metricas
Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition) Quality of postoperative recovery after breast surgery. General anaesthesia comb...
Journal Information
Vol. 63. Issue 10.
Pages 553-612 (December 2016)
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
631
Vol. 63. Issue 10.
Pages 553-612 (December 2016)
Original article

Quality of postoperative recovery after breast surgery. General anaesthesia combined with paravertebral versus serratus-intercostal block

Calidad de la recuperación posquirúrgica tras cirugía de mama. Anestesia general combinada con bloqueo paravertebral versus bloqueo del espacio serrato-intercostal
Visits
631
M.A. Pérez Herreroa,
Corresponding author
mapeherrero@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, S. López Álvarezb, A. Fadrique Fuentesa, F. Manzano Loreficea, C. Bartolomé Bartoloméa, J. González de Záratea
a Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
b Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Abstract
Introduction

The quality of postoperative recovery is one of the most important among all the quality indicators used in clinical situations. This is even more important after cancer surgery. Our aim was to evaluate this after non-reconstructive breast surgery under general anaesthesia and paravertebral blockade or serratus–intercostal plane blockade, in the early and late post-operative period.

Material and methods

A prospective observational study was conducted on 60 patients (25 paravertebral blockade group and 35 serratus–intercostal plane blockade group) scheduled for non-reconstructive breast surgery during a 6 month period. Every patient received general anaesthesia and were randomised to receive either paravertebral blockade or serratus–intercostal plane blockade. The quality of post-anaesthetic recovery was quantified by Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale, which is used to assess physiological, nociceptive, emotional, autonomy, cognitive and general state domains at different times: baseline (before surgery), 15min after the end of surgery, at discharge to home, and one month after surgery.

Results

A total recovery of 95.93% was achieved in the early postoperative period (15min PACU), 99.07% at discharge to home, and 99.25% at one month after the intervention. No significant differences were found between groups in total score or in each evaluated area.

Conclusions

A progressive improvement was observed in the scores assessed with the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale, reaching values that would allow the discharge to home and early return to usual active life from the immediate postoperative period, with no significant differences between the 2 analgesic techniques. Savings in opioid use and the excellent recovery were observed in all measured domains observed.

Keywords:
Breast cancer surgery
General anaesthesia
Total quality management
Postoperative recovery
Regional anaesthesia
Resumen
Introducción

La cuantificación de la calidad de la recuperación posquirúrgica destaca entre los indicadores de calidad utilizados en clínica. Ello es más importante aún tras cirugía oncológica. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la calidad de la recuperación tras cirugía no reconstructiva de mama tras anestesia general combinada con bloqueo paravertebral versus bloqueo del espacio serrato-intercostal en el postoperatorio inmediato y tardío.

Material y métodos

Estudio observacional prospectivo en 60 pacientes programadas para cirugía no reconstructiva de mama en un periodo de 6 meses bajo anestesia combinada general y bloqueo paravertebral (25 pacientes) o bloqueo del espacio serrato-intercostal (35 pacientes). La calidad de la recuperación postanestésica se midió con la escala Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale, valorando los dominios fisiológico, nociceptivo, emocional, autonomía, cognitivo y estado general en diferentes momentos: basal (previo a cirugía), 15min tras finalizar la intervención, al alta hospitalaria y al mes postintervención.

Resultados

Se consiguió una recuperación total del 95,93% en el postoperatorio inmediato (15min unidad de recuperación postoperatoria [URPA]), del 99,07% al alta y del 99,25% al mes de la intervención. No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos ni en la puntuación total ni en las diversas áreas medidas por la escala.

Conclusiones

Con la técnica descrita se ha objetivado una alta puntuación de recuperación con la Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale, que posibilitaría el alta en el postoperatorio inmediato y la vuelta precoz a la vida activa habitual. En ambos grupos se observó un ahorro de opioides y una recuperación excelente de todos los dominios evaluados, sin diferencias significativas.

Palabras clave:
Cirugía de cáncer de mama
Anestesia general
Gestión de calidad total
Recuperación postanestésica
Anestesia regional

Article

These are the options to access the full texts of the publication Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition)
Subscriber
Subscriber

If you already have your login data, please click here .

If you have forgotten your password you can you can recover it by clicking here and selecting the option “I have forgotten my password”
Purchase
Purchase article

Purchasing article the PDF version will be downloaded

Purchase now
Contact
Phone for subscriptions and reporting of errors
From Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. (GMT + 1) except for the months of July and August which will be from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Calls from Spain
932 415 960
Calls from outside Spain
+34 932 415 960
E-mail
References
[1]
J.E. Tyczynski, F. Bray, D.M. Parkin.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. ENCR Cancer Fact Sheets, (December 2002),
[2]
R. Aufforth, J. Jain, J. Morreale, R. Baumgarten, J. Falk, C. Wesen.
Paravertebral blocks in breast cancer surgery: is there a difference in postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting?.
Ann Surg Oncol, 19 (2012), pp. 548-552
[3]
P. Thavaneswaran, G.E. Rudkin, R.D. Cooter, D.G. Moyes, C.L. Perera, G.J. Maddern.
Brief reports: paravertebral block for anesthesia: a systematic review.
Anesth Analg, 110 (2010), pp. 1740-1744
[4]
S.C. Kettner, H. Willschke, P. Marhofer.
Does regional anaesthesia really improve outcome?.
Br J Anaesth, 107 (2011), pp. i90-i95
[5]
F.W. Abdallah, P.J. Morgan, T. Cil, A. McNaught, J.M. Escallon, J.L. Semple, et al.
Ultrasound-guided multilevel paravertebral blocks and total intravenous anesthesia improve the quality of recovery after ambulatory breast tumor resection.
Anesthesiology, 120 (2014), pp. 703-713
[6]
S.U. Schnabel Reichl, P. Kranke, E.M. Pogatzki-Zahn, P.K. Zahn.
Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Br J Anaesth, 105 (2010), pp. 842-852
[7]
A.S. Terkawi, M.E. Durieux, A. Gottschalk, D. Brenin, M. Tiouririne.
Effect of intravenous lidocaine on postoperative recovery of patients undergoing mastectomy: a double-bind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.
Reg Anesth Pain Med, 39 (2014), pp. 472-477
[8]
P. Diéguez, M. Fajardo, S. López, P. Alfaro, A. Pensado.
Abordaje guiado por ultrasonidos de los nervios intercostales en la línea media axilar para cirugía de mama no reconstructiva y de la axila.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 60 (2013), pp. 365-370
[9]
M.M. Pace, B. Sharma, J. Anderson-Dam, K. Fleishmann, L. Warren, P. Stefanovich.
Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blockade: a retrospective study of the incidence of complications.
Anesth Analg, 122 (2016), pp. 1186-1191
[10]
A. Kumar.
Single injection paravertebral block for major cancer breast surgery.
J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol, 25 (2009), pp. 281-284
[11]
P. Diéguez, P. Casas, S. López, M. Fajardo.
Bloqueos guiados por ultrasonidos para cirugía mamaria.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 63 (2016), pp. 159-167
[12]
R. Blanco, T. Parras, J.G. McDonnell, A. Prats-Galino.
Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block.
Anaesthesia, 68 (2013), pp. 1107-1113
[13]
S. López Alvarez, P. Diéguez García, J. Juncal Díaz.
Anestesia en cirugía ambulatoria. Anestesia fuera de quirófano.
Tomo I. Sección IV (Subespecialidades). Tratado de Anestesia,
[14]
M. Zaballos García, S. López Álvarez, S. Agustí Martínez-Arcos, T. Blanco Sánchez, F. Bustos Molina, P. Cabré Fabré, et al.
Nuevas aportaciones de la mascarilla laríngea en cirugía ambulatoria. Contribución de la mascarilla laríngea Supreme.
Cir May Amb, 16 (2012), pp. 94-102
[15]
Eficiencia en la utilización de bloques quirúrgicos. Definición de indicadores. Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias. AIAQS Núm 2010/04.
(2012),
[16]
C.F. Royse, S. Newman, F. Chung, J. Stygall, R.E. McKay, J. Boldt, et al.
Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale.
Anesthesiology, 113 (2010), pp. 892-905
[17]
G. Haller, J. Stoelwinder, P.S. Mylkes, J. McNeil.
Quality and safety indicators in anesthesia: a systematic review.
Anesthesiology, 110 (2009), pp. 1158-1175
[18]
D.I. Sessler.
Long-term consequences of anesthetic management.
Anesthesiology, 111 (2009), pp. 1-4
[19]
R.M. De Lille-Fuente.
Calidad en anestesia.
Rev Mex Anesth, 36 (2013), pp. S69-S74
[20]
B.M. Lee, J.P. Cata.
Impact of anesthesia on cancer recurrence.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 62 (2015), pp. 570-575
[21]
A.K. Exadaktylos, D.J. Buggy, D.C. Moriarty, E. Mascha, D. Sessler.
Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis?.
Anesthesiology, 105 (2006), pp. 660-664
[22]
J. Jakobsson.
Assessing recovery after ambulatory anaesthesia, measures of resumption of activities of daily living.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 24 (2011), pp. 601-604
[23]
M.H. Andreae, D.A. Andreae.
Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.
Br J Anaesth, 111 (2013), pp. 711-720
[24]
E.L. Poleshuck, J. Katz, C.H. Andrus, L.A. Hogan, B.F. Jung, D.I. Kulick, et al.
Risk factors for chronic pain following breast cancer surgery: a prospective study.
[25]
W.A. Macrae.
Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on.
Br J Anaesth, 101 (2008), pp. 7-86
[26]
K.G. Andersen, H. Kehlet.
Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention.
Pain, 12 (2011), pp. 725-746
[27]
S. López, P. Diéguez, R. Blanco.
Anestesia para cirugía de mama.
Cirugía oncológica de la mama. Técnicas oncoplásticas y reconstructivas, pp. 355-363
[28]
M. Fajardo, S. López, P. Diéguez, P. Alfaro, F.J. García.
Abordaje ecoguiado de las ramas cutáneas de los nervios intercostales a nivel de la línea medio axilar para cirugía no reconstructiva de mama.
Cir May Amb, 18 (2013), pp. 3-6
[29]
Y. Ohgoshi, M. Yokozuka, K. Terajima.
Serratus-intercostal plane block for breast surgery.
Masui, 64 (2015), pp. 610-614
[Japanese]
[30]
R. Madabushi, S. Tewari, S.K. Gautam, A. Agarwal, A. Agarwal.
Serratus anterior plane block: a new analgesic technique for post-thoracotomy pain.
Pain Physician, 18 (2015), pp. E421-E424
asdasdasd
Article options
Tools