metricas
covid
Annals of Hepatology PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF RESPONSE TO URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID TREATMENT IN MEXICAN PATI...
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue S2.
Abstracts of the 2025 Annual Meeting of the ALEH
(September 2025)
Vol. 30. Issue S2.
Abstracts of the 2025 Annual Meeting of the ALEH
(September 2025)
#107
Full text access
PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF RESPONSE TO URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID TREATMENT IN MEXICAN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS
Visits
161
Fátima Higuera de la Tijera1, Graciela Elia Castro Narro2, Ana Cano Contreras3, José Luis Pérez Hernández1, Jorge Emilio Lira Vera4, José Antonio Velarde Ruiz Velasco5
1 Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga".
2 Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México.
3 Instituto de Investigaciones Médico Biológicas de la Universidad Veracruzana, México.
4 Hospital Ángeles. San Luis Potosí, México.
5 Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde.Guadalajara. México
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (2)
Tables
Tables
Show moreShow less
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 30. Issue S2

Abstracts of the 2025 Annual Meeting of the ALEH

More info
Introduction and Objectives

Non-responders (NR) to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) are at risk of disease progression. The aim was to identify risk factors associated with treatment response (improvement or failure) to UDCA in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

Materials and Methods

A case-control study nested within a cohort. Treatment response with UDCA was evaluated with the Barcelona criteria. We compared variables between responders (R) and NR. To evaluate risk factors we performed uni and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A P-value < 0.01 was considered significant.

Results

329 patients with PBC from 5 tertiary-care centers in Mexico, 95.4% women, mean age 52.5±10.9 years. All received UDCA (13-15 mg/kg/day) and reported treatment adherence; 159 (48.3%) NR. In a sample of 119 patients with complete data for analysis, 98.3% women, mean age 49.9±11.4 years, 49 (41.2%) NR. Univariate analysis: albumin 3.5 range=2.0-4.8 vs. 4.0 range=2.6-4.8 mg/dL; and platelet count 118 range=52-518 vs. 200 78-436 cell/109/L were lower in NR (P<0.0001). Bilirubin 1.9 range=1.0-6.4 vs. 1.6 range=1.0-3.0 mg/dL (P<0.0001), and alkaline phosphatase 666 range=143-1445 vs. 480 range=170-1556 IU/L (P=0.01) were higher in NR. NR had a higher proportion of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis 83.7% vs. 25.7%; P<0.0001; OR=14.8, 95%CI=5.8-37.4; obesity 81.6% vs.31.4%; P<0.0001; OR=9.7, 95%CI=4.0-23.4; autoimmune hepatitis overlap (AIHo) 42.9% vs. 7.1%; P<0.0001; OR=9.8, 95%CI=3.3-28.5; and longer disease course: 5-10 years 44.9% vs. 38.6%; P=0.004; OR=4.3, 95%CI=1.6-11.5; and >10 years 40.8% vs. 8.6%; P<0.0001; OR=17.6, 95%CI=5.2-59.6. The statins add-on enhanced the response to UDCA 60% vs. 16.3%; P<0.0001; OR=0.1, 95%CI=0.05-0.3. Fibrates use, age, AST, ALT, GGT, cholesterol, and INR were not different between groups. The results obtained in the multivariate analysis are shown in Table 1.

Conclusions

Statins improved response to UDCA. AIHo, advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, bilirubin >2.0 mg/dL, and obesity were factors related to NR.

Full Text

Conflict of interest: None

Comparison of Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics Between Responders and Non-Responders to UDCA Treatment in Patients with PBC According to Barcelona Criteria: Univariate Analysis

Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics  Responders (n = 70)  Non-Responders (n = 49)  P-value  OR (95% CI) 
Age, years  50.5 ± 11.8  48.9 ± 10.9  0.46  NA 
Alkaline phosphatase, U/L  480 (170–1556)  666 (143–1445)  0.01  NA 
Platelets, x 10?/L  200 (78–436)  118 (52–518)  < 0.0001  NA 
Total bilirubin, mg/dL  1.6 (1.0–3.0)  1.9 (1.0–6.4)  < 0.0001  NA 
ALT, U/L  75 (21–185)  102 (19–456)  0.07  NA 
AST, U/L  77 (23–204)  98 (18–333)  0.12  NA 
GGT, U/L  354 (86–1349)  444 (99–1238)  0.05  NA 
Cholesterol, mg/dL  215 (85–779)  198 (85–409)  0.29  NA 
Albumin, g/dL  4.0 (2.6–4.8)  3.5 (2.0–4.8)  < 0.0001  NA 
INR  1.0 (0.7–1.5)  1.0 (0.8–1.5)  0.50  NA 
Fibrosis F3 or F4, n (%)  18 (25.7%)  41 (83.7%)  < 0.0001  14.8 (5.8–37.4) 
Obesity, n (%)  22 (31.4%)  40 (81.6%)  < 0.0001  9.7 (4.0–23.4) 
AIH overlap, n (%)  5 (7.1%)  21 (42.9%)  < 0.0001  9.8 (3.3–28.5) 
Dyslipidemia, n (%)  44 (62.9%)  11 (22.4%)  < 0.0001  0.2 (0.08–0.4) 
Statin use, n (%)  42 (60%)  8 (16.3%)  < 0.0001  0.1 (0.05–0.3) 
Fibrate use, n (%)  33 (47.1%)  23 (46.9%)  0.98  1.0 (0.5–2.1) 
PBC duration < 5 years  37 (52.8%)  7 (14.3%)  Ref  Ref 
PBC duration 5 to 10 years  27 (38.6%)  22 (44.9%)  0.004  4.3 (1.6–11.5) 
PBC duration > 10 years  6 (8.6%)  20 (40.8%)  < 0.0001  17.6 (5.2–59.6) 
Total bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dL, n (%)  13 (18.6%)  24 (48.9%)  < 0.0001  4.2 (1.8–9.6) 

Multivariate Analysis of Factors Associated with Response or Failure to UDCA Treatment in PBC Patients (Barcelona Criteria)

Variable  OR (95% CI)  P-value 
Total bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dL  4.4 (1.1 – 17.0)  0.03 
Fibrosis F3 or F4  7.1 (1.9 – 26.6)  0.004 
Obesity  4.9 (1.4 – 17.9)  0.015 
AIH overlap  20.8 (3.1 – 137.6)  0.002 
Statin use *  0.08 (0.02 – 0.4)  0.002 
PBC duration 5 to 10 years  1.2 (0.3 – 5.4)  0.78 
PBC duration > 10 years  6.1 (1.0 – 38.3)  0.05 

Abbreviations: AIH = Autoimmune Hepatitis; CI = Confidence Interval; F3 = Advanced Fibrosis; F4 = Cirrhosis; OR = Odds Ratio; PBC = Primary Biliary Cholangitis; UDCA = Ursodeoxycholic Acid.

* = Protective factor.

Multivariate analysis: Binary logistic regression.

Download PDF
Article options
Tools