Buscar en
Revista Iberoamericana de Micología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Iberoamericana de Micología Fungal ovicidal activity on Toxocara canis eggs
Información de la revista
Vol. 30. Núm. 4.
Páginas 226-230 (Octubre - Diciembre 2013)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
4589
Vol. 30. Núm. 4.
Páginas 226-230 (Octubre - Diciembre 2013)
Original article
Acceso a texto completo
Fungal ovicidal activity on Toxocara canis eggs
Actividad ovicida fúngica sobre huevos de Toxocara canis
Visitas
...
Fernando De Souza Maia Filhoa,??
Autor para correspondencia
fmaia2404@yahoo.com.br

Corresponding author.
, Juliana Nunes Vieiraa, Maria Elisabeth Aires Bernea, Franciele Elisa Stollb, Patricia Da Silva Nascentea, Luciana Pötterc, Daniela Isabel Brayer Pereiraa
a Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Programa de Pós Graduação em Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
b Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Laboratório de Micologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
c Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (1)
Tablas (2)
Table 1. Percentages and standard deviation of ovicide activity of the fungi Acremonium, Fusarium solani complex, Trichoderma and control group, on Toxocara canis eggs at 7, 14 and 21 days of fungus–egg interaction.
Table 2. Regression equations of the effects of the fungi Trichoderma spp., Fusarium solani complex and Acremonium spp. on Toxocara canis eggs.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract
Background

Visceral toxocariasis is a parasitic zoonosis caused by Toxocara canis. The prevalence of this parasite in dogs, soil contamination and the resistance of eggs increase human exposure to the disease. Moreover, the difficulties of the control measures justify the need for alternative ones.

Aims

The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro ovicidal activity of fungi isolated from soils from public places in the city of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, on Toxocara canis.

Methods

Samples of soil from ten localities were inoculated onto Petri dishes with 2% water–agar (WA) that contained antibiotics, and incubated at 25°C/21 days. Isolated fungi were tested in vitro for ovicidal activity, with five replicates. One mL of an embryonated Toxocara canis egg suspension (103 eggs) was poured over the fungal cultures after 10 days of growth. At intervals of 7, 14 and 21 days, 100 eggs were removed from each plaque and evaluated by optical microscopy.

Results

Acremonium, Aspergillus, Bipolaris, Fusarium, Gliocladium, Mucor and Trichoderma were isolated from the soil. A significant ovicidal type 3 effect was observed in Trichoderma, Fusarium solani complex and Acremonium. Those isolates from the genus Trichoderma showed their ovicidal effect on the 14th day of fungus–egg interaction. The other fungal genera tested showed a type 2 effect.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the use of Trichoderma and Fusarium solani complex in biological control of T. canis is promising; however, further studies should be performed.

Keywords:
Toxocariasis
Nematodes
Soil
Biological control
Trichoderma spp.
Resumen
Antecedentes

La toxocariasis visceral es una zoonosis parasitaria causada por Toxocara canis. La prevalencia del parásito en perros, la contaminación del suelo y la resistencia de los huevos aumentan la exposición del ser humano a la infección. Además, las dificultades de las medidas de control justifican la búsqueda de otras alternativas.

Objetivos

El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la actividad ovicida in vitro frente a T. canis de hongos aislados del suelo de lugares públicos en la ciudad de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.

Métodos

Las muestras de suelo de 10 lugares diferentes se inocularon en placas de Petri con un 2% de agar/agua que contenía antibióticos y se incubaron a 25 ??C durante 21 días. Se evaluó la actividad ovicida in vitro de los hongos aislados por quintuplicado. Después de 10 días de crecimiento, se vertió 1ml (103 huevos) de una suspensión de huevos embrionarios de T. canis en los cultivos de hongos. A intervalos de 7, 14 y 21 días, se retiraron 100 huevos de cada placa y se evaluaron mediante microscopia óptica.

Resultados

Del suelo se aislaron especies de los géneros Acremonium, Aspergillus, Bipolaris, Fusarium, Gliocladium, Mucor y Trichoderma. Se observó un efecto ovicida significativo de tipo 3 en Trichoderma, el complejo de Fusarium solani y Acremonium. En hongos del grupo Trichoderma se evidenció un efecto ovicida el día 14 de la interacción hongo-huevo. Los otros géneros de hongos examinados mostraron un efecto de tipo 2.

Conclusiones

Los resultados del presente estudio sugieren un uso prometedor de Trichoderma y Fusarium solani para el control biológico de T. canis, pero deben realizarse estudios adicionales.

Palabras clave:
Toxocariasis
Nematodos
Suelo
Control biológico
Trichoderma spp.
Texto completo

Visceral toxocariasis, also called the syndrome of visceral larva migrans (VLM), is a parasitic zoonosis, and it is the result of the migration and persistence of helminthic larva in uncommon hosts.3 Several species of helminthes can cause VLM; however, Toxocara canis is the nematode most frequently associated with the disease.10 The high prevalence of this parasite in dogs, the observed frequent contamination of the environment, and the resistance of the parasite's eggs in the soil all increase human exposure to toxocariasis and make this disease a public health problem throughout the world.28 The prevalence data regarding child toxocariasis from some countries demonstrate quite variable rates of infection.14,31,37 In Brazil, studies have reported a prevalence that varies from 8.7% to 54.8%. 5,17,33 Studies evaluating contamination by the intestinal parasites of dogs in different Brazilian cities have shown that these animals are contaminated by various species of parasites with zoonotic potential.22,23

The difficulties inherent in implementing control measures, the high resistance of the eggs in the environment, and the problems inherent in chemical control justify the need for alternative measures that would help to decontaminate the soil.2 Nematophagous fungi are natural enemies of nematodes. They possess activities directed to the parasitism of the eggs and larvae of the geohelminthes living outside of hosts and are increasingly popular candidates reducing the level of environmental contamination.4 These fungi live in the organic matter of the soil, where they develop a parasitic or predator relationship with the nematodes and are classified as toxic, opportunistic (ovicidal), endoparasites and predators.26 Those fungi parasiting eggs do not depend on the presence of nematodes in the soil for their survival. Due to this characteristic feature, they establish themselves more easily than predator fungi.16 Their ovicidal activity is characterized by the penetration of haustorial hyphae into the egg shell through the pores of the vitelline layer; this alters the permeability of the shell and the expansion of its volume.28 Among these fungi, Pochonia chlamydosporia and Paecilomyces lilacinus stand out and are extensively studied with regard to their ovicidal activity on T. canis.1,6,18

The aim of this study is to investigate and evaluate the ovicidal activity of fungi isolated from soil in southern Brazil on T. canis eggs.

Materials and methodsCollection of soil samples

Soil was collected from public areas in the municipality of Pelotas, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The municipality is located at latitude 31°46′19″S and longitude 52°20′33″W. It is seven meters above sea level, and has a damp, subtropical climate with an annual average temperature of 17.5°C, 1379mm of rain per year, and an average relative humidity of 80%.21 The areas selected for the soil collection (10 localities; 3 equidistant places per locality) were chosen based on previous works that had been performed in the region and had shown soil contamination with Toxocara eggs.19,38 Samples of approximately 500g of soil were obtained at a depth of 10cm. The dead leaves and other residual organic matter of the top layer were ignored. After the collection, the samples were packed in plastic bags, identified, and immediately transported to the Mycology Laboratory of the Biology Institute/Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel) for processing.

Collection of T. canis eggs

The eggs were obtained directly from the uterine tubes of adult females and were washed 10 times with distilled sterile water and centrifuged at 1000rpm for 5min. Next, they were incubated at 25°C for 14 days in a solution containing formalin at 0.05%, streptomycin sulfate at 0.05%, and chloramphenicol at 0.01%. The embryonated eggs had been previously analyzed morphologically to verify their integrity.

Isolation of the fungi from the soil

The technique for the isolation of fungi was based on that of Duddington 12 and adapted for the research on fungi with ovicidal activity described by Gortari et al.20 The 2% water/agar (WA), which contained added streptomycin 5mg/1L and chloramphenicol 5mg/1L, was inoculated at the surface with a 1ml suspension of T. canis eggs (approximately 103 eggs) and immediately seeded with 0.5g of the soil, previously homogenized, in the form of a cross. The Petri dishes were incubated at 25°C and observed daily for 21 days. The identification of the fungi was based on macro- and micro-morphological characteristics9,11 and determined to the lowest possible taxonomic level.

In vitro activity of the fungal isolates

The Petri dishes of isolates that contained Potato dextrose agar (PDA) were selected and incubated at 25°C for 10 days. From these cultures, 4mm disks were transferred to Petri dishes containing 2% WA. All the dishes were incubated at 25°C for 10 days. A 1mL suspension of embryonated T. canis eggs (103/mL) was poured over each of the fungal cultures, as well as over the surface of Petri dishes containing only 2% WA (without fungus) as a control. Five replicates were performed for each fungal isolate analyzed. At intervals of 7, 14 and 21 days, 100 eggs were removed from each dish, according to the technique described by Araújo et al.,1 colored with Aman-blue at 1% and evaluated in microscopy of light (object lense 40×), according to the parameters established by Lysek24: effect type 1, physiological, biochemical effect, without morphological damage to the egg shell, on which hyphae can be observed adhered to the shell; effect type 2, lithic effect with alterations in the morphology of the shell and embryo of the egg, without penetration of the hyphae through the shell; effect type 3, lithic effect, with morphological alteration of the shell and the embryo, as well as penetration of the hyphae and internal colonization of the egg.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained were submitted to the non-parametric Friedman test with a significance level of 1%. The fungi that differ their effects by Friedman test also underwent regression analysis up to the second order regarding the dates of assessment. In regression analysis, the choice model was based on the significance of linear and quadratic coefficient by using the Student test at 5% probability. The analyses were performed using the SAS software package.32

Results

Isolates from the genera Aspergillus, Acremonium, Bipolaris, Fusarium oxysporum complex, Fusarium solani complex, Gliocladium, Mucor and Trichoderma were recovered from the soil. All the fungal isolates showed some degree of fungus–egg interaction. However, the isolates of Acremonium, Fusarium solani complex and Trichoderma presented a significant ovicidal effect type 3 on the embryonated T. canis eggs when submitted to the non-parametric Friedman test. The average results for the type 1, 2, and 3 effects at 7, 14, and 21 days for the groups treated with the fungi Acremonium, Fusarium solani complex, and Trichoderma and the control group are detailed in Table 1. In the control group, no fungal growth was detected. The ovicidal activity of the Trichoderma isolate was observed on the 14th day of interaction (Fig. 1). With the Acremonium and Fusarium solani complex isolates, the same effect was observed on the 21st day.

Table 1.

Percentages and standard deviation of ovicide activity of the fungi Acremonium, Fusarium solani complex, Trichoderma and control group, on Toxocara canis eggs at 7, 14 and 21 days of fungus–egg interaction.

  Effect 1 (%)a  Effect 2 (%)b  Effect 3 (%)c 
Effects at 7 days
Acremonium  27.4A±3.3  0A±0A±
Fusarium solani complex  52.0B±3.8  0A±0A±
Trichoderma  64.0C±2.6  10.6B±5.9  0.2A±0.4 
Control  0D±0A±0A±
Effects at 14 days
Acremonium  49.0A±1.6  4.8A±2.7  0A±
Fusarium solani complex  59.6B±1.5  7.0A±2.0  0A±
Trichoderma  35.2C±3.9  41.2B±6.4  3.4B±1.1 
Control  0D±0C±0A±
Acremonium  51.6A±3.7  30.2A±3.0  1.8A±0.8 
Fusarium solani complex  49.0A±4.3  26.0A±3.5  4.6B±1.1 
Trichoderma  30.8B±3.6  53.4B±5.1  7.8C±1.3 
Control  0C±0C±0D±

Percentage followed by a different capital letter in the column statistically differs (p<0.01) by the Friedman test.

a

Effect type 1, physiological, biochemical effect, without morphological damage to the egg shell, on which hyphae can be observed adhered to the shell.

b

Effect type 2, lithic effect with alterations in the morphology of the shell and embryo of the egg, without penetration of the hyphae through the shell.

c

Effect type 3, lithic effect, with morphological alteration of the shell and the embryo, as well as penetration of the hyphae and internal colonization of the egg.

Fig. 1.

Effect type 3 of the insulator Trichoderma spp. on Toxocara canis eggs on the 14th day of interaction. The image shows the adherence of conidia and penetration of hyphae in the cuticle with the destruction of the egg. Optical microscopy (object lense 40×).

(0,14MB).

The regression analysis showed variations in effects 1, 2 and 3 for each fungal strain evaluated in connection to the time of exposure of T. canis eggs to the fungi (Table 2). The analysis revealed that independently of the fungus, type 2 and 3 effects presented increasing linear response. In Trichoderma it was observed that type 1 effect decreased linearly (2.371 every day). When evaluated type 2 and 3 effects, it was verified that, although both had evidenced increasing linear response, they differ (p<0.0001): an increase of 3.057 and 0.543 every day, respectively, was observed. The type 1 effect of Fusarium complex solani presented a quadratic response with the highest value on the 13th day after the initiation of treatment. Yet the type 2 effects showed increase of linear response with increase of 1.857 every day, as well as type 3 effect which increased 0.32 every day. Finally, the type 1 and 2 effect of Acremonium spp. demonstrated increasing linear response and similar, increasing 1.729 and 2.157 each day, respectively (p>0.05). Nevertheless, the type 3 effect showed different response (p>0.05) with an increase of 0.129 every day.

Table 2.

Regression equations of the effects of the fungi Trichoderma spp., Fusarium solani complex and Acremonium spp. on Toxocara canis eggs.

Fungal isolate    R2 (%)  p 
Trichoderma  E1 Ŷ=76.5332371x  79.49  <0.0001 
  E2 Ŷ=−7733+3057x  86.88  <0.0001 
  E3 Ŷ=−3.80+0.543x  91.16  <0.0001 
  NE Ŷ=351.229x  79.49  <0.0001 
Fusarium solani complex  E1 Ŷ=26.200+4.986x0.186x2  67.89  0.0004 
  E2 Ŷ=−15.00+1.857x  90.08  <0.0001 
  E3 Ŷ=−3.067+0.329x  69.85  <0.0001 
  NE Ŷ=61.5331.971x  93.04  <0.0001 
Acremonium  E1 Ŷ=18.467+1.729x  78.15  <0.0001 
  E2 Ŷ=−18.533+2.157x  84.47  <0.0001 
  E3 Ŷ=−1.20+0.129x  59.56  0.0008 
  NE Ŷ=101.2674.014x  98.47  <0.0001 

E1, effect type 1; E2, effect type 2; E3, effect type 3; NE, no effect

Although the remaining evaluated fungi did not show a significant type 3 effect, a type 2 effect was observed on the 21st day in the Aspergillus (55.2%), Bipolaris (52.4%), Fusarium complex oxysporum (46.8%), Mucor (42.0%) and Gliocladium (39.2%) isolates.

Discussion

This study is the first that researches parasitic fungi for reduction of T. canis eggs in the soil of the southern region of Brazil. Isolates from Trichoderma, Fusarium solani complex and Acremonium were notable for their promising ovicidal activities. According to Lysek,24 a fungus with ovicidal potential is one that demonstrates a large lithic effect, causing morphological alteration of the shell and embryo with penetration of hyphae and internal colonization of the egg (type 3 effect). Among the fungi evaluated, Trichoderma spp. stood out, as it presented a significant type 3 effect at the 14th day of fungus–egg interaction. This result is relevant because Overgaauw29 reported that T. canis eggs become infectious after approximately 2–6 weeks. Hence, this fungus could render the eggs inactive and thus reduce the level of environmental contamination. Several studies have evaluated the ovicidal action of different fungi on T. canis eggs. 1,7,8,18,20 Only Ciarmela et al.8 evaluated the activity of Trichoderma harzianum. This genus has been extensively researched in the biological control of numerous phytopathogenic fungi15,25,30 and in the control of phytonematodes. 16,35,36 Surveys have shown that Trichoderma spp. have the capacity for parasiting the eggs of different nematode species from the species Meloidogyne exigua,16Meloidogyne incognita,13,34Meloidogyne arenaria39 and Meloidogyne javanica.35,36 Mechanisms that have been suggested to explain the activity of Trichoderma against phytopathogenic fungi include antibiosis, competition, micro-paratisism and production of enzymes (chitinases, glucanases and proteases). All of these mechanisms, with the exception of competition, could potentially be involved in the process of biological nematode control.35 Santin,34 when assessing the potential of Trichoderma on M. incognita control, suggested that the mechanisms used by the fungus consist of the production of both inhibiting volatile metabolites and lithic enzymes that degrade the chitin of the eggs. Morton27 stated that the chitinolytical activity is likely the most relevant for the lesion on the sheath of the egg. This suggests that the ovicidal activity of the observed Trichoderma spp. on T. canis eggs in the current study may be due to some of the aforementioned mechanisms. However, further research is needed to determine the exact ovicidal mechanism used by the fungus. Although our study has not identified the species of Trichoderma isolated, our results differ from Ciarmela et al.,8 who found that T. harzianum does not affect the viability of T. canis eggs.

In Argentina, Ciarmela et al.7,8 evaluated ovicidal activity of isolated fungi in soil of public localities in the city of La Plata and showed the activity of Fusarium pallidoroseum, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium sulphureum and Fusarium moniliforme on T. canis eggs. In a similar study, Gortari et al.20 demonstrated the efficiency of various fungal genera on eggs of the same parasite, among which were Acremonium, Aspergillus, Fusarium, Mucor, Paecilomyces, and others. The observed ovicidal effect of the genus Fusarium in our study and in those of Ciarmela et al.7,8 and Gortari et al.20 indicate the potential of these fungi as agents of biological control of helminthic eggs. Larger investigations are necessary.

The most studied nematophagous fungi, Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pochonia chlamydosporia, stand out for their ovicidal activity. In vitro studies have shown the efficiency of these fungi on embryonated T. canis eggs.1,6,18 Although they are the species most often cited as ovicides, Pochonia chlamydosporia and Paecilomyces lilacinus were not isolated from the soil in this study.

Conclusion

The results of this study verify the presence of fungi parasitic to T. canis eggs in the soil from the Southern region of Brazil and highlight the ovicidal activity of Trichoderma and Fusarium solani complex. However, more studies to prove the biological potential of fungi evaluated, as well as their mechanisms of ovicidal action, are required. We believe that further research aimed at the search for autochthonous fungi with nematophagous potential is important, since the adaptation of the fungus to different regional conditions is a key factor to the biological control of parasites.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Financial support

Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).

References
[1]
J.V. Araújo, M.A. Santos, S. Ferraz.
Efeito ovicida de fungos nematófagos sobre ovos embrionados de Toxocara canis.
Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec, 47 (1995), pp. 37-42
[2]
O.O. Barriga.
A critical look at the importance, prevalence and control of toxocariasis and the possibilities of immunological control.
Vet Parasitol, 29 (1988), pp. 195-234
[3]
P.C. Beaver.
The nature of visceral larva migrans.
J Parasitol, 55 (1969), pp. 3-12
[4]
F.R. Braga, J.V. Araújo, A.K. Campos, R.O. Carvalho, A.R. Silva, A.O. Tavela, et al.
Observação in vitro da ação dos isolados fúngicos Duddingtonia flagrans, Monacrosporium thaumasium e Verticillium chlamydosporium sobre ovos de Ascaris lumbricoides (Lineu, 1758).
Rev Soc Bras Med Tropic, 40 (2007), pp. 356-358
[5]
E.A. Carvalho, R.L. Rocha, Toxocariasis:.
visceral larva migrans in children.
J Pediatr, 87 (2011), pp. 100-110
[6]
R.O. Carvalho, J.V. Araújo, F.R. Braga, J.M. Araújo, C.D. Alves.
Ovicidal activity of Pochonia chlamydosporia and Paecilomyces lilacinus on Toxocara canis eggs.
Vet Parasit, 169 (2010), pp. 123-127
[7]
M.L. Ciarmela, M.C. Minvielle, G. Lori, J.A. Basualdo.
Biological interaction between soil fungi and Toxocara canis eggs.
Vet Parasitol, 103 (2002), pp. 251-257
[8]
M.L. Ciarmela, A.M. Arambarri, J.A. Basualdo, M.C. Minvielle.
Effect of saprotrophic soil fungi on Toxocara canis eggs.
Mal J Microbiol, 6 (2010), pp. 75-80
[9]
G.S. De Hoog, J. Guarro, M.J. Gene e Figueras.
2nd ed, Holanda, (2000),
[10]
D. Despommier.
Toxocariasis: clinical aspects, epidemiology, medical ecology, and molecular aspects.
Clin Microbiol Rev, 16 (2003), pp. 265-272
[11]
K.H. Domsch, W. Gams, T.H. Anderson.
Compendium of soil fungi.
IHW-Verlag, (1995),
[12]
C.L. Duddington.
Notes on the technique of handling predaceous fungi.
Trans Brit Mycol Soc, 38 (1955), pp. 97-103
[13]
S.J. Eapen, B. Beena, K.V. Ramana.
Tropical soil microflora of spice-based cropping systems as potential antagonists of root-knot nematodes.
J Invertebr Pathol, 88 (2005), pp. 218-225
[14]
Y.A. Espinoza, P.E. Huapaya, W.H. Roldán, S. Jiménez, E.P. Abanto, C.A. Rojas, et al.
Seroprevalence of human toxocariasis in andean communities from the northeast of Lima.
Peru Rev Inst Med Trop, 52 (2010), pp. 31-36
[15]
L.Z. Ethur, E. Blume, M. Muniz, A.C.F. Silva, D.R. Stefanelo, E.K. Rocha.
Fungos antagonistas a Sclerotinia sclerotiorum em pepineiro cultivado em estufa.
Fitopatol Bras, 30 (2005), pp. 127-133
[16]
P.A. Ferreira, S. Ferraz, E.A. Lopes, L.G. Freitas.
Parasitismo de ovos de Meloidogyne exigua por fungos nematófagos e estudo da compatibilidade entre os isolados fúngicos.
Rev Trop Cien Agrar e Biol, 2 (2008), pp. 15-21
[17]
S.D. Figueiredo, J.A. Taddei, J.J. Menezes, N.F. Novo, E.O. Silva, H.L. Cristóvão.
Estudo clínico-epidemiológico da toxocaríase em população infantil.
J Pediatr, 81 (2005), pp. 126-132
[18]
L.N. Frassy, F.R. Braga, A.R. Silva, J.V. Araújo, S.R. Ferreira, L.G. Freitas.
Destruição de ovos de Toxocara canis pelo fungo nematófago Pochonia chlamydosporia.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop, 43 (2010), pp. 102-104
[19]
T. Gallina, M.A.M.P. Silva, L.L.D. Castro, E.W. Wendt, M.M. Villela, M.E.A. Berne.
Presence of eggs of Toxocara spp. and hookworms in a student environment in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Rev Bras de Parasit Vet Jaboticabal, 20 (2011), pp. 176-177
[20]
C. Gortari, C. Cazau, R. Hours.
Hongos nematófagos de huevos de Toxocara canis en un paseo público de La Plata.
Argentina Rev Iberoam Micol, 24 (2007), pp. 24-28
[22]
S. Katagiri, T.C.G. Oliveira-Sequeira.
Prevalence of dog intestinal parasites and risk perception of zoonotic infection by dog owners in São Paulo state, Brazil.
Zoo Pub Health, 55 (2008), pp. 406-413
[23]
M.B. Labruna, H.F.J. Pena, S.L.P. Souza, A. Pinter, J.C.R. Silva, A.M.A. Ragozo, et al.
Prevalência de endoparasitas em cães da área urbana do município de Monte Negro.
Rondônia Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, 73 (2006), pp. 183-193
[24]
H. Lysek.
A scanning electron microscope study of the effect of an ovicidal fungus on the eggs of Ascaris lumbricoides.
Parasitology, 77 (1978), pp. 139-141
[25]
R.G. Mafia, A.C. Alfenas, L.A. Maffia, G.M. Ventura, E.A. Sanfuentes.
Encapsulamento de Trichoderma inhamatum para o controle biológico de Rhizoctonia solani na propagação clonal de Eucalyptus.
Fitopatol Bras, 28 (2003), pp. 101-105
[26]
R. Mankau.
Biocontrol: fungi as nematode control agents.
J Nemat, 12 (1980), pp. 244-252
[27]
C.O. Morton, P.R. Hirsch, B.R. Kerry.
Infection of plant-parasitic nematodes by nematophagous fungi – a review of the application of molecular biology to understand infection processes and to improve biological control.
Nematology, 6 (2004), pp. 161-170
[28]
M.A. Mota, A.K. Campos, J.V. Araújo.
Controle biológico de helmintos parasitos de animais: estágio atual e perspectivas futuras.
Pesq Vet Bras, 23 (2003), pp. 93-100
[29]
P.A.M. Overgaauw.
Aspects of Toxocara epidemiology: human toxocarosis.
Crit Rev Microbiol, 23 (1997), pp. 215-231
[30]
F.R.A. Patrício, H. Kimati, J.T. Neto, A. Petenatti, B.C. Barros.
Efeito da solarização do solo, seguida pela aplicação de Trichoderma spp. ou de fungicidas, sobre o controle de Pythium aphanidermatum e de Rhizoctonia solani AG-4.
Summa Phytopathol Botucatu, 33 (2007), pp. 142-146
[31]
N. Romano, M.O. Nor Azah, N. Rahma, Y.A.L. Lim, M. Rohela.
Seroprevalence of toxocariasis among Orang Asli (Indigenous people) in Malaysia using two immunoassay.
Trop Biomed, 27 (2010), pp. 585-594
[32]
SAS.
Statistical analysis system user's guide: statistics. Version 8.2.
Statistical Analysis 432 System Institute, (2001),
[33]
V.A. Santarém, P.A.F. Chesini, B.E.L. Lamers, G.R. Elefant, R. Giuffrida.
Anti-Toxocara spp. antibodies in sheep from southeastern Brazil.
Vet Parasitol, 179 (2011), pp. 283-286
[34]
Santin RCM. Potencial do uso dos fungos Trichoderma spp. e Paecilomyces lilacinus no biocontrole de Meloidogyne incognita e Phaseolus vulgaris. Tese de Doutorado. Programa de Pós Graduação em. Fitotecnia. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil, 2008; 91 p. [thesis in portuguese].
[35]
E. Sharon, M. Bar-Eyal, I. Chet, A. Herrera-Estrella, O. Kleifeld, Y. Spiegel.
Biocontrol of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica by Trichoderma harzianum.
Phytop, 91 (2001), pp. 687-693
[36]
E. Sharon, I. Chet, A. Viterbo, M. Bar-Eyal, H. Nagan, G.J. Samuels, et al.
Parasitism of Trichoderma on Meloidogyne javanica and role of the gelatinous matrix.
Eur J Plant Pathol, 118 (2007), pp. 247-258
[37]
C.R. Stensvold, J. Skov, L.N. Møller, P.M. Jensen, C.M.O. Kapel, E. Petersen, et al.
Seroprevalence of human toxocariasis in Denmark.
Clin Vaccine Immunol, 16 (2009), pp. 1372-1373
[38]
A.L.C. Tavares, C.J. Scaini, G. Müller, N.A.R. Farias, M.E.A. Berne.
Contaminação do solo de praças de conjunto habitacionais por helmintos e protozoários em Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
Vittalle Rio Grande, 20 (2008), pp. 59-63
[39]
G.L. Windham, M.T. Windham, W.P. Williams.
Effects of Trichoderma spp. on maize growth and Meloidogyne arenaria reproduction.
Plant Dis, 73 (1989), pp. 493-495
Copyright © 2012. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas