metricas
covid
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition) VINCat program: Impact of a surveillance program on alcohol-based hand rub consu...
Journal Information
Vol. 43. Issue S1.
The VINCat Program: a 19-year model of success in infection prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections in Catalonia, Spain
Pages S98-S105 (May 2025)
Visits
100
Vol. 43. Issue S1.
The VINCat Program: a 19-year model of success in infection prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections in Catalonia, Spain
Pages S98-S105 (May 2025)
Original article
Full text access
VINCat program: Impact of a surveillance program on alcohol-based hand rub consumption in acute care facilities in Catalonia, Spain
Programa VINCat: monitorización del consumo de soluciones hidroalcohólicas en los hospitales de atención aguda en Cataluña, España
Visits
100
Esther Morenoa,b,c,
Corresponding author
emoreno@csapg.cat

Corresponding author.
, Montse Blascod,e, Charo Porrónf, Gemina Santanac,g, Maria Sardàh, Ana Felisa Lópezc,i, Alexander Almendralf, Enric Limónf,j,k, Miquel Pujoll,m,n, on behalf of VINCat Programme Hand Hygiene Group 1
a Doctoral Program in Nursing and Health, Faculty of Nursing, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
b Department of Infectious Diseases, Consorci Sanitari Alt Penedès-Garrafc, Barcelona, Spain
c VINCat Program Coordinator Hand Hygiene Objective, Catalonia, Spain
d Infection Control Nurse and Safety Patient, Fundació Hospital d’Olot Comarcal de la Garrotxa, Olot, Spain
e VINCat Program Hand Hygiene Objective, Catalonia, Spain
f VINCat Programme Surveillance of Healthcare Related Infections in Catalonia, Departament de Salut, Barcelona, Spain
g Preventive and Epidemiology Department Nurse of Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
h Infection Control Nurse, Hand Hygiene Reference, Consorci Sociosanitari de Vilafranca, Vilafranca del Penedès, Spain
i Department of Infectious Diseases, Sant Joan de Reus University Hospital, Reus, Spain
j Department of Public Health, Mental Health and Mother–Infant Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
k Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas CIBERINFEC, Instituto Carlos IIIcMadrid, Spain
l Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge – IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
m Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
n VINCat Programme, Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Ver más
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (3)
Show moreShow less
Tables (2)
Table 1. Trends in alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) consumption (liters per 1000 patient-days).
Tables
Table 2. Trends in the prevalence of beds equipped with alcohol-based preparation dispensers at the point of care.
Tables
Show moreShow less
Additional material (1)
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 43. Issue S1

The VINCat Program: a 19-year model of success in infection prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections in Catalonia, Spain

More info
Abstract
Aim

Hand hygiene is regarded as the cornerstone for preventing healthcare-associated infections. This study assesses trends in alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) consumption for hand hygiene and availability of dispensers at the point of care (POC) in acute care hospitals in Catalonia, as part of the VINCat program.

Methods

Data were collected from 2014 to 2022 in 69 hospitals, categorized by size and type, including large, medium, small, and specialized facilities. ABHR consumption was measured in liters per 1000 patient-days, with data segmented into intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICU wards. Hospital infection control personnel determined the availability of ABHR solutions at the POC through yearly point prevalence surveys.

Results

The study found a significant increase in ABHR consumption over time, with usage rising from 22.8L/1000 patient-days in the 2014–2017 period to 39.9L in 2018–2022, representing a 75% increase. The most significant growth was observed in ICUs, where ABHR use nearly doubled. ABHR consumption also spiked during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, with large hospitals showing the highest levels of usage. Additionally, the availability of ABHR dispensers at the POC increased, particularly in non-ICU wards and small hospitals.

Conclusions

The findings underscore the role of sustained hand hygiene efforts, including increased ABHR availability at the POC, as essential components of infection prevention. These efforts are especially crucial in high-risk units such as ICUs and in smaller hospitals, where resources and compliance may be limited.

