Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica Phenotypic and genetic characteristics of fluoroquinolone- and methicillin-resis...
Información de la revista
Vol. 36. Núm. 7.
Páginas 403-408 (Agosto - Septiembre 2018)
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 36. Núm. 7.
Páginas 403-408 (Agosto - Septiembre 2018)
Original article
DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2017.06.006
Acceso a texto completo
Phenotypic and genetic characteristics of fluoroquinolone- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Características fenotípicas y genéticas de Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina y a fluoroquinolonas
Antonio Moreno-Floresa,b,c, Carmen Potel-Alvarellosb,c, Susana Otero-Fernándezb,c, Maximiliano Álvarez-Fernándezb,c,
Autor para correspondencia

Corresponding author.
a Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Spain
b Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Spain
c Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Spain
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Descargar PDF
Figuras (1)
Tablas (3)
Table 1. Staphylococcus aureus isolated between 2009 and 2011 at the University Hospital Complex of Pontevedra (%).
Table 2. Yearly variation of clonal types, SARM (OX)-R and (OX-LEV)-R (%).
Table 3. Multiple comparison in the mutation rate for SARM (OX)-R and (OX-LEV)-R phenotypes.
Mostrar másMostrar menos

Fluoroquinolone resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has increased in recent years. The objective of this study was to characterise two MRSA populations, one susceptible to fluoroquinolones and other resistant identifying the clonal types and the differential characteristics of both MRSA populations.


Molecular typing using PFGE, MLST, spa and SSCmec was performed on 192 MRSA strains isolated from 2009 to 2011, 49 only oxacillin-resistant (OX-R) and 143 oxacillin and levofloxacin-resistant (OX-R-LEV-R). Mutations that conferred resistance to fluoroquinolones, hypermutable phenotypes and the presence of eight microbial surface components recognising adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) were also studied.


A statistically significant increase in the OX-R-LEV-R phenotype was observed (p<0.05). The most common clone of the OX-R isolates was sequence type (ST) 8 (32.6%), followed by ST72 (26.5%) and ST5 (26.5%). In the OX-R-LEV-R phenotype, the ST5 clone was the most common (65.7%), followed by ST72 (15.4%), and ST125 (12.6%). All isolates except the ST398 clone carried the SCCmecIVc. Clones ST5, ST72, ST125, and ST30 had hypermutable phenotypes. The ST72 clone and the ST30 clone in the OX-R phenotype harboured the highest number of MSCRAMMs.


ST5 and ST72 clones were the most frequent clones identified in OX-R-LEV-R phenotype. Both clones showed a hypermutable phenotype that favours their selection as the fluoroquinolone resistant clones. The genetic relationships identified indicate that OX-R-LEV-R clones have evolved from OX-R MRSA clones.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules

La resistencia a fluoroquinolonas en Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina (SARM) se ha incrementado en los últimos años. El objetivo de este estudio consistió en caracterizar 2 poblaciones de SARM, una sensible a fluoroquinolonas y otra resistente identificando los tipos clonales y las características diferenciales entre los mismos.


En un total de 192 SARM aislados entre los años 2009-2011, 49 solo oxacilina resistentes (OX-R) y 143 oxacilina y levofloxacino resistentes (OX-R-LEV-R), se realizó el tipado molecular mediante PFGE, MLST, spa y SSCmec. Además se estudiaron las mutaciones que confieren resistencia a las fluoroquinolonas, los fenotipos hipermutadores y la presencia de 8 componentes de la superficie microbiana que reconocen adhesinas de la matriz extracelular.


En el periodo de estudio se detectó un incremento estadísticamente significativo del fenotipo OX-R-LEV-R (p<0,05). Entre los OX-R el clon ST8 (32,6%) fue el más frecuente seguido de los clones ST72 (26,5%) y ST5 (26,5%). Entre los aislados del fenotipo OX-R-LEV-R, el clon ST5 fue el más frecuente (65,7%), seguido de los clones ST72 (15,4%) y ST125 (12,6%). Todos los aislamientos, excepto el clon ST398, portaban el SCCmec-IVc. Los clones ST5, ST30, ST72 y ST125 presentaron un fenotipo hipermutador. Los clones ST72 y ST30 OX-R son los que poseen una mayor dotación de componentes de la superficie microbiana que reconocen adhesinas de la matriz extracelular.


Los clones ST5 y ST72 fueron los más frecuentes en el fenotipo OX-R-LEV-R. Ambos clones poseían un fenotipo hipermutador. La estrecha relación genética entre los clones OX-R y OX-R-LEV-R pertenecientes al mismo ST sugiere que estos últimos han evolucionado a partir de una población OX-R preexistente.

Palabras clave:
Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina
Componentes de la superficie microbiana que reconocen adhesinas de la matriz extracelular
Texto completo

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes a large number of infections.1 Its ability to adapt and acquire resistance to different antimicrobials has possibly favoured its spread both in hospitals and in the community.1 Methicillin resistance in S. aureus is coded by the mec gene, included in a genomic island called the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). The fluoroquinolones are among the therapeutic agents whose activity is not affected by SCCmec. However, rates of fluoroquinolone resistance have increased,2 mainly due to mutations in genes gyrA and grlA.2

S. aureus expresses surface proteins that are essential for its success both as a commensal and as a pathogen. The most important group of these proteins are the MSCRAMMs (Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules).3

The objective of this study was to analyse the increase in MRSA resistant to fluoroquinolones and its possible relation with a clonal selection. In addition, the characteristics of the MRSA isolates studied were analysed including the phenotypic hypermutability of the identified clones and the MSCRAMMs content.

Materials and methodsSelection of microorganisms and patients for inclusion in the study

The University Hospital Complex of Pontevedra has a catchment population of 296,463. We selected two groups of MRSA isolates from the years 2009 to 2011: (i) those that presented resistance only to beta-lactams (oxacillin, OX-R), being susceptible to all other groups of antimicrobials; and (ii) those with resistance to oxacillin and to levofloxacin OX-R-LEV-R, being susceptible to all other antimicrobial groups. Only one isolate per patient was analysed in the study. A total of 192 isolates were studied. The following patient data were recorded: sex, age, type of sample, underlying diseases and risk factors for MRSA infection. The criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were applied to determine the origin of the MRSA infection.4,5

Bacterial identification and susceptibility to antimicrobials

The biochemical characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates were studied using the commercially available Wider system (Gram Positive MIC/ID Panel, Francisco Soria Melguizo, S.A.). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for fluoroquinolones were determined using the gradient diffusion (epsilon-test) method. Resistance to methicillin was detected using a 30μg cefoxitin disc. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines were followed for the determination of breakpoints and resistance to methicillin.6

Molecular typing of the isolates

For the SCCmec, PFGE, and spa gene typing, the 192 strains included in the study were analysed.

Analysis of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was employed to identify the mecA gene and SCCmec7 type and subtype.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE): cells were processed following the protocol proposed by Murchan et al.8 Gels were analysed using the GelCompar II software (Applied Maths NV), applying the Dice similarity coefficient with an optimisation of 0.5% and tolerance 1%. Banding patterns were assigned to pulsotypes (using uppercase Latin letters) and subtypes (using numerical subindices). Pulsotypes were considered to be different if the coefficient of similarity was less than 80%. Subtypes were defined as pulsotypes with a coefficient of similarity between 80% and 95%.9

spa gene typing: amplification and sequencing of the X region of the spa gene were performed under the conditions described by Harmsen et al.10 The spa type was established using Ridom StaphType software (Ridom GmbH, Würzburg, Germany).

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST): the Enright et al.11 recommendations were followed. A total of 17 strains were studied including one isolate from each of the identified pulsotypes and spa types. The MLSTs of the strains not analysed by this method were deduced from the spa types.

Analysis of the frequency of mutation in the isolates

The frequency of mutations for rifampicin and streptomycin were performed under the conditions described by Trong et al.12 One isolate from each clonal type and one from each phenotype were selected and processed in triplicate. In summary, five OX-R strains including one of each ST5, ST72, ST30, ST8, and ST398, and another five OX-R-LEV-R strains including one of each ST5, ST72, ST30, ST125, and ST22 were studied.

Analysis of mutations in genes coding for fluoroquinolone resistance

The amplification of genes gyrA and grlA was carried out under the conditions described by Schmitz et al.13 A total of 30 strains belonging to the ST5 clone, 22 strains belonging to the ST72, 18 strains from the ST125, 8 strains from the ST22, and 1 strain from the ST30 were studied. Sequence analysis was performed using the BioEdit software, version 7.1.9 (Ibis Therapeutics, Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.).

Detection of genes coding for surface proteins

Based on the relationship between the surface proteins and the S. aureus colonisation, we selected eight genes that coded for surface proteins belonging to the MSCRAMM group3: clfA,14clfB,14fnbA,15fnbB,16cna,15sdrC,14ebpS14 and efb.15 The presence of these genes was determined by PCR under the conditions described by the authors cited for each MSCRAMM studied. The 192 strains included in the study were analysed.

Statistical analysis

The chi square test for trend was used to analyse the years of the study and the OX-R-LEV-R increase. To analyse the mutation rate to streptomycin and rifampicin, the non-parametric test of Mann–Whitney was used to compare two groups of the studied strains. The non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was used for multiple comparisons. A p value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package SPSS 22.0.

ResultsCharacteristics of the isolates and molecular typing of MRSA

Between 2009 and 2011, a total of 2587 S. aureus were isolated; 728 (28.1%) were MRSA. Of the 728 MRSA isolates, 49 (6.7%) were only resistant to beta-lactams (OX-R) and 143 (19.6%) were OX-R-LEV-R (Table 1). Throughout the three years of the study (2009–2011), an increase of 9.1% was identified in OX-R-LEV-R MRSA being statistically significant (p<0.05), whereas OX-R MRSA isolates only increased by 2.1% (Table 1). A total of 60 MRSA were considered community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) strains (31.3%); this community origin was found in 44.9% (n=22) of the OX-R phenotype and in 26.6% (n=38) of the OX-R-LEV-R phenotype.

Table 1.

Staphylococcus aureus isolated between 2009 and 2011 at the University Hospital Complex of Pontevedra (%).

Year  S. aureus (no. isolates)  Total MRSA  Only (OX)-R MRSA  p-values  (OX-LEV)-R MRSA  p-values 
2009  821  229 (27.9)  13 (5.7)    34 (14.9)   
2010  864  241 (27.9)  16 (6.6)  0.361  47 (19.5)  0.011 
2011  902  258 (28.6)  20 (7.8)    62 (24)   

Abbreviations: LEV, levofloxacin; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; OX, oxacillin; R, resistant.

Ten pulsotypes (A–J) were identified (Fig. 1). The following subtypes were identified: four in pulsotype A, three in pulsotype E, and two in pulsotype G (Fig. 1). The spa and ST identified in the OX-R and OX-R-LEV-R phenotypes are shown in Table 2. All isolates carried a SCCmecIVc, except ST398 that harboured SCCmecV.

Fig. 1.

MRSA clonal types identified in the study.

*ST30 clone showed the same PFGE profile (PFGE-J) in (OX)-R and (OX-LEV)-R phenotypes. Abbreviations: LEV, levofloxacin; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; OX, oxacillin; PFGE, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; R, resistant; ST, sequence type.

Table 2.

Yearly variation of clonal types, SARM (OX)-R and (OX-LEV)-R (%).

MLST/spa  200920102011TOTAL
  (OX)-R  (OX-LEV)-R  (OX)-R  (OX-LEV)-R  (OX)-R  (OX-LEV)-R  (OX)-R  (OX-LEV)-R 
ST5/t002,a t688b  7 (53.8)  30 (88.2)  2 (12.5)  36 (76.7)  4 (20)  28 (45.2)  13 (26.5)  94 (65.7) 
ST72/t148      6 (37.5)  7 (14.9)  7 (35)  15 (24.2)  13 (26.5)  22 (15.4) 
ST125/t067    3 (8.8)    2 (4.2)    13 (20.9)    18 (12.6) 
ST22/t431        2 (4.2)    6 (9.7)    8 (5.6) 
ST30/t1133  1 (7.7)  1 (3)  3 (18.8)    1 (5)    5 (10.2)  1 (0.7) 
ST8/t008  5 (38.5)    5 (31.2)    6 (30)    16 (32.6)   
ST398/t011          2 (10)    2 (4.1)   
Total  13  34  16  47  20  62  49  143 

t002 (n=106).


t688 [n=1, (OX-LEV)-R].

The yearly increase in the OX-R-LEV-R phenotype is shown in Table 2. The prevalence of ST5 decreased throughout the three years, from 88.2% in 2009 to 45.2% in 2011. Nevertheless, ST72 increased its prevalence from zero isolates in 2009 to 24.2% in 2011. In addition, ST125 increased its prevalence from 8.8% in 2009 to 20.9% in 2011.

Characteristics of the population studied

The 192 MRSA isolates corresponded to 192 patients. The median age of the patients was 77 years (range 10 days–94 years), and 50.0% were men. The most common underlying diseases associated with isolation of MRSA were cardiovascular diseases (54.2%), followed by diabetes mellitus (35.8%) and cancer (14.7%); two or more concurrent underlying diseases were identified in 30.3% of patients. In 28.4% of patients there was no detectable underlying disease. The source of the isolates was skin and soft tissue infection in 71.7% of cases, followed by bacteraemia (6.6%). Factors related to MRSA infection included hospitalisation in the 12 months prior to the isolation of the microorganism (42.1%) and a previous history of MRSA infection (19.2%).

Fluoroquinolone mutations and clonal hypermutants identified in OX-R and OX-R-LEV-R MRSA

All the OX-R-LEV-R strains showed a levofloxacin MIC of >32mg/l and the mutations S84L, in gyrA, and S80F in grlA. In addition to mutation S84L, the isolates belonging to clone ST22 carried the mutation S85P in gyrA. Mutation frequency experiments revealed a higher frequency of mutations (10−5–10−6) for clonal types ST5, ST30, ST72, and ST125 compared with clonal types ST8, ST22 and ST398 (10−8–10−7). No statistically differences in mutation rates were detected when comparing the OX-R strains, or the OX-R-LEV-R strains. The mutation rate when comparing clones was statistically significant in the OX-R and OX-R-LEV-R phenotypes (p<0.05) both for streptomycin and rifampicin. Analysing the mutation rate of the different pairs of clones (Table 3), the differences were statistically significant for all clones except ST8 vs ST30, ST8 vs ST398, and ST30 vs ST398 in the OX-R phenotype both for streptomycin and rifampicin. The mutation rate for streptomycin of the OX-R-LEV-R phenotype was statistically significant in all pair of clones except ST30 vs ST22 and ST72 vs ST125 (Table 3). The mutation rate for rifampicin of the OX-R-LEV-R phenotype was statistically significant in all pair of clones except ST5 vs ST125, ST72 vs ST125, and ST30 vs ST22 (Table 3).

Table 3.

Multiple comparison in the mutation rate for SARM (OX)-R and (OX-LEV)-R phenotypes.

ST vs ST  StreptomycinRifampicin
  CI 95%  p value  CI 95%  p value  CI 95%  p value  CI 95%  p value 
ST5 ST8  3.07×10−5, 3.46×10−5  <0.001  NA    8.72×10−6, 1.19×10−5  <0.001  NA   
ST22  NA    3.10×10−5, 3.45×10−5  <0.001  NA    3.00×10−5, 3.55×10−5  <0.001 
ST30  2.97×10−5, 3.36×10−5  <0.001  3.01×10−5–3.36×10−5  <0.001  7.61×10−6, 1.08×10−5  <0.001  2.87×10−5, 3.43×10−5  <0.001 
ST125  NA    2.10×10−5, 2.45×10−5  <0.001  NA    −2.55×10−6, 3.02×10−6  0.999 
ST398  3.14×10−5, 3.52×10−5  <0.001  NA    9.28×10−6, 1.25×10−5  <0.001  NA   
ST8 ST30  −2.97×10−6, 8.98×10−7  0.441  NA    −2.72×106, 5.11×10−7  0.238  NA   
ST72  −6.63×10−5, −6.24×10−5  <0.001  NA    −3.52×10−5, −3.2×10−5  <0.001  NA   
ST398  −1.31×10−6, ×2.56×10−6  0.821  NA    −1.05×10−6, 2.18×10−6  0.777  NA   
ST125 ST30  NA    7.39×10−5, 1.09×10−5  <0.001  NA    2.85×10−5, 3.41×10−5  <0.001 
ST72 ST125  NA    −1.12×10−6, 2.38×10−5  0.758  NA    −2.52×10−6, 3.05×10−6  0.997 
ST22  NA    8.89×10−5, 1.24×10−5  <0.001  NA    3.00×10−5, 3.56×10−5  <0.001 
ST5  2.96×10−5, 3.35×10−5  <0.001  2.03×10−5, 2.38×10−5  <0.001  2.17×10−5, 2.49×10−5  <0.001  −2.75×10−6, 2.82×10−6  <0.001 
ST30  6.13×10−5, 6.52×10−5  <0.001  8.03×10−6, 1.15×10−5  <0.001  3.09×10−5, 3.42×10−5  <0.001  2.88×10−5, 3.43×10−5  <0.001 
ST398  6.3×10−5, 6.69×10−5  <0.001  NA    3.26×10−5, 3.58×10−5  <0.001  NA   
ST30 ST22  NA    −8.95×10−7, 2.61×10−6  0.523  NA    −1.55×10−6, 4.01×10−6  0.610 
ST398  −2.71×10−7, 3.6×10−6  0.102  NA    5.35×10−8, 3.28×10−6  0.042  NA   

NA: not applicable.

Identification of MSCRAMMs in the different clones

Except for ST30, any single clonal type possessed certain specific MSCRAMMs independently of the resistance phenotype. The following MSCRAMMs were detected: ST72-(clfA-clfB-fnbA-fnbB-sdrC-efb), ST30-OX-R-(clfA-clfB-fnbA-cna-sdrC-ebpS), ST30-OX-R-LEV-R-(clfA-clfB-fnbA-sdrC-ebpS), ST5-(clfA-clfB-fnbA-fnbB-ebpS), ST8-(clfA-clfB-fnbA-sdrC-efb), ST22-(clfA-clfB-fnbA-cna), ST125-(clfA-clfB-fnbA-ebpS), ST398-(clfA-fnbA).


MRSA infections are more common in older individuals with comorbidities.17 In our study, CA-MRSA was the cause of 31.3% of the infections. This figure is higher than that previously reported in several nationwide studies in Spain18 and in Europe.19 However, the rates in the United States are much higher, above 50%.20

The increase in the prevalence of resistance to fluoroquinolones has been associated with different factors21 including the persistent increase in quinolone prescriptions, as is the case of Spain.22 The main mechanism of resistance to fluoroquinolones is through mutations in the genes coding for topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase, and the degree of resistance is proportional to the number of mutations accumulated.23

The international epidemic clone ST5 was the most successful in our study (Table 2). Over the first decade of this century, this clone has persisted in our healthcare setting carrying SCCmecII.24 It currently carries SCCmecIVc, and is at present the main clone isolated.9,25 The smaller size of SCCmecIVc may be an evolutionary advantage, making its spread more effective.26 The fact that this clone circulated for a longer period in our setting,24 and its hypermutable status may facilitate its selection as the predominant clone of the fluoroquinolone-resistant phenotype.

ST72 is also a hypermutable clone that emerged recently in our setting, and a significant increase in its prevalence has been reported.25 Although this clone is uncommon in Europe, we must remain alert to its probable spread; in South Korea it is the primary cause of community-acquired MRSA infection, and it is also the main MRSA isolated from the meat of animals for consumption.27 Its high number of MSCRAMMs may be related to its elevated capacity to colonise both humans and animals.

The close clonal relationship between most of the OX-R and OX-R-LEV-R strains in ST5, ST72, and ST30 clones suggests that quinolone resistance evolved from the OX-R population. Whereas ST30 is infrequent in our study, ST5 and ST72 were the two most common clones isolated. Interestingly, these were the only clones in which fnbB-fnbA were detected simultaneously. These two genes code for adhesins important in the adhesion and internalisation of S. aureus into mammalian epithelial cells and in the initiation of the biofilm.3 This may have contributed to their epidemiological expansion.

The pandemic clone ST30 is highly prevalent in the Southwest Pacific, but is infrequent in Spain,18 representing only 3.1% of the isolates in our study.

The international epidemic clones ST22 and ST125 have been isolated frequently in Spain, mainly clone ST125.9,28 In our study, only strains belonging to the OX-R-LEV-R phenotype were detected belonging to these clones. Since no OX-R isolates were detected, we can speculate that these two clones were introduced in the MRSA population as OX-R-LEV-R and not evolved from a previous OX-R local population.

The ST8 clone has been selected as the major clonal type in the OX-R phenotype (32.6%). However, we did not identify ST8 OX-R-LEV-R strains in the present study, a finding that could be related to the fact that it is not a hypermutable clone.

The ST398 clone had the smallest number of MSCRAMMs and lacked the two adhesins (clfB-sdrC) with affinity for epithelial cells. This fact could limit its ability to colonise the nares in humans as ST398 is a clone typically associated with livestock.29

The ST5 and ST72 clones were the most frequently identified in the OX-R-LEV-R population. Both clones showed a hypermutable phenotype that favours their selection as the fluoroquinolone resistant clones. The genetic relationships identified between OX-R and OX-R-LEV-R clones that belong to the same ST indicate that OX-R MRSA clones have evolved from a pre-existing OX-R MRSA population. The richest MSCRAMMs environment in the most frequent clones could have played a role in their fitness to colonise the host.


This work was partially financed by Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias PI070812 and Consejería de Sanidad de la Junta de Galicia PS08/34.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


We would like to thank Dr. Marta García Campello, Head of the Microbiology and Parasitology Laboratories Department of the University Hospital Complex of Pontevedra, for allowing us access to the strains under study. We would also like to thank Dr. José Pintado Valverde of Marinas de Vigo Research Institute (CSIC) for his collaboration in the running of the GelCompar II software. We would also like to thank Dr. Ángel Salgado Barreira for the statistical analysis.

M.Z. David, R.S. Daum.
Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic.
Clin Microbiol Rev, 23 (2010), pp. 616-687
F. Lowy.
Antimicrobial resistances: the example of Staphylococcus aureus.
J Clin Invest, 111 (2003), pp. 1265-1273
T.J. Foster, J.A. Geoghegan, V.K. Ganesh, M. Höök.
Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus.
Nat Rev Microbiol, 12 (2014), pp. 49-62
M.A. Morrison, J.C. Hageman, R.M. Klevens.
Case definition for community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J Hosp Infect, 62 (2006), pp. 241
S.K. Fridkin, J.C. Hageman, M. Morrison, L.T. Sanza, K. Como-Sabetti, J.A. Jernigan, et al.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities.
N Engl J Med, 352 (2005), pp. 1436-1444
European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, Version 2.0; valid from 2012-01-01.
Y. Kondo, T. Ito, X.X. Ma, S. Watanabe, B.N. Kreiswirth, J. Etienne, et al.
Combination of multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type assignment: rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in junkyard regions.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 51 (2007), pp. 264-274
S. Murchan, M.E. Kaufmann, A. Deplano, R. de Ryck, M. Struelens, C.E. Zinn, et al.
Harmonization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for epidemiological typing of strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a single approach developed by consensus in 10 European laboratories and its application for tracing the spread.
J Clin Microbiol, 41 (2003), pp. 1574-1585
M. González-Domínguez, C. Seral, C. Potel, L. Constenla, S. Algarate, M.J. Gude, et al.
Antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors and genetic lineages of hospital-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates detected in a hospital in Zaragoza.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 33 (2015), pp. 590-596
D. Harmsen, H. Claus, W. Witte, J. Rothgänger, H. Claus, D. Turnwald, et al.
Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management.
J Clin Microbiol, 41 (2003), pp. 5442-5448
M.C. Enright, N.P.J. Day, C.E. Davies, S.J. Peacock, B.G. Spratt.
Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus.
J Clin Microbiol, 38 (2000), pp. 1008-1015
H.N. Trong, A-L. Prunier, R. Leclercq.
Hypermutable and fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 2098-2101
F. Schmitz, M.E. Jones, B. Hofmann, B. Hansen, S. Scheuring, M. Lückefahr, et al.
Characterization of grlA, grlB, gyrA, and gyrB mutations in 116 unrelated isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and effects of mutations on ciprofloxacin MIC.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 42 (1998), pp. 1249-1252
S.J. Peacock, C.E. Moore, A. Justice, M. Kantzanou, L. Story, K. Mackie, et al.
Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus.
Infect Immun, 70 (2002), pp. 4987-4996
M. Li, B.A. Diep, A.E. Villaruz, K.R. Braughton, X. Jiang, F.R. DeLeo, et al.
Evolution of virulence in epidemic community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106 (2009), pp. 5883-5888
A.R. Gomes, S. Vinga, M. Zavolan, H.de. Lencastre.
Analysis of the genetic variability of virulence-related loci in epidemic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 366-379
H.W. Boucher, G.R. Corey.
Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Clin Infect Dis, 46 (2008), pp. 344-349
A. Vindel, P. Trincado, O. Cuevas, C. Ballesteros, E. Bouza, E. Cercenado.
Molecular epidemiology of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Spain: 2004–12.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 69 (2014), pp. 2913-2919
H. Grundmann, D.M. Aanensen, C.C. Van Den Wijngaard, B.G. Spratt, D. Harmsen, A.W. Friedrich, et al.
Geographic distribution of Staphylococcus aureus causing invasive infections in Europe: a molecular-epidemiological analysis.
PLoS Med, 7 (2010), pp. 1-15
R.J. Moellering.
The growing menace of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Ann Intern Med, 144 (2006), pp. 368-370
D.C. Hooper.
New uses for new and old quinolones and the challenge of resistance.
Clin Infect Dis, 30 (2000), pp. 243-254
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.
Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe 2012.
ECDC, (2014),
H. Iihara, T. Suzuki, Y. Kawamura, K. Ohkusu, Y. Inoue, W. Zhang, et al.
Emerging multiple mutations and high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from ocular infections.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 56 (2006), pp. 297-303
C. Potel, M. Álvarez, P. Álvarez, I. Otero, E. Fluiters.
Evolution, antimicrobial susceptibility and assignment to international clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated over a 9-year period in two Spanish hospitals.
Clin Microbiol Infect, 13 (2007), pp. 728-730
C. Potel, S. Rey, S. Otero, J. Rubio, M. Álvarez.
Molecular characterization and clonal diversity of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the community in Spain: emergence of clone sequence type 72.
J Hosp Infect, 93 (2016), pp. 382-385
N. Zetola, J.S. Francis, E.L. Nuermberger, W.R. Bishai.
Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging threat.
Lancet Infect Dis, 14 (2008), pp. 377-380
K.S. Ko, S.K. Lim, S.C. Jung, J.M. Yoon, J.Y. Choi, J.H. Song.
Sequence type 72 meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from humans, raw meat and soil in South Korea.
J Med Microbiol, 60 (2011), pp. 442-445
A. Vindel, O. Cuevas, E. Cercenado, C. Marcos, V. Bautista, C. Castellares, et al.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Spain: molecular epidemiology and utility of different typing methods.
J Clin Microbiol, 47 (2009), pp. 1620-1627
A-C. Uhlemann, S.F. Porcella, S. Trivedi, S.B. Sullivan, C. Hafer, A.D. Kennedy, et al.
Identification of a highly transmissible animal-independent Staphylococcus aureus ST398 clone with distinct genomic and cell adhesion properties.
MBio, 3 (2012), pp. 1-9
Copyright © 2017. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos