Buscar en
Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México
Toda la web
Inicio Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México Risk factors evaluation for urolithiasis among children
Información de la revista
Vol. 73. Núm. 4.
Páginas 228-236 (Julio - Agosto 2016)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
1501
Vol. 73. Núm. 4.
Páginas 228-236 (Julio - Agosto 2016)
Research article
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmhimx.2016.05.006
Open Access
Risk factors evaluation for urolithiasis among children
Evaluación de factores de riesgo para urolitiasis en niños
Visitas
...
Francisco Velásquez-Foreroa,
Autor para correspondencia
fcovelfor@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Mariela Esparzaa, Alejandro Salasb, Mara Medeirosc, Georgina Toussaintc,, Francisco Llachd
a Laboratorio de Metabolismo Mineral Óseo, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico
b Laboratorio de Metabolismo Mineral Óseo, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez; Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital General de México, Mexico City, Mexico
c Laboratorio de Nefrología y Metabolismo Mineral Óseo, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico
d Former Director of Clinical Nephrology and Hypertension. Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (4)
Table 1. Comparison of controls vs. patients results of selected stone-forming risk factors.
Table 2. Main risk factors for urolithiasis observed in children (N=162).
Table 3. Serum and urinary parameters in children with nephrocalcinosis compared to those with urolithiasis.
Table 4. Ca restriction biochemical basal values in fasting urinary and after Ca load in 102 children>5 years.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract
Background

The prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis varies from 0.01–0.03%. Urolithiasis may be caused by anatomical, metabolic and environmental factors. Recurrence varies between 16 to 67%, and it is frequently associated with metabolic abnormalities. The objective of the present work was the identification of risk factors that promote urolithiasis in a child population.

Methods

This study included 162 children with urolithiasis and normal renal function (mean age 7.5 years). Risk factors were investigated in two stages. In the first stage, 24-hour urine, and blood samples were analyzed to assess metabolic parameters and urinary tract infection. During the second stage, the effect of calcium restriction and a calcium load on renal Ca excretion were evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed.

Results

Urolithiasis was observed in 0.02% of children, 50% of them with family history of urinary stones. There were multiple risk factors for urolithiasis including hypocitraturia (70%), hypomagnesuria (42%), hypercalciuria (37%; in 11/102 was by intestinal hyperabsorption, in 13/102 was unclassified. Ca resorption or renal Ca leak were not detected). We also detected alkaline urine (21%), systemic metabolic acidosis (20%), urinary infections (16%), nephrocalcinosis with urolithiasis (11%), oliguria (8%), urinary tract anomalies, hyperuricosemia and hypermagnesemia (7% each one), hypercalcemia (6%), hyperoxaluria (2%) and hypercystinuria (0.61%).

Conclusions

Hypocitraturia and hypomagnesuria were the most frequent risk factors associated with urolithiasis, followed by hypercalciuria. High PTH values were excluded. Children presented two or more risk factors for urolithiasis.

Keywords:
Hypocitraturia
Hypomagnesuria
Hypercalciuria
Pediatric urolithiasis
Systemic metabolic acidosis
Urolithiasis risk factors
Resumen
Introducción

La prevalencia de urolitiasis pediátrica varía de 0.01–0.03%. Las causas de urolitiasis pueden ser anatómicas, metabólicas o ambientales. Las recurrencias varían entre 16 a 67%, y están frecuentemente asociadas con alteraciones metabólicas. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue la identificación de factores de riesgo que promueven la urolitiasis en una población infantil.

Métodos

Se incluyeron 162 niños con urolitiasis y función renal normal, cuya edad media fue de 7.5 años. Los factores de riesgo fueron investigados en dos etapas. En la primera, con la muestras de orina de 24h y sangre, se investigaron parámetros metabólicos e infecciones del tracto urinario. En una segunda etapa se valoró la calciuria, previa restricción seguida de carga de Ca. Los hallazgos fueron analizados estadísticamente.

Resultados

Se presentó urolitiasis en el 0.02% de los niños con historia familiar en el 50%. Se observó hipocitraturia (70%); hipomagnesuria (42%); hipercalciuria (37%; en 11/102 fue por hiperabsorción intestinal; en 13/102 fue inclasificable; no se observó hipercalciuria por resorción o pérdida renal). También se observó orina alcalina (21%); acidosis metabólica sistémica (20%); infecciones urinarias (16%); nefrocalcinosis con urolitiasis (11%); oliguria (8%); anomalías urinarias congénitas, hiperuricosemia e hipermagnesemia (7% cada una); hipercalcemia (6%); hiperoxaluria (2%); e hipercistinuria (0.61%).

Conclusiones

La hipocitraturia e hipomagnesemia fueron los factores de riesgo con mayor frecuencia, seguidos de hipercalciuria. Se excluyeron los valores de hiperparatiroidismo. Los niños exhibieron dos o más factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de urolitiasis.

Palabras clave:
Hipocitraturia
Hipomagnesuria
Hipercalciuria
Urolitiasis pediátrica
Acidosis metabólica sistémica
Factores de riesgo para urolitiasis
Texto completo
1Introduction

Pediatric urinary stone disease occurs infrequently in developed countries. The incidence of hospital admission due to urinary stones varies from 0.01–0.03%.1,2 However, in the United States, there has been an increase from 18.4 cases per 100,000 hospital admissions in 1999 to 57 cases per 100,000 in 2008, with an adjusted annual increase of 10.6% (p>0.001). Thus, the incidence of urinary tract stone disease has increased significantly among adolescents since 1996 during a 25-year period.3,4 Recurrence varies from 16 to 67% and is more frequently present in children with metabolic disorders.5 The site of localization of the stone varies: 66% of stones are found in the renal parenchyma and the rest are located in the ureter, ureterovesical-junction and bladder.6

Factors that enhance stone formation include decreased levels of natural inhibitors of urinary tract stone formation, such as citrate, magnesium, osteopontin,7 pyrophosphate (PPi), calgranulin,8 uromodulin,9 urokinase,10 Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein and albumin.11 In addition, concentrated urine is a risk factor as it favors an increase of salts, resulting in their precipitation.12 Other factors include anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract, metabolic disorders, urinary tract infections, environment and low urine volume.

Urinary tract stones are rarely asymptomatic. Common symptoms include abdominal pain, hematuria and dysuria. Urolithiasis (UL) is observed more frequently in children than in older patients6. A family history of urinary tract stones is present in 20–37% of children but it occurs at all ages.13 Studies suggest that nephrolithiasis (NL) is inherited with a non-Mendelian transmission pattern with multiple genes.14

Some studies have described that renal stones are more frequent in males, but recent studies have mentioned that female children are at higher risk.15 To this day, more than 28 pathogenic factors have been associated with the formation of urinary tract stones; this number is increasing and the frequency changing. Nevertheless, more studies for the evaluation of these factors in the pediatric population are needed. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of urinary tract stones and the pathogenic factors associated with their formation in patients from the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez (HIMFG).

2Patients and methods

This study was conducted according to the recommendations of the World's Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the hospital's Internal Review Board (IRB) and the Ethics Committee. The IRB considered unwise to submit children for the diagnosis of renal tubular acidosis (RTA) because it requires the sampling of arterial blood, neither children<5 years for dietary calcium (Ca) manipulation. Parental written consent and assent of the patient were obtained in all cases.

Our data included 775,230 children evaluated from 2009 to 2014, admitted to the hospital outpatient department. The pediatricians in our urology-nephrology clinic initially diagnosed urinary tract stones in 170 children<17 years of age (mean age 7.5±3.9 years) who were selected to perform this study following the exams according to the research protocol.

Control subjects (170) were also evaluated during this period (2009–2014). Medical charts were reviewed, family history analyzed, and laboratory data collected. Control subjects with normal renal function had a mean age of 8.0±4.7 years. Fifty-two of them (30%) underwent abdominal ultrasound and no UL was found. Blood and urinary biochemical studies were performed and all results were within normal levels. Data of patients with urinary tract stones as compared with controls are included in Table 1.

Table 1.

Comparison of controls vs. patients results of selected stone-forming risk factors.

Blood (mg/dl)  Control
(N=170) 
Patients
(N=162) 
p value 
Ca  9.53±0.68  11.07±0.50 (10)  <0.001 
Mg  2.14±0.31  1.24±0.37 (11)  <0.001 
4.11±0.96  4.67±1.22 (162)  <0.001* 
Creatinine  0.67±0.30  0.68±0.27 (162)  >0.8 
Uric acid  4.0±5.8  7.83±1.06 (11)  <0.001 
Albumin  4.4±0.53  2.3±2.4 (21)  <0.001 
PTH (pg/ml)  33.94±12.70  21.0±13.3 (162)  <0.001* 
Urine (24 h)       
Citrates (mg/24 h)  512.66±183.09  204.33±81.13 (113)  <0.001 
Mg (mg/24 h)  87.64±35.12  23.34±10.55 (70)  <0.001 
UCa/BM
(mgCa/kg/24 h) 
(NV ≤ 4mg/kg/24h)19,20  6.06±2.01 (60)  <0.001 
P (mg/24 h)  651.38±255.84  576.88±116.62 (162)  <0.001* 
Creatinine (mg/24 h)  673.27±655.31  109.2±59.9 (162)  <0.001* 
Uric acid (mg/24 h)  96.04±102.94  141.53±77.92 (162)  <0.001* 
Oxalates (mg/24 h)  15.65±11.58  57.19±6.51 (3)  <0.001 

Values were expressed as mean±SD (n).

PTH, parathyroid hormone; UCa/BM, urinary calcium-body mass relation; NV, normal values.

*

Significant difference but no clinical abnormality (data levels in each children were within the normal range).

2.1Classification criteria

As NL is multifactorial in origin in each children, a minimum scheme diagnostic criteria was used as follows:

Patients (170) were evaluated for urogenital abnormalities, back pain, hematuria, and recurrent urinary tract infections, confirming the diagnosis by ultrasound, plain abdominal X-rays and the spontaneous expulsion of stones. They all resided in Mexico City and the surrounding metropolitan area. A detailed family history suggestive of UL was obtained. The effect of Ca manipulation was evaluated only in children>5 years. Children with abnormal renal function or receiving therapy that altered Ca, phosphorous (P), magnesium (Mg), uric acid (UA), oxalates, or vitamin D were excluded. Patient nutrition was evaluated via Z-scores from body mass index (BMI), considering the following ranges: normal>−1 to<+1; low ≤ −1; overweight ≥+1 to<+2; and obese ≥+2.16

An ambulatory protocol divided into two stages was followed:

The first stage (basal data) included two 24-hour urine samples and one blood sample collection. For urine, volume, Ca, oxalates, Mg, uric acid, Na, K, Cl, citrates, P, creatinine, and cystine levels were quantified and urine samples were cultured. Venous blood samples were analyzed for parathyroid hormone “intact” molecule (PTHi), HCO3, PCO2 and pH, creatinine, Cl, Ca, P, Mg, uric acid, albumin and creatinine clearance.17,18

The second stage included a period of Ca restriction, a fasting urinary sample and another sample of Ca load in 102 children>5 years. The analyses were designed to investigate the origin of hypercalciuria with an indirect assessment of renal handling of Ca after a period of dietary Ca restriction and after a diet Ca load to categorize the hypercalciuria into absorptive, resorptive, renal or unclassified form.18 Dietary Ca restriction phase consisted of a daily reduced Ca diet (50%) for 7–10 days. On the last day, venous blood and urine samples were collected to test the levels of Ca and Pi in urine, and Ca, P and PTH in blood.17,18

Parameters were classified as follows:

  • Calciuria. Normal levels of urinary Ca were obtained from international data for children (normal values ≤4mg Ca/kg/24h).19,20 Ca levels were measured in controls and patients with anatomic absorption spectrophotometry.

    • Renal hypercalciuria. A “fasting urinary sample” was obtained from children with hypercalciuria on a restricted diet 2h after the end of the Ca restriction phase. Abnormal fasting urinary Ca on the restricted diet is defined by UCa x SCr/UCr ≥ 0.11mg/Ca/dlGF (where UCa stands for urinary Ca, SCr for serum creatinine, and UCr for urinary creatinine in mg/dl of glomerular filtrate), accompanied by normocalcemia, normophosphatemia and elevated serum PTH. In this situation, a restricted renal tubular reabsorption of calcium is suggested.18

    • Absorptive hypercalciuria (dietary Ca load phase). Patients with hypercalciuria after Ca restricted diet, with normal “fasting urinary Ca” (< 0.11mg/dlGF) were administered 1g of Ca (2 tablets, 500mg each one). Four hours later, a urine sample was obtained for UCa and UCr levels measurement. An increase in urinary Ca after the Ca load is defined by UCa/UCr ≥ 0.20 mgCa/mg creatinine, accompanied by normocalcemia, normophosphatemia, and normal PTH. An increased calcium intestinal absorption is suggested.18

    • Resorptive hypercalciuria. It occurs if an increased bone turnover leads to urinary loss of bone Ca by primary hyperparathyroidism. Hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria and high serum levels of PTH are present.17,18

    • Unclassified hypercalciuria. Hypercalciuria on the restricted diet that cannot be categorized into absorptive, resorptive or renal form is considered as unclassified.18

  • Hypocitraturia. Urinary citrate was measured with a commercial kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, USA), based on citric conversion to oxaloacetate and the liberation of NADH+H, which is equivalent to the amount of citrate21 (normal levels from the controls were ≥ 306mg/24h).

  • Hypomagnesuria. Urinary Mg was measured using an atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Hypomagnesuria is determined by levels<50mg/d on a random diet, and the absence of a gastrointestinal disorder.22

  • Systemic metabolic acidosis. It was determined with a gasometer (GEM Premier 3000), recognized by the co-occurrence of blood acidemia (pH<7.40, low serum bicarbonate concentration<20 mEq/l and PCO2>34mmHg in children<2 years. For children>2 years, values are pH<7.39, low serum bicarbonate concentration<22 mEq/l and PCO2>37mmHg).23

  • Low urinary volume. Urinary samples were assessed for volume in ml/m2 (oliguria ≤ 300ml/m2 per 24h).24

  • Urinary pH. Urinary pH is simple a measure of free H+ions in urine. It was measured with an electrode: pH values ≥ 6.5 for alkaline urine, and pH ≤ 5.518 for acid urine.

  • Hyperuricosuria. Hyperuricosuria is defined as the urinary excretion of uric acid>600mg/d (measured by enzymatic spectrophotometry procedures), and urinary pH ≥ 5.5.18

  • Hyperoxaluria. It was determined with an oxalate kit purchased from Trinity Biotech (Berkeley Heights, NJ) based on the oxidation of oxalate by oxalate oxidase, followed by the measurement of hydrogen peroxide by oxalate oxidase and a peroxidase-catalyzed reaction (hyperoxaluria>45mg/d).25,26

  • Nephrocalcinosis (NC) and renal calculi. The presence of calcifications in the renal parenchyma (NC) or located within the collecting system (UL) were identified by ultrasound or X-ray. NC and UL may occur simultaneously or individually. NC can be diagnosed mainly when increased echogenicity appears in the renal medulla.27,28 Familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis is an autosomal recessive tissue disorder.

  • Urinary tract infection. Chronic urinary tract infection may be associated with urease-production bacteria, resulting in alkaline urine, and stones composed of Mg, ammonium and phosphates (struvite stones).29

  • Urinary cystine. It was detected by Sullivan test, with sodium cyanide-naphto-quinone-1-sulfonate (normal values: >60 mg/1.73/m2/day).30

2.2Analytical methods

Urinary Na and K levels were measured by flame photometry, and Cl was determined by colorimetric silver precipitation. Albumin was detected using the bromocresol green method (normal values: 3.5–5.0g/dl).31 The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated by Schwartz formula as follows: eGFR/ml/min1.73m2=kL/SCr (mg/dl), where k is a constant value (0.55 for children and adolescent girls, and 0.7 for adolescent boys), L is the length in cm, and SCr is the serum creatinine levels (normal values:>60ml/min/1.73m2).32

PTHi (normal values: 15.18–53.4 pg/ml) was assessed by radioimmunoassay after labeling with I125 (DiaSorin, Inc., Stillwater, MN, USA)33. Other reagents were obtained from local distributors.

2.3Statistical analysis

Data from control children were analyzed to obtain reference values for biochemical parameters. Means and standard deviations were calculated to fix the cut-off points that defined the abnormal values. Subsequently, patients and controls results were compared using the Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test with a 5% of significance level34. All data were analyzed using SPSS version 18.0.

3Results

During a 5-year period (2009–2014), 775,230 children were admitted to the HIMFG outpatient department. The urology/nephrology team detected the presence of UL in 170 children. Thus, the frequency of UL in a 5-year period was 0.02% (1/4560 consults). From this group, eight children were excluded because the lack of compliance. Finally, 162 children with a mean age of 7.5 years, ranging from 6 months to 17 years were included in the study. Sixty children were<5 years and 102 children were>5 years. There were 127 male (78%), and the gender ratio male/female was 3:1. A family history of calculi in first and second-degree relatives was present in 49.6%. The mean serum creatinine level was 0.70±0.3mg/dl, and the mean creatinine clearance was 109.2±59.9ml/min/1.73m2. The BMI (children Z-score) was normal in 55%, low in 27%, overweight in 13% and obesity in 5% of the children.

Clinical symptoms included abdominal pain (52%), hematuria (36%), urinary tract infection (22%) and dysuria (18%). The diagnosis of UL was confirmed by renal ultrasonography in 60%, by spontaneous expulsion in 30%, and by plain abdominal X-ray in 10%. The distribution of the stones was pyelocaliceal (52%), ureteral (7%), bladder (8%), or urethra (3%).

Table 1 includes basal serum and urinary values from the 162 patients as compared with controls. Significant changes (p<0.001) were observed for serum Ca in 10 patients; for serum uric acid, and Mg levels in 11 patients, as well as for albumin in 21 subjects. P, creatinine and basal serum PTHi levels were within the normal levels. In urine, we observed low citrate levels in 113 children; low Mg levels in 70 children; hypercalciuria in 60 patients, and significant hyperoxaluria in three patients. Children with normal renal function (170) or lithiasis (162) results exhibited significant differences in blood (P and PTHi) and urine samples (P, creatinine and uric acid), but each one presented laboratory values and clinical behavior within the normal limits.

The frequency of the main risk factors was observed as follows: hypocitraturia in 70%, hypomagnesuria in 43%, and hypercalciuria in 37%. Alkaline urine was present in 21% of the patients; acid urine in 20% and systemic metabolic acidosis in 33 children (10 children<2 years and 23 children>2 years). Urinary tract infection (UTI) was noticed in 26/162 children (16%) (Table 2). Fourteen children had positive urine cultures for E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus, and 12 children for Proteus sp, Klebsiella sp, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. UL with NC was noted by ultrasound and with plain abdominal X-rays in 18 children (11%) (Table 2), from which none presented hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and NC (Table 3). Ca deposits were predominantly localized in the medullary region and the stones in the collecting tubes. Oliguria was noticed in 8% of these patients; congenital urinary malformations, hyperuricosemia and hypomagnesemia in 7% each; basal hypercalcemia in 6%; hyperoxaluria in 2%; and hypercystinuria in 0.61% (Table 2).

Table 2.

Main risk factors for urolithiasis observed in children (N=162).

 
Hypocitraturia  113  70 
Hypomagnesuria  70  43 
Hypercalciuria  60  37 
Ca intestinal hyperabsorption
(102 children>5 years) 
11  11 
Unclassified hypercalciuria
(102 children>5 years) 
13  13 
Alkaline urine  34  21 
Acid urine  33  20 
Systemic metabolic acidosis  33  20 
Urinary tract infection  26  16 
Nephrocalcinosis with urolithiasis  18  11 
Oliguria  14 
Congenital urinary malformations  11 
Hyperuricosemia  11 
Hypomagnesemia  11 
Basal hypercalcemia  10 
Hyperoxaluria 
Hypercystinuria  0.61 
Table 3.

Serum and urinary parameters in children with nephrocalcinosis compared to those with urolithiasis.

  Nephrocalcinosis (n=18)  Urolithiasis
(n=162) 
p 
Serum Ca (mg/dl)  9.3±1.19  9.24±0.68  0.73 
Serum P (mg/dl)  4.3±0.68  4.8±1.20  0.013 
Serum albumin (mg/dl)  4.4±0.53  2.3±2.4  <0.001* 
Serum PTH (pg/dl)  16.6±9.7  18.3±11.7  0.61 
UCa/BM (mgCa/kg/24 h)  2.0±1.73  2.6±2.6  0.35 
Citric acid (mg/24 h)  148.2±112.3  217.02±319.8  0.96 
Urinary pH  6.3±1.21  6.3±0.92  0.09 
Hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria  none   
Premature children  No history   

PTH, parathyroid hormone; UCa/BM, urinary calcium-body mass relation.

*

Student's t-test.

On the second stage (dietary Ca restriction), 102 children were evaluated. Basal Ca, Pi and PTHi levels, and levels after Ca restriction were similar. Basal hypercalciuria was observed in 46/102 (45%) from which 20 patients (19.6%) persisted with hypercalciuria after Ca restriction (Table 4). In the fasting urinary example (Ca>0.11mg/dl GF), 13/102 patients exhibited hypercalciuria (12.7%), accompanied by normocalcemia, normophosphatemia and normal PTHi. This findings suggested an unclassified hypercalciuria group (Tables 2 and 4).18 After dietary Ca restriction and Ca load, 11/102 (10.7%) children>5 years exhibited an increase in urinary Ca (Ca>0.20mg/mg creatinine) accompanied by normocalcemia, normophosphatemia and normal PTHi, suggesting a Ca intestinal hyperabsorption (Tables 2 and 4). We did not identify any children with resorptive hypercalciuria, or renal hypercalciuria. All children presented at least two or more risk factors for the urinary tract lithiasis.

Table 4.

Ca restriction biochemical basal values in fasting urinary and after Ca load in 102 children>5 years.

  Serum basal levels  After Ca restriction  p 
Ca  9.18±0.80  9.22±0.82  0.3 
4.68±1.20  4.44±1.24  1.2 
PTHi  17.6±10.5  18.3±11.7  0.5 
  Urine basal levels (N=102)
n (%) 
After Ca restriction
n (%) 
Basal hypercalciuria  46 (45%)  20 (19.6) 
Fasting hypercalciuria (>0.11 mg/dlFG)    13 (12.7) 
Hypercalciuria in loaded Ca (>20 mgCa/mgUCr)    11 (10.7) 
4Discussion

This study examines the risk factors and frequency of UL in patients from the HIMFG in Mexico City. They were evaluated by the urology and nephrology division. In the past, studies emphasized isolated factors as the cause of UL.7,8 In the present study (from a single institution), UL frequency was 0.02%, which is similar to those reported in Spain (0.02%), USA (0.057%) and Iceland (0.098%).1–3 In the present prospective study, more than 28 independent biochemical parameters were evaluated in children>over a 5-year period (2009–2014). Family history of NL was present in 50% of our cases, similar to the percentage reported by NOE, et al. (50%)35 and lower than those reported by Polito, et al. (73%),36 and Spivacow, et al. (79%).6 There were 127 males and 35 females. Male/female ratio was 3:1; other reports have shown that females seem to be at a higher risk.15 It remains unclear whether gender is a risk factor or not.

Obesity, a risk factor recently associated with NL37, was observed in 5% of the children. A tendency to the formation of uric acid stones is reported to be increasing in obese people (metabolic syndrome).38

Hypocitraturia was the most frequent biochemical risk factor identified in 70% of our children (Table 2). Citrate is the most abundant organic anion found in the urine, as well as an important endogenous inhibitor of calcium NL because it binds ionized calcium and reduces calcium saturation preventing the growth of calcium phosphate crystals.39 Some studies show that males present a lower rate of citrate excretion than females, and that citrate excretion rises with age.40 Recently, few authors have mentioned the presence of hypocitraturia in children with UL. However, Tefekli, et al.41 and VanDervoort, et al.42 reported that hypocitraturia is a predominant risk factor in children with UL (61–52%). The main cause and pathogenesis of hypocitraturia is an increase in the renal tubular reabsorption of citrates, in part due to intracellular acidosis and/or a reduced alkaline load.43 In our patients, systemic metabolic acidosis (20%) and acid urine (20%) observed may explain partially the hypocitraturia. Urinary citrate deficiency is characteristic of renal tubular acidosis (RTA), particularly distal RTA (dRTA). The correlation of hypocitraturia with RTA44 was not properly evaluated because samples came from venous blood. High animal-protein diets produce more hydrogen ions that are buffered by calcium released from the bone increasing urinary excretion, which is prone to cause low urinary citrate and stones.45 Chronic diarrhea produces chronic acidosis and may cause low urinary citrate and NL.46 Hypokalemia and potassium deficiency decrease urinary citrate probably by an acid-base effect.46 Thiazide diuretics, often used to lower urinary calcium, decrease citrate excretion, particularly if potassium deficiency is allowed.47 Intensive exercise has also been reported to cause low urinary citrate.48 Chronic renal insufficiency reduces daily citrate excretion; this may be secondary to mild chronic metabolic acidosis.46 All children presented normal renal function. As mentioned before, many patients with calcium NL have low urinary citrate. Although some of these individuals might have unrecognized acid-base problems (chronic diarrhea, high protein diets, or incomplete dRTA), there is no clear reason for the low urinary citrate in others, and the underlying mechanisms are presently unknown. These individuals are considered to have idiopathic hypocitraturia.

Hypomagnesuria was present in 70 children (43%) (Table 2), mostly associated with hypocitraturia. These data are important, since urine magnesium levels are considered as a natural protective factor that inhibit calcium crystal formation.6,39

We observed as well that basal hypercalciuria was present in 60 children (37%), from which 43 (72%) were male. This abnormality was not as frequent as previously reported (40–50%).8,17,18 Naturally occurring inhibitors of calcium crystal formation, anatomical abnormalities, urinary tract infections, environmental factors and low urinary volume enhance the formation of calcium stones. Calcium supersaturation is strongly linked to high urinary calcium excretion.39 Most urinary stones are composed of calcium oxalate or calcium phosphate.49

In the second stage of the analysis, basal serum and urinary Ca before and after dietary Ca restriction in 102 children>5 years were evaluated. Serum Ca and P results were normal in both groups, with no significant differences. Serum PTHi levels did not increase after Ca restriction due to the absence of hyperparathyroidism (Table 4). However, basal urinary Ca assessment exhibited 46/102 children (45%) with hypercalciuria, and 27/46 of them were associated with hypocitraturia. After Ca restriction only 20/102 children (20%) remained with hypercalciuria, and 11 with hypocitraturia as well. The “fasting urinary sample” exhibited hypercalciuria>0.11mg/dlGF in 13/102 of the children (13.0%), suggesting an abnormal handle of renal tubular calcium reabsorption. Nevertheless, this group presented normocalcemia, normophosphatemia and PTH levels in serum were also normal. Therefore, it could not be classified as absorptive, resorptive or renal form of hypercalciuria. Levy, et al. termed this as unclassified hypercalciuria.18 In this group, the excess of PTHi restores serum Ca to normal. Unlike primary hyperparathyroidism, calcemia is normal and the hyperparathyroidism is secondary.17

The assessment of Ca levels on the restricted diet and the post Ca load urine sample revealed high levels of Ca (>0.20mg urinary Ca/mg urinary creatinine) in 11/102 patients (11.0%). Six of them presented hypocitraturia as well, accompanied by normal Ca levels in the fasting urinary sample (>0.11mg/dlGF). It was associated with normocalcemia, normophosphatemia and normal PTH levels, suggestive of intestinal Ca hyperabsorption.18

Alkaline urine (pH ≥ 6.5) was observed in 34/162 children (21%). Alkaline urine has been associated with heterogeneous causes, but are well known as Proteus sp. UTI and alimentary disorders. CaHPO4 urinary stones belong to an elevated urine pH as a common feature.50 Acidemia increases calcium phosphatase release from the bone and reduces tubular reabsorption of these ions. As a consequence, hypercalciuria and hyperphosphaturia favor calcium stone formation and the persistence of alkaline urine.50

We found 33 children (20%) with acidic urine (pH ≤ 5.5) together with hypocitraturia and hypomagnesuria. Disturbances of this system occur as a reduced renal secretion of H+ ions, inducing insufficient ammonium with low urinary pH and promoting uric acid stones formation.50

Systemic metabolic acidosis was observed in 33/162 children (20%). The main focus on this disturbance leading to UL is the low urine pH with uric acid stones formation.38,50 Low urinary pH in human urine increases uric acid crystallization and subsequent stone formation, even if the uric acid excretion rate is normal.38

Distal renal tubular acidosis (not analyzed because no arterial blood sampling was available) is linked to UL because acidemia increases calcium-phosphate released from the bone, producing hypercalciuria and hyperphosphaturia, two well known risk factors for stone formation. On the other hand, metabolic acidosis reduces urinary excretion of citrate, which delays the crystallization of calcium salts.46,50

Twenty-six children (16%) with urinary tract infection (UTI) had metabolic abnormalities, and some had congenital urinary tract malformations (Table 2). The frequency of UTI varied from 10% to 25%, similar to the 16% observed in previous reports.51,52 Twelve children (12/26) developed urease-producing bacteria (Proteus sp, Haemophilus sp, Klebsiella sp and Pseudomonas) with an alkaline urine. Children with infection and stones have underlying metabolic derangements that should be evaluated. Girls are significantly more likely to experience UTI than boys.53

Urinary lithiasis (UL) with NC was noticed in 18/162 children (11%). Their age ranged from 1 to 10 years with no significant gender differences (p<0.74). Final incidence rates are not available for UL, or for NC in children28. Prematurity is a special risk factor for NC29. Metabolic disorders associated to UL and NC, such as renal tubular acidosis, are not uncommon.50 Patients with paracellin-1 (members of the claudin family) defects develop hypomagnesemia and a striking incidence of hypercalciuria and NC54. We observed two children with this biochemical profile, but had UL without NC (Table 3). Hyperprostaglandin E syndrome is a metabolic alteration that causes hypercalciuria and NC by increasing the calcitriol synthesis55,56; Dent's disease57,58, Lowe syndrome58, tyrosinemia type 159, Bartter syndrome60 and others that we could not identify clinically. To distinguishing between both entities (UL and NC) may be problematic. Papillae endoscopic inspection is better to diagnose NC.61 Ultrasonography was more sensitive (96%) than computed tomography (85%) in animals for NC diagnosis.62 Other causes of increased medullary echogenicity are not clear, as the transient medullary hyperechogenicity, or the aggregates of Tamm-Horsfall protein within the renal calyces which may look like nephrocalcinosis.63

Children are more likely to have an underlying metabolic disorder for UL/NC and a higher risk recurrence, hence the identification of metabolic disorder is imperative to prevent stone recurrence. Genetic findings with a non Mendelian transmission pattern, involving multiple genes, suggest that tubular fluid supersaturation with calcium and phosphate predisposes to calcium-oxalate stones by triggering cellular mechanisms that lead to Randall's plaque formation on the surface of the renal papillae.14 Up to date, polymorphisms (SNPs) of 11 genes were associated with idiopathic calcium NL and NC.14 As shown in Table 3, risk factor parameters in patients with NC were similar to those with UL. Interestingly, albumin levels were under 4mg/dl only in children with UL. These findings are unusual, but an association with NL has been reported.39 Two children<3 years had hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and UL without NC.64

As shown in Table 2, oliguria was found in 14 children (8.6%). Children with UL are known to have low urine volumes. Thus, children with a first episode of UL, who were treated with a high-fluid intake for 5 years, had a significantly lower recurrence rate than those who received a low-fluid intake.13

Congenital urinary tract anomalies were seen in 11 children (7%): four with ureteropelvic stenosis, two with double ureter, two with a duplication of the upper ureter with a single lower junction, one with unilateral renal agenesis, one with a vesical septation, and one with an anorectal anomaly. Anatomical abnormalities and urinary tract infections are frequently found in most pediatric patients with UL.

Hypomagnesemia was found in 11 children (7%) and was associated with hypocitraturia and hypomagnesuria.64 Hyperuricosemia was observed in 11 children (7%), and hypercalcemia in 10 (6%); all with normal PTHi values and two or more risk factors associated. Hyperoxaluria was observed in three children (2%) without clinical evidence of any metabolic defect, two of which had moderate inflammatory bowel disease history. Calcium oxalate supersaturation contributes to calcium stone formation.

Hypercistinuria was observed in one patient (0.61%), which had family history of hypercistinuria and frequent urinary tract infection (Table 2). There were no children identified with hyperphosphatemia or hyperphosphaturia.

When the levels of serum P and PTH, and creatinine and P in urine from control children were compared with the same parameters from patients, we found they were similar and normal, although statistically they disclosed differences (Table 1). This is unusual; therefore, some authors make emphasis that not all of the significant statistic results have clinical relevance.65 None of the children exhibited a single risk factor, but at least two or more risk factors for UL.

In the present prospective study, the incidence of UL in this pediatric population was 0.02% in a 5-year period (2009–2014). The median age was 7.5±3.9 years. Male/female ratio was 3:1, and a family history of NL was found in 50% of the children. Abdominal pain was the most common symptom detected (52%). Urinary tract stones were diagnosed mainly by ultrasonography (60%). Pyelocaliceal localization was observed in 52% of the patients. Anatomic and metabolic parameters were evaluated. Hypocitraturia was the highest risk factor found in 70%, hypomagnesuria in 43%; hypercalciuria in 37%. After a Ca restriction diet in 102 children>5 years, hypercalciuria was observed in 20%. After Ca diet followed by a Ca load, 11% of the children exhibited intestinal Ca hyperabsorption. Unclassified hypercalciuria was observed in children>5 years (13%). Resorptive hypercalciuria and Ca renal leak were not observed. Alkaline and acid urine were present in 21% and 20%, respectively. Systemic metabolic acidosis was observed in 20%. Urinary infection was observed in 16% of the children. We found 18 patients with nephrocalcinosis with lithiasis (11%), and oliguria in 8%. Hypomagnesemia, hyperuricosemia and congenital urinary malformation in 7% each one. Basal hypercalcemia was observed in 6%, hyperoxaluria in 2% and hypercystinuria in 0.61%. Hyperparathiroidism, hyperphosphaturia, hiperuricosuria, or other additional risk factors were not observed. All children had two or more risk factors for UL. This study identifies urolithogenic factors that are clinically relevant for nephrologists, urologists, and other physicians.

Ethical disclosureProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Fondo Sectorial de Investigación en Salud y Seguridad Social SS/IMSS/ISSSTE-CONACYT SALUD-2007-01-69898, México.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest of any nature.

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Rubén Aldana for his help in the biochemical analyses, Sandra Olivas for her manuscript assistance, Dr. Luis Eraña, head of the Urology Unit of HIMFG, for his help in identifying patients, PhD Alfonso Reyes for his assistance in the statistical analysis and MD, PhD Silvestre García for his manuscript comments.

References
[1]
J.A. Camacho Díaz, J. Casas Gómez, A. Amat Barnés, A. Giménez Llort, L. García García.
Nephrolithiasis in children.
An Esp Pediatr., 44 (1996), pp. 225-228
[2]
Y.H. Pong, W.Y. Huang, Y.C. Lu, V.F. Tsai, Y.F. Chen, H.C. Chang, et al.
Temporal trend of newly diagnosed incidence, medical utilization, and costs for pediatric urolithiasis, 1998-2007: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.
[3]
J.C. Routh, D.A. Graham, C.P. Nelson.
Epidemiological trends in pediatric urolithiasis at United States freestanding pediatric hospitals.
J Urol., 184 (2010), pp. 1100-1104
[4]
D.J. Sas, T.C. Hulsey, I.F. Shatat, J.K. Orak.
Increasing incidence of kidney stones in children evaluated in the emergency department.
J Pediatr., 157 (2010), pp. 132-137
[5]
P.K. Pietrow, J.C. Pope, 4th, M.C. Adams, Y. Shyr, J.W. Brock, 3rd.
Clinical outcome of pediatric stone disease.
J Urol., 167 (2002), pp. 670-673
[6]
F. Spivacow, A.L. Negri, E.E. del Valle, I. Calviño, E. Fradinger, J.R. Zanchetta.
Metabolic risk factors in children with kidney stone disease.
Pediatr Nephrol., 23 (2008), pp. 1129-1133
[7]
C.C. Liu, S.P. Huang, L.Y. Tsai, W.J. Wu, S.H. Juo, Y.H. Chou, et al.
The impact of osteopontin promoter polymorphisms on the risk of calcium urolithiasis.
Clin Chim Acta., 411 (2010), pp. 739-743
[8]
S.N. Pillay, J.R. Asplin, F.L. Coe.
Evidence that calgranulin is produced by kidney cells and is an inhibitor of calcium oxalate crystallization.
Am J Physiol., 275 (1998), pp. F255-F261
[9]
D.F. Gudbjartsson, H. Holm, O.S. Indridason, G. Thorleifsson, V. Edvardsson, P. Sulem, et al.
Association of variants at UMOD with chronic kidney disease and kidney stones—role of age and comorbid diseases.
PLoS Genet., 6 (2010), pp. e1001039
[10]
M. Ozturk, Y. Kordan, H. Cangul, H.S. Dogan, H. Kilicarslan, H. Vuruskan, et al.
Association of urokinase gene 3’-UTR T/C polymorphisms with calcium oxalate urolithiasis in children.
Int Urol Nephrol., 40 (2008), pp. 563-568
[11]
R. Ryall, R.M. Harnett, C.M. Hibberd, K.A. Edyvane, V.R. Marshall.
Effects of chondroitin sulphate, human serum albumin and Tamm-Horsfall mucoprotein on calcium oxalate crystallization in undiluted human urine.
Urol Res, 19 (1991), pp. 181-188
[12]
M. Resnick, D.B. Pridgen, H.O. Goodman.
Genetic predisposition to formation of calcium oxalate renal calculi.
N Engl J Med., 278 (1968), pp. 1313-1318
[13]
L. Borghi, T. Meschi, F. Amato, A. Briganti, A. Novarini, A. Giannini.
Urinary volume, water and recurrences in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a 5-year randomized prospective study.
J Urol, 155 (1996), pp. 839-843
[14]
T. Arcidiacono, A. Mingione, L. Macrina, F. Pivari, L. Soldati, G. Vezzoli.
Idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a review of pathogenic mechanisms in the light of genetic studies.
Am J Nephrol, 40 (2014), pp. 499-506
[15]
A.C. Persaud, M.D. Stevenson, D.R. McMahon, N.C. Christopher.
Pediatric urolithiasis: clinical predictors in the emergency department.
Pediatrics., 124 (2009), pp. 888-894
[16]
M.J. Dibley, N. Staehling, P. Nieburg, F.L. Trowbridge.
Interpretation of Z-score anthropometric indicators derived from the international growth reference.
Am J Clin Nutr., 46 (1987), pp. 749-762
[17]
G.M. Preminger.
Renal calculi: pathogenesis, diagnosis and medical therapy.
Semin Nephrol, 12 (1992), pp. 200-216
[18]
F. Levy, B. Adams-Huet, C.Y. Pak.
Ambulatory evaluation of nephrolithiasis: an update of a 1980 protocol.
[19]
C. Restrepo de Rovetto, T.R. Welch, G. Hug, K.E. Clark, W. Bergstrom.
Hypercalciuria with Bartter syndrome: evidence for an abnormality of vitamin D metabolism.
J Pediatr., 115 (1989), pp. 397-404
[20]
L. Butani, A. Kalia.
Idiopathic hypercalciuria in children—how valid are the existing diagnostic criteria?.
Pediatr Nephrol., 19 (2004), pp. 577-582
[21]
F.B. Stapleton.
Childhood stones.
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am., 31 (2002), pp. 1001-1015
[22]
S. Ghazali, T. Barratt.
Urinary excretion of calcium and magnesium in children.
Arch Dis Child., 49 (1974), pp. 97-101
[23]
R. Muñoz-Arizpe, L. Escobar, M. Medeiros.
Sobre-diagnóstico de acidosis tubular renal en México.
Rev Invest Clin., 64 (2012), pp. 399-401
[24]
G.K. Siberry, R. Iannone.
The Harriet Lane Handbook: A Manual for Pediatric House Officers.
Mosby, (2000), pp. 453
[25]
F.L. Coe, A.G. Kavalach.
Hypercalciuria and hyperuricosuria in patients with calcium nephrolitiasis.
N Engl J Med., 291 (1974), pp. 1344-1350
[26]
Oxalate kit. Trinity Biotech, 400 Connell Drive Suite 7100. Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922.
[27]
S. Habbig, B.B. Beck, B. Hoppe.
Nephrocalcinosis and urolithiasis in children.
Kidney Int., 80 (2011), pp. 1278-1291
[28]
F. Narter, F. Narter, K. Sarica.
Urinary stones in neonates: dilemma between urolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis.
J Urol Surg., 2 (2015), pp. 1-6
[29]
D.P. Griffith, D.M. Musher.
Prevention of infected urinary stones by urease inhibition.
Invest Urol., 11 (1973), pp. 228-233
[30]
W.B. MacDonald, F.X. Fellers.
Quantitative measurement of cystine in urine.
Modification of the Sullivan test with sodium beta-naphtho-quinone-4-sulfonate. Am J Clin Pathol., 49 (1968), pp. 123-126
[31]
D. Webster.
A study of the interaction of bromocresol green with isolated serum globulin fractions.
Clin Chem Acta., 53 (1974), pp. 109-115
[32]
G.J. Schwartz, B. Gauthier.
A simple estimate of glomerular filtration in adolescent boys.
J Pediatr., 106 (1985), pp. 522-526
[33]
W.H. Hackeng, P. Lips, J. Netelenbos, J. Lips.
Clinical implications of estimation of intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) versus total immunoreactive PTH in normal subjects and hyperparathyroid patients.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab., 63 (1986), pp. 447-453
[34]
D.E. Matthews, V.T. Farewell.
Using and understanding medical statistics.
Karger, (1985),
[35]
H.N. Noe, F.B. Stapleton, G.R. Jerkins, S. Roy, 3rd.
Clinical experience with pediatric urolithiasis.
J Urol., 129 (1983), pp. 1166-1168
[36]
C. Polito, A. La Manna, B. Nappi, J. Villani, R. Di Toro.
Idiopathic hypercalciuria and hyperuricosuria: family prevalence of nephrolitiasis.
Pediatr Nephrol., 14 (2000), pp. 1102-1104
[37]
K. Sarica, B. Eryildirim, F. Yencilek, U. Kuyumcuoglu.
Role of overweight status on stone-forming risk factors in children: a prospective study.
Urology., 73 (2009), pp. 1003-1007
[38]
N. Abate, M. Chandalia, A.V. Cabo-Chan Jr., O.W. Moe, K. Sakhaee.
The metabolic syndrome and uric acid nephrolithiasis: novel features of renal manifestation of insulin resistance.
Kidney Int., 65 (2004), pp. 386-392
[39]
F.L. Coe, A. Evan, E. Worcester.
Kidney stone disease.
J Clin Invest., 115 (2005), pp. 2598-2608
[40]
J. Parks, L. Ruml, C. Pak.
Hypocitraturia.
Kidney stones: medical and surgical management., pp. 905-920
[41]
A. Tefekli, T. Esen, O. Ziylan, B. Erol, A. Armagan, H. Ander, et al.
Metabolic risk factors in pediatric and adult calcium oxalate urinary stone formers: is there any difference?.
Urol Int., 70 (2003), pp. 273-277
[42]
K. VanDervoort, J. Wiesen, R. Frank, S. Vento, V. Crosby, M. Chandra, et al.
Urolithiasis in pediatric patients: a single center study of incidence, clinical presentation and outcome.
J Urol, 177 (2007), pp. 2300-2305
[43]
D.P. Simpson.
Citrate excretion: a window on renal metabolism.
Am J Physiol., 244 (1983), pp. F223-F234
[44]
V.M. Buckalew Jr..
Nephrolithiasis in renal tubular acidosis.
J Urol., 141 (1989), pp. 731-737
[45]
N.A. Breslau, L. Brinkley, K.D. Hill, C.Y. Pak.
Relationship of animal protein-rich diet to kidney stone formation and calcium metabolism.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab., 66 (1988), pp. 140-146
[46]
M.J. Nicar, R. Peterson, C.Y. Pak.
Use of potassium citrate as potassium supplement during thiazide therapy of calcium nephrolithiasis.
J Urol., 131 (1984), pp. 430-433
[47]
M. Marangella, C. Vitale, M. Manganaro, D. Cosseddu, C. Martini, M. Petrarulo, et al.
Renal handling of citrate in chronic renal insufficiency.
Nephron., 57 (1991), pp. 439-443
[48]
K. Sakhaee, S. Nigam, P. Snell, M.C. Hsu, C.Y. Pak.
Assessment of the pathogenetic role of physical exercise in renal stone formation.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab., 65 (1987), pp. 974-979
[49]
P.M. Hall.
Nephrolithiasis: treatment, causes and prevention.
Cleveland Clin J Med., 76 (2009), pp. 583-591
[50]
B. Hess.
Acid-base metabolism: implications for kidney stones formation.
Urol Res., 34 (2006), pp. 134-138
[51]
B. Foxman.
Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs.
Am J Med., 113 (2002), pp. 5S-13S
[52]
W.Y. Kwok, M.C. de Kwaadsteniet, M. Harmsen, L.W. van Suijlekon-Smit, F.G. Schellevis, J.C. van der Wouden.
Incidence rates and management of urinary tract infections among children in Dutch general practice: results from a nation-wide registration study.
BMC Pediatr., 6 (2006), pp. 10
[53]
K.S. Kamel, M.A. Shafiee, S. Cheema-Dhadli, M.L. Halperin.
Studies to identify the basis for an alkaline urine pH in patients with calcium hydrogen phosphate kidney stones.
Nephrol Dial Transplant., 22 (2007), pp. 424-431
[54]
S. Weber, L. Scheider, M. Peters, J. Misselwitz, G. Ronnefarth, M. Böswald, et al.
Novel paracellin-1 mutations in 25 families with familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis.
J Am Soc Nephrol., 12 (2001), pp. 1872-1881
[55]
T.R. Welch.
The hyperprostaglandin E syndrome: a hypercalciuric variant of Bartter's syndrome.
J Bone Miner Res., 12 (1997), pp. 1753-1754
[56]
F. Velásquez-Forero, P. García, J.T. Triffitt, F. Llach.
Prostaglandin E1 increases in vivo and in vitro calcitriol biosynthesis in rabbits.
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids., 75 (2006), pp. 107-115
[57]
G.A. Sliman, W.D. Winters, D.W. Shaw, E.D. Avner.
Hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis in the oculocerebrorenal syndrome.
J Urol., 153 (1995), pp. 1244-1246
[58]
R.V. Thakker.
Molecular pathology of renal chloride channels in Dent's disease and Bartter's syndrome.
Exp Nephrol., 8 (2000), pp. 351-360
[59]
J. Laine, M.K. Salo, L. Krogerus, J. Kärkkäinen, Ö. Wahlroos, C. Holmerg.
The nephropathy of type I tyrosinemia after liver transplantation.
Pediatr Res., 37 (1995), pp. 640-645
[60]
D.B. Simon, F.E. Karet, J. Rodriguez-Soriano, J.H. Hamdam, A. DiPietro, H. Trachtman, et al.
Genetic heterogeneity of Bartter's syndrome revealed by mutations in the K+channel.
ROMK. Nat Genet., 14 (1996), pp. 152-156
[61]
J.D. Le, B.H. Eisner, T.Y. Tseng, T. Chi, M.L. Stoller.
Laterality of nephrocalcinosis in kidney stone formers with severe hypocitraturia.
[62]
A. Auron, U.S. Alon.
Resolution of medullary nephrocalcinosis in children with metabolic bone disorders.
Pediatr Nephrol., 20 (2005), pp. 1143-1145
[63]
B. Hoppe, D. Milliner, A. Leumann.
Urolithiasis and Nephrocalcinosis in Childhood.
Comprehensive pediatric nephrology., pp. 499-525
[64]
M. Praga, J. Vara, E. González-Parra, A. Andrés, C. Alamo, A. Araque, et al.
Familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis.
Kidney Int., 47 (1995), pp. 1419-1425
[65]
J.A.C. Sterne, G. Davey Smith.
Sifting the evidence—what's wrong with significance tests?.
BMJ., 322 (2001), pp. 226-231

Copyright © 2016. Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en pt
Política de cookies Cookies policy Política de cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.