metricas
covid
Atención Primaria Electrocardiographic evaluation in healthy Mexican students
Información de la revista
Visitas
573
Vol. 57. Núm. 11.
(Noviembre 2025)
Scientific letter
Acceso a texto completo
Electrocardiographic evaluation in healthy Mexican students
Evaluación electrocardiográfica en estudiantes Mexicanos sanos
Visitas
573
Chesnel Alberon Dervil Arroyo1, Guadalupe del Carmen Baeza Flores1, Crystell Guadalupe Guzmán Priego
Autor para correspondencia
crystell_guzman@hotmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Manuel Alfonso Baños González, Sergio Quiroz Gómez, Karla del Socorro Celorio Méndez
Laboratorio cardiometabolismo, División Académica de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Villahermosa, Tabasco, Mexico
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (1)
Table 1. Students features and values of ECG.
Tablas
Texto completo

The resting electrocardiogram (ECG) is a widely available, low-cost, and safe tool. It is commonly performed for cardiovascular disease screening, prediction of higher mortality risk, and, promotion of cardiovascular safety.1

An increasing number of studies have shown that discrete ECG alterations in children and young adults are related to age, gender,2 increased BMI (Body Mass Index),3 and consumption of energy drinks4 or alcohol.5

Therefore, we decided to extend our observations by studying the electrocardiographic parameters in healthy students from the División Académica de Ciencias de la Salud of the Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco (UJAT-DACS), Tabasco, México.

A descriptive, cross-sectional, analytical study was conducted. The following variables were collected: demographic (age and sex), anthropometric measures (weight, height, and BMI), comorbidities, personal, and family history, and 12 lead electrocardiograms. A standard 12-lead ECG was recorded in the supine position using a Bionet CARDIO 7 electrocardiograph at a paper speed of 25mm/s and voltage of 10mV/s, and an experienced cardiologist evaluated all the ECG. The variables were summarized according to their nature. To analyze the changes between sexes, we conducted the T-Test, χ2 test, or Fisher's exact test to compare using GraphPad Prism Software. Differences were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.

Finally, we examined the standard ECG in the 95 young adults. The mean age of the participants was 21.3±2.0 years, and 75.8% (n=72) were men. The mean body mass index of the group studied was 25.4±3.7kg/m2. In the overall study group, the heart rate mean was normal. Despite this fact, we demonstrated sex differences. More specifically, P wave (51.7±22.8 vs 38.8±21.8, p=0.020), and QRS duration (84.3±12.2 vs 76.7±7.6, p=0.006) were higher in males than women (Table 1), which is consistent with the reports of other studies. Van der Ende and coworkers suggested that the median duration of the P wave, the PQ interval, and the QRSd were higher in males compared with females.6 This observation raises the question that the physiology and anatomy of the male and female heart have important differences. In the heart, the arteries that irrigate it, and the size of the wall of the ventricles (the left one in particular) are smaller in women than in men. It has been described that the female heart has a higher ejection fraction and beats faster but generates a lower cardiac output.

Table 1.

Students features and values of ECG.

Features  Total  Male 75.8% (n=72)  Female 24.2% (n=23)  p-Value 
Age (years)  21.3±2.0  21.1±1.8  22.0±2.3  0.042* 
Height (m21.6±0.08  1.7±0.06  1.5±0.06  0.000* 
Weight (kg)  71.9±12.8  74.4±12.7  64.1±9.5  0.001* 
BMI (kg/m225.4±3.7  25.3±3.7  25.7±3.6  0.672 
Thinness  2.1% (n=2)  2.8% (n=2)  0% (n=0)  0.404
Normal  50.5% (n=48)  54.2% (n=39)  39.1% (n=9) 
Overweight  34.7% (n=33)  30.6% (n=22)  47.8% (n=11) 
Obesity  12.6% (n=12)  12.5% (n=9)  13% (n=3) 
Familiar history  81.1% (n=77)  77.8% (n=56)  91.3% (n=21)  0.224 
Hypertension  68.4% (n=65)  63.9% (n=46)  82.6% (n=19)  0.124 
Diabetes  58.9% (n=56)  56.9% (n=41)  65.2% (n=15)  0.627 
Heart attack  9.5% (n=9)  5.6% (n=4)  21.7% (n=5)  0.035* 
Cancer  11.6% (n=11)  11.1% (n=8)  13.0% (n=3)  0.724 
Heart rate (bpm)  75.3±13.21  75.1±12.8  76.1±12.1  0.727 
Cardiac axis  60.9±27.1  60.3±23.4  62.7±36.9  0.718 
P WAVE  48.6±23.1  51.7±22.8  38.8±21.8  0.020* 
PR interval (ms)  147.8±21.3  146.8±23.3  151.0±12.9  0.410 
Duration QRS (ms)  82.5±11.7  84.3±12.2  76.7±7.6  0.006* 
QT interval (ms)  365.1±28.3  364.2±29.9  368.1±23.0  0.563 
QTc (ms) Fridericia  391.6±18.1  389.9±19.3  396.8±12.5  0.110 
RR interval  815.0±132.0  819.9±137.3  799.7±115.2  0.525 
ECG findings  25.3% (n=24)  31.9% (n=31.9)  4.3% (n=1)  0.006* 
Rhythm disturbances  70.8% (n=17)  69.6% (n=16)  100% (n=1)  0.807
Conduction disturbances  25.0% (n=6)  100% (n=6)  0% (n=0) 
Abnormal morphology  4.2% (n=1)  100% (n=6)  0% (n=0) 

Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index.

*

p-value<0.05.

It is worth noting that ECG findings were higher in males than females. The most common finding on ECG was premature Atrial Contraction (PAC), sinus bradycardia, pre-excitation syndrome, nodal rhythm, Right Bundle Branch Block (RBBB), Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (IRBBB), Short QT, and Brugada Pattern Type 2 and QT Prolonged.

To conclude, our findings in this prospective study support the notion of the usefulness of resting electrocardiogram (ECG). The screening ECG in healthy Mexican students suggests that a quarter of the sample had ECG findings, and the benchmark datasets grouped in rhythm disturbances, conduction disturbances, and abnormal morphology.

Ethical considerations

All participants signed informed consent. This research was developed in reference to General Health Law regulations on Health Research and was approved by the Universidad Juárez Autónoma Research Committee with register number JI-LCA068.

Funding

Any funding to declare.

Conflicts of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
R. Yagi, Y. Mori, S. Goto, T. Iwami, K. Inoue.
Routine electrocardiogram screening and cardiovascular disease events in adults.
JAMA Intern Med, 184 (2024), pp. 1035-1044
[2]
S. Erelund, K. Karp, U. Wiklund, R. Hörnsten, S. Arvidsson.
Are ECG changes in heart-healthy individuals of various ages related to cardiac disease 20 years later?.
Upsala J Med Sci, 21 (2021), pp. 126
[3]
G.J. Hassing, H.E.C. van der Wall, G.J.P. van Westen, M.J.B. Kemme, A. Adiyaman, A. Elvan, et al.
Body mass index related electrocardiographic findings in healthy young individuals with a normal body mass index.
Netherlands Heart J, 27 (2019), pp. 506-512
[4]
S. Hajsadeghi, F. Mohammadpour, M.J. Manteghi, K. Kordshakeri, M. Tokazebani, E. Rahmani, et al.
Effects of energy drinks on blood pressure, heart rate, and electrocardiographic parameters: An experimental study on healthy young adults.
Anatol J Cardiol, 16 (2016), pp. 94-99
[5]
L. de Veld, N. van der Lely, B.J.M. Hermans, J.J. van Hoof, L. Wong, A.S. Vink.
QTc prolongation in adolescents with acute alcohol intoxication.
Eur J Pediatrics, 181 (2022), pp. 2757-2770
[6]
M.Y. van der Ende, J.E. Siland, H. Snieder, P. van der Harst, M. Rienstra.
Population-based values and abnormalities of the electrocardiogram in the general Dutch population: the LifeLines Cohort Study.
Clin Cardiol, 40 (2017), pp. 865-872

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Copyright © 2025. The Authors
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas