metricas
covid
European Journal of Psychiatry Screening time for delirium in dementia patients matters: Validation of the Span...
Journal Information
Vol. 39. Issue 2.
(April - June 2025)
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 39. Issue 2.
(April - June 2025)
Original article
Screening time for delirium in dementia patients matters: Validation of the Spanish version of the RADAR
Esteban Sepúlvedaa,b,c,d,
Corresponding author
esteban.sepulveda@urv.cat

Corresponding author at: Hospital Universitari Institut Pere Mata, C/ de l'Insitut Pere Mata, S/N, 43206 Reus, Spain.
, Ester Bermúdeza,b,c, Lourdes Vallinotoa, Julia Sáncheza, Paola Sauraa, Pau Pianya, Eva Viñuelasa, Marta Ciutata, José Palmaa, Imma Graua, Elisabet Vilellaa,b,c,d, Philippe Voyere, José G. Francof
a Hospital Universitari Institut Pere Mata, C/ de l'Insitut Pere Mata, S/N, 43206 Reus, Spain
b Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Carrer de Sant Llorenç, 21, 43201 Reus, Spain
c Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili-CERCA, Reus, Spain
d CIBER de Salud Mental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, C/ Monforte de Lemos 3-5. Pabellón 11. Planta 0, 28029 Madrid, Spain
e Université Laval, Faculté des sciences infirmières, Pavillon Ferdinand Vandry, 1050 Avenue de La Médecine, Québec (Québec) G1V 0A6, Canada
f Grupo de Investigación en Psiquiatría de Enlace (GIPE), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Campus Laureles de la UPB, Bloque 11, Facultad de Medicina, CP 050031, Medellín, Colombia
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (4)
Table 1. Clinical and demographic variables of the 34 patients with dementia, differentiated by the presence or absence of delirium according to a cut-off score ≤6 on the DDT-Pro. The results are reported as frequencies (percentages) for discrete variables and means ± standard deviations for continuous variables.
Tables
Table 2. The frequency of positivity or moderate to severe impairment for each item of the DDT-Pro in 34 patients according to the diagnosis of delirium.
Tables
Table 3. Validity of the RADAR for the diagnosis of delirium according to the DDT-Pro. Data are reported for each of the two assessments and for both (Total). Values are shown with 95 % confidence intervals in parentheses for the DDT-Pro cut-off scores ≤6 (delirium) and ≤7 (SSD and delirium).
Tables
Table 4. Correspondence analysis of the RADAR and its items with the delirium diagnosis according to the reference standard, DDT-Pro ≤6 cutoff. Analyses correspond to both the midday and morning RADAR assessments and all their dimensional solutions were one dimensional. Since the midday performance was the best, it is reported first. The model for item 1 (drowsiness) had the lower inertia and was not significant. The models for the other items and for the whole RADAR were significant, with item 2 (following instructions) and the whole RADAR models having the higher inertias. Positive rather than negative response to any item or for the RADAR explained most of the dimension inertia, with item positivity for item having the highest explained inertia among the midday significant models.
Tables
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Background and objectives

Delirium is frequently underdiagnosed in patients with dementia. The Repérage Actif du Delirium Adapté à la Routine (RADAR) can be adapted to nursing routines for delirium screening. We validated the Spanish RADAR version and determined the best time of day for its administration.

Methods

All dementia patients admitted to a postacute care centre on one day were independently assessed by nurses using the RADAR at the morning and midday and by geriatricians with the Delirium Diagnostic Tool-Provisional (DDT-Pro) reference standard for delirium and subsyndromal delirium (SSD). We evaluated the test–retest temporal stability of the morning and midday RADAR assessments, the RADAR validity considering these two time points and then, the suitability of the DDT-Pro for diagnostic confirmation.

Results

Of 34 dementia patients included, 47.1 % had delirium, and 83.3 % had behavioural, mental or neurological disturbances that made diagnostic assessment difficult. The test–retest temporal stability of the RADAR was moderate, which is consistent with the fact that the diagnostic accuracy of the midday assessment for delirium (79.4 %) was better than that of the morning (73.5 %). The screening accuracy when also considering SSD, accounting for either assessment time, was 79.4 %. Several correspondence and correlation analyses support the use of DDT-Pro for confirmation and assessment of delirium severity after RADAR screening.

Conclusion

The RADAR is useful for the screening of delirium and SSD by nurses in dementia patients and midday assessments have greater diagnostic validity than morning assessments. Screened patients need subsequent diagnosis confirmation before starting therapeutic measures.

Keywords:
Delirium
Dementia
Diagnosis
Postacute care
Elderly
Nursing

Article

These are the options to access the full texts of the publication European Journal of Psychiatry
Subscriber
Subscriber

If you already have your login data, please click here .

If you have forgotten your password you can you can recover it by clicking here and selecting the option “I have forgotten my password”
Purchase
Purchase article

Purchasing article the PDF version will be downloaded

Purchase now
Contact
Phone for subscriptions and reporting of errors
From Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. (GMT + 1) except for the months of July and August which will be from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Calls from Spain
932 415 960
Calls from outside Spain
+34 932 415 960
E-mail
Article options
Tools