metricas
covid
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition) How can we optimize the diagnostic and therapeutic approach of pneumonia? Expert...
Journal Information
Vol. 43. Issue 2.
Pages 121-122 (February 2025)
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
How can we optimize the diagnostic and therapeutic approach of pneumonia? Expert opinion-based recommendations. Authors' reply
¿Cómo podemos optimizar el abordaje diagnóstico y terapéutico de la neumonía? Recomendaciones basadas en una opinión de expertos. Respuesta de los autores
Visits
265
Mario Fernández-Ruiza,b, Juan José Castónb,c, José Luis del Pozod, José María Aguadoa,b,
Corresponding author
jaguadog1@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, en representación de los miembros del Grupo OPENIN (“Optimización de procesos clínicos para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de infecciones”)
a Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
b Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
c Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
d Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Servicio de Microbiología Clínica, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text
Dear Editor,

We acknowledge the Letter to the Editor regarding the recommendation for the use of corticosteroids in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and the need for admission to the intensive care unit, included in the document generated from the inaugural meeting of the group OPENIN (Optimización de procesos clínicos para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de infecciones) [Optimisation of clinical processes for the diagnosis and treatment of infections].1 Specifically questioned was the choice of methylprednisolone (at a dose of 0.5&#¿;mg/kg every 12&#¿;hours in the first 24&#¿;hours for no more than 5–7 days) instead of hydrocortisone. In fact, hydrocortisone was the corticosteroid used (at a dose of 200&#¿;mg daily for 4–7 days with progressive reduction until day 14) in the CAPE COD trial, which demonstrated a benefit for the experimental group in terms of mortality and the need for intubation and support with vasoactive drugs.2 In contrast, Meduri et al. found no significant differences in the ESCAPe trial, which was based on the administration of 40&#¿;mg of methylprednisolone daily for 7 days.3 It should be noted that both regimens have comparable anti-inflammatory potency. Different explanations have been suggested, regardless of the type of corticosteroid, to justify these discordant results, such as the demographic characteristics of the patients, the exclusion criteria of the two studies and, in particular, the maximum window allowed from recruitment to the start of corticosteroid treatment (24&#¿;hours in the CAPE COD trial versus 96&#¿;hours in ESCAPe).1 A recent meta-analysis revealed differences in 30-day mortality between patients with CAP who received high cumulative doses (≥400&#¿;mg of prednisone or equivalent) and those treated with lower doses.4 Based on this finding, we proposed a methylprednisolone regimen which, for a patient weighing 70&#¿;kg, would be equivalent to a total dose of 430&#¿;mg of prednisone, although we also recognise the limited evidence available for establishing the optimal regimen.1 Lastly, we would like to emphasise that this recommendation from the group OPENIN is in line with the ERS/ESICM/ESCMID guidelines for the management of severe CAP published in 2023,5 as well as the recent SCCM update on the use of corticosteroids in critically ill patients with severe bacterial CAP.6

Funding

The meeting of the group OPENIN had the financial help of MSD España. The funding source did not participate in the preparation of this manuscript, its contents or the decision to submit it for publication.

References
[1]
M. Fernández-Ruiz, J.J. Castón, J.L. Del Pozo, J. Carratalà, J. Fortún, M. Salavert, et al.
How can we optimize the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to pneumonia? Expert opinion-based recommendations.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed), 42 (2024), pp. 442-452
[2]
P.F. Dequin, F. Meziani, J.P. Quenot, T. Kamel, J.D. Ricard, J. Badie, et al.
Hydrocortisone in severe community-acquired pneumonia.
N Engl J Med, 388 (2023), pp. 1931-1941
[3]
G.U. Meduri, M.C. Shih, L. Bridges, T.J. Martin, A. El-Solh, N. Seam, et al.
Low-dose methylprednisolone treatment in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia.
Intensive Care Med, 48 (2022), pp. 1009-1023
[4]
F. Bergmann, L. Pracher, R. Sawodny, A. Blaschke, G. Gelbenegger, C. Radtke, et al.
Efficacy and safety of corticosteroid therapy for community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized, controlled trials.
Clin Infect Dis, 77 (2023), pp. 1704-1713
[5]
I. Martin-Loeches, A. Torres, B. Nagavci, S. Aliberti, M. Antonelli, M. Bassetti, et al.
ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of severe community-acquired pneumonia.
Intensive Care Med, 49 (2023), pp. 615-632
[6]
D. Chaudhuri, A.M. Nei, B. Rochwerg, R.A. Balk, K. Asehnoune, R.S. Cadena, et al.
Executive summary: guidelines on use of corticosteroids in critically ill patients with sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and community-acquired pneumonia focused update 2024.
Crit Care Med, 52 (2024), pp. 833-836
Copyright © 2024. Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Download PDF
Article options
Tools