metricas
Cirugía Española (English Edition) How to effectively transmit knowledge
Journal Information
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Scientific letter
Full text access

How to effectively transmit knowledge

Cómo transmitir de manera efectiva el conocimiento
Visits
846
Ana Senent Bozaa,
Corresponding author
, Salvador Morales Condeb,c
a Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
b Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
c Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

Like any other discipline, the development of medicine and surgery has depended on effective transmission of knowledge acquired over generations, which in turn has supported new studies that have expanded the scientific evidence available. As surgeons, it is our responsibility to transmit our knowledge to medical students and surgical residents. Furthermore, in order to contribute to the continuous development of our specialty, we must also report the advances and discoveries obtained in our research to the scientific community.

The transmission of knowledge is a communication process involving several components1: sender, receiver, channel (the means of communication) and message (the content of the information). Additionally, a distinction can be made between explicit knowledge, which can be easily documented, structured and transmitted, versus tacit knowledge,2 which refers to the skills acquired through experience and is more difficult to formalize and transmit, although essential in the surgical field.

For effective transmission of information, the sender must adapt the message to the receiver and the channel. It is crucial to avoid the information overload that we tend to experience when mastering a certain area of knowledge, presenting the content in a clear and concise manner, breaking it down into blocks of information, repeating key ideas to facilitate understanding, and adapting the complexity of the information presented to the recipient.

In recent decades, the means of transmitting information has evolved significantly. Classic sources of information, like books and scientific articles, allow for knowledge to be acquired autonomously, with no need for the sender and receiver to coincide in time or space. However, the efficiency of learning improves when the receiver is not merely a passive agent but is instead an active participant.3 The sender must promote active teaching through discussion, reciprocal communication and guided reasoning, encouraging the formulation of questions and answering them. While in-person classes and surgical training remain essential, technology and the multiple digital platforms available have diversified the communication channel and expanded the possibilities for learning. Through webinars, virtual conferences and digital platforms with specific audiovisual content (like AEC Connect), knowledge now reaches a wider and more heterogeneous audience, overcoming geographical barriers and offering valid alternatives in critical situations, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Surgery is based on the practical application of theoretical concepts and the mastery of surgical procedures. The transmission of this tacit knowledge has traditionally been based on the “see one, do one, teach one” method proposed by William Halsted at the end of the 19th century.4 Today, this has evolved into something more similar to “see many, simulate many, do many, teach many”, complemented by both physical and virtual simulation, which provides a safe environment to acquire technical skills before applying them to real patients.5–7

In this process of acquiring knowledge and skills, the standardization of surgical procedures is a key element. By breaking down the process into different phases, both teaching and learning are made easier, and the process can be better internalized. The initial stage entails understanding the phases of surgery through theoretical study, watching videos, and attending live surgeries performed by experts. Afterwards, the knowledge acquired during the observation phase should be put into practice, and procedures are performed under the supervision of an expert to correct any errors. Technological advances have also revolutionized this phase of the training process in terms of the communication channel. Today, telemedicine facilitates live mentoring of surgical procedures by experts who may be thousands of kilometers away, and artificial intelligence can provide objective supervision and feedback during the process of learning surgical skills and decision-making.8

We must bear in mind that tacit knowledge does not only include technical skills. It is necessary to learn how to manage stress, research, make decisions under pressure, work as team, interact with patients and their families, resolve conflicts, etc. These skills must also be transmitted and are required for achieving professional excellence, together with theoretical knowledge and technical skills. Without a doubt, training programs in non-technical skills should be included in our formal training as surgeons,9 as they also affect the health of our patients.10

The effective transmission of knowledge is essential for the advancement of surgery. It requires understanding and optimizing the components of communication. In our role as transmitters, this means diversifying communication channels, adapting the message to the receiver, and promoting 2-way interaction. The ability to transmit what has been learned is not only a desirable skill, but it is our responsibility as surgeons due to its positive effect on the quality of patient care and the future of our specialty. Thus, we should develop and enhance effective transmission of knowledge throughout our careers.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

In the process of composing this paper, the authors used ChatGPT to adjust the word count to the maximum allowed. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as necessary, assuming full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Funding

This research paper has received no specific support from public, commercial or non-profit entities.

References
[1]
C.E. Shannon.
A mathematical theory of communication.
Bell Syst Tech J, 27 (1948), pp. 379-423
[2]
H.M. Collins.
Tacit and explicit knowledge.
University of Chicago Press, (2010),
[3]
J.G.Y. Luc, M.B. Antonoff.
Active learning in medical education: application to the training of surgeons.
J Med Educ Curric Dev, 3 (2016),
[4]
J.L. Cameron.
William Stewart Halsted: our surgical heritage.
[5]
S.V. Kotsis, K.C. Chung.
Application of the "see one, do one, teach one" concept in surgical training.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 131 (2013), pp. 1194-1201
[6]
D. Nestel, J. Groom, S. Eikeland-Husebø, J.M. O’Donnell.
Simulation for learning and teaching procedural skills: the state of the science.
Simul Healthc, 6 Suppl (2011), pp. S10-S13
[7]
W.C. McGaghie, S.B. Issenberg, E.R. Cohen, J.H. Barsuk, D.B. Wayne.
Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence.
Acad Med, 86 (2011), pp. 706-711
[8]
S. Rodler, C. Ganjavi, P. De Backer, et al.
Generative artificial intelligence in surgery.
Surgery, 175 (2024), pp. 1496-1502
[9]
B. Oves-Suarez, J.A. García-Marín, J.L. Aguayo-Albasini, V. Soria-Aledo.
Unveilling the hidden skillset: exploring non-technical skills in surgical education across spanish medical universities.
BMC Med Educ, 24 (2024), pp. 376
[10]
E. Abahuje, L. Cong, C.B. Iroz, et al.
A prospective study to assess the relationship between Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) and patient outcomes.
J Surg Educ, 81 (2024), pp. 1568-1576
asdasdasd
Article options
Tools