metricas

Radiología (English Edition)

Suggestions
Radiología (English Edition) Safety of regadenoson for vasodilation in cardiac MRI stress tests
Journal Information
Vol. 62. Issue 3.
Pages 165-248 (May - June 2020)
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
3773
Vol. 62. Issue 3.
Pages 165-248 (May - June 2020)
Original articles

Safety of regadenoson for vasodilation in cardiac MRI stress tests

Seguridad del empleo de regadenosón como fármaco vasodilatador en resonancia magnética cardíaca de estrés
Visits
3773
G. Bastarrikaa,
Corresponding author
bastarrika@unav.es

Corresponding author.
, A. Ezpondaa, A. García Baizana, M. Calvoa, J.C. Pueyoa, J.J. Gavirab, M. Caballerosc
a Servicio de Radiología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
b Departamento de Cardiología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
c Servicio de Radiología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Abstract
Objective

To determine the safety of regadenoson for vasodilation in cardiac MRI stress tests to detect myocardial ischemia.

Material and methods

We retrospectively analyzed cardiac MRI studies done in 120 patients (mean age, 67±11.6 years; 88 men) with suspected ischemic heart disease or known coronary disease who had clinical indications for cardiac MRI stress tests. All studies were done on a 1.5T scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthineers) using regadenoson (5ml, 0.4mg) for vasodilation. We recorded cardiovascular risk factors, medications, and indications for the test as well as vital signs at rest and under stress and the symptoms and adverse effects induced by the drug.

Results

No symptoms developed in 52.6 % of patients. The most common symptoms were central chest pain (25 %) and dyspnea (12 %). At peak stress, the mean increase in heart rate was 23.9±11.4 beats per minute and the mean decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 7.1±18.8mmHg and 5.3±9.2mmHg, respectively (p< 0.001). The response to regadenoson was less pronounced in obese and diabetic patients. The increase in heart rate was greater in symptomatic patients (27.4 ± 11.2 bpm vs. 20.6 ± 10.7 bpm in asymptomatic patients, p= 0.001). No severe adverse effects were observed.

Conclusion

Regadenoson is well tolerated and can be safely used for cardiac MRI stress tests.

Keywords:
Magnetic resonance imaging
Heart
Regadenoson
Coronary disease
Myocardial ischemia
Resumen
Objetivo

Describir la seguridad del regadenosón como fármaco vasodilatador en estudios de resonancia magnética cardíaca (RMC) de estrés realizados para detectar isquemia miocárdica.

Material y métodos

Se analizaron de manera retrospectiva los estudios de 120 pacientes (88 varones, edad media 67±11,6 años) con sospecha de cardiopatía isquémica o con enfermedad coronaria conocida e indicación clínica para RMC de estrés. Los estudios se realizaron en un equipo de 1,5Tesla (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthineers) empleando regadenosón (5ml, 0,4mg) como agente vasodilatador. En todos los pacientes se recogieron los factores de riesgo cardiovascular, fármacos que tomaban e indicación de la prueba, además de las constantes vitales en situación de reposo y bajo estrés y los síntomas y efectos adversos inducidos por el fármaco.

Resultados

El 52.6% de los pacientes permanecieron asintomáticos. Los síntomas más frecuentes fueron la opresión centrotorácica (25%) y la disnea (12%). Durante el pico de estrés, el incremento medio de la frecuencia cardíaca fue de 23,9±11,4 lpm y el descenso medio de la presión arterial sistólica y diastólica de 7,1±18,8mmHg y 5,3±9,2mmHg, respectivamente (p< 0,001). En pacientes obesos y diabéticos se objetivó menor respuesta hemodinámica al regadenosón, mientras que los pacientes sintomáticos presentaron mayor incremento de la frecuencia cardíaca (27,4 ± 11,2 lpm frente a 20,6 ± 10,7 lpm, p= 0,001). No se evidenció ningún efecto adverso grave.

Conclusión

El regadenosón es un fármaco bien tolerado que se puede utilizar con seguridad en RMC de estrés.

Palabras clave:
Resonancia magnética
Corazón
Regadenosón
Enfermedad coronaria
Isquemia miocárdica

Article

These are the options to access the full texts of the publication Radiología (English Edition)
Subscriber
Subscriber

If you already have your login data, please click here .

If you have forgotten your password you can you can recover it by clicking here and selecting the option “I have forgotten my password”
Purchase
Purchase article

Purchasing article the PDF version will be downloaded

Purchase now
Contact
Phone for subscriptions and reporting of errors
From Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. (GMT + 1) except for the months of July and August which will be from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Calls from Spain
932 415 960
Calls from outside Spain
+34 932 415 960
E-mail
References
[1]
G. Montalescot, U. Sechtem, S. Achenbach, F. Andreotti, C. Arden, A. Budaj, et al.
2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology.
Eur Heart J., 34 (2013), pp. 2949-3003
[2]
S. Windecker, P. Kolh, F. Alfonso, J.-P. Collet, J. Cremer, V. Falk, et al.
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).
Eur Heart J., 35 (2014), pp. 2541-2619
[3]
I. Danad, J. Szymonifka, J.W.R. Twisk, B.L. Norgaard, C.K. Zarins, P. Knaapen, et al.
Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis.
Eur Heart J., 38 (2017), pp. 991-998
[4]
O. Bruder, A. Wagner, M. Lombardi, J. Schwitter, A. van Rossum, G. Pilz, et al.
European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (EuroCMR) registry--multi national results from 57 centers in 15 countries.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson., 15 (2013), pp. 9
[5]
G.J. Zoghbi, A.E. Iskandrian.
Selective adenosine agonists and myocardial perfusion imaging.
J Nucl Cardiol., 19 (2012), pp. 126-141
[6]
M. Beretta, F. Mut.
Pruebas de estrés farmacológico en cardiología nuclear.
Rev Urug Cardiol., 24 (2009), pp. 112-125
[7]
W. Al Jaroudi, A.E. Iskandrian.
Regadenoson: A New Myocardial Stress Agent.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 54 (2009), pp. 1123-1130
[8]
B.M. Prenner, S. Bukofzer, S. Behm, K. Feaheny, B.E. McNutt.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and tolerability of regadenoson in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
J Nucl Cardiol., 19 (2012), pp. 681-692
[9]
K.-L. Nguyen, W.P. Bandettini, S. Shanbhag, S.W. Leung, J.R. Wilson, A.E. Arai.
Safety and tolerability of regadenoson CMR.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging., 15 (2014), pp. 753-760
[10]
W.G. Hundley, D. Bluemke, J.G. Bogaert, M.G. Friedrich, C.B. Higgins, M.A. Lawson, et al.
Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance guidelines for reporting cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson., 11 (2009), pp. 5
[11]
N. Kawel-Boehm, A. Maceira, E.R. Valsangiacomo-Buechel, J. Vogel-Claussen, E.B. Turkbey, R. Williams, et al.
Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson., 17 (2015), pp. 29
[12]
R.M. Lang, L.P. Badano, V. Mor-Avi, J. Afilalo, A. Armstrong, L. Ernande, et al.
Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr., 28 (2015),
[13]
M.D. Cerqueira, N.J. Weissman, V. Dilsizian, A.K. Jacobs, S. Kaul, W.K. Laskey, et al.
Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.
Circulation., 105 (2002), pp. 539-542
[14]
R.C. Hendel, T.M. Bateman, M.D. Cerqueira, A.E. Iskandrian, J.A. Leppo, B. Blackburn, et al.
Initial clinical experience with regadenoson, a novel selective A2A agonist for pharmacologic stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 46 (2005), pp. 2069-2075
[15]
2013 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology / MedAxiom Nuclear Survey.
J Nucl Cardiol., 21 (2014), pp. 5-88
[16]
http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/es_ES/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/001176/WC500097100.pdf.
[17]
S. Vasu, W.P. Bandettini, L.-Y. Hsu, P. Kellman, S. Leung, C. Mancini, et al.
Regadenoson and adenosine are equivalent vasodilators and are superior than dipyridamole- a study of first pass quantitative perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson., 15 (2013), pp. 85
[18]
M.D. Cerqueira, M.S. Verani, M. Schwaiger, J. Heo, A.S. Iskandrian.
Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 23 (1994), pp. 384-389
[19]
A. Ranhosky, J. Kempthorne-Rawson.
The safety of intravenous dipyridamole thallium myocardial perfusion imaging. Intravenous Dipyridamole Thallium Imaging Study Group.
Circulation., 81 (1990), pp. 1205-1209
[20]
A. Kidambi, S. Sourbron, N. Maredia, M. Motwani, J.M. Brown, J. Nixon, et al.
Factors associated with false-negative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion studies: A Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary artery disease (CE-MARC) substudy.
J Magn Reson Imaging., 43 (2016), pp. 566-573
[21]
R.K. Mishra, S. Dorbala, G. Logsetty, A. Hassan, T. Heinonen, H.R. Schelbert, et al.
Quantitative relation between hemodynamic changes during intravenous adenosine infusion and the magnitude of coronary hyperemia: implications for myocardial perfusion imaging.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 45 (2005), pp. 553-558
[22]
F.G. Hage, P. Dean, V. Bhatia, F. Iqbal, J. Heo, A.E. Iskandrian.
The prognostic value of the heart rate response to adenosine in relation to diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease.
Am Heart J., 162 (2011), pp. 356-362
[23]
F.G. Hage, G. Perry, J. Heo, A.E. Iskandrian.
Blunting of the heart rate response to adenosine and regadenoson in relation to hyperglycemia and the metabolic syndrome.
Am J Cardiol., 105 (2010), pp. 839-843
[24]
F.G. Hage, J. Heo, B. Franks, L. Belardinelli, B. Blackburn, W. Wang, et al.
Differences in heart rate response to adenosine and regadenoson in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.
Am Heart J., 157 (2009), pp. 771-776
[25]
F.G. Hage, P. Dean, F. Iqbal, J. Heo, A.E. Iskandrian.
A blunted heart rate response to regadenoson is an independent prognostic indicator in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.
J Nucl Cardiol., 18 (2011), pp. 1086-1094
[26]
E.V.R. DiBella, J.U. Fluckiger, L. Chen, T.H. Kim, N.A. Pack, B. Matthews, et al.
The effect of obesity on regadenoson-induced myocardial hyperemia: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging., 28 (2012), pp. 1435-1444
[27]
M. Motwani, P.P. Swoboda, S. Plein, J.P. Greenwood.
Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease.
[28]
S. Denevich, S. Kothari, J. Spalding, K. Riggs, L. Boulanger.
PCV88 Economic evaluation of the use of regadenoson in myocardial perfusion imaging: cardiovascular laboratory perspectives.
Value Heal., 13 (2010), pp. A166
asdasdasd
Article options
Tools