Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
H.S. Luft, J.P. Bunker, A.C. Enthoven.
Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.
N Engl J Med, 301 (1979), pp. 1364-1369
[2.]
J. Daley.
Invited commentary: quality of care and the volume-outcome relationships. What’s next for surgery.
Surgery, 131 (2002), pp. 16-18
[3.]
J. Birkmeyer, A. Siewers, E. Finlayson, et al.
Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.
N Engl J Med, 346 (2002), pp. 1128-1137
[4.]
R.E. Glasgow, S.J. Mulvihill.
Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer.
West J Med, 165 (1996), pp. 294-300
[5.]
C. Christian, M. Gustafson, R. Betensky, J. Daley, M. Zinner.
The leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high-quality surgical canters.
Ann Surg, 238 (2003), pp. 447-457
[6.]
T. Russell.
Invited commentary: volume standards for high-risk operations: an American College of Surgeons’ view.
Surgery, 130 (2001), pp. 423-424
Copyright © 2004. Asociación Española de Cirujanos
