Información del artículo
Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio es el análisis de las relaciones entre la complejidad del conocimiento y el sostenimiento de ventajas competitivas, a través de la construcción de barreras a la imitación y a la sustitución de las capacidades. El tratamiento teórico de la complejidad y el análisis independiente de la imitabilidad y la sustituibilidad de los activos tecnológicos han permitido avanzar en el estudio de estas relaciones. Los resultados del estudio empírico, realizado en una muestra de empresas de biotecnología españolas, indican que la complejidad protege las capacidades de su imitación. Sin embargo, una excesiva proporción de conocimiento tácito complejo puede tener efectos contraproducentes en la construcción de barreras a la sustitución, al generar desconfianza entre distintos agentes y fomentar que la competencia busque tecnologías alternativas más apreciadas en los mercados.
Palabras clave:
Capacidades tecnológicas
complejidad del conocimiento
sostenimiento de ventajas competitivas
Abstract
The aim of this paper is the analysis of the relationships between knowledge complexity and technology-based competitive advantage sustainability in terms of its barriers to imitation and substitution. The theoretical treatment of complexity construct and the separated analysis of imitability and substitutability of technological assets are the most interesting issues to improve our understanding on this research area. The empirical evidence from a sample of Spanish biotech companies indicates that complex capabilities are the ones more protected from imitation. With respect to barriers to substitution, results show that an excessive proportion of complex tacit knowledge may have a negative influence on sustaining competitive advantage, as it reduces confidence on this technology among interested agents, promoting competitors looking for other more attractive ones.
Keywords:
Technological capabilites
complexity of knowledge
maintenance of competitive advantages
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Referencias bibliográficas
[Adler and Shenhar, 1990]
P.S. Adler, F.R. Shenhar.
Adapting your technological base: the organizational challenge.
Sloan Management Review, vol. 25 (1990), pp. 37-52
[Afuah, 2002]
A. Afuah.
Mapping technological capabilities into product markets and competitive advantage: The case of cholesterol drugs.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 23 (2002), pp. 171-179
[Alegre et al., 2006]
J. Alegre, R. Chiva, R. Lapiedra.
La innovación de productos en el sector cerámico: Un análisis de las empresas más innovadoras y menos innovadoras.
Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 15 (2006), pp. 55-68
[Amit and Schoemaker, 1993]
T.R. Amit, P.J.H. Schoemaker.
Strategic assets and organizational rent.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14 (1993), pp. 33-46
[Anderson et al., 1988]
P.W. Anderson, K.J. Arrow, D. Pines.
The economy as a complex evolving system.
Ed. Addison-Wesley, (1988),
[ASEBIO, 2002]
ASEBIO.
Informe Asebio 2002.
Ed. Asociación Española de Bioempresas, (2002),
[Balconi, 2002]
M. Balconi.
Tacitness, codification of technological knowledge, and the organisation of industry.
Research Policy, vol 31 (2002), pp. 357-379
[Barney, 1991]
J.B. Barney.
Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage.
Journal of Management, vol. 17 (1991), pp. 99-120
[Barney, 1992]
J.B. Barney.
Integrating organizational behavior and strategy formulation research: A resource-based analysis.
Advances in strategic management,
[Barney, 1997]
J.B. Barney.
Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage.
Ed. Addison-Wesley, (1997),
[Black and Boal, 1994]
J.A. Black, K.B. Boal.
Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage.
Strategic Management Journal, vol 15 (1994), pp. 131-148
[Bowman and Ambrosini, 2003]
C. Bowman, V. Ambrosini.
How the resource-based and de dynamic capabilities views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy.
British Journal of Management, vol. 14 (2003), pp. 289-303
[Christensen, 1996]
J.F. Christensen.
Analysing the technology base of the firm: A multidimensional resource and competence perspective.
Towards a competence theory of the firm,
[Comanor and Scherer, 1969]
W.S. Comanor, F.M. Scherer.
Patents statistics as a measure of technical change.
Journal of Political Economy, vol. 77 (1969), pp. 392-398
[Conner, 1995]
K.R. Conner.
Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: When can encouraging ‘clones’ pay?.
Management Science, vol. 41 (1995), pp. 209-225
[COTEC, 1997]
COTEC.
Biotecnología. Documentos COTEC sobre oportunidades tecnológicas.
Ed. Fundación Cotec, (1997),
[Cowan and Foray, 1997]
R. Cowan, D. Foray.
The economics of codification and the diffusion of knowledge.
Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 6 (1997), pp. 595-622
[Crossan and Berdrow, 2003]
M.M. Crossan, I. Berdrow.
Organizational learning and strategic renewal.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24 (2003), pp. 1087-1105
[De Carolis, 2003]
D.M. De Carolis.
Competences and imitability in the pharmaceutical industry: An analysis of their relationship with wirm performance.
Journal of Management, vol. 29 (2003), pp. 27-50
[Díaz Díaz et al., 2006]
N.L. Díaz Díaz, I. Aguiar Díaz, P. De Saá Pérez.
El conocimiento organizativo tecnológico y la capacidad de innovación. Evidencia para la empresa industrial española.
Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, (2006), pp. 33-60
[Dierickx and Cool, 1989]
I. Dierickx, K. Cool.
Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage.
Management Science, vol. 35 (1989), pp. 1504-1511
[Dosi and Marengo, 1993]
G. Dosi, L. Marengo.
Some elements of an evolutionary theory of organizational competences.
Evolutionary concepts in contemporary economics,
[Douglas and Ryman, 2003]
T.J. Douglas, J.A. Ryman.
Understanding competitive advantage in the general hospitaliIndustry: Evaluating strategic competencies.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24 (2003), pp. 333-347
[Ernst, 1995]
B. Ernst.
The principle of hope.
Ed. MIT Press, (1995),
[Ernst, 2001]
H. Ernst.
Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: Evidence from time-series cross section analyses on the firm level.
Research Policy, vol. 30 (2001), pp. 143-158
[Figueiredo, 2002]
P.N. Figueiredo.
Does technological learning pay off? inter-firm differences in technological capability-accumulation paths and operational performance improvement.
Research Policy, vol. 31 (2002), pp. 73-94
[Fuentelsaz et al., 2003]
L. Fuentelsaz, J. Gómez, Y. Polo.
Intrafirm diffusion of new technologies: An empirical application.
Research Policy, vol. 32 (2003), pp. 533-551
[García Muiña et al., 2006]
F.E. García Muiña, G. Martín de Castro, P. López Sáez, J.E. Navas López.
The complexity in technological capabilities: evidence from spanish biotechnological firms.
International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 35 (2006), pp. 224-240
[García Muiña and Navas López, 2007]
F.E. García Muiña, J.E. Navas López.
Las capacidades tecnológicas y los resultados empresariales. Un estudio empírico en el sector biotecnológico español.
Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, (2007), pp. 169-202
[Ghemawat, 1991]
P. Ghemawat.
Market incumbency and technological inertia.
Marketing Science, vol. 10 (1991), pp. 161-171
[Godfrey and Hill, 1995]
P.C. Godfrey, C.W.L. Hill.
The Problem of Unobservable in Strategic Management Research.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 16 (1995), pp. 519-533
[González Álvarez and Nieto Antolín, 2005]
N. González Álvarez, M. Nieto Antolín.
Efectos de la ambigüedad causal sobre los resultados empresariales: Un análisis en las mayores empresas manufactureras españolas.
Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, (2005), pp. 83-102
[Grant, 1991]
R.M. Grant.
The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation.
California Management Review, vol. 34 (1991), pp. 114-135
[Grant, 1996]
R.M. Grant.
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17 (1996), pp. 109-122
[Griliches, 1990]
Z. Griliches.
Patents statistics as economic indicators: Asurvey.
Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 28 (1990), pp. 1661-1707
[Griliches et al., 1991]
Z. Griliches, B.H. Hall, A. Pakes.
R&D, patents, and market value revisited: Is there a second (technological opportunity) factor?.
Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 1 (1991), pp. 1183-1201
[Gunby, 1996]
Gunby, P. (1996), Explaining adoption patterns of process standards, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Ontario.
[Hall, 1992]
R. Hall.
The strategic analysis of intangible resources.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13 (1992), pp. 135-144
[Helfat, 2000]
C.E. Helfat.
Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: The evolution of firm capabilities.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21 (2000), pp. 955-959
[Henderson and Cockburn, 1994]
R.M. Henderson, I. Cockburn.
Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical Research.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 15 (1994), pp. 63-84
[Hirshleifer, 1982]
J. Hirshleifer.
Evolutionary models in economics and law: Cooperation versus conflict.
Research in Law and Economics, vol. 4 (1982), pp. 1-60
[Holland and Miller, 1991]
J.H. Holland, J.H. Miller.
Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory.
American Economic Review, vol. 81 (1991), pp. 365-370
[Hoskisson et al., 1999]
R. Hoskisson, M.A. Hitt, W.P. Wan, D. Yiu.
Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum.
Journal of Management, vol. 25 (1999), pp. 417-456
[Huberman and Hogg, 1986]
B.A. Huberman, T. Hogg.
Complexity and adaptation.
Physica, vol. 22 (1986), pp. 376-384
[Jiménez Jiménez and Sanz Valle, 2006]
D. Jiménez Jiménez, R. Sanz Valle.
Innovación, aprendizaje organizativo y resultados empresariales. Un estudio empírico.
Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, (2006), pp. 31-56
[Knott, 2003]
A.M. Knott.
Persistent heterogeneity and sustainable innovation.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24 (2003), pp. 687-705
[Liebeskind, 1996]
J.P. Liebeskind.
Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm.
Strategic Management Journal, vol 17 (1996), pp. 93-107
[Liebeskind, 1996a]
J.P. Liebeskind.
Keeping organizational secrets: Protective institutional mechanisms and their costs.
Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 3 (1996), pp. 623-663
[Lippman and Rumelt, 1982]
S.A. Lippman, R.P. Rumelt.
Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition.
Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 13 (1982), pp. 418-438
[Lippman and Rumelt, 2003]
S.A. Lippman, R.P. Rumelt.
A bargaining perspective on resource advantage.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24 (2003), pp. 1069-1086
[Makadok, 2003]
R. Makadok.
Doing the right thing and knowing the right thing to do: why the whole is greater than the sum of parts.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24 (2003), pp. 1043-1055
[MacMillan et al., 1985]
I. MacMillan, M. McCaffery, G. VanWijk.
Competitors’responses to easily imitated new products: exploring commercial banking product introductions.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 6 (1985), pp. 75-86
[Markman et al., 2004]
G.D. Markman, M.I. Espina, P.H. Phan.
Patents as surrogates for inimitable and non-Substitutable resources.
Journal of Management, vol. 30 (2004), pp. 529-544
[McEvily and Chakravarthy, 2002]
S.K. McEvily, B. Chakravarthy.
The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 23 (2002), pp. 285-305
[McEvily et al., 2000]
S.K. McEvily, S. Das, K. McAbe.
Avoiding competence substitution through knowledge sharing.
Academy of Management Review, vol. 25 (2000), pp. 294-311
[Miller and Shamsie, 1996]
D. Miller, J. Shamsie.
The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood films studios from 1936 to 1965.
Academy of Management Journal, vol. 39 (1996), pp. 519-543
[McGrath et al., 1995]
R.G. McGrath, I.C. MacMillan, S. Venkataraman.
Defining and developing competence: Astrategic process paradigm.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 16 (1995), pp. 251-275
[Miller et al., 2002]
D. Miller, R. Eisenstat, N. Foote.
Strategy from the inside out: Building capabilities-creating organizations.
California Management Review, vol. 44 (2002), pp. 37-54
[Nelson and Winter, 1982]
R.R. Nelson, S.G. Winter.
An evolutionary theory of economic change.
Ed. Belknap Press, (1982),
[Nicholls-Nixon and Woo, 2003]
C.L. Nicholls-Nixon, C.Y. Woo.
Technology sourcing and output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24 (2003), pp. 651-666
[NietoAntolín and Pérez Cano, 2006]
M. NietoAntolín, C. Pérez Cano.
Características del conocimiento tecnológico y mecanismos de apropación de innovaciones.
Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 15 (2006), pp. 93-106
[Nieto Antolín and Quevedo Cano, 2005]
M. Nieto Antolín, P. Quevedo Cano.
Variables estructurales, capacidad de absorción y esfuerzo innovador en las empresas manufactureras españolas.
Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol 14 (2005), pp. 25-44
[Nonaka, 1994]
I. Nonaka.
A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation.
Organization Science, vol. 5 (1994), pp. 14-37
[Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995]
I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi.
The knowledge-creating company.
Ed. Oxford University Press, (1995),
[Penrose, 1959]
E.T. Penrose.
The theory of growth of the firm.
Ed. Basil Blackwell, (1959),
[Peteraf, 1993]
M.A. Peteraf.
The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resourcebased view.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14 (1993), pp. 179-191
[Peteraf and Bergen, 2003]
M.A. Peteraf, M.E. Bergen.
Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: A market-based and resource-based framework.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24 (2003), pp. 1027-1041
[Prahalad and Hamel, 1990]
C.K. Prahalad, G. Hamel.
The core competence of the corporation.
Harvard Business Review, (1990), pp. 79-91
[Reed and DeFillipi, 1990]
R. Reed, R. DeFillipi.
Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage.
Academy of Management Review, vol 15 (1990), pp. 88-102
[Rivette and Kline, 2000]
K.G. Rivette, D. Kline.
Rembrandts in the attic: Unlocking the hidden value of patents.
Ed. Harvard Business School Press, (2000),
[Robins, 1992]
J.A. Robins.
Organizational considerations in the evaluation of capital assets: Toward a resource-based view of strategic investment by firms.
Organization Science, vol. 3 (1992), pp. 522-536
[Rogers, 1995]
E. Rogers.
Diffusions of Innovation.
Ed. Free Press, (1995),
[Ruiz-MayaPérez and Martín Pliego, 1995]
L. Ruiz-MayaPérez, F.J. Martín Pliego.
Estadística II: Inferencia.
Ed. AC, (1995),
[Santarelli and Piergiovanni, 1996]
E. Santarelli, R. Piergiovanni.
Analysing literature-based output indicators: The Italian experience.
Research Policy, vol. 25 (1996), pp. 689-711
[Scherer, 1965]
E.M. Scherer.
Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions.
Innovation and Growth. Schumpeterian Perspectives,
[Selznick, 1957]
P. Selznick.
Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation.
Ed. Harper and Row, (1957),
[Siegel and Castellan, 1988]
S. Siegel, N. Castellan.
Non parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.
Ed McGraw-Hill, (1988),
[Simon, 1947]
H.A. Simon.
Administrative Behavior.
Ed. McMillan, (1947),
[Simon, 1962]
H.A. Simon.
The architecture of complexity.
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 106 (1962), pp. 467-482
[Singh, 1997]
K. Singh.
The impact of technological complexity and interfirm cooperation on business survival.
Academy of Management Journal, vol. 40 (1997), pp. 339-367
[Spencer, 2003]
J.W. Spencer.
Firms’ knowledge sharing strategies in the global innovation system: Empirical evidence from the flat panel display.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24 (2003), pp. 217-233
[Spender, 1996]
J.C. Spender.
Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17 (1996), pp. 45-62
[Styhre, 2004]
A. Styhre.
Rethinking knowledge: Abergsonian critique of the notion of tacit knowledge.
British Journal of Management, vol. 14 (2004), pp. 177-188
[Teece, 1986]
D.J. Teece.
Profiting from technological innovation.
Research Policy, vol. 15 (1986), pp. 285-305
[Teece et al., 1997]
D.J. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen.
Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18 (1997), pp. 509-533
[Teng and Cummings, 2002]
B. Teng, J.L. Cummings.
Trade-offs in managing resources and capabilities.
Academy of Management Executive, vol. 16 (2002), pp. 81-91
[Thomke and Kuemmerle, 2002]
S. Thomke, W. Kuemmerle.
Asset accumulation, interdependence and technological change: evidence from pharmaceutical drug discovery.
Strategic Management Journal, vol 23 (2002), pp. 619-635
[Un and Cuervo-Cazurra, 2004]
C.A. Un, A. Cuervo-Cazurra.
Strategies for knowledge creation in firms.
British Journal of Management, 15 (2004), pp. S27-S41
[Vicente-Lorente, 2001]
J.D. Vicente-Lorente.
Specificity and opacity as resource-based determinants of capital structure: Evidence for Spanish manufacturing firms.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22 (2001), pp. 157-177
[Wang et al., 2004]
Y. Wang, H.P. Lo, Y. Yang.
The constituents of core competencies and firm performance: evidence from high-technology firms in China.
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 21 (2004), pp. 249-280
[Wernerfelt, 1984]
B. Wernerfelt.
Aresource-based view of the firm.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5 (1984), pp. 171-180
[Wiklund and Shepherd, 2003]
J. Wiklund, D. Shepherd.
Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized business.
Strategic Management Journal, vol 24 (2003), pp. 1307-1314
[Wilcox-king and Zeithaml, 2001]
A. Wilcox-king, C.P. Zeithaml.
Competences and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22 (2001), pp. 75-99
[Wonglimpiyarat, 2005]
J. Wonglimpiyarat.
Does complexity affect speed of innovation?.
Technovation, vol. 25 (2005), pp. 865-882
[Zahra and Nielsen, 2002]
S.A. Zahra, A.P. Nielsen.
Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization.
Strategic Management Journal, vol 23 (2002), pp. 377-398
[Zander and Kogut, 1995]
U. Zander, B. Kogut.
Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizacional capabilities: An empirical test.
Organization Science, vol. 6 (1995), pp. 76-92
[Zarraga Oberty and De Saá Pérez, 2005]
C. Zarraga Oberty, P. De Saá Pérez.
Comunidades de práctica: equipos de trabajo para la gestión del conocimiento.
Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 14 (2005), pp. 145-158
[Zott, 2003]
C. Zott.
Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24 (2003), pp. 97-125
Los autores agradecen los comentarios y sugerencias de los evaluadores anónimos, que contribuyeron a la mejora del presente artículo.
Copyright © 2008. ACEDE