Buscar en
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española (English Edition) Bullfighting surgery in the XXI century
Journal Information
Vol. 100. Issue 8.
Pages 527-528 (August 2022)
Vol. 100. Issue 8.
Pages 527-528 (August 2022)
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Bullfighting surgery in the XXI century
Cirugía taurina en el siglo XXI
Visits
189
Francisco López-Soriano
Corresponding author
francisco.lopez1818@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Javier Belmonte
Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

With regard to the article by Dr. Ríos1 in which he rightly reflects on the problems of bullfighting surgery, we would like to add other topics for concern that should be considered.

If this surgery is "always urgent" and "with a high volume of activity", and the primary objective pursued is to "save life" in situ, it is easy to understand that poor outcomes2 are invariably the result, given the lack of experience and equipment.

The quality of care that is required must encompass the clinical safety it needs, although promotion of research in this particular scenario is lacking: it is necessary to measure in order to visualize. As drugs are studied, so too must we be aware of the efficacy and safety of the "bullring infirmaries", which are so unequal in infrastructures for dealing with the same task, and indeed we consider them the Achilles' heel of bullfighting.

Quality of care is based on cycles of continuous improvement underpinned by three basic pillars: 1) structure: resources needed to meet material, human, financial and organisational objectives; 2) process: a series of interrelated tasks that together achieve the objectives; and 3) outcome: any change in health attributable to the process, and changes need to be measured by indicators based on scientific evidence3.

The current Bullfighting Regulations lack guarantees when they state that for bullfighting events that are not first or second class, "an anaesthesiologist is not required", ignoring the high incidence of injuries in the rest (third class bullrings and popular festivals), regardless of the seriousness of the injuries4.

Finally, we would like to leave a few questions unanswered because they are ambiguous: How is the inspection and enforcement function exercised? Which scientific societies have been involved in advising the responsible organisers? Who is responsible for the maintenance of the anaesthesia equipment? What are the quality and safety standards for performance and who monitors them?

There are many gaps to be filled and we must not look the other way. If we want to survive, we must get down to work.

References
[1]
A. Ríos.
Cirugía Taurina en el siglo XXI. De la gloria al desprecio.
[2]
J. Gérvas, M. Pérez-Fernández.
Cuando ya no puedes más: estructura, proceso y resultado.
Acta Sanitaria, (2020),
[3]
J. Saturno, J.J. Gascón, P. Parra.
Tratado de calidad asistencial en atención primaria. Tomo I.
Du Pont Pharma, (1997),
[4]
Real Decreto 1649/1997 por el que se regulan las instalaciones sanitarias y los servicios médico-quirúrgicos en los espectáculos taurinos [accessed 1 Nov 2021]. Available from: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/1997/10/31/1649.

Please cite this article as: López-Soriano F, Belmonte J. Cirugía taurina en el siglo XXI. Cir Esp. 2022;100:527–528.

Copyright © 2021. AEC
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos