Información del artículo
Resumen
El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar los efectos directos de la localización de las empresas en parques científicos y tecnológicos y de la cooperación en I+D+i en la innovación de las empresas. Los resultados obtenidos con una muestra de 784 empresas españolas han permitido confirmar, por una parte, que las empresas situadas en parques científicos y tecnológicos son más innovadoras en aspectos organizativos y comerciales y, por otra, que las empresas que cooperan en I+D+i también realizan más innovaciones de producto, de proceso, organizativas y comerciales que las que no cooperan.
Palabras clave:
Innovación
Cooperación
Localización
Parques científicos y tecnológicos
I+D+i
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze the effect of locating in science and technology parks and R+D+i cooperation on innovation. For this we have selected a sample of 784 companies, of which half are located in science and technology parks. Results show that companies located in a park are more innovative in the organizational and commercial activities, and companies that cooperate in R+D+i are more likely to be innovative in both product and process, as well as organizational and commercial aspects.
Keywords:
Innovation
Cooperation
Location
Science and technology parks
R+D+i
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[Baumol, 2004]
W.J. Baumol.
Entrepreneurship cultures and countercultures.
Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3 (2004), pp. 316-326
[Bayona Sáez et al., 2001]
C. Bayona Sáez, T. García Marco, E. Huerta Arribas.
Firms' Motivations for Cooperative R&D: An Empirical Analysis of Spanish Firms.
Research Policy, 30 (2001), pp. 1289-1307
[Beugelsdijk, 2007]
S. Beugelsdijk.
The regional environment and a firm's innovative performance: A plea for a multilevel interactionist approach.
Economic Geography, 83 (2007), pp. 181-199
[Becker and Dietz, 2004]
W. Becker, J. Dietz.
R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms — evidence for the German manufacturing industry.
Research Policy, 33 (2004), pp. 209-223
[Belderbos et al., 2004]
R. Belderbos, M. Carree, B. Diederen, B. Lokshin, R. Veugelers.
Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22 (2004), pp. 1237-1263
[Bellavista and Adán, 2009]
J. Bellavista, C. Adán.
Los parques científicos y tecnológicos en el desarrollo de la ciencia, la tecnología y la empresa.
SEBBM, 161 (2009), pp. 6-11
[Cantù, 2010]
C. Cantù.
Exploring the role of spatial relationships to transform knowledge in a business idea — Beyond a geographic proximity.
Industrial Marketing Management, 39 (2010), pp. 887-897
[Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002]
B. Cassiman, R. Veugelers.
R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium.
American Economic Review, 92 (2002), pp. 1169-1184
[Castro et al., 2011]
L.M. Castro, M.A. Montoro-Sanchez, M. Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado.
Innovation in service industries: Current and future trends.
Service Industries Journal, 31 (2011), pp. 7-20
[Chen and Choi, 2004]
S. Chen, C.J. Choi.
Creating a knowledge-based city: The example of Hsinchu science park.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 8 (2004), pp. 73-82
[Chesbrough, 2003]
H.W. Chesbrough.
Open innovation: The new imperative for creating andpProfiting from technology.
Harvard Business School Press, (2003),
[Chesbrough, 2006]
H.W. Chesbrough.
Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation.
Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm,
[Christensen et al., 1999]
Christensen, J.L., Rogaczewska, A.P. y Vinding, A.L. (1999). Summary report of the Focus Group on Innovative Firms Network. Disponible en: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/1/2368818.pdf.
[Cohen and Levinthal, 1989]
W.M. Cohen, D.A. Levinthal.
Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D.
The Economic Journal, 99 (1989), pp. 569-596
[Colombo and Delmastro, 2002]
M. Colombo, M. Delmastro.
How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy.
Research Policy, 31 (2002), pp. 1103-1122
[Coombs et al., 2003]
R. Coombs, M. Harvey, B.S. Tether.
Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation.
Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (2003), pp. 1125-1155
[Cooper and Dunkelberg, 1986]
A.C. Cooper, W.C. Dunkelberg.
Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership.
Strategic Management Journal, 7 (1986), pp. 53-68
[Debackere and Veugelers, 2005]
K. Debackere, R. Veugelers.
The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links.
Research Policy, 34 (2005), pp. 321-342
[Feldman, 2007]
J.M. Feldman.
The managerial equation and innovation platforms: The case of Linköping and Berzelius science park.
European Planning Studies, 15 (2007), pp. 1027-1045
[Felsenstein, 1994]
D. Felsenstein.
University-related Science Parks –‘seedbeds’ or ‘enclaves’ of innovation?.
Technovation, 14 (1994), pp. 93-110
[Fontana et al., 2006]
R. Fontana, A. Geuna, M. Matt.
Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling.
Research Policy, 35 (2006), pp. 39-323
[Fukugawa, 2006]
N. Fukugawa.
Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24 (2006), pp. 381-400
[Galende and De la Fuente, 2003]
J. Galende, J.M. De la Fuente.
Internal factors determining a firm's innovative behaviour.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 715-736
[García Muiña et al., 2011]
F.E. García Muiña, E. Pelechano Barahona, J.E. Navas López.
El desarrollo de innovaciones tecnológicas estratégicas: El efecto mediador de la complejidad en el sector de la biotecnología en España.
Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 20 (2011), pp. 35-52
[Hagedoorn, 2002]
J. Hagedoorn.
Inter-firm partnership: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960.
Research Policy, 31 (2002), pp. 477-492
[Haeussler et al., 2010]
C. Haeussler, H. Patzelt, S.A. Zahra.
Strategic alliances and product development in high technology new firms: The moderating effect of technological capabilities.
Journal of Business Venturing, (2010),
[IASP, 2002]
IASP (2002). International Association of Science Parks. Dispònible en: http://www.iasp.ws/.
[Ireland et al., 2006]
R.D. Ireland, M.A. Hitt, J.W. Webb.
Entrepreneurial alliances and networks.
Handbook of strategic alliances,
[Jonsson, 2002]
O. Jonsson.
Innovation processes and proximity: The case of IDEON firms in Lund, Sweden.
European Planning Studies, 10 (2002), pp. 705-722
[Laursen and Salter, 2006]
K. Laursen, A. Salter.
Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms.
Strategic Management Journal, 27 (2006), pp. 131-150
[Lee and Yang, 2000]
W.H. Lee, W.T. Yang.
The cradle of Taiwan high technology industry development-Hsinchu science park.
Technovation, 20 (2000), pp. 55-59
[Lindelöf and Löfsten, 2003]
P. Lindelöf, H. Löfsten.
Science park location and new technology-based firms in Sweden: Implications for strategy performance.
Small Business Economics, 20 (2003), pp. 245-258
[Lindelöf and Löftsen, 2004]
P. Lindelöf, H. Löftsen.
Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University-industry links for technology transfer.
Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (2004), pp. 311-326
[Link and Scott, 2003]
A.N. Link, J.T. Scott.
U.S. science parks: The diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 (2003), pp. 1323-1356
[Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2001]
H. Löfsten, P. Lindelöf.
Science parks in Sweden: industrial renewal and development?.
R&D Management, 31 (2001), pp. 309-322
[Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2002]
H. Löfsten, P. Lindelöf.
Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms: Academic–industry links, innovation and markets.
Research Policy, 31 (2002), pp. 859-876
[Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2003]
H. Löfsten, P. Lindelöf.
Determinants for an entrepreneurial milieu: Science parks and business policy in growing firms.
Technovation, 23 (2003), pp. 51-64
[Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2005]
H. Löfsten, P. Lindelöf.
R&D networks and product innovation patterns-academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on science parks.
Technovation, 25 (2005), pp. 1025-1037
[Lööf and Broström, 2008]
H. Lööf, A. Broström.
Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness?.
Journal Technology Transfer, 33 (2008), pp. 73-90
[López, 2008]
A. López.
Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence form Spanish manufacturing firms.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 6 (2008), pp. 113-136
[Lopez-Fernandez et al., 2008]
M.C. Lopez-Fernandez, A.M. Serrano-Bedia, G. Garcia-Piqueres.
Exploring determinants of company-university R&D collaboration in Spain.
Journal of Manufacturing & Technology Management, 19 (2008), pp. 361-373
[López Fernández et al., 2010]
C. López Fernández, A.M. Serrano Bedia, G. García Piqueres.
Cooperación institucional en I+D+i y patrones de comportamiento empresarial: Evidencia de las empresas manufactureras y de servicios en España.
Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19 (2010), pp. 7-26
[Love and Roper, 1999]
J.H. Love, S. Roper.
The determinants of innovation: R&D, technology transfer and networking effects.
Review of Industrial Organizations, 15 (1999), pp. 43-64
[Lumpkin and Dess, 1996]
G.T. Lumpkin, G.G. Dess.
Simplicity as a strategy-making process: The effects of stage of organizational development and environment on performance.
Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1996), pp. 135-172
[Malairaja and Zawdie, 2008]
C. Malairaja, G. Zawdie.
Science parks and university-industry collaboration in Malaysia.
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20 (2008), pp. 727-739
[Martínez Román et al., 2011]
J.A. Martínez Román, J. Gamero Rojas, J.A. Tamayo Gallego.
Hacia una tipología empresarial basada en los factores explicativos de la intensidad innovadora: Una aplicación empírica.
Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 20 (2011), pp. 143-160
[Montalvo, 2006]
C. Montalvo.
What triggers change and innovation?.
Technovation, 26 (2006), pp. 312-323
[Montoro-Sánchez et al., 2011]
A. Montoro-Sánchez, E.M. Mora-Valentín, M. Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado.
R&D Cooperation in Science and Technology parks: The Advantages of Location.
Strategic Alliances for Value Creation, pp. 73-99
[Montoro-Sanchez et al., 2011]
M.A. Montoro-Sanchez, M. Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, E.M. Mora-Valentin.
Effects of Knowledge Spillovers on Innovation and Collaboration in Science and Technology Parks.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 15 (2011), pp. 948-970
[Mu et al., 2008]
J. Mu, E. Love, G. Peng.
Interfirm networks, social capital, and knowledge flow.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 12 (2008), pp. 86-100
[Narula and Santangelo, 2009]
R. Narula, G.D. Santangelo.
Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry.
Research Policy, 38 (2009), pp. 393-403
[Navarro Arancegui, 2002]
M. Navarro Arancegui.
La cooperación para la innovación en la empresa española desde una perspectiva internacional comparada.
Economía Industrial, 346 (2002), pp. 47-66
[Nooteboom, 1999]
B. Nooteboom.
Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy.
Research Policy, 28 (1999), pp. 793-805
[OECD, 2002]
OECD.
The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), (2002),
[OECD, 2005]
OECD.
Guidelines for colleting and interpreting innovation data: Oslo Manual.
Tercera edición, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) y EURSTAT, (2005),
[Ondategui, 2002]
J.C. Ondategui.
Parques científicos e innovación en España: Quince años de experiencia.
Economía Industrial, 346 (2002), pp. 147-160
[Phillimore, 1999]
J. Phillimore.
Beyond the linear view of innovation in science park evaluation: An analysis of Western Australian technology park.
Technovation, 19 (1999), pp. 673-680
[Phan et al., 2005]
P. Phan, D. Siegel, M. Wright.
Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research.
Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (2005), pp. 165-182
[Piga and Vivarelli, 2004]
C. Piga, M. Vivarelli.
Internal and external R&D: A sample selection approach.
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66 (2004), pp. 457-482
[Santamaría et al., 2010]
L. Santamaría, M.J. Nieto, A. Barge-Gil.
The relevance of different open innovations strategies for R&D performers.
Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 45 (2010), pp. 93-114
[Schilling and Phelps, 2007]
M.A. Schilling, C.C. Phelps.
Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation.
Management Science, 53 (2007), pp. 1113-1126
[Simonen and McCann, 2008]
J. Simonen, P. McCann.
Innovation, R&D cooperation and labour recruitment: Evidence from Finland.
Small Business Economics, 31 (2008), pp. 181-194
[Squicciarini, 2008]
M. Squicciarini.
Science parks' tenants versus out-of-park firms: Who innovates more? A duration model.
Journal of Technology Transfer, 33 (2008), pp. 45-71
[Squicciarini, 2009]
Squicciarini, M. (2009). Science parks, knowledge spillovers, and firms' innovative performance. Evidence from Finland. Economics, The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, Discussion Paper, N. 2009-32, July 9. Disponible en: http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2009-32.
[Schumpeter, 1934]
J.A. Schumpeter.
The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle.
Harvard University Press, (1934),
[Tappeiner et al., 2008]
G. Tappeiner, C. Hauser, J. Walde.
Regional knowledge spillovers: Fact or artifact?.
Research Policy, 37 (2008), pp. 861-874
[Teng, 2007]
B.S. Teng.
Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: A resource-based approach toward competitive advantage.
Journal of Management Studies, 44 (2007), pp. 119-142
[Tether, 2002]
B.S. Tether.
Who co-operates for innovation, and why.
An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31 (2002), pp. 947-967
[Un et al., 2009]
C.A. Un, A.M. Romero-Martinez, A. Montoro-Sanchez.
Determinants of R&D collaboration of service firms.
Service Business, 3 (2009), pp. 373-394
[Vedovello, 1997]
C. Vedovello.
Science parks and university-industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force.
Technovation, 17 (1997), pp. 491-502
[Vega-Jurado et al., 2009]
J. Vega-Jurado, A. Gutierrez-Gracia, I. Fernandez-de-Lucio.
Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry.
Industrial & Corporate Change, 18 (2009), pp. 637-670
[Vega-Jurado et al., 2008]
J. Vega-Jurado, A. Gutierrez-Gracia, I. Fernandez-de-Lucio, L. Manjarres-Henriquez.
The effect of external and internal factors on firms' product innovation.
Research Policy, 37 (2008), pp. 616-632
[Verspagen and De Loo, 1999]
B. Verspagen, I. De Loo.
Technology spillovers between sectors and over time.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60 (1999), pp. 215-235
[Veugelers and Cassiman, 2005]
R. Veugelers, B. Cassiman.
R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23 (2005), pp. 355-379
[Westhead, 1997]
P. Westhead.
R&D inputs and outputs of technology-based firms located on and off science parks.
R&D Management, 27 (1997), pp. 45-62
[Westhead and Storey, 1994]
P. Westhead, D. Storey.
An assessment of firms located on and off science parks in the United Kingdom.
HMSO, (1994),
Copyright © 2012. AEDEM