metricas
covid
Annals of Hepatology ASSESSMENT OF LIPID PROFILE AND ESTIMATED CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN PATIENTS WITH P...
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue S2.
Abstracts of the 2025 Annual Meeting of the ALEH
(September 2025)
Vol. 30. Issue S2.
Abstracts of the 2025 Annual Meeting of the ALEH
(September 2025)
#171
Full text access
ASSESSMENT OF LIPID PROFILE AND ESTIMATED CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS
Visits
124
Rodrigo Toledo Galván1, Deborah Ernestina Espinoza López1, Maria Beatriz Jourdan Rodriguez1, Viridiana López Ladrón de Guevara1, María de Fátima Higuera de la Tijera1
1 Hospital General de México Dr. Eduardo Liceaga.
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Tables
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 30. Issue S2

Abstracts of the 2025 Annual Meeting of the ALEH

More info
Introduction and Objectives

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is characterized by a distinctive lipid profile, partly influenced by elevated lipoprotein-X, not routinely measured in clinical practice. In Mexico, genetic predisposition to metabolic disorders increase cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to determine the lipid profile in patients with PBC and compare it with individuals without chronic liver disease (CLD).

Materials and Methods

A retrospective, observational, analytical case-control study was conducted in 2025, including 50 female patients aged 40–60 years with compensated PBC treated at a tertiary care hospital. They were compared with 50 age- and sex-matched controls without CLD. Variables included lipid profile, glycemic control, and 10-year cardiovascular risk estimated using Framingham and ASCVD scores. Statistical analysis used central tendency, dispersion, and Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).

Results

PBC patients showed higher mean total cholesterol (166 ± 69.8 vs. 146 ± 50.2 mg/dL), HDL (52.98 ± 26.78 vs. 45.52 ± 25.90 mg/dL), and LDL (91.52 ± 53.72 vs. 86.02 ± 39.22 mg/dL), though differences were not statistically significant. Triglycerides (107.76 ± 46.0 vs. 150.3 ± 67.3 mg/dL, p < 0.01) and HbA1c (5.42 ± 0.91% vs. 6.09 ± 1.02%, p < 0.01) were significantly lower in PBC. However, ASCVD risk was significantly higher in PBC (2.2 ± 1.3% vs. 1.59 ± 0.92%, p = 0.01), while Framingham risk was similar.

Conclusions

Despite a more favorable metabolic profile, PBC patients showed higher ASCVD-estimated cardiovascular risk, suggesting current risk tools may underestimate disease-specific factors.

Full Text

Conflict of interest: None

Variable  PBC (n=50)  Control (n=50)  p-value 
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)  166 ± 69.8  146 ± 50.2  0.07 
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)  52.98 ± 26.8  45.52 ± 25.9  0.15 
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)  91.52 ± 53.7  86.02 ± 39.2  0.59 
Triglycerides (mg/dL)  107.76 ± 46.0  150.3 ± 67.3  < 0.01 
Glycated hemoglobin (%)  5.42 ± 0.91  6.09 ± 1.02  < 0.01 
10-year cardiovascular risk (Framingham score) (%)  4.16 ± 0.02  4.02 ± 2.70  0.81 
10-year cardiovascular risk (ASCVD score) (%)  2.2 ± 1.3  1.59 ± 0.92  0.01 

Download PDF
Article options
Tools