 43 (2005), pp. 284-292
[5]
A. Tavanti, L.A. Hensgens, E. Ghelardi, M. Campa, S. Senesi.
Genotyping of Candida orthopsilosis clinical isolates by amplification fragment length polymorphism reveals genetic diversity among independent isolates and strain maintenance within patients.
J Clin Microbiol, 45 (2007), pp. 1455-1462
[6]
S.R. Lockhart, S.A. Messer, M.A. Pfaller, D.J. Diekema.
Lodderomyces elongisporus masquerading as Candida parapsilosis as a cause of bloodstream infections.
J Clin Microbiol, 46 (2008), pp. 374-376
[7]
D.J. Diekema, S.A. Messer, L.B. Boyken, R.J. Hollis, J. Kroeger, S. Tendolkar, et al.
In vitro activity of seven systemically active antifungal agents against a large global collection of rare Candida species as determined by CLSI broth microdilution methods.
J Clin Microbiol, 47 (2009), pp. 3170-3177
[8]
E. Cantón, J. Pemán, G. Quindós, E. Eraso, I. Miranda-Zapico, M. Álvarez, et al.
Prospective multicenter study of the epidemiology, molecular identification, and antifungal susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis isolated from patients with candidemia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 55 (2011), pp. 5590-5596
[9]
C. Ruiz de Alegría Puig, J. Agüero-Balbín, C. Fernández-Mazarrasa, L. Martínez-Martínez.
Evaluation of the Vitek-MS™ system in the identification of Candida isolates from bloodstream infections.
Rev Iberoam Micol, 35 (2018), pp. 130-133
[10]
M. de Toro, M.J. Torres, R. Maite, J. Aznar.
Characterization of Candida parapsilosis complex isolates.
Clin Microbiol Infect, 17 (2011), pp. 418-424
[11]
T.J. White, M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J. Sninsky.
PCR protocols, a guide to methods and applications.
Academic Press, (1990), pp. 315-322
[12]
G.D. Christensen, W.A. Simpson, J.J. Younger, L.M. Baddour, F.F. Barrett, D.M. Melton, et al.
Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices.
J Clin Microbiol, 22 (1985), pp. 996-1006
[13]
L.J. Marcos-Zambrano, P. Escribano, E. Bouza, J. Guinea.
Production of biofilm by Candida and non-Candida spp. isolates causing fungemia: comparison of biomass production and metabolic activity and development of cut-off points.
Int J Med Microbiol, 304 (2014), pp. 1192-1198
[14]
A. Valentín, E. Cantón, J. Pemán, J.P. Martínez.
Voriconazole inhibits biofilm formation in different species of the genus Candida.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 67 (2012), pp. 2418-2423
[15]
A. Arastehfar, F. Daneshnia, M. Kord, M. Roudbary, H. Zarrinfar, W. Fang, et al.
Comparison of 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX MALDI-TOF MS, and rDNA sequencing for a wide range of clinically isolated yeast species: improved identification by combining 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX as an alternative strategy for developing countries.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 9 (2019), pp. 176
Copyright © 2021. Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos