metricas
covid
Buscar en
Neurology perspectives
Toda la web
Inicio Neurology perspectives Analysis of medication persistence and reasons for discontinuation of treatment ...
Journal Information
Vol. 2. Issue 3.
Pages 168-170 (July - September 2022)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 2. Issue 3.
Pages 168-170 (July - September 2022)
Scientific letter
Full text access
Analysis of medication persistence and reasons for discontinuation of treatment with teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate in a hospital series of patients with multiple sclerosis
Análisis de la persistencia y de las causas de abandono del tratamiento con teriflunomida y dimetilfumarato en una serie hospitalaria de pacientes con esclerosis múltiple
Visits
1333
D.A. García Estévez1,2,
Corresponding author
, L. Cid Conde3, A. Juanatey García1,2
1 Servicio de Neurología. Complexo hospitalario Universitario de Ourense.
2 Grupo de Neurociencias Clínica. Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias Galicia Sur (IIS Galicia Sur). SERGAS-UVIGO.
3 Servicio de Farmacia. Complexo hospitalario Universitario de Ourense.
Related content
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (1)
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the treatment groups.
Additional material (1)
Full Text

Dear Editor:

Medication persistence is defined as the time of continuous therapy, from initiation of treatment to its discontinuation.1 Factors conditioning medication persistence include treatment effectiveness, complexity of dosage, adverse effects, impact on patient lifestyle, patient motivation, quality of the information provided by the healthcare staff on the condition, and need for treatment after onset.2,3 Lack of adherence to and persistence of treatments prescribed by healthcare professionals translates into reduced treatment effectiveness and increased healthcare costs.

Several studies using data from medical records and databases have assessed the persistence of treatments in multiple sclerosis (MS), and generally conclude that oral treatments are more persistent than injectable treatments.4,5 These real-world studies also report lower persistence than that described in clinical trials, undoubtedly due to differences between our patients and those included in clinical trials; persistence is largely influenced by the presence of various comorbidities in real-life patients.

The aim of our study was to determine the persistence of first-line oral treatments for MS, teriflunomide (TERI) or dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and the reasons for discontinuation in a hospital series. The study was approved by the research ethics committee of the Galicia-Sur Health Research Institute.

We requested that our hospital’s pharmacy department provide access to the registry of patients who started treatment with TERI or DMF for MS between 1 June 2015 and 31 October 2021. We identified 125 patients who started treatment with TERI and 77 patients with DMF. The baseline characteristics of each group are shown in Table 1. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistics software. P-values < .05 were considered statistically significant. Medication persistence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, which were compared with the Mantel-Cox test (log rank test).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the treatment groups.

  TERIFLUNOMIDE (n = 125)  DIMETHYL FUMARATE (n = 77)  P 
Sex (M/W)  34/91  16/71  NS 
Age at diagnosis (years)  37.0 (10.8)  32.3 (8.2)  < .01 
MS progression time from diagnosis (months)  110.6 (102.7)  57.3 (74.9)  < .001 
Age at treatment onset (years)  45.8 (10.4)  37.1 (8.5)  < .001 
EDSS score at treatment onset  2.12 (1.72)  1.54 (1.12)  < .001 
Previous treatment with disease-modifying drugs, n (%)  85 (68%)  39 (50.6%)  .015 
Treatment indication, n (%)
  • -

    Disease activity

 
87 (69.6%)  66 (85.7%)  .011 
  • -

    Convenience

 
38 (30.4%)  11 (14.3%)   

Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation), unless other wise indicated.

EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; MS: Multiple sclerosis; NS: not significant.

Relapses, new MRI lesion, progression.

Clinically stable patient who wishes to switch from an injectable to an oral drug.

Of the patients receiving TERI, 39 (31.2%) discontinued treatment; disease activity (relapse, radiological activity, or progression) was the reason for discontinuation in 21.6% of cases, and adverse reactions in 8%. Of the patients receiving DMF, 29 (37.7%) discontinued treatment; the reason for discontinuation was clinical/radiological activity in 7.8% of cases and adverse reactions in 26%. The difference in the reasons for discontinuation between groups was statistically significant (P < .01), with disease activity being the most frequent reason in the TERI group and presence of adverse reactions being more common in the DMF group. Fig. 1 shows the Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysing medication persistence with TERI and DMF. At 60 months, persistence in the TERI group (61%) is slightly higher than in the DMF group (55%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .13). One limitation of this real-world study is that the 2 treatment groups presented different baseline characteristics.

Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier survival curve.

(0.23MB).

Lymphocytopaenia was the reason for discontinuation in up to 50% of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse reactions to DMF, but was not recorded in any patient receiving TERI. This differential profile between TERI and DMF has led us to consider TERI as the ideal treatment for switching from injectable drugs to oral drugs for the convenience of patients who have remained clinically and radiologically stable, in whom safety and tolerability take priority over anti-inflammatory power due to the low level of inflammatory activity observed in these patients.6 Another characteristic to be considered when switching drugs is the potential effect of TERI in slowing brain atrophy.7,8 Likewise, patients presenting greater clinical/radiological activity may be treated with DMF, as demonstrated by propensity score studies that support the effectiveness of DMF over TERI.9,10

Persistence is a complex concept involving effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of treatment as well as patient satisfaction, and should be considered a measure of treatment efficiency.

Sources of funding

  • -

    None.

Conflicts of interest

Dr García Estévez has received fees from Sanofi in relation to product presentations (teriflunomide) and from Biogen for participating in an advisory board (dimethyl fumarate).

Appendix A
Supplementary data

Supplementary material

References
[1.]
J.A. Cramer, A. Roy, A. Burrell, C.J. Fairchild, M.J. Fuldeore, D.A. Ollendorf, et al.
Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions.
Value Health, 11 (2008), pp. 44-47
[2.]
A. Ben-Zacharia, M. Adamson, A. Boyd, P. Hardeman, J. Smrtka, B. Walker, et al.
Impact of share decision making on disease-modifying drug adherence in multiple sclerosis.
Int J MS Care, 20 (2018), pp. 287-297
[3.]
M. Tintoré, M. Alexander, K. Costello, M. Duddy, D.E. Jones, N. Law, et al.
The state of multiple sclerosis: current insight into the patient/health care provider relationship, treatment challenges, and satisfaction.
Patient Prefer Adherence, 11 (2017), pp. 33-45
[4.]
P. Vermersch, L. Suchet, R. Colamarino, C. Laurendeau, B. Detournay.
An analysis of first-line disease-modifying therapies in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis using the French nationwide health claims database from 2014-2017.
Mult Scler Relat Disord, (2020),
[5.]
S. Lahdenperä, M. Soilu-Hänninen, H.-M. Kuusisto, S. Atyla, J. Junnila, A. Berglund.
Medication adherence/persistence among patients with active multiple sclerosis in Finland.
Acta Neurol Scand, (2020),
[6.]
D.A. García-Estévez.
Hematological Alterations Related to Treatment with Teriflunomide and Dimethyl Fumarate in Multiple Sclerosis.
NeuroSci, 1 (2020), pp. 17-23
[7.]
T. Sprenger, L. Kappos, E.-W. Radue, L. Gaetano, N. Mueller-Lenke, J. Wuerfel, et al.
Association of brain volume loss and long-term disability outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with teriflunomide.
Mult Scler, 26 (2020), pp. 1207-1216
[8.]
D.A. García-Estévez.
Esclerosis múltiple benigna, edad avanzada y deterioro cognitivo: ¿una tríada clínica adecuada para el tratamiento con teriflunomida?.
Neurology Perspectives, 1 (2021), pp. 189-191
[9.]
S. Braune, S. Grimm, P. Van Hövell, U. Freudensprung, F. Pellegrini, R. Hyde, et al.
Comparative effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate versus interferon, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or fingolimod: Results from the German NeuroTransData registry.
J. Neurol., 265 (2018), pp. 2980-2992
[10.]
S. Condé, X. Moisset, B. Pereira, M. Zuel, R. Colamarino, M. Maillet-Vioud, et al.
Dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis in a real-life setting: A French retrospective cohort study.
Eur. J. Neurol., 26 (2018), pp. 460-467
Copyright © 2022. Sociedad Española de Neurología
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos