Buscar en
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology
Toda la web
Inicio Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology Anaesthetic management for emergent upper limb trauma surgery in a 23-week pregn...
Información de la revista
Vol. 42. Núm. 3.
Páginas 234-237 (Julio - Septiembre 2014)
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 42. Núm. 3.
Páginas 234-237 (Julio - Septiembre 2014)
Case report
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcae.2014.04.010
Acceso a texto completo
Anaesthetic management for emergent upper limb trauma surgery in a 23-week pregnant woman: Role of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Case report
Manejo anestésico para la cirugía urgente traumatológica en miembro superior en una gestante de 23 semanas: rol del bloqueo ecoguiado del plexo braquial mediante abordaje infraclavicular. Reporte de caso
Rosana Guerrero-Domíngueza,
Autor para correspondencia

Corresponding author at: Avda Ramón Carande, No11, 4oE, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.
, Daniel López-Herrera-Rodrígueza, Jesús Fernández-Lópezb, Ángeles Luengoa, Ignacio Jiménezc
a MD, Anaesthetist, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
b Anaesthesia Resident, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
c PhD, Anaesthetist, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Descargar PDF
Figuras (2)

We describe the anaesthetic management of a 34-year-old woman at 23 weeks of gestation with a forearm tendon and vascular injury who required an emergent surgical repair. Brachial plexus nerve block avoids the potential risk of failed intubation and aspiration in addition to reducing the exposure of the foetus to potentially teratogenic drugs. Whenever feasible, a regional anaesthetic technique should be used. If general anaesthesia is mandatory, a rapid sequence induction is required. A multidisciplinary approach needs to be established early in the management of these patients. Anaesthetists must provide safe anaesthesia for both mother and child by maintaining adequate maternal oxygenation for avoiding foetal asphyxia.

Pregnant women
Anesthesia, conduction
Brachial plexus
Nerve block

Describimos el manejo anestésico de una mujer de 34 años en su 23 semana de gestación con una lesión vascular y tendinosa de antebrazo que requirió una reparación quirúrgica urgente. El bloqueo nervioso del plexo braquial evita el riesgo potencial de intubación fallida y de broncoaspiración, además de reducir la exposición fetal a fármacos potencialmente teratógenos. Mientras sea posible una técnica anestésica regional, debería ser usada. Si es inevitable una anestesia general, se requiere una inducción de secuencia rápida. Un abordaje multidisciplinar debe ser establecido en el manejo de estas pacientes. Los anestesiólogos deben proporcionar una anestesia segura tanto para la madre como para el feto manteniendo una oxigenación materna adecuada para evitar la asfixia fetal.

Palabras clave:
Mujeres embarazadas
Anestesia de conducción
Plexo braquial
Bloqueo nervioso
Texto completo

Anaesthetic techniques used in obstetric patients requiring emergent surgical interventions pose a challenge to the anaesthetist. In the second trimester, the teratogenic effects of certain drugs used in our daily practice1,2 may compromise foetal development and lead to the occurrence of different types of malformations depending on gestational age. Locoregional procedures are the options of choice in these patients.3

Clinical case

We present the case of a 34-year-old pregnant woman at 23 weeks of gestation who was involved in an automobile accident and sustained blunt and penetrating trauma to the left forearm with subsidiary tendon and vascular injuries, requiring urgent intervention. She had no other remarkable personal history except for uncertainty regarding the fasting period. After the assessment by a multidisciplinary team consisting of orthopaedic surgeons, anaesthetists and a gynaecologist, it was decided to take the patient to emergent surgery using ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block.

Since arrival to our centre, the patient remained haemodynamically stable. Airway exploration revealed a Mallampati II airway, normal cervical extension, and unrestricted mouth opening. The patient reported severe pain and functional impairment of the forearm, together with active bleeding at the wound site. Whole blood count showed normal results for red blood cells, leukocytes, platelets and coagulation tests. The gynaecological ultrasound showed a normally developing pregnancy for the reported gestational age.

In the operating room, considering the gestational age of more than 20 weeks, the patient was placed in left lateral decubitus in order to reduce aortocaval compression and improve venous return. Prophylactic amoxicillin was given 30min before the start of the surgical intervention. After usual non-invasive monitoring of blood pressure, electrocardiogram and pulse oximetry, the patient received fentanyl 100μg for anxiety control. Nasal prongs were used at a flow rate of 2l/min. Given the gestational age, the obstetric team decided not to use intraoperative foetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring.

The patient was then placed in supine decubitus with the arm in adduction in order to use a coracoid approach technique. The axillary artery was localized under ultrasound guidance and the pectoralis major, pectoralis minor, lateral, posterior and medial brachial plexus fascicles were identified around the artery. With the probe in a vertical position, the in-plane approach was used to deliver 20ml of 1.5% mepivacaine distributed between the three brachial plexus fascicles; the ultrasound showed an anechoic image of the local anaesthetic injection (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Ultrasound image of the brachial plexus at the infraclavicular level showing the distribution of the local anaesthetic to the lateral, posterior and medial fascicles.

Source: Authors.

During the procedure consisting of tendon repair and vascular anastomosis (Fig. 2), the patient remained haemodynamically stable, with systolic blood pressures between 110 and 120mmHg, heart rate of 80–90 beats per minute and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 99–100%. Analgesia and motor block were adequate throughout, with no need for adjuvant analgesia or sedation. After 140min of the surgical intervention and completion of the procedure, the patient was transferred to the recovery room where she evolved favourably.

Fig. 2.

Intraoperative image of the surgical repair of the vascular and tendinous injuries in the anterior aspect of the forearm.

Source: Authors.

Non-obstetrical surgery during pregnancy is relatively common, with an incidence of 0.15% of the pregnant patients.4–6 The most frequent indications for surgery during pregnancy are acute abdominal infections (such as appendicitis or cholecystitis), trauma and tumours.4,7 However, any type of emergent surgical procedure may be required during pregnancy.4

Performing a surgical intervention in obstetric patients has important anaesthetic implications8 related primarily to physiological changes, the potential teratogenic effect of the drugs used, and haemodynamic alterations associated with anaesthesia induction or maintenance which might compromise foetal wellbeing.1,2 Anatomic and physiological changes9 as a result of oedema, and friable upper airway tissues, may hamper ventilation and orotracheal intubation.3 Moreover, the pregnant uterus is the most important consideration for “full stomach” after 20 weeks of gestation.1,2

Anxiolytic premedication is essential,2 considering that increased adrenergic activity in the context of a stressful situation, as well as the associated hyperventilation, may result in uterine arterial vasoconstriction and reduced utero-placental blood flow because of the chronic physiologic respiratory alkalosis.1,2,5

The use of locoregional techniques avoids the potential risk of failed intubation and aspiration, and also limits foetal exposure to potentially teratogenic drugs.2,10,11 In those cases where the use of general anaesthesia is unavoidable, rapid sequence induction is recommended1,2,4; the strategy for approaching the airway must be planned together with a back-up plan in the event the initial approach fails. As for intraoperative FHR monitoring, its usefulness is controversial before 25 weeks of gestation2,4,12–14 because in the context of general anaesthesia15 there could be variability changes due to the non-pathological effect of the anaesthetic drugs on the foetal autonomic nervous system.2 Although FHR monitoring after 25 weeks is an important indicator of adequate utero-placental perfusion,4 some authors consider that, before that gestational age, it may give rise to confusion regarding the detection of compromised foetal wellbeing.2

Anaesthetic management of patients with upper limb trauma may be accomplished by means of brachial plexus blocks through the inter-scalene, axillary, supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches.16 Ultrasound-guided locoregional blocks17 have grown in popularity18 because they allow direct visualization of the nerve structures, the needle, and the adjacent structures, but most importantly, controlled distribution of the local anaesthetic.18 The infraclavicular brachial plexus block has been shown to be effective for elbow, forearm and hand surgery.19 The advantages of this approach include the ability to perform the block with the patient's arm in any position, the fact that it points away from the neurovascular structures of the neck, and the ability to fix a continuous brachial plexus catheter to the chest wall18,20,21. Ultrasound visualization of the anatomic structures improves our success with the infraclavicular brachial plexus block, as it helps to reduce complications such as intraneural injection of local anaesthetics and the risk of pneumothorax.18,22

Our main objective during the surgical intervention is to maintain maternal haemodynamic stability,1,2,4,23 ensuring adequate utero-placental perfusion and foetal oxygenation in order to avoid periods of hypotension. We recommend the use of locoregional anaesthetic techniques in order to avoid the use of potentially teratogenic drugs4,9 and airway manipulation, given the potentially difficult airway and the increased risk of aspiration.1,2,4



Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

R. Ní Mhuireachtaigh, D.A. O’Gorman.
Anesthesia in pregnant patients for nonobstetric surgery.
J Clin Anesth, 18 (2006), pp. 60-66
E. Reitman, P. Flood.
Anaesthetic considerations for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy.
Br J Anaesth, 107 (2011), pp. i72-i78
T. Bansal, P. Kumar, S. Hooda.
Anestesia regional: todavía una alternativa adecuada en la parturienta con obesidad mórbida.
Rev Colomb Anestesiol, 41 (2013), pp. 302-305
M. Van de Velde, F. De Buck.
Anesthesia for non-obstetric surgery in the pregnant patient.
Minerva Anestesiol, 73 (2007), pp. 235-240
J.B. Brodsky, E.N. Cohen, B.W. Brown Jr., M.L. Wu, C. Witcher.
Surgery during pregnancy and fetal outcome.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 138 (1980), pp. 165-167
B. Kort, V.L. Katz, W.J. Watson.
The effect of nonobstetric operation during pregnancy.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 177 (1993), pp. 371-376
N.N. Naughton, S.E. Cohen.
Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy.
Obstetric anesthesia: principlesand practice, 3rd ed., pp. 255-272
J.A. Crowhurst.
Anaesthesia for non obstetric surgery during pregnancy.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg, 53 (2002), pp. 295-297
S.E. Cohen.
Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy.
2nd ed., pp. 279
H.G. Kress.
Effects of general anaesthetics on second messenger systems.
Eur J Anaesthesiol, 12 (1995), pp. 83-97
J.E. Sturrock, J.F. Nunn.
Mitosis in mammalian cells during exposure to anesthetics.
Anesthesiology, 43 (1975), pp. 21-33
L.P. Wang, M.J. Paech.
Neuroanesthesia for the pregnant woman.
Anesth Analg, 107 (2008), pp. 193-200
K.M. Kuczkowski.
Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy: what are the risks of anesthesia?.
Obstet Gynecol Surv, 59 (2004), pp. 52-56
T.J. Horrigan, R. Villareal, L. Weinstein.
Are obstetrical personnel required for intraoperative fetal monitoring during nonobstetric surgery?.
J Perinatol, 19 (1999), pp. 124-126
ACOG, ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice.
Nonobstetric surgery in pregnancy.
Obstet Gynecol, 102 (2003), pp. 431
J.C. Dardon, L. Herrera, A. Perez.
Estudio comparativo, prospectivo, longitudinal y aleatorio de tres técnicas de bloqueos cervicobraquiales para cirugía de extremidades superiores.
Rev Mex Anest, 23 (2000), pp. 7-10
M.I. Vásques, A.M. Jiménez, O.D. Aguirre, M.P. González, A.M. Ríos.
Bloqueo supraclavicular bilateral con ecografía.
Rev Colomb Anestesiol, 40 (2012), pp. 304-308
A. Ortega Romero, D. de Diego Isasa, C. del Olmo Rodríguez, E. Maroto Ramos, R. Rouco Gil.
Ecografía portátil en anestesia regional: bloqueos del plexo braquial.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 55 (2008), pp. 294-303
J.L. Wilson, D.L. Brown, G.Y. Wong, R.L. Ehman, D.R. Cahill.
Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: parasagittal anatomy important to the coracoid technique.
Anesth Analg, 87 (1998), pp. 870-873
A. Perlas, V.W. Chan, M. Simons.
Brachial plexus examination and localization using and electrical stimulation.
Anesthesiology, 99 (2003), pp. 429-435
P. Marhofer, M. Greher, S. Kapral.
Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia.
Br J Anaesth, 94 (2005), pp. 7-17
P. Bigeleisen.
Nerve puncture and apparent intraneural injection during ultrasound–guided axillary block does not invariably result in neurologic injury.
Anesthesiology, 105 (2006), pp. 779-783
N.N. Naughton, C.S. Chitra.
Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy.
Obstetric anesthesia: principles practice, pp. 255-272

Please cite this article as: Guerrero-Domínguez R, López-Herrera-Rodríguez D, Fernández-López J, Luengo Á, Jiménez I. Manejo anestésico para la cirugía urgente traumatológica en miembro superior en una gestante de 23 semanas: rol del bloqueo ecoguiado del plexo braquial mediante abordaje infraclavicular: reporte de caso. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2014;42:234–237.

Copyright © 2013. Sociedad Colombiana de Anestesiología y Reanimación
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

es en pt
Política de cookies Cookies policy Política de cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.