Buscar en
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología Vertebroplastia percutánea para el tratamiento de las fracturas vertebrales por...
Información de la revista
Vol. 48. Núm. 3.
Páginas 186-194 (Enero 2004)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 48. Núm. 3.
Páginas 186-194 (Enero 2004)
Acceso a texto completo
Vertebroplastia percutánea para el tratamiento de las fracturas vertebrales por compresión de origen osteoporótico
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures osteoporotic
Visitas
6322
M.K. Bhatnagara,*, S.K. Mathura, E. Cruz-Oliverb, E. Cáceresc
a Orthopaedic Unit Johns Hopkins University Hospital. Baltimore, Maryland, Estados Unidos
b Servicio de COT. Fundació Asil. Hospital General de Granollers
c Servicio de COT IMAS. Hospitales del Mar y la Esperanza. Barcelona
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Diseño del estudio

Estudio retrospectivo de la inyección percutánea de cemento de polimetilmetacrilato en el cuerpo vertebral (vertebroplastia percutánea) para el tratamiento de las fracturas vertebrales por compresión de origen osteoporótico.

Objetivos

Evaluar la eficacia de la vertebroplastia percutánea utilizando un abordaje extrapedicular y comparar los resultados con otros estudios.

Material y métodos

Estudio retrospectivo de 200 pacientes consecutivos (162 mujeres y 38 varones) a los que se practicó una vertebroplastia percutánea a múltiples niveles. Se inyectaron 909 vértebras (4,5 niveles por paciente) para tratar 616 fracturas vertebrales por compresión (3,1 fracturas por paciente). En todos los niveles se usó un abordaje extrapedicular, salvo en L5, donde se optó por un abordaje transpedicular. Se evaluaron el dolor y las complicaciones con un seguimiento medio de 30 meses.

Resultados

El 95% de los pacientes manifestaron una mejoría significativa del dolor. El tiempo medio de inyección fue de 10,2 minutos por vértebra, y el tiempo quirúrgico medio por paciente fue de 49 minutos. Las complicaciones fueron infrecuentes (2%), pero importantes. Hubo dos fallecimientos. Un paciente requirió descompresión quirúrgica por una radiculopatía L5 por extrusión de cemento, y otro precisó una toracotomía por un hemotórax.

Conclusiones

La vertebroplastia percutánea mediante abordaje extrapedicular se ha mostrado efectiva para disminuir el dolor secundario a las fracturas osteoporóticas. La técnica proporciona estabilidad a la columna vertebral, reduciendo el dolor y mejorando la capacidad funcional.

Palabras clave:
vertebroplastia
fracturas por compresión
osteoporosis
extrapedicular
polimetilmetacrilato
Study design

Retrospective study of the percutaneous injection of polymethylmetacrylate cement in the vertebral body, or percutaneous vertebroplasty, for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures of osteoporotic origin.

Aims

To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty using an extrapedicular approach and compare results with those of other studies.

Materials and methods

Retrospective study of 200 consecutive patients (162 women and 38 men) in which multilevel percutaneous vertebroplasty was performed. Injections were made in 909 vertebrae (4.5 per patient) to treat vertebral compression fractures (3.1 fractures per patient). The approach was extrapedicular except in L5, where a transpedicular approach was used. Pain and complications were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 30 months.

Results

Ninety-five percent of patients experienced significant pain relief. The mean injection time was 10.2 minutes per vertebra and the mean operative time per patient was 49 minutes. Complications were infrequent (2%) but important. There were two deaths. One patient required surgical decompression of an L5 root compression by extruded cement and the other required thoracotomy for hemothorax.

Conclusions

Extrapedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty has been shown to be effective in relieving pain due to osteoporotic fracture. The technique stabilizes the spinal column, reducing pain and improving functional capacity.

Key words:
vertebroplasty
compression fractures
osteoporosis
extrapedicular
polymethylmetacrylate
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
C. Cooper, E. Atkinson, S. Jacobsen, W. O’Fallon, L. Melton.
Population study of survival following osteoporotic fractures.
Am J Epidemiol, 137 (1993), pp. 1001-1005
[2.]
H. Deramond, N. Wright, S. Belkoff.
Temperature elevation caused by bone cement polymerization during vertebroplasty.
Bone, 25 (1999), pp. 17S-21S
[3.]
J. Barr, M.S. Bar, T. Lemley, R. McCann.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization.
Spine, 25 (2000), pp. 923-928
[4.]
J. Martin, J. Sugiu, D. Ruiz.
Vertebroplasty: clinical experience and follow up results.
Bone, 25 (1999), pp. 11S-15S
[5.]
M. Jensen, A. Evans, J. Mathis, D. Kallmes, H. Cloft, J. Dion.
Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 18 (1997), pp. 1897-1904
[6.]
B. Cortet, A. Cotten, N. Boutry, F. Dewatre, R.M. Flipo, B. Duquesnoy, et al.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteolytic metastases or multiple myeloma.
Rev Rhum Engl Ed, 64 (1997), pp. 177-183
[7.]
A. Cotten, F. Dewatre, B. Cortet, R. Assaker, D. Leblond, B. Duquesnoy, et al.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up.
Radiology, 200 (1996), pp. 525-530
[8.]
C. Cyteval, M.P. Sarrabere, J.O. Roux, E. Thomas, C. Jorgensen, F. Blotman, et al.
Acute osteoporotic vertebral collapse: open study on percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement in 20 patients.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 173 (1999), pp. 1685-1690
[9.]
C. Ide, A. Gangi, A. Rimmelin, R. Beaujeux, D. Maitrot, F. Buchheit, et al.
Vertebral haemangiomas with spinal cord compression: the place of preoperative percutaneous vertebroplasty with methyl methacrylate.
Neuroradiology, 38 (1996), pp. 585-589
[10.]
A. Feydy, C. Cognard, Y. Miaux, M.T. Sola Martínez, A. Weill, M. Rose, et al.
Acrylic vertebroplasty in symptomatic cervical vertebral haemangiomas: report of 2 cases.
Neuroradiology, 38 (1996), pp. 389-391
[11.]
A. Weill, J. Chihras, J. Simon, M. Rose, T. Sola-Martínez, F. Eukaoua.
Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement.
Radiology, 199 (1996), pp. 241-247
[12.]
J. Chiras, C. Depriester, A. Weill, M. Sola-Martínez, H. Deramond.
Percutaneous vertebroplasties: technique and indications.
J Neuroradiol, 24 (1977), pp. 45-59
[13.]
A. Gangi, Kastler, J. Dietermann.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy.
AJNR, 15 (1994), pp. 83-86
[14.]
J.P. Kostuik.
Alternatives to spinal fusion.
Orthop Clin North Am, 29 (1998), pp. 701-715
[15.]
J.E. Zigler, P.A. Anderson, S.D. Boden, K.H. Bridwell, A.R. Vaccaro.
What’s new in spine surgery.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A (2003), pp. 1626-1636
[16.]
F. Enneking.
Cardiac arrest during total knee replacement using a long-steam prosthesis.
JCA, 7 (1995), pp. 253-263
[17.]
J. Duncan.
Intraoperative collapses or death related to the use of acrylic cement in hip surgery.
Anesthesia, 44 (1989), pp. 149-153
[18.]
E. Orsini, R. Richards, J. Mullen.
Fatal fat embolism during cemented total knee arthroplasty: a case report.
CJS, 29 (1986), pp. 385-386
[19.]
R. Beckenbaugh, H. Tressler, E. Johnson.
Results of hemiarthroplasty of the hip using a cemented femoral prosthesis: a review of 109 cases with an average follow-up of 36 months.
Mayo Clin Proc, 52 (1977), pp. 349-353
[20.]
K. François, Y. Taeymans, B. Poffyn, G. Van Nooten.
Successful management of a large pulmonary cement embolus after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a case report.
[21.]
B. Padovani, O. Kasriel, P. Brunner, P. Peretti-Viton.
Pulmonary embolism caused by acrylic cement: a rare complications of percutaneous vertebroplasty.
ANJR, 20 (1999), pp. 375-377
[22.]
I. Al-Assair, A. Pérez-Higueras, J. Forensa, A. Muñoz, E. Cuesta.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty: A special syringe for cement injection.
Bone, 25 (1999), pp. 11S-15S
[23.]
U. Wasnich.
Vertebral fracture epidemiology.
Bone, 18 (1996), pp. 179-183
[24.]
S. Dunnagan, M. Knox, S. Deaton.
Osteoporotic compression fracture with persistent pain: treatment with percutaneous vertebroplasty.
J Ark Med Soc, 96 (1999), pp. 258-259
[25.]
F. Grados, C. Depriester, G. Cayrolle, N. Hardy, H. Deramond, P. Fardellone.
Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Rheumatology (Oxford), 39 (2000), pp. 1410-1414
[26.]
S.M. Belkoff, J.M. Mathis, L.E. Jasper, H. Deramond.
An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of a hydroxyapatite cement for use with vertebroplasty.
Spine, 26 (2001), pp. 1542-1546
[27.]
S. Belkoff, M. Maroney, D. Fenton, J. Mathis.
An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of bone cements used in percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Bone, 25 (1999), pp. 23S-6S
[28.]
S. Belkoff, J. Mathis, E. Erbe, D. Fenton.
Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty.
Spine, 25 (2000), pp. 1061-1064
[29.]
H. Deramond, C. Depriester, P. Galibert, D. Le Gars.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. Technique, indications, and results.
Radiol Clin North Am, 36 (1998), pp. 533-546
[30.]
A. Tohmeh, J. Mathis, D. Fenton, A. Levin, S. Belkoff.
Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.
Spine, 24 (1999), pp. 1772-1776
[31.]
D.R. Wilson, E.R. Myers, J.M. Mathis, R.M. Scribner, J.A. Conta, M.A. Reiley, et al.
Effect of augmentation on the mechanics of vertebral wedge fractures.
Spine, 25 (2000), pp. 158-165
[32.]
J. Wijn de, T. Slooff, F. Driessens.
Characterization of bone cements.
Acta Orthop Scand, 46 (1975), pp. 38-51
[33.]
L. Jasper, H. Deramond, J. Mathis, S. Belkoff.
The effect of monomer-to-powder ratio on the material properties of Cranioplastic.
Bone, 25 (1999), pp. 27S-29S
[34.]
G. Cunin, H. Boissonet, H. Petite, C. Blanchat, G. Guillemin.
Experimental vertebroplasty using osteoconductive granular material.
Spine, 25 (2000), pp. 1070-1076
[35.]
B. Bai, L. Jarwazi, F. Kummer, J. Spivak.
The use of an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae and the management of vertebral compression fractures.
Spine, 24 (1999), pp. 1521-1526
[36.]
T. Einhorn.
Vertebroplasty: An opportunity to do something really good for patients.
Spine, 25 (2000), pp. 1051-1052
Copyright © 2004. Sociedad Española de Cirugia Ortopédica y Traumatología (SECOT)
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.recot.2024.03.004
No mostrar más