Buscar en
Neurología (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Neurología (English Edition) Catastrophic demyelinating multifocal encephalitis
Journal Information
Vol. 37. Issue 2.
Pages 159-163 (March 2022)
Vol. 37. Issue 2.
Pages 159-163 (March 2022)
Letter to the Editor
Open Access
Catastrophic demyelinating multifocal encephalitis
Encefalitis desmielinizante multifocal catastrófica
Visits
1518
S. Rubio-Guerra
Corresponding author
sararubioguerra@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, A. Massuet-Vilamajó, S. Presas-Rodríguez, C. Ramo-Tello
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Tables (1)
Table 1. Clinical, radiological, laboratory, and anatomical pathology characteristics of the 4 main fulminant demyelinating diseases of the CNS included in the differential diagnosis of our patient.
Full Text
Dear Editor:

We present the case of a 45-year-old man with no relevant medical history who consulted due to one week’s history of progressive encephalopathy and faciobrachicrural hemiparesis. He reported no history of infection, recent vaccination, toxic habits, constitutional symptoms, or any other relevant alterations. A contrast-enhanced brain MRI scan revealed multiple T2-hyperintense nodular lesions in both hemispheres; the lesions involved the corticosubcortical junction, basal ganglia, and brainstem, with no significant perilesional oedema or mass effect. Only one lesion showed contrast uptake. These findings led us to suspect infection or tumour; however, these diagnostic hypotheses were ruled out after comprehensive serology testing and cerebrospinal fluid analysis and a chest and abdomen CT scan, which yielded normal results. An autoimmunity study revealed presence of oligoclonal bands, although the patient tested negative for anti-AQP4 and anti-MOG antibodies. The study also revealed low titres of antinuclear and antithyroid antibodies. Hormone and vitamin profile tests yielded normal results, and a toxicology screening test yielded negative results. An additional brain MRI scan revealed increased lesion extension, associated with mild diffusion restriction and open-ring enhancement, as well as petechial haemorrhages on susceptibility-weighted images (Fig. 1). A contrast-enhanced spinal cord MRI scan detected no alterations. Due to suspicion of an autoimmune inflammatory process of the CNS, we initially prescribed a 5-day course of 1 g intravenous methylprednisolone. However, symptoms progressed in the following weeks; the patient presented impaired consciousness, and was admitted to the intensive care unit. During his stay at the unit, he presented signs suggestive of epilepsy; this was confirmed by an EEG study, which revealed frequent interictal epileptiform discharges in the right frontal lobe. Another contrast-enhanced brain and spinal cord MRI scan did not reveal any significant changes that may explain the clinical worsening. The patient received 5 sessions of plasmapheresis on alternating days, together with an additional course of 1 g intravenous methylprednisolone for 5 days, with no clinical improvement. He was then administered 2 rituximab infusions (body surface area–based dosing), presenting marked clinical and radiological improvement. After 11 months of follow-up, with no immunosuppressant treatment, the patient has presented no relapses or new inflammatory lesions on follow-up brain and spinal cord MRI scans, and his functional status has improved, with partial independence in daily living activities.

Figure 1.

Contrast-enhanced brain MRI (A-B and D-J: axial plane; C: coronal plane). Multiple parenchymal pseudonodular lesions in both hemispheres, hyperintense on FLAIR sequences (A-C), mainly affecting the periventricular and juxtacortical white matter of the right precentral gyrus, the basal ganglia, and the internal capsule, extending caudally to the cerebral peduncles in the midbrain. The lesions are not associated with significant oedema or mass effect. Some present mild open-ring contrast uptake following gadolinium administration (D-E), with mild diffusion restriction (diffusion-weighted imaging: F-G; apparent diffusion coefficient: H-I). Deeper lesions present petechial foci on susceptibility-weighted imaging sequences (J).

(0.32MB).

The radiological characteristics of the lesions and the patient’s clinical progression and response to third-line immunotherapy with rituximab are compatible with fulminant multifocal demyelinating encephalitis.

Fulminant demyelinating diseases of the CNS are a group of extremely rare autoimmune diseases that often lead to the patient’s death due to an uncontrolled immune response and the critical localisation (eg, brainstem) and extension of the lesions; when lesions are larger than 2 cm in diameter, they are described as pseudotumoural due to their clinico-radiological behaviour, which resembles that of brain tumours.1,2 These entities are thought to be closely related to multiple sclerosis; however, we are still unable to identify those patients who, after a first episode of severe demyelination, present greater risk of developing a recurrent form of demyelinating disease of the CNS.1 The available information on these conditions is inconsistent, given their low frequency and the overlap between them.2,3 Only a few have been defined with widely accepted diagnostic criteria, as is the case with fulminant multiple sclerosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.3Table 1 presents the clinical, radiological, laboratory, and anatomical pathology characteristics of the main entities included in the differential diagnosis of our case; the patient presented features of several of these conditions, demonstrating the overlap between them.1–7

Table 1.

Clinical, radiological, laboratory, and anatomical pathology characteristics of the 4 main fulminant demyelinating diseases of the CNS included in the differential diagnosis of our patient.

  Fulminant multiple sclerosisa  Marburg-variant multiple sclerosis  ADEMb  Acute haemorrhagic leukoencephalitis/Weston-Hurst syndrome 
Epidemiology  < 4% of all new cases of MS  Very few cases reported  Incidence: 0.4-0.8 cases/100 000 children per year  Very rare 
  Young adults  Young adults     
  ♀ > ♂       
  Known or new-onset MS       
      Children (< 10 years) >>> adults
      Few series of adult patients reported
      ♀ = ♂
      Winter and spring
Aetiopathogenesis  HLA-DR15  18.5-kDa MBP isoform  Infection or vaccination 1-2 weeks prior: molecular mimetism?
Symptoms  Focal neurological signs causing severe disability or death  Signs of intracranial hypertension 
    Focal neurological signs  Signs of intracranial hypertension
MRI  Lesions:  Lesions:  Lesions:  Lesions: 
  Oval, well-defined borders  Pseudotumoural (> 2 cm)  Variable size (> 1 cm)  Variable size 
  Brain and/or spinal cord (no LETM)  Infiltrative pattern  Ill-defined borders  Multiple lesions 
  White matter > grey matter (no basal ganglia involvement)  Multiple, confluent lesions  Multiple lesions  Haemorrhage 
  Periventricular  White matter (no grey matter involvement)  Brain (supra/infratentorial) and/or spinal cord (LETM)  Perilesional oedema 
  Gadolinium uptake (+/–)  Supratentorial (centrum semiovale) > infratentorial (brainstem), spinal cord  White and grey matter (cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus)  Gd+ 
  Different progression stages; black holes  Perilesional oedema +++, mass effect  Less marked periventricular involvement (this involvement is observed in adults)   
    Gd+  ± Gd+   
  ≥ 2 of the following:  Different progression stages  In the same progression stage;   
  pseudotumoural lesions (> 2 cm)    No black holes on T1-weighted sequences   
  > 10 lesions on T2-weighted sequences       
  > 5 lesions (or ≥ 1 pseudotumoural) with Gd+       
CSF  Pleocytosis (lymphocytes)  Normal or:  Transient pleocytosis (children: lymphocytes; adults: neutrophils)  Erythrocytes +++ 
  > 90% display OCBs permanently  ± pleocytosis  High protein levels  Pleocytosis (neutrophils) 
    ± high protein levels  20% present OCBs transiently (frequently “mirror effect”)  High protein levels 
    ± OCBs (+)     
Serology testing      40% present anti-MOG IgG transiently (children >> adults)   
Anatomical pathology  Diffuse demyelination  More destructive lesions:  Perivenular demyelination   
  Lesions at different progression stages:  Neutrophils ± Ig and complement     
  Acute: macrophages, T cells ± Ig and complement  Myelin and axon destruction     
  Chronic: myelin and axon destruction  Tissue necrosis     
      Lesions at the same progression stage  Haemorrhage 
      Macrophages and lymphocytes; few granulocytes  Neutrophils, lymphocytes 
      White and grey matter: cortical microglial aggregates (proposed as the cause of encephalopathy)  Oedema 
        Perivascular fibrinoid necrosis 
        Myelin and axon destruction 
Natural course  Relapsing  Monophasic  Monophasic (< 5% multiphasic, vs atypical MS?)  Monophasic 
  Death within months/years  Death within weeks/months  80% recover completely within weeks;  70% die within days/weeks 
    (direct brainstem involvement,  without treatment 5%-20% die   
    due to brain herniation secondary to intracranial hypertension)  8.5% diagnosed with MS   

ADEM: acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; IG: immunoglobulin; IgG: immunoglobulin G; LETM: longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis; MBP: myelin basic protein; MOG: myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; MS: multiple sclerosis; OCBs: oligoclonal bands.

a

Clinical-radiological diagnostic criteria proposed by Weinshenker and Rodríguez (2001).7

b

International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group diagnostic criteria (updated in 2013).4

Today, the prognosis of these conditions is less disheartening thanks to the widespread use of MRI, which enables earlier diagnosis, and improvements in immunosuppressive and life support treatments.4 Reporting of all cases of fulminant CNS demyelination will increase our understanding of these entities and improve the care provided to these patients.

References
[1]
X. Ayrignac, C. Carra-Dallière, P. Labauge.
Atypical inflammatory demyelinating lesions and atypical multiple sclerosis.
[2]
T.A. Hardy, S.W. Reddel, M.H. Barnett, J. Palace, C.F. Lucchinetti, B.G. Weinshenker.
Atypical inflammatory demyelinating syndromes of the CNS.
Lancet Neurol, 15 (2016), pp. 967-981
[3]
U.K. Zettl, O. Stüve, R. Patejdl.
Immune-mediated CNS diseases: a review on nosological classification and clinical features.
Autoimmun Rev, 11 (2012), pp. 167-173
[4]
C.J. Bevan, B.A. Cree.
Fulminant demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system.
Semin Neurol, 35 (2015), pp. 656-666
[5]
E. Capello, G.L. Mancardi.
Marburg type and Balò’s concentric sclerosis: rare and acute variants of multiple sclerosis.
Neurol Sci, 25 (2004), pp. 361-363
[6]
D. Pohl, G. Alper, K. Van Haren, A.J. Kornberg, C.F. Lucchinetti, S. Tenembaum, et al.
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Updates on an inflammatory CNS syndrome.
Neurology, 87 (2016), pp. S38-S45
[7]
J.M. García Domínguez, J. Guzmán de Villoria Lebiedziejewski.
Catástrofes neurológicas por enfermedades desmielinizantes.
Neurología, 25 (2010), pp. 30-33

Please cite this article as: Rubio-Guerra S, Massuet-Vilamajó A, Presas-Rodríguez S, Ramo-Tello C. Encefalitis desmielinizante multifocal catastrófica. Neurología. 2022;37:159–163.

Copyright © 2021. Sociedad Española de Neurología
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.nrleng.2021.10.005
No mostrar más