Buscar en
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española (English Edition) Psychological Changes in Morbidly Obese Patients After Sleeve Gastrectomy
Journal Information
Vol. 92. Issue 6.
Pages 404-409 (June - July 2014)
Visits
3271
Vol. 92. Issue 6.
Pages 404-409 (June - July 2014)
Original article
Full text access
Psychological Changes in Morbidly Obese Patients After Sleeve Gastrectomy
Evolución psicológica de los pacientes afectos de obesidad mórbida intervenidos mediante una gastrectomía tubular
Visits
...
Yolanda Meleroa,??
Corresponding author
, José Vicente Ferrerb, Ángel Sanahujab, Lydia Amadora, Denise Hernandoa
a Clínica Obésitas, Hospital 9 de Octubre, Valencia, Spain
b Bariatric & Metabolic, Clínica Obésitas, Hospital 9 de Octubre, Valencia, Spain
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (8)
Table 1.
Table 2.
Table 3. EDI-1.
Table 4. EDI-1.
Table 5. BSQ.
Table 6. SF-36.
Table 7. SF-36.
Table 8. QLI-SP.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Background

The aim of this study is to observe the psychological changes at one-year postop in a group of patients undergoing laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (GVL) and multidisciplinary follow-up.

Methods

A total of 46 patients with a BMI-35 or higher, who were selected for GVL, completed psychological testing. After GVL surgery, patients received psychological, nutritional, and medical attention during 12 months, and they retook the same tests.

Results

Psychological tests showed an improvement on almost all scales tested, except perfectionism. The most significant change was in the benchmark for Eating Disorders with an improvement of 89% for bulimia (P<.01), and 55% for body dissatisfaction (P<.01) and ineffectiveness (P<.01). In quality of life there was an improvement of 57% in the change in health status (P<.01).

Conclusion

During our study, a protocol involving GVL and multidisciplinary follow-ups proved to be an effective intervention for improving bulimic symptoms and quality of living. The results of these psychological changes are similar to Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass but different to vertical banded gastroplasty or adjustable gastric band, according to previous studies. However, long-term studies are necessary to confirm this trend.

Keywords:
Sleeve gastrectomy
Quality of life
Eating disorders
Bulimia
Resumen
Introducción

El objetivo del estudio es observar la evolución psicológica en un grupo de pacientes intervenidos mediante gastrectomía vertical laparoscópica (GVL) y tras un año de seguimiento multidisciplinar.

Métodos

Un total de 46 pacientes con un IMC de 35 o superior completaron las pruebas psicológicas antes de la cirugía, y volvieron a cumplimentar dichas pruebas al año de la GVL (tras un seguimiento médico, nutricional y psicológico).

Resultados

Se observó una mejoría en todas las escalas analizadas, excepto el perfeccionismo. Los cambios más significativos se refieren al área de sintomatología alimentaria, con una mejora del 89% en bulimia (p<0,01), y un 55% en insatisfacción corporal (p<0,01) e ineficacia (p<0,01). Por otra parte, en el área de calidad de vida cabe destacar una mejoría del 57% en el cambio de salud (p<0,01).

Conclusión

La GVL con un seguimiento multidisciplinar se confirma como una intervención efectiva para mejorar los síntomas bulímicos y la calidad de vida. Estos resultados son similares a los recogidos en diferentes estudios con bypass gástrico, y no tanto a otros con gastroplastia vertical anillada y banda gástrica ajustable. Sin embargo, son necesarios estudios a largo plazo para confirmar esta tendencia.

Palabras clave:
Tubo gástrico
Calidad de vida
Trastornos de la conducta alimentaria
Bulimia
Full Text
Introduction

In this study, we present the preliminary results obtained in a group of patients operated on by vertical laparoscopic gastrectomy (VLG) and multidisciplinary monitoring (medical, nutritional and psychological). Our interest is to show the psychological changes of a group of patients treated with this technique, quantified by the results of a series of psychological tests performed before and one year after the operation. This type of study has already been performed in patients undergoing gastric bypass (GBP),1–15 vertical banded gastroplasty,10 or both surgeries.16,17 Other studies simply address bariatric surgery without specifying the technique used.1,18–27 We only found 2 articles comparing psychological improvement between VLG and laparoscopic adjustable gastric band.28,29

Most of the reasons given by patients at the time of surgery, and listed in preoperative psychological tests, deal with significant reductions in quality of life,1,6,9,16–20,23 body-image dissatisfaction and loss of control over body weight and food intake.2–7,17,20,30

Furthermore, we believe that VLG has important emotional implications regarding nutrition, because it is a very restrictive surgical procedure, associated with a strong decrease in ghrelin.31 Therefore, we decided to evaluate these variables (quality of life and eating symptomatology) in order to verify the suitability of VLG.

