Buscar en
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española (English Edition) Trocar Site Hernia: A More Common Problem Than We Believe?
Journal Information
Vol. 97. Issue 7.
Pages 410-411 (August - September 2019)
Vol. 97. Issue 7.
Pages 410-411 (August - September 2019)
Scientific Letter
DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2019.06.006
Full text access
Trocar Site Hernia: A More Common Problem Than We Believe?
Hernia del orificio del trocar, ¿un problema más frecuente de lo que creemos?
Visits
...
Cristina Alhambra Rodríguez de Guzmán, Antonio José Morandeira Rivas, María Luz Herrero Bogajo, Carlos Moreno Sanz
Corresponding author
cmsurgery@hotmail.com

Corresponding author.
Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General La Mancha Centro, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Table 1. Incidence of Incisional Hernia After Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Full Text

Trocar site hernias are a complication of minimally invasive surgery that are often underestimated. These lesions cause patient discomfort and require surgery for their correction, which increases healthcare costs.

The data available in the literature on the incidence of trocar site hernias in laparoscopic surgery are very variable, ranging from 0.3% to 31.9%.1–5 This complication seems to be more frequent in umbilical trocars compared to other locations outside the midline, and there is speculation that this may be due to the weakness of the abdominal wall in this area, as well as longer incisions and the frequent need to extend the incision for the extraction of the surgical specimen. In recent years, the development of single-incision laparoscopic procedures, which are generally umbilical and require slightly larger incisions than conventional procedures, has raised concerns about long-term safety in terms of wound complications. In this instance, we have found hernia rates reported in the literature ranging from 1% to 8.4% using this approach.6–8

In our group, we have analyzed the incidence of umbilical trocar site hernias in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy using minimally invasive surgery techniques. A cohort of 108 patients was treated with a multiport approach using a supraumbilical balloon port, and another cohort with 109 patients was treated through a single transumbilical incision. The groups were comparable for different risk factors, such as infection rate, body mass index or incidence of diabetes mellitus. Follow-up was more than 3 years for most patients, during which we observed a high incidence of incisional hernia in both groups (29.6% and 5.5%, respectively), most of which were detected within the first 2 years of follow-up.

Some authors, such as Marks et al., have compared the incisional hernia rate between multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and single-incision cholecystectomy, finding no differences 3 months after the intervention but observing differences after one year of follow-up, with an incidence of 8.4% in single-incision and 1.2% in conventional laparoscopy.6 Several recently published meta-analyses describe an increased risk of hernia in the single-incision group, although there is great variability in the follow-up between the studies analyzed as well as significant heterogeneity in the technique and material used for the abdominal wall closure7,8 (Table 1). In our series, the incidences of incisional hernias in patients who had undergone single-incision procedures is similar to reports by other authors, so it seems that the difference between the two techniques may be mainly due to the high incidence of incisional hernias in patients with the conventional approach.

Table 1.

Incidence of Incisional Hernia After Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Study  Year  Incisional Hernia After SILC (%)  Incidence Incisional Hernia After CLC (%)  Follow-up Time (Months) 
Jorgensen  2014  1.7  1.7  12 
Khorgami  2013  1.6  12 
Ma  2011  4.7  NA 
Marks  2013  10.1  1.6  12 
Saad  2013  2.9 
Sinan  2012  5.9  NA 
Solomon  2012  4.5 
Villalonga  2012  1.4  2.8 
Zapf  2013  1.9  16 

CLC: conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy; SILC: single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy; NA: not available.

These figures in the multi-port surgery group, although high, are in line with those of other prospective series in cholecystectomized patients after a conventional laparoscopic approach. For instance, the publication by Comajuncosas et al.3 reports the global incidence of umbilical trocar hernia at 25.9% after a mean follow-up of 3 years, while the study by Armañanzas et al.4 reports 31.9% in patients with risk factors for incisional hernia. Incidences that are far from 0.3% to 5.4% are frequently described in the literature,2 leading to maintained interest in this complication and the search for prevention strategies, such as the use of prophylactic prostheses in selected patients.4,9

Several factors have been associated with the appearance of trocar site hernias: some related to the patient, others with the disease being treated, and yet others with technical aspects of the procedure.1–5 In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, these factors include: diabetes, obesity, incision length and surgical site infection.3,5 In our patients, wound infection was associated with a higher risk of incisional hernia, and a slight increase in risk was also observed at higher BMI. In this sense, and although it may be considered something obvious and common to any abdominal wall incision, we should insist on the importance of taking precautions to reduce surgical site infections as part of the strategy for trocar site hernia prevention.

Factors associated with the surgical technique can also influence the appearance of incisional hernias. In our series, the same closure technique was used in all patients (simple interrupted suture, 3–4 stitches at a distance of 0.5cm, using long-lasting absorbable synthetic material), which leads us to believe that others details, such as the type of trocar or the location (supraumbilical versus transumbilical incision), may have contributed to the appearance of these differences.

Trocar site hernias are an important complication whose evaluation requires long-term follow-up. However, the duration of this follow-up does not seem to be the only factor that explains the difference between the low incidences found in most studies and the extremely high incidences observed in others. The study of other risk factors, beyond those associated with the patient, including technical details and the surgical material used, should shed light on this matter and facilitate the implementation of strategies for the prevention of this complication.

References
[1]
H. Tonouchi, Y. Ohmori, M. Kobayashi, M. Kusunoki.
Trocar site hernia.
Arch Surg, 139 (2004), pp. 1248-1256
[2]
D. Bunting.
Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
[3]
J. Camajuncosas, H. Vallverdú, R. Orbeal, D. Parés.
Eventración de los orificios de los trocares en cirugía laparoscópica.
[4]
L. Armañanzas, J. Ruiz-Tovar, A. Arroyo, P. García-Peche, E. Armañanzas, M. Díez, et al.
Prophylactic Mesh vs suture in the closure of the umbilical trocar site after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in high-risk patients for incisional hernia. A randomized clinical trial.
J Am Coll Surg, 218 (2014), pp. 960-968
[5]
J. Comajuncosas, J. Hermoso, P. Gris, J. Jimeno, R. Orbeal, H. Vallverdu, et al.
Risk factors for umbilical trocar site incisional hernia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective 3-year follow-up study.
[6]
J.M. Marks, M.S. Phillips, R. Tacchino, K. Roberts, R. Onders, G. Denoto, et al.
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
J Am Coll Surg, 216 (2013), pp. 1037-1047
[7]
R. Haueter, T. Schütz, D.A. Raptis, P. Clavien, M. Zuber.
Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis.
Br J Surg, 104 (2017), pp. 1141-1159
[8]
S. Antoniou, S. Morales-Conde, G.A. Antoniou, F.A. Granderath, F. Berrevoet, F.E. Muysoma.
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
[9]
C. Moreno-Sanz, J.S. Picazo-Yeste, M. Manzanera-Díaz, M.L. Herrero-Bogajo, J. Cortina-Oliva, G. Tadeo-Ruiz.
Prevention of trocar site hernias: description of the safe port plug technique and preliminary results.
Surg Innov, 15 (2008), pp. 100-104

Please cite this article as: Rodríguez de Guzmán CA, Morandeira Rivas AJ, Herrero Bogajo ML, Moreno Sanz C. Hernia del orificio del trocar, ¿un problema más frecuente de lo que creemos? Cir Esp. 2019;97:410–411.

Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

es en pt
Política de cookies Cookies policy Política de cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.