Regístrese
Buscar en
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad New records of the Californian lancelet Branchiostoma californiense (Cephalochor...
Información de la revista
Vol. 88. Núm. 4.
Páginas 995-998 (Diciembre 2017)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 88. Núm. 4.
Páginas 995-998 (Diciembre 2017)
Research note
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmb.2017.10.032
Open Access
New records of the Californian lancelet Branchiostoma californiense (Cephalochordata: Branchiostomidae) from the Pacific coast of Mexico
Nuevos registros de la lanceta de California Branchiostoma californiense (Cephalochordata: Branchiostomidae) de la costa pacífica de México
Visitas
741
Cristian Moisés Galván-Villa
Autor para correspondencia
cmgv1982@yahoo.com.mx

Corresponding author.
, Eduardo Ríos-Jara, Manuel Ayón-Parente
Laboratorio de Ecosistemas Marinos y Acuicultura, Departamento de Ecología, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Camino Ing. Ramón Padilla Sánchez #2100, Predio Las Agujas, 45110 Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
Este artículo ha recibido
741
Visitas

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Tablas (1)
Table 1. Morphometric comparison between Branchiostoma californiense specimens from previous reports and those specimens caught in Isla Melendres and Bahía Chamela, Mexico. Parentheses indicate average.
Abstract

A number of specimens of the Californian lancelet, Branchiostoma californiense Andrews, 1893 were found in Isla Melendres, Sinaloa and Bahía Chamela, Jalisco, in the Mexican Pacific. The specimens were collected with a biological dredge on sandy bottoms. Some morphometric and meristic characters of the collected specimens are described and discussed herein. This is the first record of the species for the Bahía Chamela in the central Mexican Pacific and second for the Sinaloa state in the Gulf of California, confirming their distribution along the Eastern Pacific from the coast of California coast, USA to Panama. However, an extensive area of the southern Mexican Pacific (∼1,500km from Colima to Chiapas) have scarce records of this species, this possibly due to the lack of sampling effort on this group in the area.

Keywords:
Amphioxus
New records
Distribution
Central Mexican Pacific
Resumen

Algunos especímenes de la lanceta de California Branchiostoma californiense Andrews, 1893 fueron encontrados en la isla Melendres (Sinaloa) y en la bahía Chamela (Jalisco), en el Pacífico mexicano. Los ejemplares fueron recolectados con una draga biológica en fondos arenosos. Algunos caracteres morfométricos y merísticos de los especímenes encontrados son descritos y discutidos en este trabajo. Este es el primer registro de la especie para la bahía Chamela en el Pacífico central mexicano y el segundo para el estado de Sinaloa, dentro del golfo de California, lo que permite confirmar su distribución a lo largo del Pacífico oriental desde la costa de California (EUA) hasta Panamá. Sin embargo, en una extensa área del sur del Pacífico mexicano (∼1,500km desde Colima hasta Chiapas) se encuentran escasos registros de esta especie, posiblemente por la falta de esfuerzo de muestreo sobre este grupo en esta área.

Palabras clave:
Anfioxos
Nuevos registros
Distribución
Pacífico central mexicano
Texto completo

The lancelets or amphioxi are small chordates with a cosmopolitan distribution, inhabiting shallow marine and brackish waters, mainly associated with coarse sediments such as sand, gravel, or shell material (Da Silva, Tavares, & Soares-Gomes, 2008; Richardson & McKenzie, 1994). Currently, lancelets are important for phylogenetic studies of vertebrates due to its phylogenetic proximity with the vertebrate clade (García-Fernández & Benito-Gutiérrez, 2009; Gee, 2006; Vargas & Dean, 2010). The chordate family Branchiostomidae is composed of 2 valid genera: Branchiostoma and Epigonichthys. The genus Branchiostoma is the most diverse, with 23 valid species, 2 of them (Branchiostoma californiense Andrews, 1893 and Branchiostoma elongatum Sundevall, 1853) distributed throughout the Tropical Eastern Pacific (Del Moral-Flores, Guadarrama-Martínez, & Flores-Coto, 2016; Poss & Boschung, 1996). According to Gill (1895), the species in this genus are characterized by bearing bilateral gonads, a rayed sympodium, low dorsal fin, and sagittiform expansion of the caudal fin membranes.

B. californiense has been previously recorded in the California coast, USA, the Gulf of California, Jalisco, and Oaxaca, Mexico (Beebe & Tee-Van, 1941; Del Moral-Flores et al., 2016; Hubbs, 1922; Poss & Boschung, 1996), Corinto harbor, Nicaragua (Poss & Boschung, 1996), the Gulf of Nicoya, Costa Rica (Vargas & Dean, 2010), and Chame Point in Panama (Meek & Hildebrand, 1923); the other species B. elongatum has been reported from Chile, Peru, and the Galapagos islands (Poss & Boschung, 1996; Snodgrass & Heller, 1905; Vergara, Oliva, & Riascos, 2012). Studies of lancelet communities in the Mexican Pacific region are limited. As part of a study on the diversity of the marine fauna of the Sanctuary of Bahía Chamela and the coast of Sinaloa, some specimens identified as B. californiense were collected and these represent records from the southeast area of the Gulf of California and the central Mexican Pacific.

Four specimens of B. californiense were collected from the sandy bottom of Bahía Chamela, Jalisco, in the central Mexican Pacific and 1 more from Isla Melendres, Sinaloa, in the southeast Gulf of California. The specimens from Bahía Chamela were collected in October 2013 from the shallow subtidal zone (5–8m deep) in 3 different sites and the specimen from Isla Melendres was collected in August 2015. Sediment samples were taken with a rectangular biological dredge (26×44cm, mesh size=2.5cm, and cod-end mesh size=1.3cm) conducted on lineal trawling for 5min. All specimens were fixed in 5% formalin, later preserved in 70% ethanol and subsequently deposited in the invertebrate collection of the Laboratory of Marine Ecosystems and Aquaculture (LEMA, for its acronym in Spanish), Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara (Zapopan, Mexico). Identification of specimens was based on the descriptions given by Hubbs (1922) and Kirkaldy (1895).

Phylum Chordata Haeckel, 1874

Subphylum Cephalochordata Owen, 1846

Class Leptocardii Müller, 1845

Order Amphioxiformes Anonymous

Family Branchiostomatidae Bonaparte, 1846

Genus Branchiostoma Costa, 1834

B. californiense Andrews, 1893 (Fig. 1)

Figure 1.

Lateral view of the external features of Branchiostoma californiense (LEMA-CCC2) from Bahía Chamela. (A) Head region; (B) trunk region; (C) tail region.

(0,17MB).

Material examined. LEMA-CCC1 (1, 25.2mm TL (total length)), 19°32′04″ N 105°05′05″ W, 7m, Bahía Chamela, Jalisco, Mexico, 10 October 2013. LEMA-CCC2 (1, 28.1mm TL), 19°33′20″ N 105°06′22″ W, 8m, Bahía Chamela, Jalisco, Mexico, 10 October 2013. LEMA-CCC3 (2, 24.1–26.1mm TL), 19°33′23″ N 105°06′20″ W, 5m, Bahía Chamela, Jalisco, Mexico, 12 October 2013. LEMA-CCC4 (1, 40.1mm TL), 24°57′16″ N 108°03′5″ W, 1m, Isla Melendres, Sinaloa, Mexico, 6 August 2015.

Description. Body elongate. Ratio of body length to body depth 11.7 (10.4–13.2). Ratio of preatriopore length to postatriopore length 2.42 (2.2–2.6). Notochord extends forward of the oral hood and forms a well-developed rostral process. Buccal region with numerous fine cirri (up to 40), some of them longer than the tip of the rostrum. Rostral fin thickened and round termination. Myotome formula: preatriopore 43 (39–46)+atriopore-anal 17 (16–19)+postanal 9 (9–10)=total 69 (66–72). Dorsal fin of moderate height. Dorsal fin-chambers 364 (343–395). Preanal fin-chambers 58 (56–61). Ratio of body length to body depth 12.06 (10.4–13.36). Caudal fin with expansions of dorsal and ventral fins long and shallow. Anus located far behind middle of lower lobe of caudal fin. Color of body white and fins translucent.

Distribution. Coast of California, USA to Chame Point, Panama (Poss & Boschung, 1996).

Although B. californiense is widely distributed and abundant along the tropical eastern Pacific (Fig. 2). The lack of information is due to the difficulty of collecting them because they have small size and live buried in sandy bottoms. This is the second record of lancelets for the coast of Jalisco in the central Mexican Pacific, previous record was collected in 1935 in Bahía Tenacatita (LACM-22314); since then it had not been reported again. A previous record in Sinaloa corresponds to 1 specimen collected in Bahía Mazatlán, near to the Isla Venados (Poss & Boschung, 1996), approximately 250km south of Isla Melendres (where the specimen of this work was found). Records of B. californiense are concentrated in 3 regions: southern California (USA), Gulf of California (Mexico), and Central America (from Nicaragua to Panama) with a great gap without records between the last 2 regions. Possibly the absence of records between the Gulf of California and Nicaragua is due to the lack of sampling effort on this group in this large area of over 2,800km of coastline (Bastida-Zavala et al., 2013; Del Moral-Flores et al., 2016; Fuentes-Farías, Villaroel-Melo, & Solís-Marín, 2005).

Figure 2.

Map displaying records of Branchiostoma californiense based on previously known material (black circles) and the present study material (black triangles).

(0,13MB).

Poss and Boschung (1996) recognized great morphometric variation among specimens of B. californiense but without a well-defined geographic pattern. As expected, specimens from Bahía Chamela and Isla Melendres are similar to specimens of the Gulf of California (Mexico) and Central America (Nicaragua to Panama) but show some differences from the records from California (USA). The most remarkable difference between specimens from the Gulf of California and those recorded in Bahía Chamela is in the number of preatriopore myotomes (42–47 and 39–46, respectively) (Table 1). There is also a tendency to increase the number of dorsal and preanal fin-chambers from the northern to the southern specimens recorded in Mexico. Hubbs (1922) measured less preanal fin-chambers (50 vs. 58) and presented lengths of mature specimens from 5.8 to 8.35cm and immature specimens from 3.75 to 5.6cm, whereas we found a mature individual of 2.61cm. According to Hubbs, specimens from San Luis Gonzaga Bay, Gulf of California (collected by the Albatross), are not fully typical in the form of tail and fins, but differences may be due to the poor preservation of the gulf specimens. On the other hand, Kirkaldy (1895) reported 7.4cm as the maximum size but did not report the minimum of specimens collected in California, USA. Specimens from Bahía Chamela are comparatively smaller than previous records from the California coast (Hubbs, 1922) but are of similar size (5–37mm) to those collected in Costa Rica (Vargas & Dean, 2010). In this case, Vargas and Dean (2010) reported that smaller individuals probably represent recruits for this species. However, specimens of Bahía Chamela are mature individuals and the lower number of gonad pouches compared to previous reports is likely due to their smaller size. More sampling effort should be performed in the southern Pacific coast of Mexico (between Colima and Chiapas) and in Central America (from Guatemala to El Salvador) to confirm if there is a continuous distribution of the Californian lancelet and to evaluate morphometric differences among populations. Besides, a phylogenetic study of these populations is also necessary to determine if they belong to only 1 species or are a complex of species such as was recently recorded for Asymmetron lucayanum (Kon, Nohara, Nishida, Sterrer, & Nishikawa, 2006; Kon et al., 2007).

Table 1.

Morphometric comparison between Branchiostoma californiense specimens from previous reports and those specimens caught in Isla Melendres and Bahía Chamela, Mexico. Parentheses indicate average.

  Kirkaldy (1895)  Hubbs (1922)  Poss and Boschung (1996)  Del Moral-Flores et al. (2016)  Present work 
Total length (cm)  7.4 max.  3.75–8.35  No data  8.35mm  2.41–4.01 
Dorsal fin-chambers  No data  312–374 (337)  317–419 (355)  317–419 (355)  343–395 (364) 
Preanal fin-chambers  No data  50  35–59 (44)  35–59 (44)  56–61 (58) 
Relative length of preatrioporal region to postatrioporal region  No data  2.65–3.3  No data  No data  2.2–2.6 (2.42) 
Total myotomes  69–73 (71)  68–74  64–78 (70.1)  64–71 (67)  66–72 (69) 
Preatriopore myotomes  44–45  43–48  42–47 (44.3)  40–45 (40)  39–46 (43) 
Myotomes between atriopore and anus  16–19  16–19  13–19 (16.7)  14–19 (18)  16–19 (17) 
Postanal myotomes  8–9  8–10  7–11 (9.1)  8–9 (9)  9–10 (9) 
Gonad pouches  31  27–36 (33)  36 max.  36 max.  18–31 (26) 
N  10  22  57  No data 

Thanks to Cristina Zuñiga, Valentina Fernández, Thalía González, Diego Moreno, Abel Trejo, and Cande Hernández for their help during sampling work. To Jorge Vega and all the personnel in the Biological Station of Chamela for access to the facilities. We are grateful to Adriana Reyes for taking pictures and to Stefanie Kaiser for comments on the final version of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (Conabio) (grant number JF023) and the University of Guadalajara (grant number P3E2014).

References
[Bastida-Zavala et al., 2013]
J.R. Bastida-Zavala, M.S. García-Madrigal, E.F. Rosas-Alquicira, R.A. López-Pérez, F. Benítez-Villalobos, J.F. Meraz-Hernando, et al.
Marine and coastal biodiversity of Oaxaca, Mexico.
Check List, 9 (2013), pp. 329-390
[Beebe and Tee-Van, 1941]
W. Beebe, J. Tee-Van.
Eastern Pacific expeditions of the New York Zoological Society. XXIV. Fishes from the tropical eastern Pacific (from Cedros Island, Baja California Sur to the Galápagos Islands and northern Peru). Part 1. Lancelets and Hagfishes.
Zoologica N.Y., 26 (1941), pp. 89-91
[Da Silva et al., 2008]
L.F.B. Da Silva, M. Tavares, A. Soares-Gomes.
Population structure of the lancelet Branchiosotma caribaeum (Cephalochordata: Branchiostomidae) in the Bahía de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil.
Revista Brasileira de Zoología, 25 (2008), pp. 617-623
[Del Moral-Flores et al., 2016]
L.F. Del Moral-Flores, M.Á. Guadarrama-Martínez, C. Flores-Coto.
Composición taxonómica y distribución de los cefalocordados (Cephalochordata: Amphioxiformes) en México.
Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, 44 (2016), pp. 497-503
[Fuentes-Farías et al., 2005]
A.L. Fuentes-Farías, M.D. Villaroel-Melo, F.A. Solís-Marín.
Los invertebrados marinos.
La biodiversidad en Michoacán: estudio de estado, pp. 85-87
[García-Fernández and Benito-Gutiérrez, 2009]
J. García-Fernández, E. Benito-Gutiérrez.
It's a long way from amphioxus: descendants of the earliest chordate.
BioEssays, 31 (2009), pp. 665-675
[Gee, 2006]
H. Gee.
Careful with that amphioxus.
Nature, 439 (2006), pp. 923-924
[Gill, 1895]
T. Gill.
The genera of Branchiostomidae.
The American Naturalist, 29 (1895), pp. 457-459
[Hubbs, 1922]
C.L. Hubbs.
A list of the lancelets of the world with diagnoses of five new species of Branchiostoma.
Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan, 105 (1922), pp. 1-15
[Kirkaldy, 1895]
J.W. Kirkaldy.
A revision of the genera and species of the Branchiostomidae.
Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 37 (1895), pp. 303-323
[Kon et al., 2006]
T. Kon, M. Nohara, M. Nishida, W. Sterrer, T. Nishikawa.
Hidden ancient diversification in the circumtropical lancelet Asymmetron lucayanum complex.
Marine Biology, 149 (2006), pp. 875-883
[Kon et al., 2007]
T. Kon, M. Nohara, Y. Yamanoue, Y. Fujiwara, M. Nishida, T. Nishikawa.
Phylogenetic position of a whale-fall lancelet (Cephalochordata) inferred from whole mitocondrial genome sequences.
BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7 (2007), pp. 1-127
[Meek and Hildebrandt, 1923]
S.E. Meek, S.F. Hildebrandt.
Marine fishes of Panama. Part 1.
Field Museum of Natural History, Publs 215, Zoology Series, 15 (1923), pp. 1-330
[Poss and Boschung, 1996]
S.G. Poss, H.T. Boschung.
Lancelets (Cephalochordata: Branchiostomatidae): how many species are valid?.
Israel Journal of Zoology, 42 (1996), pp. S13-S66
[Richardson and McKenzie, 1994]
B.J. Richardson, A.M. McKenzie.
Taxonomy and distribution of Australian cephalochordates (Chordata: Cephalochordata).
Invertebrate Systematics, 8 (1994), pp. 1443-1459
[Snodgrass and Heller, 1905]
R.E. Snodgrass, E. Heller.
Shore fishes of the Revillagigedo, Clipperton, Cocos and Galápagos Islands.
Proceedings of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 6 (1905), pp. 333-427
[Vargas and Dean, 2010]
J.A. Vargas, H.K. Dean.
On Branchiostoma californiense (Cephalochordata) from the Gulf of Nicoya estuary, Costa Rica.
Revista de Biología Tropical, 58 (2010), pp. 1143-1148
[Vergara et al., 2012]
M. Vergara, M.E. Oliva, J.M. Riascos.
Population dynamics of the amphioxus Branchiostoma elongatum from northern Chile.
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 92 (2012), pp. 591-599

Peer Review under the responsibility of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en pt
Política de cookies Cookies policy Política de cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.