metricas
covid
Buscar en
Vacunas
Toda la web
Inicio Vacunas The status of COVID-19 vaccines in India: A review
Información de la revista
Vol. 24. Núm. 3.
Páginas 218-247 (julio - septiembre 2023)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
358
Vol. 24. Núm. 3.
Páginas 218-247 (julio - septiembre 2023)
Review article
Acceso a texto completo
The status of COVID-19 vaccines in India: A review
El estado de las vacunas COVID-19 en India: Una revisión
Visitas
358
Deepak Kumar Jhaa, Kumar Pranayb, Samikshac, Amit Kumard, Niti Yashvardhinic,
Autor para correspondencia
nitiyashvardhini@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
a Department of Zoology, S.M.P. Rajkiya Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Ballia 277401, India
b Department of Biochemistry, IGIMS, Patna 800 014, India
c Department of Microbiology, Patna Women's College, Patna, 800 001, India
d Department of Botany, Patna University, Patna 800 005, India
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (13)
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Tablas (11)
Table 1. Traditional vaccines and their licensed manufacturing processes.
Table 2. List of different types of COVID-19 Vaccines.
Table 3. List of COVID-19 vaccines approved by at least one country.
Table 4. Types of COVID-19 Vaccine developed across the globe.
Table 5. List of approved vaccines for COVID-19; data retrieved from https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2020/3/covid-19-vaccine-tracker accessed on 23 August 2021.
Table 6. List of COVID-19 vaccines approved by World Health Organization (WHO).
Table 7. List of COVID-19 Vaccines approved in India.
Table 8. List of Indigenous Vaccines of India.
Table 9. List of Non-Indigenous Vaccines of India or Global Vaccines with Indian Partners.
Table 10. Cumulative coverage report of COVID-19 Vaccination (As on 5th May 2022) (Source: www.mohfw.gov.in).
Table 11. Some challenges faced by COVID-19 vaccines.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract

The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, an etiologic agent of the COVID-19 pandemic disease in late December 2019 has left the whole world aghast with huge health and economic losses. Due to a lack of specific knowledge and understanding at the initial stages, an unprecedented rise in COVID-19 cases has been recorded globally. Various preventive measures and strategies were implemented, however, for the radical control of SARS-CoV-2 infections; it seems that the only effective way to control the ongoing infections is large-scale vaccination. So far, WHO has approved 11 vaccines for emergency use namely Pfizer/BioNTech, Oxford/Astra Zeneca, Johnson and Johnson, Moderna, Covilo, Novavax, Covovax, Spikevax, Can Sino, Comirnaty, and Coronavac while five other needs approval. The worldwide vaccination dataset reveals that 65.7% of the world population has received their first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. As a consequence of the proactive implementation of India's vaccination program, a historical milestone of administering over 1.9 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been achieved on 19th May 2022. This review summarizes the different types of traditional and modern vaccine designing strategies with an emphasis on COVID-19. Moreover, the review highlights the status of vaccines for COVID-19 approved in India which includes both indigenous and non-indigenous vaccines. The present article also encompasses vaccine designing and developmental strategies, efficacy, safety profile and usage among the population, and the efficacy of modern vaccines over traditional ones.

Keywords:
COVID-19
Vaccination
India
Pandemic
Indigenous vaccine
Resumen

El brote de SARS-CoV-2, un agente etiológico de la enfermedad pandémica COVID-19, a fines de diciembre de 2019, ha dejado al mundo entero horrorizado con enormes pérdidas económicas y de salud. Debido a la falta de conocimiento y comprensión específicos en las etapas iniciales, se ha registrado un aumento sin precedentes en los casos de COVID-19 a nivel mundial. Sin embargo, se implementaron diversas medidas y estrategias preventivas para el control radical de las infecciones por SARS-CoV-2; parece que la única forma eficaz de controlar las infecciones en curso es la vacunación a gran escala. Hasta el momento, la OMS ha aprobado 11 vacunas para uso de urgencia Pfizer/BioNTech, Oxford/Astra Zeneca, Johnson and Johnson, Moderna, Covilo, Novavax, Covovax, Spikevax, Can Sino, Comirnaty y Coronavac, mientras que otras cinco necesitan aprobación. El conjunto de datos de vacunación mundial revela que el 65,7% de la población mundial ha recibido su primera dosis de la vacuna COVID-19. Como consecuencia de la implementación proactiva del programa de vacunación de la India, el 19 de mayo de 2022 se logró un hito histórico de administrar más de 1900 millones de dosis de vacunas contra el COVID-19. Esta revisión resume los diferentes tipos de estrategias de diseño de vacunas tradicionales y modernas con énfasis sobre COVID-19. Además, la revisión destaca el estado de las vacunas para COVID-19 aprobadas en India, que incluye vacunas tanto indígenas como no indígenas. El presente artículo también abarca estrategias de diseño y desarrollo de vacunas, eficacia, perfil de seguridad y uso entre la población, y la eficacia de las vacunas modernas sobre las tradicionales.

Palabras clave:
COVID-19
Vacunación
India
Pandemia
Vacuna indígena
Texto completo
Introduction

The first case of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection was reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019 from where this disease spread globally. In a setting of a strongly connected and integrated world, coupled with the high transmissibility of the viral infection,1,2 the disease rapidly spread and was declared a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on January 30, 2020. The unprecedented rise in the number of cases resulted in a declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic in March, 2020. The COVID-19 disease spread exponentially and at present exists in more than 230 countries and has resulted in more than 39 million confirmed cases (WHO). As on date 20th July, 2022 the number of COVID-19 cases across the globe reached 561,156,416 with 6,365,510 casualties (WHO dashboard).

The WHO together with the United States Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (EDC) issued several guidelines and health advisories to prevent the spread of the outbreak. WHO declares COVID-19 vaccines as safe and data strongly suggests that the risk of infection and severity of symptoms associated with the disease is low for vaccinated people. WHO recommends wearing a mask in indoor public places, people above the age of 2 years should wear a mask in case they are not vaccinated, or fully vaccinated in an area with high risk of infection. People should wear masks in crowded outdoor places and for working at places where others are not vaccinated. A distance of 6 ft is essential and people should avoid crowded places unless urgent. WHO recommends proper washing of hands as well as covering is essential while coughing and sneezing to avoid the spread of this disease.

Coronaviruses are positive-sense, enveloped, single-stranded RNA viruses that possess helical nucleocapsid. Belonging to the family Coronaviridae, the coronavirus envelope comprises of club-shaped glycoprotein projections.3 The diameter of SARS-CoV-2 ranges from 60–140 nm, often found in its pleomorphic form.4 SARS-CoV-2 is a beta coronavirus belonging to the same subgenus as MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV.5 As SARS-CoV-2 shares 89% nucleotide identity similar to bat SARS- like- CoVZXC21 and 82% similarity with human SARS-CoV, hence, named SARS-CoV-2 by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses4 and its transmissibility could be measured by R0 value (Reproduction number) 6 where SARS-CoV-2 has an R0 value range of 2–3.1,4

This virus contains 4 different structural proteins; spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M) and nucleocapsid (N) and other structural and accessory proteins (HE, 3a/b protein and 4a/b protein).7,8 The spike protein (S) is a trimeric envelope glycoprotein that plays a vital role in the transmission of infection as it undergoes cleavage into an amino (N)-terminal S1 subunit which helps the incorporation of the virus into the host cell, hence a major target for vaccines. This S1 subunit has a neutralizing response to antisera due to its binding with the host cell.5,9,10 E protein forms the viroporins (E channels) and is involved in viral replication cycle.11 N-protein constitutes the helical nucleocapsid and binds with the viral RNA genome.12 M-protein, the most abundantly expressed protein in virus particle is the main organizer of coronavirus assembly and is involved in the morphogenesis and assembly of SARS-CoV-2 by interacting with the essential structural proteins and is also linked with the process of apoptosis in the host cell.13

SARS-CoV-2 entry into the host's cell is facilitated by the spike RBD domain. This domain allows binding with the ACE-2 receptor abundantly present in respiratory epithelium and other organs such as the upper esophagus, proximal tubular cells of the kidney, myocardial cells, urothelial cells of bladder.14,15 SARS-CoV-2 captures the target cell by using human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) as the entry receptor through the spike glycoprotein (S-protein) and recruits the cellular serine protease TMPRSS2 (Type 2 transmembrane serine protease) for priming of S2 protein.16–21 ACE 2 and TMPRSS2 express in alveolar epithelial type II cells of host target cells.22,23 An overview of the life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

An overview of life cycle of SARS-CoV-2.

(0,22MB).

The incubation period of SARS-CoV-2 lies between 1–14 days and symptom manifestation starts around 5 days in most cases which correspond to the highest virus load in respiratory tract.24 The reported symptoms observed in COVID-19 patients are chest tightness/dyspnea, dry cough, fatigue, fever, gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, joint pain, loss of taste and smell, myalgia and sore throat. The principal target for SARS-CoV-2 is the respiratory system but can also affect other vital organs such as central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular, renal, and gastrointestinal tract.4 SARS-CoV-2 mainly spreads through respiratory droplet transmission from person to person by a person's cough, sneeze or talk; or it may also occur through fomites, live viral particles adhering to inanimate objects.25,26

Previously, several articles have been published on the impact of COVID-19 on environmental factors, where multiple study showed a significant correlation between climatic indicators like humidity, temperature, due point, wind speed rainfall and SARS-CoV-2 induced fatality.27–31However, it has been evident from the previous research that temperature affects the COVID-19 transmissions, but have been found mixed i.e. positive, negative as well as insignificant on the transmissibility of COVID-19 infections.32–34 Another important indicator of environmental issues is air pollution which affects the COVID-19 transmission, morbidity and mortality rate.35–37 For instances, Northern Italy was severely affected by SARS-CoV-2 infections, where the air pollution was found more polluted than the rest of the country. Significantly higher incidence of COVID-19 related casualties have been reported.36,38,39 Therefore, it may be concluded that COVID-19 influences the environmental factors and vice versa. The pandemic has brought major loss of human life globally, and severely affecting almost every aspects of human life including global economy, ecosystem, health sector, industrial operations etc.

During the initial phases of viral outbreak no effective antiviral therapy was available, although several drugs (Hydroxychloroquine, Chloroquine, Remdesivir, Favipiravir, Azithromycin, Lopinavir), plasma therapy, oxygen treatment, antibiotics, convalescent plasma were being used in an emergency.26 But, the rapid spread and the urgency of the situation resulted in the development of COVID-19 vaccine in just 12 months of the onset of this pandemic. According to an official report from national public health agencies, as on 21st July 2022, 12.24 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered worldwide. Today, India with its robust vaccine development program is not only manufacturing domestic COVID-19 vaccines but also distributing them in the global market.40 The present review highlights the different strategies used in traditional vaccine development. An emphasis was given on the strategies used by different institutes and companies for the development of COVID-19 vaccine. A thorough study was done on COVID-19 vaccine development strategy in Indian context. This review also highlights the challenges in the development of COVID-19 vaccine, the ethical concern and the future prospect of the vaccines. A detailed study has also been done on the linkage of COVID-19 with other diseases like cancer and autoimmunity. This study also includes the status of vaccination in different states of India, the status of approved and still under process vaccines. A futuristic model has also been suggested for the development of COVID-19 vaccine. This review is novel as it not only highlights the COVID-19 vaccine development strategies but links it with various diseases like autoimmunity and cancer and suggests the ethical concern, market size and future prospect of COVID-19 vaccine development in India. The step by step research done in this review is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Flow diagram for the systematic review performed on COVID-19 vaccine development in India.

(0,22MB).
Traditional vaccine development strategies

Vaccines are the biological molecules that induce an immune response against any infection or disease inside the body.41 Within the last few years, infectious diseases around the world have resulted in an increment of death rates and are known to be the major cause of mortality.42 Vaccination and immunization, the keystone of public health policy made a major contribution to global health. Development of a vaccine involves the use of microorganisms responsible for the disease development either in the killed or weakened form.43 Vaccine, the most effective prophylaxis has the potential to generate herd immunity in the communities thereby reducing the occurrence of disease and hence blocking its transmission.44 Vaccines help in producing memory cells and hence after subsequent infection with the same pathogen immunity develops faster.45 A safe vaccine does not produce any IgE mediated immune responses in the host's body and hence remains non- allergenic.46 Development of a successful vaccine generally requires 12–15 years including both public and private involvement. The fastest vaccine developed so far, before COVID-19 for mumps took 5 years.6 The live, attenuated mumps vaccine used nowadays in the United States, licensed in 1967 was developed by Maurice Hilleman using virus from his daughter. Several vaccines developed using traditional approach is shown in table 1.

Table 1.

Traditional vaccines and their licensed manufacturing processes.

Serial No.  Disease  Trade Name  Generic Name  Cell Culture/ Fermentation 
1.  Anthrax  Biothrax  Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed  Chemically defined protein-free media growing a microaerophilic culture of avirulent, nonencapsulated Bacillus anthracis 
2.  Haemophilus influenzae  ActHIB  Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccine (Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate)  Grown of Haemophilus influenzae type b strain 1482 grown in a semisynthetic medium 
3.  Hepatitis A  Havrix  Hepatitis A Vaccine, Inactivated  Hepatitis A (strain HM175) propagated in MRC-5 human diploid cells 
4.  Hepatitis B  Recombivax HB  Hepatitis B Vaccine (recombinant)  Recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) produced in yeast cells grown in a complex medium of extract of yeast, soy peptone, dextrose, amino acids, and mineral salts 
5.  Influenza  Fluzone  Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine  Propagation on embryonated chicken eggs 
6.  Japanese encephalitis  JE-VAX  Japanese Encephalitis Virus Vaccine Inactivated  Intracerebral inoculation of mice 
7.  Measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella  ProQuad  Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella (Oka/Merck) Virus Vaccine Live  Measles virus propagated in chick embryo cell culture; mumps virus in chick embryo cell culture; rubella virus propagated in WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts; varicella virus propagated on MRC-5 cells 
8.  Meningococcal  Menactra  Meningococcal (groups A, C, Y, and W-135) Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine  Meningococcal strains are cultured individually on Mueller-Hinton agar and grown in Watson-Scherp media; Corynebacterium diphtheriae grown on modified Mueller and Miller medium 
9.  Pneumococcal  Prevnar  Pneumococcal 13-valent Conjugate Vaccine (Diphtheria CRM197 Protein)  Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7 F, 9 V, 14, 18 C, 19A, 19 F, and 23 F individually grown on soy peptone broth; C. diphtheriae strain containing CRM197 grown in casamino acids and yeast extract–based medium 
10.  Polio  IPOL  Poliovirus Vaccine Inactivated  Types 1, 2, and 3 poliovirus individually grown in Vero cells on microcarriers using Eagle MEM modified medium supplemented with newborn calf serum 
11.  Rabies  RabAvert  Rabies Vaccine  Rabies virus grown in primary culture of chicken fibroblasts in synthetic cell culture medium with the addition of human albumin, polygeline, and antibiotics 
12.  Streptococcus pneumoniae  Pneumovax  Pneumococcal vaccine polyvalent  ND 
13.  Typhoid fever  Vivotif  Typhoid Vaccine Live Oral Ty21a  Fermentation using medium containing a digest of yeast extract, an acid digest of casein, dextrose, and galactose 
14.  Yellow fever  YF-Vax  Yellow Fever Vaccine  Strain 17D-204 of yellow fever is cultured on living avian leukosis virus-free chicken embryos 

ND – Not disclosed.

The development of successful vaccine safe for public use requires proper protocol development by regulatory agencies such as European Medicines Agency (EMA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) and other bodies. The development process involves preclinical (in vitro and in vivo testing in animals) and clinical (clinical trials in human candidates) stages for the planning of clinical development path of novel vaccine candidate.47 The different stages of vaccine development involves exploratory, pre-clinical, clinical and post marketing stage as shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Traditional Vaccine Development Stages (10–15 years).

(0,14MB).

According to the candidate used for vaccine development vaccine can be live attenuated, inactivated, protein-based, nucleic acid based, viral vector based, toxoid, conjugate and outer membrane vesicles vaccine43 (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Different types of traditional vaccine development strategy. Strategy involved in vaccine development.

(0,4MB).
Live attenuated vaccines

This is the traditional method of vaccine development containing whole bacteria or virus in its weakened form so as to build up a protective immune response.48 Live attenuated vaccines can be obtained by transferring the disease causing organism through a series of cell cultures or embryos of animals (chick embryos).45 The weakened organism replicates same as a natural infection thereby causing a humoral and cell mediated immune response.44 The live attenuated vaccines induce immune system against specific viruses and often need only a single immunization without booster doses.45 However, live attenuated vaccines are not suitable for immunocompromised as well as weak people as the disease can develop. The vaccines developed using live attenuated form include BCG, smallpox, Polio (Albert Sabin's oral polio vaccine), measles, rubella, mumps, rotavirus vaccine, varicella vaccine, and yellow fever vaccine.44,45

Inactivated vaccines

These vaccines do not contain any live ingredient as they are produced from pathogens deactivated by formaldehyde or heat.16 These chemicals impair the replicative ability of pathogens but they can still be recognized by the host's immune system. To induce more immunogenicity booster doses are required as these candidates are less immunogenic.49 The vaccines developed against Hepatitis A, rabies, Salk polio and influenza are some important inactivated vaccines.43,45,50

Protein based vaccinesProtein subunit vaccines

These vaccines use antigenic components (like spike protein) generated in vitro.44 They include only epitopes that trigger the immune system.49 This vaccine does not contain whole bacteria or virus so that immune response can target only a subset of pathogen protein with antigenic properties.45 Subunit vaccines do not create long lasting immune responses, hence require adjuvants and additional booster doses.43 Although peptide vaccines possess high efficacy and several advantages, yet they are not licensed for human use being less immunogenic. These vaccines require adjuvants to enhance immunogenicity and susceptible to enzymatic degradation due to short stretch of amino acids.41 Acellular pertussis vaccines and Influenza vaccines are some vaccines developed using protein subunit approach.

Virus-like particles (VLPs)

These molecules closely resemble viruses but incapable of infecting the host cell as they don't contain viral genetic material. They are safe and stimulate strong immune responses but are difficult to manufacture.44 These virus particles selected are immunological as well as capable of eliciting both antibody and cell-mediated immune responses.51

These virus particles can be generated experimentally using recombinant viral proteins in the laboratory. These particles may be expressed in an array of expression systems including prokaryotic cells, yeasts, insect cell lines, plants and mammalian cell lines.51 The capsid proteins of HIV, HBV, Hepatitis C, bacteriophages are commonly used to develop vaccine.51–54

Nucleic acid vaccines

Nucleic acid vaccines are quick and easy to develop using genetic material from a pathogen.

DNA vaccines

DNA vaccines are produced by inserting antigenic components of a pathogen into a plasmid stimulating humoral as well as cell mediated immune response. Electroporation is commonly used for administration of these plasmids resulting in production of high antibody titer.44 These vaccines also encode for adjuvants required for the stimulation of adaptive immune response.16 The design of the vaccines allows its translocation inside the nucleus of the host cell, where it is transcribed into a functional copy of mRNA.55

RNA vaccines

These vaccines contain messenger RNA (mRNA) molecule inside a shell of lipid membrane which protects as well as facilitates the entry of vaccine by fusing with the cell membrane. The mRNA molecule of the vaccine encodes for a disease specific antigen which is displayed on the cell surface eliciting a proper immune response.56 These mRNA molecules are safe as they do not cause disease and results in Th2 cell skewed response.44 mRNA vaccine supports rapid vaccine development program as it mimics antigen structure and expression similar to natural infection.57

Viral vector vaccines

These vaccines are produced by isolating an antigen from pathogen and integrating it into a bacterial or viral vector system.43 The bacteria or virus behaves as a vector that replicates and expresses pathogenic gene inside the cell.45 Viral vector vaccines are grown on cell lines hence easily and cheaply developed. As viral vector vaccines produce endogenous antigen hence, activate both humoral and cellular immune responses in single dose.56,57 Viral vector vaccines depending on the replicating ability can either be replicating and non-replicating.

Replicating viral vector vaccines

This vaccine strategy engages innate immunity targeting mainly mucosal sites. These types of vaccines have the ability to make new viral particles besides delivering the vaccine antigen when used as a vaccine delivery platform. Separate virus like measles or adenovirus are genetically engineered and modified to express the desired gene of interest.1 Adenoviruses are the most commonly used virus for replicating viral vector vaccines. Subsequent booster doses are essential to acquire long term humoral immunity. Examples of replicating viral vector vaccines are: HPV, pertussis and Hepatitis B.

Non-replicating viral vector vaccines

In this vaccine strategy, viral vectors are genetically modified to impair the replicating mechanism and hence become non-replicating virus. These makes the viral strain attenuated and a potent vaccine candidate as it only triggers immune response without replicating in human host. Adenoviruses are the most commonly exploited virus for vector vaccines. These vaccines only produce the vaccine antigen and are unable to make new viral particles. The inactivated gene from an unrelated virus (measles or adenovirus) is genetically engineered to express the gene of interest.43 The non-replicating vaccine induce pathogen specific host response which includes killed pathogens, synthetic pathogen structure or recombinant pathogen product as antigens. This type of vaccine creates strong humoral as well as CD8+ T-cell mediated immune response but the strength depends on the type of viral serotype being used. Non-replicating vaccines are safer over others as the risk of disease onset is quite low.

Toxoid vaccines

Toxoid vaccines contain attenuated toxins inducing humoral immune response. The purification of bacterial toxins followed by their inactivation with formaldehyde leads to generation of a toxoid, routinely used to make diphtheria and tetanus toxins. The inoculation with a toxoid, results in release of anti-toxoid antibody that readily binds and neutralizes its toxicity. Toxoid vaccines do not provide prolonged immunity; hence require regular booster doses for effective protection. Toxoid vaccines provide protection against diphtheria and tetanus.

Conjugate vaccines

Conjugate vaccines made by combining two distinct components, hence similar to recombinant vaccines. Bacterial coat fragments are coupled to a carrier protein that is utilized in vaccination. Conjugate vaccines elicit a stronger co-immune response whereas fragments of bacteria show less immunological response. This bacterial fragment does not cause disease, but provides protection against future infections when associated with carrier proteins. These vaccines are used in pneumococcal vaccinations to protect children against bacterial illnesses.58

Outer membrane vesicles vaccine

The outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, sometimes form extracellular vesicles (outer membrane vesicles, OMV) with a diameter of 20 to 300 nm. Since the driving factor for OMV development remained unclear for a long period, the establishment of OMVs still remains unclear.59,60 OMV production assumed to be a random stress response from bacterial cells 61.

In recent years, OMVs have attracted significant attraction in form of vaccine delivery system against bacterial infections.62 OMV investigated as a potential vaccination against Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B illness. Following the success of the MeNZB OMV-based vaccine in suppressing N. meningitidis B epidemic in New Zealand, subsequent research culminated in approval of Bexsero, against meningococcal B strains 63.

COVID-19 vaccine development

Vaccine development; a long and complex process which takes years and even decades for successful vaccine formulation. However, the COVID-19 vaccine development program took a year and was a miracle across the globe.60 COVID-19 vaccine development was a big challenge for the researchers as it was targeted to develop a vaccine in a span of 12–24 months.43 The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccine was facilitated by well-timed release of viral genome sequence, advancement and innovation in vaccine technology, active participation of global scientific community, robust regulatory framework, adequate funding by the government as well as huge market demand.61 By the start of December, 2020, the researchers around the globe announced excellent results in vaccine development (Table 2) and on 2nd December, 2020, vaccine developed by Pfizer with German biotech firm BioNTech, became the first fully tested vaccine to be approved for emergency use.62 Many vaccines were approved by several countries as shown in Table 3. The strategies used by the vaccines developed by several countries are shown in Table 4.

Table 2.

List of different types of COVID-19 Vaccines.

Vaccine Type  Vaccine Candidate  Vaccine Developer/Manufacturer  Number of Doses  Route of administration 
Live-attenuated virus  COVI-VAC  Codagenix/Serum Institute of India (India)  (1–2)  Intranasal. 
  DelNS1-SARS-CoV-2-RBD  University of Hong-Kong  Intranasal 
Inactivated  CoronaVac  Sinovac (China)  Intramuscular; 
  Unnamed  Wuhan Institute of Biological Products/Sinopharm(China)  Intramuscular 
  BBIBP-CorV  Beijing Institute of Biological Products/Sinopharm(China)  Intramuscular 
  Unnamed  Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy ofMedical Sciences (China)  Intramuscular 
  BBV152  Bharat Biotech  Intramuscular 
  QazCovid-in  Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems(Kazakhstan)  Intramuscular 
  Unnamed  Beijing Minhai Biotechnology Co (China)  (1, 2, 3)  Intramuscular 
  VLA2001  Valneva, National Institute for Health Research (UK)  Intramuscular 
  Unnamed  Shifa Pharmed Industrial Co (Iran)  Intramuscular 
  ERUCOV-VAC  Erciyes University (Turkey)  Intramuscular 
DNA  INO-4800  Inovio Pharmaceuticals/InternationalVaccine Institute (USA)  Intradermal 
  AG0301-COVID19AG0302-COVID19  Osaka University/AnGes/Takara Bio (Japan)  Intramuscular 
  ZyCoV-D  Cadila Healthcare Limited (India)  Intradermal 
  bacTRL-Spike  Symvivo (Canada)  Oral 
  GX-19  Genexine Consortium (South Korea)  Intramuscular 
  CORVax  Providence Health & Services (USA)  Intradermal 
  Covigenix VAX-001  Entos Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Canada)  Intramuscular 
  GLS-5310  GeneOne Life Science, Inc. (South Korea)  Intradermal 
  COVIGEN  University of Sydney, Bionet Co., Ltd.Technovalia (Australia)  Intramuscular 
  COVID-eVax  Takis/Rottapharm Biotech (Italy)  –  Intramuscular 
RNA  mRNA-1273  Moderna/NIAID (USA)  Intramuscular 
  BNT162b1, BNT162b2  BioNTech (Germany)//Pfizer (USA)  Intramuscular 
  CVNCOV  Curevac (Germany  Intramuscular 
  ARCT-021  Arcturus (USA)/Duke-NUS (Singapore)  –  – 
  LNP-nCoVsaRNA  Imperial College London (UK)  Intramuscular 
  SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine  Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital/Center for Disease Control and Prevention ofGuangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region(China)  Intramuscular 
  PTX-COVID19-B  Providence Therapeutics (Canada)  Intramuscular 
  ChulaCov19  Chulalongkorn University (Thailand)  Intramuscular 
Protein subunit  NVX-CoV2373  Novavax (USA)  Intramuscular 
  ZF 2001  Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical/ Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (China)  2 or 3  Intramuscular 
  KBP-COVID-19/KBP-201  Kentucky Bioprocessing, Inc. (USA)  Intramuscular 
  Unnamed  Sanofi Pasteur (France)/GSK (UK)  Intramuscular 
  CORBEVAX  Biological E Ltd. (India)  Intramuscular 
  SCB-2019  Clover Biopharmace  Intramuscular 
  COVAX-19  Vaxine Pty Ltd. (Australia)/Medytox (South Korea)  Intramuscular 
  MVC-COV1901  Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corporation (Taiwan)/NIAID/Dynavax (USA  Intramuscular 
  Soberana 01  Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology(Cuba)  Intramuscular 
  Soberana 02  Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology(Cuba)  Intramuscular 
  Unnamed  FBRI SRC VB VECTOR, Rospotrebnadzor,Koltsovo (Russia)  Intramuscular 
  CoVAC-1  University Hospital Tuebingen (Germany)  Subcutaneous 
  UB-612  COVAXX (USA)/United Biomedical Inc. Asia (Taiwan)  Intramuscular 
  Unnamed  Adimmune Corporation (Taiwan)  –  – 
  Unnamed  Nanogen Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (Vietnam)  Intramuscular 
  S-268019  Shionogi Inc. (Japan)  Intramuscular 
  FINLAY-FR1  Instituto Finlay de Vacunas (Cuba)  Intramuscular 
  FINLAY-FR2  Instituto Finlay de Vacunas (Cuba)  Intramuscular 
  SARS-CoV-2-RBD-Fc fusion protein  University Medical Center Groningen (Netherlands) +Akston Biosciences Inc. (USA)  –  Subcutaneous or Intramuscular 
  COVAC-1 and COVAC-2subunit vaccine (spike protein) + SWE adjuvant  University of Saskatchewan (Canada)  Intramuscular 
  GBP510  SK Bioscience Co., Ltd. (South Korea)  Intramuscular 
  Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute (Iran)  Razi Cov Pars, recombinant spike Protein  Intramuscular and Intranasal 
  MF59 adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2Sclamp vaccine  The University of Queensland (Australia)  Intramuscular 
VLP  Triple Antigen Vaccine  Premas Biotech + Oramed Pharmaceuticals  Oral 
  Unnamed  Medicago Inc. (Canada)  Intramuscular 
  Unnamed  SpyBiotech/Serum Institute of India (India)  Intramuscular 
Non-replicating viral vector  AZD1222; ChAdOx1-S; ChAdOx1 nCoV-1  University of Oxford/AstraZeneca (UK)  (1–2)  Intramuscular 
  Ad5 nCoV  CanSino Biological Inc./Beijing Institute ofBiotechnology (China)  Intramuscular 
  Sputnik V  Gamaleya Research Institute (Russia)  Intramuscular 
  Ad26.COV2.S/JNJ-78436735  Johnson & Johnson (USA)  (1–2)  Intramuscular 
  hAd5-COVID-19/hAd5-S-Fusion+ N-ETSD  ImmunityBio, Inc. & NantKwest Inc. (USA)  Oral 
  Gard-CoV2  ReiThera (Italy)/LEUKOCARE (Germany)/Univercells (Belgium)  Intramuscular 
  COH04S1  City of Hope (USA)  (1–2)  Intramuscular 
  VXA-CoV2–1  Vaxart (USA)  Oral 
  MVA-SARS-2-S  Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich(Germany)  Intramuscular 
  BBV154  Bharat Biotech International Limited (India)  Intranasal 
  LV-SMENP-DC vaccine  Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute(China)  Intravenous and subcutaneous 
Replicating viral vector  Covid-19/aAPC vaccine  Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute(China)  Subcutaneous 
  VSV-S  Israel Institute for Biological Research/ Weizmann Inst. of Science (Israel)  Intramuscular 
  Aivita Biomedical, Inc. (USA)  Dendritic cell vaccine AV-COVID-19  Intramuscular 
  AdCLD-CoV19  Cellid Co., Ltd. (South Korea)  –  Intramuscular 
  NDV-HXP-S, Newcastle diseasevirus vector  Mahidol University; The GovernmentPharmaceutical Organization (GPO);Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai(Thailand)  Intramuscular 
Table 3.

List of COVID-19 vaccines approved by at least one country.

Protein Subunit Vaccine
Serial No.  Company/Research Institute  Vaccine Name 
1.  Anhui Zhifei Longcom  Zifivax 
2.  Bagheiat-allah University of Medical School  Noora Vaccine 
3.  Biological E Limited  Corbevax 
4.  Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB)  Abdala 
5.  Instituto Finlay de Vacunas Cuba  Soberana 02 
6.  Instituto Finlay de Vacunas Cuba  Soberana Plus 
7.  Livzon Mabpharma Inc  V-01 
8.  Medigen  MVC-COV1901 
9.  National Vaccine and serum Institute  Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (CHO Cell) 
10.  Novavax  Nuvaxovid 
11.  PT Bio Farma  IndoVac 
12.  Razi Vaccine and serum Research Institute  Razi Cov Pars 
13.  Sanofi/GSK  VidPrevtyn Beta 
14.  Serum Institute of India  COVOVAX (Novavax formulation) 
15.  SK Biosciences Co Ltd  SKYCovione 
16.  Takeda  TAk-019 (Novavax formulation) 
17.  Vaxine/ CinnaGen Co.  SpikoGen 
18.  Vector State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology  Aurora-CoV 
19.  Vector State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology  EpiVacCorona 
Inactivated Vaccine
Serial No.  Company/Research Institute  Vaccine Name 
1.  Bharat Biotech  Covaxin 
2.  Chumakov Center  KoviVac 
3.  Health Institutes of Turkey  Turkovac 
4.  Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research  FAKHRAVAC (MIVAC) 
5.  Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems (RIBSP)  QazVac 
6.  Shenzhen Kangtai Biological Products Co  KCONVAC 
7.  Shifi Pharmed Industrial Co  COVIran Barekat 
8.  Sinopharm (Beijing)  Covilo 
9.  Sinopharm (Wuhan)  Inactivated (Vero Cells) 
10.  Sinovac  CoronaVac 
11.  Valneva  VLA2001 
Non Replicating Viral Vaccine
Serial No.  Company/Research Institute  Vaccine Name 
1.  Bharat Biotech  iNCOVACC 
2.  Cansino  Convidecia 
3.  Cansino  Convidecia Air 
4.  Gamaleya  Gam-COVID-Vac 
5.  Gamaleya  Sputnik Light 
6.  Gamaleya  Sputnik V 
7.  Janssen (Johnson & Johnson)  Jcovden 
8.  Oxford/AstraZeneca  Vaxzevria 
9.  Serum Institute of India  Covishield (Oxford/AstraZeneca formulation) 
RNA Vaccine
Serial No.  Company/Research Institute  Vaccine Name 
1.  Gennova Biopharmaceuticals Limited  GEMCOVAC-19 
2.  Moderna  Spikevax 
3.  Moderna  Spikevax Bivalent Original/Omicron BA.1 
4.  Moderna  Spikevax Bivalent Original/Omicron BA.4/ BA.5 
5.  Pfizer/BioNTech  Comirnaty 
6.  Pfizer/BioNTech  Comirnaty Bivalent Original/Omicron BA.1 
7.  Pfizer/BioNTech  Comirnaty Bivalent Original/Omicron BA.4/ BA.5 
8.  Takeda  TAK-919 (Moderna formulation) 
9.  Walvax  AWcorna 
VLP (Virus Like Particle) Vaccine
Serial No.  Company/Research Institute  Vaccine Name 
1.  Medicago  Covifenz 
DNA Vaccine
Serial No.  Company/Research Institute  Vaccine Name 
1.  Zydus Cadila  ZyCoV-D 
Table 4.

Types of COVID-19 Vaccine developed across the globe.

Type  Manufacturer  Name  Stabilizing mutations  Virus strain  Eukaryotic production cell line  Dosage  References 
mRNA  BioNTech-Pfizer (Germany, USA)  BNT162b2, Comirnaty  Yes (prolines)  Wuhan-Hu-1  not applicable  30μg RNA (2x)  104,105 
mRNA  Moderna-NIAID (USA)  mRNA-1273, COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna  yes (prolines)  Wuhan-Hu-1  not applicable  100μg RNA (2x)  106,107 
mRNA  CureVac (Germany)  CVnCoV  yes (prolines)  Wuhan-Hu-1  not applicable  12μg RNA (2x)  108 
Adenovector  University of Oxford-AstraZeneca (UK, Sweden)  COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca, AZD1222, ChAdOx1-S, Vaxzeria; Covishield  no  Wuhan-Hu-1  HEK293  5 × 1010 adenovirus vector particles (2x)  109 
Adenovector  CanSino Biological Inc., Beijing Institute of Biotechnology (China)  Ad5 nCoV, Convidecia  no  Wuhan-Hu-1  HEK293  5 × 1010 adenovirus vector particles (2x)  111 
Adenovector  Gamaleya Research Institute (Russia)  rAd26-S + rAd5-S, Gam-COVID-Vac, Sputnik V  no  Wuhan-Hu-1 (probably)  HEK293  10 × 1010 adenovirus vector particles (2x)  112,113 
Adenovector  Janssen-Johnson & Johnson (NL/USA)  Ad26.COV2.S, COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen  yes (prolines, furin cleavage site)  Wuhan-Hu-1  PER.C6  5 × 1010 adenovirus vector particles (1x)  114–116 
Inactivated whole virus  Sinopharm,Beijing Institute of Biological Products Co (China)  BBIBP-CorV, Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine  not applicable  Wuhan-Hu-1-like HB02 strain  Vero  4μg proposed (2x)  117,118 
Inactivated whole virus  Sinovac (China)  CoronaVac  not applicable  Wuhan-Hu-1-like CN2 strain  Vero  3μg proposed (2x)  119,120 
Inactivated whole virus  Bharat Biotech (India)  Covaxin, BBV152  not applicable  NIV2020–770 (D614G)  Vero  6μg proposed (2x)  121–123 
Subunit  Novavax (USA)  NVX-CoV2373  yes (prolines, furin cleavage site)  Wuhan-Hu-1  Sf9  5μgS (+50μg adjuvant) (2x)  124,125 

Several strategies were accepted in the development of Coronavirus vaccines (Table 4), and most of these strategies targeted the S-protein or the surface-exposed spike (S) as the major inducer of neutralizing antibodies.64 Jha et al., reported the antigenicity as well as allergenicity of different structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2 to design vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. This analysis showed that the envelope protein (E) to be highly antigenic having the antigenicity of 0.6025 followed by Membrane glycoprotein (M) having antigenicity of 0.5102, Nucleocapsid phosphoprotein having antigenicity of 0.5059 and Surface glycoprotein (S) with antigenicity of 0.4696.46 S protein plays a major role in the stimulation of protective immunity during infection with SARS-CoV-2 by evoking neutralizing antibodies and T-cell responses. Hence, the full length or partial protein of S-glycoprotein can be the most effective vaccine target against coronavirus.9,12,64,65 The vaccine designing strategy includes both immunoinformatics and experimental studies for getting a suitable candidate for vaccine candidate. The immunoinformatics study helps in selection of candidate whereas experimental studies confirm the candidate for vaccine production (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Flow diagram showing the immunoinformatics and experimental study involved in vaccine development.

(0,29MB).

COVID-19 vaccine development process started with the genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2, first available on January, 11, 2020. (Fig. 6). The preclinical data for SARS-CoV and MERS saved considerable time eliminating the initial step of exploratory phase.43 Multiple clinical trials initiated to reduce the time horizon where one phase was immediately followed by second (Fig. 7).43 The different strategies used in COVID-19 vaccine development is shown in Fig. 8. A list of COVID-19 vaccines is shown in Table 5, while those approved by WHO is shown in Table 6.

Fig. 6.

COVID-19 Vaccine Development (12–24 months).

(0,08MB).
Fig. 7.

Phases in vaccine development.

(0,13MB).
Fig. 8.

The vaccine development strategy used for COVID-19 in India.

(0,27MB).
Table 5.

List of approved vaccines for COVID-19; data retrieved from https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2020/3/covid-19-vaccine-tracker accessed on 23 August 2021.

Vaccine Candidate  Vaccine Type  Primary developers  Country of Origin 
Comirnaty (BNT162b2  mRNA-based vaccine  Pfizer, BioNTech, Fosun Pharma  Multinational 
Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine(mRNA-1273)  mRNA-based vaccine  Moderna, NIAID, BARDA  US 
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca (AZD1222); also known as Vaxzevria and Covishield  Adenovirus vaccine  BARDA, OWS  UK 
Sputnik V  Recombinant adenovirus vaccine (rAd26 and rAd5)  Gamaleya Research Institute, Acellena Contract Drug Research and Development  Russia 
Sputnik Light  Recombinant adenovirus vaccine (rAd26)  Gamaleya Research Institute, Acellena Contract Drug Research and Development  Russia 
COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen (JNJ-78436735; Ad26.COV2.S)  Non-replicating viral vector  Janssen Vaccines (Johnson & Johnson)  The Netherlands, US 
CoronaVac  Inactivated vaccine (formalin with alum adjuvant)  Sinovac  China 
BBIBP-CorV  Inactivated vaccine  Beijing Institute of Biological Products; China National Pharmaceutical Group (Sinopharm)  China 
EpiVacCorona  Peptide vaccine  Federal Budgetary Research Institution State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology  Russia 
Convidicea (PakVac, Ad5-nCoV)  Recombinant vaccine (adenovirus type 5 vector)  CanSino Biologics  China 
Covaxin (BBV152)  Inactivated vaccine  Bharat Biotech, ICMR; Ocugen; ViroVax  India 
WIBP-CorV  Inactivated vaccine  Wuhan Institute of Biological Products; China National Pharmaceutical Group (Sinopharm)  China 
CoviVac  Inactivated vaccine  Chumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune and Biological Products  Russia 
ZF2001 (ZIFIVAX)  Recombinant vaccine  Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical, Institute of Microbiology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences  China, Uzbekistan 
QazVac (QazCovid-in)  Inactivated vaccine  Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems  Kazakhstan 
Unnamed vaccine candidate  Inactivated vaccine  Minhai Biotechnology Co.; Kangtai Biological Products Co. Ltd.  China 
Unnamed vaccine candidate  Inactivated vaccine  Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical Biology  China 
COVIran Barekat  Inactivated vaccine  Shifa Pharmed Industrial Group  Iran 
Abdala (CIGB 66)  Protein subunit vaccine  Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology  Cuba 
Soberana 02  Conjugate vaccine  Finlay Institute of Vaccines; Pasteur Institute  Cuba, Iran 
MVC-COV1901  Protein subunit vaccine  Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corp.; Dynavax  Taiwan 
Table 6.

List of COVID-19 vaccines approved by World Health Organization (WHO).

Vaccine Name  Manufacturer  Vaccine Type  Date of approval by WHO 
BNT162b2/COMIRNATYTozinameran (INN)  Pfizer BioNTech  Nucleoside modified mRNA  31 December 2020 
Covishield (ChAdOx1_nCoV-19)  Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd.  Recombinant ChAdOx1adenoviral vector encodingthe Spike protein antigen ofthe SARS-CoV-2.  15 February 2021 
Vaxzevria (ChAdOx1-S [recombinant])  AstraZeneca + University of Oxford  Chimpanzee Adenovirus encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Spike glycoprotein (ChAdOx1-S)  15 February 2021 
mRNA-1273 Or Spikevax  Moderna  mNRA-based vaccineencapsulated in lipidnanoparticle (LNP)  30 April 2021 
Ad26.COV2.S  Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies and Johnson & Johnson  Recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 (Ad26) vectored vaccine encoding the (SARS-CoV-2) Spike (S) protein  12 March 2021 
CoronaVac  Sinovac  Inactivated, produced inVero cells  1 June 2021 
BBIBP-CorV  Sinopharm  Inactivated, produced inVero cells  7 May 2021 

Vaccine based on live -attenuated SARS-CoV-2 virus

  • DelNS1-SARS-CoV-2-RBD by University of Hong-Kong

DelNS1-SARS-CoV-2-RBD by University of Hong Kong is an example of vaccine based on attenuated or weakened SARS-CoV-2 virus. This vaccine uses flu vector to express a particular antigen to induce immunity targeting the critical element of Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2. DelNS1-SARS-CoV-2-RBD is one of the 5 vaccine technologies by China's Ministry of Science and Technology.66 This live attenuated vaccine (LAV), cultivated in the chick embryo or Madin Darby Canine Kidney Cells (MDCK cells) and administered intranasally.17

Vaccine based on inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus

SARS-CoV-2 is inactivated or killed by using different chemical techniques and the candidate vaccines under this group are injected intramuscularly.67

  • CoronaVaC by Sinovac Biotech

    It is a purified SARS-CoV-2, inactivated vaccine candidate which was previously known as PiCoVacc. It is designed by cultivating the SARS-CoV- 2 CN2 Strain inside Vero cells and in activating it with β-propiolactone. According to the preclinical trials it stimulates SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) in Rhesus Macque, rats and mice.68 On June 1, CoronaVaC vaccine was approved by WHO for emergency use listing (EUL) and finally approved for use in 26 countries on June 9, 2021. According to data from Brazilian trial this vaccine has an efficiency rate of 50.4% for prevention of symptomatic infection.

  • Covaxin Bharat Biotech India

    The research name of Covaxin is BBV152. It is India's indigenous vaccine developed in collaboration with ICMR (Indian Council of Medical Research) and NIV (National Institute of Virology). It has been approved by 9 countries which include India, Iran, Mauritius, Mexico, Nepal, Guyana, Paraguay, Zimbabwe and Philippines.

  • BBIBP-CorV vaccine by Sinopharm

    It is an inactivated vaccine developed by Beijing Bio-Institute of Biological products from strain.69 It is a Chinese state-owned company uses inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus and the clinical trials showed that it had an efficacy rate of 79%. For the development of BBIBP-CorV, the researchers obtained three variants of coronavirus from patients, and the variants which multiplies fast in monkey kidney cells was selected. β-propiolactone is used to inactivate coronaviruses and hence it doesn't replicate inside the host. The proteins (including spike) of coronavirus remains intact hence, further mixed with a small amount of adjuvant (aluminum based compound) to boost response.70 This vaccine completed its phase III in Argentina, Bahrain, Egypt, Morocco, Pakistan, Peru and UAE and on 7th May, 2021, WHO listed Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use.

Vaccine based on SARS-CoV-2 protein subunit

  • Novavax (NVX-CoV2373)

    The Novavax COVID-19 vaccine, NVX-CoV2373, a type of protein subunit vaccine uses nanoparticle based vaccine, designed by Novavax and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). These vaccines are under trial in India under the brand name Covovax.71 This US based Novavax Inc. has a manufacturing contract with Serum Institute of India.

    This vaccine is designed by creating an engineered baculovirus containing a gene for the modified SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The S-protein was altered by the incorporation of two proline residues hence, stabilizing the pre-fusion form of protein. The baculovirus infects the culture of SF9 mother cells which forms the spike protein and displays it on the cell membranes. Spike proteins are cultivated and assembled onto a synthetic lipid nanoparticle purifying spike protein. Matrix M (based on a saponin) obtained from the soapbark tree (Quillaja saponaria), used as adjuvant in this vaccine.72 These vaccines can be stored and handled at above freezing temperature (35–46 °F) and administered as two intramuscular injections.

Vaccine based on virus-like particle (VLP)

  • Triple Antigen Vaccine by Premas Biotech or Orovax vaccine

    Premas Biotech (India) in collaboration with Oramed Pharmaceuticals (Jerusalem) designed an oral vaccine to be swallowed as a pill instead of being injected. This is a VLP vaccine prototype which acts on 3 surface proteins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus; the spike, the membrane and the envelope protein. Premas known for developing recombinant proteins for vaccine development, such proteins are ‘difficult to express’ proteins (DTE-Ps). The triple proteins of SARS-CoV-2 have been co-expressed in an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae (D-crypt).17

Vaccine based on DNA

  • INO-4800

    This vaccine was developed by Inovio Pharmaceuticals in partnership with Beijing Advaccine Biopharmaceuticals Suzhou. This strategy utilizes codon optimized S protein sequence of SARS-CoV-2 to which an IgE leader sequence is attached.17 The INO-4800 vaccine contains the plasmid pGX9501 encoding the entire length of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2. Inovio's proprietary platform uses CELLECTRA, a brief electrical pulse to open small pores in the cell reversibly to allow the plasmids to enter. INO-4800 can be injected intradermally with subsequent electroporation to transfer DNA plasmid directly into blood cells. According to the Lancet on December 23, 2020, INO-4800 showed excellent safety, tolerability as well as immunogenic in 100% of the vaccinated volunteers by stimulating either the cellular or humoral immune responses or both.

Vaccine based on RNA

  • mRNA − 1273 by Moderna

Spikevax, the brand name of mRNA-1273 vaccine, designed by Moderna, the United States National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). This vaccine comprises of synthetic mRNA enclosed in lipid nanoparticle (LNP) encoding the full length pre fusion stabilized spike protein (S) of SARS-CoV-2, therefore, stimulates a highly S-protein specific antiviral response (Fig. 9).17 This vaccine is designed on the basis of SARS and MERS and administered intramuscularly in deltoid muscle.1,73 The levels of nAb surpassed the levels found in convalescent sera after the administration of 250 μg dose levels.17,74 Initial efficacy assessment of Phase 3 CoV study of mRNA-1273 includes 30,000 subjects consisting of 196 cases of COVID-19 of which 30 cases being severe. The efficacy of this vaccine against COVID-19 was 100% and hence on 30th April, 2021, Moderna COVID-19 vaccine became the fifth vaccine to receive emergency validation from WHO.

  • BNT162b1 (BioNTech|Fosum Pharma| Pfizer)

    It is the first vaccine authorized by FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to prevent COVID-19 on December 11, 2020. On December 31, 2020, the WHO issued an EUL for BNT162b1 vaccine. It is a codon-optimized mRNA vaccine that encodes for the trimerized SARS-CoV-2 RBD.17 It is a liquid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA that encodes optimized SARS-CoV-2 full length spike protein.75 The vaccine displays an elicited immunogenicity as it uses additional T4 fibritin-derived fold on trimerization domain to the RBD antigen.17 The vaccine is based on Germany-baded BioNTech SE proprietary mRNA tech and was co-developed by BioNTech and Pfizer. BioNTech also collaborated with Fosun Pharma on March, 2020 and Fosun Pharma became the strategic partner of BioNTech in China.

Fig. 9.

A pictorial comparison between DNA & mRNA vaccine with regard to their mechanism. DNA vaccine is in the form of circular DNA and contains the spike gene of SARS-COV-2. Electroporation enhances the permeability of plasma membrane which allows the entry of DNA into the cytoplasm and ultimately to nucleus. In nucleus, DNA is transcribed into mRNA which is translated into spike proteins of SARS-COV-2. These proteins are expressed on cell membrane. mRNA vaccines are encapsulated in nanoparticles and are integrated into cytoplasm. Spike proteins are produced which are expressed on cell membrane. These proteins are recognized by antigen presenting cells (APC) which triggers an immunological response.

(0,26MB).
Vaccines based on viral vectors

  • Ad5-nCoV (CanSino Biologics Inc | Beijing Institute of Biotechnology)

    This is a non-replicating viral vector vaccine, administered with a single dose. This vaccine is based on CanSino BIO's adenovirus viral vector vaccine technology. The vaccine is designed by using the Admax system from the Microbix Biosystem.76 The CanSino Biologics Convidicea is a genetically engineered vaccine candidate with the replication defective adenovirus type 5 as the vector to express SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The attenuated adenovirus infects human cell readily, incapable of causing disease and hence, delivers genetic material coding spike protein. Therefore, S proteins are produced which travels to the lymph nodes, where the immediate response produces antibodies.

  • Ad26.COV2.S or Janssen COVID-19 vaccine or Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine

    A non-replicating vaccine developed by Janssen Vaccines in Leiden, Netherlands, and its Belgian parent company Janssen Pharmaceuticals, subordinate of Johnson & Johnson, based on AdVac and PER.C6® technologies. Janssen's AdVac® vectors are genetically modified adenoviruses which mimics components of pathogens. Advac viral vector can induce long-term humoral as well as cellular immune responses. Janssen produces neutralizing antibodies against a range of SARS-CoV-2 variants such as Delta (B.1.617.2) variant, the partially neutralization-resistant Beta (B.1.351) variants, the Gamma (P.1) variants and others, including the Alpha (B.1.1.7), Epsilon (B.1.429), Kappa (B.1.617.1) and D614G variants, the original SARS-CoV-2 strain (WA1/2020) as well as on Omicron variant. This vaccine produces durable immune response for upto 8 months after vaccination.

COVID-19 vaccine status in India

India, the second largest populated country in the world, with several pharmaceutical manufacturing bodies plays a central role in the COVID-19 vaccine development.77 India began administrating COVID-19 vaccines on 16th January, 2021 and the outcome of this vaccination drive reveals 94% of the Indian population has received at least first dose and 86% of the eligible Indian population has received both doses of vaccine.78 The list of COVID-19 vaccines approved in India is shown in Table 7 and in Fig. 10.

Table 7.

List of COVID-19 Vaccines approved in India.

Vaccine Name  Manufacturer  Vaccine Type 
ZyCoV-D  Zydus Cadila  DNA 
mRNA  Moderna  RNA 
Sputnik-V  Gamaleya  Non-Replicating Viral Vector 
Covishield  Serum Institute of India  Non-Replicating Viral Vector 
Covaxin  Bharat Biotech  Inactivated 
AZD1222  Oxford/AstraZeneca  Non-Replicating Viral Vector 
Ad26. COV2. S  Janssen (Johnson & Johnson)  Non-Replicating Viral Vector 
Fig. 10.

Figure showing a. approved vaccines and b. under clinical trial vaccines.

(0,18MB).

India approved Oxford- AstraZeneca (manufactured under license by Serum Institute of India under the trade name Covishield and Covaxin (Tables 8 and 9). The list of individuals vaccinated throughout the country state-wise is shown in Table 10.

Table 8.

List of Indigenous Vaccines of India.

Vaccine Candidate  Manufacturer  Status in India 
Covaxin  Bharat Biotech  Approved 
Zycov-D  Zydus Cadila  Approved 
BECOV  Biological E/ Baylor College of Medicine  Not yet approved 
HGCO19  Gennova (Emcure)  Not yet approved 
BBV154  Bharat Biotech  Not yet approved 
UB-612  Aurobindo/ Covaxx  Not yet approved 
Table 9.

List of Non-Indigenous Vaccines of India or Global Vaccines with Indian Partners.

Vaccine Candidate  Global Vaccine  Indian Partner 
Covishield  AstraZeneca/Oxford  Serum Institute 
Sputnik V  Gamaleya Institute, Russia  Dr Reddy's 
JNJ-78436735  J&J  Biological E 
NVX-CoV2373  Novavax  Serum Institute 
Orovax  Oramed Pharmaceuticals  Premas Biotech 
Tozinameran(BNT162b2)  Pfizer  None 
mRNA-1273  Moderna  None 
Table 10.

Cumulative coverage report of COVID-19 Vaccination (As on 5th May 2022) (Source: www.mohfw.gov.in).

Name of State/UT  No. of adults vaccinated (2nd Dose)  No. of kids vaccinated (2nd Dose)  No. of senior citizens vaccinated (HCW, FLW) (2nd Dose) 
Andaman & Nicobar Islands  3,12,311  24,052  19,854 
Andhra Pradesh  4,33,45,977  3,785,008  22,28,946 
Arunachal Pradesh  7,22,018  32,881  30,120 
Assam  1,95,93,572  824,610  3,87,168 
Bihar  5,43,36,293  3,563,419  10,76,053 
Chandigarh  8,99,701  36,305  39,134 
Chhattisgarh  1,70,30,332  986,036  4,85,864 
Dadra & Nagar Haveli  3,26,469  16,896  4167 
Daman & Diu  2,59,017  15,723  6891 
Delhi  1,38,07,403  1,009,879  6,45,496 
Goa  12,06,313  58,483  40,587 
Gujarat  4,80,63,152  3,394,627  26,24,496 
Haryana  1,81,86,202  759,705  3,84,241 
Himachal Pradesh  56,90,284  399,846  2,75,038 
Jammu & Kashmir  1,01,67,472  891,086  3,90,278 
Jharkhand  1,51,81,022  899,066  3,11,572 
Karnataka  4,83,33,434  2,344,056  17,07,789 
Kerala  2,34,78,782  788,782  15,26,915 
Ladakh  1,83,157  11,939  37,696 
Lakshadweep  55,199  2542  3505 
Madhya Pradesh  5,29,55,202  3,586,205  10,56,773 
Maharashtra  6,90,79,060  3,408,082  22,62,312 
Manipur  11,58,681  48,640  85,597 
Meghalaya  9,99,332  26,928  37,616 
Mizoram  6,45,024  38,888  41,075 
Nagaland  6,63,546  30,787  28,837 
Odisha  2,84,37,883  1,914,820  11,35,482 
Puducherry  6,57,012  47,951  21,076 
Punjab  1,75,58,313  726,407  5,50,865 
Rajasthan  4,41,81,824  2,851,866  17,05,896 
Sikkim  5,02,436  29,364  36,619 
Tamil Nadu  4,48,98,186  2,520,139  8,63,696 
Telangana  2,81,52,478  1,827,455  6,61,422 
Tripura  22,35,887  110,107  98,275 
Uttar Pradesh  13,13,23,510  10,044,968  27,80,016 
Uttarakhand  77,68,162  420,718  4,99,442 
West Bengal  5,94,21,814  3,681,930  25,22,397 
COVAXIN

Covaxin (BBV152), developed by Indian pharmaceutical company Bharat Biotech in collaboration with Indian Council of Research (ICMR) and National Institute of Virology (NIV) is an inactivated vaccine.79 The vaccine designed using whole virion inactivated Vero cell derived technology with a toll- like receptor 7/8 agonist molecule adsorbed to alum (Algel-IMDG).80,81 The NIV-2020-770 strain isolated from ‘Vero CCL-81’ cells with sequence in GISAID (EPI_ISL_420545).82,83 It uses a complete infective SARS-CoV-2 viral particle with RNA surrounded by a protein shell but contain dead virus incapable of infection.84 The vaccine was assigned for Phase I and Phase II human clinical trials by DCGI in July, 2020 with two doses in 28 days.80

Covaxin consists of 6 μg of whole virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 antigen, inactive ingredients such as aluminum hydroxide gel (250 μg), TLR 7/8 agonist (imidazoquinoline) 15 μg, 2-phenoxyethanol 2.5 mg and phosphate buffer saline up to 0.5 ml. The sticks of coronaviruses were produced and soaked with beta-propiolactone. This compound disabled the replicating ability of coronaviruses but their proteins including spike remained intact. Once an individual is being vaccinated some of the inactivated viruses are engulfed by antigen presenting cells. The APCs process and present the coronavirus on its surface for recognition by T-helper cells. When B cell surface proteins latch onto the coronavirus, B cell locks on and pull part all of the virus inside and present coronavirus fragments on its surface. As the B cells get activated it proliferates and produces antibodies that can target the spike proteins.65

In Phase I clinical trial against hCoV-19/India/2020770 (homologous), and two heterologous strains from the unclassified cluster, namely, hCoV-19/India/2020Q111 and hCoV-19/India/2020Q100, BBV152 elicited a remarkable neutralizing antibody response.83 In Phase II clinical trial, with 6 and 3 antigen in imidazoquinoline (TLR7/TLR8 agonist adsorbed on aluminum hydroxide gel), the vaccine exhibited significant results in plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT50)-based assay.81 According to the press release on 3rd March, 2021 of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Phase III results of the Covaxin has shown an interim vaccine efficacy of 81%.

The formulation containing the toll like receptor 7/8 agonist also induced T helper cell 1 based antibody response with elevated levels of SARS-CoV-2 specific interferon gamma and CD4 cells. Covaxin has shown its neutralizing property against the variants- B.1.1.7 (Alpha), P.1- B.1.1.28 (Gamma) & P.2 – B.1.1.28 (Zeta), B.1.617 (Kappa), B.1.351 and B.1.617.2 (Beta & Delta). The efficacy data of Covaxin signifies 65.2% protection against the SARS-CoV-2, B.1.617.2 Delta variant and is 93% effective against severe disease.80

COVISHIELD

Covishield (AZD1222) developed at the Jenner Institute, University of Oxford in UK and licensed from British pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca is a non-replicating viral vaccine. Covishield got first approval for restricted use on January 3, 2021. The AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV- 19 Corona Virus Vaccine (Recombinant), designed at Oxford University consists of a replication deficient chimpanzee adenoviral vector ChAdOx1, with SARS-CoV-2 surface glycoprotein gene.85

The Covisheld vaccine prepared using L-Histidine, L-Histidine hydrochloride monohydrate, Magnesium chloride hexahydrate, Polysorbate 80, Ethanol, Sucrose, Sodium chloride, EDTA and water for injection. The Oxford-AstraZeneca team used a modified version of chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAdOx1) which can enter cells but can't replicate inside them. The vaccine can be refrigerated at 38–46 °F for the vaccine to last at least for 6 months. After the vaccine injection, the adenovirus encounters the cells and affix onto proteins on the cell's surface. The cell swallows up the virus in a bubble and pulls it inside; once the virus gains entry inside, it leaves the bubble and moves to the nucleus, where the cell's DNA is stored. The adenovirus pushes its DNA into the nucleus but it can't replicate itself whereas the coronavirus spike protein copies itself. These protruding spikes and spike protein fragments acts as recognition particles for the immune system. When the vaccinated cell dies, the broken cells contain spike proteins and fragments that can be taken up by antigen presenting cells. B cells may collide with the coronavirus spikes and get activated by helper T cells resulting in antibody formation and prevent infection by blocking the spikes from attaching to other cells.65

The phase 3 trial confirms that the group which received a low first dose vaccination followed by a standard second dose demonstrated 90.0% efficacy while the group which received a standard dose followed by a booster dose showed 62.1% efficacy; the overall efficacy at least 2 weeks after the second dose of vaccine was therefore calculated to be 70.4%.

ZyCoV- D

This is a DNA based vaccine, designed by Ahmedabad based Zydus Cadila in collaboration with National Biopharma Mission (NBM) and the Department of Biotech, Government of India. It is the India's first indigenously developed DNA vaccine. This vaccine has been approved for emergency use in India by DCGI for adults and children above the age of 12 years. This is India's first needle free COVID-19 vaccine which is administered with a disposable needle -free injector. The vaccine contains plasmid that has gene encoding the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.86 The expression and localization of S-protein expressed by ZyCoV-D were assessed using immunofluorescence assay by Dey et al. The immunofluorescence studies with rabbit anti S1 antibody depicted a strong signal in the Vero cells transfected with ZyCoV-D. This study demonstrates the ability of the ZyCoV-D vaccine to express efficiently in mammalian cells and can induce antibodies production.86 ZyCoV-D was assessed in vivo in different animal models and has showed the potential to elicit immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 S antigen. ZyCoV-D can also induce secondary immune response as the serum IgG levels against spike protein detected even after three months after the last dose.86 According to an interim study, the three doses of ZyCoV-D vaccine prevents symptomatic disease in 66% of vaccinated individuals. According to Momin et al., ZyCoV-D vaccine was found to be safe, well tolerated and immunogenic in phase 1 trial.87

HGC019

HGC019, India's first mRNA vaccine made by Pune- based Gennova biopharmaceuticals in collaboration with Seattle-based HDT Biotech Corporation uses bits of genetic code to stimulate an immune response. This mRNA based vaccine candidate contains a short, synthetic version encoding the spike (antigen) protein of SARS-CoV-2. Upon injection into the person's body, the synthetic mRNA taken to muscle cells, where multiple copies of antigen is formed. The mRNA is associated with the lipid inorganic nanoparticle (LION™) which acts as mRNA vaccine delivery system equilibrating the mRNA and also acts as adjuvant. The vaccine is unique as it uses the most prominent mutant of spike protein, D614G. The vaccine is stable at 2–8 °C and uses the absorption chemistry to attach mRNA to the nano-lipid carrier's surface to intensify the release kinetics of mRNA within the cells compared to the encapsulation chemistry. On 24 August, 2021, DCGI gave a nod for phase II/ III trials to HGC019 vaccine after its positive results of Phase I trial.

CORBEVAX

Corbevax (BioE COVID-29 or BECOV2D), a protein subunit vaccine developed by Biological E Limited (BioE) an Indian biopharmaceutical company, American company Dynavax Technologies (DVAX), the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, US. It is a recombinant protein subunit vaccine which uses spike RBD, adsorbed to the adjuvant alum. Four compounds with these components are currently being assessed in Phase I/ II clinical study in India to select the final vaccine candidate to be examined in subsequent Phase III trials. In preclinical models, combination of Alum with Dynavax Technologies Corporation's CpG with N1C1 antigen evoked a highly synergistic, balanced immune response.88

SPUTNIK V

Sputnik V (Gam-COVID-Vac), non-replicating vector vaccine designed by Gamaleya National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. Scientists adjoined the gene for coronavirus spike protein to two types of adenovirus i.e., Ad26 and Ad5 and modified them so that they could penetrate cells but could not replicate. The use of two varying serotypes is a unique technique that provides effective long term immunity and boosts the immune response. The first dose (based on Ad26) is administered and injected on the first day and the second dose (based on Ad5) is administered on the second day to boost immune response.89,90

The vaccine trial from Moscow reported an efficacy of 91.6% after the second dose for all age groups with no unusual side effects.88 Sputnik V's efficacy against the Delta variant was found to be 83.1% and also showed a six times reduction in infection risk as confirmed by Russian Ministry of Health on July, 2021. According to the results of Phase III clinical trials of Sputnik V, after getting the vaccine 98% of people developed humoral immune response and 100% of people developed cellular immune response. Serum Institute of India got the authorization on June 4, 2021 by DCGI to manufacture Sputnik V COVID-19 at its Hadapsar facility.

Vaccination in India is an arduous task with a country having a population that covers 1.3 billion people. Free vaccination to everyone in India is being provided to all above the age of 18 from June, 21 as per the announcement by Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi. While the vaccine program is gaining momentum in India, trust in vaccine by the people and their acceptances among the citizens are key determinants of the success of any vaccination program. Across the globe there are sections of people who are facing vaccine hesitancy with myths and misinformation's circulating on different platforms. Government of India is already running several awareness campaigns to establish trust for vaccination among people and dispel hesitancy. To streamline the process of vaccination, Indian government developed a digital platform Co-Win where one could book an appointment for vaccination, get the trusted information and check the status of vaccines.89

Effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine on Variant of Concern (Omicron)

Omicron represents a highly mutated version of SARS-CoV-2.90 The Technical Advisory Group on SARS-CoV-2 (TAG-VE) of WHO classified the B.1.1.529 strain known as omicron as a Variant of Concern (VOC). Omicron was first detected in South Africa in November, 2021.91 As per data of Global Science and Primary Sources (GISAID), 4992 omicron sequences have been reported by 57 countries till December, 2021. Omicron is worrisome variant as it has more than 50 mutations, out of which 30 are spike protein mutations. 15 mutated sites are located within the receptor-binding domain (RBD), the portion which interacts with host cells before entry inside the cell and hence an increase in transmission rate of infection is possible.92

Spike protein sequences analysis led to identification of two sub clades of omicron. Sub-Clade 1 has a lower sequence frequency and has mutation at three sites, namely 417 K, 440 N and 440 G. Sub-clade II has a high occurrence globally and has mutation sites at 417 N, 440 K and 446 S. Omicron shares several common mutation with delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, however many additional mutations can increase the infectivity rate of this variant. As per scientific data available till date, no evidence suggests that omicron has a greater severity than other VOCs. However, many issues such as increased transmission rate, virulence, elevated risk reinfection and possible decline in efficacy of vaccines and other therapeutics remain unresolved. A simulated study involving artificial intelligence (AI) tried to analyze the effect of RBD mutations on the infectivity of omicron and efficacy of available vaccines. The study showed that mutation involving N440K, T478K and N510Y might increase infectivity of omicron by 2–10 times in comparison to delta variant.93 Studies have also shown that omicron can cause reinfection at a greater rate.94,95

The idea that omicron variant can evade vaccine-mediated immunity remains unclear, however sudden spike in omicron positivity rate together with greater number of hospitalization in South Africa remain a major concern and further studies are required.96 In order to counter omicron variant, Pfizer and BioNtech are preparing to alter their mRNA vaccine shots.27,38,86 Pfizer aims to identify escape variant in omicron in order to design omicron specific vaccine. However, lack of scientific data suggests that it will be too early to make any conclusions regarding efficacy of existing vaccines against omicron variant.

Current landscape and market size for vaccine development in India

A lot of struggle around the globe has resulted in development of vaccines in last 60 years. World Health Organization (WHO) helped the world with its outreach programme to bring vaccines to poor population also. These strategies helped in prevention of spread of many contagious diseases. India, being the world's largest supplier of vaccines produces 62% of global demand. India's pharmaceutical industry started growing significantly since 2012. Earlier, India's pharmaceutical market share was less than desirable at $ 500 million which reached to $ 1.3 billion in 2019. This growth in share was due to the increase in vaccine development and outreach programmes.

India, the largest vaccine producer, currently exports two-thirds of its production while rest one-third is used domestically. Since growth in production has increased significantly, the Indian pharmaceutical industry is expected to reach 65 billion USD by 2024. The low cost production as well as the research and development in vaccines as well as pharmaceuticals contribute towards country's cost. The vaccines and pharmaceuticals produced in India are not only effective but 33% less costly than other markets. This cost effectiveness results in high export as well as its reach ability to the poor section of the country.

India's vaccine industry can grow upto $4 billion from $2 billion due to its growing vaccine as well as pharmaceutical industry as per the report by global consulting firm Kearney, in collaboration with the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII). India needs to accelerate its momentum in using sound biotech strategies in investments, research and developments as well as start-ups so as to reach its goal. This needs support from private, academia as well as government sector.

Ethical concern in COVID-19 vaccine development

The urgent demand for the production of effective vaccine against COVID-19 arises question on the efficacy and safety of the vaccine. While a lot more research is still needed to actually check the immunogenicity of the vaccine candidates many vaccines are approved for humans. The experts and scientists working in this field are giving their best to produce effective vaccine against COVID-19 as many vaccines are under trial and many approved. To meet the demands of vaccine there is a rush and this can compromise with the effectiveness of the vaccine and any loophole can result in loss of trust in vaccines.

To combat the risk of COVID-19 infection, the only way is acquiring herd immunity among population. Hence, to meet the demand it is required for everyone to get vaccinated, first the more vulnerable group followed by rest of the population. In India, major population has been vaccinated with all the doses of vaccine and administers should ensure for rest of the boosters doses to administered on time.

The emergence of different variants of SARS-CoV-2 is now a major concern for the effectiveness of the vaccine, as vaccines developed so far used earlier variants of SARS-CoV-2. The researchers and scientists still believe the earlier developed vaccines will still work on new variants may be with less efficacy. Several studies suggested BNT162b2 to be effective against new variants but with less efficacy. Also, the mRNA-1273 vaccine proved to be more effective for beta variant but with short span of immune response.

The major concern in vaccine development is the proper distribution of vaccines to every citizen of the country with proper trials. India, has tried to vaccinate every individual with requisite doses on priority basis, as health care workers and aged people were vaccinated first followed by the young people. Several volunteers worked to educate about the importance of vaccines and for equal distribution in all parts of India.

COVID-19 and autoimmune diseases

COVID-19 is linked with autoimmune disorders raising concern about the long term effect on human health. Hence, a good understanding of the complications of COVID-19 in autoimmune disorders patients is urgently required to guide researchers and doctors in treating patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), infammatory bowel disease (IBD), systemic sclerosis (SSc), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and others. The main reason behind the concern of COVID-19 in autoimmune disease patients is the treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, which can increase the susceptibility to COVID-19. Several studies on patients with autoimmune disorders showed the impact of COVID-19 on these patients.97,98 Tan et al. 2021 reported that majority of autoimmune disorder patients died within 30 days of hospitalization with COVID-19. Autoantibodies were recovered in some patients with COVID-19 and some people developed autoimmune disorders after suffering from COVID-19.99 To reduce the COVID-19 infections, vaccination is the only possible treatment. Some studies reported the occurrence of autoimmune diseases like immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, autoimmune liver diseases, Guillain-Barré syndrome, IgA nephropathy, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus in persons getting COVID-19 vaccine.100 As per WHO guidelines regarding COVID-19 vaccine, few people can get minor side effects including autoimmune disorders upon vaccination. These autoimmune disorders meet the criteria for diagnóstic of Adjuvant-Induced Autoimmune Syndrome (ASIA syndrome).101 The probable reason behind these autoimmune disorders is the molecular mimicry and hence formation of autoantibodies. There is still scanty information on whether the autoimmune disorders are caused by COVID-19 vaccines or mere a chance effect and studies need to be done in this regard. Geisen et al. reported the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines as safe with no considerable side effects.102 These studies open new avenues for searching a relationship between immune system, COVID-19, its vaccine and autoimmune disorders.

COVID-19 and cancer

COVID-19 becomes a serious concern for not autoimmune disease patients but more chronic for cancer patients. Cancer patients are at higher risk of complications due to COVID-19 and it increases more in aged people. In this pandemic era, cancer patients are more susceptible to infection as they are immunocompromised and also due to their treatment. The immunosuppression in cancer patients leads to serious complications as they are more prone to infections and may require early treatment if diagnosed with COVID-19. Cancer patients are nearly 3.5 fold more prone to COVID-19 infections with increased risk of hospitalization and ventilation.103 Cancer treatment during the COVID period is also a major concern as chances of infection increase and several events can occur like septic shock, myocardial infarction, respiratory distress syndrome and others. The risk of nosocomial infection also increases in cancer patients due to hospitalization. The development of COVID-19 vaccines and their randomized trials resulted in high level of safety and efficacy but the trial did not included immunocompromised individuals like cancer patients. As the cancer patients are more prone to infections, many countries prioritize vaccines for them. These patients show reduced cellular as well as humoral immune responses as treated with chemotherapy and immunosuppressive treatments.104 There are very less clinical studies on the impact of these vaccines on cancer patients. A report by National COVID Cohort Collaborative suggested that individuals with cancer and vaccinated are more prone to severe infection than individuals without cancer and vaccinated.105 The infections were more serious in individuals with hematological malignancy as well as those getting immunosupressive therapies. Earlier several vaccination studies in patients with cancer against diseases like influenza, hepatitis B and others proved these patients require more than one dose of vaccine, being immunocompromised. For instance, study on influenza vaccine showed two doses to be more effective in cancer patients rather than one showing more immunogenicity.106 Similar studies showed two doses to be effective against hepatitis B infection in cancer patients. These studies suggest increasing the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses in cancer patients as they are less immunocompetent. mRNA vaccines show more effective response than adenovirus vector based vaccines.107 Hence, regular interval of vaccination is an useful tool against COVID-19 in cancer patients.

Discussion

Sudden emergence of COVID-19 disease has become a serious concern of human health worldwide. Hence, development of antiviral therapeutics are exigent to combat COVID-19 infection. Major symptoms of SARS CoV-2 infection include severe respiratory distress, sore throat, dyspnea, fever, cough etc. Infection of this disease starts within 2 days and it may continue upto 14 days. Generally the transmission of COVID-19 spread through human to human contact or by inanimate matter that have been infected to SARS CoV-2 (based on the recommendation of centre for disease control and prevention).108,109,111

Earlier studies have shown that hesitancy towards vaccine creates a major threat to the public health globally, as the resurgence of measles and pertussis.112–116 The crucial stage in development of vaccine is not only in developing the vaccine but its efficacy and safety. Previously, traditional ways of vaccine development was a labour intensive process because immunological correlation such as identification and investigation of immunogenic agent were needed.117,118 The vaccine development using modern techniques requires enormous testing regarding safety and efficacy of the vaccine. Several scientific community and agencies are working for the development of efficient coronavirus vaccine around the globe. Agencies like Moderna and the Vaccine Research Centre are together developing an mRNA-based vaccine candidate, where mRNA is coated with lipid vesicle for easy incorporation and also Codagenix is working in collaboration with the Serum Institute of India to develop live attenuated viral vaccine. The companies like Novavax, Sichuan Clover Biopharmaceuticals, iBio, and the University of Queensland are in process of developing S glycoprotein targeted vaccine. Several strategies like the viral vector-based vaccines, targeting the S glycoprotein are still under process to be developed into efficient vaccine for COVID-19.

Several vaccine candidates are now in Phase 3 clinical trials, including AstraZeneca/AZD1222, Oxford's Moderna's mRNA1273, and Sinovac's CoronaVac vaccines. With many expecting a COVID-19 vaccine to be available by the end of 2020 or early 2021, it is still too seen that how the vaccine distribution takes place how national interests will play out, or whether the vaccine will ultimately prove to be effective and safe when injected to the global population at large.117

Six biotech enterprises in India alone, including Serum Institute of India, Zydus Cadila, Biological E, Indian Immunologicals, Bharat Biotech, and Mynvax, are collaborating with several worldwide vaccine makers. They are developing DNA vaccines, live attenuated recombinant measles vaccines, inactivated viral vaccines, subunit vaccines, and vaccines created using codon optimization (Coronavirus, 2020). Furthermore, academic institutions such as the National Institute of Immunology (NII), the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) New Delhi, the Translational Health Science and Technology Institute (THSTI), and others are working to develop vaccines, therapies, and SARS-CoV-2 animal models in order to halt the pandemic as soon as possible.119 A detailed map showing the vaccination rate, number of approved and in trial vaccines from India is shown in Fig. 12.

The current research focus has been on the design and manufacture of epitope-based peptide vaccines using various immunoinformatics prediction approaches. The traditional method of producing an effective vaccine needs extensive research, identification, and creation of an immunological link with SARS-CoV-2. In general, the development of peptide vaccines necessitates the identification of immunodominant B-cell and T-cell epitopes capable of producing specific immunological responses. Furthermore, for a peptide vaccine to be highly immunogenic, a target molecule's B-cell epitope must be paired with a T-cell epitope. T-cell epitopes are typically made up of 8–20 amino acids (small peptide fragments) and have been found to be more desirable, resulting in a long-lasting immune response mediated by CD8+ T-cells,120–123 whereas B-cell epitopes are made up of a lineal chain of amino acids that can be a protein.122–125 Several articles are published each year on vaccines against different viruses as shown in Fig. 13.

Finally, a vaccine needs to be properly tested and without knowing the effectiveness of the vaccine candidate and associated risk of its side effect, it can be dangerous. The durability and efficacy of a vaccine should be first target in developing a vaccine against COVID-19.

Current challenges and future prospect

In this current pandemic situation several agencies accelerated their vaccine development program in 6–12 months which usually takes 10–15 years. This reduces the trial period for the vaccine as phase trials are done on smaller groups, which itself is a great challenge in vaccine development. The occurrence of side effects due to less trial phase especially in people with co-morbidity is a major challenge but the vaccines developed in India till date did not produce any side effects. The major challenges posed by some of the COVID-19 vaccines is shown in Table 11.

Table 11.

Some challenges faced by COVID-19 vaccines.

Vaccine  Challenge 
Covaxin  Efficacy around 78% (1) 
ZyCoV- D  Efficacy around 67% (aged 12 years or older) (2) 
Sputnik V  91.6% 
CoronaVaC  Efficacy around 83.5% (Trial III in Turkey) (3) 
BBIBP-CorV  Less efficiency of only 50–70% 
NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax)  Efficacy around 90.4% (aged 18–84 years) (4) 
mRNA −1273 (Moderna)  Low antibody titer against Beta variant, 94.1% (adult 18 years or older) (5) 
BNT162b2  Efficacy around 95% (aged 16 years to older) (6,7) 
Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen)  Efficacy around 66.9% (aged 18 years or older) (8) 
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222  70–76% (18 year or older) (9,10) 

In this current situation, the occurrence of different variants of SARS-CoV-2 like alpha, delta and omicron with high infectivity rate is a matter of concern. The vaccines developed till date were against the earlier variants of SARS-CoV-2, but still researchers and scientists across the globe suggest the vaccines to be equally effective against the new variants too. The emergence of new variants over time will always be a matter of concern on the effectiveness of vaccines.

There is also a concern of discrepancy in distribution of vaccines equally to developed and developing nations. However, several organizations including WHO is trying to lower this discrepancy still it is matter of concern. The developed countries preordered the vaccine doses but developing nations could not order and hence till date developed nations are completely vaccinated whereas developing nations still need more vaccines. So, this discrepancy in vaccination can lead to further spread of this virus.

The proper vaccination of children is also a major challenge as majority of the vaccines have been tried on adults itself. But according to many organizations including WHO, vaccination of children is also important to stop the spread of this pandemic. Many vaccines are under trial for children and in future can be developed to vaccinate the children and hence break the chain of spread of this virus. The ongoing large scale vaccination programme produces huge amount of biomedical and plastic wastes worldwide and, therefore, triggering adverse effect on the environment. The main objective of the mass vaccination campaign is to exit the emergency situation arising as a result of COVID-19 pandemic. However, the vaccination approach created an intense knock-on-effects on the environment. The mass vaccination waste of used discarded vials has thimerosal-mercury based preservative which is found to be hazardous to aquatic ecosystem as well as humans when released improperly in the water bodies. The reckless use of PPE as a preventive measure to COVID-19 has significantly added to the microplastic fibers in the environment.126,127 On the other hand, positive impact of COVID- 19 induced lockdown has also been reported in the recent studies that have shown that significant reduction in many pollutants around the world during the period of lockdown. The lockdown exhibited the better solutions for the nature's rejuvenation by means of natural resource preservation which is prerequisite for sustainable development.128,129

Although COVID-19 vaccines have reduced the chances of infection and hence mortality still certain problems needs to be resolved in the future. The development of mix and match vaccine and the development of new vaccines such as nanoparticle vaccines, adding different adjuvants to improve vaccine and changing the vaccine administration route are some points to be resolved in future. The safety of vaccine for infants, pregnant women and immunocompromised individuals is a matter of future concern to curb this disease completely. The variant of concerns are always emerging and hence a major concern in the future. These mutations are common and problematic and needs to be considered prior to any vaccine development. So, it is essential to consider these mutations while administering vaccines as several vaccines have shown fewer efficacies against certain SARS-CoV-2 variants. Although the COVID-19 vaccines have proved efficient in both animal studies and clinical trials, and several vaccines have been authorized for emergency use by the WHO, adverse effects including pain at the injection site and fever, and some major complications such as coagulation dysfunction, myocarditis, immune disorders, nervous disorder and lymphatic system diseases caused by COVID-19 vaccine, calls for concerns about vaccine safety. The future prospect to be followed and monitored is shown in Fig. 11. The rate of these complications is low as it occurs mainly in individuals with underlying diseases. So to reduce these risks healthcare workers should ensure the lives of the patients by the timely treatment of complications.

Fig. 11.

Futuristic approach in development of effective vaccine after approval.

(0,16MB).
Fig. 12.

Map showing percentage of people fully vaccinated, number of authorized/approved vaccines and number of vaccines under trial in India. Map was retrieved from https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/trials-vaccines-by-country/.

(0,24MB).
Fig. 13.

The figure represents the publication trend of COVID-19 as well as vaccine articles in the year 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022. The data was obtained from NCBI and PubMed using SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Vaccine, Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and COVID-19 vaccine as keywords.

(0,18MB).
Conclusion

COVID-19, a transmissible disease has become a major threat to mankind worldwide. The world witnessed a tremendous collapse of economy, burdened healthcare workers, rising unemployment and a major health catastrophe. The development of COVID-19 vaccine is a major challenge and only definitive solution to curb the viral infections. The catastrophic impact of COVID-19 catalyzed the vaccine development around the globe and the exceptional advancement in vaccine development has brought the hope throughout the world that the battle against this deadly virus can be won in the near future. India's COVID-19 vaccination drive started on January 16, 2021 and today India has become the fastest country in the vaccination program with global mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. It is also important to monitor the long-term efficiency and safety of the authorized vaccines as well as analyze different strategies of combining vaccines that might elicit levels of neutralizing antibodies.

Moreover, not only vaccine candidate rather the mechanism of virus infection to the host needs to be explored to completely curb this infection from the world. A trans-multi-disciplinary workforce is required to reduce, understand and hence stop this viral infection. As all across the globe first line of vaccine designing has been done and many are in progress, it is necessary to reduce the rate of virus infection and to stop the reoccurrence of this infection. It is also necessary to understand the immunopathology and other important aspects of this virus like its host specific impact and vulnerability of aged people.

Meanwhile, many vaccine candidates are being tried and several vaccines are under trial to reduce the infection of coronavirus. This review sheds light on the different vaccine strategies being used nowadays. Also, this review tried to compare the traditional and the modern vaccine strategies. Vaccine design is an important aspect and antigen candidate needs to be explored along with vaccine delivery system before massive production of the vaccine. To provide proper immunization, on one side the vaccine developed so far needs to be produced massively and different grades of vaccine needs to be tried for their immunogenicity on various populations.

Acknowledgements

None.

References
[1.]
B. Hu, H. Guo, P. Zhou, Z.L. Shi.
Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 [published correction appears in Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022 Feb 23].
Nat Rev Microbiol, 19 (2021), pp. 141-154
[2.]
M.A. Shereen, S. Khan, A. Kazmi, N. Bashir, R. Siddique.
COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses.
[3.]
C.A. de Haan, L. Kuo, P.S. Masters, H. Vennema, P.J. Rottier.
Coronavirus particle assembly: primary structure requirements of the membrane protein.
[4.]
M. Cascella, M. Rajnik, A. Aleem, S.C. Dulebohn, R. Di Napoli.
Features, Evaluation, and Treatment of Coronavirus (COVID-19). 2021 Jul 30. StatPearls [Internet].
StatPearls Publishing, (2021),
[5.]
O. Sharma, A.A. Sultan, H. Ding, C.R. Triggle.
A review of the progress and challenges of developing a vaccine for COVID-19.
[6.]
N.C. Achaiah, S.B. Subbarajasetty, R.M. Shetty.
R0 and Re of COVID-19: can we predict when the pandemic outbreak will be contained?.
Indian J Crit Care Med, 24 (2020), pp. 1125-1127
[7.]
S. van Boheemen, M. de Graaf, C. Lauber, et al.
Genomic characterization of a newly discovered coronavirus associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in humans.
mBio., 3 (2012),
[8.]
M. Czub, H. Weingartl, S. Czub, R. He, J. Cao.
Evaluation of modified vaccinia virus Ankara based recombinant SARS vaccine in ferrets.
Vaccine., 23 (2005), pp. 2273-2279
[9.]
L. Du, Y. He, Y. Zhou, S. Liu, B.J. Zheng, S. Jiang.
The spike protein of SARS-CoV--a target for vaccine and therapeutic development.
Nat Rev Microbiol, 7 (2009), pp. 226-236
[10.]
W. Song, M. Gui, X. Wang, Y. Xiang.
Cryo-EM structure of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein in complex with its host cell receptor ACE2.
[11.]
L.E. Gralinski, V.D. Menachery.
Return of the Coronavirus: 2019-nCoV.
[12.]
L. Dai, G.F. Gao.
Viral targets for vaccines against COVID-19.
Nat Rev Immunol, 21 (2021), pp. 73-82
[13.]
F.K. Yoshimoto.
The Proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2 or n-COV19), the Cause of COVID-19.
Protein J, 39 (2020), pp. 198-216
[14.]
S.E. Park.
Epidemiology, virology, and clinical features of severe acute respiratory syndrome -coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus Disease-19).
Clin Exp Pediatr, 63 (2020), pp. 119-124
[15.]
Z. Xu, L. Shi, Y. Wang, et al.
Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome [published correction appears in Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Feb 25].
Lancet Respir Med, 8 (2020), pp. 420-422
[16.]
S.P. Kaur, V. Gupta.
COVID-19 Vaccine: a comprehensive status report.
[17.]
W. Li, M.J. Moore, N. Vasilieva, et al.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus.
Nature., 426 (2003), pp. 450-454
[18.]
I. Glowacka, S. Bertram, M.A. Müller, et al.
Evidence that TMPRSS2 activates the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein for membrane fusion and reduces viral control by the humoral immune response.
J Virol, 85 (2011), pp. 4122-4134
[19.]
S. Matsuyama, N. Nagata, K. Shirato, M. Kawase, M. Takeda, F. Taguchi.
Efficient activation of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein by the transmembrane protease TMPRSS2.
J Virol, 84 (2010), pp. 12658-12664
[20.]
A. Shulla, T. Heald-Sargent, G. Subramanya, J. Zhao, S. Perlman, T. Gallagher.
A transmembrane serine protease is linked to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor and activates virus entry.
J Virol, 85 (2011), pp. 873-882
[21.]
M. Hoffmann, H. Kleine-Weber, S. Schroeder, et al.
SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor.
Cell., 181 (2020), pp. 271-280.e8
[22.]
W. Sungnak, N. Huang, C. Bécavin, et al.
SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes.
Nat Med, 26 (2020), pp. 681-687
[23.]
L. Zou, F. Ruan, M. Huang, et al.
SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients.
N Engl J Med, 382 (2020), pp. 1177-1179
[24.]
X. He, E.H.Y. Lau, P. Wu, et al.
Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19 [published correction appears in Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1491-1493].
Nat Med, 26 (2020), pp. 672-675
[25.]
A. Parasher.
COVID-19: current understanding of its pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatment.
Postgrad Med J, 97 (2021), pp. 312-320
[26.]
N.K. Arora, M.K. Das.
COVID-19 vaccine development and the way forward.
Indian J Public Health, 64 (2020), pp. S108-S111
[27.]
F.J. Martín Sánchez, M. Martínez-Sellés, J.M. Molero García, et al.
Insights for COVID-19 in 2023.
Rev Esp Quimioter, 36 (2023), pp. 114-124
[28.]
B. Pirouz, S. Shaffiee Haghshenas, B. Pirouz, S. Shaffiee Haghshenas, P. Piro.
Development of an assessment method for investigating the impact of climate and urban parameters in confirmed cases of COVID-19: a new challenge in sustainable development.
[29.]
H. Qi, S. Xiao, R. Shi, et al.
COVID-19 transmission in Mainland China is associated with temperature and humidity: a time-series analysis.
[30.]
M. Şahin.
Impact of weather on COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey.
[31.]
Y. Zhu, J. Xie, F. Huang, L. Cao.
Association between short-term exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 infection: Evidence from China.
[32.]
Á. Briz-Redón, Á. Serrano-Aroca.
A spatio-temporal analysis for exploring the effect of temperature on COVID-19 early evolution in Spain.
[33.]
P. Shi, Y. Dong, H. Yan, et al.
Impact of temperature on the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China.
[34.]
J. Xie, Y. Zhu.
Association between ambient temperature and COVID-19 infection in 122 cities from China.
[35.]
S. Abdullah, A.A. Mansor, N.N.L.M. Napi, et al.
Air quality status during 2020 Malaysia Movement Control Order (MCO) due to 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pandemic.
[36.]
D. Carrington.
Air pollution linked to far higher Covid-19 death rates, study finds.
[37.]
S. Muhammad, X. Long, M. Salman.
COVID-19 pandemic and environmental pollution: A blessing in disguise?.
[38.]
J.J. Lau, S.M.S. Cheng, K. Leung, et al.
Real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron BA.2 variant in a SARS-CoV-2 infection-naive population.
Nat Med, 29 (2023), pp. 348-357
[39.]
Y. Ma, Y. Zhao, J. Liu, et al.
Effects of temperature variation and humidity on the death of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China.
[40.]
V.M. Kumar, S.R. Pandi-Perumal, I. Trakht, S.P. Thyagarajan.
Strategy for COVID-19 vaccination in India: the country with the second highest population and number of cases.
[41.]
A.J. Pollard, E.M. Bijker.
A guide to vaccinology: from basic principles to new developments [published correction appears in Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 Jan 5].
Nat Rev Immunol, 21 (2021), pp. 83-100
[42.]
N. Yashvardhini, Jha D.K. Samiksha.
Pharmacological intervention of various Indian Medicinal plants in combating COVID-19 infection.
Biomed Res Ther, 8 (2021), pp. 4461-4475
[43.]
S. Kashte, A. Gulbake, S.F. El-Amin Iii, A. Gupta.
COVID-19 vaccines: rapid development, implications, challenges and future prospects.
Hum Cell, 34 (2021), pp. 711-733
[44.]
M.S. Khuroo, M. Khuroo, M.S. Khuroo, A.A. Sofi, N.S. Khuroo.
COVID-19 vaccines: a race against time in the middle of death and devastation!.
J Clin Exp Hepatol, 10 (2020), pp. 610-621
[45.]
X. Dai, Y. Xiong, N. Li, C. Jian.
Vaccine Types.
Intechopen, (2019),
[46.]
D.K. Jha, N. Yashvardhini, A. Kumar.
Immunological and mutational analysis of SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins from Asian countries.
Biomed Res Ther, 8 (2021), pp. 4367-4381
[47.]
K. Singh, S. Mehta.
The clinical development process for a novel preventive vaccine: An overview.
J Postgrad Med, 62 (2016), pp. 4-11
[48.]
M.G. Hudgens, P.B. Gilbert, S.G. Self.
Endpoints in vaccine trials.
Stat Methods Med Res, 13 (2004), pp. 89-114
[49.]
A.S. Clem.
Fundamentals of vaccine immunology.
J Global Infect Dis, 3 (2011), pp. 73-78
[50.]
F. Thomas, T.P. Magill.
Vaccination of human subjects with virus of human influenza.
Exp. Biol. Medicine, 33 (1936),
[51.]
S. Nooraei, H. Bahrulolum, Z.S. Hoseini, et al.
Virus-like particles: preparation, immunogenicity and their roles as nanovaccines and drug nanocarriers.
J Nanobiotechnol, 19 (2021), pp. 59
[52.]
C.C.D. Joe, S. Chatterjee, G. Lovrecz, et al.
Glycoengineered hepatitis B virus-like particles with enhanced immunogenicity.
Vaccine., 38 (2020), pp. 3892-3901
[53.]
L. Zhai, R. Yadav, N.K. Kunda, et al.
Oral immunization with bacteriophage MS2-L2 VLPs protects against oral and genital infection with multiple HPV types associated with head & neck cancers and cervical cancer.
Antivir Res, 166 (2019), pp. 56-65
[54.]
F. Shiri, K.E. Petersen, V. Romanov, Q. Zou, B.K. Gale.
Characterization and differential retention of Q beta bacteriophage virus-like particles using cyclical electrical field-flow fractionation and asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation.
Anal Bioanal Chem, 412 (2020), pp. 1563-1572
[55.]
M.M. Silveira, G.M.S.G. Moreira, M. Mendonça.
DNA vaccines against COVID-19: Perspectives and challenges.
[56.]
D. van Riel, E. de Wit.
Next-generation vaccine platforms for COVID-19.
Nat Mater, 19 (2020), pp. 810-812
[57.]
A.M. Henao-Restrepo, A. Camacho, I.M. Longini, et al.
Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine in preventing Ebola virus disease: final results from the Guinea ring vaccination, open-label, cluster-randomised trial (Ebola Ça Suffit!).
Lancet., 389 (2017), pp. 505-518
[58.]
Xiaoxia Dai, Yongmin Xiong, Na Li, Can Jian.
Submitted: September 20th, 2018 Reviewed: January 22nd, 2019.
[59.]
L. Zhou, R. Srisatjaluk, D. Justus, R. Doyle.
On the origin of membrane vesicles in Gram-negative bacteria.
FEMS Microbiol Lett, 163 (1998), pp. 223-228
[60.]
M.F. Haurat, J. Aduse-Opoku, M. Rangarajan, L. Dorobantu, M.R. Gray, M.A. Curtis, et al.
Selective sorting of cargo proteins into bacterial membrane vesicles.
J Biol Chem, 286 (2011), pp. 1269-1276
[61.]
A.J. McBroom, A.P. Johnson, S. Vemulapalli, M.J. Kuehn.
Outer membrane vesicle production by Escherichia coli is independent of membrane instability.
J Bacteriol, 188 (2006), pp. 5385-5392
[62.]
M. Li, H. Zhou, C. Yang, Y. Wu, X. Zhou, H. Liu, Y. Wang.
Bacterial outer membrane vesicles as a platform for biomedical applications: an update.
J Control Release, 323 (2020), pp. 253-268
[63.]
M. O'Ryan, J. Stoddard, D. Toneatto, J. Wassil, P.M. Dull.
A multi-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB): the clinical development program.
[64.]
K. Dhama, K. Sharun, R. Tiwari, et al.
COVID-19, an emerging coronavirus infection: advances and prospects in designing and developing vaccines, immunotherapeutics, and therapeutics.
Hum Vaccin Immunother, 16 (2020), pp. 1232-1238
[65.]
J. Pallesen, N. Wang, K.S. Corbett, et al.
Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114 (2017), pp. E7348-E7357
[66.]
Y. Li, R. Tenchov, J. Smoot, C. Liu, S. Watkins, Q. Zhou.
A comprehensive review of the global efforts on COVID-19 vaccine development.
ACS Cent Sci, 7 (2021), pp. 512-533
[67.]
G. Forni, A. Mantovani.
COVID-19 Commission of Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rome. COVID-19 vaccines: where we stand and challenges ahead.
Cell Death Differ, 28 (2021), pp. 626-639
[68.]
P. Ball.
The lightning-fast quest for COVID vaccines - and what it means for other diseases.
Nature., 589 (2021), pp. 16-18
[69.]
K. Dhama, K. Sharun, R. Tiwari, et al.
COVID-19, an emerging coronavirus infection: advances and prospects in designing and developing vaccines, immunotherapeutics, and therapeutics.
Hum Vaccin Immunother, 16 (2020), pp. 1232-1238
[70.]
J. Pallesen, N. Wang, K.S. Corbett, et al.
Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114 (2017), pp. E7348-E7357
[72.]
Q. Gao, L. Bao, H. Mao, et al.
Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2.
Science., 369 (2020), pp. 77-81
[73.]
S. Xia, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, et al.
Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial.
Lancet Infect Dis, 21 (2021), pp. 39-51
[74.]
J. Corum, C. Zimmer.
How the Sinopharm Vaccine Works.
[77.]
Anon.
Moderna Announces Positive Interim Phase 1 Data for its mRNA Vaccine (mRNA-1273) Against Novel Coronavirus.
[78.]
F.P. Polack, S.J. Thomas, N. Kitchin, et al.
Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.
N Engl J Med, 383 (2020), pp. 2603-2615
[79.]
F. Zhu.
CanSino Biologics' Ad5-nCoV the First COVID-19 Vaccine to Phase II Clinical Trials.
TrialSiteNews. Jiangsu Province Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, (2020),
[80.]
K. Thiagarajan.
COVID-19: India is at centre of global vaccine manufacturing, but opacity threatens public trust.
BMJ, 372 (2021),
[81.]
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
[82.]
K. Thiagarajan.
What do we know about India's Covaxin vaccine?.
[84.]
R. Ella, K.M. Vadrevu, H. Jogdand, et al.
Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: a double-blind, randomised, phase 1 trial [published correction appears in Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):e81].
Lancet Infect Dis, 21 (2021), pp. 637-646
[85.]
Y. Yan, Y. Pang, Z. Lyu, et al.
The COVID-19 vaccines: recent development, challenges and prospects.
[86.]
G. Sapkal, P.D. Yadav, R. Ella, et al.
Neutralization of VUI B.1.1.28 P2 variant with sera of COVID-19 recovered cases and recipients of Covaxin an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine.
J Travel Med, 28 (2021),
[87.]
K.M. Vadrevu et al., Evaluation of Safety and Immunogenicity of an Adjuvanted, TH-1 Skewed, Whole Virion InactivatedSARS-CoV-2 Vaccine - BBV152. bioRxiv 2020.S.
[88.]
M. Voysey, S.A.C. Clemens, S.A. Madhi, et al.
Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK [published correction appears in Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):98].
[89.]
V. Thakur, R.K. Ratho.
OMICRON (B.1.1.529): A new SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern mounting worldwide fear.
J Med Virol, 94 (2022 May), pp. 1821-1824
[90.]
Omicron variant: what you need to know, CDC, (2021),
[91.]
Science Brief: Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant.2021 CDC. Accessed December 4, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/scientific-brief-omicron-variant.htm.
[92.]
J. Chen, R. Wang, N.B. Gilby, G.W. Wei.
Omicron variant (B.1.1.529): infectivity, vaccine breakthrough, and antibody resistance.
J Chem Inf Model, 62 (2022 Jan 24), pp. 412-422
[93.]
J.R.C. Pulliam, C. van Schalkwyk, N. Govender, et al.
Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection associated with emergence of the Omicron variant in South Africa.
[94.]
COVID-19 reinfection study from South Africa yields ominous data about Omicron, Science AAAS, (2021),
[97.]
S. Akber Abbasi, A.B. Khalil, M. Arslan.
Extensive use of face masks during COVID-19 pandemic: (micro-)plastic pollution and potential health concerns in the Arabian Peninsula.
Saudi J Biol Sci, 27 (2020 Dec), pp. 3181-3186
[98.]
E.H. Tan, A.G. Sena, A. Prats-Uribe, et al.
COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune diseases: characteristics and outcomes in a multinational network of cohorts across three countries.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 60 (2021), pp. SI37-SI50
[99.]
Y. Liu, A.H. Sawalha, Q. Lu.
COVID-19 and autoimmune diseases.
Curr Opin Rheumatol, 33 (2021), pp. 155-162
[100.]
Y. Chen, Z. Xu, P. Wang, et al.
New-onset autoimmune phenomena post-COVID-19 vaccination.
Immunology., 165 (2022), pp. 386-401
[101.]
P.L. Gomez, J.M. Robinson.
Vaccine manufacturing.
[102.]
U.M. Geisen, D.K. Berner, F. Tran, et al.
Immunogenicity and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions and immunosuppressive therapy in a monocentric cohort.
Ann Rheum Dis, 80 (2021), pp. 1306-1311
[103.]
W. Liang, W. Guan, R. Chen, et al.
Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China.
Lancet Oncol, 21 (2020), pp. 335-337
[104.]
A. Fendler, E.G.E. de Vries, C.H. GeurtsvanKessel, et al.
COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer: immunogenicity, efficacy and safety.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 19 (2022), pp. 385-401
[105.]
Q. Song, B. Bates, Y.R. Shao, et al.
Risk and outcome of breakthrough COVID-19 infections in vaccinated patients with cancer: real-world evidence from the national COVID cohort collaborative.
J Clin Oncol, 40 (2022), pp. 1414-1427
[106.]
B. Rousseau, P. Loulergue, O. Mir, et al.
Immunogenicity and safety of the influenza A H1N1v 2009 vaccine in cancer patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy: the VACANCE study.
Ann Oncol, 23 (2012), pp. 450-457
[107.]
A. Thakkar, J.D. Gonzalez-Lugo, N. Goradia, et al.
Seroconversion rates following COVID-19 vaccination among patients with cancer.
Cancer Cell, 39 (2021), pp. 1081-1090.e2
[108.]
T. Momin, K. Kansagra, H. Patel, et al.
Safety and Immunogenicity of a DNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (ZyCoV-D): Results of an open-label, non-randomized phase I part of phase I/II clinical study by intradermal route in healthy subjects in India.
EClinicalMedicine., 38 (2021),
[109.]
I. Jones, P. Roy.
Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine candidate appears safe and effective.
Lancet., 397 (2021), pp. 642-643
[111.]
N. Yashvardhini, A. Kumar, D.K. Jha.
Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 mutations in the main viral protease (NSP5) and its implications on the vaccine designing strategies.
Vacunas., 23 (2022), pp. S1-S13
[112.]
J.F.-W. Chan, S. Yuan, K.-H. Kok, et al.
A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster.
7e Lancet, 395 (2020), pp. 514-523
[113.]
N. Chen, M. Zhou, X. Dong, et al.
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.
[114.]
Q. Li, X. Guan, P. Wu, et al.
Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirusinfected pneumonia.
7e New England J Med, 382 (2020), pp. 1199-1207
[115.]
V.K. Phadke, R.A. Bednarczyk, D.A. Salmon, S.B. Omer.
Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States: a review of measles and pertussis.
JAMA, 315 (2016), pp. 1149-1158
[116.]
O. Benecke, S.E. DeYoung.
Anti-vaccine decision-making and measles resurgence in the United States.
Glob Pediatr Health, (2019), pp. 6
[117.]
E.J. Gangarosa, A.M. Galazka, C.R. Wolfe, L.M. Phillips, R.E. Gangarosa, E. Miller, R.T. Chen.
Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story.
[118.]
N. Yashvardhini, D.K. Jha, A. Kumar, et al.
Genetic variations in the Orf7a protein of SARS-CoV-2 and its possible role in vaccine development.
Biomed Res Ther, 8 (2021), pp. 4497-4504
[119.]
R.C. Borba, V.M. Vidal, L.O. Moreira.
The re-emergency and persistence of vaccine preventable diseases.
An Acad Bras Cienc, 87 (2015), pp. 1311-1322
[120.]
N. Yashvardhini, D.K. Jha, A. Kumar, et al.
Genome sequence analysis of SARS-CoV-2 nsp15.
Bioinformation., 18 (2022), pp. 432-437
[121.]
N. Yashvardhini, D.K. Jha, S. Bhattacharya.
Identification and characterization of mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase as a promising antiviral therapeutic target.
Arch Microbiol, 203 (2021), pp. 5463-5473
[122.]
D.K. Jha, N. Yashvardhini, A. Kumar.
Identification of recurrent mutations in exonuclease (nsp14); a potential drug target in SARS-CoV-2.
Indian J Pathol Microbiol, 64 (2021), pp. 771-775
[123.]
O. Sharma, A.A. Sultan, H. Ding, C.R. Triggle.
A review of the progress and challenges of developing a vaccine for COVID-19.
[125.]
N. Yashvardhini, A. Kumar, D.K. Jha.
Immunoinformatics identification of B- and T-cell epitopes in the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of SARS-CoV-2.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol, 2021 (2021), pp. 6627141
[126.]
O.O. Fadare, E.D. Okoffo.
Covid-19 face masks: A potential source of microplastic fibers in the environment.
Sci Total Environ, (2020 Oct 1), pp. 140279
[127.]
N. Yashvardhini, A. Kumar, M. Gaurav, et al.
Positive impact of COVID-19 induced lockdown on the environment of India's national capital, Delhi.
Spat Inf Res, 30 (2022), pp. 249-259
[128.]
A. Dey, T.M. Chozhavel Rajanathan, H. Chandra, et al.
Immunogenic potential of DNA vaccine candidate, ZyCoV-D against SARS-CoV-2 in animal models.
Vaccine., 39 (2021), pp. 4108-4116
[129.]
D.K. Jha, N. Yashvardhini, Kumar A. Samiksha.
Rejuvenating impact of COVID-19 lockdown on major environmental parameters: an Indian perspective [published online ahead of print, 2022 Nov 29].
Spat Inf Res, (2022), pp. 1-13
Copyright © 2023. Elsevier España, S.L.U.. All rights reserved
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos