metricas
covid
Annals of Hepatology LONGITUDINAL CHANGES IN STEATOTIC LIVER DISEASE SUBTYPE CLASSIFICATION AND SUBSE...
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue S2.
Abstracts of the 2025 Annual Meeting of the ALEH
(September 2025)
Vol. 30. Issue S2.
Abstracts of the 2025 Annual Meeting of the ALEH
(September 2025)
#50
Full text access
LONGITUDINAL CHANGES IN STEATOTIC LIVER DISEASE SUBTYPE CLASSIFICATION AND SUBSEQUENT RISK OF MAJOR ADVERSE LIVER OUTCOMES
Visits
99
Pedro Raul Ochoa Allemant1, Douglas Schaubel1, David Kaplan1, Marina Serper1
1 University of Pennsylvania, USA.
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 30. Issue S2

Abstracts of the 2025 Annual Meeting of the ALEH

More info
Introduction and Objectives

Steatotic liver disease (SLD) includes metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), and their intersection (MetALD). SLD subtype classification may change over time; however, the impact of these transitions on major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) is unknown.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of adults with imaging-confirmed steatosis (n=270,302) in the Veterans Health Administration (2010-2021). The primary exposure was change in SLD subtype classification between cohort entry (steatosis on imaging) and a 2-year landmark. The primary outcome was incident MALO (cirrhosis, decompensation, HCC, transplant, liver-related death). We calculated incidence rates per 100 person-years and multivariable cause-specific Cox regression models to examine the magnitud of the association between changes in SLD subtype and subsequent MALO.

Results

At the 2-year landmark, 8.2% of those with baseline MASLD were reclassified to MetALD or ALD, 34.2% of those with baseline MetALD were reclassified to MASLD or ALD, and 64.0% of those with baseline ALD were reclassified to MASLD or MetALD. Among baseline MASLD, the risk of MALO was higher for those reclassified to MetALD (HR 1.55;95% CI 1.40-1.71) or ALD (HR 2.13;95% CI 1.66-2.74) compared with those who remained MASLD. Among baseline MetALD, the risk of MALO was lower for those reclassified to MASLD (HR 0.55;95% CI 0.48-0.64) and higher for those reclassified to ALD (HR 1.80;95% CI 1.58-2.06) compared with those who remained MetALD. Among baseline ALD, the risk of MALO was lower for those reclassified to MASLD (HR 0.31;95% CI 0.21-0.46) or MetALD (HR 0.82;95% CI 0.70-0.96) compared with those who remained ALD.

Conclusions

Changes in SLD subtype classification are associated with distinct MALO risks.

Full Text

Conflict of interest: Yes, NIHT32 DK007740

Association of changes in steatotic liver disease subtype classification with major adverse liver outcomes

Download PDF
Article options
Tools