Tienda Elsevier
Regístrese
metricas
covid
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation improves word production in Conduction A...
Journal Information
Back to article

Statistics

Follow this link to access the full text of the article

CLINICAL CASES
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation improves word production in Conduction Aphasia: Electroencephalographic and behavioral evidences
La Estimulación de Corriente Directa Transcraneal mejora la producción de palabras en la afasía: evidencias electroencefalográficas y conductuales
Alberto Domingueza,
Corresponding author
adomin@ull.es

Corresponding author at:. Facultad de Psicología. Campus de Guajara. 38004, La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
, Rosario Socasa, Hipolito Marreroa, Nieves Leona,b, Jesus LLabresc, Enrique Enriquezb,c
a Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de La Laguna, Spain
b Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Spain
c Clínica INSTRAL, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Read
6576
Times
was read the article
2357
Total PDF
4219
Total HTML
Share statistics
Article information
ISSN: 16972600
Original language: English
DOI:10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.02.001
The statistics are updated each day
Year/Month Html Pdf Total
2025 12 28 10 38
2025 11 87 37 124
2025 10 37 32 69
2025 9 45 27 72
2025 8 32 33 65
2025 7 61 29 90
2025 6 54 12 66
2025 5 42 21 63
2025 4 25 19 44
2025 3 30 14 44
2025 2 28 14 42
2025 1 32 22 54
2024 12 29 15 44
2024 11 33 16 49
2024 10 21 19 40
2024 9 32 14 46
2024 8 28 14 42
2024 7 16 20 36
2024 6 31 11 42
2024 5 32 9 41
2024 4 35 10 45
2024 3 41 11 52
2024 2 34 24 58
2024 1 20 15 35
2023 12 37 16 53
2023 11 45 22 67
2023 10 44 18 62
2023 9 23 5 28
2023 8 25 8 33
2023 7 18 20 38
2023 6 43 9 52
2023 5 63 26 89
2023 4 57 21 78
2023 3 45 9 54
2023 2 40 8 48
2023 1 53 9 62
2022 12 42 19 61
2022 11 46 15 61
2022 10 43 23 66
2022 9 40 24 64
2022 8 26 20 46
2022 7 20 19 39
2022 6 20 14 34
2022 5 39 15 54
2022 4 28 14 42
2022 3 37 24 61
2022 2 39 16 55
2022 1 31 27 58
2021 12 19 20 39
2021 11 31 13 44
2021 10 38 24 62
2021 9 31 32 63
2021 8 22 19 41
2021 7 22 12 34
2021 6 16 17 33
2021 5 34 16 50
2021 4 84 29 113
2021 3 63 12 75
2021 2 14 10 24
2021 1 26 14 40
2020 12 49 18 67
2020 11 28 9 37
2020 10 20 6 26
2020 9 15 9 24
2020 8 22 17 39
2020 7 19 10 29
2020 6 20 15 35
2020 5 19 18 37
2020 4 14 6 20
2020 3 22 5 27
2020 2 30 15 45
2020 1 23 13 36
2019 12 16 12 28
2019 11 11 8 19
2019 10 17 11 28
2019 9 25 11 36
2019 8 18 7 25
2019 7 23 11 34
2019 6 30 30 60
2019 5 93 31 124
2019 4 86 13 99
2019 3 17 9 26
2019 2 20 11 31
2019 1 16 12 28
2018 12 9 8 17
2018 11 16 3 19
2018 10 10 6 16
2018 9 17 15 32
2018 8 18 7 25
2018 7 14 16 30
2018 6 10 8 18
2018 5 21 18 39
2018 4 14 10 24
2018 3 13 2 15
2018 2 20 2 22
2018 1 14 7 21
2017 12 13 2 15
2017 11 41 5 46
2017 10 22 9 31
2017 9 14 8 22
2017 8 16 7 23
2017 7 18 7 25
2017 6 35 23 58
2017 5 32 7 39
2017 4 27 21 48
2017 3 24 77 101
2017 2 20 6 26
2017 1 26 6 32
2016 12 24 9 33
2016 11 48 5 53
2016 10 47 13 60
2016 9 26 9 35
2016 8 30 17 47
2016 7 36 3 39
2016 6 24 35 59
2016 5 27 28 55
2016 4 40 34 74
2016 3 38 34 72
2016 2 28 31 59
2016 1 24 37 61
2015 12 37 32 69
2015 11 28 12 40
2015 10 31 17 48
2015 9 20 17 37
2015 8 55 29 84
2015 7 32 13 45
2015 6 11 31 42
2015 5 38 27 65
2015 4 31 32 63
2015 3 29 23 52
2015 2 31 10 41
2015 1 23 20 43
2014 12 41 33 74
2014 11 35 37 72
2014 10 46 40 86
2014 9 30 33 63
2014 8 34 35 69
2014 7 1 7 8
Show all

Follow this link to access the full text of the article

Subscribe to our newsletter

Publish in
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
Rates of rejection (2020)