Buscar en
Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition) Cardiovascular outcomes in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary i...
Journal Information
Vol. 24. Issue 1 - 4.
Pages 4-8 (January - December 2016)
Vol. 24. Issue 1 - 4.
Pages 4-8 (January - December 2016)
Original Article
Open Access
Cardiovascular outcomes in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a general tertiary hospital
Desfechos cardiovasculares em pacientes tratados com intervenção percutânea coronária primária em hospital geral terciário
Gustavo Neves de Araujoa,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author: Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2.350, CEP: 90035-003, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
, Felipe Homem Vallea, Guilherme Pinheiro Machadob, Fernando Pivatto Jr.a, Bruno Fuhrb, Elvis Pellin Cassolb, Stéfani Marianib, Luis Carlos Corsetti Bergolia, Ana Maria Krepskya, Rodrigo Vugman Wainsteina, Sandro Cadaval Gonçalvesa, Marco Vugman Wainsteina
a Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
b Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (2)
Tables (4)
Table 1. Clinical characteristics.
Table 2. Angiographic and procedural characteristics.
Table 3. In-hospital and 30-day clinical outcomes.
Table 4. Predictors of combined cardiovascular outcomes in 30 days.
Show moreShow less

There are few national data on the results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and registries are a great tool for assessing patient profiles and post-procedure outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe the profile of patients with primary PCI in a general tertiary hospital, as well as to evaluate in-hospital and 30-day cardiovascular outcomes.


The study included all patients submitted to primary PCI between 2012 and 2015. This was a prospective registry, in which the analyzed clinical outcomes were the occurrence of death, infarction, or stroke, and major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).


The study included 323 patients, aged 60 ± 12 years, of whom 66.7% were males, 28.5% diabetics. At admission, 13.5% of the patients were classified as Killip class III/IV. The pain-to-door time was 4.4 ± 2.5hours and the door-to-balloon time was 68.0 ± 34.0minutes. Hospital mortality was 9.9%, and 18.3% of the patients presented MACCE in 30 days.


Patients submitted to primary PCI had high rates of MACCE, which can be attributed to the more severe clinical presentation and to a long time of ischemia. The faster treatment of these patients, a modifiable variable, demands immediate attention from the health system.

Myocardial ischemia
Acute coronary syndrome

Existem poucos dados nacionais a respeito dos resultados da intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) primária, e os registros são uma ótima ferramenta para a avaliação do perfil dos pacientes e dos desfechos pós-procedimento. O objetivo deste estudo foi descrever o perfil dos pacientes com ICP primária em um hospital geral terciário, bem como avaliar os desfechos cardiovasculares hospitalares e em 30 dias.


Foram incluídos todos os pacientes submetidos à ICP primária entre 2012 a 2015. Trata-se de um registro prospectivo, no qual os desfechos clínicos analisados foram a ocorrência de morte, infarto ou acidente vascular cerebral, e eventos cardiovasculares e cerebrovasculares maiores (ECCAM).


Foram incluídos 323 pacientes, com idade 60 ± 12 anos, sendo 66,7% do sexo masculino, 28,5% diabéticos. Na admissão, 13,5% dos pacientes apresentavam-se em Killip III/IV. O tempo dor-porta foi de 4,4 ± 2,5 horas e o tempo porta-balão foi 68,0 ± 34,0 minutos. A mortalidade hospitalar foi de 9,9%, e 18,3% dos pacientes apresentaram ECCAM em 30 dias.


Os pacientes submetidos à ICP primária apresentaram taxas elevadas de ECCAM, que podem ser atribuídas à apresentação clínica mais grave e a um longo tempo de isquemia. Um atendimento mais rápido destes pacientes, variável modificável, demanda uma atenção imediata do sistema de saúde.

Isquemia miocárdica
Síndrome coronariana aguda
Full Text

Ischemic heart disease is one of the main causes of mortality, with rates of 8.8% in Brazil, having already exceeded cerebrovascular diseases in some states.1 Of the clinical manifestations of the disease, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the one that shows higher mortality, despite the therapeutic advance in the last decades aiming to reduce its impact. In the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, in 2015, 9,185 hospital admissions for AMI were recorded, of which 2,297 occurred in Porto Alegre, the capital city.2

It is known that effective AMI treatment, through early reperfusion therapy, is the most important component of the therapeutic arsenal, being crucial for its clinical outcome, reducing the infarction size, preserving ventricular function, and decreasing morbidity and mortality.3 Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently the treatment of choice for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and, when compared to thrombolysis, has shown superior results in both mortality reduction and AMI recurrence.4,5

There are few data on the results of primary PCI in patients treated by the Unified Health System (SUS, acronym in Portuguese), which, due to limited funding, does not use advanced treatments and is likely to show results that are very different from those seen in clinical trials carried out in developed countries. Additionally, the lack of planning and logistics causes patients to be treated at tertiary referral centers at a very late stage, increasing their morbidity and mortality.

This study aimed to describe the clinical, angiographic, and procedural profile of patients submitted to primary PCI treated at a general tertiary hospital, as well as to evaluate in-hospital and 30-day cardiovascular outcomes.

MethodsStudy design and patient selection

This was a prospective registry that included all patients treated with primary PCI in an interventional cardiology unit of a tertiary hospital between 2012 and 2015.

The project was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, and the patients signed the Free and Informed Consent Form. The data were recorded prospectively in appropriate forms, stored in electronic spreadsheets, and subsequently collected in a database.

Periprocedural aspects

Patients were pre-treated with 300mg of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), a loading dose of 600mg of clopidogrel, and 70 to 100 IU/kg of intravenous unfractionated heparin. Use of IIb/IIIa glycoprotein inhibitors, aspiration thrombectomy, and percutaneous intervention strategies (pre-dilation, direct stenting, and post-dilation) were performed at the interventionist's discretion. Anticoagulants were discontinued after the procedure (except in cases with absolute indication), and dual antiplatelet therapy, including ASA 100mg daily and clopidogrel 75mg daily, was recommended for 12 months after the event.

Study outcomes

The analyzed clinical outcomes were death, stroke, reinfarction, or need for emergency revascularization, isolated or combined. Stent thrombosis, contrast-induced nephropathy (relative increase in basal creatinine ≥ 25% and/or ≥ 0.5mg/dL 48 to 72hours post-catheterization),6 class III or IV heart failure (according to the New York Heart Association – NYHA – classification), and angina class III or IV (according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society – CCS – criteria) were also recorded. Clinical follow-up was performed through outpatient consultation or telephone contact.

Angiographic analysis

Coronary angiography was performed using the Axiom Artis equipment (Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlagen, Germany). Angiographic analyses were performed by experienced interventional cardiologists, through visual estimation, in at least two orthogonal projections. The initial and final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow were determined, and the anatomic complexity was assessed using the SYNTAX angiographic score. To calculate the SYNTAX score, each coronary lesion with luminal obstruction > 50% in vessels ≥ 1.5mm was scored and, at the end, all lesions were added in accordance with the specified recommendations.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were described as mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables were shown as absolute and percentage numbers, and compared using the Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.

To perform the multivariate analysis, the isolated effect of each variable was initially investigated by simple logistic regression models (univariate analysis). Subsequently, the variables with p < 0.10 in the univariate analysis were evaluated simultaneously in a multiple logistic regression model (multivariate analysis). For qualitative independent variables, the reference category was considered that with the lowest frequency of complications. The results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and the respective 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

All data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) program, version 17.0.


A total of 323 patients submitted to primary PCI performed at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre from January 2012 to December 2015 were included. The mean age was 60 ± 12 years, 66.7% of the patients were males and 28.5% were diabetics (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics.

Variable  n = 323 
Age, years  60 ± 12 
Male gender, n (%)  215 (66.7) 
White, n (%)  278 (86.2) 
Arterial hypertension, n (%)  205 (63.4) 
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)  92 (28.5) 
Active or previous smoking, n (%)  204 (63.1) 
Previous myocardial infarction, n (%)  28 (8.6) 
Previous stroke, n (%)  19 (5.9) 
Previous use of acetylsalicylic acid, n (%)  68 (21.1) 
Creatinine > 2 mg/dL, n (%)  10 (3.1) 
Transfer time, hours  4.4 ± 2.5 
Door-to-balloon time, minutes  68 ± 34 
Prior myocardial infarction, n (%)  126 (39.0) 
Cardiorespiratory arrest, n (%)  38 (11.9) 
Ejection fraction < 40%, n (%)  51 (15.8) 
Killip class III or IV, n (%)  44 (13.5) 

Patients had a transfer time of 4.4 ± 2.5hours and door-to-balloon time of 68 ± 34minutes. The median ischemia time was 5.1 [3.7-6.9] hours. Of the patients included, 74% were referred from other health units, and 29.3% of them were transferred by the Emergency Mobile Service (SAMU, acronym in Portuguese).

At admission, 11.6% of the patients were classified as Killip class IV, 11.1% required a periprocedural temporary pacemaker, and 4.1% needed an intra-aortic balloon pump. Cardiorespiratory arrest before or after the procedure occurred in 11.9% of the patients.

The radial access was used in 60.1% of cases, with increasing use over the period (from 43.1% in 2012 to 70.1% in 2015) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Access route in the assessed period.


In approximately 57% of the cases, the infarction was located in the inferior wall, and in 40.5% of them the right coronary was the culprit artery. Over half (55.1%) of the patients had more than one vessel with coronary artery disease, of whom 10.9% were treated during the same procedure (ad-hoc) and 31.3% were treated at the same hospital stay.

The mean number of implanted stents was 1.29 ± 0.75. Aspiration thrombectomy was performed in 38.2% of patients during the period, with progressively lower rates over the years (from 81.8% in 2012 to 12% in 2015) (Fig. 2). TIMI 3 flow was obtained in 87.0% of the cases, and TIMI 2 or 3 in 95.9% of the cases (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Use of aspiration thrombectomy throughout the 2012-2015 period.

Table 2.

Angiographic and procedural characteristics.

Variable  n = 323 
Culprit vessel, n (%)   
Left anterior descending artery  135 (41.7) 
Right coronary artery  131 (40.5) 
Left circumflex artery  47 (14.5) 
Left main coronary artery  7 (2.1) 
Saphenous vein bypass  3 (0.9) 
Three-vessel disease, n (%)  75 (23.2) 
SYNTAX score > 23, n (%)  67 (20.7) 
Mean lesion diameter, mm  2.9 ± 0.53 
Mean lesion length, mm  27.5 ± 15 
Pretreatment flow, n (%)   
TIMI 0 or 1  248 (76.7) 
TIMI 2 or 3  75 (23.3) 
Thrombus aspiration, n (%)  123 (38.1) 
Drug-eluting stent, n (%)  12 (3.8) 
Post-procedure TIMI 3, n (%)  281 (87.0) 
Contrast volume, mL  204 ± 93 
Radiation, mGy  2.6 ± 1.3 
Abciximab use, n (%)  149 (46.1) 
No-reflow, n (%)  24 (7.4) 
Distal embolization, n (%)  8 (2.5) 
Re-occlusion, n (%)  4 (1.2) 
Vascular complications, n (%)  7 (2.2) 
Contrast-induced nephropathy, n (%)  36 (11.1) 
Use of pacemaker, n (%)  36 (11.1) 
Use of intra-aortic balloon pump, n (%)  13 (4.1) 

TIMI: Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

The in-hospital mortality rate was 9,9%. When analyzing only those patients who did not have cardiorespiratory arrest and were classified as Killip class I and II on admission, the in-hospital mortality was reduced to 4.3%, compared to 52.8% of patients who had cardiorespiratory arrest and/or were at Killip class III or IV on admission (p < 0.01). During hospitalization, 2.5% of the patients had reinfarction and 2.5% had a stroke.

At the 30-day follow-up, 8.6% of the patients had recurrent angina, and 7.8% required hospital readmission for decompensated heart failure. Combined cardiovascular outcomes occurred in 18.3% of the patients (Table 3). The following variables were predictors of combined cardiovascular outcomes in the present study: left ventricular ejection fraction < 45% (p < 0.01), Killip class III or IV on admission (p < 0.01), as well as the occurrence of cardiorespiratory arrest (p< 0.01), TIMI flow 0 or 1 after PCI (p < 0.01) and contrast-induced nephropathy (p = 0.01). Of these, only reduced coronary flow after the procedure (TIMI flow 0 or 1) was an independent predictor of risk after the multivariate analysis (RR 4.91, 95%CI: 1.40-17.2, p = 0.01) (Table 4).

Table 3.

In-hospital and 30-day clinical outcomes.

Outcomes  n = 323 
Death  32 (9.9) 
Stroke  4 (1.2) 
Reinfarction  8 (2.5) 
MACCE  40 (12.4) 
30-day outcomes (post-discharge)
Death  5 (1.5) 
Stroke  8 (2.5) 
Reinfarction  8 (2.5) 
Target-vessel revascularization  6 (1.9) 
MACCE  19 (5.9) 

MACCE: major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.

Table 4.

Predictors of combined cardiovascular outcomes in 30 days.

Univariate analysis
Variable  p-value 
Age > 75 years  0.23 
Smoking  0.83 
Arterial hypertension  0.07 
Diabetes  0.06 
Ejection fraction < 45%  < 0.01 
Pain-to-door time > 4 hours  0.11 
Pre-hospital admission cardiorespiratory arrest  < 0.01 
Killip III or IV at arrival  < 0.01 
Post-procedure TIMI flow 0 or 1  < 0.01 
Contrast-induced nephropathy  0.01 
Multivariate analysis
Variable  HR  95% CI  p-value 
Post-procedure TIMI flow 0 or 1  4.91  1.40-17.2  0.01 
Ejection fraction < 45%  1.56  0.82-2.96  0.16 
Killip III or IV at arrival  2.33  0.91-5.91  0.07 
Pre-hospital admission cardiorespiratory arrest  1.90  0.87-3.04  0.87 
Contrast-induced nephropathy  1.91  0.76-4.78  0.16 

TIMI: Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; HR: hazard ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.


Much of the data regarding primary PCI comes from randomized controlled trials with strict patient control. The extrapolation of these data into the real world might not be representative, especially in a healthcare system with limited resources such as SUS.7,8

In the present study, patients presented a very high baseline risk, greater severity of clinical signs on admission, and higher morbidity and mortality (11.5% of patients in Killip class IV), in addition to a large number of patients with multivessel disease, resulting in high rates of combined cardiovascular outcomes. When comparing the present data with a French registry of patients with STEMI,9 the rates of hypertension (63% vs. 47%), diabetes (18% vs. 28%), smokers (52% vs. 43%), and previous history of stroke (6% vs. 3%) were higher in the present study. Although the angiographic success rate after the procedure (defined as TIMI flow 2 or 3) was 95.9%, similar to that found in large AMI registries,8–11 the morbidity and mortality rates in the present study were higher, probably due to the increased risk profile of the patients. When analyzing only those patients who did not have cardiorespiratory arrest and who were classified as Killip class I and II on admission, in-hospital mortality decreased to 4.3%, similar to the aforementioned registries. Although the clinical presentation in Killip class III or IV on admission was not an independent predictor of combined cardiovascular outcomes, a statistical trend was observed; it is likely that this variable would become significant with a larger sample. A matter of concern observed in the present study, which may be related to the higher severity and worse prognosis of patients, was the long period between the symptom onset and coronary reperfusion. It is known that the time of myocardial ischemia is related to myocardial viability after reperfusion and subsequent clinical outcomes.3 A recent study corroborated these data by showing an increase in long-term mortality, mainly in patients with anterior AMI and ischemia time > 114minutes.12 The mean time of ischemia in the present study was 5.5hours, approximately 2hours longer than that seen in the studies conducted in developed countries.8–11 In addition to having a poorly organized AMI treatment network concerning referrals and referral hospitals, healthcare units do not have fibrinolytic agents, which could allow prompt coronary reperfusion and reduce adverse outcomes. Moreover, prehospital thrombolysis is known to be beneficial, improving outcomes and cost-effectiveness.13 Caluza et al.14 showed a reduction in mortality in patients with AMI treated in a municipal treatment network with electrocardiogram interpretation by telemedicine and prehospital thrombolysis. Although the incidence of AMI in the metropolitan region of Porto Alegre has remained stable in recent years,1 the increase in the number of cases in the last year of the analysis (50% higher in 2015 than in 2014) is probably due to healthcare system failures, with a scarcity of funds and consequent closing/restriction of other cardiologic emergency units in this city.

This analysis also showed a change in institutional practices, in accordance with the innovations presented in the literature. During the study period, there was an important increase in the use of radial access when performing PCI. In 2012, the RIFLE13 study was published, reporting a reduction in mortality with the radial access route in patients with STEMI. In 2012, the rate of radial access in the cases included in the present study was 41.9% and it increased to 61.5% in the following year; currently, it is around 70%. Another important data from the analysis was the significant reduction in the performance of aspiration thrombectomy. The rates, which were 83% in 2012, decreased significantly in 2014, following the publication of the TASTE15 study, which suggested the non-effectiveness of the device as an adjuvant in primary PCI. In 2014, the TOTAL16 study was published, which showed an increase in stroke rates without reducing other outcomes with routine thrombectomy. Currently, the procedure is still performed in 12% of patients, because, as recommended by AMI guidelines,17,18 the method can still be performed in selected cases (high thrombotic load and slowed coronary flow).

Study limitations

The present study has limitations that are inherent to observational studies. Some data were obtained retrospectively and others through telephone contact, which may indicate less reliable information. Moreover, there were limitations due to the relatively small sample size and the short follow-up. However, this study was a registry of consecutive and unselected patients from a tertiary referral hospital for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, so the data shown here are highly applicable to daily clinical practice.


In the present study, patients submitted to primary percutaneous coronary intervention had high rates of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, which can be attributed to the more severe clinical presentation on admission and delayed start of reperfusion therapy. Therefore, faster and more adequate patient care, considering it is a modifiable variable, demands immediate attention from the healthcare system.

Funding sources

Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa e Eventos of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Informática do SUS (DATASUS). Informações de saúde. Estatísticas vitais [Internet]. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2016 [cited 2016 Jan 30]. Available from:
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Informática do SUS (DATASUS). Morbidade Hospitalar do SUS – Por Local de Internação – Rio Grande do Sul [Internet]. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2016 [cited 2016 Jan 31]. Available from:
E. Boersma, A.C. Maas, J.W. Deckers, M.L. Simoons.
Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour.
Lancet., 348 (1996), pp. 771-775
W.D. Weaver, R.J. Simes, A. Betriu, C.L. Grines, F. Zijlstra, E. Garcia, et al.
Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review.
JAMA., 278 (1997), pp. 2093-2098
E.C. Keeley, J.A. Boura, C.L. Grines.
Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.
R. Mehran, E.D. Aymong, E. Nikolsky, Z. Lasic, I. Iakovou, M. Fahy, et al.
A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 44 (2004), pp. 1393-1399
N. Sharpe.
Clinical trials and the real world: selection bias and generalisability of trial results.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther., 16 (2002), pp. 75-77
E. Freisinger, T. Fuerstenberg, N.M. Malyar, J. Wellmann, U. Keil, G. Breithardt, et al.
German nationwide data on current trends and management of acute myocardial infarction: discrepancies between trials and real-life.
Eur Heart J., 35 (2014), pp. 979-988
N. Danchin, E. Puymirat, F.G. Steg, P. Goldstein, F. Schiele, F. Belle, FAST-MI 2005 Investigators, et al.
Five-year survival in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction according to modalities of reperfusion therapy: the French Registry on Acute ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 Cohort.
Circulation., 129 (2014), pp. 1629-1636
S.C. Chung, R. Gedeborg, O. Nicholas, S. James, A. Jeppsson, C. Wolfe, et al.
Acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of short-term survival in national outcome registries in Sweden and the UK.
Lancet., 383 (2014), pp. 1305-1312
S. Kohsaka, H. Miyata, I. Ueda, F.A. Masoudi, E.D. Peterson, al. Maekawa Yet, JCD-KICS and NCDR.
An international comparison of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A collaborative study of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) and Japan Cardiovascular Database-Keio interhospital Cardiovascular Studies (JCD-KiCS).
Am Heart J., 170 (2015), pp. 1077-1085
S. Postma, J.E. Dambrink, M. Gosselink, J.P. Ottervanger, E. Kolkman, J.M. Ten Berg, et al.
The influence of system delay on 30-day and long term mortality in patients with anterior versus non-anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a cohort study.
Open Heart., 2 (2015), pp. e000201
E. Romagnoli, G. Biondi-Zoccai, A. Sciahbasi, L. Politi, S. Rigattieri, G. Pendenza, et al.
Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 60 (2012), pp. 2481-2489
A.C. Caluza, A.H. Barbosa, I. Gonçalves, C.A. Oliveira, L.N. Matos, C. Zeefried, et al.
ST-Elevation myocardial infarction network: systematization in 205 cases reduced clinical events in the public health care system.
Arq Bras Cardiol., 99 (2012), pp. 1040-1048
O. Fröbert, B. Lagerqvist, G.K. Olivecrona, E. Omerovic, T. Gudnason, M. Maeng, TASTE Trial, et al.
Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
N Engl J Med, 369 (2013), pp. 1587-1597
S.S. Jolly, J.A. Cairns, S. Yusuf, B. Meeks, J. Pogue, M.J. Rokoss, TOTAL Investigators, et al.
Randomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomy.
N Engl J Med., 372 (2015), pp. 1389-1398
Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)1, Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blömstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2569-619.
American College of Emergency Physicians; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA et al., 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):e78-140.

Peer review under the responsibility of Sociedade Brasileira de Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia Intervencionista.

Copyright © 2016. Sociedade Brasileira de Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia Intervencionista
Article options