Patients and Methods

Before recommending VLG surgery, patients are studied based on a comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment. We indicate this intervention for patients with a BMI of 35–40 (in special cases, up to 50). We use factors with a greater VLG outcome possibility: sweet-eaters, having a family history of morbid obesity (more than 2 obese members in first and second generation), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular and musculoskeletal limitations for exercising after surgery. When patients meet 3 or more of these circumstances, they are advised to undergo GBP surgery.

Psychological Study

Days before the surgery and after performing a complete psychological case history, patients complete a series of self-administered tests (either online or on paper): Edinburgh bulimia test32 (BITE); body shape questionnaire33 (BSQ); SF-36 health questionnaire34; quality of life index35 (QLI-SP); and eating disorder inventory36 (EDI-1) (Tables 1 and 2).

Body Shape Questionnaire33 (BSQ)  Self-administered Test Measuring Typical Concern about Body Weight and Shape Caused by Bulimia and Anorexia Nervosa 
Eating Disorders Inventory36 (EDI-1)  Self-administered Questionnaire to Detect The Presence of Eating Disorders 
Obsession with thinness  Excessive attention to concerns about weight, diet, and weight regain fear 
Bulimia  Binge eating and purging episodes 
Body dissatisfaction  Dissatisfaction with physical appearance 
Inefficiency  Feelings of inadequacy, insecurity, powerlessness and lack of control over one's life 
Perfectionism  Dissatisfaction with everything that is not considered perfect 
Interpersonal distrust  Reluctance regarding intimate and close relationships 
Introspective awareness  Ability to discriminate sensations, emotions and sensations of hunger and satiety 
Fear of maturity  Fear of facing adult life demands 
Health Questionnaire34 (SF-36)  Test That Explores 8 Aspects of Health Status 
Physical function  Degree of limitation to perform physical activity 
Physical role  Extent to which physical health interferes with work and other daily activities 
Pain  Pain intensity and its effect on normal work, both inside and outside the home 
Health  Personal health assessment, including current health, expectations of future health and disease resistance 
Vitality  Sense of energy and vitality to face fatigue and exhaustion 
Social function  Limitations in normal social functioning due to physical and emotional problems 
Mental Health  General mental health, including scales of depression, anxiety, behavior control and general wellness 
Emotional role  Extent to which emotional problems interfere with work and daily activities 
Quality of life index35 (QLI-SP)  Brief instrument measuring quality of life in terms of satisfaction 

After surgery, patients undergo individualized, dietary, nutritional and psychological monthly (for the first 6 months) and bimonthly medical monitoring with cognitive behavioral intervention. At 12 months, a psychometric reassessment (same test protocol) is performed.

Surgical Technique

VLG is always performed by the same surgery and anesthesia team. We perform the gastrectomy using a 32 FR probe, from 4cm of the pylorus to the angle of Hiss using an ENDO GIA echelon flex and applying the “dog ear” technical variant. We perform a reinforcement Lembert invaginant suture along the entire staple line. Patients are treated with an enhanced postoperative recovery program: sitting after 2h, walking after 3h, liquid food after 5h and accompanied by breathing exercises. Hospital stay is for 48h.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 11 package. Data are shown as mean±standard deviation (SD). For comparisons of the psychological test results before and one year after surgery, we used the related samples Wilcoxon signed test. The differences in weight and BMI were compared using the unpaired Student's test. P-values below .05 were considered significant.

Results

The study included all patients who underwent VLG and completed the psychological pre- and postoperative tests (at one year). We studied a total of 46 patients, of whom 36 were women and 10 were men. Mean age was 37 years. Initial mean BMI was 43±5, and at 12 months it was 29±3 (P<.001). All surgeries were performed laparoscopically with no conversions or re-surgery, or readmission within 30 days. No leaks were observed. There were 2 cases of postoperative hemorrhage, successfully treated conservatively. Mean hospital stay was 2.1 days. There was no mortality.

The preliminary tests yielded very high scores in body concern (BSQ test: 110.50, where a mean for all women is normally 81.5); also high scores in the EDI-1 test, and the variable in body dissatisfaction (17.11, exceeded 16, which is the cutoff limit). There was also a significant effect on three of the scales of the SF-36: vitality, health and health change, with scores of 49.35, 53.37 and 38.59 respectively (on a scale of 0–100).

Regarding the completed questionnaires 12 months later, an improvement is observed in all the analyzed scales, except perfectionism.

Examining the 12-month results in detail, we observed the most remarkable change in the variables that refer to eating disorders (assessed by EDI-1), with statistically significant improvement (P<.01) in bulimia, body dissatisfaction, ineffectiveness, obsession with thinness and introspective awareness (Tables 3 and 4). In the same food area, but with a different test (BSQ), we also found a significant improvement (P<.01) in body concern (Table 5).

Table 3.

EDI-1.

  Obsession with thinness  Bulimia  Body dissatisfaction  Inefficiency 
Preoperative  6.41  1.96  17.11  4.35 
After 12 months  4.17  0.22  7.24  1.98 
Improvement  2.24  1.74  9.87  2.37 
34.92  88.89  57.69  54.50 
P  <.01**  <.01**  <.01**  <.01** 
**

Very significant outcome.

Table 4.

EDI-1.

  Perfectionism  Interpersonal distrust  Introspective awareness  Fear of maturity 
Preoperative  4.09  3.20  4.02  5.02 
After 12 months  4.52  2.33  2.54  3.63 
Improvement  −0.43  0.87  1.48  1.39 
−10.64  27.21  36.76  27.71 
P  >.05  >.05  <.05*  <.05* 
*

Significant outcome.

Table 5.

BSQ.

  Body concern 
Preoperative  110.50 
After 12 months  73.26 
Improvement  37.24 
33.70 
P  <.01** 
**

Very significant outcome.

Quality of life was assessed by the SF-36 test, yielding clearly significant improvement (P<.01) in all the variables (emphasizing health, physical functioning, and vitality), except 3 variables with lower significance (P<.05): social functioning, body pain and emotional role (Tables 6–8).

Table 6.

SF-36.

  Mental health  Emotional role  Vitality  General health  Health change 
Preoperative  61.22  78.98  49.35  53.37  38.59 
After 12 months  75.30  86.95  72.39  79.78  89.46 
Improvement  14.09  7.97  23.04  26.41  50.87 
18.71  9.17  31.83  33.11  56.87 
P  <.01**  >.05  <.01**  <.01**  <.01** 
**

Very significant outcome.

Table 7.

SF-36.

  Physical function  Physical role  Pain  Social function 
Preoperative  67.61  73.37  69.64  76.47 
After 12 months  96.30  88.59  79.55  90.76 
Improvement  28.70  15.22  9.91  14.29 
29.80  17.18  12.46  15.75 
P  <.01**  <.05*  <.05*  <.05* 
*

Significant outcome.

**

Very significant outcome.

Table 8.

QLI-SP.

  Quality of life 
Pre-surgery  64.07 
12 months  80.73 
Improvement  16.67 
20.65 
P  <.01** 
**

Very significant outcome.

Discussion

Given the above results, we can conclude that a substantial decrease in BMI along with a virtual disappearance of eating disorder symptoms result in many of the patients experiencing major psychological changes with a great improvement in quality of life and self-perception of health. We infer that this is so because patients, in their daily lives, stop experiencing food compulsion, obsession with weight, body dissatisfaction, etc. And the physical limitations they were experiencing (low mobility, pain, difficulty falling into deep sleep, fatigue, low vitality, choking, etc.) virtually disappear. That is, psychologically, obsessions with their bodies, with food, diet, and physical fitness disappear; they are more agile and light. To this, we have to add increased self-esteem, perception of less external criticism by relatives, acquaintances and strangers. Thus, the changes experienced by patients at the time of the surgery affect most of these areas (quality of life, social relationships, eating disorders, self-esteem, and so on, to encompass most of the variables). The remarkable thing is that this study confirms the insight we have been getting over the years with patients undergoing VLG.

This fact might indicate to us the suitability of VLG with multidisciplinary follow-up as an effective protocol for treating morbidly obese patients who want to improve their quality of life, and their physical and mental health.

Comparing the preliminary results of our study, we observed that they concur with other parameters of quality of life,24,25 obsession with thinness,11 and partly with bingeing11,24,25 (since the average of the sample does not experience a high score, but a significant amount of its subjects do).

With respect to quality of life improvement, our results also agree with previous published studies on GBP, VGB, AGBL and VLG after 12 months.10,16–19,28,29 In our study, a marked improvement at the individual level (vitality, pain, physical function) is observed, yet less at the social level, as it appears in the Kozlowska Dziurowicz study at 6 months.16 This great improvement in quality of life is crucial, since this aspect is regarded as the true measure of the effectiveness of surgery.23

Moreover, the data gathered indicate a significant improvement in the psychological status of our patients, 12 months after the surgery. The strong decrease of bulimic symptoms is significant, with very positive development of other psychological aspects related to eating disorders.

These results agree with those obtained in GBP studies and their changes after 2 years2,4,7,9,19,25,26 and with AGB after 6 months,37 in which compulsive behaviors decreased dramatically. Additionally, no difference in weight loss among binge and non-binge eaters was found.

In contrast, in an 18 month study with VGB,30 increased presence of compulsive food symptoms was observed.

Therefore, from this data, we can infer that in the short to medium term (up to 2 years), both VLG and GBP tend to greatly improve preoperative bulimic symptoms, but not VGB or AGB.

However, after 2 years of bariatric surgery, and once the weight maintenance period is confronted, studies suggest that food compulsion increases in GBP.4,6,8,9,17 In the same line, there are some studies suggesting that the type of binge eating is a significant predictor of weight regain and persistent morbid obesity.4,13–16,27

It is likely that patients undergoing VLG have behavior more similar to GBP than to VGB or AGB.29 We hypothesize that this may be due, among other things, to fundus resection or defunctioning, with the consequent drop in ghrelin. Interestingly, our patients who underwent VLG surgery experience parallels between gastric capacity and emotional desire to eat (when the patient has a full stomach, he/she does not want to eat more), while with techniques such as AGB or VGB, fullness of the neo-stomach does not guarantee the disappearance of the desire to continue eating.

In our experience, this side effect occurs after some months in the vast majority of patients who underwent AGB, so that when they have filled their smaller stomach, they are not able, but do wish, to continue eating. Thus, patients end up acquiring messy habits, snacking as soon as they feel their stomach is empty, or taking high-calorie soft foods and liquids.

Contrary to the above, we found a paper showing no significant differences between VLG and AGB, with regard to quality of life and food wellness one year after surgery.28 We believe that this discrepancy may be due to the fact that we are actually measuring different types of variables.

We highlight the critical importance of a multidisciplinary team to help patients adapt to the major changes following surgery for obesity.17 And it is precisely through this multidisciplinary process that we achieve and promote a healthy lifestyle in the diversity of the patient's life aspects.14

It seems relevant to conduct further studies showing that the results of emotional and quality of life improvements obtained with VLG are similar to those obtained with GBP, and better than those obtained with VGB and AGB.

Finally, it seems important to note the 2 main limitations of our study: first, the sample size, and second, the short-term follow-up. Thus, studies are needed with a larger sample and for a longer term (5–10 years), since we have observed some patients failing to maintain their weight over time. Furthermore, we can gain from the detailed analysis more precise information about the effectiveness of our technique and the variables that may influence therapeutic failure, in order to improve the procedure's protocols.

VLG achieves very good results in terms of improving quality of life parameters and bulimic habits, although we consider essential the postoperative work of a multidisciplinary team that focused on achieving a good emotional relationship with food, enhancing control over it, and improving one's lifestyle.

Conflict of Interest

We, the authors, state that we are not receiving or have received any external funding for our research. Furthermore, there is no potential conflict of interest referring to this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Obésitas Clinic team, their patients and the Cirugía Española editorial team for the opportunity to publish this paper.

References
[1]
N. Barreto, O. Braghrolli, K. Lima, B. Eduarda Paneilli, C. Seal, D. Santos, et al.
Quality of life of obese patients submitted to bariatric surgery.
Obes Surg, 15 (2005), pp. 538-545
[2]
L.E. Bocchieri, E.Y. Chen, D. Munoz, S. Fischer, M. Dymek-Valentine, J.C. Alverdy, et al.
Pre-surgery binge eating status: effect on eating behaviour and weight outcome after gastric bypass.
Obes Surg, 16 (2006), pp. 1198-1204
[3]
S. Sogg.
Comprehensive interview assessment of eating behavior 18–35 months after gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity.
Surg Obes Relat Dis, 6 (2010), pp. 79-85
[4]
S. Fisher, E. Chen, S. Katterman, M. Raerhig, L. Bochierri-Ricciardi, D. Munoz, et al.
Emotional eating in a morbidly obese bariatric 135 surgery-seeking population.
Obes Surg, 17 (2007), pp. 996
[5]
M.A. Kalarchian, M.D. Marcus, G.T. Wilson, E.W. Labouvie, R.E. Brolin, L.B. LaMarca.
140 Binge eating among gastric bypass patients at log-term follow-up.
Obes Surg, 16 (2006), pp. 1198-1204
[6]
M. Kruseman, A. Leimgruber, F. Zumbach, A. Golay.
Dietary, weight, and psychological changes among patients with obesity, 8 years after gastric bypass.
Am J Surg, 199 (2010), pp. 183-188
[7]
J.D. Latner, S. Wetzler, E.R. Goodman, J. Glinski.
Gastric bypass in a low-income, inner-city population: eating disturbances and weight loss.
Obes Res, 12 (2004), pp. 956-961
[8]
S. Sanchez, F. Arias, J.J. Giorgojo, S. Sánchez.
Evolution of psychopathological alterations in patients with morbid obesity after bariatric surgery.
Med Clin (Barc), 133 (2009), pp. 206-212
[9]
B. Thonney, Z. Pataky, Badel, E. Bobbioni, A. Golay.
The relationship between weight loss and psychosocial functioning among bariatric surgery patients.
Am J Surg, 199 (2010), pp. 183-188
[10]
J. Ortega, R. Fernandez-Canet, S. Alvarez-Valdeita, N. Cassinello, M. Jose Baguena-Puigcerver.
Predictors of psychological symptoms in morbidly obese patients after gastric bypass surgery.
Surg Obes Relat Dis, (2011),
[11]
L. Lanza, M. Linda, I. Carrard, M. Reiner, A. Golay.
Psychological preparation for gastric bypass surgery.
Rev Med Suisse, 8 (2012), pp. 692-695
[12]
E. Ardelt-Gattinger, M. Meindl, H. Mangge, M. Neubauer, S. Ring-Dimitriou, J. Spendlingwimmer, et al.
Does bariatric surgery affect addiction to overeating and eating disorders?.
Chirurg, 83 (2012), pp. 561-567
[13]
N. Crowley, A. Budak, T.K. Byrne, S. Thomas.
Patients who endorse more binge eating triggers before gastric bypass lose less weight at 6 months.
Eur Eat Disord Rev, 20 (2012), pp. e91-e95
[14]
M. Livhits, C. Mercado, I. Yermilov, J.A. Parikh, E. Dutson, A. Mehran, et al.
Behavioral factors associated with successful weight loss after gastric bypass.
Am Surg, 76 (2010), pp. 1139-1142
[15]
M.D. Kofman, M.R. Lent, C. Swencionis.
Maladaptive eating patterns, quality of life, and weight outcomes following gastric bypass: results of an Internet survey.
Obesity (Silver Spring), 18 (2010), pp. 1938-1943
[16]
A. Dziurowicz-Kozlowska, W. Lisik, Z. Wierzbicki, M. Kosieradki.
Heath-related quality of life after surgical treatment of obesity.
Int J Obes, 31 (2007), pp. 299-307
[17]
E.M. Mathus-Vliegen.
Long-term health and psychosocial outcomes from surgically induced weigh loss: results obtained in patients not attending protocolled follow-up 150 visits.
J Physiol Pharmacol, 56 (2005), pp. 127-134
[18]
G.C. Van, S.K. Verschure, G.K. Van Hechk.
Psychosocial predictors of success following bariatric surgery.
Nutrs Hosp, 19 (2004), pp. 367-371
[19]
B. Cánovas, J. Sastre, G. Moreno, O. Llamazares, C. Familiar, S. Abad, et al.
Effect of a multidisciplinar protocol on the clinical results obtained after bariatric surgery.
Nutr Hosp, 26 (2011), pp. 116-121
[20]
Z. Pataky, I. Carrard, A. Golay.
Psychological factors and weight loss in bariatric surgery.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 27 (2011), pp. 167-173
[21]
R. Saunders.
Compulsive eating and gastric bypass surgery: what does hunger have to do with it?.
Obes Surg, 15 (2005), pp. 552-560
[22]
G.C. Van, C.M. Vreeswijk, G.L. Van Heck.
Bariatric surgery and bariatric psychology: evolution of the Dutch approach.
Int J Obes, 31 (2007), pp. 299-307
[23]
S. Weiner, S. Sauerland, M. Fein, R. Blanco, I. Pomhoff, R.A. Weiner.
The Bariatric Quality of Life index: a measure of well being in obesity surgery patients.
Obes Surg, 15 (2005), pp. 538-545
[24]
V. Abilés, S. Rodríguez-Ruiz, J. Abilés, C. Mellado, A. García, A. Pérez de la Cruz, et al.
Psychological characteristics of morbidly obese candidates for bariatric surgery.
Obes Surg, 20 (2010), pp. 161-167
[25]
I. Greenberg.
Psychological aspects of bariatric surgery.
Nutr Clin Pract, 18 (2003), pp. 124-130
[26]
J. De Man Lapidoth, A. Ghaderi, C. Norring.
Binge eating in surgical weight-loss treatments. Long-term associations with weight loss, health related quality of life (HRQL), and psychopathology.
Eat Weight Disord, 16 (2011), pp. e263-e269
[27]
T.A. Wadden, L.F. Faulconbridge, L.R. Jones-Corneille, D.B. Sarwer, A.N. Fabricatore, J.G. Thomas, et al.
Binge eating disorder and the outcome of bariatric surgery at one year: a prospective, observational study.
Obesity (Silver Spring), 19 (2011), pp. 1220-1228
[28]
P. Brunault, D. Jacobi, J. Léger, C. Bourbao-Tournois, N. Huten, V. Camus, et al.
Observations regarding ‘quality of life’ and ‘comfort with food’ after bariatric surgery: comparison between laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy.
Obes Surg, 21 (2011), pp. 1225-1231
[29]
J.B. Alley, S.J. Fenton, M.C. Harnisch, D.N. Tapper, J.M. Pfluke, R.M. Peterson.
Quality of life after sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding.
Surg Obes Relat Dis, 8 (2012), pp. 31-40
[30]
J.A. Guisado, F.J. Vaz.
Psychopathological differences between morbidly obese binge eaters and non-binge eaters after bariatric surgery.
Eat Weight Disord, 8 (2003), pp. 315-318
[31]
F.B. Langer, M.A. Reza Hoda, A. Bohdjalian, F.X. Felberbauer, J. Zacherl, E. Wenzl.
Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding: effects on plasma ghrelin levels.
Obes Surg, 15 (2005), pp. 1024-1029
[32]
M. Henderson, A. Freeman.
Self-rating scale for bulimia the BITE.
Br J Psychiatry, 150 (1987), pp. 18-24
[33]
P.J. Cooper, M.J. Taylor, Z. Cooper, C.G. Fairburn.
The development and validation of the Body Shape Questionnaire.
Int J Eat Disord, 6 (1986), pp. 485-494
[34]
J.R. Ware, C.D. Sherbourne, The MOS.
36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) (I) Conceptual framework and item selection.
Med Care, 30 (1992), pp. 473-483
[35]
C. Ferrans, M. Powers.
Quality of Life Index: development and psychometric properties.
ANS Adv Nurs Sci, 8 (1985), pp. 15-24
[36]
D. Garner, M. Olmsted.
Development and validation of a multi-dimensional Eating Disorder Inventory for Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia.
Int J Eat Disord, 2 (1983), pp. 15-34
[37]
K.V. Wood, J. Ogden.
Explaining the role of binge eating behavior in weight loss post bariatric surgery.
Appetite, 59 (2012), pp. 177-180

Please cite this article as: Melero Y, Ferrer JV, Sanahuja Á, Amador L, Hernando D. Evolución psicológica de los pacientes afectos de obesidad mórbida intervenidos mediante una gastrectomía tubular. Cir Esp. 2014;92(6):404–409.

Copyright © 2013. AEC
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos