Buscar en
Endocrinología y Nutrición (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Endocrinología y Nutrición (English Edition) Diabetes insipidus induced by pregnancy. A case report
Journal Information
Vol. 60. Issue 2.
Pages 105-106 (February 2013)
Vol. 60. Issue 2.
Pages 105-106 (February 2013)
Scientific letter
Full text access
Diabetes insipidus induced by pregnancy. A case report
Diabetes insípida inducida por el embarazo. Comunicación de un caso
Visits
6076
Jhoan Aragón-Charris, Eduardo Reyna-Villasmil
Corresponding author
sippenbauch@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Helen De Nobrega-Correa, Duly Torres-Cepeda
Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Hospital Central «Dr. Urquinaona», Maracaibo, Estado Zulia, Venezuela
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

Diabetes insipidus (DI) is a rare endocrine disorder reported to occur in one per 25,000–30,000 people in the general population.1 The occurrence of this syndrome in pregnancy is even rarer, and only a limited number of cases of DI have therefore been reported during pregnancy. DI may be the continuation of the syndrome discovered before pregnancy, or may first occur during pregnancy and subsequently disappear.2

We report the case of a 16-year-old female patient, a primigravida with no significant clinical history regularly attending antenatal visits. No medical problems were reported until the 38th week of pregnancy, when she was found to have high blood pressure (162/102mmHg) associated with headache, epigastric pain, and proteinuria (650mg/day). Laboratory test results were normal, except for a serum creatinine level of 151mmol/L. An intravenous dose of clonidine was administered, and a magnesium sulfate infusion was started to stabilize the patient, after which a cesarean section was performed for fetal distress, delivering a live newborn weighing 3400g.

A persistent increase in urine output (900mL/h) and a urine specific gravity of 1005 were seen despite fluid restriction to 80mL/h. The patient reported severe polydipsia. On further questioning, the patient reported polydipsia and polyuria three months before admission. Plasma osmolality was 289mOsm/L, and decreased urinary osmolality (141mOsm/L) and normal glucose, potassium and calcium levels were found. DI was therefore diagnosed. Treatment was started with l-deamino 8-d arginine vasopressin (LDDV; 10μg intranasal twice daily), which resulted in decreased urine output within 60min of administration and increased urinary osmolality. Urinary osmolality increased to 249mOsm/L 48h after delivery, and LDDV was therefore discontinued. The patient was discharged from hospital on the fifth postpartum day with no signs of DI or additional complications. Endocrinological follow-up confirmed that there were no underlying metabolic disorders.

The placenta normally secretes small amounts of vasopressinase (a cystinaminopeptidase produced by the trophoblast), which reaches peak levels at the end of pregnancy. The factors predisposing some women to have placental vasopressinase levels high enough to cause DI are unknown. The sudden occurrence and rapid disappearance of symptoms suggest a diagnosis of DI induced by vasopressinase secreted by the placenta. Since vasopressinase levels decrease by 25% one day after delivery, rapid recovery in the postpartum period is normal.3 The risk of recurrence in the next pregnancy is unknown.

The usual signs of DI are polydipsia and polyuria. Diagnosis is not simple because of changes in water metabolism during pregnancy. The initial step is confirmation of free water diuresis to exclude diabetes mellitus. During pregnancy and in the absence of glycosuria, hypokalemia, or hypercalcemia, diabetes insipidus may be diagnosed in a patient with polydipsia and polyuria with serum osmolality higher than 285mOsm/L associated with hyposthenuria. The exclusion of organic diseases is essential to diagnose DI.4

As seen in the reported case, DI is often associated with preeclampsia. Specifically, DI has been associated with acute fatty liver of pregnancy or other liver diseases (elevated transaminases), which are also manifestations of preeclampsia. A hypothesis relating DI and preeclampsia was postulated by Gordge et al.5 These authors suggested that the association may be explained if vasopressin degradation products retain their pressor activity but lose their antidiuretic activity. Another theory proposes that decreased vasopressinase metabolism due to pre-existent liver disease results in increased vasopressinase activity and increased vasopressin degradation.6

Patients with DI need access to fluids containing free water. The oral intake of pregnant women is restricted in most obstetric departments, which makes intravenous fluid management essential. Because of their inability to concentrate urine, patients cannot prevent hyperosmolality without the administration of high amounts of free water.7 LDDV, a vasopressin analogue with a different amino terminal that makes it resistant to vasopressinase, may be administered. No maternal or fetal adverse effects of LDDV have been reported during pregnancy.8 Moreover, LDDV has no pressor effect, which is important because of the association of DI with preeclampsia.

References
[1]
S. Ananthakrishnan.
Diabetes insipidus in pregnancy: etiology, evaluation, and management.
Endocr Pract, 15 (2009), pp. 377-382
[2]
J. Sainz Bueno, P. Villarejo Ortíz, J. Hidalgo Amat, V. Caballero Fernández, M. Caballero Manzano, R. Garrido Teruel.
Transient diabetes insipidus during pregnancy: a clinical case and a review of the syndrome.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 118 (2005), pp. 251-254
[3]
I. Kalelioglu, A. Kubat Uzum, A. Yildirim, T. Ozkan, F. Gungor, R. Has.
Transient gestational diabetes insipidus diagnosed in successive pregnancies: review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and management of delivery.
Pituitary, 10 (2007), pp. 87-93
[4]
T. Fukami, Y. Makino, T. Kawarabayashi.
Pregnancy complicated by multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies.
J Obste Gynaecol Res, 32 (2006), pp. 252-256
[5]
M. Gordge, D. Williams, N. Huggett, N. Payne, G. Neild.
Loss of biological activity of arginine vasopressin during its degradation by vasopressinase from pregnancy serum.
Clin Endocrinol, 42 (1995), pp. 51-58
[6]
A. El-Hennawy, T. Bassi, N. Koradia, A. Bocirnea.
Transient gestational diabetes insipidus: report of two cases and review of pathophysiology and treatment.
J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med, 14 (2003), pp. 349-352
[7]
A. Passannante, V. Kopp, D. Mayer.
Diabetes insipidus and epidural analgesia for labor.
Anesth Analg, 80 (1995), pp. 837-838
[8]
J. Ray.
DDAVP use during pregnancy: an analysis of its safety for mother and child.
Obstet Gynecol Surv, 53 (1998), pp. 450-455

Please cite this article as: Aragón-Charris J, et al. Diabetes insípida inducida por el embarazo. Comunicación de un caso. Endocrinol Nutr. 2013;60:105–6.

Copyright © 2011. SEEN
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos