Regístrese
Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English Edition) Serological evolution in early syphilis
Journal Information
Vol. 37. Issue 3.
Pages 183-186 (March 2019)
Visits
191
Vol. 37. Issue 3.
Pages 183-186 (March 2019)
Brief report
DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2018.12.004
Full text access
Serological evolution in early syphilis
La evolución serológica en sífilis precoz
Visits
191
Maider Arandoa,b,
Corresponding author
marando@vhebron.net

Corresponding author.
, Miriam Mota-Foixc, Pere Armegola, María Jesús Barberáa, Juliana Esperalbad, Martí Vall-Mayansa
a Unidad de ITS Vall d’Hebron-Drassanes, Servicio Infeccioses, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
b Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
c Unidad de Estadística y Bioinformática, Institut de Recerca Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
d Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Abstract
Introduction

The evolution of syphilis after treatment could be affected by different factors, for example HIV. In consequence, HIV positive patients are sometimes treated with more doses of penicillin (PBG).

The aim of the study is to describe and compare the serological evolution by different factors in patients with early syphilis in Barcelona.

Methods

The serological control was made over the following year. A time analysis was performed through the study of Kaplan–Meier curves.

Results

The serological control was made in 208 patients, 42.5% of whom were HIV-positive. In a Kaplan–Meier curve the median of days needed to observe the cure was 99 [97–105] without differences depending on HIV, previous syphilis, stage or RPR titters. A better evolution was observed in patients treated with doxycycline p=0.02.

Conclusions

The serological evolution is similar in HIV-negative and HIV-positive patients treated according to current recommendations, observing the cure at 3 month after treatment.

Keywords:
Early syphilis
Serological evolution
Human immunodeficiency virus
Resumen
Introducción

La evolución serológica de la sífilis se puede ver influenciada por diferentes factores, entre ellos el VIH. Por este motivo en ocasiones los pacientes positivos para el VIH reciben mayor número de dosis de penicilina (PBG).

El objetivo del estudio es describir y comparar la evolución serológica según diferentes factores en pacientes con sífilis precoz en Barcelona.

Métodos

El seguimiento serológico se realizó durante 12 meses. El análisis de la evolución hasta el criterio de curación se realizó mediante curvas de Kaplan–Meier.

Resultados

De los 208 pacientes incluidos el 97,5% eran HSH y el 42,5% VIH-positivos. La curación se observó a los 99 días de mediana (97–134), sin diferencias según VIH, estadio, títulos de RPR o sífilis previa. Se observó mejor evolución en los pacientes tratados con doxiciclina p=0,021.

Conclusiones

La evolución serológica es similar tanto en pacientes VIH-positivos como en VIH-negativos tratados según las recomendaciones actuales, objetivándose la curación a los 3 meses del tratamiento.

Palabras clave:
Sífilis precoz
Evolución serológica
Virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana
Full Text
Introduction

Syphilis is an infection currently on the increase in a number of Western countries, including Spain, particularly among men who have sex with men. Despite epidemiological changes observed over the last few decades, there has been little change in the way it is managed.

From a microbiological point of view, new automated treponemal tests are available which provide good specificity and sensitivity.1 However, the same advances have not been made in the reagin tests; the Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) and the Venereal Diseases Research Laboratory tests have been used since the mid-20th century. The serological response pattern of the syphilis is based on these tests, determining adequate response to treatment or the diagnosis of possible re-infections.2 Cure is defined as a decrease by two dilutions in non-treponemal test titres in the 6–12 months following treatment. It is therefore important to have the serology results at the time of diagnosis and to perform serology follow-up after treatment.2

A number of different factors may affect the serological response pattern, such as age, gender, stage, history of syphilis and the RPR titre at the time of diagnosis.3–9 HIV-positive patients have been found to have a slower serological response,10 and a greater likelihood of treatment failure.11 On the basis of these studies, three doses of penicillin benzathine have been given to HIV-positive patients with secondary syphilis,7 and that trend still continues today in some places,12 even though the clinical guidelines no longer recommend it.13

The aim of this study was to describe the serological response pattern in patients diagnosed with early syphilis in Barcelona, and to compare the pattern according to HIV serostatus after receiving the same treatment, extending the study to other factors.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational study conducted at Vall d’Hebron-Drassanes Sexually Transmitted Infections Unit. Participation in the study was offered to patients seen in the unit from January to October 2015 diagnosed with early syphilis. After they agreed to join the study, they had serological follow-up prospectively for 12 months after treatment. The exclusion criterion was being under 18 years of age.

The diagnosis of early syphilis was based on the European guidelines on syphilis,13 classifying it as primary or secondary syphilis or early latent syphilis after clinical and serological assessment using treponemal tests and non-treponemal tests such as the RPR test (Biokit, Spain). In patients with a history of syphilis, only the RPR test was performed. To monitor the serological response, follow-up was carried out at 3, 6 and 12 months in HIV-negative patients and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months in HIV-positive patients. One month was defined as 20–60 days from diagnosis, 3 months as 60–150 days, 6 months as 150–240 days, 9 months as 240–330 days and 12 months as 330–444 days. Patients who failed to attend for follow-up at least twice were contacted at 6 and 12 months.

An appropriate response pattern was defined as the RPR becoming negative if the initial titre was <1/4 or a decrease of 2 dilutions in the RPR titre at 12 months after treatment. Patients with negative RPR at the time of diagnosis were not taken into account when conducting the study.

Qualitative variables were described as frequencies and percentages. Mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range were calculated for quantitative variables. To assess the patients’ cure time, a survival analysis was performed and the Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted and compared with the log-rank test. The statistical analysis was carried out using the R programme version 3.4.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing programme, Vienna, Austria).

The study was approved by Hospital Vall d’Hebron Ethics Committee. Signed informed consent was requested for participation in the study, including a specific section providing permission to contact them in case they did not attend the follow-up.

Results

Of the 274 cases with early syphilis diagnosed during the study, serological follow-up was performed in 208: 46 (17.2%) did not attend follow-up, and in 20 the initial RPR was negative.

Of the 208 patients, 202 (97.5%) were men who had sex with men, with a median age of 36 (31–44 years); 47.3% had a history of syphilis and 42.5% (88/207) were HIV-positive, with 87% on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with a median CD4 count of 623 [508; 815]. More than half (57%) were diagnosed with secondary syphilis, followed by primary syphilis (22.7%) and early latent syphilis (20.3%). The median of the RPR titres was 1/32 [1/16; 1/64].

The majority of patients (93%) were treated with one dose of penicillin; only 11 (6%) were treated with doxycycline. The remaining 1% received three doses of penicillin with preliminary diagnostic impression of undetermined latent syphilis which, after the microbiological results and the clinical progress, was diagnosed as early syphilis.

After a year of follow-up, 14 patients did not achieve decrease by two dilutions in the RPR titres: two were diagnosed with re-infection; ten did not attend the 12-month follow-up; and two were found to have sero-resistance.

Comparing the changes in RPR in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients, no significant differences were found in either group after one year. However, cure was detected earlier in HIV-negative patients; 96.5% of patients who attended the three-month follow-up already met the cure criteria, while that figure was 84.4% in HIV-positive patients (p=0.031). The difference had disappeared at six months.

To extend the study, the serological response pattern of all patients was analysed using a Kaplan–Meier curve (Fig. 1). Cure was observed at a median of 99 days (97; 106). When the same analysis was performed according to serostatus, no differences were found: in HIV-positive patients the median was 104 days (97–134), in HIV-negative patients 98 days (96–104, p=0.4). The same analysis on patients with secondary syphilis treated with one dose of penicillin also found no differences (p=0.46) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Pattern of the serological response (cure) after treatment in patients with early syphilis.

(0.11MB).
Fig. 2.

Pattern of the serological response (cure) in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients with secondary syphilis treated with a single dose of penicillin.

(0.09MB).

HIV-positive patients were compared according to CD4 count (≥350 vs <350) and whether or not they were on ART, with no differences in either case (p=0.852 and p=0.951, respectively), although the number of patients not on ART was small (only 10).

The same comparative analysis was performed according to other factors such as previous syphilis, RPR titres (RPR1/32 vs RPR<1/32) and treatment (penicillin vs doxycycline). Differences were only found in the treatment group, with patients treated with doxycycline having better outcomes than those treated with penicillin; p=0.021.

Discussion

Both the European and American clinical guidelines advise treating HIV-positive patients in the same way as HIV-negative patients.2,13 Despite that, HIV-positive patients continue to be treated with three doses of penicillin in some places.12 Our study shows that there is no difference in outcome between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients with secondary syphilis treated with one dose of penicillin. It is important to stress the need for serological follow-up, although this can sometimes be made difficult by the patient's perception of having been cured when the lesions disappear after treatment, and the high degree of mobility between cities and countries meaning that by the time of their appointment, the patient may no longer be in the same place. In HIV-positive patients, the need for follow-up is more important as the decrease in RPR titres can be slower. Gonzalez-Lopez et al.9 found that ART was associated with a better serological response pattern in HIV-positive patients, due to the immunological recovery and the better functioning of B lymphocytes possibly accelerating the decline of the RPR. We found no such association in our study, and nor was there any association according to the CD4 count, partly because of the small number of patients not on ART or with CD4 <350. The fact that ART is now being started when people are diagnosed with HIV may contribute to the influence of this factor having changed.

In our study, the only factor associated with a better serological response pattern was the treatment, but that may have been affected by the limited number of patients treated with doxycycline, as it was only used in patients allergic to penicillin. Other studies have described similar responses in the two groups.5,14,15

Conclusion

Serological follow-up in patients diagnosed with syphilis continues to be of paramount importance to assess the response to treatment, facilitate the diagnosis of re-infection and assess for possible sero-resistance (and the consequent risk of asymptomatic neurosyphilis). It is therefore vital that physicians explain and insist on this to patients. The serological response pattern is similar regardless of HIV status, and it is not necessary to treat HIV-positive patients with more doses of penicillin.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References
[1]
M.G. Morshed, A.E. Singhb.
Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis.
Clin Vaccine Immunol, 22 (2015), pp. 137-147
[2]
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Sexually transmitted infections guidelines 2015.
Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 64 (2015), pp. 1-137
[3]
J.S. Jinno, B. Anker, P. Kaur, C.C. Bristow, J.D. Klausner.
Predictors of serological failure after treatment in HIV-infected patients with early syphilis in the emerging era of universal antiretroviral therapy use.
BMC Infect Dis, 13 (2013), pp. 605
[4]
A.C. Seña, X.-H. Zhang, T. Li, H.P. Zheng, B. Yang, L.G. Yang, et al.
A systematic review of syphilis serological treatment outcomes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons: rethinking the significance of serological non-responsiveness and the serofast state after therapy.
BMC Infect Dis, 15 (2015), pp. 479
[5]
J.-C. Tsai, Y.-H. Lin, P.-L. Lu, N.J. Shen, C.J. Yang, N.Y. Lee, et al.
Comparison of serological response to doxycycline versus benzathine penicillin G in the treatment of early syphilis in HIV-infected patients: a multi-center observational study.
PLoS One, 9 (2014), pp. e109813
[6]
J. Dionne-Odom, E. Karita, W. Kilembe, F. Henderson, B. Vwalika, R. Bayingana, et al.
Syphilis treatment response among HIV-discordant couples in Zambia and Rwanda.
Clin Infect Dis, 56 (2013), pp. 1829-1837
[7]
D.F. Knaute, N. Graf, S. Lautenschlager, R. Weber, P.P. Bosshard.
Serological response to treatment of syphilis according to disease stage and HIV status.
Clin Infect Dis, 55 (2012), pp. 1615-1622
[8]
M.A. Horberg, D.K. Ranatunga, C.P. Quesenberry, D.B. Klein, M.J. Silverberg.
Syphilis epidemiology and clinical outcomes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients in Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Sex Transm Dis, 37 (2010), pp. 53-58
[9]
J.J. González-López, M.L.F. Guerrero, R. Luján, S.F. Tostado, M. de Górgolas, L. Requena.
Factors determining serologic response to treatment in patients with syphilis.
Clin Infect Dis, 49 (2009), pp. 1505-1511
[10]
K.G. Ghanem, E.J. Erbelding, Z.S. Wiener, A.M. Rompalo.
Serological response to syphilis treatment in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics.
Sex Transm Infect, 83 (2007), pp. 97-101
[11]
R.T. Rolfs, M.J. Riduan, E.F. Hendershot, A.M. Rompalo, M.H. Augenbraun, M. Chiu, et al.
A randomized trial of enhanced therapy for early syphilis in patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection.
N Engl J Med, 337 (1997), pp. 307-314
[12]
D. Dowell, P.M. Polgreen, S.E. Beekmann, K.A. Workowski, S.M. Berman, T.A. Peterman.
Dilemmas in the management of syphilis: a survey of infectious diseases experts.
Clin Infect Dis, 49 (2009), pp. 1526-1529
[13]
M. Janier, V. Hegyi, N. Dupin, M. Unemo, G.S. Tiplica, M. Potočnik, et al.
2014 European guideline on the management of syphilis.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 28 (2014), pp. 1581-1593
[14]
K.G. Ghanem, E.J. Erbelding, W.W. Cheng, A.M. Rompalo.
Doxycycline compared with benzathine penicillin for the treatment of early syphilis.
Clin Infect Dis, 42 (2006), pp. E45-E49
[15]
K. Salado-Rasmussen, S. Hoffmann, S. Cowan, J.S. Jensen, T. Benfield, J. Gerstoft, et al.
Serological response to treatment of syphilis with doxycycline compared with penicillin in HIV-infected individuals.
Acta Derm Venereol, 96 (2016), pp. 807-811

Please cite this article as: Arando M, Mota-Foix M, Armegol P, Barberá MJ, Esperalba J, Vall-Mayans M. La evolución serológica en sífilis precoz. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2019;37:183–186.

Copyright © 2018. Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

es en pt
Política de cookies Cookies policy Política de cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.