Buscar en
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition) Bacterial colonisation of suction cannulas in orthopaedic surgery
Journal Information
Vol. 64. Issue 5.
Pages 318-325 (September - October 2020)
Visits
17
Vol. 64. Issue 5.
Pages 318-325 (September - October 2020)
Original Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.recote.2020.07.004
Full text access
Bacterial colonisation of suction cannulas in orthopaedic surgery
Colonización bacteriana de las cánulas de succión en cirugía ortopédica
Visits
...
E. González Ederya, F. Monclou Garzóna, J. Reatigab,
Corresponding author
juanreatiga@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, X. Ríosb, A. de la Rosac, L. Arzuza Ortegad
a Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Clínica Valle Salud, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
b Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Fundación Campbell, Barranquilla, Colombia
c Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Clínica Bahía, Santa Marta, Colombia
d Epidemiología, Grupo Campbell, Barranquilla, Colombia
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Tables (3)
Table 1. Description of the socio-demographic, surgical and microbiological characteristics.
Table 2. Comparison of the socio-demographic and surgical characteristics with and without suction cannula colonisation.
Table 3. Risk factors associated with suction cannula colonisation.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Introduction

Osteoarticular infections represent a major complication in orthopaedic surgery. The aim is to identify the percentage of suction cannulas colonised and to determine the relationship between the time they are used in surgery and the colonisation of these cannulas.

Materials and methods

Descriptive and prospective study that analysed 546 suction cannulas used in clean orthopaedic surgery in a trauma centre, between November 2017 and March 2018. The distal end of the cannula was cultured to determine the colonisation rate.

Results

7.3% of the cultured cannulas were positive for pathogens, the most frequent being Staphylococcus epidermidis at 27.5%. In addition, an association was found between colonisation and the length of time the cannula was used. The possibility of colonisation of cannulas used for between 60min or more, is greater than those used for less than 60min; between 60 and 90min the possibility is twice as high OR=2.2 (95% CI 1.1–4.1) and in cannulas used for more than 90min it is 8 times higher OR=8.49 (95% CI 1.77–40.86).

Conclusions

The colonisation rate of cannulas is lower than reported in the literature. The longer the cannula is used in surgery increases the risk of their colonisation. Follow-up studies are being considered to determine whether suction cannula colonisation is associated with increased postoperative infection.

Keywords:
Colonisation
Arthroplasty
Osteosynthesis
Pathogens
Suction catheter
Airflow
Resumen
Introducción

Las infecciones osteoarticulares representan una complicación mayor en cirugía ortopédica. Se pretende identificar el porcentaje de cánulas de succión colonizadas y determinar la relación entre el tiempo de uso en cirugía y la colonización de estas.

Materiales y métodos

Estudio descriptivo y prospectivo que analiza 546 cánulas de succión utilizadas en cirugía ortopédica limpia en un centro de trauma, entre noviembre del 2017 a marzo del 2018. El extremo distal de la cánula fue cultivado para determinar la proporción de colonización.

Resultados

El 7,3% de las cánulas cultivadas tuvieron cultivos positivos para gérmenes patógenos, de los cuales el más frecuente fue Staphylococcus epidermidis con 27,5%. Además, se encontró asociación entre la colonización y el tiempo de uso de la cánula. La posibilidad de colonización de cánulas usadas entre 60 minutos o más, es mayor que en las que se usaron menos de 60 minutos; entre 60 y 90 minutos la posibilidad es dos veces mayor OR=2,2 (IC:95% 1,1-4,1) y en las cánulas usadas por más de 90 minutos es 8 veces mayor OR=8,49 (IC:95% 1,77-40,86).

Conclusiones

La proporción de colonización de las cánulas es menor a lo reportado en la literatura. El mayor tiempo de uso de la cánula en la cirugía aumenta el riesgo de la colonización de estas. Se considera realizar estudios de seguimiento para determinar si la colonización de las cánulas de succión se asocia a un incremento de infección postoperatoria.

Palabras clave:
Colonización
Artroplastia
Osteosíntesis
Agentes patógenos
Catéter de succión
Flujo de aire
Full Text
Introduction

Surgical site infection (SSI) in orthopaedic and trauma surgery is one of the most dreaded complications in this surgical area due to the high percentage of implants used, which hinder management and on many occasions removal of them is required to control the infection.

SSI generate high rates of mortality, long-term disability and prolonged hospital stays which impact quality of life and increase health system costs.1,2

Considerable advances have been made to mitigate the risk of infections associated with healthcare. These include less invasive surgical techniques, the use of prophylactic antibiotics and preoperative sterile measures.3 However, according to the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention infections associated with healthcare continue being one of the most common adverse events relating to health service provision.2 SSI are the second most notable type of adverse event in the world, presenting in approximately 14% of hospitalised patients and in 38% of patients who undergo surgery,1 with an associated mortality rate of 3%.3

Suction cannulas are used as an everyday tool in the great majority of orthopaedic surgery, since they enable visualisation of the operative field. However, some authors consider that the continuous airflow through the end of the suction cannula (which in most operations suctions continuously during the whole procedure) may generate a site of turbulence and encourage the attachment of microorganisms at this level, which would result in the production of a SSI.4 In their studies authors such as Strange-Vognsen et al., in 1988,5 and Givissis et al., in 2008,6 reported a contamination rate of 54% in the suction cannulas used in orthopaedic procedures with isolation in the cultivated cannula end with different types of Staphylococcus. In theory, this colonisation of the suction cannula end could be linked to the rate of surgical site infections in the patient but available publications are controversial and there has not yet been any scientific evidence to confirm this hypothesis.

This study was conducted with the aim of determining the percentage of suction cannulas colonised during orthopaedic operations of an institution specialising in trauma, to identify the contaminating microorganisms and establish the pre-and-intraoperative factors which may have been associated with colonisation. The intention was to generate new future studies which would finally assess the clinical outcome of patients with colonised cannulas and their association with the rate of SSI.

Materials and methods

A descriptive, prospective study which analysed 546 results from microbiological cultures of suction cannula ends used in clean orthopaedic operations of arthroplasties and osteosyntheses performed in a centre specialising in orthopaedics in the city of Barranquilla, northern Colombia, between November 2017 and March 2018.

Inclusion criteria were all cultures from suction cannulas which had been used in clean orthopaedic operations. Cannulas used in open fracture procedures were excluded, as were those from operations on limbs with extensive involvement, operations with more than one fracture in the same limb and cases which presented with a history of previous infections.

Suction cannula analysis was performed immediately after the operation by cutting off the distal end of the disposable plastic cannula, which was then sent to the clinical laboratory in a sterile vial and marked with a code for follow-up of the case. The clinical laboratory processed the specimen by adding a fluid enriched with thioglycolate for 2–4h and then putting it into different media: blood agar, chocolate agar and MacConkey agar. It was incubated at 37°C and the results were assessed after 24 and 48h. In positive cases the germ and antibiogram were identified using the automated VITEK®2 Compact (bioMerieux, Hazelwood, U.S.A.).

Several variables were taken into account, including age, sex and surgical factors such as antibiotic prophylaxis, mean time in surgery in minutes from the moment the incision was made until its closure, volume of blood measured in cubic cm (cc), volume of irrigation in (cc), time in minutes of suction cannula use from the beginning of the surgery until it was decided suction should be terminated in the intraoperative period, and any surgical complications arising.

Information was processed with the SPSS statistical package version 25. Descriptive analysis consisted in calculating frequency measures, central tendency and dispersion. The factors associated with cannula colonisation were calculated using simple binary logistic regression. Once identified, the strength of association of each of these factors was measured using a multivariate logistic regression model. The level of significance used was .05.

This research study was approved by the hospital ethics committee and conducted in accordance with the regulations established in Resolution 8430 of 1993 of the Ministry of Health of Colombia; it was classified as a “non risk” study.

Results

The results of the culture tests of 546 suction cannulas were analysed, corresponding 546 patients who underwent clean orthopaedic operations, including those of osteosynthesis and articular replacements. In Table 1 it may be observed that 36.63% of the cannulas corresponded to female patients and 63.37% to male, with the most common age range being between 20 and 39 years (40.1%). Positive cultures were obtained in 40 cases (7.3%), from which the most frequently isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) (27.5%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) (12.5%) and Enterobacter cloacae (E. cloacae) (10.0%) (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Description of the socio-demographic, surgical and microbiological characteristics.

Variable  Categories  n=546  Percentage 
Socio-demographic characteristics of cannula usage
Sex  Female  200  36.63% 
  Male  346  63.37% 
Age group  <20  48  8.80% 
  20–39  219  40.10% 
  40–59  126  23.10% 
  60 and over  153  28.00% 
Surgical characteristics of cannula usages
Surgical complications  Yes  .37% 
  No  544  99.63% 
  No  .55% 
Prophylaxis reinforcement  Yes  96  17.58% 
  No  450  82.42% 
Time in surgery  <60min  41  7.5 
  60–90min  272  49.8 
  >90min  233  42.7 
Volume of suction in cc  <1000cc  108  19.8 
  1000–1500cc  293  53.7 
  >1500cc  145  26.6 
Irrigation volume in cc  <1000cc  71  13 
  1000–1500  330  60.4 
  >1500  145  26.6 
Time of suction cannula usage  <60min  171  31.3 
  60–90min  255  46.7 
  >90min  120  22 
Time of antibiotic prophylaxis before incision  <20  240  44 
  20–40  276  50.5 
  <40  30  5.5 
Microbiological characteristics
Culture result  Positive  40  7.33% 
  Negative  506  92.67% 
Figure 1.

Proportion of isolated microorganism in the suction cannulas.

(0.29MB).

Fig. 2 shows that the most common operations were osteosynthesis of the distal radial metaphysis (17.77%), followed by osteosynthesis of the tibial saucers (8.42%) and osteosynthesis in the hand (6.59%). 100% received antibiotic prophylaxis with 1g of intravenous cefalexin, which was administered between 20 and 40min prior to surgical incision. The majority of the operations (49.8%) lasted between 60 and 90min and in 46.7% of them the cannulas were used between 60 and 90min.

Figure 2.

Proportion of operations analysed in the suction cannula colonisation study.

(0.42MB).

Table 2 shows the bivariate analysis where the groups with suction cannulas, with and without positive colonisation, were compared. We observed a higher proportion of colonised cannulas used in women (55%), p=0.12. There was also a larger proportion of colonisation when the cannulas were used for 60min or more, p=.002. No significant differences were observed during the time in surgery, suction volume, irrigation volume, prophylaxis use, time of prophylaxis application, prophylaxis booster and type of operation.

Table 2.

Comparison of the socio-demographic and surgical characteristics with and without suction cannula colonisation.

Variables  Positive cultures (n=40)  Negative culture (n=506)  p value 
Sex
Male  18 (45%)  328 (64.8%)  .012 
Female  22 (55%)  178 (35.2%)   
Age group
<20  3 (7.5%)  45 (8.9%)  .093 
20–39  11 (27.5%)  208 (41.1%)   
40–59  8 (20%)  118 (23.3%)   
60 and over  18 (45%)  135 (26.7%)   
Time in surgery
<60  2 (5%)  39 (7.7%)  .25 
60–90  16 (40%)  256 (50.6%)   
>90  22 (55%)  211 (41.7%)   
Suction volume
<1000  3 (7.5%)  105 (20.8%)  .10 
1000–1500  23 (57.5%)  270 (53.4%)   
>1500  14 (35%)  131 (25.9%)   
Irrigation volume
<1000  1 (2.5%)  70 (13.8%)  .11 
1000–1500  26 (65%)  304 (60.1%)   
>1500  13 (32.5%)  132 (26.1%)   
Time of suction cannula usage
<60  6 (15%)  165 (32.6%)  .002 
60–90  17 (42.5%)  238 (47%)   
>90  17 (42.5%)  103 (20.4)   
Antibiotic prophylaxis
Yes  40 (100%)  503 (99.4%)  1.00 
No  3 (.6%)   
Prophylaxis application time (preop)
<20  16 (40.0%)  224 (44.0%)  .77 
20–40  21 (52.5%)  255 (50.0%)   
>40  3 (.08%)  27 (.05%)   
Prophylaxis booster
Yes  11 (27.5%)  85 (16.8%)  .08 
No  29 (72.5%)  421 (83.2%)   
Complications
Yes  2 (.4%)  .69 
No  40 (100%)  504 (99.6%)   
Type of fracture  Positive cultures n=40  Negative cultures n=506  p 
Lower radial epiphyseal fracture  5 (12.5%)  92 (18.2%)  .3 
Upper tibial epiphyseal fracture  2 (5%)  44 (8.7%)   
Fracture of other finger of the hand  36 (7.1%)   
Unspecified osteoarthritis of the knee  2 (5%)  30 (5.9%)   
Inter-tronchanteric fracture  3 (7.5%)  28 (5.5%)   
Tibial shaft fracture  2 (5%)  25 (4.9%)   
Fracture of the upper humeral epiphysis  6 (15%)  21 (4.2%)   
Clavicle fracture  3 (7.5%)  22 (4.3%)   
Fracture of the leg, part unspecified  3 (7.5%)  20 (4.0%)   
Fracture of the fibula alone  2 (5%)  17 (3.4%)   
Unspecified fracture of the foot  17 (3.4%)   
Femoral shaft fracture  3 (7.5%)  13 (2.6%)   
Unspecific osteoarthritis of the hip  15 (3.0%)   
Femoral neck fracture  13 (2.6%)   
Acetabulum fracture  2 (5%)  10 (2.0%)   
Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint  1 (2.5%)  11 (2.2%)   
Lower tibial epiphyseal fracture  11 (2.2%)   
Upper radial epiphyseal fracture o  1 (2.5%)  10 (2.0%)   
Other fractures  5 (12.5%)  71 (14%)   

To determine the possible factors associated with suction cannula colonisation the crude and adjusted OR were calculated, which may be observed in Table 3.

Table 3.

Risk factors associated with suction cannula colonisation.

Variables  Crude OR (95% CI)  p  Adjusted OR (95% CI)  p 
Sex
Female  2.1 (1.17–4.37)  .01  2.1 (1.08–4.0)  .027 
Male         
Age group
<20         
20–39  .79 (.21–2.96)  .73  .71 (.18–2.81)  .63 
40–59  1.02 (.26–4.00)  .98  .87 (.21–3.62)  .85 
60 and over  2.00 (.56–7.11)  .28  1.4 (.35–5.64)  .62 
Prophylaxis booster
Yes         
No  .53 (.26–1.11)  .09  1.10 (.38–3.10)  .86 
Time between prophylaxis and surgical incision
<20min         
20–40min  1.15 (.58–2.26)  .68  1.22 (.58–2.60)  .60 
>40min  1.56 (.43–5.68)  .50  1.38 (.28–6.76)  .70 
Time in surgery
<60min         
60–90min  2.2 (.27–5.50)  .35  .52 (.09–3.10)  .47 
>90min  2.03 (.46–8.99)  .80  .33 (.05–2.43)  .27 
Suction volume in cc
<1000cc         
1000–1500cc  2.98 (.88–10.14)  .08  .73 (.14–3.97)  .72 
>1500cc  3.74 (1.05–13.36)  .04  1.20 (.14–10.59)  .87 
Irrigation volume cc
<1000cc         
1000–1500  5.98 (.80–44.87)  .08  8.33 (.66–105.75)  .10 
>1500  6.89 (.88–53.79)  .07  4.16 (.23–74.81)  .33 
Time of suction cannula usage
<60min         
60–90min  2.2 (1.1–4.1)  .03  2.75 (.83–9.07)  .09 
>90min  4.53 (1.73–11.89)  .002  8.49 (1.77–40.86)  .008 

The crude OR showed that the female sex is associated with colonisation (OR of 2.3 95% CI[1.17–4.34] p=.014) and time of cannula use between 60 and 90min (OR of 2.2 95% CI[1.1–4.1] p=.03); when cannula exposure time was greater than 90min the probability of colonisation increased (OR of 4.5 95% CI[1.73–11.89] p=.002). The other variables studied did not present with any statistically significant association.

Carrying out multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model for calculating the adjusted OR through all the independent variables studied, it was shown that the sex female continued to present a statistically significant association with colonisation (OR of 2.3 95% CI[1.08–4.0] p=.027) similarly to the time of usage of the cannula over 90min (OR 8.5 95% CI[1.77–40.86] p=.008). The other variables studied were not associated.

Discussion

SSI in orthopaedics and trauma is one of the most serious complications that may present after surgery where an implant has been introduced, whether this be a hip, knee or osteosynthesis material implant. It is associated with considerable morbimortality, an increase in hospital costs and the propagation of multi-resistant pathogens.7

Contamination may occur at any time during surgery, from the sterile surgical team or instruments directly introduced into the wound such as catheter suction cannulas which may be a reservoir of microorganisms.8 This study revealed a 7.3%, positivity of culture from suction cannulas which is similar to that reported by Insull and Hudson in 2012. They found that 7.8% of the suction cannulas ends were colonised.8 Other authors, however, have reported a higher percentage that ranges between 24.7% and 80% of positivity.5–10 It was considered that the non-prolonged nature of our surgical procedures, which in 50% of cases was 60min or less had an impact on this result, together with the use of a laminar flow chamber and the strict implementation of sterile techniques as part of the protocol used. Strange-Vognsen et al., in 1988,5 and Givissis et al., in 2008,6 reported a contamination rate of 54%. However, when filtering out the operations which lasted under 1h, this percentage dropped to 9.1% and in addition to this they reported on the non use of laminar flow chambers. Furthermore, their protocol included an initial subculturing in nutrient broth for 48h and subsequent transfer to culture media. This subculturing may have increased the risk of contamination. In the study conducted in Gaza, Palestine, in 2012, Al Laham showed a percentage of culture positivity of 24.7%.9 Review of their protocol found that they did not cultivate the cannulas directly but that the samples were taken with swabs, which is contraindicated by WAIOT principles, and this could have impacted their results. In 2015 Larsson et al. found a percentage of colonisation of 80%10; in this case it is important to note that the average time of surgery in this study was higher than 103min, a situation which has been shown to impact cannula colonisation.10 Furthermore, Vognosse,5 with a colonisation percentage of 54% reported in his study the anaesthesia time and did not specify time in surgery or the use of laminar flow chambers within his protocol.

The most commonly cultivated microorganisms were S. epidermidis (27.5%), followed by S. aureus (12.5%) and E. cloacae (10%); several authors also identified these microorganisms as causal to contamination.4–9 The presence of these pathogenic agents could be explained by the large volume of air which passes through the suction cannula end, through direct contamination of the end with the patient's skin or inappropriate sterile techniques by the surgical team.

One of the most relevant findings of this study is the association between suction cannula colonisation and usage time, which shows that the possibility of cannula colonisation is duplicated from 60min upwards in surgery (OR=2.2 [95% CI: 1.1–4.1]) and the possibility is 8 times higher after 90min of surgery (OR=8.5 [95% CI: 1.77–40.86]). These data are similar to those found in other studies where authors have shown cannula contamination rates rise when they are used for over 60min. One of them is by Givissis et al.,6 who found there was a higher risk of colonisation of the suction cannula end when time in surgery exceeds 60min, observing that the colonisation of the cannula was positive in 66.7% of cases, where surgery exceeded this time, and raising the contamination rate up to seven times, from 9.1% to 66.7%, p-value=.011.6 This author maintains that the end of the suction catheter may be a reservoir for microorganisms due to the continuous passing of large amounts of air through bloodshed and the catheter end may therefore lead to its contamination, with consideration that the longer the cannula is used during surgery the more it may later lead to subclinical or delayed infection, and particularly around artificial joints. In 2007 Byrne et al., reported that catheter colonisation may also be associated with a longer time in surgery. In surgical procedures of under 90min the contamination rate was 17%, and in operations of over 90min the contamination rate was 33%.7

In the most recent consensus on infection led by Parvizi (2019) they recommended changing the cannula after 1h of surgery in order to reduce the rate of contamination,11 considering that in this way the rate of colonisation would decrease, based on the suction cannula creating a constant airflow and it is this airflow which could generate the contamination. However, it is important to stress that no study has been published in the literature which correlates cannula colonisation with surgical site infection. Only one study identified a case where the germ obtained in the cannula coincided with the germ isolated in the cultures of a patient with surgical site infection.6

From this study and the others reviewed, the hypothesis exists that future studies could resolve this question, and determine whether cannula colonisation occurs when the cannula comes into contact with the wound tissues and may be associated with SSI in patients in the immediate or medium term postoperative period.

The authors recognise that one limitation of this study is its inability to generate a clinical correlation between cannula colonisation and surgical site infection for the patient. It would be of great use to follow up patients in their evolution to assess the possible clinical correlation with infection.

Conclusions

Despite the lack of available literature to compare this research, we consider that the proportion of suction cannula colonisation is lower than expected and, in turn, lower than that reported by the studies made, with duration time of cannula use in surgery the main factor to impact on colonisation percentage.

Reducing the time of the suction cannula by compressing this during surgery, except when it is required to visualise the operative field, could reduce airflow to this level and therefore reduce the percentage of colonisation. In any event, the administration of antibiotics of choice for Staphylococcus is also recommended.

Bearing in mind that a not insignificant percentage of suction cannulas are colonised during surgery, it is of interest for future studies to identify the relationship between the percentage of suction cannula colonisation with SSI, and also to identify whether the intermittent use of suction systems reduces colonisation percentage or whether it is necessary to change the suction cannula after 1h in surgery.

Level of evidence

Level of evidence IV.

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

References
[1]
T. Blanchar.
Infecciones asociadas a procedimientos medico quirurgicos.
Instituto Nacional de Salud, (2019),
[2]
Report on the Burden of Endemic Health Care-Associated Infection Worldwide. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge. Clean Care Is Safer Care.
(2011), pp. 1-34
[3]
S.S. Awad.
Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and post-operative surgical site infections.
Surg Infect, (2012), pp. 234-237
[4]
M. Austin, G. Garrigues, S. Heller, J. Huddleston, B. Klatt, V. Krebs, et al.
Medio ambiente quirurgico.
Acta Ortop Mex, 27 (2013),
[5]
M.H. Strange-Vognsen, B. Klareskov.
Bacteriologic contamination of suction tips during hip arthroplasty.
Acta Orthopaedica, 59 (1988), pp. 410-411
[6]
P. Givissis, D. Karataglis, P. Antonarakos, P.D. Symeonidis, A. Christodoulou.
Suction during orthopaedic surgery. How safe is the suction tip?.
Acta Orthop Belg, 74 (2008), pp. 531-533
[7]
A.M. Byrne, S. Morris, T. McCarthy, W. Quinlan, J.M. O’Byrne.
Outcome following deep wound contamination in cemented arthroplasty.
Int Orthop, 31 (2007), pp. 27-31
[8]
P.J. Insull, J. Hudson.
Suction tip: a potential source of infection in clean orthopaedic procedures.
ANZ J Surg, 82 (2012), pp. 185-186
[9]
N.A. Al Laham.
Prevalence of bacterial contamination in general operating theaters in selected hospitals in the Gaza Strip, Palestine.
J Infect Public Health, 5 (2012), pp. 43-51
[10]
J. Larsson, S. Sutherland, Å. Söderström, C. Roman-Emanuel, A. Jeppsson, E.H. Olofsson, et al.
Bacterial contamination of suction catheter tips during aortic valve replacement surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.
Patient Safety Surg, 9 (2015),
[11]
M. Alsadaan, H.A. Alrumaih, T. Brown, F.J. Burgo, F.J. Cabo, Y. Fillingham, et al.
General assembly, prevention, operating room – surgical field: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections.
J Arthroplasty, 34 (2019), pp. S127-S130

Please cite this article as: González Edery E, Monclou Garzón F, Reatiga J, Ríos X, de la Rosa A, Arzuza Ortega L. Colonización bacteriana de las cánulas de succión en cirugía ortopédica. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2020.04.007

Copyright © 2020. SECOT
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

es en pt
Política de cookies Cookies policy Política de cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.