Buscar en
Porto Biomedical Journal
Toda la web
Inicio Porto Biomedical Journal Varicose veins surgical treatment: Endovenous laser ablation versus open surgery
Journal Information
Vol. 2. Issue 5.
Pages 242 (September - October 2017)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 2. Issue 5.
Pages 242 (September - October 2017)
PS118
Open Access
Varicose veins surgical treatment: Endovenous laser ablation versus open surgery
Visits
1877
Tomas Liaudginas
Corresponding author
tliaudginas@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Vaida Kazlauskaitė
Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text

Aim: Compare long-term outcomes of varicose veins treatment between endovenous laser ablation and open surgery.

Introduction: 25–33% of the Western population adults is suffering from varicose veins and surgical treatment is characterized by high recurrence rate of 60% after 5 years follow-up observation. That leads to look for the most effective treatment option.

Methods: A retrospective study of 182 patients who had varicose veins endovascular or open surgery during 2015-06–2015-12 were made. Patients’ demographic and clinical data were registered. Patients were contacted and asked to evaluate surgery outcomes subjectively. Patients were divided in two groups: I – ones who had endovenous laser ablation and II – those who had open surgery.

Results: 136 (74.7%) patients agreed to participate in the study: 26 (19.1%) men and 110 (80.9%) women; average age – 48.36 years (±1.087). 65 (47.8%) – group I, (41 (63.1%) were operated because of the symptoms, 24 (36.9%) were operated because of the esthetical reasons), 71 (52.2%) – group II, (58 (81.7%) were operated because of the symptoms, 13 (18.3%) were operated because of the esthetical reasons.) The symptoms renewed: group I – 9 (22%) patients, group II – 25 (43.1%). Esthetical relapse: group I – 3 (12.5%), group II – 5 (38.5%). Patients assessed esthetical view: group I – 48 (73.8%) were completely satisfied with the results, 15 (23.1%) were partly satisfied and 2 (3.1%) were unsatisfied, respectively in group II the results were 44 (62%), 26 (36.6%) and 1 (1.4%) (p=0.202). Patients also evaluated their symptoms after treatment. Group I: 53 (81.5%) patients were completely satisfied, 9(13.8%) – partly satisfied, 3 (4.6%) – unsatisfied, respectively in group II – 52 (73.2%), 14 (19.7%) and 5 (7%) (p=0.513). According to the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire patients treated in group I evaluated their health – 80.29 (±13.199), II – 74.56 (±16.615).

Conclusion: Chronic venous insufficiency symptoms more often renewed to patients who had open surgery. Patients’ were more satisfied after endovenous laser ablation. Also, those patients who were treated with endovascular procedure evaluated their health better.

Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos