Buscar en
Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine
Toda la web
Inicio Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine Deaths by firearm and intraoral gunshot: Medicolegal etiology
Journal Information
Vol. 43. Issue 2.
Pages 70-78 (April - June 2017)
Visits
46840
Vol. 43. Issue 2.
Pages 70-78 (April - June 2017)
Review
DOI: 10.1016/j.remle.2017.04.002
Full text access
Deaths by firearm and intraoral gunshot: Medicolegal etiology
Muertes por arma de fuego y disparo intraoral: etiología medicolegal
Visits
...
Enrique Dorado-Fernándeza,d,
Corresponding author
endorado@pdi.ucm.es

Corresponding author.
, Eduardo Andreu-Tenab,d, Concepción Magaña-Loartea, Elisa Ruiz-Tagle Fernándezc,d, David Cáceres-Monllord, José Luis Souto López-Mosquerae, Andrés Santiago-Sáezd
a Laboratorio de Antropología, Instituto Anatómico Forense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
b Instituto Anatómico Forense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
c Servicio Médico Forense, Juzgados de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
d Escuela de Medicina Legal, Departamento de Toxicología y Legislación Sanitaria, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
e Clínica Médico Forense, Juzgados Plaza de Castilla, Madrid, Spain
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (8)
Show moreShow less
Tables (5)
Table 1. Gun preferentially used in the different aetiologies of firearm-related death.
Table 2. Intraoral option by type of gun.
Table 3. Single-shot frequency.
Table 4. Intraoral shooting by etiology (percentage and number of cases compared with the total).
Table 5. Bullet trajectory in the different aetiologies.
Show moreShow less
Abstract

Investigation of deaths caused by the use of firearms, with their different homicidal, suicidal and accidental etiologies, is part of the medical-forensic expert's regular work. Mouth is usually chosen by the suicide using a gun. However, gunshot rarely occurs – or it is an exception, in homicidal or accidental deaths. In this paper we shall review the different variables which are useful in order to discriminate the different etiologies, such as the scene, the kind of weapon used, the number of injuries sustained and their location, or the direction of the bullet. Also, we shall particularly focus on the types of injuries caused. The way that lips, teeth and tongue are affected is of particular interest in this investigation. For this purpose, we have conducted a research in books and medical articles, including the PubMed, Dialnet and Academic Google bibliographic database.

Keywords:
Firearms
Suicide
Homicide
Head injuries
Facial injuries
Mouth injuries
Epidemiology
Gunshot wounds
Resumen

El estudio de las muertes por arma de fuego, en sus distintas etiologías, forma parte de la práctica habitual medicoforense. En aquellas de origen suicida, la boca constituye un lugar preferente para el disparo, de forma contraria a los supuestos homicidas o accidentales. En el presente trabajo se revisan distintas variables de utilidad para la determinación medicoforense de la etiología, con especial referencia a los disparos intraorales. Entre ellas se analizan el lugar del suceso, tipo de arma empleada, el número y localización de las heridas, el trayecto seguido por el proyectil y las lesiones ocasionadas, siendo de especial interés la forma en que resultan afectados los labios, los dientes y la lengua. Para lo cual se ha realizado una búsqueda sistemática, incluyendo las bases de datos bibliográficas PubMed, Dialnet y Google Académico.

Palabras clave:
Armas de fuego
Suicidio
Homicidio
Lesiones en cabeza
Lesiones en la cara
Lesiones en boca
Epidemiología
Heridas por arma de fuego
Full Text
Introduction

Firearm-related deaths constitute a major chapter in forensic medicine. The use of firearms in the settings of homicides, suicides and accidents affords them a special juridical and medical/legal significance. The habitual subjects of forensic examinations include measurements of the distance and direction of shots, wound characteristics or the possible survival of the victims, and as a preliminary and fundamental issue, differentiation between the causes of death by suicide and homicide, which will determine how the investigation develops.

The incidence of deaths of this type is indicative of its significance, although there are marked differences based on several factors, among which the ease of access to this type of weapon stands out, with the result of its prohibition a subject of study.1

The figures are very different and show the frequent use of firearms in countries where their availability is greater, such as Switzerland2 or the United States3; in the US they are involved in 68% of homicides and 51% of suicides. Similarly, in Argentina, they are involved in 28.2% of suicides and up to 70% of homicides.4

These figures differ considerable from those obtained in Asian countries. In Japan, where hanging is the preferred method of suicide, the use of firearms is found only in 0.2% of cases, in line with the fact that the population of Asians residing in the United States has the lowest rate of suicide by this method.5 Similarly, in Shanghai, China, the use of a firearm is recorded only in 0.5% of homicides and 0.7% of suicides, with hanging and deliberate jumping from heights being the main methods.6

With regard to Spain, in the Forensic Pathology Institute of Madrid, which performs the majority of autopsies in the autonomous community, firearms appear to be involved in 5% of suicides, where there is a preference for jumping, and 19% of homicides, where knives are predominately used.7 Likewise, a study on suicide in Seville found that firearms only in 7.5% of these deaths, a significantly lower percentage than those for hanging and jumping.8

Although the examination of the corpse and the site of the incident generally provide sufficient evidence to differentiate between suicide and homicide, there are cases where doubt remains, particularly those involving bodies in poor condition or after an insufficient examination during the autopsy, and which may, on occasion, be unsolvable. In these cases, in addition to basic studies—such as gunpowder residue and blood spatter analysis, the study of ridge patterns in prints on the firearm or the search for other signs of violence at the scene and on the body—of particular interest will be the number and location of wounds, the type of firearm used, the site of the event, the distance and the trajectory of the bullet, and the type of injury. This review analyses these latter factors. Although shootings are addressed according to their different causes, this review focuses on firearm-related mouth injuries, with the limitations entailed by frequency of homicides in these cases being low.

Discriminant function analysis of homicides and suicidesSex and age

As is the case with violent deaths in general, the proportion of men who die from gunshot wounds is clearly higher than that of women, being even more pronounced in cases of suicide. For example, Verzeletti et al.9 reported a significant predominance of men (92.9%) among the suicides that comprise their study, a figure that drops to 72.9% when referring to homicide victims; Druid10 notes a figure of 98.59% of men in suicides and 59.2% in homicides; and Karger et al.11 reported figures of 89.4% and 73.3%, respectively.

If we refer specifically to the preference of each sex for this method of suicide, the results are striking12: in Argentina, the method was chosen by 37.6% of men, whereas for women the rate was 25.9%; in the US, the figures were 47.8% and 35.7%, respectively. In a similar way, in Venezuela, these figures were 23.3% and 12.2%; in Israel, 25.4% and 9.1%; in Japan, 0.2% and in no case among women; in France, 22.1% and 4.1%; in Germany, 10.3% and 1.4%; in Poland, 1.1% and 0.2%; in Sweden, 17.1% and 0.9%; in the United Kingdom, 3.5% and 0.6%; and in Spain, these figures amounted to 7.1% of men and 0.9% of women.

In relation to the mouth being the site of the gunshot, gender-based differences have also been noted. Among the suicides by shotgun registered in Istanbul, Asirdizer et al.13 found that men selected the mouth in 10.9% of the cases, with no case recorded in women, who opted for less visible areas such as the abdomen or, when it was to the head, the right temporal region. In contrast, in the extensive series of 1200 firearm-related suicides analysed by Stone,14 5.11% of the women chose the mouth, while men did so in 4.87% of the cases.

The different series consulted are consistent in terms of the higher age of those committing suicide compared with homicide victims, showing the following figures (mean age at suicide/homicide): 47/38, 49/30, 36/23, 39/34 and 51/34 years of age.9,15–18

Site of the incidents

Suicides are often committed, as might be expected by the voluntary and personal nature of the act, at home, considering as such the interior and surrounding property of the same. This is predominately true in the series of Karlsson,18 of Fedakar et al.,19 and of Thomsen et al.,20 (60.6%, 60.5% and in 72% of cases, respectively).

Type of firearm

If in firearm-related suicides there is a relative predominance of the use of long guns (shotguns) versus handguns (pistols or revolvers), the use of the latter stands out clearly in homicides (Table 1). In accidents, however, the data are limited. In an analysis of the latter by Thomsen,20 in the four cases referred to, a short gun was used, and all in the context of Russian roulette; although the ultimate motive (i.e., whether accidental or suicidal) of these cases is a source of debate.21,22

Table 1.

Gun preferentially used in the different aetiologies of firearm-related death.

Study  Suicides  Homicides  Accidents  Population 
Frei et al.2  Handgun  Handgun    Basel (Switzerland), 1992–1996 
Druid10  Shotgun 46%  Shotgun 53%
Unknown 44% 
  Linköping (Sweden), 1975–1996 
Aznak et al.16    Handgun 87.5%    Istanbul (Turkey), 1991–1995 
Karlsson18  Shotgun 35%
Handgun 32% 
Handgun 42%    Stockholm (Sweden), 1983–1995 
Fedakar et al.19  Handgun 54.9%  Handgun 61%  Shotgun 40%  Turkey, 1993–2003 
Thomsen and Albrektsen20  Shotgun 50%  Handgun 44%  Handgun 100%  Denmark, 1984–1987 
Molina et al.24  Handgun 76%  Handgun 74.4%    Bexar County (Texas), 1988–2004 
Rouse and Dunn25  Shotgun 58.13%  Shotgun 54.79%    London, 1981–1991 
Desinan and Mazzolo27  Shotgun 42.42%  Handgun 58.33%    Udine (Italy), 1992–2202 
Sutton et al.28  Shotgun 78.9%      England and Wales, 2000–2001 
Kohlmeier et al.29  Handgun:
76.1% men
87.4 women 
    San Antonio (Texas), 1984–1998 
Avis30  Shotgun 60.9%      Newfoundland (Canada), 1986–1993 
Jeffery et al.42  Rifle 50%  Handgun 68.2%    Sydney, 1994–2003 
Rancic et al.43    Handgun    Belgrade (Serbia), 1987, 1991, 1997, 2007 
Kastanaki et al.44  Shotgun 66.7%      Crete, 1999–2007 
Azmak et al.45  Handgun 50%  Handgun 63.8%  Handgun 75%  Edirne (Turkey), 1984–1997 
Balci et al.46  Handgun 52.3%      Turkey, 1991–2000 
Karger et al.47  Handgun 59.50%  Handgun 64.84%    Münster, Hamburg (Germany), 1967–1997 
Morrow and Hudson48      Shotgun 41%
Handgun 39% 
North Carolina, 1976–1980 

In India, as in other developing countries, there is a prevalence of the use of illegally manufactured firearms (Kumar et al.23).

The ways in which the type of firearm used may influence the choice of mouth for suicide have been highlighted by several authors (Table 2), with the use of shotguns being more frequent. With regard to homicides, in the study by Molina et al.,24 2% of gunshot wounds to the head were intraoral when the firearm used was a pistol, and 5% when it was a shotgun, with no case recorded with the use of rifle.

Table 2.

Intraoral option by type of gun.

Study  Shotgun  Rifle  Handgun  Population 
Stone14  6.22%4.46%  Texas 
Eisele et al.15  17%  11%  7%  Seattle, 1976–1978 
Molina et al.24  51%  32%  23%  Bexar County (Texas), 1988–2004 
Kohlmeier et al.29  31.7%  24.3%  14.5%  San Antonio (Texas), 1984–1998 
Avis30  10.25%  35%  100% head (20% intraoral)  Newfoundland (Canada), 1986–1993 
Number of shots

In suicides, the number of shots fired is almost always one, with more cases of intraoral wounds due to their immediate and devastating effects.

This has been shown in different series on suicides,11,19,25,26 with a single shot in more than 90% of cases in all of them, which only happens between 48% and 58% of the time in homicides. While studying 120 deaths by this method, Cina17 found no multiple gunshot wounds in suicides or accidental deaths, compared with 33% among those in homicides.

In the following table (Table 3), the single-shot frequency is recorded in the context of a medical/legal etiology.

Table 3.

Single-shot frequency.

Study  Suicides  Homicides  Period 
Karger et al.11  94.36%  46.07%  1967–1997 
Fedakar et al.19  98.14%  48.37%  1999–2003 
Rouse and Dunn25  97.67%  57.53%  1981–1991 
Grandmaison et al.26  90.3%  48.3%  1996–2005 
Entry wounds

The mouth is known to be one of the main sites of suicide-related gunshot wounds, generally the head11,17,20,24–32 and more specifically the forehead, mouth, submental triangle and fundamentally the right temple. Conversely, in deaths by homicide, the wounds are often multiple,33,34 with atypicality in the areas concerned indicated as being characteristic.33

In an analysis of firearm-related deaths in Bangkok, Suwanjutha32 points out that, although suicide-related gunshot wounds are located inside the mouth, in homicides they are found on the lips.

In general, in suicides the gun is placed in the mouth (intraoral gunshot) intentionally, to ensure a fatal outcome. In homicides, the shooting usually occurs at a distance greater than the point of contact35 (perioral gunshot) due to the victim's evasive reaction, unless the victim is asleep or unconscious (possible intraoral). The case mentioned by Polson et al.,33 in which a girl asked her friend to close her eyes and open her mouth, is illustrative here as a moment where a sure shot was taken. In addition, it must be considered that a mouth injury may merely be a further incidental one, as a result of multiple shots.

Accidental intraoral shots would be found almost exclusively in known cases of Russian roulette, referred to above.

Many studies record gunshots to the mouth depending on the different medical/legal aetiologies (Table 4), although it should be noted that their results are not homogeneous, as some are limited to one type of firearm or a specific anatomical location (head, neck), and the estimates are made on the total number of wounds, often multiple in cases of homicide. All of this must be evaluated when comparing the results.

Table 4.

Intraoral shooting by etiology (percentage and number of cases compared with the total).

Study  Suicides  Homicides  Accidents  Note  Period  Reference population 
Druid10  25.11% (55/219)  4.34% (3/69)  6.66% (1/15)  Calculations on the total number of wounds  1975–1996  Linköping (Sweden) 
Karger et al.11  19.93% (61/306)  0.42% (3/700)    Calculations on the total number of wounds  1967–1997  Münster, Hamburg (Germany) 
Aşirdizer et al.13  6.84% (5/73)      Study on shotguns  1998–2007  Istanbul (Turkey) 
Stone14  4.91% (59/1200)          Texas 
Eisele et al.15  8.96% (20/223)        1976–1978  Seattle 
Cina et al.17  16%  0%  0%  Study limited to head    New Mexico, South Carolina 
Thomseny Albrektsen20  32.62% (77/236)  0% (0/61)  0% (0/4)    1984–1987  Denmark 
Rouse and Dunn25  27.90% (12/43)  0% (0/73)      1981–1991  London 
De la Grandmaison et al.26  30.55% (22/72)  1.66% (1/60)    Study on long guns  1996–2005  Garches (France) 
Denisan and Mazzolo 27  45.45% (15/33)  0% (0/12)      1992–2002  Udine (Italy) 
Sutton et al.28  36.2%/21/58)        2000–2001  England and Wales 
Kohlmeier et al.29  17.34% (293/1689)        1984–1998  San Antonio (Texas) 
Avis30  18.75% (12/64)        1986–1993  Newfoundland (Canada) 
Karlsson et al.31  31.03% (27/87)  0% (0/41)  0% (0/1)    1980–1981, 1990–1991  Stockholm (Sweden) 
Suwanjutha32  3.50% (2/57)  4.41% (3/68)    Study limited to head and neck  1983–1986  Bangkok 
Amiri et al.49  3.03% (1/33)  0% (0/107)  0% (0/5)    2002–2003  Tehran 
Bullet trajectory

In an autopsy, the importance of determining a bullet's trajectory in the mouth has been emphasised. Classic in this regard are the papers by Fatteh34,36 describing how in suicides the firearm is pointed upward towards the hard palate or pharynx, unlike in homicides, where the trajectory is horizontal.

In several studies, the statistics consulted match this upward, anteroposterior trajectory in suicides, such as the study by Denisan and Mazzolo,27 where 14 of 15 intraoral gunshot wounds were consistent with this, as well as in 21 of the 22 of those recorded by Grandmaison et al.,26 55 of 59 of those recorded by Karger et al.,11 and 51 of 53 of those recorded by Druid.10

With regard to homicides, the most common references available are those with an upward intraoral direction, although the cases reported are few and thus lack significance. In the study by Grandmaison et al.,26 the only homicide recorded with a mouth gunshot wound showed an upward trajectory, as was the case in 2 of the 3 homicides described by Karger et al.11 or by Druid,10 or in the 3 cases analysed by Zietlow and Hawley.37 It must be taken into account that this trajectory is unique to intraoral gunshot wounds, unlike perioral ones, which are executed from a greater distance.

The table shows the direction of the bullet in relation to the different aetiologies (Table 5).

Table 5.

Bullet trajectory in the different aetiologies.

Author  Suicides  Homicides  Accidents 
Druid10  Upward: 51
Downward: 1
Parallel: 1 
Upward: 2
Downward: 1 
Upward: 1 
Karger et al.11  Upward: 55
Parallel: 3
Downward: 1 
Upward: 2
Downward: 1 
 
Grandmaison et al.26
(on long guns) 
Upward: 21
Downward: 1 
Upward: 1   
Desinan and Mazzolo27  Upward: 14
Parallel: 1 
   
Zietlow and Hawley37    Upward: 3   
Mouth injuries

An important aspect of an autopsy is to differentiate between the injuries caused directly by the bullet in its trajectory and those attributable to combustible gases or even the sudden movement of the barrel in the mouth, in the case of lip contusions due to the sight of the firearm in its recoil.33

The study of wounds requires a careful examination of the oral cavity, which is sometimes technically complicated by rigour mortis and an obscure view of the area caused by the injuries themselves and even the lack of a suitable lighting system in the autopsy room. To make a careful examination, access to the mouth has been advocated through the neck33; the use of complementary techniques is also recommended, such as CT38 for charred corpses, or a normal X-ray34,39 with an added indication when the ammunition used was slugs or buckshot.

Other authors, in order to circumvent rigour mortis in the area, have proposed gaining access to the mouth through bilateral incisions made in the retromandibular region.40

In intraoral suicides, the victim lowers the tongue to be able to fit the barrel deep into the mouth, owing to which the bullet does not pass through it, although it may be affected by the effect of the gases or the flame, with tears and burns, as well as bruises on the lips, being common.

Conversely, in homicides the victim will instinctively put the tongue up, and so the bullet pierces it, in addition to damaging the lips and teeth when the shot comes from outside the mouth, which does not occur in suicides. This is evidenced in a homicide noted by Fatteh36 in which the bullet clearly pierced the tongue; or in 6 of the 8 cases described by Azmak et al.,16 where the bullet penetrated a higher plane in the other 2 cases.

There is therefore a need to closely examine the lips, teeth and tongue in deaths of this type.

In addition, mouth injuries are generally highly destructive, in relation to the type of firearm and ammunition used. In intraoral gunshot wounds, which make up the majority of cases, the bullet's direct impact combines with the effects of cavitation and combustible gases that act on a closed cavity, with severe effects on the base of the skull and other craniofacial structures such as the jaw being habitual. In relation to the exit wound, occipital or parietal fractures are common, depending on the bullet's trajectory, usually anteroposterior, following the midline, or with a slight leftward deviation in right-handed subjects. The hard palate may show the wound confirming the bullet's trajectory.

If the shot was horizontal or with a downward trajectory, the cervical vertebrae may be injured directly, without affecting the palate. In this regard, Fatteh36 points out that death in suicides is due to direct brain damage, whereas in homicides, with the bullet's cervical exit, death can be related to blood invading the respiratory tract.

Sometimes the bullet does not exit the head (absence of exit wound), while losing part of its energy after passing through the bony structures,33 but always in relation to the type of firearm and ammunition used. In practice, it is common to observe, in suicide-related gunshot wounds with buckshot, severe destruction in the anterior cranial-facial plane, with no exit hole.

On other occasions during the autopsy, the bullet is located under the scalp, which it was not able to pass through, even with numerous fractures in the cranial vault. This has been reported precisely as a difference between the use of 12- or 20-gauge ammunition, which with the former the bullet perforates the scalp; this is assumed to occur in less than 10% of cases with the use of the lower gauge.41

Case reports

Below, 6 cases are presented, selected from medical/forensic archives, corresponding to different aetiologies and types of firearm, which illustrate some of the characteristics mentioned.

Case 1

Distance: intraoral. Direction: markedly caudocranial and slightly anteroposterior. Exit: anterior interparietal. Etiology: suicide. Type of firearm: presumably handgun (not listed).

30-Year-old man, transferred to a hospital, dying of complications due to infection. There was a pronounced upward and slightly posterior trajectory, following the midline with a slight deviation to the right. There was a clear wound in the palate (Fig. 1), crossing the right anterior cerebral fossa.

Figure 1.

Perforation of the palate (case 1, suicide).

(0.18MB).
Case 2

Distance: intraoral. Direction: caudocranial and anteroposterior, with slight deviation to the left. Exit: posterior interparietal, slightly to the left. Etiology: suicide. Type of firearm: 38-calibre handgun.

68-Year-old man with serious money problems shot himself on a public road. The gun remained alongside the body. The autopsy showed a single shot, with lip wounds and burns on the tongue and palate. The bullet passed through the latter in its posterior half and the sella turcica at its midline.

Case 3

Distance: short distance (perioral). Direction: anteroposterior, slightly caudocranial and to the right. Exit: right posterior cervical. Etiology: homicide. Type of firearm: handgun.

25-Year-old woman. No information about the site of the incident. Single shot in the mouth with large wound on the lower lip, avulsion of lower teeth and tongue traversed longitudinally by the bullet (Figs. 2 and 3). Fracture of transverse processes of vertebrae C3 and C4 with exit wound 14×12mm in size split in two by a small cutaneous effraction (Fig. 4). Death due to vertebral artery injury with bronchoaspiration and spinal cord injury.

Figure 2.

Dental avulsion and lip injuries (case 3, homicide).

(0.33MB).
Figure 3.

Bullet's trajectory through the tongue (case 3, homicide).

(0.34MB).
Figure 4.

Cervical exit wound (case 3, homicide).

(0.55MB).
Case 4

Distance: intraoral. Direction: anteroposterior, following the midline in a horizontal trajectory. Exit: cervical. Etiology: suicide. Type of firearm: handgun (9mm).

52-Year-old man on antidepressants. Suicide at the workplace. The body remained in a seated position, leaning forward, with the firearm on the floor. Anterior extrusion of the upper incisors. The bullet passed under the posterior edge of the foramen magnum, fracturing the posterior arch of the atlas (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Anterior dental extrusion, lip contusions (case 4, suicide).

(0.26MB).
Case 5

Distance: intraoral. Direction: markedly caudocranial and slightly anteroposterior. Exit: no exit wound. Etiology: suicide. Type of firearm: shotgun (buckshot).

Man with no relevant history, with single shot in a fenced enclosure (plot). The shotgun was placed between the legs, with the barrel gripped in one hand. The examination showed an intraoral gunshot wound, with panfacial fracture, damage to the anterior and middle cranial fossa, destruction of the palate and an irregularly sectioned tongue. In the endocranium, there were marks caused by the impact of the buckshot (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Impact of buckshot on endocranium (case 5, suicide).

(0.56MB).
Case 6

Distance: intraoral. Direction: anteroposterior, very slightly caudocranial and to the left. Exit: left occipitoparietal. Etiology: suicide. Type of firearm: shotgun (single bullet).

40-Year-old man, found at his home with the firearm next to his body. History of depression. The autopsy showed injuries caused by single shot, with contusions on the lips (Fig. 7), tears in the lingual posterior third and burns on the pharynx, larynx and tongue, more severe on the left side (Fig. 8). Palate crossed at the posterior third, with extensive facial fractures and cranial fracture.

Figure 7.

Burns on the tongue (case 6, suicide).

(0.63MB).
Figure 8.

Burns on the tongue and larynx (case 6, suicide).

(0.47MB).
Conclusions

Several variables have been suggested for differentiating the causes of firearm-related deaths by homicide and suicide, some referring specifically to mouth injuries.

The victim's being male, the home as the site of the incident, the use of a long gun and a single shot fired are characteristic features of suicide with a firearm. In intraoral wounds, the bullet usually follows an anteroposterior and bottom-to-top (caudocranial) trajectory, passing through the palate, without directly damaging the teeth, lips and tongue, although they are damaged by other elements of the gunshot wound.

In homicides, by contrast, these results are more variable, with the use of handguns and multiple shots being common. In rare intraoral cases, the bullet may directly injure the lips and teeth, passing through the tongue in its trajectory.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Pathology Department at the Legal Medicine Institute of Alicante. Dr Sandostatin García and Dr Miguel Ángel Castillo.

References
[1]
J.T. Briggs, A. Tabarrok.
Firearms and suicides in US states.
Int Rev Law Econ, 37 (2014), pp. 180-188
[2]
A. Frei, A. Han, M.G. Weiss, V. Dittmann, V. Ajdacic-Gross.
Use of army weapons and private firearms for suicide and homicide in the region of Basel, Switzerland.
Crisis, 27 (2006), pp. 140-146
[3]
S. Kegler, J. Mercy.
Firearm Homicides and suicides in mayor metropolitan areas – United States 2006–2007 and 2009–2010.
MMWR, 62 (2013), pp. 597-602
[4]
Fleitas Ortiz de las Rozas D. Homicidios y suicidios en Argentina. Asociación para Políticas Públicas, Documento de trabajo. 2014 [consulted 02 Jan 2016]: Available in: http://www.app.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Homicidios-y-Suicidios-en-Argentina-2014.pdf.
[5]
T. Ojima, Y. Nakamura, Detels R. Comparative.
Study about methods of suicide between Japan and the United States.
J Epidemiol, 14 (2004), pp. 187-192
[6]
M. He, Y.X. Fang, J.Y. Lin, K.J. Ma, B.X. Li.
Unnatural deaths in Shanghai from 2000 to 2009: a retrospective study of forensic autopsy cases at the Shanghai Public Security Bureau.
PLoS One, 10 (2015), pp. e0131309
[7]
Instituto Anatómico Forense de Madrid. Memorias de los años 2008 a 2014.
[8]
L. Miguel, J. Lucena, F. Heredia, A. Rico, R. Marín, M. Blanco, et al.
Epidemiological study of suicide in Seville in 2004.
Cuad Med Forense, 11 (2005), pp. 43-53
[9]
A. Verzeletti, P. Astorri, F. DeFerrari.
Firearm-related deaths in Brescia (Northern Italy) between 1994 and 2006: a retrospective study.
J Forensic Leg Med, 16 (2009), pp. 325-331
[10]
H. Druid.
Site of entrance wound and direction of bullet path in firearm fatalities as indicators of homicide versus suicide.
Forensic Sci Int, 88 (1997), pp. 147-162
[11]
B. Karger, E. Billeb, E. Koops, B. Brinkmann.
Autopsy features relevant for discrimination between suicidal and homicidal gunshot injuries.
Int J Legal Med, 116 (2002), pp. 273-278
[12]
V. Ajdacic-Gross, M.G. Weiss, M. Ring, U. Hepp, M. Bopp, F. Gutzwiller, et al.
Methods of suicide: international suicide patterns derived from the WHO mortality database.
Bull World Health Organ, 86 (2008), pp. 726-732
[13]
M. Aşirdizer, G. Cantürk, N. Cantürk, M.S. Yavuz, H. Sari.
Analyses of suicidal deaths with shotguns in Istanbul, 1998–2007.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 16 (2010), pp. 47-53
[14]
I.C. Stone.
Characteristics of firearms and gunshot wounds as markers of suicide.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 13 (1992), pp. 275-280
[15]
J.W. Eisele, D.T. Reay, A. Cook.
Sites of suicidal gunshot wounds.
J Forensic Sci, 26 (1981), pp. 480-485
[16]
D. Azmak, G. Altun, S. Bilgi, A. Yilmaz.
Firearm fatalities in Edirne, 1984–1997.
Forensic Sci Int, 95 (1998), pp. 231-239
[17]
S.J. Cina, M.E. Ward, M.A. Hopkins, C.A. Nichols.
Multifactorial analysis of firearm wounds to the head with attention to anatomic location.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 20 (1999), pp. 109-115
[18]
T. Karlsson.
Multivariate analysis (’forensiometrics’) – a new tool in forensic medicine. Differentiation between firearm-related homicides and suicides.
Forensic Sci Int, 101 (1999), pp. 131-140
[19]
R1 Fedakar, U.N. Gündoğmuş.
Türkmen Firearm-related deaths in two industrial cities of Turkey and their province.
N Leg Med (Tokyo), 9 (2007), pp. 14-21
[20]
J.L. Thomsen, S.B. Albrektsen.
An investigation of the pattern of firearms fatalities before and after the introduction of new legislation in Denmark.
Med Sci Law, 31 (1991), pp. 162-166
[21]
C. Barber, D. Hemenway.
Too many or too few unintentional firearm deaths in official U. S. mortality data?.
Accid Anal Prevent, 43 (2011), pp. 724-731
[22]
L.B. Shields, J.C. Hunsaker 3rd, D.M. Stewart.
Russian roulette and risk-taking behavior: a medical examiner study.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 29 (2008), pp. 32-39
[23]
A. Kumar, R. Sachan, A. Verma.
Medico-legal evaluation of firearm injuries – an original study from India with review of literature.
J Forensic Sci, 60 (2015), pp. S83-S86
[24]
D.K. Molina, V. DiMaio, R. Cave.
Gunshot wounds: a review of firearm type, range, and location as pertaining to manner of death.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 34 (2013), pp. 366-371
[25]
D. Rouse, L. Dunn.
Firearm fatalities.
Forensic Sci Int, 56 (1992), pp. 59-66
[26]
G.L. de la Grandmaison, C. Fermanian, P. Aegerter, M. Durigon.
Influence of ballistic and autopsy parameters on the manner of death in case of long firearms fatalities.
Forensic Sci Int, 177 (2008), pp. 207-213
[27]
L. Desinan, G.M. Mazzolo.
Gunshot fatalities: suicide, homicide or accident? A series of 48 cases.
Forensic Sci Int, 17 (2005), pp. S37-S44
[28]
L. Sutton, K. Hawton, S. Simkin, P. Turnbull, N. Kapur, O. Bennewith, et al.
Gunshot suicides in England. A multicentre study based on coroners’ records.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol, 40 (2005), pp. 324-328
[29]
R.E. Kohlmeier, C.A. McMahan, V.J. DiMaio.
Suicide by firearms: a 15-year experience.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 22 (2001), pp. 337-340
[30]
S.P. Avis.
Suicidal gunshot wounds.
Forensic Sci Int, 67 (1994), pp. 41-47
[31]
T. Karlsson, B. Isaksson, K. Ormstad.
Gunshot fatalities in Stockholm, Sweden with special reference to the use of illegal weapons.
J Forensic Sci, 38 (1993), pp. 1409-1421
[32]
T. Suwanjutha.
Direction, site and the muzzle target distance of bullet in the head and neck at close range as an indication of suicide or homicide.
Forensic Sci Int, 37 (1988), pp. 223-229
[33]
C.J. Polson, D.J. Gee, B. Knight.
The essentials of forensic medicine.
4th ed, Pergamon Press, (1985),
[34]
A. Fatteh.
Handbook of forensic pathology.
1st ed, Lipincott, (1973),
[35]
A.S. Taylor.
Taylor's principles and practice of medical jurisprudence, 13th ed.,
[36]
A. Fatteh.
Homicidal gunshot wound of mouth.
J Forensic Sci Soc, 12 (1972), pp. 347-349
[37]
C. Zietlow, D.A. Hawley.
Unexpectedly homicide: three intraoral gunshot wounds.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 14 (1993), pp. 230-233
[38]
R. Sano, S. Hirawasa, S. Kobayashi, T. Shimada, S. Awata, H. Takei, et al.
Use of posmortem computed tomography to reveal an intraoral gunshot injuries in a charred body.
Leg Med (Tokyo), 13 (2011), pp. 286-288
[39]
H. Asamura, K. Takayanagi, L. Chunyan, M. Ota, H. Fukushima.
The judgment of a gunshot wound with severe post-mortem changes.
Leg Med (Tokyo), 1 (1999), pp. 185-187
[40]
O.F. Heit, R.F. Silva, A. Franco.
Improving traditional dental autopsies in posmortem examinations of intraoral gunshot wounds.
J Forensic Leg Med, 23 (2014), pp. 87-90
[41]
R.C. Harruff.
Comparison of contact shotgun wounds of the head produced by different gauge shotguns.
J Forensic Sci, 40 (1995), pp. 801-804
[42]
A. Jeffery, B. Hulewicz, N. Langlois, D. Little, P. Ellis.
Firearm fatalities in Western Sydney 1994–2003.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol, 3 (2007), pp. 252-257
[43]
N. Rancic, M. Erceg, N. Radojevic, S. Savic.
Medicolegal characteristics of firearm homicides in Belgrade, Serbia: before, during, and after the war in the Former Yugoslavia.
J Forensic Sci, 58 (2013), pp. 1549-1553
[44]
A.E. Kastanaki, E.F. Kranioti, A. Papavdi, P.N. Theodorakis, M. Michalodimitrakis.
Suicide by firearms on the island of Crete: a 9-year record.
[45]
D. Azmak, G. Altun, S. Koç, C. Yorulmaz, A. Ozaslan.
Intra- and perioral shooting fatalities.
Forensic Sci Int, 101 (1999), pp. 217-227
[46]
Y. Balci, G. Canogullari, E. Ulupinar.
Characterization of the gunshot suicides.
J Forensic Leg Med, 14 (2007), pp. 203-208
[47]
L. Marín-León, M.B. Barros.
Suicide mortality: gender and socioeconomic differences.
Rev Saude Publica, 37 (2003), pp. 357-363
[48]
P.L. Morrow, P. Hudson.
Accidental firearm fatalities in North Carolina: 1976–1980.
Am J Public Health, 76 (1986), pp. 1120
[49]
A. Amiri, H. Sanaei-Zadeh, H. Towfighi Zavarei, F. Rezvani Ardestani, N. Savoji.
Firearm fatalities. A preliminary study report from Iran.
J Clin Forensic Med, 10 (2003), pp. 159-163

Please cite this article as: Dorado-Fernández E, Andreu-Tena E, Magaña-Loarte C, Ruiz-Tagle Fernández E, Cáceres-Monllor D, Souto López-Mosquera JL, et al. Muertes por arma de fuego y disparo intraoral: etiología medicolegal. Rev Esp Med Legal. 2017;43:70–78.

Copyright © 2016. Asociación Nacional de Médicos Forenses
Article options
Tools