Buscar en
Psychosocial Intervention
Toda la web
Inicio Psychosocial Intervention Blueprints for Europe: Promoting Evidence-Based Programmes in Children's Ser...
Información de la revista
Vol. 21. Núm. 2.
Evidence-Based Programs for Children, Youth and Families: Introduction to the Special Issue
Páginas 205-214 (Agosto 2012)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Spanish PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 21. Núm. 2.
Evidence-Based Programs for Children, Youth and Families: Introduction to the Special Issue
Páginas 205-214 (Agosto 2012)
Open Access
Blueprints for Europe: Promoting Evidence-Based Programmes in Children's Services
Blueprints para Europa: Promoviendo Programas Basados en la Evidencia en los Servicios de Atención a la Infancia
Visitas
4751
Nick Axford1,*
Autor para correspondencia
naxford@dartington.org.uk

Lower Hood Barn, Dartington, Totnes, TQ9 6AB Devon, UK.
, Delbert S. Elliott2, Michael Little1
1 The Social Research Unit, Dartington, UK
2 University of Colorado, and Founding Director of Blueprints, USA
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Abstract

This article describes the Blueprints database of evidence-based programmes (EBPs) and its potential application in children's services in European countries. It outlines relevant aspects of the European context, including a tendency to be skeptical about programmes imported from the US, and the need for a pan-European source of information about EBPs across multiple outcome areas. It then describes the standards of evidence used by Blueprints, which cover intervention specificity, evaluation quality, intervention impact, and dissemination readiness. The criteria for determining that a programme is ‘Model’ and ‘Promising’ are outlined. The article then summarizes the process by which the standards were developed and some of the issues that were harder to resolve. It also sketches the process by which a programme reaches the Blueprints database, and provides three examples of programmes approved by Blueprints and implemented in Europe: a home-visiting programme for mothers of infants; a parent skills training programme; and a therapeutic intervention for families of chronic offenders. A brief indication is also given of how the wider pool of programmes reviewed fare against the standards of evidence. Finally, the article summarizes future directions for the work, with a particular emphasis on how Blueprints might become widely used in Europe.

Keywords:
child well-being
Europe
evidence-based program
program evaluation
Resumen

En el artículo se describe la base de datos de Blueprints de programas basados en la evidencia (PBE's) y su aplicación potencial en servicios de atención a la infancia en los países europeos. Se abordan los aspectos relevantes del contexto europeo, y se señala una cierta tendencia al escepticismo ante programas importados de los EEUU, así como la necesidad de una fuente de información paneuropea sobre PBE's en todas las áreas de resultados. A continuación, se describen los criterios de evidencia empleados en los Blueprints, tales como la especificidad de la intervención, la calidad de la evaluación, el impacto de la intervención y la disponibilidad del sistema. Se examinan los criterios que se siguen para que un programa sea considerado como ‘Modelo’ y ‘Prometedor’. A continuación, se resume el proceso mediante el que se desarrollaron los criterios y algunos de los aspectos de más difícil resolución. También se describen las líneas generales del proceso de incorporación de un programa a la base de datos de Blueprints, y proporciona tres ejemplos de programas aprobados por los Blueprints e implementados en Europa: un programa de visitas a domicilio a las madres de menores, un programa de entrenamiento de habilidades parentales, y una intervención terapéutica en familias de delincuentes reincidentes. También se indica brevemente que la mayor parte de programas revisados no cumple con los criterios de evidencia. Finalmente, el artículo resume las orientaciones futuras de trabajo en este campo, con especial énfasis en las distintas estrategias para extender el uso de Blueprints por toda Europa.

Palabras clave:
bienestar infantil
Europa
evaluación del programa
programa basado en la evidencia
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[Aos et al., 2011]
S. Aos, S. Lee, E. Drake, A. Pennucci, T. Klima, Miller, M. Burley.
Return on investment: Evidencebased options to improve statewide outcomes Document No. 11-07-1201.
Washington State Institute for Public Policy, (2011),
[Atria and Spiel, 2007]
M. Atria, C. Spiel.
The Viennese Social Competence (ViSC) training for students: Program and evaluation.
Bullying, victimization and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention, pp. 179-198
[Axford and Morpeth, 2012]
N. Axford, L. Morpeth.
The Common Language prevention operating system: from strategy development to implementation of evidence-based practice.
Handbook of Implementation Science for Educational Psychology,
[Barth et al., 2012]
R.P. Barth, B.R. Lee, M.A. Lindsey, K.S. Collins, F. Strieder, B.F. Chorpita, J.A. Sparks.
Evidence-based practice at a crossroads: The emergence of common elements and factors.
Research on Social Work Practice, 22 (2012), pp. 108-119
[Bumbarger and Perkins, 2008]
B.K. Bumbarger, D.F. Perkins.
After randomised trials: issues related to the dissemination of evidence-based interventions.
Journal of Children's Services, 3 (2008), pp. 55-64
[Butler et al., 2011]
S. Butler, G. Baruch, N. Hickey, P. Fonagy.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Multisystemic Therapy and a statutory therapeutic intervention for young offenders.
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 50 (2011), pp. 1220-1235
[Eckenrode et al., 2010]
J. Eckenrode, M. Campa, D.W. Luckey, C.R. Henderson, R. Cole, H. Kitzman, D. Olds.
Long-term effects of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on the life course of youths: 19-year follow-up of a randomized trial.
Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medical, 164 (2010), pp. 9-15
[Eisner, 2009]
M. Eisner.
No effects in independent prevention trials: can we reject the cynics’ hypothesis?.
Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5 (2009), pp. 163-183
[Elliott, 2010]
D.S. Elliott.
Lessons from Columbine: effective school-based violence prevention strategies and programmes.
Journal of Children's Services, 4 (2010), pp. 53-62
[Faggiano et al., 2008]
F. Faggiano, M.R. Galanti, K. Bohrn, G. Burkhart, F. Vigna- Taglianti, L. Cuomo, G. Wiborg, EU-Dap Study Group.
The effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: EU-Dap cluster randomised controlled trial.
Preventive Medicine, 47 (2008), pp. 537-543
[Flay et al., 2005]
B.R. Flay, A. Biglan, R.F. Boruch, F.G. Castro, D. Gottfredson, S. Kellam, J.I. Peter.
Standards of Evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination.
Prevention Science, 6 (2005), pp. 151-175
[Grietens, 2010]
H. Grietens.
Discerning European perspectives on evidence-based interventions for vulnerable children and their families.
International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 13 (2010), pp. 6-17
[Hawkins and Catalano, 2002]
J.D. Hawkins, R.F. Catalano.
Communities that Care - Tools for Community Leaders: A Guidebook for Getting Started.
Channing-Bete, (2002),
[Henggeler et al., 1992]
S.W. Henggeler, G.B. Melton, L.A. Smith.
Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: An effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 6 (1992), pp. 953-961
[Henggeler et al., 2002]
S.W. Henggeler, W.G. Clingempeel, M.J. Brondino, S.G. Pickrel.
Four-year follow-up of multisystemic therapy with substance-abusing and substance-dependent juvenile offenders.
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41 (2002), pp. 868-874
[Hutchings et al., 2007]
J. Hutchings, T. Bywater, D. Daley, F. Gardner, K. Jones, C. Eames, C. Whitaker.
A pragmatic randomised control trial of a parenting intervention in sure start services for children at risk of developing conduct disorder.
British Medical Journal, 334 (2007), pp. 678-682
[Larsson. et al., 2009]
B. Larsson, B. Fossum, G. Clifford, M. Drugli, B. Handegard, W. Morch.
Treatment of oppositional defiant and conduct problems in young Norwegian children: results of a randomized controlled trial.
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 18 (2009), pp. 42-52
[Lee et al., 2012]
S. Lee, E. Drake, A. Pennucci, G. Bjornstad, T. Edovald.
Economic evaluation of early childhood education in a policy context.
Journal of Children's Services, 7 (2012), pp. 53-63
[Little, 2010]
M. Little.
Proof Positive.
Demos, (2010),
[Little, 2012]
M. Little.
From Innovation to Proven Model.
Social Research Unit, (2012),
[McGilloway et al., 2012]
S. McGilloway, G. Mhaille, T. Bywater, M. Furlong, Y. Leckey, P. Kelly, M. Donnelly.
A parenting intervention for childhood behavioural problems: A randomized controlled trial in disadvantaged communitybased settings.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80 (2012), pp. 116-127
[Olds et al., 1986]
D.L. Olds, C.R. Henderson, R. Chamberlin, R. Tatelbaum.
Preventing child abuse and neglect: A randomized trial of nurse home visitation.
Pediatrics, 78 (1986), pp. 65-78
[Olds and Kitzman, 1990]
D.L. Olds, H. Kitzman.
Can home visitation improve the health of women and children at environmental risk?.
Pediatrics, 86 (1990), pp. 108-116
[Petrie et al., 2006]
P. Petrie, J. Boddy, C. Cameron, V. Wigfall, A. Simon.
Working with children in care: European perspectives.
Open University Press, (2006),
[Rowlands, 2010]
J. Rowlands.
Services are not enough: child wellbeing in a very unequal society.
Journal of Children's Services, 5 (2010), pp. 80-88
[Salmivalli et al., 2011]
C. Salmivalli, A. Kärnä, E. Poskiparta.
Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied.
International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35 (2011), pp. 405-411
[Social Research Unit, 2012a]
Social Research Unit.
An introduction to evidencebased programmes in children's services.
Dartington: Social Research Unit, (2012),
[Social Research Unit, 2012b]
Social Research Unit.
Investing in Children: Youth Justice 1. 1.
SRU, (2012),
[Scott et al., 2010]
S. Scott, T.G. O’Connor, A. Futh, C. Matias, J. Price, M. Doolan.
Impact of a parenting program in a high-risk, multi-ethnic community: The PALS trial.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 51 (2010), pp. 1331-1341
[Soydan et al., 2010]
H. Soydan, E.J. Mullen, L. Alexandra, J. Rehnman, Y.P. Li.
Evidence-based clearinghouses in social work.
Research on Social Work Practice, 20 (2010), pp. 690-700
[Sundell et al., 2008]
K. Sundell, K. Hansson, C.A. Lofholm, T. Olsson, L.H. Gustle, C. Kadesjo.
The transportability of Multisystemic Therapy to Sweden: Short-Term results from a randomized trial of conduct-disordered youths.
Journal of Family Psychology, 22 (2008), pp. 550-560
[Timmons-Mitchell et al., 2006]
J. Timmons-Mitchell, M. Bender, M.A. Kishna, C. Mitchell.
An independent effectiveness trial of Multisystemic Therapy with juvenile justice youth. Journal of Clinical Child and.
Adolescent Psychology, 35 (2006), pp. 227-236
[Webster-Stratton et al., 1988]
C. Webster-Stratton, M. Kolpacoff, T. Hollinsworth.
Self-administered videotape therapy for families with conduct-problem children: Comparison with two cost-effective treatments and a control group.
Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 56 (1988), pp. 558-566

Versión en castellano disponible en [spanish version available at]: www.psyshosocial-intervention.org

Copyright © 2012. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas