Buscar en
European Journal of Psychiatry
Toda la web
Inicio European Journal of Psychiatry The importance of assessing the self-reported impact of COVID-19 on clinician me...
Journal Information
Vol. 34. Issue 4.
Pages 223-224 (October - December 2020)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
305
Vol. 34. Issue 4.
Pages 223-224 (October - December 2020)
Letters to the Editor
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpsy.2020.06.002
Full text access
The importance of assessing the self-reported impact of COVID-19 on clinician mental health
Visits
...
A.K. Kapilaa,
Corresponding author
ayush.kapila@uzbrussel.be

Corresponding author.
, A. Ramb, L. D’Uvab, Y. Faridb, M. Talibb,c
a Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Belgium
b Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Belgium
c Department of Psychiatry, Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Full Text
Dear Editor,

The COVID-19 pandemic will forever be etched in history as a landmark moment. With its profound impact on healthcare, clinicians have felt its draining effect. Early reports have suggested marked physical and psychological sequalae among patients and clinicians,1–3 and our experience from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus has illustrated the far-reaching short- and long-term psychological consequences of such disasters.4 Clinicians will require increased psychological support, and understanding how the pandemic has affected us will be essential in preparing our mental health services. It is for this reason, we aimed to understand the self-reported psychological impact of COVID-19 on clinicians by using validated depression and anxiety scales. We wanted to evaluate how frontline duties and a previous mental health history can impact us during this crisis.

A 25-question survey was designed by a panel of multidisciplinary clinicians across two universities. Objective and validated scales were used to ensure appropriate analysis, i.e. the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Score (GAD-7).5 The survey was limited to a private social media group of medical doctors in Belgium. Participants were divided into two groups: those who self-reported to be in the frontline of care, i.e. working on COVID-19 units, intensive care and the emergency department, and those who reported to be working in healthcare but not in the frontline. The questionnaire was divided into three broad sections: demographic data, PHQ-9 and GAD-7.

490 clinicians filled in the questionnaire, of which 33% were working in the frontline. 70% of them were under 40, compared to 51% of non-frontline clinicians. 23% of frontline workers and 19% of non-frontline workers had had previous psychiatric follow-up respectively. The PHQ-9 score averaged 9.8 for the frontline group compared to 9.2 for the non-frontline group (p=0.3, unpaired t-test). In frontline staff, 51% had a score of 10 or more, reflecting at least moderate depression. This was in comparison to 45% in non-frontline staff (Fig. 1). The GAD-7 score averaged 8.4 for frontline clinicians compared to 7.8 non-frontline (p=0.3, unpaired t-test). 40% of frontline doctors had a score of 10 or more, reflecting at least moderate anxiety. In non-frontline staff, the proportion having a score of 10 or more was lower, i.e. 34% (Fig. 2). Subgroup analysis showed that when measuring respondents with prior psychiatric history, the PHQ-9 score was 12.4 in the frontline group, and 13.4 in the non-frontline group. The difference in scores between groups with and without prior psychiatric history was significant (p<0.001, unpaired t-test). The GAD-7 score was 10.8 in the frontline group, and 11.5 in the non-frontline group. The difference between groups with and without previous psychiatric history was again significant (p<0.001, unpaired t-test).

Figure 1.

Patient Health Questionnaire Score (PHQ9). The PHQ9 is a self-reported measure used to assess the severity of depression. The total scores are categorized as follows: minimal/no depression (0–4), mild depression (5–9), moderate depression (10–14), moderately severe depression (15–19), or severe depression (20–27). In frontline staff, 51% of staff had a score of 10 or more, reflecting at least moderate depression. This was in comparison to 45% in non-frontline staff.

(0.19MB).
Figure 2.

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Score (GAD7). The GAD7 is a self-rated scale to evaluate the severity of anxiety and has good reliability and validity. The total scores are categorized as follows: minimal/no anxiety (0–4), mild anxiety (5–9), moderate anxiety (10–14), or severe anxiety (15–21). 40% of frontline doctors had a score of 10 or more, reflecting at least moderate anxiety. In non-frontline staff, the proportion having a score of 10 or more was lower, i.e. 34%.

(0.15MB).

The COVID-19 pandemic will likely change the mental health landscape for times to come. We performed a snapshot of the acute mental health effects on clinicians as a consequence of COVID-19. We note that there are higher percentages of clinicians having at least moderate anxiety and depression in the frontline group, however the difference is not significant. Nonetheless, the impact of frontline work may be felt later on in the form of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, and future studies are necessary to evaluate this. Past mental health history was found to be a significant factor in higher depression and anxiety scores. This is an important point and shows that there is an increased vulnerability for this group requiring early support. Continuous mental health and pastoral care is essential to safeguard the psychological welfare of all staff, and early identification of at-risk staff is required. This can be done by ensuring psychological services are easily available for hospital staff. This can be done in person or by virtual consulting and telehealth. Clinician-reported statistics can help in designing the psychological support network and will be useful in strategizing our mental health resources for the impact of this pandemic and similar disasters in the future. It is only by ensuring our doctors are physically and psychologically well that we would be able to provide optimal care for our patients.

Level of evidence: III

Ethical considerations

Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained.

Funding

No funding was sought nor provided for this article.

Conflict of interest

None to declare by the authors.

References
[1]
Y.T. Xiang, Y. Yang, W. Li, L. Zhang, Q. Zhang, T. Cheung, et al.
Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed.
Lancet Psychiatr, 7 (2020), pp. 228-229
[2]
A.K. Kapila, Y. Farid, V. Kapila, M. Schettino, M. Vanhoeij, M. Hamdi.
The perspective of surgical residents on current and future training in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
[3]
H. Ji, L. Li, T. Huang, Y. Zhu.
Nosocomial infections in psychiatric hospitals during the new coronavirus pneumonia outbreak.
[4]
A.M. Lee, J.G. Wong, G.M. McAlonan, V. Cheung, C. Cheung, et al.
Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak.
Can J Psychiatry, 52 (2007), pp. 233-240
[5]
K. Kroenke, R.L. Spitzer, J.B.W. Williams, B. Löwe.
The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 32 (2010), pp. 345-359
Copyright © 2020. Asociación Universitaria de Zaragoza para el Progreso de la Psiquiatría y la Salud Mental
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

es en pt
Política de cookies Cookies policy Política de cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.