Keywords:
Hand hygiene
Alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR)
Infection prevention
Resumen
Objetivo

La higiene de manos se considera la piedra angular de la prevención de las infecciones relacionadas con la atención sanitaria. Este estudio evalúa las tendencias en el consumo de soluciones hidroalcohólicas (SHA) y la disponibilidad de dispensadores en el punto de atención (PA) en los hospitales de atención aguda en Cataluña, como parte del programa VINCat.

Métodos

Se recopilaron datos de 2014 a 2022 en 69 hospitales, categorizados por tamaño y tipo, incluyendo grandes, medianos, pequeños y especializados. El consumo de SHA se midió en litros por cada 1.000 días de estancia, con datos segmentados entre unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) y no UCI. La disponibilidad de SHA en el PA se determinó mediante encuestas anuales de prevalencia.

Resultados

Se observó un incremento significativo en el consumo de SHA de 22,8 l por cada 1.000 días de estancia en el período 2014-2017 a 39,9 l en 2018-2022 (incremento del 75%). El mayor aumento se observó en las UCI, donde el uso de SHA casi se duplicó. El consumo de SHA también aumentó considerablemente durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en 2020, con los hospitales grandes mostrando los niveles más altos de uso. Además, la disponibilidad de dispensadores de SHA en el PA aumentó, especialmente en las no UCI y en hospitales pequeños.

Conclusiones

Los hallazgos subrayan la importancia de mantener los esfuerzos en higiene de manos, especialmente en los entornos de alto riesgo y en los hospitales más pequeños, donde los recursos y el cumplimiento pueden ser limitados.

Palabras clave:
Higiene de manos
Solución hidroalcohólica (SHA)
Prevención de infecciones
Full Text
Introduction

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are infections acquired within healthcare settings, often due to invasive procedures performed during patient care.1 These infections represent a significant threat to patient safety, ranking among the most common adverse events in healthcare.2 Additionally, many of these infections are caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms, which pose a significant concern due to their potential for spread and the limited treatment options available.3 The impact of HAIs extends beyond patient safety, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality rates, diminished quality of life, and escalating healthcare costs. As a result, HAIs place a substantial burden on healthcare systems worldwide.4

The 2022 Global Report on Infection Prevention and Control by the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that between 7% and 10% of patients will acquire an HAI during their hospital stay.5 In Catalonia, data from the VINCAT program surveillance system revealed a prevalence of 7.10% of HAIs in acute care hospitals in 2022.6 Considering the nearly 19,000 hospital acute care beds, this figure suggests that thousands of patients are affected by HAIs each year in our region alone.

Notably, the WHO report emphasizes that effective and cost-efficient practices can prevent up to 70% of HAIs. Hand hygiene is considered the cornerstone of HAI prevention and is recognized as the most effective measure to reduce transmission. In 2009, the WHO introduced its “Five Moments” model for hand hygiene, specifically aimed at minimizing the risk of microorganism transmission in hospitals.7 To promote compliance with hand hygiene among healthcare professionals, the WHO recommends implementing multimodal strategies, which include (1) system change through the introduction of alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHR), (2) training and education, (3) evaluation and feedback, (4) reminders in the workplace, and (5) the creation of a safety climate. Moreover, ABHR consumption is a valuable surrogate parameter for hand hygiene performance and can be easily tracked in the healthcare setting.8

A vital component of these strategies is ensuring that ABHR is readily available and accessible at the point of care (POC), where the patient, healthcare worker, and care intersect.9 The placement of ABHR dispensers is critical in promoting hand hygiene practices and improving compliance. Studies have shown that the strategic placement of dispensers can significantly impact compliance rates more than the mere quantity of dispensers available.10 Nonetheless, sustained improvement in hand hygiene compliance requires implementing comprehensive multimodal strategies, where easy access to ABHR is a key aspect of the system change component of the multimodal strategy recommended by the WHO.

This study aims to assess trends in ABHR consumption from 2014 to 2022 and evaluate the availability of ABHR solutions at the POC in acute care hospitals in Catalonia. By analyzing data from the VINCat program, we seek to understand the impact of these efforts on improving hand hygiene compliance and infection prevention practices across different hospital settings.

Methods

The VINCat program, established in 2006 as the infection prevention and control program of HAIs by the Catalan Department of Health, has monitored hand hygiene compliance in Catalan hospitals since 2014.11 Specifically, the program tracks ABHR consumption and availability of dispensers at the POC as indirect indicators of hand hygiene adherence.

ABHR consumption: ABHR consumption was calculated using liters per 1000 patient-days. Leading hospital infection control personnel provided retrospective yearly data on ABHR consumption in each participating hospital from 2014 to 2022. A total of sixty-nine hospitals contributed to the study. Hospitals were categorized by size as follows: large university hospitals (>500 beds, 9 centers), medium hospitals (200–500 beds,18 centers), small hospitals (<200 beds, 37 centers), and specialized hospitals (three oncologic, one urologic, one neurorehabilitation centers). Data were collected annually from each hospital and segmented into two main categories, intensive care units (ICUs) and medical or surgical wards, and compared in two distinct periods: Period 1 (2014–2017) and Period 2 (2018–2022). The hospital infection control personnel determined the availability of ABHR solutions at the POC through yearly point prevalence surveys. Adequate POC for ABHR solutions was developed in a consensus document between the VINCat HM group and the Catalan Association for Infection Control (ACICI) and12 was standardized through VINCat hospitals and considered correct when located less than 2m away from the patient's bed, visible and accessible without barriers or elements that hinder or prevent access.

Ethical issues

The study complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, with international human rights considerations, and with the legislation regulating biomedicine and personal data protection. All data were treated as confidential, and records were accessed anonymously. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Bellvitge Hospital (Ref. PR066/18). Patient data were anonymized, so the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research waived the requirement for informed consent.

Statistical analysis

ABHR consumption was calculated as an incidence rate, expressed in liters per 1000 patient-days. The availability of ABHR dispensers at the POC was reported as a percentage of hospital beds equipped with dispensers. Differences in dispenser prevalence between the two study periods (2014–2017 and 2018–2022) were analyzed using the chi-square test. Crude incidence rate ratios (cIRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare ABHR consumption between the two periods. To evaluate the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between ABHR consumption and the availability of ABHR dispensers at the POC over the years, we performed a Spearman correlation (rho). LOESS smoothing was applied to graphs to better illustrate trends over time in both intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICU wards.

A significance level of 0.05 was applied to all statistical tests. The results were analyzed using the R statistical software version 4.2.2, developed by The R Foundation in Vienna, Austria.

Results

Data on ABHR consumption across different types of hospitals and periods is shown in Table 1. Over the entire study period (2014–2022), the overall consumption was 32.4L/1000 patient-days, with significantly higher usage in ICUs (90.7L/1000 patient-days) compared to non-ICU wards (28.0L/1000 patient-days). Important variations were observed between hospital types. Large hospitals had the highest ABHR consumption (41.4L/1000 patient-days), followed by specialty hospitals (31.7L/1000 patient-days) compared to lower consumption in medium and small hospitals. Overall consumption increased from 22.8L/1000 patient-days in Period 1 to 39.9L/1000 patient-days in Period 2 (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.75 (95% CI: 1.74–1.76), indicating a 75% increase in ABHR use between the two periods. The higher increase between the two periods was observed in ICUs where ABHR use rose from 58.7L/1000 patient-days to 112.0L/1000 patient-days (IRR 1.91). The ICUs from large hospitals showed the highest usage increase from 63.3L/1000 patient-days in Period 1 to 125.7L/1000 patient-days in Period 2 (IRR 1.98) and almost doubled their consumption.

Table 1.

Trends in alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) consumption (liters per 1000 patient-days).

Unit and hospital size  Hospitals  Overall2014–2022Period 12014–2017Period 22018–2022
    Patient-days  L/1000 PD  Hospitals  Patient-days  L/1000 PD  Hospitals  Patient-days  L/1000 PD  cIRR (95% CI) 
Global  69  1,060,407  32,686,816  32.4  66  327,729  14,343,161  22.8  69  732,678  18,343,655  39.9  1.75 (1.74–1.76) 
Large  550,083  13,271,247  41.4  171,741  6,131,594  28.0  378,342  7,139,653  53.0  1.89 (1.88–1.90) 
Medium  18  323,059  11,890,023  27.2  18  100,744  4,985,980  20.2  18  222,315  6,904,043  32.2  1.59 (1.58–1.61) 
Small  37  159,847  6,687,620  23.9  34  47,656  2,896,194  16.5  37  112,191  3,791,426  29.6  1.80 (1.78–1.82) 
Specialty hospital  27,418  837,926  32.7  7,588  329,393  23.0  19,83  508,533  39.0  1.69 (1.65–1.74) 
ICU  37  211,653  2,334,018  90.7  33  54,775  932,735  58.7  39  156,878  1,401,283  112.0  1.91 (1.89–1.92) 
Large  139,293  1,396,873  99.7  36,868  582,059  63.3  102,425  814,814  125.7  1.98 (1.96–2.01) 
Medium  17  64,755  816,385  79.3  17  16,43  304,322  54.0  17  48,325  512,063  94.4  1.75 (1.72–1.78) 
Small  11  7,605  120,76  63.0  1,477  46,354  31.9  11  6,128  74,406  82.4  2.58 (2.44–2.74) 
Non-ICU  69  848,754  30,352,798  28.0  66  272,954  13,410,426  20.4  69  575,8  16,942,372  34.0  1.67 (1.66–1.68) 
Large  410,79  11,874,374  34.6  134,873  5,549,535  24.3  275,917  6,324,839  43.6  1.79 (1.78–1.81) 
Medium  18  258,304  11,073,638  23.3  18  84,314  4,681,658  18.0  18  173,99  6,391,980  27.2  1.51 (1.50–1.52) 
Small  37  152,242  6,566,860  23.2  34  46,179  2,849,840  16.2  37  106,063  3,717,020  28.5  1.76 (1.74–1.78) 
Specialty hospital  27,418  837,926  32.7  7,588  329,393  23.0  19,83  508,533  39.0  1.69 (1.65–1.74) 

L: liters; PD: patient-days; cIRR: crude incidence rate ratio; CI: confidence interval.

The annual consumption of ABHR from 2014 to 2022, categorized by hospital groups, is shown in Fig. 1. Across all hospital sizes, ABHR consumption significantly increased in 2020, coinciding with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2022, global consumption levels returned to figures similar to those observed in 2019. In large hospitals, consumption levels remained higher than in the early study years (2014–2017) but did not exceed levels observed in 2018–2019. For small and specialized hospitals, consumption levels post-2020 either approached or fell below pre-pandemic levels. Fig. 2 illustrates the trends in ABHR consumption between ICUs and non-ICU wards from 2014 to 2022. Overall, ABHR consumption has risen significantly in 2020 in both ICUs and non-ICU wards, with ICUs showing higher levels of use, almost 175L/1000 patient-days. The distribution of ABHR consumption across 69 hospitals, categorized by size: large, medium, small, and specialty hospitals is shown in supplementary Fig. S4. Significant variability in ABHR consumption both within and between hospital size categories.

Fig. 1.

Trends in ABHR consumption categorized by hospital groups from 2014 to 2022.

Fig. 2.

Trends in ABHR consumption between ICUs and non-ICU wards from 2014 to 2022.

The prevalence of hospital beds with ABHR dispensers at the POC, segmented by hospital groups and periods is shown in Table 2. The global prevalence of beds with ABHR dispensers at POC increased from 76.8% in Period 1 to 85.6% in Period 2, indicating a significant rise in availability over time (p<0.001). Focusing on the type of ward, the overall prevalence of dispensers at POC remained stable in ICUs with negligible change between the two periods. Non-ICU units showed a significant increase from 75.3% in Period 1 to 84.5% in Period 2 (p<0.001). The increased availability of dispensers at the POC across all hospital sizes was particularly pronounced in small hospitals (Fig. 3).

Table 2.

Trends in the prevalence of beds equipped with alcohol-based preparation dispensers at the point of care.

Unit and hospital size  Overall2014–2022Period 12014–2017Period 22018–2022p-Valuea 
  Hospitals  Beds  Dispensers  Prevalence (%)  Hospitals  Beds  Dispensers  Prevalence (%)  Hospitals  Beds  Dispensers  Prevalence (%)   
Global  68  121,948  99,633  81.7  66  53,807  41,303  76.8  68  68,141  58,33  85.6  <0.001 
Large  46,547  38,471  82.6  21,148  16,303  77.1  25,399  22,168  87.3  <0.001 
Medium  18  44,39  35,9  80.9  18  19,055  15,082  79.1  18  25,335  20,818  82.2  0.0093 
Small  36  28,696  22,967  80.0  34  12,596  8,992  71.4  36  16,1  13,975  86.8  <0.001 
Specialty hospital  2,315  2,295  99.1  1,008  926  91.9  1,307  1,369  104.7  0.0302 
ICU  35  8,815  8,687  98.5  34  3,413  3,368  98.7  35  5,402  5,319  98.5  0.9555 
Large  4,857  4,749  97.8  1,845  1,816  98.4  3,012  2,933  97.4  0.8146 
Medium  17  3,536  3,475  98.3  17  1,393  1,385  99.4  17  2,143  2,09  97.5  0.7111 
Small  422  463  109.7  175  167  95.4  247  296  119.8  0.1144 
Non-ICU  68  113,133  90,946  80.4  66  50,394  37,935  75.3  68  62,739  53,011  84.5  <0.001 
Large  41,69  33,722  80.9  19,303  14,487  75.1  22,387  19,235  85.9  <0.001 
Medium  18  40,854  32,425  79.4  18  17,662  13,697  77.6  18  23,192  18,728  80.8  0.0073 
Small  36  28,274  22,504  79.6  34  12,421  8,825  71.0  36  15,853  13,679  86.3  <0.001 
Specialty hospital  2,315  2,295  99.1  1,008  926  91.9  1,307  1,369  104.7  0.0302 
a

Pearson chi-squared test.

Fig. 3.

Trends in the availability of ABHR solutions at the point of care, categorized by hospital groups from 2014 to 2022.

Discussion

The study highlights significant trends in ABHR consumption across participating VINCat hospitals, with an overall increase in ABHR use between 2014 and 2022 in all hospital groups. The increase in ABHR use aligns with global initiatives and recommendations from organizations such as the WHO that emphasize the importance of hand hygiene in reducing HAIs.13

The consumption of ABHR varied across different countries in Europe. In a broader European study (PROHIBIT), the median ICU ABHR consumption was 66mL per patient-day, with considerable variation by country. Our findings, with a consumption rate of 90.7L/1000 patient-days in ICUs, place Catalonia among the higher consumers of ABHR in Europe, comparable to Germany but significantly higher than the European mean.14,15

The data analysis suggests that hospital size plays a significant role in ABHR consumption. Larger hospitals demonstrated higher ABHR consumption per patient-day compared to smaller hospitals. This could be attributed to these facilities’ more complex patient care needs and higher patient volumes.

One key observation from the study is the dramatic rise in ABHR consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. The surge in ABHR consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic mirrors global trends, reflecting heightened hand hygiene practices during the crisis. However, by 2022, global consumption levels returned to figures similar to those observed in 2019, suggesting a normalization of hand hygiene practices as the pandemic's immediate impact subsided. This trend was particularly pronounced in small and specialized hospitals, where consumption levels either approached or fell below pre-pandemic figures, potentially due to resource limitations or decreased prioritization of hand hygiene. In contrast, large hospitals demonstrated sustained increases compared to the early study years (2014–2017), although consumption did not exceed 2018–2019 levels. These findings underscore the importance of maintaining robust hand hygiene programs, particularly in smaller facilities, to sustain compliance during non-crisis periods. For instance, a study on COVID-19 and ABHR effectiveness highlighted the critical role of hand hygiene in controlling virus transmission, with WHO-recommended formulations showing strong virucidal activity against SARS-CoV-2.16 This reinforces the heightened ABHR use during the pandemic, as seen in our data and other European countries like Italy, where ABHR consumption peaked in 2020 but decreased significantly by 2022.17

Our study showed a notable improvement in the availability of ABHR dispensers at POC. This increase in availability is crucial as it facilitates compliance with hand hygiene practices by making ABHR more accessible to healthcare workers. The results indicate that more hospitals, especially smaller ones, have made efforts to increase the number of ABHR dispensers, which is an essential component of WHO's multimodal strategy for hand hygiene improvement.7,18

Our study has several strengths, it provides ABHR consumption across a large number of hospitals in Catalonia, representing various hospital sizes and specializations over an extended period. This allows for a robust understanding of long-term trends in hand hygiene practices. Our study has captured the impact of COVID-19 and the significant increase in ABHR consumption. In addition to tracking ABHR consumption, the study evaluates the availability of ABHR dispensers at the POC. This is a key strength as it connects consumption data with accessibility, a vital component of hand hygiene compliance.

Regarding limitations, our study does not include direct observation of healthcare workers’ hand hygiene practices. This could provide a more complete picture of actual compliance. Furthermore, the study relies on data provided by hospital infection control personnel. There is a possibility of inconsistencies in reporting ABHR consumption and dispenser availability, especially given the variability in hospital sizes and resources. Finally, although the study is comprehensive for the region of Catalonia, its findings may not be fully applicable to other regions or countries with different healthcare systems, infection control policies, or levels of resources.

In conclusion, the study demonstrates that the VINCat program has successfully monitored and facilitated improvements in ABHR consumption and availability, contributing to enhanced hand hygiene compliance in Catalonia. The significant increases during the COVID-19 pandemic highlight the impact of global health crises on infection prevention practices.

Future efforts should focus on sustaining progress in high-risk settings such as ICUs while addressing gaps in compliance and accessibility in non-ICU wards, where challenges may still persist.

Funding

The VINCat program is supported by public funding from the Catalan Health Service, Department of Health, Generalitat de Catalunya.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support.

Appendix 1
Members of VINCat Programme Hand Hygiene Group and Infection Control Teams participating in the programme:

Maria José Moreno Martinez and Clara Sala Jofre, Hospital Dos de Maig, Consorci Sanitari Integral; Maria Carmen Alvarez Moya and Vicens Diaz-Brito Fernandez, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu; MªTeresa Ros Prat, Fundació Sant Hospital. La Seu d’Urgell; Elisa Montiu González and María Ramirez Hidalgo, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida; Esther Rodriguez Gías and Montserrat Olona Cabases, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona; Mireia Duch Pedret and Anibal Calderon Collantes, Badalona Serveis Assistencials; Silvia Alvarez and Marta Andrés Santamaria, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa; David Blancas Altabella, Consorci Sanitari Alt Penedès i Garraf - Hospital Sant Camil; Mariló Marimón Morón and Roger Malo Barres, Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya; Alejandro Smithson Amat, Fundació Hospital de l’Esperit Sant; Mª de Gracia García Ramírez and José Vargas-Machuca Fernández, Centre MQ Reus Francisco; Mª Carmen Eito Navasal and Ana Jiménez Zárate, Institut Català d’Oncologia L’Hospitalet; Laura Cabrera Jaime,Institut Català d’Oncologia Badalona; Jessica Rodríguez Garcia, Institut Català d’Oncologia Girona; Sara Burgués Estada and Eduardo Sáez Huerta, Clínica NovAliança de Lleida; Anna Martinez Sibat, Hospital de Campdevànol; Dolors Domenech Bague and Ricardo Gabriel Zules Oña, Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Truet; Anna Escobar Juan and Manel Panisello Bertomeu, Hospital comarcal d’Amposta; Laura Grau Palafox and Marta Andrés Santamaria, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa; Emilien Amar Devilleneuve and Mariona Secanell Espluga, Institut Guttmann; Rosa Laplace Enguídanos, Meritxell Guillemat Marrugat and Alexander Cordoba Castro, Hospital Del Vendrell; Alba Guitard QuerHospital Universitari Santa Maria; Anna Besolí Codina, Patricia Aguilera DiazConsorci hospitalari de Vic; Ana Felisa López Azcona and Simona Iftimie Iftimie, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus; Sandra Aznar Juncà and Carmen Felip Rovira, Clínica Salus Infirmorum; Mª Angels Pages Roura and Maria de la Roca Toda Savall, Hospital de Palamós; Pilar Girbal Portela and Josep Cucurull Canosa, Hospital de Figueres; Carme Ferrer Barberà and Dolors Rodriguez-Pardo, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron; Pilar de la Cruz Sole, Hospital Universitari Dexeus; Alexandra Lucia Moise and Marta Milián sanz, Hospital Pius de Valls; Mercè Claròs Ferret and Irene Sánchez Rodriguez, Hospital Sant Rafael; Irene Boix Gravalosa and Maria Alba Serra Juhé, Hospital d’Olot Comarcal de la Garrotxa; Montserrat Vaqué Franco and Yolanda Meije Castillo, Hospital de Barcelona.SCIAS; Montserrat Rovira Espès and José Carlos de la Fuente Redondo, Hospital Comarcal de Móra d’Ebre; Marie France Domenech Spaneda and Josep Rebull Fatsini, Hospital de Tortosa Verge de la Cinta; Lucrecia López González and Ana Coloma Conde, Consorci Hopitalari Universitari Moises Broggi; Montserrat Brugues Bruges and Judit Santamaria Rodriguez, Consorco Sanitari de l’anoia. Hospital d’Igualada; Nereida Barneda Darias and Eva Palau Gil, Clínica Girona; Demelza Maldonado López, Pilar Marzuelo Fuste and Elisabet Lerma Chippirraz, Hospital General de Granoller; David Pineda Fernández and Rosa Coll Colell, Hospital Universitari Sagrat Cor; Josep Farguell Carreras and Mireia Saballs Nadal, Hospital QuironSalud Barcelona; Ludivina Ibáñez Soriano, Espitau Val d’Aran; Angeles Garcia Flores and Roser Ferrer i Aguilera, Hospital Sant Jaume de Calella and Hospital Comarcal de Blanes; Cristina González Juanes and Juan Pablo Horcajada Gallego, Hoapital del Mar; Núria Bosch Ros, Hospital Sta. Caterina Girona; Anju Ram Devi and Teresa Domenech Forcadell,Clínica Terres de l’Ebre; María Cuscó Esteve and Laura Linares Gonzalez, Consorci Sanitari Alt Penedès i Garraf - Hospital Alt Penedés; Simón Juárez Zapata and Carles Alonso-Tarrés, Fundació Puigvert; Susana Galán Aguallo and Natalia Juan Serra, Centro Médico Teknon; Engracia Fernández Piqueras, Virginia Pomar Solchaga and Joaquin López-Contreras Gonzalez, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau; Olga Melé Sorolla and Cristina Ribó Bonet, Hospital Vithas Lleida; Lidia Martín Gonzalez and Ana Lérida Urteaga, Hospital de Viladecans; Dolors Mas Rubio, Mercè Solà Ferrer and Rafel Perez Vidal, Althaia, Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa. Hospital Sant Joan de Déu de Manresa; Conchita Hernández Magide, Susanna Camps Carmona and Oriol Gasch Blasi, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí de Sabadell; Irma Casas Garcia, Laia Castella Fàbregas and Nieves Sopena Galindo, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol; Elena Vidal Diez and M. Pilar Barrufet Barque, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme. Hospital de Mataró.

Appendix C
Supplementary data

The following are the supplementary data to this article:

Distribution of ABHR consumption across 69 hospitals, categorized by hospital groups, with data from 2014 to 2022.

References
[1]
S.S. Magill, J.R. Edwards, W. Bamberg, Z.G. Beldavs, G. Dumyati, M.A. Kainer, et al.
Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections.
N Engl J Med, 370 (2014), pp. 1198-1208
[2]
B. Allegranzi, S.B. Nejad, C. Combescure, W. Graafmans, H. Attar, L. Donaldson, et al.
Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.
[3]
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Healthcare-associated infections. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/healthcare-associated-infections [last accessed 17.01.25].
[4]
E. Zimlichman, D. Henderson, O. Tamir, C. Franz, P. Song, C.K. Yamin, et al.
Health care-associated infections.
JAMA Intern Med, 173 (2013), pp. 2039
[5]
Global report on infection prevention and control [Internet].
(2022),
[6]
J.M. Badia, P. Barrufet, E. Calbo, A. Besoli, I. Casas, E. Diaz, et al.
Vigilància de les Infeccions relacionades amb l’Atenció Sanitària de Catalunya. Barcelona.
(2022),
[7]
WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care first global patient safety challenge clean care is safer care. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44102/9789241597906_eng.pdf [last accessed 15.01.25].
[8]
E. Tartari, J. Garlasco, M.H. Mezerville, M.L. Ling, H. Márquez-Villarreal, W.H. Seto, et al.
Ten years of hand hygiene excellence: a summary of outcomes, and a comparison of indicators, from award-winning hospitals worldwide.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 13 (2024), pp. 45
[9]
J. Kirk, A. Kendall, J.F. Marx, T. Pincock, E. Young, J.M. Hughes, et al.
Point of care hand hygiene – where's the rub? A survey of US and Canadian health care workers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices.
Am J Infect Control, 44 (2016), pp. 1095-1101
[10]
B.P. Chan, K. Homa, K.B. Kirkland.
Effect of varying the number and location of alcohol-based hand rub dispensers on usage in a general inpatient medical unit.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 34 (2013), pp. 987-989
[11]
F. Gudiol, E. Limón, E. Fondevilla, J.M. Argimon, B. Almirante, M. Pujol.
The development and successful implementation of the VINCat Program.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 30 (2012), pp. 3-6
[12]
Generalitat de Catalunya. Programa de Vigilància de les Infeccions Nosocomials als Hospitals de Catalunya. Informe VINCat 2013. 2013; 2011.(Objectiu 3).
[13]
B. Allegranzi, E. Tartari, D. Pittet.
“Seconds save lives – clean your hands”: the 5 May 2021 World Health Organization SAVE LIVES: Clean Your Hands campaign.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 10 (2021), pp. 55
[14]
S. Hansen, F. Schwab, P. Gastmeier, D. Pittet, W. Zingg, H. Sax, et al.
Provision and consumption of alcohol-based hand rubs in European hospitals.
Clin Microbiol Infect, 21 (2015), pp. 1047-1051
[15]
T.S. Kramer, J. Walter, C. Schröder, M. Behnke, J. Clausmeyer, C. Reichardt, et al.
Increase in consumption of alcohol-based hand rub in German acute care hospitals over a 12-year period.
BMC Infect Dis, 21 (2021), pp. 766
[16]
A. Kratzel, D. Todt, P. V’kovski, S. Steiner, M. Gultom, T.T.N. Thao, et al.
Inactivation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 by WHO-recommended hand rub formulations and alcohols.
Emerg Infect Dis, 26 (2020), pp. 1592-1595
[17]
A. Caramia, D. Petrone, C. Isonne, F. Battistelli, S. Sisi, S. Boros, et al.
Italian National Surveillance of alcohol-based hand rub consumption in a healthcare setting – a three-year analysis: 2020–2022.
[18]
C. Herzer, T. Berg, C. Hegemann, T. Gebhardt, H. Niesalla, C. Senges.
The state of hand rub dispensers in healthcare settings – a multicenter assessment in 19 German healthcare facilities.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 13 (2024), pp. 118

The members of this VINCat Programme Hand Hygiene group appear in Appendix 1.

Copyright © 2025. Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Download PDF
Article options
Tools
Supplemental materials