Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[Abernathy and Clark, 1993]
W. Abernathy, K. Clark.
Innovation: Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction.
Research Policy, 22 (1993), pp. 102-122
[Abernathy and Utterback, 1978]
W. Abernathy, J.M. Utterback.
Patterns of Innovation in Industry.
Technology Review, 80 (1978), pp. 40-47
[Agarwal and Bayus, 2002]
R. Agarwal, B.L. Bayus.
The market evolution and sales takeoff of product innovations.
Management Science, 48 (2002), pp. 1024-1041
[Agarwal et al., 2002]
R. Agarwal, M.B. Sarkar, R. Echambadi.
The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: An industry life cycle approach.
Academy of Management Journal, 45 (2002), pp. 971-994
[Alcácer and Chung, 2007]
J. Alcácer, W. Chung.
Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers.
Management Science, 53 (2007), pp. 760-776
[Allen, 1977]
T. Allen.
Managing the Flow of Technology.
MIT Press, (1977),
[Anderson and Tushman, 1990]
P. Anderson, M. Tushman.
Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990), pp. 604-635
[Arora et al., 2001]
A. Arora, A. Fosfuri, A. Gambardella.
Markets for Technology: Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy.
MIT Press, (2001),
[Arrow, 1962]
K. Arrow.
Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.
The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pp. 609-625
[Bohlmann et al., 2002]
J.D. Bohlmann, P. Golder, D. Mitra.
Deconstructing the pioneer's advantage: Examining vintage effects and consumer valuations of quality and variety.
Management Science, 48 (2002), pp. 1175-1195
[Chesbrough, 2003]
H. Chesbrough.
Open Innovation.
Harvard Business School Press, (2003),
[Christensen, 1997]
C.M. Christensen.
The innovator's dilemma.
Harvard Business School Press, (1997),
[Clark, 1985]
K.B. Clark.
The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution.
Research Policy, 14 (1985), pp. 235-251
[Cohen and Levinthal, 1990]
W.M. Cohen, D.A. Levinthal.
Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990), pp. 128-152
[Di Stefano et al., 2010]
G. Di Stefano, M. Peteraf, G. Verona.
Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: a bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain.
Industrial and Corporate Change, 19 (2010), pp. 1187-1204
[Dougherty, 1992]
D. Dougherty.
Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms.
Organization Science, 3 (1992), pp. 182-202
[Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000]
K.M. Eisenhardt, J.A. Martin.
Dynamic capabilities: What are they?.
Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2000), pp. 1105-1121
[Foster, 1986]
R. Foster.
Innovation: The attacker's advantage.
Summit Books, (1986),
[Franco et al., 2009]
M. Franco, M. Sarkar, R. Agarwal, E. Echambadi.
Swift and Smart: The Moderating Effects of Technological Capabilities on the Market Pioneering-Firm Survival Relationship.
Management Science, 55 (2009), pp. 1842-1860
[Furman and Stern, in press]
Furman, J. and Stern, S (in press). Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research. Management Science.
[Garud et al., 2002]
R. Garud, S. Jain, A. Kamaraswamy.
Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java.
Academy of Management Journal, 45 (2002), pp. 196-214
[Gorman et al., 1997]
G. Gorman, D. Hanlon, W. King.
Some research perspectives on entrepreneurship education, enterprise education and education for small business management: a ten-year literature review.
International Small Business Journal, 15 (1997), pp. 56-78
[Gort and Klepper, 1982]
M. Gort, S. Klepper.
Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations. Economic Journal.
Royal Economic Society, 92 (1982), pp. 630-653
[Griliches, 1992]
Z. Griliches.
The search for RandD spillovers.
The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94 (1992), pp. 29-47
[Henderson and Clark, 1990]
M.R. Henderson, K.B. Clark.
Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990), pp. 9-31
[Kaplan and Tripsas, 2008]
S. Kaplan, M. Tripsas.
Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change.
Research Policy, 37 (2008), pp. 790-805
[Lieberman and Montgomery, 1988]
M.B. Lieberman, D.B. Montgomery.
First-mover advantages.
Strategic Management Journal, 9 (1988), pp. 41-58
[Lieberman and Montgomery, 1998]
M.B. Lieberman, D.B. Montgomery.
First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with resource-based view.
Strategic Management Journal, 19 (1998), pp. 1111-1125
[Long and O'Mahony, 2010]
E. Long, S. O'Mahony.
Nexus Work: Brokerage on Creative Projects.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 55 (2010), pp. 47-81
[McGahan, 2004]
A. McGahan.
How Industries Evolve.
Harvard Business School Press, (2004),
[Mitchell, 1991]
W. Mitchell.
Dual clocks: Entry order influences onincumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value.
Strategic Management Journal, 12 (1991), pp. 85-100
[Murmann and Frenken, 2006]
J.P. Murmann, K. Frenken.
Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change.
Research Policy, 35 (2006), pp. 925-952
[Pavitt, 1984]
K. Pavitt.
Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory.
Research Policy, 13 (1984), pp. 343-373
[Pisano, 2006]
G. Pisano.
Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution.
Research Policy, 35 (2006), pp. 1122-1130
[Pontikes, 2008]
E.G. Pontikes.
Fitting in or starting new? An analysis of invention, constraint, and the emergence of new categories in the software industry. Working paper.
The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, (2008),
[Roberts, 1968]
E. Roberts.
A Basic Study of Innovators: How to Keep and Capitalize on Their Talents.
Research Management, XI, (1968),
[Rosa et al., 1999]
J.A. Rosa, J.R. Porac, J. Runser-Spanjol, M.S. Saxon.
Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market.
Journal of Marketing, 63 (1999), pp. 64-77
[Rosenbloom and Cusumano, 1987]
R.S. Rosenbloom, M.A. Cusumano.
Technological pioneering and competitive advantage: The birth of the VCR industry.
California Management Review, 29 (1987), pp. 51-76
[Santos and Eisenhardt, 2009]
F.M. Santos, K.M. Eisenhardt.
Constructing markets shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields.
Academy of Management Journal, 52 (2009), pp. 643-671
[Schilling, 2002]
M. Schilling.
Technology success and failure in winner takes all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities.
Academy of Management Journal, 45 (2002), pp. 387-398
[Schon, 1966]
D. Schon.
Technology and Change: The New Heraclitus.
Delacorte Press, (1966),
[Schumpeter, 1942]
J. Schumpeter.
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.
2. a, Harper and Brothers, (1942),
[Shane, 2008]
S.A. Shane.
Illusions of Entrepreneurship: The Costly Myths that Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Policy Makers Live By.
Yale University Press, (2008),
[Shane and Ulrich, 2004]
S. Shane, C. Ulrich.
Technological Innovation. Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science (50th Anniversary Article).
Management Science, 50 (2004), pp. 133-154
[Simcoe, in press]
Simcoe, T. (in press). Standard Setting Committees: Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms. American Economic Review.
[Solow, 1957]
R.M. Solow.
Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.
Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (1957), pp. 312-320
[Suarez et al., 2011]
F.F. Suarez, S. Grodal, A. Gotsopoulos.
Entry-Timing Advantages and the Categorical Dynamics of the Industry Life Cycle.
Boston University Working Paper, (2011),
[Suarez and Lanzolla, 2007]
F.F. Suarez, G. Lanzolla.
The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage theory.
Academy of Management Review, 32 (2007), pp. 377-392
[Suarez and Utterback, 1995]
F. Suarez, J. Utterback.
Dominant designs and the survival of firms.
Strategic Management Journal, 16 (1995), pp. 415-430
[Teece, 1986]
D.J. Teece.
Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy.
Research Policy, 15 (1986), pp. 285-305
[Tushman and Rosenkopf, 1992]
M. Tushman, L. Rosenkopf.
Organizational determinants of technological change: towards a sociology of technological evolution.
Research in Organizational Behavior, 14 (1992), pp. 311-347
[Utterback and Abernathy, 1975]
J. Utterback, W. Abernathy.
A dynamic model of product and process innovation.
Omega, 3 (1975), pp. 639-656
[Von Hippel, 1994]
E. Von Hippel.
The Sources of Innovation.
Oxford University Press, (1994),
[Von Hippel, 2005]
E. Von Hippel.
Democratizing Innovation.
MIT Press, (2005),
[Wagner and Cockburn, 2010]
S. Wagner, I. Cockburn.
Patents and the Survival of Internet-related IPOs.
Research Policy, 39 (2010), pp. 214-228
Copyright © 2012. AEDEM