Buscar en
Revista de Administração e Inovação
Toda la web
Inicio Revista de Administração e Inovação Estado da arte da produção científica sobre indicadores e índices de inovaç...
Información de la revista
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Open Access
Estado da arte da produção científica sobre indicadores e índices de inovação
State of the Art of Scientific Production on Indicators and Innovation Index
Visitas
596
Rafael de Moura Speroni
Doutorando em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, Professor de Informática no Instituto Federal Catarinense – IFC, (Brasil)
Gertrudes Aparecida Dandolini
Doutora em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, Professora da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, (Brasil)
João Artur Souza
Doutor em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, Professora da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, (Brasil)
Fernando A. Ostuni Gauthier
Doutor em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, Professora da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, (Brasil)
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Recibido 06 septiembre 2014. Aceptado 05 noviembre 2015
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
RESUMO

A gestão da inovação mostra-se um desafio para as organizações na busca pela competitividade. Ao implementar um processo de gestão, tão importante quanto explicitar o modelo estratégico da inovação, é a capacidade de mensuração do que se deseja gerenciar. O uso de indicadores e índices de inovação permite, portanto, a verificação do desempenho de organizações ou regiões em separado ou em comparação com outras. A definição de indicadores de inovação não é, portanto, uma tarefa trivial, e diversas são ferramentas utilizadas, tais como estatísticas de patentes e P&D. Este trabalho apresenta uma revisão bibliométrica com o propósito mapear a produção científica relativa ao tema indicadores de inovação, identificando autores, obras e fontes de publicação mais relevantes. Para isso, foram analisados 107 trabalhos científicos que abordam o referido tema, escritos por 209 autores pertencentes a 115 instituições de 35 países diferentes. Os resultados mostram que a primeira publicação encontrada data do ano de 1973, mas o número de publicações mostra uma tendência de crescimento com o tempo e predominam as publicações em journals e a Europa é a região com maior número de autores, seguida da China, Brasil e Estados Unidos.

Palavras-chave:
Indicadores de Inovação
Índices de Inovação
Inovação
Bibliometria
Pesquisa bibliográfica
ABSTRACT

Innovation management is a challenge for organizations that aim to be competitive. When implementing a management process, the ability to measure what is to be managed is very important as it is the explanation of the strategic model of the innovation. The use of indicators allows verifying the development of the organizations or the development of each one of the regions individually, or in comparison to each other. Identifying indicators for innovation is crucial and there are several tools to help in this process, such as the patent statistics and R&D. This paper presents a bibliometric review wich aims to map the scientific production about Innovation Indicators. We have analysed 107 scientific articles from 209 authors working for 115 different institutions in 35 countries. Results show that the first article was published in 1973, and the number of publications tends to increase with time. The majority of the articles are published in journals and Europe is the region that counts the largest number of authors, followed by China, Brazil and the United States.

Keywords:
Innovation Indicator
Innovation Index
Innovation
Bibliometrics
Bibliographic research
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
REFERÊNCIAS
[Araújo, and Alvarenga, 2011]
R.F.d. Araújo, L. Alvarenga.
A Bibliometria na Pesquisa Científica da Pós-Graduação Brasileira de 1987 a 2007.
Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 16 (2011),
[Baron and Delcamp, 2012]
J. Baron, H. Delcamp.
The private and social value of patents in discrete and cumulative innovation.
Scientometrics, 90 (2012), pp. 581-606
[Bessant and Tidd, 2009]
J. Bessant, J. Tidd.
Inovação e Empreendedorismo, Bookman, (2009),
[Blackman et al., 1973]
A.W. Blackman Jr., E.J. Seligman, G.C. Sogliero.
An innovation index based on factor analysis.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 4 (1973), pp. 301-316
[Blankley and Booyens, 2010]
W.O. Blankley, I. Booyens.
Building a Knowledge Economy in South Africa.
South African Journal of Science, 106 (2010), pp. 15-20
[Booyens, 2011]
I. Booyens.
Are small, medium- and micro-sized enterprises engines of innovation? The reality in South Africa.
Science & Public Policy (SPP), 38 (2011), pp. 67-78
[Booyens et al., 2013]
I. Booyens, N. Molotja, M. Phiri.
Innovation in High-Technology SMMEs: The Case of the New Media Sector in Cape Town.
Urban Forum, 24 (2013), pp. 289-306
[Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO, 2013]
Cornell University INSEAD & WIPO.
The Global Innovation Index 2013: The Local Dynamics of Innovation, (2013),
[Crişan et al., 2010]
D.A. Crişan, A.-M. Preda, C. Coculescu, A.N. AltAr-Samuel.
Some Aspects Concerning the Correlation Between ICT and Innovation in Europe.
Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 19 (2010), pp. 1183-1189
[Czarnitzki et al., 2011]
D. Czarnitzki, P. Hanel, J.M. Rosa.
Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms.
Research Policy, 40 (2011), pp. 217-229
[Czarnitzki and Kraft, 2004]
D. Czarnitzki, K. Kraft.
Innovation indicators and corporate credit ratings: Evidence from German firms.
Economics Letters, 82 (2004), pp. 377-384
[de Brito Cruz and Mello, 2006]
C.H. de Brito Cruz, L.d. Mello.
Boosting Innovation Performance in Brazil.
Stimuler l’innovation en Brésil., 6 (2006), pp. 1-33
[Frietsch and Schmoch, 2010]
R. Frietsch, U. Schmoch.
Transnational patents and international markets.
Scientometrics, 82 (2010), pp. 185-200
[Gates and Langevin, 2010]
S. Gates, P. Langevin.
Human capital measures, strategy, and performance: HR managers’ perceptions.
Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23 (2010), pp. 111-132
[Gotsch and Hipp, 2012]
M. Gotsch, C. Hipp.
Measurement of innovation activities in the knowledge-intensive services industry: a trademark approach.
Service Industries Journal, 32 (2012), pp. 2167-2184
[Grupp and Schubert, 2010]
H. Grupp, T. Schubert.
Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance.
Research Policy, 39 (2010), pp. 67-78
[Hollenstein, 2003]
H. Hollenstein.
Innovation modes in the Swiss service sector: A cluster analysis based on firm-level data.
Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 845-863
[Ibge, 2010]
C.d.I. Ibge.
Pesquisa de inovação tecnológica: 2008, IBGE, (2010),
[Insead and Karabell, 2012]
Insead, S. Karabell.
Global Innovation Index 2012: Stronger innovation linkages for global growth INSEAD Knowledge Publications, INSEAD, (2012), pp. 1-2
[Johnson and Chuang, 2010]
W.H.A. Johnson, M. Chuang.
A comparative innovation study of China, Japan and Taiwan.
Chinese Management Studies, 4 (2010), pp. 385-400
[Joiozo and Teles, 2011]
R. Joiozo, V.K. Teles.
Human capital and innovation: Evidence from panel cointegration tests.
Applied Economics Letters, 18 (2011), pp. 1629-1632
[Kleinknecht et al., 2002]
A. Kleinknecht, K. Van Montfort, E. Brouwer.
The Non-Trivial Choice Between Innovation Indicators.
Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 11 (2002), pp. 109
[Kobashi and Santos, 2006]
N.Y. Kobashi, R.N.M.d. Santos.
Institucionalização da pesquisa científica no Brasil:cartografia temática e de redes sociaispor meio de técnicas bibliométricas.
TranInformação, 18 (2006), pp. 10
[Leydesdorff, 2004]
L. Leydesdorff.
The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55 (2004), pp. 991-1001
[Liebreich, 2005]
M. Liebreich.
GEIX market capitalisation doubles in first three quarters of 2005.
[Liebreich, 2006]
M. Liebreich.
The WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index (NEX).
[Macias-Chapula, 1998]
C.A. Macias-Chapula.
O papel da informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional.
Ciência da Informação, 27 (1998), pp. 7
[Mahroum and Alsaleh, 2012]
S. Mahroum, Y. Alsaleh.
Measuring Innovation Efficacy: An Operational Framework for Mapping and Measuring Innovation Capacity and Performance of Countries INSEAD Working Papers Collection, INSEAD, (2012), pp. 1-39
[Mahroum and Alsaleh, 2013]
S. Mahroum, Y. Alsaleh.
Towards a functional framework for measuring national innovation efficacy.
[Makkonen and Have, 2013]
T. Makkonen, R.P. Have.
Benchmarking regional innovative performance: composite measures and direct innovation counts.
Scientometrics, 94 (2013), pp. 247-262
[Makkonen and van der Have, 2013]
T. Makkonen, R.P. van der Have.
Benchmarking regional innovative performance: Composite measures and direct innovation counts.
Scientometrics, 94 (2013), pp. 247-262
[Moses et al., 2012]
C. Moses, M.M. Sithole, W. Blankley, D. Labadarios, H. Makelane, N. Nkobole.
The state of innovation in South Africa: Findings from the South African National Innovation Survey.
South African Journal of Science, 108 (2012), pp. 1-5
[Muresan and Gogu, 2012]
M. Muresan, E. Gogu.
Tertiary education’s role in research and innovation.
[Nelson, 2009]
A. Nelson.
Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion.
Research Policy, 38 (2009), pp. 12
[OECD, 2005]
OECD.
Oslo Manual - Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3 ed., OECD, (2005),
[Paas and Poltimäe, 2012]
T. Paas, H. Poltimäe.
Consistency between innovation indicators and national innovation performance in the case of small economies.
Eastern Journal of European Studies, 13 (2012), pp. 101-121
[Pizzani, 2012]
L.e.a. Pizzani.
A arte da pesquisa bibliográfica na busca do conhecimento.
Rev. Dig. Bibl. Ci. Inf, 10 (2012), pp. 53-66
[Porter, 2005]
A.L. Porter.
QTIP: Quick technology intelligence processes.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72 (2005), pp. 1070-1081
[Porter, 2007a]
A.L. Porter.
How “tech mining” can enhance R&D management.
Research Technology Management, 50 (2007), pp. 15-20
[Porter, 2007b]
A.L. Porter.
Tech mining to accelerate radical innovation, (2007),
[Preda et al., 2011]
A.-M. Preda, J.L. Stanica, D.A. Crisan, C. Coculescu.
E-Government: A Driving Factor for Stimulating Innovation Performance in Romania? Annals of the University of Oradea.
Economic Science Series, 20 (2011), pp. 125-130
[Quintane et al., 2011]
E. Quintane, R.M. Casselman, B.S. Reiche, P.A. Nylund.
Innovation as knowledge-based outcome.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 15 (2011),
[Ratanawaraha and Polenske, 2007]
A. Ratanawaraha, K.R. Polenske.
Measuring the geography of innovation: A literature review.
The economic geography of innovation, pp. 30
[Ribeiro et al., 2013]
H.C.M. Ribeiro, C.B.S. Cirani, E.J. Freitas.
AnÁlise Da ProduÇÃo CientÍfica Da Revista De AdministraÇÃo E InovaÇÃo.
Review of Administration and Innovation - RAI, 10 (2013), pp. 208
[Rinne et al., 2012]
T. Rinne, G.D. Steel, J. Fairweather.
Hofstede and Shane Revisited: The Role of Power Distance and Individualism in National-Level Innovation Success.
Cross-Cultural Research, 46 (2012), pp. 91-108
[Rongdi and Jun, 2011]
J. Rongdi, W. Jun.
Analysis on determinants of knowledge diffusion based on patent citations.
[Saisana et al., 2005]
M. Saisana, A. Saltelli, S. Tarantola.
Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 168 (2005), pp. 17
[Schmoch and Gauch, 2009]
U. Schmoch, S. Gauch.
Service marks as indicators for innovation in knowledge-based services.
Research Evaluation, 18 (2009), pp. 323-335
[Steel et al., 2012]
G.D. Steel, T. Rinne, J. Fairweather.
Personality, nations, and innovation: Relationships between personality traits and national innovation scores.
Cross-Cultural Research, 46 (2012), pp. 3-30
[Wang et al., 2011]
X. Wang, X.Z. Zhang, S. Xu.
Patent co-citation networks of Fortune 500 companies.
Scientometrics, 88 (2011), pp. 761-770
[Watts and Porter, 2003]
R.J. Watts, A.L. Porter.
R and D cluster quality measures and technology maturity.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70 (2003), pp. 735-758
[Zabala-Iturriagagoitia et al., 2007]
J.M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, F. Jiménez-Sáez, E. Castro-Martínez, A. Gutiérrez-Gracia.
What indicators do (or do not) tell us about Regional Innovation Systems.
Scientometrics, 70 (2007), pp. 85-106
[Zhu and Porter, 2002]
D. Zhu, A.L. Porter.
Automated extraction and visualization of information for technological intelligence and forecasting.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69 (2002), pp. 495-506
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltda. on behalf of Departamento de Administração Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade Universidade de São Paulo ¿ FEA/USP
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas