Regístrese
Buscar en
Neurología (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Neurología (English Edition) Practical application of brief cognitive tests
Journal Information
Vol. 31. Issue 3.
Pages 183-194 (April 2016)
Visits
1647
Vol. 31. Issue 3.
Pages 183-194 (April 2016)
Review article
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2015.07.005
Full text access
Practical application of brief cognitive tests
Aplicación práctica de los test cognitivos breves
Visits
1647
J. Olazarána, M.C. Hoyos-Alonsob, T. del Serc, A. Garrido Barrald, J.L. Conde-Salae, F. Bermejo-Parejaf, S. López-Pousag,h, D. Pérez-Martínezi, A. Villarejo-Galendef, J. Cachoj, E. Navarrok, A. Oliveros-Cidl, J. Peña-Casanovam, C. Carnero-Pardon,o,
Corresponding author
ccarnero@neurocenter.es

Corresponding author.
a Servicio de Neurología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
b Centro de Salud Pedro Laín Entralgo, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
c Centro Alzheimer Fundación Reina Sofía–Fundación CIEN, Madrid, Spain
d Centro de Salud Universitario Barrio del Pilar, Unidad Docente Norte, Madrid, Spain
e Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
f Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
g Departamento de Neurología, Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
h Unidad de Valoración de la Memoria y Demencias, Instituto de Asistencia Sanitaria, Salt, Girona, Spain
i Sección de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Parla, Madrid, Spain
j Unidad de Demencia, Hospital de la Santísima Trinidad, Salamanca, Spain
k Sección de Neurología, Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
l Departamento de Medicina Interna, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Reina Sofía, Tudela, Navarra, Spain
m Sección de Neurología de la Conducta y Demencias, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
n Unidad de Neurología Cognitiva y Conductual, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
o FIDYAN Neurocenter, Granada, Spain
This item has received
1647
Visits
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (3)
Table 1. Definition of the levels of care used in this article.
Table 2. BCT validation studies for the detection of CI conducted in Spain.
Table 3. Brief cognitive tests: general characteristics and guidelines for use.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Introduction

Brief cognitive tests (BCT) may help detect cognitive impairment (CI) in the clinical setting. Several BCT have been developed and/or validated in our country, but we lack specific recommendations for use.

Development

Review of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of BCT for CI, using studies conducted in Spain with BCT which take less than 20minutes. We provide recommendations of use based on expert consensus and established on the basis of BCT characteristics and study results.

Conclusion

The Fototest, the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) are the preferred options in primary care; other BCT (Clock Drawing Test [CDT], test of verbal fluency [TVF]) may also be administered in cases of negative results with persistent suspected CI or concern (stepwise approach). In the specialised care setting, a systematic assessment of the different cognitive domains should be conducted using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the MMSE, the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment, the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, or by means of a stepwise or combined approach involving more simple tests (CDT, TVF, Fototest, MIS, Memory Alteration Test, Eurotest). Associating an informant questionnaire (IQ) with the BCT is superior to the BCT alone for the detection of CI.

The choice of instruments will depend on the patient's characteristics, the clinician's experience, and available time. The BCT and IQ must reinforce—but never substitute—clinical judgement, patient–doctor communication, and inter-professional dialogue.

Keywords:
Brief cognitive tests
Cognitive impairment
Detection
Screening
Primary care
Specialised care
Resumen
Introducción

Los test cognitivos breves (TCB) pueden ayudar a detectar el deterioro cognitivo (DC) en el ámbito asistencial. Se han desarrollado y/o validado varios TCB en nuestro país, pero no existen recomendaciones específicas para su uso.

Desarrollo

Revisión de estudios sobre el rendimiento diagnóstico en la detección del DC llevados a cabo en España con TCB que requieran menos de 20min y recomendaciones de uso consensuadas por expertos, sobre la base de las características de los TCB y de los estudios disponibles.

Conclusión

El Fototest, el Memory Impairment Screen (MIS) y el Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) son las opciones más recomendables para el primer nivel asistencial, pudiendo añadirse otros test (Test del Reloj [TR] y test de fluidez verbal [TFV]) en caso de resultado negativo y queja o sospecha persistente (aproximación escalonada). En el segundo nivel asistencial es conveniente una evaluación sistemática de las distintas áreas cognitivas, que puede llevarse a cabo con instrumentos como el Montreal Cognitive Assessment, el MMSE, el Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment o el Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, o bien mediante el uso escalonado o combinado de herramientas más simples (TR, TFV, Fototest, MIS, Test de Alteración de la Memoria y Eurotest). El uso asociado de cuestionarios cumplimentados por un informador (CCI) aporta valor añadido a los TCB en la detección del DC.

La elección de los instrumentos vendrá condicionada por las características del paciente, la experiencia del clínico y el tiempo disponible. Los TCB y los CCI deben reforzar —pero nunca suplantar— el juicio clínico, la comunicación con el paciente y el diálogo interprofesional.

Palabras clave:
Test cognitivos breves
Deterioro cognitivo
Detección
Cribado
Atención primaria
Atención especializada
Full Text
Introduction

Population ageing has increased the prevalence of cognitive impairment (CI) and dementia associated with neurodegenerative, vascular, psychiatric, or other medical conditions, many of which are modifiable.1,2 Early diagnosis is vital, as professionals, governments, and groups involved advocate, since there are both preventive and palliative pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments which can significantly reduce the personal, family, and social burden.3–6

Most of the cases of dementia are preceded by an objectively measured cognitive dysfunction called mild CI (MCI).7–9 This syndromic entity, although aetiologically heterogeneous, involves a high risk of developing dementia,10 but it also offers a great opportunity to assess possible preventive interventions.2 In normal clinical practice, patients who visit our consultation are in different stages of CI, and the line separating MCI and dementia is not clear. Therefore, it seems logical to focus diagnostic efforts towards the identification of the complete CI spectrum, both the earliest variants (MCI) and the more advanced ones (dementia).

A recent population-based study conducted in patients older than 65 in Spain reported a prevalence of MCI of 20%.11 Despite this high prevalence, many of these cases are still to be diagnosed12 or properly registered,13 in contrast to the high frequency of memory loss complaints reported in medical consultations.14 The reasons for this underdiagnosis could be: lack of access or time during consultations, limited training, confidence or diagnostic certainty of professionals, lack of efficient detection tools, or inappropriate use of these tools.15

When MCI is suspected, it is fundamental to first rule out confusional syndrome or acute or subacute (less than 3 months of progression) focal neurological symptoms. These symptoms are markedly different from CI (of chronic nature), need emergency care (usually in-hospital),9 and require assessment with specific tools.16 By definition, CI must be detected and diagnosed using tests that assess the patient's cognitive capacities within the traditional yet irreplaceable framework of the clinical method.17 The information provided by a close acquaintance (regarding cognitive capabilities and performance of daily activities) and the results on the mental state examination (MSE)18 are especially important for the clinical method (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Clinical method adapted to the diagnosis of cognitive impairment. The dotted line indicates tasks shared between primary care and specialised care. *Specific elements.

(0.12MB).

Excellent review studies on the diagnostic value of brief cognitive tests (BCT) for detecting dementia have been conducted.19–21 However, their usefulness in detecting CI has been much less studied.21 The aim of this study is to review the usefulness of BCT and offer recommendations on their rational use in healthcare settings as the first approach to patients with suspected CI or cognitive complaints. We hope to aid in the achievement of more efficient and accurate diagnoses and early therapeutic intervention which could prevent or delay development of dementia, and reduce its high personal, family, and social costs.

DevelopmentMethods

This review article assesses the main characteristics of BCT and offers recommendations for use in clinical practice. In general, any cognitive test which takes less than 20minutes to be administered is a BCT. In issuing recommendations for use, we considered the 2 main levels in which healthcare systems are organised: first level or primary care (PC) and second level or specialised care (SC). The first level of care normally constitutes patients’ first encounter with the healthcare system. This level provides outpatient care at a healthcare centre or at the patients’ home and also includes prevention and early detection strategies. The second level provides care to patients transferred from the first and second levels through consultations, admitted patient units, home-based care units, and emergency services. Healthcare services also interact with other social and healthcare institutions that provide additional care services or cover specific needs (medium-stay hospitals, day care centres, institutions for the elderly, etc.). Table 1 shows the definition of levels of care, adapted to the goals of this study.

Table 1.

Definition of the levels of care used in this article.

  First level of care (PC)  Second level of care (SC) 
Definition  Area of medical intervention, public or private, which the patient or an informant visits on their own initiative  The patient is referred by another professional, from any speciality or healthcare level, due to suspicion of cognitive impairment 
Professionals involved  General practitioners and nurses  Neurologists, psychologists, geriatric specialists, psychiatrists, internists 

The most accessible and immediate level of care is PC, and professionals at this level have a longitudinal perspective of the patient which is essential for detecting CI, especially when patients have a high education or intellectual level, or there is no informant available. Professionals at the SC level do not usually have previous knowledge of the patient. However, they do have more experience and resources for less common tasks. PC is, therefore, the correct level for detection and early management of CI, while SC is the right level for confirming diagnoses, determining the aetiology, and starting specific treatment.

This article does not address systematic detection of CI in the population, since this process5 and its methodology are unclear.22 We have not assessed either telephone or internet-based cognitive tests, or self-administered tests or those administered by a caregiver. These may be useful options for patients living in isolated areas, having impaired mobility or other health problems, or with little motivation to go to a clinic, but evidence is still limited as to their efficacy.23–25 We briefly describe BCTs which have been validated for detecting CI in Spain, and offer guidelines for their use. Tests are presented according to their administration time and only relevant data are mentioned. More information on the characteristics, method of administration, and diagnostic yield of each test can be found in Table 2, as well as in the validation studies mentioned in the table,25–39 and in a recently published monograph.40 To make comparisons between different BCTs easier, we have described only diagnostic accuracy parameters (sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve [AUC]) corresponding to the cut-off point that maximises the sum of the sensitivity and specificity values.

Table 2.

BCT validation studies for the detection of CI conducted in Spain.

BCT  Scope  No. of subjects (CN/MCI/DEM)  COP  Spec  AUC  Observations  Reference 
GIT (5×5)  SC  192 (62/NS/NS)  19/20  0.89  0.82  0.94    Ferrero-Arias 200126 
Clock drawing test  SC  153 (66/21/66)  8/9  0.76  0.70  0.88  Score range: 0-10  Cacho 201027 
  PC  307 (131/112/64)  5/6  0.76  0.78  0.84a  Score range: 0-7, consecutive recruitment  Carnero-Pardo 201328 
Mini-Cog  PC  307 (131/112/64)  1/2  0.60  0.90  0.78a  Consecutive recruitment  Carnero-Pardo 201328 
Episodic memory test  SC  332 (152/115/65)  19/20  0.89  0.82  0.94  Amnestic-type MCI and dementia due to AD  Ojea-Ortega 201325 
Fototest  SC  378 (225/58/95)  28/29  0.90  0.90  0.95  12% illiterate  Carnero Pardo 200729 
  PC  140 (55/37/48)  28/29  0.69  0.93  NS  Consecutive recruitment, 14% illiterate  Carnero-Pardo 201130 
  SC  589 (361/106/122)  28/29  0.71  0.84  0.95  Multi-centre study  Carnero-Pardo 201231 
  SC  407 (105/99/203)  28/29  0.83  0.96  0.93    Carnero Pardo 201332 
MIS  SC  120 (43/19/29)  4/5  0.92  0.81  0.92  76% with no primary studies  Pérez-Martínez 200533 
  PC  140 (55/37/48)  4/5  0.73  0.87  NS  Consecutive recruitment, was not applied to 14% of illiterate patients  Carnero-Pardo 201130 
M@T  SC  88 (27/27/34)  36/37  0.93  1.00  0.99  Only amnestic-type MCI included  Rami 200734 
  PC  139 (56/36/47)  According to level of educationb  0.88  0.68  NS  Consecutive recruitment, 14% illiterate  Carnero-Pardo 201135 
Eurotest  PC  139 (56/36/47)  22/23  0.77  0.93  NS  Consecutive recruitment, 14% illiterate  Carnero-Pardo 201135 
MMSE  SC  91 (43/19/29)  NS  NS  NS  0.86a  MEC version (score range: 0-35)  Pérez-Martínez 200533 
  SC  88 (27/27/34)  26/27  0.79  0.84  0.88a  Only amnestic-type MCI included  Rami 200936 
  SC  153 (66/21/66)  23/24  0.86  0.84  0.90    Cacho 201027 
  SC  194 (63/54/79)  25/26  0.90  0.68  0.90a  Serial subtraction test was not administered and the subject was asked to pick up the paper with the non-dominant hand.  Ferrero-Arias 200126 
  PC  360 (146/137/77)  22/23  0.77  0.77  0.84  Backward spelling test was not administered  Carnero-Pardo 201337 
MoCA  SC  103 (21/51/31)  19/20  0.76  0.77  0.78    Lozano-Gallego 200938 
RUDAS  SC  115 (50/26/39)  21/22  0.83  0.86  0.90    Ramos-Rios 200939 

ACE-III, Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (3rd version); MCI, mild cognitive impairment; SC, specialised care; PC, primary care; AUC, area under the ROC curve; CN, cognitively normal; CI, cognitive impairment; DEM, dementia; S, specificity; AD, Alzheimer disease; MEC, Mini-Examen Cognoscitivo; MIS, Memory Impairment Screen; MMSE, Mini-mental State Examination; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; NS, non-specified; COP, cut-off point; RUDAS, Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment; S, sensitivity; T@M, memory alteration test; BCT, brief cognitive tests; GIT, general information test; FT, Fototest.

a

BCT influence on diagnosis of cognitive impairment.

b

36/37 if <8 years of schooling, 37/38 if >8 years of schooling.

Brief cognitive tests

The animal category fluency trial which lasts just a minute is the briefest dementia detection test studied.41 It addresses linguistic and executive skills exclusively, so this type of test is not recommended as the first option to detect CI. Verbal fluency tests (VFT) offer extremely useful qualitative and quantitative data within the context of a more comprehensive evaluation. The animal naming test and the test that asks the patient to produce as many words beginning with ‘p’ in a minute as possible are the most recommended, since they are complementary and have been well studied in Spain.42,43 There are some variants, such as the Isaac Set Test44 and the general information test or the five by five test,26 which make administration longer and more difficult without improving diagnostic usefulness. Therefore, they are not recommended as alternatives.

The clock drawing test (CDT) assesses visuospatial ability (VA) and executive functions (EF).45 Despite the appeal of its simplicity and short administration time, the CDT is not enough in and of itself to detect CI,27 not even in the context of PC28 (Table 2). Nevertheless, the CDT is very sensitive to damage to the right parietal lobe and is definitely helpful as a supplement to other brief tests, especially when no abnormal performance in memory tests has been detected. In fact, CDT has been included successfully in several more comprehensive tests, as we will describe later. Its main disadvantage is that minimum drawing skills are necessary to complete the test, which makes the CDT inappropriate as a tool for illiterate patients or those with limited graphomotor skills. There are several proposals for scoring; the simplest proposals are the most appropriate for detecting CI while the most complex may be more useful for monitoring studies and case analysis.46,47

Mini-Cog includes the most frequently affected areas at CI onset. It includes a 3 word learning test similar to the Folstein Mini-mental State Examination (episodic memory [EM] and CDT [VA, EF]). Its score range is narrow (0-5: one point for every recalled word, and 2 additional qualitative assessment points if the clock has all numbers, in the correct order, and the clock hands point to the requested time) and has little sensitivity for detecting CI28 (Table 2) and its monitoring study. Mini-Cog is most useful in supporting a diagnosis of dementia, especially in relatively clear cases according to medical records.

The episodic memory test has been recently created and validated in a sample of patients with amnestic-type MCI and Alzheimer disease (AD)25 (Table 2). This is a user-friendly test which does not require paper or pencil (presumably it is little influenced by education level). It exclusively assesses EM through questions regarding the recent past. Its main disadvantage is that a reliable informant must be present to corroborate the veracity of the answers.

Fototest comprises a visual-verbal naming task with 6 photographs of objects (language), a verbal fluency task (language, EF), and an EM task with free and cued recall of the previously named images. Together with the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Fototest is the most extensively studied BCT for the detection of CI in Spain. This is a widely accepted tool that in both PC and SC has shown a satisfactory usefulness in detecting CI, with a stable cut-off point (28/29).29,31,32,35 Fototest has also shown a higher cost-effectiveness ratio than MMSE in PC, with the additional advantage of having equivalent parallel versions which may be of help in reducing the practice effect in the case of repeated administrations (PC, follow-up)48 (Table 2).

The Memory Impairment Screen (MIS) assesses verbal learning (EM) through reading and subsequent free and cued recall of 4 words. There are several validation studies conducted in Spain that have shown acceptable results for detecting CI30,33 (Table 2) and good results for dementia,30,33,49 especially if due to AD.50 The MIS also presents a good correlation with hippocampal formation and entorhinal cortex volumes,51 which supports its potential for early detection of AD.

The memory alteration test (M@T) includes items related with EM (free and cued recall, time orientation) and general information items (long-term/semantic memory [SM]) to a lesser extent. These characteristics, together with the wide score range (0-50), make it especially appropriate for detecting and monitoring the first clinical stages of typical AD34,36 (Table 2). The M@T distinguishes between subjective memory complaints and MCI, and has been validated using biochemical and neuroimaging markers.52 Although its usefulness in PC has been shown,35 limiting this test to SC seems more realistic and appropriate.

Eurotest is an original proposal for brief cognitive evaluation that uses currency coins and consists of 3 parts: knowledge of current coins (SM), operations with coins (calculation), and recall of the coins used (EM). Eurotest, which enables to some degree the functional evaluation of the ability to handle money, has obtained acceptable results in the detection of CI35 (Table 2) and good results for dementia.53,54 It is an ecologically valid test applicable to illiterate patients which has additionally been used with different currency systems, including Chinese.

The MMSE, with its countless adaptations and translations,55–59 is the most widely used BCT in the world, both in PC and SC settings. This extensive use, which enables the comparison and follow-up of subjects from different origins, has 2 main disadvantages, which are mainly due to the existence of multiple versions and the lack of clear instructions for scoring60: a questionable standard administration procedure and unreliability. Other limitations of the MMSE are the limited representation of EF, which diminishes its sensitivity in detecting MCI and frontotemporal dementia, and restrictions to its free use due to its recent copyright licence.61 The MMSE has been traditionally employed for the detection of dementia55,59,62,63; most of the information regarding its usefulness in CI detection comes from validation studies of other tools which included the MMSE as a comparison test. In other studies, the usefulness of the MMSE was, in general, lower than that of the tests to which it was compared27,30,33,36 (Table 2). In the only specific evaluation study of the MMSE for CI, the best performance was obtained with a lower than usual (22/23) cut-off point (COP) and in addition, adjusting for age and education did not improve its discriminant ability, unlike in common practice.28 In any case, MMSE helps to obtain qualitative profiles or features that give confidence to the clinician in the diagnosis and follow up, especially in the case of patients with typical AD. Some examples are the selective alteration of items related to EM (deferred recall, day of the month) in the case of prodromal AD, transformation of pentagons into quadrilaterals in AD with mild dementia, and impaired orientation to month and problems with naming a pencil in the case of moderate AD.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has an eclectic and balanced design for the detection of MCI regardless of aetiology. It includes items regarding attention, free recall (list of 5 words), EF (Trail Making Test, similarities), calculation, VA (copy a cube, CDT), orientation, and language. The first validation studies, conducted in Canada, obtained promising results.64 However, a Spanish study showed a lower effectiveness in the detection of MCI (69% of the subjects were correctly classified vs 90% in the original study)38 (Table 2). Education level exerts a strong influence on the MoCA, as was shown in validation studies conducted in other countries.

The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment (RUDAS) was developed in Australia for its administration to multicultural and illiterate populations. It assesses identification of body parts, EM, visuoconstructive praxis (drawing a cube), and reasoning. A preliminary study conducted in Spain obtained good results in the detection of CI39 (Table 2).

There are 2 BCTs which have been validated in non-clinical community settings and which therefore do not meet inclusion criteria in this review article. However, we mention them here since they can be useful in PC.

The Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) by Hodkinson assesses orientation, attention, and memory. The test, which includes 10 items, is easy to administer (except the item requiring the identification of 2 people), and education level is less influential. A COP of 7/8 showed a good performance in the detection of MCI65 and dementia.66 The AMT is rarely used in Spain, possibly due to its limited distribution and availability.

The Leganés cognitive test (LCT) was designed to assess the cognitive capacities of an elderly population with a low level of education.67 It yielded excellent results for the detection of dementia (COP 22/23) and good for CI (COP 26/27).68 Since most of its items are related to EM, the LCT can be useful for detecting and monitoring typical AD when advanced age, low education level, or other circumstances advise against administering more complex tests.

Other commonly used BCTs in Spain which have been specifically evaluated for use with dementia although not for CI are the following:

The Pfeiffer questionnaire (Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire [SPMSQ]) is similar to the AMT, although more focused on SM. Mistakes instead of correct answers are scored. The SPMSQ obtained good results in the detection of dementia in PC69 and SC (COP 2/3),70 and excellent results in geriatric settings (COP 4/5).71

The 7 Minute Screen (7MS), which requires somewhat more than 7minutes to administer, presents some characteristics (16 figure learning task, complex score system) that make it difficult to use as a first approach to CI in the healthcare setting. However, being halfway between MSE and formal neuropsychological examination (Fig. 1), it can be a useful tool in the assessment of cognitive areas usually impaired in AD. The 7MS achieves an excellent performance in the detection of dementia (COP 20/21),70,72 but an Argentinian study has questioned its usefulness in MCI.73

The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE) was developed from the MMSE, adding frontal/executive and visuospatial elements. Its third version (ACE-III) is currently available and has shown good results with regards to dementia detection,74 and excellent results with subjects with more than 9 years of schooling (COP 73/74). The ACE can also be useful in distinguishing the main aetiological types of dementia.75 An abbreviated version has been recently validated (M-ACE) which may have more discriminant ability than the original version.76

Limits of the brief cognitive tests: new action and research lines

Without questioning its usefulness and convenience, the diagnostic capability of BCT is far from being completely satisfactory, especially regarding the detection of CI. One solution would be adding more items and areas in order to test more cognitive skills with more detail, but then the test would become less efficient and require more time and specialised personnel. In that case the screening tool and the gold standard would be nearly the same. Another possible solution might consist of using more complex tasks involving diverse cognitive skills, including processing speed (divided attention tasks, figural fluency, etc.).77 However, a more complex and difficult task is likely to lead to greater influence by non-pathological factors (ageing, stress, etc.), thereby reducing specificity. Using questionnaires on cognitive complaints or metacognition is another option, but this has been demonstrated as less than useful due to the influence of lesion topography, psychiatric comorbidity, and psychological and social factors.78

Informant questionnaires are generally simple, easy to administer tools that offer a perspective (longitudinal and that of the informant) supplementary to the one offered by cognitive tests.79 The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) or informant test is the most widely studied questionnaire in Spain. Both the complete version (26 items) and the abbreviated version (17 items) have shown a good performance in the detection of dementia,80–82 achieving an AUC of 0.91 in one of the studies.82 Furthermore, this questionnaire is not influenced by age, sex, mental health, or prior intellectual level.62 Performance of the IQCODE for the detection of CI was lower (AUC 0.75) in another study, while its incorporation added predictive value to the MMSE (AUC 0.86 vs 0.82 with MMSE only). The Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) comprises 11 items and has also obtained good results in the detection of dementia (AUC 0.91), although results are poorer for detecting CI (AUC 0.77). The FAQ, like the IQCODE, improved the performance of the MMSE for detecting dementia (AUC 0.95 vs 0.91 with MMSE only).83 The Ascertain Dementia-8 (AD 8) is a very brief proposal, designed for PC. It includes 8 yes or no questions and presents a good performance for diagnosing CI (AUC 0.90). Furthermore, its use associated with a BCT (Fototest) adds predictive value (AUC of Fototest 0.93 vs AUC of Fototest plus AD 8 0.96).32

Physical examination (motor alterations, frontal signs, etc.) or biological sample analysis (blood, saliva, etc.) could provide other complementary markers for the detection of CI. But these lines of research, though interesting for aetiological diagnosis, have not yet provided evidence of practical usefulness.84,85

Conclusions

A first approach to the patient with complaint or suspicion of CI should at minimum include the examination of the more frequently impaired areas (EM and EF). In PC we recommend using some BCT as that could offer objective support to the clinical suspicion and facilitate an efficient referral to SC to obtain an accurate diagnosis. Fototest and MIS have been well studied and are the most recommended options for PC. Other tests (CDT, VFT) can be added, especially in the case of negative results and persistent complaints or suspicions (stepped-care approach). Eurotest and MMSE are also valid alternatives in PC, depending on the circumstances (Eurotest for illiterate patients and MMSE if more time is available) (Table 3). The patient's performance in his or her day-to-day social environment should be clearly defined both in PC and SC (money handling, medication, etc.). If impairment is observed, suspicion of dementia and not of MCI should be considered.

Table 3.

Brief cognitive tests: general characteristics and guidelines for use.

BCT  Time (min)  Assessed areas  Advantages  Disadvantages  Guidelines for use  Scope  Restrictions on use  Accessibility 
VFT  L, EF  Very user-friendly  It does not assess EM and requires a stopwatch  It complements other tests  PC, SC  No restrictions or licenses   
Clock drawing test  EF, VA  User-friendly, helpful to locate the lesion  It does not assess EM. It includes multiple scoring scales and requires graphomotor skills  It complements other tests  PC, SC  No restrictions or licenses   
Mini-Cog  EM, EF, VA  Multi-domain  The score range is narrow. It requires graphomotor skills  Detection of dementia  PC  No restrictions or licenses   
AMT  EM, SM, A  Applicable to illiterate patients  Low accessibility and little experience  Detection of dementia  PC  No restrictions or licenses   
SPMSQ  EM, SM, A  Applicable to illiterate patients  Prior data should be known. It is not validated for CI  Detection of dementia  PC  No restrictions or licenses  www.hipocampo.org 
Fototest  EM, EF, L  Applicable to illiterate subjects. It assesses free and cued recall. Parallel versions  It requires a minimum visual acuity  Detection and follow-up of CI and dementia  PC, SC  Clinical use permitted, under Creative Commons license  www.fototest.es, www.hipocampo.org (online version) 
MIS  EM  Free and cued recall assessment  Reading is needed. It only assesses memory  Detection of CI  PC  Copyright-limited use   
M@T  EM, SM  Applicable to illiterate subjects. It assesses free and cued recall, and SM  It only assesses memory  Detection and follow-up of amnestic-type CI and typical AD  SC  Clinical use permitted under copyright  www.hipocampo.org 
Eurotest  EF, EM, SM, NS  Applicable to illiterate patients, functional assessment  It requires a minimum visual acuity and having coins at hand  Detection and follow-up of CI and dementia  PC, SC  Clinical use permitted, under Creative Commons license  www.eurotest.es 
MMSE  10  EM, SM, EF, L, A, VA  Universal use, qualitative features  Multiple versions, influence of educational factors  Detection and follow-up of CI and dementia  SC, PC  Copyright-limited use  http://web.teaediciones.com/Inicio.aspx (MEC version) 
LCT  11  EM, L, A, SM  Applicable to the elderly and illiterate subjects  It does not assess EF or VA. Limited distribution  Detection and follow-up of CI and dementia  PC  No restrictions or licenses   
MoCA  12  EM, SM, EF, L, A, VA  Easy administration, and balanced structure  Little experience in Spain  Detection and follow-up of CI and dementia  SC  Clinical use permitted under copyright  www.mocatest.org 
7MT  13  EM, EF, L, VA  Standardised scoring with a wide range  Scrupulous scoring. It requires a wide range of material (pictures, stopwatch, pencil)  Detection and follow-up of CI and dementia  SC  Copyright-limited use   
RUDAS  13  EM, EF, L, VA  Applicable to illiterate subjects, balanced structure  Little experience in Spain  Detection and follow-up of CI and dementia  SC  Clinical use permitted under copyright  http://www.health.qld.gov.au/tpch/html/rudas.asp (in English) 
ACE-III  16  EM, SM, EF, L, A, VA  Wide-range scoring. It distinguishes between cognitive profiles  Time-consuming administration. Influence of educational factors. Little experience in Spain  Detection and follow-up of CI and dementia of different profiles  SC  Clinical use permitted under copyright  https://www.neura.edu.au/frontier/download-form?test=aceiii (registration needed) 

A, attention; ACE-III, Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (3rd version); SC, specialised care; AMT, Abbreviated Mental Test; PC, primary care; VA, visuospatial area; NS, numerical skills; CI, cognitive impairment; FTLD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration; AD, Alzheimer disease; EF, frontal/executive functions; L, language; EM, episodic memory; MEC, Mini-Cog; min, minutes; MIS, Memory Impairment Screen; MMSE, Mini-mental State Examination; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; SM, remote/semantic memory; LCT, Leganés cognitive test; RUDAS, Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment; SPMSQ, Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire; M@T, Memory alteration test; VFT, verbal fluency test (animals, words beginning with ‘p’); 7MT, 7 Minute Screen.

A systematic review of the main cognitive areas (attention, language, EM, EF, VA) must be conducted in SC, so a formal neuropsychological examination would be the ideal test (Fig. 1). For this reason, the most recommended tools for this level of care are, theoretically, those permitting evaluation of the highest number of cognitive domains, such as MoCA, MMSE, RUDAS, or ACE-III. These tests should be selected according to patient characteristics (MoCA if the patient is close to normality, MMSE if advanced CI is suspected, RUDAS if the patient is illiterate, ACE-III if in doubt between AD and frontotemporal lobar degeneration), the clinician's experience, and the available time (ACE-III administration requires more than 15minutes). Maybe due to the lack of specific studies (ACE-III), modest or negative results available (MMSE, MoCA),30,38 or the presence of other disadvantages (MMSE is not free),60,61 it is still to be determined whether the use of these tools is more efficient than the use of other brief and simple cognitive tests. This determination should consider that tests can be administered separately (MIS,33 M@T,36 and Fototest30), combined (VFT, CDT, and MMSE)27,28 or in a stepped-care approach (Fototest and Eurotest),86 particularly in situations with little time available.

Possible actions to avoid false negatives are varied and efficacious, and implementable in developed countries with enough healthcare and social resources. These include promoting a healthy lifestyle, controlling vascular risk factors, advising, researching, etc. These measures are not risky or costly, and all of them can be addressed or monitored by PC. Using cut-off points other than those recommended is acceptable in order to increase sensitivity and facilitate early detection, especially in cases of persistent complaint or suspicion or in subjects with a prior high intellectual level. Cut-off points serve as a guide and support, but never as confirmation of the diagnosis of CI, which is obtained by clinically assessing all the information available (Fig. 1).

To diagnose dementia, informant questionnaires perform the same or even better than BCT. This is most likely because a large number of older people in Spain have a low level of schooling, resulting in lower specificity of cognitive tests. However, an MSE should be performed whenever possible, since the target is CI (MCI or dementia) and the informant's perceptions might not be valid, or might be distorted by primarily non-cognitive aspects (physical health, sensory deficit, etc.), or even self-interest. Informant questionnaires provide added value to BCT, and this synergy should be further investigated. Rigorous, non-stop and imaginative research here in Spain has led to the designing of varied and complementary BCT, which are useful to increase clinicians’ confidence and accuracy in their first approach to the patient with complaint or suspicion of CI. The recommended BCT as well as their cut-off points and instructions, must be accessible in the electronic medical histories in PC and SC when possible in order to facilitate use and make it more cost-effective. BCT potential should be further explored, especially regarding aetiological diagnosis (for example, Eurotest may help detect CI caused by anything other than typical AD)87 and its usefulness in progression monitoring. Tests and questionnaires should reinforce but never replace medical opinion, fluid communication with patients and their acquaintances, coordination between the different healthcare levels, and dialogue between professionals in healthcare settings.

Conflicts of interest

C. Carnero-Pardo is the creator of Fototest and Eurotest. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References
[1]
M.A. Beydoun, H.A. Beydoun, A.A. Gamaldo, A. Teel, A.B. Zonderman, Y. Wang.
Epidemiologic studies of modifiable factors associated with cognition and dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC Public Health, 14 (2014), pp. 643
[2]
F. Bermejo-Pareja.
La demencia del anciano se puede prevenir.
Rev Neurol, 51 (2010), pp. 257-258
[3]
M. Prince, R. Bryce, C. Ferri.
World Alzheimer report 2011: the benefits of early diagnosis and intervention.
Alzheimer's Disease International, (2011),
[4]
S. Iliffe, J. Manthorpe, A. Eden.
Sooner or later? Issues in the early diagnosis of dementia in general practice: a qualitative study.
Fam Pract, 20 (2003), pp. 376-381
[5]
J.S. Lin, E. O’Connor, R.C. Rossom, L.A. Perdue, E. Eckstrom.
Screening for cognitive impairment in older adults: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Ann Intern Med, 159 (2013), pp. 601-612
[6]
Grupo de trabajo de la GPC sobre la atención integral a las personas con enfermedad de Alzheimer y otras demencia.
Guías de Práctica Clínica en el SNS. Guía de Práctica Clínica sobre la Atención Integral a las Personas con Enfermedad de Alzheimer y Otras Demencias.
Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad y Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, (2011),
[7]
R.C. Petersen, G.E. Smith, S.C. Waring, R.J. Ivnik, E.G. Tangalos, E. Kokmen.
Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome.
Arch Neurol, 56 (1999), pp. 303-308
[8]
B. Winblad, K. Palmer, M. Kivipelto, V. Jelic, L. Fratiglioni, L.O. Wahlund, et al.
Mild cognitive impairment—beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on mild cognitive impairment.
J Intern Med, 256 (2004), pp. 240-246
[9]
J. Olazarán Rodríguez, F. Bermejo Pareja.
Alteración cognitiva leve en la práctica clínica.
Med Clin (Barc), 137 (2011), pp. 414-418
[10]
A.J. Mitchell, M. Shiri-Feshki.
Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia—meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies.
Acta Psychiatr Scand, 119 (2009), pp. 252-265
[11]
D. Gavrila, C. Antunez, M.J. Tormo, R. Carles, J.M. Garcia Santos, G. Parrilla, et al.
Prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment in Southeastern Spain: the Ariadna study.
Acta Neurol Scand, 120 (2009), pp. 300-307
[12]
M.V. Zunzunegui Pastor, T. del Ser, A. Rodriguez Laso, M.J. García Yébenes, J. Domingo, A. Otero Puime.
Demencia no detectada y utilización de los servicios sanitarios: implicaciones para la atención primaria.
Aten Primaria, 31 (2003), pp. 581-586
[13]
M.D. De Hoyos-Alonso, J. Bonis, V. Bryant, M.V. Castell Alcalá, A. Otero Puime.
Calidad del registro del diagnóstico de demencia en atención primaria. La situación en España en el periodo 2002-2011.
[14]
J. Morera-Guitart, M.J. Pedro Cano.
Variación en la patología atendida en las consultas de Neurología: un futuro demencial.
Neurologia, 18 (2003), pp. 417-424
[15]
G. Coll de Tuero, J. Garre-Olmo, S. Lopez-Pousa, J. Vilalta, E. Limón, C. Caja, et al.
Percepción, actitudes y necesidades de los profesionales de atención primaria con relación al paciente con demencia.
Aten Primaria, 43 (2011), pp. 585-594
[16]
A. Morandi, J. McCurley, E.E. Vasilevskis, D.M. Fick, G. Bellelli, P. Lee, et al.
Tools to detect delirium superimposed on dementia: a systematic review.
J Am Geriatr Soc, 60 (2012), pp. 2005-2013
[17]
A. Ropper, M. Samuels, Klein J. Adams.
Victor's principles of neurology.
10th ed., McGraw-Hill, (2014),
[18]
R. Strub, F. Black.
The bedside mental status examination.
Handbook of neurosychology, pp. 29-46
[19]
J. Peña-Casanova, A. Monllau, N. Gramunt Fombuena.
La psicometría de las demencias a debate.
Neurologia, 22 (2007), pp. 301-311
[20]
A. Villarejo, V. Puertas-Martín.
Utilidad de los test breves en el cribado de demencia.
Neurologia, 26 (2011), pp. 425-433
[21]
I. Contador, B. Fernández-Calvo, F. Ramos, E. Tapias-Merino, F. Bermejo-Pareja.
El cribado de la demencia en atención primaria. Revisión crítica.
Rev Neurol, 51 (2010), pp. 677-686
[22]
V.A. Moyer, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Screening for cognitive impairment in older adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
Ann Intern Med, 160 (2014), pp. 791-797
[23]
J. Ferrero-Arias, M.A. Turrion-Rojo.
Validación de una versión española del Test Your Memory.
[24]
T.C. Castanho, L. Amorim, J. Zihl, J.A. Palha, N. Sousa, N.C. Santos.
Telephone-based screening tools for mild cognitive impairment and dementia in aging studies: a review of validated instruments.
Front Aging Neurosci, 6 (2014), pp. 16
[25]
T. Ojea-Ortega, M.M. González-Álvarez de Sotomayor, O. Pérez-González, O. Fernández-Fernández.
Un nuevo test para la valoración de la memoria episódica. Test Episódico y Test Episódico del Cuidador.
Neurologia, 28 (2013), pp. 488-496
[26]
J. Ferrero-Arias, M. Sánchez-Saudinós, I. Lamet-Gil.
El test cinco por cinco. Un instrumento breve para la detección de impedimento cognitivo en contextos clínicos.
Neurologia, 16 (2001), pp. 254-261
[27]
J. Cacho, J. Benito-Leon, R. Garcia-Garcia, B. Fernandez-Calvo, J.L. Vicente-Villardon, A.J. Mitchell.
Does the combination of the MMSE and Clock Drawing Test (Mini-Clock) improve the detection of mild Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment?.
J Alzheimers Dis, 22 (2010), pp. 889-896
[28]
C. Carnero-Pardo, I. Cruz-Orduna, B. Espejo-Martinez, C. Martos-Aparicio, S. Lopez-Alcalde, J. Olazaran.
Utility of the Mini-Cog for detection of cognitive impairment in primary care: data from two Spanish studies.
Int J Alzheimers Dis, 2013 (2013),
[29]
C. Carnero Pardo, C. Sáez-Zea, L. Montiel Navarro, P. del Saz, I. Feria Vilar, M.J. Pérez Navarro, et al.
Utilidad diagnóstica del Test de las Fotos (Fototest) en deterioro cognitivo y demencia.
Neurologia, 22 (2007), pp. 860-869
[30]
C. Carnero-Pardo, B. Espejo-Martinez, S. Lopez-Alcalde, M. Espinosa-García, C. Sáez-Zea, R. Vílchez-Carrillo, et al.
Effectiveness and costs of Phototest in dementia and cognitive impairment screening.
BMC Neurol, 11 (2011), pp. 92
[31]
C. Carnero-Pardo, C. Saez-Zea, R. de la Vega Cotarelo, M. Gurpegui, en nombre del grupo F.
Estudio FOTOTRANS: estudio multicéntrico sobre la validez del Fototest en condiciones de práctica clínica.
Neurologia, 27 (2012), pp. 68-75
[32]
C. Carnero Pardo, R. de la Vega Cotarelo, S. López Alcalde, C. Martos Aparicio, R. Vílchez Carrillo, E. Mora Gavilán, et al.
Evaluación de la utilidad diagnóstica de la versión española del cuestionario al informador AD8.
Neurologia, 28 (2013), pp. 88-94
[33]
D.A. Pérez-Martínez, J.J. Baztán, M. González-Becerra, A. Socorro.
Evaluación de la utilidad diagnóstica de una adaptación española del Memory Impairment Screen de Buschke para detectar demencia y deterioro cognitivo.
Rev Neurol, 40 (2005), pp. 644-648
[34]
L. Rami, J.L. Molinuevo, R. Sanchez-Valle, B. Bosch, A. Villar.
Screening for amnestic mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease with M@T (Memory Alteration Test) in the primary care population.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 22 (2007), pp. 294-304
[35]
C. Carnero-Pardo, B. Espejo-Martinez, S. Lopez-Alcalde, M. Espinosa-García, C. Sáez-Zea, E. Hernández-Torrez, et al.
Diagnostic accuracy, effectiveness and cost for cognitive impairment and dementia screening of three short cognitive tests applicable to illiterates.
[36]
L. Rami, B. Bosch, C. Valls-Pedret, C. Caprile, R. Sánchez-Valle Diaz, J.L. Molinuevo.
Validez discriminativa y asociación del Test Mini-Mental (MMSE) y del Test de Alteración de Memoria (T@M) con una batería neuropsicológica en pacientes con deterioro cognitivo leve amnésico y enfermedad de Alzheimer.
Rev Neurol, 49 (2009), pp. 169-174
[37]
C. Carnero-Pardo, I. Cruz Orduña, B. Espejo Martínez, S. Cárdenas Viedma, P. Torrero Garcia, J. Olazarán Rodríguez.
Efectividad del Mini-Mental en la detección del deterioro cognitivo en atención primaria.
Aten Primaria, 45 (2013), pp. 426-433
[38]
M. Lozano-Gallego, M. Hernández, O. Turro, I. Pericot, S. López-Pousa, J. Vilalta.
Validación del Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): test de cribado para el deterioro cognitivo leve. Datos preliminares.
Alzh Real Invest Demenc, 43 (2009), pp. 4-11
[39]
R. Ramos-Ríos, R. Mateos Álvarez, J. López Moriñigo.
Cribado de demencia en una población con un bajo nivel de instrucción. Validación de la versión española del RUDAS (Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale).
Psicogeriatria, 1 (2009), pp. 89-99
[40]
C. Carnero Pardo.
Test cognitivos breves.
Ediciones SEN, (2015),
[41]
C. Carnero-Pardo, A. Lendínez-González.
Utilidad del Test de Fluencia Verbal Semántica en el diagnóstico de demencia.
Rev Neurol, 29 (1999), pp. 709-714
[42]
J. Peña-Casanova, S. Quinones-Ubeda, N. Gramunt-Fombuena, M. Quintana-Aparicio, M. Aguilar, D. Badenes, et al.
Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project): norms for verbal fluency tests.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 24 (2009), pp. 395-411
[43]
G. Sanchez-Benavides, J. Pena-Casanova, M. Casals-Coll, N. Gramunt, J.L. Molinuevo, B. Gomez-Anson, et al.
Cognitive and neuroimaging profiles in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: data from the Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project).
J Alzheimers Dis, 41 (2014), pp. 887-901
[44]
L.F. Pascual Millán, J.V. Martínez Quinones, P. Modrego Pardo, E. Mostacero Miguel, J. López del Val, F. Morales Asín.
El Set-Test en el diagnóstico de la demencia.
Neurologia, 5 (1990), pp. 82-85
[45]
J. Cacho, R. García-García, J. Arcaya, J.L. Vicente, N. Lantada.
Una propuesta de aplicación y puntuación del Test del Reloj en la enfermedad de Alzheimer.
Rev Neurol, 28 (1999), pp. 648-655
[46]
M.A. Fuentes Pérez, J.A. de la Fuente Cadenas, J. Guerrero Desirre, E. Castell Friguls.
Test del Reloj: ¿existe un sistema de puntuación óptimo en atención primaria?.
Aten Primaria, 40 (2008), pp. 476-477
[47]
A. Paganini-Hill, L.J. Clark.
Longitudinal assessment of cognitive function by clock drawing in older adults.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra, 1 (2011), pp. 75-83
[48]
C. Madrid Navarro, I. Carrera Muñoz, L. Triguero Cuerva, S. López Alcalde, E. Espinosa García, C. Carnero Pardo.
Evaluación de la equivalencia de tres versiones paralelas del Fototest.
Alzh Real Invest Demenc, 59 (2015), pp. 6-13
[49]
F.J. Barrero-Hernández, F. Vives-Montero, B. Morales-Gordo.
Evaluación de la versión española del Memory Impairment Screen.
Rev Neurol, 43 (2006), pp. 15-19
[50]
P. Bohm, J. Peña-Casanova, N. Gramunt, R.M. Manero, C. Terrón, S. Quinones-Úbeda.
Versión española del Memory Impairment Screen (MIS): datos normativos y de validez discriminativa.
Neurologia, 20 (2005), pp. 402-411
[51]
G. Sanchez-Benavides, B. Gomez-Anson, J.L. Molinuevo, R. Blesa, G.C. Monte, H. Buschke, et al.
Medial temporal lobe correlates of memory screening measures in normal aging, MCI, and AD.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 23 (2010), pp. 100-108
[52]
L. Rami, B. Bosch, R. Sanchez-Valle, J.L. Molinuevo.
The Memory Alteration Test (M@T) discriminates between subjective memory complaints, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 50 (2010), pp. 171-174
[53]
C. Carnero-Pardo, M.T. Montoro-Ríos.
Evaluación preliminar de un nuevo test de cribado de demencia (Eurotest).
Rev Neurol, 38 (2004), pp. 201-209
[54]
C. Carnero-Pardo, M. Gurpegui, E. Sanchez-Cantalejo, A. Frank, S. Mola, M.S. Barquero, et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of the Eurotest for dementia: a naturalistic, multicenter phase II study.
BMC Neurol, 6 (2006), pp. 15
[55]
A. Lobo, J. Ezquerra, F. Gómez Burgada, J.M. Sala, A. Seva Diaz.
El Mini-Examen Cognoscitivo. Un test sencillo, práctico, para detectar alteraciones intelectuales en pacientes médicos.
Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines, 7 (1979), pp. 189-202
[56]
A. Lobo, P. Saz, G. Marcos, J.L. Día, C. de la Cámara, T. Ventura, et al.
Revalidación y normalización del Mini-Examen Cognoscitivo (primera versión en castellano del Mini-Mental Status Examination) en la población general geriátrica.
Med Clin (Barc), 112 (1999), pp. 767-774
[57]
E. Tolosa, J. Alom, F. Forcadell.
Criterios diagnósticos y escalas evaluativas en la enfermedad de Alzheimer.
Rev Clin Esp, 181 (1987), pp. 56-59
[58]
G. Prieto, I. Contador, E. Tapias-Merino, A.J. Mitchell, F. Bermejo-Pareja.
The Mini-Mental-37 Test for dementia screening in the Spanish population: an analysis using the Rasch model.
Clin Neuropsychol, 26 (2012), pp. 1003-1018
[59]
R. Blesa, M. Pujol, M. Aguilar, P. Santacruz, I. Bertran-Serra, G. Hernandez, et al.
Clinical validity of the ‘mini-mental state’ for Spanish speaking communities.
Neuropsychologia, 39 (2001), pp. 1150-1157
[60]
C. Carnero-Pardo.
¿Es hora de jubilar al Mini-Mental?.
Neurologia, 29 (2014), pp. 473-481
[61]
J.C. Newman.
Copyright and bedside cognitive testing: why we need alternatives to the mini-mental state examination.
[62]
J.M. Morales, F. Bermejo, M. Romero, T. del-Ser.
Screening of dementia in community-dwelling elderly through informant report.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 12 (1997), pp. 808-816
[63]
M. Escribano-Aparicio, M. Pérez-Dively, F. García-García, A. Pérez-Martín, L. Romero, G. Ferrer, et al.
Validación del MMSE en una población española de bajo nivel educativo.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol, 34 (1999), pp. 319-326
[64]
A.J. Larner.
Effect size (Cohen's d) of cognitive screening instruments examined in pragmatic diagnostic accuracy studies.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra, 4 (2014), pp. 236-241
[65]
J.A. Gomez de Caso, F. Rodriguez-Artalejo, L.E. Claveria, F. Coria.
Value of Hodkinson's test for detecting dementia and mild cognitive impairment in epidemiological surveys.
Neuroepidemiology, 13 (1994), pp. 64-68
[66]
C. Sarasqueta, A. Bergareche, A. Arce, A. Lopez de Munain, J.J. Poza, E. de la Puente, et al.
The validity of Hodkinson's Abbreviated Mental Test for dementia screening in Guipuzcoa, Spain.
Eur J Neurol, 8 (2001), pp. 435-440
[67]
M.V. Zunzunegui, P. Gutierrez Cuadra, F. Beland, T. del Ser, C. Wolfson.
Development of simple cognitive function measures in a community dwelling population of elderly in Spain.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 15 (2000), pp. 130-140
[68]
M.J. De Yebenes, A. Otero, M.V. Zunzunegui, A. Rodriguez-Laso, F. Sanchez-Sanchez, T. del Ser.
Validation of a short cognitive tool for the screening of dementia in elderly people with low educational level.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 18 (2003), pp. 925-936
[69]
J. Martínez de la Iglesia, R. Dueñas Herrero, M.C. Onis Vilches, C. Aguado Taberne, C. Albert Colomer, R. Luque Luque.
Adaptación y validación al castellano del cuestionario de Pfeiffer (SPMSQ) para detectar la existencia de deterioro cognitivo en personas mayores de 65 años.
Med Clin (Barc), 117 (2001), pp. 129-134
[70]
C. Carnero-Pardo, M.T. Montoro-Rios.
Test de las Fotos.
Rev Neurol, 39 (2004), pp. 801-806
[71]
J. González-Montalvo, L. Rodríguez, I. Ruipérez.
Validación del cuestionario de Pfeiffer y la Escala de Incapacidad Mental de la Cruz Roja en la detección del deterioro mental en los pacientes externos de un servicio de geriatría.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol, 27 (1992), pp. 129-133
[72]
T. Del Ser, F. Sanchez-Sanchez, M.J. Garcia de Yebenes, A. Otero, D.G. Munoz.
Validation of the seven-minute screen neurocognitive battery for the diagnosis of dementia in a Spanish population-based sample.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 22 (2006), pp. 454-464
[73]
M. Drake, J. Butman, L. Fontan, J. Lorenzo, P. Harris, R.F. Allegri, et al.
Detección de deterioro cognitivo leve en asistencia primaria. Utilidad del Test de los Siete Minutos.
Actas Esp Psiquiatr, 31 (2003), pp. 252-255
[74]
J.A. Matias-Guiu, R. Fernández de Bobadilla, G. Escudero, J. Pérez-Pérez, A. Cortés, E. Morenas-Rodríguez, et al.
Validación de la versión española del test Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III para el diagnóstico de demencia.
[75]
A. Garcia-Caballero, I. Garcia-Lado, J. Gonzalez-Hermida, M. Recimil, R. Area, F. Manes, et al.
Validation of the Spanish version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination in a rural community in Spain.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 21 (2006), pp. 239-245
[76]
J.A. Matias-Guiu, R. Fernández de Bobadilla.
Validación de la versión española del Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination para el cribado de demencias.
[77]
M.E. Van Eersel, H. Joosten, J. Koerts, R.T. Gansevoort, J.P. Slaets, G.J. Izaks.
Longitudinal study of performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test in persons aged 35 years or older.
PLOS ONE, 10 (2015), pp. e0121411
[78]
R.E. Amariglio, J.A. Becker, J. Carmasin, L.P. Wadsworth, N. Lorius, C. Sullivan, et al.
Subjective cognitive complaints and amyloid burden in cognitively normal older individuals.
Neuropsychologia, 50 (2012), pp. 2880-2886
[79]
F. Bermejo Pareja, J. Castilla Rilo.
Escalas funcionales.
Más de cien escalas en Neurología, pp. 29-46
[80]
J.M. Morales, J.I. Gonzalez-Montalvo, F. Bermejo, T. del-Ser.
The screening of mild dementia with a shortened Spanish version of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 9 (1995), pp. 105-111
[81]
T. Del-Ser, J.M. Morales, M.S. Barquero, R. Canton, F. Bermejo.
Application of a Spanish version of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly in the clinical assessment of dementia.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 11 (1997), pp. 3-8
[82]
M. Forcano-García, F. Perlado-Ortiz de Pinedo.
Deterioro cognitivo: uso de la versión corta del Test del Informador (IQCODE) en consultas de geriatría.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol, 37 (2002), pp. 81-85
[83]
I. Cruz-Orduna, J.M. Bellon, P. Torrero, E. Aparicio, A. Sanz, N. Mula, et al.
Detecting MCI and dementia in primary care: effectiveness of the MMS, the FAQ and the IQCODE [corrected].
Fam Pract, 29 (2012), pp. 401-406
[84]
F. Bermejo-Pareja, D. Antequera, T. Vargas, J.A. Molina, E. Carro.
Saliva levels of Abeta1-42 as potential biomarker of Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study.
BMC Neurol, 10 (2010), pp. 108
[85]
M. Mapstone, A.K. Cheema, M.S. Fiandaca, X. Zhong, T.R. Mhyre, L.H. MacArthur, et al.
Plasma phospholipids identify antecedent memory impairment in older adults.
Nat Med, 20 (2014), pp. 415-418
[86]
C. Carnero-Pardo, L. Montiel Navarro, M. Pérez-Navarro, I. Feria Vilar, P. del Saz, R. Vílchez Carrillo, et al.
Evaluación de la eficacia del uso combinado y escalonado del Fototest y Eurotest en la detección de demencia.
Neurologia, 22 (2007), pp. 652
[87]
D.A. Cahn-Weiner, K. Williams, J. Grace, G. Tremont, H. Westervelt, R.A. Stern.
Discrimination of dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease using the Clock Drawing Test.
Cogn Behav Neurol, 16 (2003), pp. 85-92

Please cite this article as: Olazarán J, Hoyos-Alonso MC, del Ser T, Garrido Barral A, Conde-Sala JL, Bermejo-Pareja F, et al. Aplicación práctica de los test cognitivos breves. Neurología. 2016;31:183–194.

Copyright © 2015. Sociedad Española de Neurología
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

es en pt
Política de cookies Cookies policy Política de cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.